MMS 13 4 IAG Update on AEA Tasks th

1
Assessment and Criticality of Defects and Damage in Materials Systems
MMS 13 4th IAG
Culham Science Centre
15th January 2004
© AEA Technology 2004
AEA Technology In Confidence
Update on AEA Tasks
© AEA Technology 2004
AEA Technology In Confidence
2
© AEA Technology 2004
AEA Technology In Confidence
3
4
Assessment and Criticality of Defects and Damage in Materials Systems
Task 1 Review
Purpose
Review & assess current industrial guidelines & codes of practice from
a range of industrial sectors
Procedure
Review existing guidelines for defect assessment (Dow, CEN, BSI,
ISO, ASME, NORSOK, ESA, NASA, Boeing, MIL HDBK-17, etc.)
Examine defect types applicable to various materials systems
Compare defect assessment codes with those for metals
Task 1 report issued to IAG for comment and subsequently revised
© AEA Technology 2004
AEA Technology In Confidence
Review approaches for different industry sectors
5
Assessment and Criticality of Defects & Damage in Materials Systems
Defect Types
Inclusions
Improper splicing/ joining
Fibre misalignment and wrinkling
Incorrect stacking sequence
Porosity
Resin starved areas
Damage from tooling removal
Machining imperfections
Manufacturing defects
In-service defects
Matrix Cracking
Heat damage
© AEA Technology 2004
AEA Technology In Confidence
Debonding
Delamination
Fibre breakage
6
Assessment and Criticality of Defects & Damage in Materials Systems
Task 3 NDE Assessment
Visual inspection
Ultrasonics (reflection & transmission)
Radiography (X-ray and - ray)
Laser shearography
Thermography
Acoustic emission
© AEA Technology 2004
AEA Technology In Confidence
Tap/ vibration testing
7
EXISTING COMPOSITE RELATED DESIGN STANDARDS & GUIDELINES
including manufacturing defect assessment
BS 4994 :1987
ASME RTP-1:1995
ASME X: 2001
ISO 14692: 2002
DNV F-100: 2001
DNV OS-C501: 2003
EN 13706: 2001
NORSOK M-622: 1999
ESA Composite Design Handbook Guidelines
Commercial aircraft industry guidelines (NASA/ Boeing & Airbus)
MIL-HDBK-17: 2002
© AEA Technology 2004
AEA Technology In Confidence
Dow Chemicals Specifications
8
MMS 13 Assessment and Criticality of Defects & Damage in Materials Systems
DEFECT ASSESSMENT CODES FOR METALLIC STRUCTURES
BS 7910: 1999
CODE R6 - NUCLEAR ELECTRIC: 1990
API 579: 2000
Contents – Minimum Requirement
Definition of the defect types
Definition of material properties needed to perform the assessment
Guidance on defect characterisation - geometry
Definition of the analysis procedures
Guidance on acceptability criteria
© AEA Technology 2004
AEA Technology In Confidence
Definition of loading to be considered
© AEA Technology 2004
AEA Technology In Confidence
9
© AEA Technology 2004
AEA Technology In Confidence
10
11
Inspection techniques
Practical assessments on the following inspection
techniques have been made during the medium term
pressure tests;
For thermosetting polymers the time scale for crack
initiation is much greater than for crack propagation.
This is the fundamental inspection challenge
© AEA Technology 2004
AEA Technology In Confidence
• Acoustic emission
• Ultrasonics
• Eddy current
• Thermography
• Shearography
• X-rays
© AEA Technology 2004
AEA Technology In Confidence
12
© AEA Technology 2004
AEA Technology In Confidence
13
© AEA Technology 2004
AEA Technology In Confidence
14
15
Ultrasonic Testing
The simplest technique uses a hand-held pulse-echo probe - unable
to detect 5 mm diameter hole in the steel pipe under the composite
overwrap. More sophisticated versions of the ultrasonic technique
(angled twin probes, Time of Flight TOFD) were then assessed
The Harwell trials were carried out using a multi-channel AEA digital
ultrasonic imaging system.
The features of this equipment are:
• Low inherent noise characteristics
• Signal averaging noise suppression capability
• Grey scale imaging capability with image enhancement
Ultrasonic velocity =  [Bulk Modulus (K)/ density ()]
Typical velocity ~ 5.9 mm/msec for steel
~ 2.4 - 2.8 mm/msec for composite
© AEA Technology 2004
AEA Technology In Confidence
• Long range capability
16
Ultrasonic Testing – Principles of simple hand-held probe
•
•
•
•
•
+100%
© AEA Technology 2004
AEA Technology In Confidence
-100%
•
© AEA Technology 2004
AEA Technology In Confidence
17
© AEA Technology 2004
AEA Technology In Confidence
18
© AEA Technology 2004
AEA Technology In Confidence
19
© AEA Technology 2004
AEA Technology In Confidence
20
© AEA Technology 2004
AEA Technology In Confidence
21
© AEA Technology 2004
AEA Technology In Confidence
22
© AEA Technology 2004
AEA Technology In Confidence
23
© AEA Technology 2004
AEA Technology In Confidence
24
© AEA Technology 2004
AEA Technology In Confidence
25
© AEA Technology 2004
AEA Technology In Confidence
26
Laser shearography – HST 125 composite cabs
© AEA Technology 2004
AEA Technology In Confidence
27
Delamination
around opening
© AEA Technology 2004
AEA Technology In Confidence
28
© AEA Technology 2004
AEA Technology In Confidence
29
30
LIXI Profiler - summary of results


AEA Technology In Confidence

Rapid, hand held scanning.
 Surprisingly effective! High POD in CRIS trial.
Information on which wall of pipe defect is in done by moving
source.
Detected:
 Severe corrosion in HOIS small bore connector specimen,
moderate corrosion not clearly found
 In UK demo, detected defects under insulation, under
composite repair, and internal corrosion in bare straight-pipe
Limited information in 1-D profiles, compared with full radiograph
© AEA Technology 2004

31
Inspection - Recommendations
For composite overwrap repairs there are 3 prevalent defect types,
namely the following inspection techniques are recommended;
• General wall loss of the substrate (e.g. through internal corrosion)
– EM techniques (PEC) or X-rays
• Pin hole leaks (e.g. through localised corrosion at a weld)
– US although further refinement of the most appropriate form
is required
Potential for further work continuing on these latter 2 inspection
techniques. Also X-ray techniques will be assessed for the detection
of pin hole leaks
© AEA Technology 2004
AEA Technology In Confidence
• Delamination of the composite laminate (e.g. through debonding)
– Laser shearography again further refinement is required
© AEA Technology 2004
AEA Technology In Confidence
32
© AEA Technology 2004
AEA Technology In Confidence
33
34
© AEA Technology 2004
AEA Technology In Confidence
Assessment and Criticality of Defects & Damage in Materials Systems