MÅNLJUS Månsken är just det – månens sken. Reflekterar månen solljus? Avger månen sitt eget ljus? Kan man genom att reflektera solens ljus ändra egenskaperna för solljuset? Kan man reflektera avvikande ljusegenskaper som inte existerar i källan? Bibehåller månens ljus den uppvärmande egenskapen hos solljus? Om månen reflekterar solens ljus bör det också värma (men något mindre än solljus) ett föremål i månljus gentemot ett i skuggan. Eller i sämsta fall inte ha någon effekt alls på temperaturen hos föremålet. 3 MÅNLJUS och SOLLJUS Solen och månen är bevisligen unika ljuskällor som skiner med sina egna unika ljus. Solens ljus är gyllene, varmt, torkande, konserverande och antiseptiskt. Månens ljus är silvrigt, kylande, fuktigt, ruttnande och septiskt. Solens strålar minskar förbränningen av ett bål, medan månens strålar ökar förbränningen. Växt- och djurämnen som utsätts för solljus torkar snabbt, krymper, koagulerar och tappar en tendens att bryta ner och ruttna. Druvor och andra frukter blir fasta, delvis kanderade och bevaras som russin, dadlar och katrinplommon. Djurkött koagulerar och förlorar flyktiga gasformiga beståndsdelar; det blir fast, torrt och förfaller långsamt. Månsken däremot gör att växt- och djurämnen tenderar att visa symptom på förruttnelse och förfall. I direkt solljus visar en termometer högre temperatur än en termometer placerad i skuggan. Men i direkt månsken läser en termometer lägre temperatur än i skuggan av månljus. Om solens ljus samlas i en stor lins till en fokuserad punkt skapas betydande värme, medan månens ljus samlat på samma sätt inte skapar värme. 4 MÅNLJUS ÄR KALLT Faktum är att månsken inte återspeglas av solen, vilket visas av månljusets avvikande egenskaper. Solen värmer objekt i dess ljus i motsats till månljus som har en kylande effekt. Solljus har en gulvit färg. Månen har ett mer silverfärgat typ av ljus. Ett vetenskapligt påstående är att månen är en reflektor av solljus. Eftersom det inte finns några andra kända ljuskällor som reflekterar ljus på månen måste man dra slutsatsen att månen är ett ljus i sig. Månen skapar sitt eget unika ljus. 5 6 Fakta rörande månljus som du kan konstatera själv: Ett föremål i skugga är något varmare än när det exponeras av månljus. 1 Med den vetenskapliga metoden ska man kunna upprepa ett experiment, och om resultaten är desamma är en hypotes bevisad. Vad du behöver IR-Termometer Lämpligt material för mätning av yttemperatur Skärm för att skapa skugga Månljus I våra egna experiment har vi använt kartong för mätning av yttemperatur. Det kan ta 10-30 minuter innan temperaturer har stabiliserats. Månens altitud är en avgörande faktor. Ju högre altitud desto större temperaturskillnad. 1 Yttemperatur hos ett föremål är cirka 1-4 °C kallare i månljus. 7 “Lunar eclipses have happened and continue to happen regularly when both the Sun and Moon are still visible together above the horizon!” Eric Dubay “The sun's light, when concentrated by a number of plane or concave mirrors throwing the light to the same point; or by a large burning lens, produces a black or non-luminous focus, in which the heat is so intense that metallic and alkaline substances are quickly fused; earthy and mineral compounds almost immediately vitrified; and all animal and vegetable structures in a few seconds decomposed, burned up and destroyed. The moon's light concentrated in the above manner produces a focus so brilliant and luminous that it is difficult to look upon it; yet there is no increase of temperature. In the focus of sunlight there is great heat but no light. In that of the moon's light there is great light but no heat.” Dr. Samuel Rowbotham, “Zetetic Astronomy, Earth Not a Globe!” (144) “Light which is reflected must necessarily be of the same character as that which causes the reflection, but the light of the Moon is altogether different from the light of the Sun, therefore the light of the Moon is not reflected from the Sun. The Sun's light is red and hot, the Moon's pale and cold - the Sun's dries and preserves certain kinds of fish and fruit, such as cod and grapes, for the table, but the Moon's turns such to putrefaction - the Sun's will often put out a coal fire, while the Moon's will cause it to bum more brightly - the rays of the 8 Sun, focused through a burning-glass, will set wood on fire, and even fuse metals, while the rays of the Moon, concentrated to the strongest power, do not exhibit the very slightest signs of heat. I have myself long thought that the light of the Moon is Electric, but, be that as it may, even a Board School child can perceive that its light is totally unlike that of the Sun.” David Wardlaw Scott, “Terra Firma” (151-2) “If the moon lifted up the water, it is evident that near the land, the water would be drawn away and low instead of high tide caused. Again, the velocity and path of the moon are uniform, and it follows that if she exerted any influence on the earth, that influence could only be a uniform influence. But the tides are not uniform. At Port Natal the rise and fall is about 6 feet, while at Beira, about 600 miles up the coast, the rise and fall is 26 feet. This effectually settles the matter that the moon has no influence on the tides. Tides are caused by the gentle and gradual rise and fall of the earth on the bosom of the mighty deep. In inland lakes, there are no tides; which also proves that the moon cannot attract either the earth or water to cause tides. But the fact that the basin of the lake is on the earth which rests on the waters of the deep shows that no tides are possible, as the waters of the lakes together with the earth rise and fall, and thus the tides at the coast are caused; while there are no tides on waters unconnected with the sea.” Thomas Winship, “Zetetic Cosmogeny” (130-131) 9 “It is affirmed that the intensity of attraction increases with proximity, and vice versâ. How, then, when the waters are drawn up by the moon from their bed, and away from the earth's attraction,--which at that greater distance from the centre is considerably diminished, while that of the moon is proportionately increased-is it possible that all the waters acted on should be prevented leaving the earth and flying away to the moon? If the moon has power of attraction sufficient to lift the waters of the earth at all, even a single inch from their deepest receptacles, where the earth's attraction is much the greater, there is nothing in the theory of attraction of gravitation to prevent her taking to herself all the waters which come within her influence. Let the smaller body once overcome the power of the larger, and the power of the smaller becomes greater than when it first operated, because the matter acted on is nearer to it. Proximity is greater, and therefore power is greater … How then can the waters of the ocean immediately underneath the moon flow towards the shores, and so cause a flood tide? Water flows, it is said, through the law of gravity, or attraction of the earth's centre; is it possible then for the moon, having once overcome the power of the earth, to let go her hold upon the waters, through the influence of a power which she has conquered, and which therefore, is less than her own? … The above and other difficulties which exist in connection with the explanation of the tides afforded by the Newtonian system, have led many, including Sir Isaac Newton himself, to admit that such explanation is the least satisfactory portion of 10 the ‘theory of gravitation.’ Thus we have been carried forward by the sheer force of evidence to the conclusion that the tides of the sea do not arise from the attraction of the moon, but simply from the rising and falling of the floating earth in the waters of the ‘great deep.’ That calmness which is found to exist at the bottom of the great seas could not be possible if the waters were alternately raised by the moon and pulled down by the earth.” Dr. Samuel Rowbotham, “Zetetic Astronomy, Earth Not a Globe!” (159-175) “Even Sir Isaac Newton himself confessed that the explanation of the Moon's action on the Tides was the least satisfactory part of his theory of Gravitation. This theory asserts that the larger object attracts the smaller, and the mass of the Moon being reckoned as only oneeighth of that of the Earth, it follows that, if, by the presumed force of Gravitation, the Earth revolves round the Sun, much more, for the same reason, should the Moon do so likewise, instead of which that willful orb still continues to go round our world. Tides vary greatly in height, owing chiefly to the different configurations of the adjoining lands. At Chepstow it rises to 60 feet, at Portishead to 50, while at Dublin Bay it is but 1 2, and at Wexford only 5 feet … That the Earth itself has a slight tremulous motion may be seen in the movement of the spirit-level, even when fixed as steadily as possible, and that the sea has a fluctuation may be witnessed by the oscillation of an anchored ship in the calmest day of summer. By what means 11 the tides are so regularly affected is at present only conjectured; possibly it may be by atmospheric pressure on the waters of the Great Deep, and perhaps even the Moon itself, as suggested by the late Dr. Rowbotham, may influence the atmosphere, increasing or diminishing its barometric pressure, and indirectly the rise and fall of the Earth in the waters.” David Wardlaw Scott, “Terra Firma” (259-260) “Bearing this fact in mind, that there exists a continual pressure of the atmosphere upon the Earth, and associating it with the fact that the Earth is a vast plane ‘stretched out upon the waters,’ and it will be seen that it must of necessity slightly fluctuate, or slowly rise and fall in the water. As by the action of the atmosphere the Earth is slowly depressed, the water moves towards the receding shore and produces the flood tide; and when by the reaction of the resisting oceanic medium the Earth gradually ascends the waters recede, and the ebb tide is produced. This is the general cause of tides. Whatever peculiarities are observable they may be traced to the reaction of channels, bays, headlands, and other local causes … That the Earth has a vibratory or tremulous motion, such as must necessarily belong to a floating and fluctuating structure, is abundantly proved by the experience of astronomers and surveyors. If a delicate spirit-level be firmly placed upon a rock or upon the most solid foundation which it is possible to construct, the very curious phenomenon will be observed of constant change in the position of the air-bubble. However care- 12 fully the ‘level’ may be adjusted, and the instrument protected from the atmosphere, the ‘bubble’ will not maintain its position many seconds together. A somewhat similar influence has been noticed in astronomical observatories, where instruments of the best construction and placed in the most approved positions cannot always be relied upon without occasional re-adjustment.” Dr. Samuel Rowbotham, “Earth Not a Globe, 2nd Edition” (108-110) “Astronomers have indulged in imagination to such a degree that the moon is now considered to be a solid, opaque spherical world, having mountains, valleys, lakes, or seas, volcanic craters, and other conditions analogous to the surface of the earth. So far has this fancy been carried that the whole visible disc has been mapped out, and special names given to its various peculiarities, as though they had been carefully observed, and actually measured by a party of terrestrial ordinance surveyors. All this has been done in direct opposition to the fact that whoever, for the first time, and without previous bias of mind, looks at the moon's surface through a powerful telescope, is puzzled to say what it is really like, or how to compare it with anything known to him. The comparison which may be made will depend upon the state of mind of the observer. It is well known that persons looking at the rough bark of a tree, or at the irregular lines or veins in certain kinds of marble and stone, or gazing at the red embers in a dull fire will, according to the degree of activity of the imagination, be able to see many 13 different forms, even the outlines of animals and of human faces. It is in this way that persons may fancy that the moon's surface is broken up into hills and valleys, and other conditions such as are found on earth. But that anything really similar to the surface of our own world is anywhere visible upon the moon is altogether fallacious.” Dr. Samuel Rowbotham, “Zetetic Astronomy, Earth Not a Globe!” (335) 14 För mer information om Månen och Jorden besök: http://jorden.info Köp e-böcker: Zetetic Astronomy. Earth Not a Globe! Zetetic Cosmogony Terra Firma : The Earth Not a Planet
© Copyright 2024