Månljus är kallt

MÅNLJUS
Månsken är just det – månens sken.
Reflekterar månen solljus?
Avger månen sitt eget ljus?
Kan man genom att reflektera solens ljus ändra egenskaperna för solljuset?
Kan man reflektera avvikande ljusegenskaper som inte existerar i källan?
Bibehåller månens ljus den uppvärmande egenskapen hos
solljus? Om månen reflekterar solens ljus bör det också
värma (men något mindre än solljus) ett föremål i månljus
gentemot ett i skuggan. Eller i sämsta fall inte ha någon
effekt alls på temperaturen hos föremålet.
3
MÅNLJUS och SOLLJUS
Solen och månen är bevisligen unika ljuskällor som skiner
med sina egna unika ljus. Solens ljus är gyllene, varmt, torkande, konserverande och antiseptiskt. Månens ljus är
silvrigt, kylande, fuktigt, ruttnande och septiskt. Solens
strålar minskar förbränningen av ett bål, medan månens
strålar ökar förbränningen.
Växt- och djurämnen som utsätts för solljus torkar snabbt,
krymper, koagulerar och tappar en tendens att bryta ner
och ruttna. Druvor och andra frukter blir fasta, delvis kanderade och bevaras som russin, dadlar och katrinplommon. Djurkött koagulerar och förlorar flyktiga gasformiga
beståndsdelar; det blir fast, torrt och förfaller långsamt.
Månsken däremot gör att växt- och djurämnen tenderar
att visa symptom på förruttnelse och förfall.
I direkt solljus visar en termometer högre temperatur än
en termometer placerad i skuggan. Men i direkt månsken
läser en termometer lägre temperatur än i skuggan av
månljus.
Om solens ljus samlas i en stor lins till en fokuserad punkt
skapas betydande värme, medan månens ljus samlat på
samma sätt inte skapar värme.
4
MÅNLJUS ÄR KALLT
Faktum är att månsken inte återspeglas av solen, vilket visas av månljusets avvikande egenskaper. Solen värmer objekt i dess ljus i motsats till månljus som har en kylande
effekt. Solljus har en gulvit färg. Månen har ett mer silverfärgat typ av ljus.
Ett vetenskapligt påstående är att månen är en reflektor av
solljus. Eftersom det inte finns några andra kända ljuskällor som reflekterar ljus på månen måste man dra slutsatsen att månen är ett ljus i sig.
Månen skapar sitt eget unika ljus.
5
6
Fakta rörande månljus som du kan konstatera själv:
Ett föremål i skugga är något varmare än när det exponeras av månljus. 1
Med den vetenskapliga metoden ska man kunna upprepa
ett experiment, och om resultaten är desamma är en hypotes bevisad.
Vad du behöver




IR-Termometer
Lämpligt material för mätning av yttemperatur
Skärm för att skapa skugga
Månljus
I våra egna experiment har vi använt kartong för mätning
av yttemperatur. Det kan ta 10-30 minuter innan temperaturer har stabiliserats. Månens altitud är en avgörande
faktor. Ju högre altitud desto större temperaturskillnad.
1
Yttemperatur hos ett föremål är cirka 1-4 °C kallare i månljus.
7
“Lunar eclipses have happened and continue to
happen regularly when both the Sun and Moon are
still visible together above the horizon!”
Eric Dubay
“The sun's light, when concentrated by a number
of plane or concave mirrors throwing the light
to the same point; or by a large burning lens,
produces a black or non-luminous focus, in which
the heat is so intense that metallic and alkaline substances are quickly fused; earthy and
mineral compounds almost immediately vitrified;
and all animal and vegetable structures in a few
seconds decomposed, burned up and destroyed. The
moon's light concentrated in the above manner
produces a focus so brilliant and luminous that
it is difficult to look upon it; yet there is no
increase of temperature. In the focus of sunlight there is great heat but no light. In that
of the moon's light there is great light but no
heat.”
Dr. Samuel Rowbotham, “Zetetic Astronomy, Earth
Not a Globe!” (144)
“Light which is reflected must necessarily be of
the same character as that which causes the reflection, but the light of the Moon is altogether different from the light of the Sun,
therefore the light of the Moon is not reflected
from the Sun. The Sun's light is red and hot,
the Moon's pale and cold - the Sun's dries and
preserves certain kinds of fish and fruit, such
as cod and grapes, for the table, but the Moon's
turns such to putrefaction - the Sun's will often put out a coal fire, while the Moon's will
cause it to bum more brightly - the rays of the
8
Sun, focused through a burning-glass, will set
wood on fire, and even fuse metals, while the
rays of the Moon, concentrated to the strongest
power, do not exhibit the very slightest signs
of heat. I have myself long thought that the
light of the Moon is Electric, but, be that as
it may, even a Board School child can perceive
that its light is totally unlike that of the
Sun.”
David Wardlaw Scott, “Terra Firma” (151-2)
“If the moon lifted up the water, it is evident
that near the land, the water would be drawn
away and low instead of high tide caused. Again,
the velocity and path of the moon are uniform,
and it follows that if she exerted any influence
on the earth, that influence could only be a
uniform influence. But the tides are not uniform. At Port Natal the rise and fall is about
6 feet, while at Beira, about 600 miles up the
coast, the rise and fall is 26 feet. This effectually settles the matter that the moon has
no influence on the tides. Tides are caused by
the gentle and gradual rise and fall of the earth
on the bosom of the mighty deep. In inland lakes,
there are no tides; which also proves that the
moon cannot attract either the earth or water to
cause tides. But the fact that the basin of the
lake is on the earth which rests on the waters
of the deep shows that no tides are possible, as
the waters of the lakes together with the earth
rise and fall, and thus the tides at the coast
are caused; while there are no tides on waters
unconnected with the sea.”
Thomas Winship, “Zetetic Cosmogeny” (130-131)
9
“It is affirmed that the intensity of attraction
increases with proximity, and vice versâ. How,
then, when the waters are drawn up by the moon
from their bed, and away from the earth's attraction,--which at that greater distance from
the centre is considerably diminished, while
that of the moon is proportionately increased-is it possible that all the waters acted on
should be prevented leaving the earth and flying
away to the moon? If the moon has power of attraction sufficient to lift the waters of the
earth at all, even a single inch from their
deepest receptacles, where the earth's attraction is much the greater, there is nothing in
the theory of attraction of gravitation to prevent her taking to herself all the waters which
come within her influence. Let the smaller body
once overcome the power of the larger, and the
power of the smaller becomes greater than when
it first operated, because the matter acted on
is nearer to it. Proximity is greater, and
therefore power is greater … How then can the
waters of the ocean immediately underneath the
moon flow towards the shores, and so cause a
flood tide? Water flows, it is said, through the
law of gravity, or attraction of the earth's
centre; is it possible then for the moon, having
once overcome the power of the earth, to let go
her hold upon the waters, through the influence
of a power which she has conquered, and which
therefore, is less than her own? … The above
and other difficulties which exist in connection
with the explanation of the tides afforded by
the Newtonian system, have led many, including
Sir Isaac Newton himself, to admit that such
explanation is the least satisfactory portion of
10
the ‘theory of gravitation.’ Thus we have been
carried forward by the sheer force of evidence
to the conclusion that the tides of the sea do
not arise from the attraction of the moon, but
simply from the rising and falling of the floating earth in the waters of the ‘great deep.’
That calmness which is found to exist at the
bottom of the great seas could not be possible
if the waters were alternately raised by the
moon and pulled down by the earth.”
Dr. Samuel Rowbotham, “Zetetic Astronomy, Earth
Not a Globe!” (159-175)
“Even Sir Isaac Newton himself confessed that
the explanation of the Moon's action on the
Tides was the least satisfactory part of his
theory of Gravitation. This theory asserts that
the larger object attracts the smaller, and the
mass of the Moon being reckoned as only oneeighth of that of the Earth, it follows that,
if, by the presumed force of Gravitation, the
Earth revolves round the Sun, much more, for the
same reason, should the Moon do so likewise,
instead of which that willful orb still continues to go round our world. Tides vary greatly in
height, owing chiefly to the different configurations of the adjoining lands. At Chepstow it
rises to 60 feet, at Portishead to 50, while at
Dublin Bay it is but 1 2, and at Wexford only 5
feet … That the Earth itself has a slight tremulous motion may be seen in the movement of the
spirit-level, even when fixed as steadily as
possible, and that the sea has a fluctuation may
be witnessed by the oscillation of an anchored
ship in the calmest day of summer. By what means
11
the tides are so regularly affected is at present only conjectured; possibly it may be by
atmospheric pressure on the waters of the Great
Deep, and perhaps even the Moon itself, as suggested by the late Dr. Rowbotham, may influence
the atmosphere, increasing or diminishing its
barometric pressure, and indirectly the rise and
fall of the Earth in the waters.”
David Wardlaw Scott, “Terra Firma” (259-260)
“Bearing this fact in mind, that there exists a
continual pressure of the atmosphere upon the
Earth, and associating it with the fact that the
Earth is a vast plane ‘stretched out upon the
waters,’ and it will be seen that it must of
necessity slightly fluctuate, or slowly rise and
fall in the water. As by the action of the atmosphere the Earth is slowly depressed, the water moves towards the receding shore and produces the flood tide; and when by the reaction
of the resisting oceanic medium the Earth gradually ascends the waters recede, and the ebb
tide is produced. This is the general cause of
tides. Whatever peculiarities are observable
they may be traced to the reaction of channels,
bays, headlands, and other local causes … That
the Earth has a vibratory or tremulous motion,
such as must necessarily belong to a floating
and fluctuating structure, is abundantly proved
by the experience of astronomers and surveyors.
If a delicate spirit-level be firmly placed upon
a rock or upon the most solid foundation which
it is possible to construct, the very curious
phenomenon will be observed of constant change
in the position of the air-bubble. However care-
12
fully the ‘level’ may be adjusted, and the instrument protected from the atmosphere, the
‘bubble’ will not maintain its position many
seconds together. A somewhat similar influence
has been noticed in astronomical observatories,
where instruments of the best construction and
placed in the most approved positions cannot always be relied upon without occasional re-adjustment.”
Dr. Samuel Rowbotham, “Earth Not a Globe, 2nd
Edition” (108-110)
“Astronomers have indulged in imagination to
such a degree that the moon is now considered to
be a solid, opaque spherical world, having mountains, valleys, lakes, or seas, volcanic craters, and other conditions analogous to the surface of the earth. So far has this fancy been
carried that the whole visible disc has been
mapped out, and special names given to its various peculiarities, as though they had been
carefully observed, and actually measured by a
party of terrestrial ordinance surveyors. All
this has been done in direct opposition to the
fact that whoever, for the first time, and without previous bias of mind, looks at the moon's
surface through a powerful telescope, is puzzled
to say what it is really like, or how to compare
it with anything known to him. The comparison
which may be made will depend upon the state of
mind of the observer. It is well known that persons looking at the rough bark of a tree, or at
the irregular lines or veins in certain kinds of
marble and stone, or gazing at the red embers in
a dull fire will, according to the degree of
activity of the imagination, be able to see many
13
different forms, even the outlines of animals
and of human faces. It is in this way that persons may fancy that the moon's surface is broken
up into hills and valleys, and other conditions
such as are found on earth. But that anything
really similar to the surface of our own world
is anywhere visible upon the moon is altogether
fallacious.”
Dr. Samuel Rowbotham, “Zetetic Astronomy, Earth
Not a Globe!” (335)
14
För mer information om Månen och Jorden besök:
http://jorden.info
Köp e-böcker:
Zetetic Astronomy. Earth Not a Globe!
Zetetic Cosmogony
Terra Firma : The Earth Not a Planet