From www.bloodjournal.org by guest on November 19, 2014. For personal use only. 1994 84: 1116-1123 Clustering of vitronectin and RGD peptides on microspheres leads to engagement of integrins on the luminal aspect of endothelial cell membrane A Zanetti, G Conforti, S Hess, I Martin-Padura, E Ghibaudi, KT Preissner and E Dejana Updated information and services can be found at: http://www.bloodjournal.org/content/84/4/1116.full.html Articles on similar topics can be found in the following Blood collections Information about reproducing this article in parts or in its entirety may be found online at: http://www.bloodjournal.org/site/misc/rights.xhtml#repub_requests Information about ordering reprints may be found online at: http://www.bloodjournal.org/site/misc/rights.xhtml#reprints Information about subscriptions and ASH membership may be found online at: http://www.bloodjournal.org/site/subscriptions/index.xhtml Blood (print ISSN 0006-4971, online ISSN 1528-0020), is published weekly by the American Society of Hematology, 2021 L St, NW, Suite 900, Washington DC 20036. Copyright 2011 by The American Society of Hematology; all rights reserved. From www.bloodjournal.org by guest on November 19, 2014. For personal use only. Clustering of Vitronectin and RGD Peptides on Microspheres Leads to Engagement of Integrins on the Luminal Aspect of Endothelial Cell Membrane By Adriana Zanetti, Grazia Conforti, Sibylle Hess, In& Martin-Padura, Elena Ghibaudi, Klaus T. Preissner, and Elisabetta Dejana In previous work (Conforti et al. Blood 80:437,1992). we have shown that integrins in endothelial cells (EC) are not polarized to the basal cell membrane, but are also exposed on the apical cell surface, in contact with blood. Therefore, endothelial integrins might be available for binding circulating plasmaproteins.Howeversolubleplasmavitronectin (vn) bound very poorlyto EC apical surfaceand this interaction was unaffected by Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) peptides oran anti-avp3 serum. In contrast, beads(diameter, 4.5 pm) coupled with plasmavnassociated to EC apicalsurfacein a time- and concentration-dependent way. Addition of antibodies directed to vn, avp3, and RGD-containing peptides blocked the interaction ofvnbeads with EC. In contrast, heparinandantibodiesdirected to avp5 and p 1 integrin chain had no effect. Beads coupled with Gly-Arg-Gly-AspSer-Pro boundto the EC surface, but not those coupledwith Gly-Arg-Gly-Glu-Ser-Pro. Thisinteraction was blockedby avp3 antibodies and RGD peptides, but not by avp5 antibody. Overall, these results indicate that luminal avp3 retains its bindingcapacityforsurface-linked vn and RGDcontaining ligands, but binding is observed only when the ligand is offered in a clustered,multivalent form. We propose boundto circuthat when vn or RGD-containing proteins are promoting lating cells, they can act asbridging molecules by adhesion ofthe cells to the endothelium via apical integrins. 0 1994 by The American Society of Hematology. T integrin receptors not only on their abluminal, but also on their luminal surface. The distribution of integrins on the endothelialhlood interface might be an important mechanism for binding plasma proteins and circulating cells on their surface. However, direct evidence that apically located endothelial integrins are functionally active is still lacking. To address this issue we investigated vitronectin (vn) binding to EC. Vn can bind to cells through at least two domains; the Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD sequence) located close to the aminoterminal domain of the molecule serves as binding site for integrins during cellular adhesion to immobilized vn, whereas the heparin-binding domain within the carboxytermina1 portion mediates binding of soluble vn complexes to c e k x Vn occurs in at least two conformational configurations: The plasma formthat is intramolecularly stabilized and does not expose the heparin-binding domain, and the multimeric form that, after treatment with urea or low pH, undergoes a conformational transition and exposes the cryptic heparin-binding site. The RGD sequence is apparently exposed on both forms and is notaffected by conformational changes of vn.'"" In the present report, we present evidence that integrins on the luminal aspect of EC can bind soluble vn neither in its plasma norinthe multimeric form. However, integrin binding could be detected when vn was present in a highly aggregated state or immobilized onbeads. Thus, because specific binding of the circulating plasma form of vn to EC is very weak, if existent at all, EC integrins might discriminate between soluble and clustered forms of RGD ligands. HE ENDOTHELIUM is the innermost lining of the entire cardiovascular system and forms a crucial permselective barrier between bloodand the underlying tissues. Like other types of epithelia, endothelial cells (EC) are functionally polarized. The luminal front of EC facing the blood is continuously exposed to circulating cells and plasma components, whereas the opposite abluminal side is in contact withthe extracellular matrixand the surrounding tissues. The EC luminal surface can modulate important processes such as binding and inactivatiodactivation of many elements of the coagulation and fibrinolytic systems.'.' In addition, EC can apically expose adhesive receptors for circulating EC adhesion to the subendothelium is mediated by specific adhesive receptors located on the basal aspect of the membrane. Mostof these belong to the integrin family of adhesive molecules' and specifically recognize and bind subendothelial components. In previous investigations we have shown, by multiple experimental approaches in vitro and in situ,' that ECexpose From lstituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, Milano, Italy; CEA, Laboratoire d'Hematologie, Department de Biologie Moleculaire et Structurale, INSERM U217, CEN-G,Grenoble, France; and Haemostasis Research Unit, Kerckhoff-Klinik ManPlanck-Institut, Bad Nauheirn, Germany. Submitted October 15, 1993; accepted April 11, 1994. Supported by The Italian National Research Council (P. F. Applicazioni Cliniche della Ricerca Oncologica), Telethon Project No. A.03, Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro, and by Commission of the European Communities (BRIDGE: BIOT-CT90-0195). I.M.P. is a recipient of a Science Plan of European Communities fellowship. Address reprint requests to Adriana Zunetti, MD, Instituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, Via Eritrea 62, 20157 Milano, Italy. The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. 0 1994 by The American Society of Hematology. 0006-4971/94/8404-0022$3.00/0 1116 MATERIALS AND METHODS Materials. Chemical reagents were purchased from the following sources: bovine serum albumin (BSA), unfractionated heparin sodium salt from porcine intestinal mucosa, insulin-transfenin-sodium selenite media supplement for cell culture, antimouse polyclonal IgG-peroxidase conjugate, crystal violet, o-phenylenediamine dihydrochloride, TRIS (hydroxymethyl) aminomethane, 2-deoxy-Dglucose, Tween-20 (polyoxyethylenesorbitan monolaurate) (Sigma Chemical Co., St Louis, MO); heparan sulfate was a kind gift from Dr L. A. Fransson, University of Lund, Lund, Sweden; culture reagents (GIBCO, Paisley, UK); tissue culture plates and flasks (Falcon, Becton Dickinson Labware, NJ, and Costar, Cambridge, MA); Blood, VOI 84, NO 4 (August 15). 1994: pp 1116-1 123 From www.bloodjournal.org by guest on November 19, 2014. For personal use only. 1117 BINDING OF PLASMAVN-COATEDBEADS carrier-free NaIz5I(New England Nuclear, Boston, MA); paraformaldehyde, sucrose and urea (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) Diff-Quick fixing solution (Men + Dade AG, Dudingen, Switzerland); Dynal M-450, tosyl activated magnetic beads and Dynal magnetic device (Dynal AS, Oslo, Norway); IODO-GEN (Pierce Europe BV, OudBeijerland, The Netherlands); column PD-l0 (Pharmacia LKB Biotechnology, Uppsala, Sweden). Antibodies. Some of the antibodies usedin this study were kindly donated by the following investigators: anti-avg3 monoclonal antibody (MoAb) LM609 and anti-av MoAb LM142 under the form of ascitic fluid" by Dr D. A. Cheresh (The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA); anti-P3 MoAb 7E3 purified immunoglobulins (IgGs) by Dr B. S. Coller (State University of New York at Stony Brook); anti-Dl MoAb Lia ~upematant'~ by Dr F. Sanchez-Madrid (Hospital de la F'rincesa,Madrid, Spain); anti-vn MoAb 16A7 purifiedIgGs by Dr P. Declerck, (University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium). Rabbit sera raised by injecting placenta-purified avg3 and a5p1 receptors and anti-avp5 MoAb (clone P1F6)I4 under the form of ascitic fluid were from Telios, (Pharmaceuticals Inc, San Diego, CA). Irrelevant MoAbs (ascitic fluid or purified IgG) and preimmune rabbit serum were used as control. In blocking experiments we used antibody concentrations able to induce maximal effect as reported in the pertinent references. Anti-vn MoAb BVI and MoAb BV2, supernatants and purified IgGs, were prepared in our laboratory by standard hybridoma techniques using purified human denatured vnas immunogen. The MoAbs were characterized by their ability to bind purified vn in the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) technique" (see Fig 1, A and B) and by immunoprecipitation" (not shown). The ELISA technique was performed essentially as des~ribed.'~ Briefly, microtiter wells were coated with 30 pL of 7 pg/mL solution of either plasma vn and multimeric vn in carbonate bicarbonate buffer pH 9.6 and incubated overnight at 4°C in humidified chamber. Plates were washed three times with 0.05% Tween 20 in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 0.5% BSA and then incubated with the same buffer containing 1% BSA (100 &/well) for 1 hourat 37°C. After wash, the plates were incubated with different concentrations of anti-vn: MoAbs BV1, BV2, and nonimmune mouse IgGs (0.001 to 50 pg/mL) in PBS 0.05% Tween 20 containing 0.5% BSA for 1 hour at room temperature. The wells were washed three times with PBS, incubated with peroxidase-conjugate goat antimouse IgGs (0.15 pg/mL, 1 0 0 pL/ well) for 1 hour at room temperature. Binding of IgGs was quantified by addition of chromogenic substrate as described below for soluble vn binding to EC. As reported in Fig 1, A and B, MoAbs BVI and BV2 recognized vn bothin its plasma and denatured form. Recognition of plasma vn was slightly better than that of multimeric vn. MoAbs BV1 and BV2 showed a comparable activity. Both MoAbs BV1 and BV2 inhibited EC adhesion and spreading on vn-coated (7 pg/mL) substrates (Fig 1C). These assays have been previously described in detail." Briefly, wells were precoated with 7 pg/rnL of multimeric vn (2 hours at 37°C) residual protein binding sites on wells were saturated by further incubation with 1% BSA in PBS (30 minutes at 37°C). EC (18 X 103/well)in suspension were added to the wells in the presence of increasing concentration of MoAbs BVI, BV2, and nonimmune mouse IgGs. After 2 hours at 37°C unbound cells were removed by washing twice in PBS-Ca" Mg2' and adherent cells were fixed and stained with crystal violet as described." The number of adherent and spread cells was evaluated by phase-contrast microscopy (at least IO fields per well were counted). As reported in Fig IC, MoAb BV2 was more effective than MoAb BVl in inhibiting cell adhesion and spreading. By ELISA, MoAb BV 1 selectively recognized human vn, but not bovine vn (measured by coating the wells with undiluted bovine serum, not shown). O.D. 1.4 0.8 I." O.D. A 1.2 l 7 1.4 1.2 1 .o 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 O/O NI IgG 60 BV2 0 100 200 ANTIBODIES pg/ml Fig 1. Characterizationof MoAbs BV1 and BV2. Bindingof MoAbs B V l and BV2 to multimeric vn (A) and plasma vn(B).Increasing concentrations of MoAbs BV1 (A) and BV2 10)or nonimmune mouse lgGs (0) were addedto vn- (7 pg/mL) coatedplates for 1 hour at room temperature. The amount of antibody bound was then evaluated by ELISA technique as described in Materials and Methods. Values expressed in optical density (OD) are means If: SD of three replicates. (C) Effect of MoAbs BV1 and BV2 on EC adhesion and spreading to vn-coated substrate.EC adhasion assaywas performed as described previourly." EC in suspension were added to the wells in the presence of increasingconcentrationof BV1 (A, A), BV2 (0. and nonimmune mouse lgGs (0. 0).The number of adherent (A, U, 0) and spread U , m, 0 )cells was evaluated by phase-contrast microscopy. Values (means of two experiments performed in triplicate) are expressed as percentage of the number of cells adherent and spread in absence of antibodies. From www.bloodjournal.org by guest on November 19, 2014. For personal use only. 1118 Proteins and peptides. Humanplasma vn was purified under nondenaturing conditions as previously described.Ix Multimeric vn was prepared by incubating plasma vn for 1 hour at 37°C in 6 moll L urea followed by extensive dialysis against PBS. Plasma vn was radiolabeled with "'l by the iodogen procedure" reaching specific radioactivity of 1.4 pCi/pg protein. Synthetic hexapeptides Gly-ArgGly-Asp-Ser-Pro (GRGDSP) and Gly-Arg-Gly-Glu-Ser-Pro (GRGESP)wereeithersynthesized in our laboratory as described'" or purchased from Telios. The synthetic (cyclical) peptide GlyPen-Gly-Arg-Gly-Asp-Ser-Pro-Cys-Ala (GPenGRGDSPCA) was obtainedfromTelios.ThecyclicpeptidesGly-Pen-Arg-Ala-ArgGly-Asp-Asn-Pro-Cys-Ala (GPenRARGDNPCA) and Arg-PmcGly-His-Lys-Gly-Flu-Leu-Arg-Cys-Arg R(Pmc)GHKGELRCR were a kind gift of Dr J. F. Tschopp (Telios Pharmaceuticals Inc, San Diego, CA). GRGDSP and GRGESP coupled to albumin were prepared as described." EC culture. EC were isolated from normal-term umbilical cord veins by collagenase perfusion as previously described in detail." Cells were grown in tissue culture dishes coated with gelatin (0.5%) in 20% newborn calf serum-medium 199 supplemented with endothelial cell growth supplement (prepared from bovine brain) (50 p,g/ mL), heparin (100 pg/mL), and penicillin (100 U/mL)/streptomycin (100 pg/mL) and used between the second and the third passage. For binding assays, cells were seeded in gelatin-coated 96-microtiter wells and used at confluency (2 X IO4 cells/well). Gelatin was used because preliminary experiments showed that under these conditions, RGD peptides or anti-avp3 serum (within the time frame and concentrationsused in this study) did not induce a detectable detachment of the cells from the wells. Soluble vn binding to EC. Microtiter wells of confluent EC were incubated overnight with 1 0 0 pllwell of medium 199, 4% BSA, and 0.08% insulin-transferrin-sodium selenite supplement. Medium was then removed and cells were incubated with increasing amounts of either plasma vn or multimeric vn in 60 p1 medium 199,0.5% BSA, 0.01% sodium azide at 37°C. Sodium azide was included to prevent vn internalization. In a few experiments, plasma vn and multimeric vn were added to the cells in PBS-Ca" Mg", 0.5% BSA, 0.01% azide, and 2-deoxy-D-glucose (S0 mmol/L) with comparable results. Afterdifferentincubationtimes,medium was removed,thecells were fixed with 3% paraformaldehyde and 2% sucrose in PBS (15 minuteroomtemperature).Fixation was required to preventcell detaching from the culture wells during the following washes. After or the same concentrathree washes in PBS, MoAb BVI (25 pg/mL) tion of irrelevant MoAb IgGs in PBS (60 pL/well) were added for 2 hoursatroomtemperature.Afterrinsing in PBS,peroxidaseconjugated goat-antimouse IgGs (0.15 pg/mL) were applied for 90 minutesatroomtemperature in 60pL/well of PBS.Afterthree washes,thechromogenicsubstrateo-phenylene-diaminedihydrochloride was diluted as indicated by the manufacturer and 100 pL of this solution was added for 30 minutes at room temperature. The rate of color development at 30 minutes was measured at 450 nm in an automated micro plate lambda reader (Perkin-Elmer. Brachburg, NJ). In each experiment, the binding of MoAb BVI to the cells in the absence of exogenous vn was evaluated. This value, considered as background was subtracted from each measurement. Binding ofaggreguted vn to EC. ConfluentECmonolayers in 48-well culture plates were incubated overnight in serum-free medium containing 0.5% BSA and insulin-transferrin-sodium selenite supplement as described above. The cells were rinsed twice with BSA-containing serum-free medium and were further incubated at 37°C with 200 pL of serum-free medium/0.2% BSA containing 330 ng/mL'ZSI-labeledaggregated vn, which wasobtained by boiling 3 minutes before the binding experiments. radiolabeled plasma vn for As competitorsGPenGRGDSPCA ( I to 100 pmol/L),GPenRA- ZANETTI ET AL RGDNPCA (200 pmol/L) and RPrncGHKGELRCR (200 pmol/L), heparin (500 pg/mL) and heparan sulfate (8 pmoUL) were included in the binding solution. After 4 hours incubation time, binding mewashed 3 times with dium was removedandthecelllayerwas serum-free medium/0,2% BSA. Cells and matrix were solubilized by incubating the cell layer with 1 mol/L NaOH for l hour at room temperature and counted. Coating beads with vn and ulbumin-coupledpeptides. Approximately 10' magnetic beads (diameter, 4.5 pm) were taken from the stock undiluted suspension" and added to1 mL of 0.05 molL borate buffer, pH 9.5 containing ( I ) different concentrations of plasma vn (0.024 to 320 pg/mL), (2) BSA-linked GRGDSP or GRGESP peptide (corresponding to 9 to 14 ng peptide1246 pg BSNmL), and (3) BSA alone (246 pg/mL). The mixture was then incubated 16 to 18 hours by slow end-over-end rotation atroomtemperature. At the end of incubation, unreacted tosyl groups were blocked by reaction with 1 mL of 0.05 mol/L TRIS-HCI buffer pH 9.6. The buffer was then removedusingtheDynalmagneticdeviceandbeadswere washed four times with 1 mL TRIS-HCI buffer and once with sterile Hank's Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS). The amount ofvn bound to beads was quantified by including trace amounts of "'l-vn, (1.5 X IO" cpm in 100 p L of the protein solution) in the protein-binding buffer. After the binding (see above) beads were washed and counted in a gamma counter. Binding o f profein-coated beads to EC. Different concentrations of vn. GRGDSP, or GRGESPlinkedtoBSAandBSA-coupled beads in 60 pL/well of medium 199,0.S% BSA, and 0.01% sodium azide were added to confluent EC. After various timesof incubation at 3 7 T , the bead solution was aspirated and the wells were washed twice with PBS containing Ca2" and Mg". Cells were then fixed with Diff-Quick (100 pL/well) for 3 minutes, stained with crystal violet (0.5% in 20% methanol solution) for 5 minutes and washed twice with distilled water. These procedures were all done at room temperature. The beads adhering to the cell surface were countedby phase contrast microscopy. At least 10 fields per well were counted (corresponding to about 300 cells at confluency). RESULTS We first measured the binding of soluble plasmavn to EC monolayers. To more selectively evaluate vn binding to the apical cell surface an ELISA set-up was used. Binding of vn to receptors located on thebasal aspect of the cell membrane would be poorly detected by this assay because preliminary data showed that, because of their high molecular weight IgG cannot effectively traverse EC cell-to-cell junctions. As reported in Fig 2, purified soluble vn bound very little to confluent EC monolayers. This association was not dependent on vn concentration in the medium (Fig 2) or time of incubation (in the range of 5 to 120 minutes, not shown). Heparin (up to 570 pg/mL), GRGDSP peptides (up t o 800 pmol/L), and anti-avp3 serum (up to 0.02 dilution) added during thebindingassay did not affect vn binding (not shown). For comparison, wetested the binding of multimeric vn,theheparin binding form of the adhesive protein. As reported in Fig 2 , multimeric vn associated to EC in a concentration-dependent way. Time-course experiments showed that at 30 pg/mL, the binding of multimeric vn was already apparent at 5 minutes and reached the equilibrium at 1 hour (not shown). As reported in Fig 2, heparin blocked binding of multimeric vn to the cells, but similar to plasma vn, no effect was found by GRGDSP peptides (up to 800 pmo1L) and anti-avb3 serum (up to 0.02 dilution) (not shown). From www.bloodjournal.org by guest on November 19, 2014. For personal use only. 1119 BINDING OF PLASMA VN-COATEDBEADS These results were in agreement with previously published data24.25 and did not support the hypothesis that integrins on EC luminal surface can bind soluble vn. However, modification of vn by heating resulted in aggregated forms of the protein (reaching mw greater than 10') that could associate to EC monolayers in an RGD-dependent way. As reported in Fig 3, unlike multimeric vn, heparin or heparan sulfate were ineffective in competing for the aggregated vn binding. In contrast, the RGD containing cyclic peptides were able to substantially reduce binding of the aggregated form of vn to about 20% of control suggesting major involvement of integrins in this interaction. These data were also supported by the concentration dependence of RGD peptides with half maximal inhibition at about 7 pmollL. Under these conditions, cells did not detach from their substratum. Compared with 37"C, less than 20% total binding of aggregated vn was observed at 4"C, suggesting that active metabolism was required for integrin-mediated recognition (data not shown). Overall, these data suggested that integrins could be involved in vn binding whenthe density of the ligand was sufficiently high. To further investigate this point, plasma vn was linked to beads andthebead suspension added to confluent EC monolayers. The beads (diameter, 4.5 pm) were large enough to be counted directly using phase-contrast microscopy when attached on EC surface (Fig 4). As reported in Fig 5 , vn-bead binding to EC was dependent on ( l ) time of incubation, reaching a plateau at 60 minutes (A); ( 2 ) the number of beads added (B); and (3) the concentration of vn present on the bead surface (C). The minimal vn concentration able to give a detectable binding was in the range of 0.3 to 0.5 X ghead. Irrelevant binding of albumin-coated beads was observed (less than 6 beads per 10' cells adding 5 X IO5 beads/mL for up to 120 minutes incubation, Fig 4C). The mechanism of vn-bead binding to EC was further established by competition assays. 0.0 0 10 20 30 40 C19/ml Fig 2. Binding ofsolubleplasmavn and multimeric vn to EC monolayers. Increasingconcentrationsof multimeric vn (U) or were added to cultured EC for 60 minutes at 37°C. plasma vn 11. Heparin (57 pg/mL) ( A ) was added to multimeric vn during the binding assay. Data are means ? SEM of three separate experiments. a z 400001 3 32000 A 3 z? i: k5 $2 (3 CY < 24000 16000 8000 0 n z-J zo >U 0 i 10 100 PEPTIDE (PM) Fig 3. Binding of aggregated vn to EC. Radiolabeled aggregated vn (330 ng/mL; 200.000 cpm amount of radioactivity per well) was incubated for 4 hours at 37°C with confluent cell monolayers. (A) Binding of '%aggregated vn was performed in the absence or presence of 100 pmol/L cyclic peptides as indicated as well as heparin (500 pg/mL) and heparan sulfate(8 pmollL). (B) Binding of '%aggregated vn was followed in the presence ofdifferent concentrations of the cyclic RGD peptide (GPenGRGDSPCA)1.1 and control peptide RlPmc) GHKGELRCR IO). Data (means k SD, n = 3) are representative of four separate experiments. As reported in Fig 6, anti-avp3 serum blocked vn-bead binding toEC, whereas anti-a5/31 serum was ineffective. Table 1 reports the effect of other agents on vn-bead binding. Two anti-vn MoAbs able to inhibit EC adhesion to vn (16A7 and BV2) blocked vn-bead binding. Two inhibitory MoAbs, LM609 directed to avP3 and 7E3 directed to P3,"." inhibited vn-bead binding, whereas the nonblocking MoAbs LM142, directed to av," P1F6 (blocking MoAb, directed to av/35),I4 and Lia L/2 (blocking MoAb, directed to pl)" were inactive. Finally, the cyclic GPenGRGDSPCA (but not GRGESP) peptide inhibited vn-bead binding to EC (see also Fig 4), whereas heparin, up to 570 pg/mL was without effect. To further investigate the presence of recognition sites for RGD ligands on the apical surface of EC, binding of albumin-linked GRGDSP and GRGESP peptides coated to beads was studied. GRGDSP, but not GRGESP-coated beads significantly bound to EC in a time-dependent manner reaching From www.bloodjournal.org by guest on November 19, 2014. For personal use only. ZANElTI ET AL 1120 3 J W V (U 0 r- 3j n 4m 20 0 40 60 80 100 120 140 TIME (min) 500- 3 J W V (U 0 r- 300 200 - 4 m 100 - '3 .i; J W V (U 0 Y Fig 4. Light microscopy analysis of plasma vn-coated bead binding t o €C. Phase-contrast microscopy of EC incubated with plasma vn-coated beads (lo6beadslmLfor 60 minutes at37°C) in the absence (a) or presence of GPenGRGDSPCA (400pmol/L) Ib) and EC incubated with BSA-coated beads (c). Cells were fixed with Diff-Quick and stained with crystal violet. 400 - G n ,. . B 3j n a W m 100 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 10 - l 3 g/BEAD a plateau at 2 hours (Fig 7A). The binding was blocked by anti-avp3 serum, LM609 and 7E3 MoAbs (directed to a v o 3 and 03, respectively), and GRGDSP and GPenGRGDSPCA peptides, whereas MoAbs PIF6 (directed to cuv/3S) and Lia '/? (directed to 01) were inactive (Fig 7B). DISCUSSION The major finding of this paper is that apically located EC integrins (and inparticular a v 0 3 ) retaintheir biologic function andbind surface-linked vnand RGD peptides. In Fig 5. Binding of plasma vn-coated beads t o EC. (A) Time course of vn-bead binding t o €C. Beads (3.3 x 105/mL)coated with vnwere added t o confluent EC monolayers for different times at 37°C. (B) Binding of vn beads t o EC in function ofbead concentration. Different numbers ofvn-coated beads were added t o confluent EC for 60 minutes at 37T. (C) Binding of vn beads t o EC in function of vn concentration on beads. The binding of vn-coated beads (3.3 x 105/mL, for 60 minutes at37°C) was dependent on theamount of vn linkedt o the bead surface. Different concentrations of vn (0.024 t o 320 pglmLl were used in the bead coupling buffert o obtain different concentrations of the protein on the bead surface. The beads bound were counted directly on the EC surface by phase-contrast microscopy. Data are means 2 SEM of three separate experiments. From www.bloodjournal.org by guest on November 19, 2014. For personal use only. 1121 BINDING OF PLASMAVN-COATEDBEADS - 2 100 l0 80 - a 60 - 40 20 1 O . 'O 0 0 0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10 ANTISERUM DILUTIONS Fig 6. Effect of anti-mp3 and anti-a5pl sera on plasma vn-coated bead bindingto EC. Vn-beads (3.3x 106/mL)were added to confluent EC monolayen for 80 minutes at 37°C in the presence of increasing concentrations of a n t i e p 3 (.l and antia5pl sera (0).Data are means of three separate experiments. Rerub ara expressed as the percentage of bead binding in the presence of nonimmune serum. different types of cell-binding mechanisms depending on their conformation. For instance, only when it is coated on a surface and treated by reducing agents, thromb~spondin~~ canbind avP3, presumably by exposure of its otherwise hindered RGD domain. Thrombin can be bound by avp3 through its RGD domain only when the molecule is modified by different treatment^.^" In addition, integrins bind more effectively to their specific ligands when they are allowed to cluster or bind to a ~ u r f a c e , ~and " ~ ~this appears to be correlated with ligand d e n ~ i t y . ~ ~ . ~ ~ Interestingly, whereas heparin was most effective in inhibiting soluble multimeric/denaturated vn binding, it did not change the interaction of vn-coated beads with EC. This suggests that if a change in conformation occurs, the heparinbinding domain remains hindered or not available for promoting adhesion. Thus, vn linked to beads presents different features than multimeric soluble vn. The biologic relevance of the binding of vn beads to EC outlined in this work remains to be elucidated. Circulating cells, including tumor cells and bacteria37can bindvnin different ways and mediate adhesion of the latter to EC?* Vn bound to beads can be taken as a model system for vn association with cell surfaces. Thereby, vn might be recognized by the luminal EC integrins and thus, act as a bridge between circulating cells and the endothelium. Tumor cell adhesion to EC was found in fact to be dependent on surfaceexposed avp3.39,40 The observation reported here that RGD-coated beads can also bind to the luminal surface of EC suggests that besides vn, other RGD containing proteins (such as fibrinogen, von Willebrand factor or fibronectin) can associate to the endothelium whenbound to circulating cells. Fibrinogen is of particular interest because it contains two times three puta- agreement with previous work?25 we were unable to show the involvement of EC integrins in binding soluble vn. We found that multimeric vn could bind to EC, but this association appeared to be entirely dependent on the heparin binding and not the RGD domain of the molecule. In addition, polyclonal antibodies to avo3 did not modify this type of interaction, indicating that vn binding integrins (see below) were not implicated in this association. Surprisingly, we found that high-Mr aggregated forms of vn bound to EC in an RGD-dependent manner. These data suggest that clustered forms (greater than lo6) are able to engage luminally expressed integrins, whereas multimeric vn (Mr, 0.5 to 1 X lo6) is not. Moreover, in aggregated vn, Table 1. Effect of Competitors on vn-Bead Bindingto €C no heparidheparan sulfate Competition in binding to EC Competitor Concentration BeadsllO' Cells 96 Inhibition was found, although this clustered ligand possesses heparinNA 103 2 10 NA None binding capacity. It remains to be established whether addi8 t 1 92 BV2 0.1 (dil) tional nonintegrin cell surface binding sites may account for 70 16A7 31 t 3 50 (pg/mL) scavenging aggregated vn, and whether these "scavengingLM 609 61 -t 7 41 0.05 (dil) type" binding sites may act in cooperation with integrins to LM 142 172 2 52 0 0.05 (dil) recognize (and possibly internalize) clustered vn. 7E3 55 2 7 47 20 (pg/mL) To further investigate whether clustered vn could be recLia 1/2 103 t 27 0 0.1 (dill ognized by EC integrins, vn was linked to microbeads. Vn P1F6 106 t 15 0 0.005 (dil) GPenGRGDSPCA 73 2 9 30 50 (pmol/L) immobilized on beads significantly bound to the EC apical 200 45 t 6 57 surface inan RGD, butnot heparin-dependent way. The 55 2 6 45 400 integrin receptor involved in this association is most likely 0 114 t 12 800 GRGESP (pmol/L) avP3 because vn-bead binding is blocked by anti-avp3 se7 96 t 9 Heparin 570 (pg/mL) rum. The other integrin receptors that can bind vn, 0 v P 1 , ~ ~ and avP514.2?,28 are not expressed in detectable amounts in Vn-coated beads (3.3 x 105/mL)were added to confluent EC monohuman umbilical vein EC.7 In addition, blocking antibodies directed to P I and avP5 (Fig 6 and Table 1) did not modify vn-bead binding to EC, thus further indicating that these integrins do not play a significant role in this interaction. The reason why avo3 recognizes vn only when it is immobilized on surfaces is intriguing. This phenomenon could be caused by a change in the ligand conformation and/or to an increase in its local density. Other integrin ligands present layers for 60 minutes at 37°C in the presence or absence of inhibitors. BV2. anti-vn MoAb; 16A7, anti-vn MoAb; LM609 anti-avo3 MoAb; LM142 anti-uv MoAb: 7E3, anti-83 MoAb; Lia 1/2 anti-81 MoAb; P1F6 anti-avp5 MoAb. Blocking antibodies were used at concentrations able to produce maximal inhibitory activity in appropriate assays. Percent inhibition was calculated by comparing binding of beads in the absence and presence of competitors. Data are means ? SEM of three experiments. Abbreviations: NA, not applicable; dil, dilution. From www.bloodjournal.org by guest on November 19, 2014. For personal use only. 1122 ZANElTI ET AL 250 v) j 200 W cu 0 150 100 0 2m 50 n- 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 TIME (min) 280 300 B T GRGDSP anti-avp3 LM609 7E3 P1F6 Abs tive available integrin recognition domains4’ and has been shown to act as bridging molecule in the adherence of bacteria to EC4’ In addition, fibrinogen mediates platelet binding to avfl3-transfected Chinese Hamster Ovary cells by bridging aIIb-@3and a ~ f l 3 . Therefore, 4~ fibrinogen bound to activated platelets or to other cell types could be recognized and bound by endothelial av@3and help to localize circulating cells to the intact vascular surface. In addition to EC integrins, ICAM-1 has been found to act as a fibrinogen receptor that thereby acts as bridging molecule between leukocytes and EC.44 Interestingly, ICAM-1 antibodies only partially inhibited fibrinogen-mediated adhesion of leukocytes to resting EC suggesting that additional adhesive mechanisms contribute to this effect. REFERENCES 1. Gimbrone MA Jr: Vascular endothelium: Nature’s blood con- tainer, in Gimbrone MA Jr (ed): Vascular Endothelium in Hemostasis and Thrombosis. Edinburgh, UK, Churchill Livingstone, 1986, P1 2. Miles LA, Levin EG, Plescia J, Collen D, Plow EF: Plasminogen receptors, urokinase receptors, and their modulation on human endothelial cells. Blood 72:628, 1988 3. Bevilacqua MP, Nelson RM: Selectins. J Clin Invest 91:379, I993 Liall2 GPenGRG GRGDSP DSPCA PEPTIDES Fig 7. Binding of GRGDSP and GRGESP linked to BSAcoated beads to €C. (A) Time course of beads coated with albumin-linked GRGDSP l.) or GRGESP (0).Beads (3.3 x lo5/ mL) were added to EC at 37°C. (B) GRGDSP bead (3.3 x 10’lrnL) binding was also evaluated in the presence of competitors added during the binding assay (120 minutes at 37°C): anti-rYvp3 serum (0.005 dilution), LM609 a n t i d o 3 Mob (0.0016 dilution), 7E3 anti-fl3 MoAb (25 pa/ mL), P1F6 a n t i - m p MoAb (0.005 dilution), Lia ‘h anti-81 MoAb (0.1 dilution), GPenGRGDSPCA cyclic peptide (400 pmollL), and GRGDSP (400 pmollL). Data are means 2 SEM of three separate experiments. Nonimmune rabbit serum and nonimmune ascitic fluid or nonimmune purified IgG were ineffective (not shown). 4. Osborn L: Leukocyte adhesion to endothelium in inflammation. Cell 62:3, 1990 5. Mantovani A, Bussolino F, Dejana E: Cytokine regulation of endothelial cell function. FASEB J 6:2591, 1992 6. Hynes RO: Integrins: Versatility, modulation, and signaling in cell adhesion. Cell 69:11, 1992 7. Conforti G, Dominguez-Jimenez C, Zanetti A, Gimbrone MA, Cremona 0, Marchisio PC, Dejana E: Human endothelial cells express integrin receptors on the luminal aspect of their membrane. Blood 80:437, 1992 8. F’reissner KT: Structure and biological role of vitronectin. Ann Rev Cell Biol 7:275, 1991 9. Tomasini BR, Mosher DF: Conformational states of vitronectin: Preferential expression of an antigenic epitope when vitronectin is covalently and non-covalently complexed with thrombin-antithrombin 111 or treated with urea. Blood 72:903, 1988 10. Izumi M, Yamada KM, Hayashi M: Vitronectin exists in two structurally and functionally distinct forms in human plasma. Biochim Biophys Acta 990:101, 1989 11. Cheresh DA, Smith JW, Cooper HM, Quaranta V: A novel vitronectin receptor integrin (crvpx) is responsible for distinct adhesive properties of carcinoma cells. Cell 5759, 1989 12. Charo IF, Bekeart S, Phillips D R Platelet glycoprotein IIbIIIa like proteins mediate endothelial cell attachment to adhesive proteins and the extracellular matrix. J Biol Chem 262:9935, 1987 13. Campanero MR, Arroyo AG, Pulido R, Ursa A, de Matias MS, Shnchez-Mateos P, Kassner PD, Chan BMC, Hemler ME, Corbi From www.bloodjournal.org by guest on November 19, 2014. For personal use only. BINDING OF PLASMA VN-COATED BEADS AL, de LandLuri MO, Sanchez-Madrid F: Functional role of a2Pl and a4b1 integrins in leukocyte intercellular adhesion induced through the common 8 1 subunit. Eur J Immunol22:3111, 1992 14. Wayner EA, Orlando RA, Cheresh DA: Integrins avp3 and avP5 contribute to cell attachment to vitronectin but differentially distribute on the cell surface. J Cell Biol 113:919, 1991 15. Engvall E Enzyme immunoassay ELISA and EMIT. Methods Enzymol 70:419, 1981 16. Conforti G, Zanetti A, Pasquali-Ronchetti I, Quaglino D, Neyroz P, Dejana E: Modulation of vitronectin receptor binding by membrane lipid composition. J Biol Chem 2654011, 1990 17. Dejana E, Colella S, Conforti G, Abbadini M, Gaboli M, Marchisio PC: Fibronectin and vitronectin regulate the organization of their respective Arg-Gly-Asp adhesion receptors in cultured human endothelial cells. J Cell Biol 107:1215, 1988 18. Preissner KT, Wassmuth R, Muller-Berghaus G: Physicochemical characterization of human S-protein and its function in the blood coagulation system. Biochem J 231:349, 1985 19. Fraker PJ, Speck JC Jr: Protein and cell membrane iodinations with a sparingly soluble chloroamide, 1,3,4,6-tetrachloro-3a, 6a-diphenylglycoluril. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 80:849, 1978 20. Conforti G , Zanetti A, Colella S, Abbadini M, Marchisio PC, Pytela R, Giancotti FG, Tarone G, Languino LR, Dejana E: Interaction of fibronectin with cultured human endothelial cells: Characterization of the specific receptor. Blood 73:1576, 1989 21. Harlow E, Lane D: Coupling peptides to carrier proteins using glutaraldehyde. Harlow E, Lane D (eds): Antibodies. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, 1988, p 78 22. Barbieri B, Balconi G, Dejana E, Donati MB: Evidence that vascular endothelial cells can induce the retraction of fibrin clots. Proc SOCExp Biol Med 168:204, 1981 23. Curtis ASG, McGrath M, Gasmi L: Localised application of an activating signal to a cell: Experimental use of fibronectin bound to beads and the implications for mechanisms of adhesion. J Cell Sci 101:427, 1992 24. Volker W, Hess S, Vischer P, Preissner KT: Binding and processing of multimeric vitronectin by vascular endothelial cells. J Histochem Cytochem 41:1823, 1993 25. Hess S, Stockmann A, Volker W, Preissner KT: Multimeric vitronectin: Structure and function, in Preissner KT, Rosenblatt S, Kost A, Wegerhoff J, Mosher DF (eds): Biology of Vitronectins and Their Receptors. Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Elsevier, 1993, p 21 26. Vogel BE, Tarone G, Giancotti FG, Gailit J, Ruoslahti E: A novel fibronectin receptor with an unexpected subunit composition (avbl). J Biol Chem 2655934, 1990 27. Vogel BE, Lee SJ, Hildebrand A, Craig W, Pierschbacher MD, Wong-Staal F, Ruoslahti E: A novel integrin specificity exemplified by binding of the avb5 integrin to the basic domain of the HIV Tat protein and vitronectin. J Cell Biol 121:461, 1993 28. Scalise Panetti T, McKeown-Longo PJ: The avP5 integrin receptor regulates receptor-mediated endocytosis of vitronectin. J Biol Chem 268: 11492, 1993 29. Sun X, Skorstengaard K, Mosher D F Disulfides modulate RGD-inhibitable cell adhesive activity of thrombospondin. J Cell Biol 118:693, 1992 1123 30. Bar-Shavit R, Sabbah V, Lampugnani MG, Marchisio PC, Fenton JW 11, Vlodavsky I, Dejana E: An Arg-Gly-Asp sequence within thrombin promotes endothelial cell adhesion. J Cell Biol 112:335, 1991 31. Grinnell F Fibroblast receptor for cell substratum adhesion: Studies on the interaction of baby hamster kidney cells with latex beads coated by cold insoluble globulin (plasma fibronectin). J Cell Biol 86:104, 1980 32. Savage B, Ruggeri ZM: Selective recognition of adhesive sites in surface-bound fibrinogen by glycoprotein IIb-IIIa on nonactivated platelets. J Biol Chem 266:11227, 1991 33. Coller BS: Interaction of normal, thromboasthenic, and Bernard-Soulier platelets with immobilized fibrinogen: Defective platelet-fibrinogen interaction in thromboasthenia. Blood 55:169, 1980 34. Massia SP, Hubbel JA: An RGD spacing of 440 nm is sufficient for integrin avb3-mediated fibroblast spreading and 140 nm for focal contact and stress fiber formation. J Cell Biol 114: 1089, 1991 35. Grinnell F, Geiger B: Interaction of fibronectin-coated beads with attached and spread fibroblasts. Exp Cell Res 162:449, 1986 36. Singer 11, Kawka DW, Scott S, Mumford RA, Lark MW: The fibronectin cell attachment sequence Arg-Gly-Asp promotes focal contact formation during early fibroblast attachment and spreading. J Cell Biol 104573, 1987 37. Chhatwal GS, Preissner KT, Muller-Berghaus G, Blobel H: Specific binding of human S protein (vitronectin) to streptococci, Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli. Infect Immun 55:1878, 1987 38. Valentin Weigand P, Grulich-Henn J, Chhatwal CS, MullerBerghaus G, Blobel H, Preissner K T Complement S protein (vitronectin) mediates the adherence of streptococci to human endothelial cells. Infect Immun 56:2851, 1988 39. Lafrenie RM, Podor TJ, Buchanan MR, Orr F W : Up-regulated biosynthesis and expression of endothelial cell vitronectin receptor enhances cancer cell adhesion. Cancer Res 52:2202, 1992 40. Tang DG, Grossi IM, Chen YQ, Diglio CA, Honn KV: 12(S)HETE promotes tumor-cell adhesion by increasing surface expression of ( ~ v b integrins 3 on endothelial cells. Int J Cancer 54:102, 1993 41. Doolittle RF, Watt KWK, Cottrell BA, Strong DD, Riley M: The amino acid sequence of the a-chain of human fibrinogen. Nature 280:464, 1979 42. Cheung AL, Krishnan M, Jaffe EA, Fischetti VA: Fibrinogen acts as a bridging molecule in the adherence of Staphylococcus aureus to cultured human endothelial cells. J Clin Invest 87:2236, 1991 43. Gawaz MP, Loftus JC, Bajt ML, Frojmovic MM, Plow EF, Ginsberg MH: Ligand bridging mediates integrin aIIbb3 (platelet GPIIB-IIIA) dependent homotypic and heterotypic cell-cell interactions. J Clin Invest 88:1128, 1991 44. Languino LR, Plescia J, Duperray A, Brian AA,Plow EF, Geltosky JE, Altieri DC: Fibrinogen mediates leukocyte adhesion to vascular endothelium through an ICAM-I -dependent pathway. Cell 73:l. 1993
© Copyright 2024