Review European Heart Journal (2007) 28, 929–940 doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehm015 Coronary sinus blood sampling: an insight into local cardiac pathophysiology and treatment? Rumi Jaumdally, Chetan Varma, Robert J. Macfadyen, and Gregory Y.H. Lip* Haemostasis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology Unit, University Department of Medicine, City Hospital, Birmingham B18 7QH, UK Received 27 November 2006; revised 9 February 2007; accepted 15 February 2007; online publish-ahead-of-print 29 March 2007 KEYWORDS Coronary sinus; Circulating factors; Myocardial ischaemia Atherosclerosis remains the underlying cause of cardiovascular disease and is a dynamic process involving inflammation, haemostasis, endothelial dysfunction, and angiogenesis. Studies of circulating factors from peripheral blood can provide an insight into this pathophysiology but may remain indicative of a more generalized, systemic process. More localized interaction(s) within the heart may be better studied from coronary blood samples. Indeed, an increasing number of prospective studies show good correlation between indices of these processes and clinical outcomes. As local sampling offers a unique way of assessing the local cardiac milieu, this may prove useful in the monitoring of both local/systemic drug therapies and interventional technologies. Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death and disability in the developed world.1,2 Of those aged less than 65 years, CVD currently accounts for 30% of all deaths3 and substantially contributes to the escalating cost of health care.4 However, the differentiation between coronary and linked vascular death attributable to generalized atherosclerosis (for example, stroke) is less well defined. Population studies have developed scoring systems in an attempt to define risk of future events but these are frequently linked to generalized atherosclerosis than specific coronary event rates. Thus these include generalized population vascular event rate associated with both immutable [age, gender, and family history of premature coronary artery disease (CAD)] and modifiable factors (such as hypertension, diabetes, smoking, and lipid profile).5 Atherosclerosis, the underlying cause of CVD, is a dynamic process involving the pathophysiological processes of inflammation, haemostasis, endothelial dysfunction, and angiogenesis. Studies involving indices reflecting these processes, both from peripheral and the cardiac microcirculation, can provide an insight into this pathophysiology with potential prognostic benefits. One problem with the measurement of blood indices from the peripheral circulation is that measured levels may not reflect intracoronary levels and, instead, can be indicative of a more generalized, systemic process. Other methods to reflect the coronary (or intracardiac) micro-environment are therefore needed. * Corresponding author. Tel: þ44 121 507 5080; fax: þ44 121 554 4083; E-mail address: [email protected] In order to focus more clearly on the coronary vasculature, selective catheterization of the coronary circulation may be one approach. Coronary sinus (CS) catheterization, for example, is well established as a method to compare proposed myocardial protection strategies in cardiac surgery.6 In routine electrophysiological studies,7 access to the CS allows for diagnostic and therapeutic manoeuvres. Dependent upon their circulating kinetics and responsiveness, assays of these various pathophysiological indices obtained at CS sampling may offer enhanced sensitivity or specificity for coronary events, from assessments of the local intracardaic milieau to a lack of dilution effects. In this review article, we examine the role of measuring plasma indices (biomarkers) of inflammation, haemostasis, endothelial damage/dysfunction, and angiogenesis from the coronary circulation in the pathogenesis, treatment, and prognosis of myocardial ischaemic events. Search strategy We performed a search using electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and DARE) between 1966 and 2005. Medical subject headings ‘sinus’, ‘circulation’, ‘venous’, ‘intracardiac’, ‘sinus catheterisation’ were combined with ‘biomarkers’, ‘inflammation’, ‘thrombogenesis’, ‘angiogenesis’, ‘endothelium’ and ‘coronary’ ‘myocardium’, ‘heart disease’, and ‘atherosclerosis’, ‘atheroma’, ‘plaque’ and ‘ischaemia’. The search was limited to papers published in the English language and excluded studies involving electrophysiology only with no blood parameters quantified. The reference list of identified studies was scrutinized and relevant citations examined. & The European Society of Cardiology 2007. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: [email protected] Downloaded from by guest on November 20, 2014 Introduction 930 Methods to study the local cardiac circulation Figure 1 Anatomy of the coronary sinus and major cardiac veins. CS, coronary sinus; GCV great cardiac vein; PLVV, posterior left ventricular vein; ADV, anterior descending vein; MCV, middle cardiac vein; ACV, accessory cardiac vein; SCV, small cardiac veins. cardiac biology, the technique leaves scope for significant loss of sensitivity, which can influence biomarker definition. Myocardial ischaemia and angiographically normal coronary arteries Patients with cardiac syndrome X are complex but well defined and presumed to have recurrent ischaemia despite angiographically ‘normal’ vessels, although some have evidence of subintimal or non-obstructive atheroma.13 The pathogenesis of this clinical symptomatic subgroup remains unclear. Microvascular coronary dysfunction has been postulated as a potential mechanism of recurrent ischaemia.14 A range of surrogate investigations, such as magnetic resonance spectroscopy15 and positron emission tomography,16 reveal some supportive evidence of focal abnormalities of coronary perfusion (i.e. nuclear perfusion defects and restrictive regional blood flow patterns, respectively) in these patients. Buffon et al.17 used a panel of circulating coronary biomarkers to provide an insight into this phenomenon by analysing the differences between CS and aortic levels of hydroperoxides and conjugated dienes (which are two sensitive markers of ischaemia-reperfusion oxidative stress) in cardiac syndrome X patients.17 In this study (n ¼ 9), rapid atrial pacing was used to produce electrographic ST changes, with sustained release of these markers in the local circulation compared with a control group consisting of five asymptomatic patients with normal ECG, left ventricular volume, and normal coronary angiogram.17 Similarly, increased plasma concentrations of the powerful vasoconstrictor, endothelin-1 (ET-1), have been reported in the coronary circulation of such patients in response to atrial pacing, correlating with coronary microvascular dysfunction.18 Thus, these patients appear to react adversely in terms of their coronary efflux metabolism with signs of Figure 2 Accessory venous pathways of the heart. Downloaded from by guest on November 20, 2014 Though the venous system of the heart comprises variable anatomical branches, drainage is primarily via the CS into the right atrium (RA) (Figure 1). In addition to electrophysiological mapping and pacing, the CS can be cannulated and used to study changes in flow, temperature, and, more commonly, blood sampling. In this respect, it is important in the first instance to note that alternative venous pathways exist (Figure 2); they are generally not thought to contribute to significant venous drainage and thus, cannulation of the CS can give access to blood sampling and monitoring of heart metabolism. Sampling from the CS is usually achieved by retrograde cannulation of a central venous system (subclavian, internal jugular, brachial, or femoral vein). Further manipulation within the RA generally requires fluoroscopic imaging to allow for selective engagement of the main CS trunk. Specific catheters, some with heparin bonding and distal side-holes, together with transfemoral sheaths8–10 have been developed to facilitate cannulation and/or blood withdrawal from the CS without admixture with RA blood. The positioning of the catheter can be verified and recorded with anterograde and retrograde left coronary arterial contrast injection11 (Figures 3 and 4), although this does not guarantee RA admixture. Other methods used to confirm CS cannulation involved distal pressure assessment at the catheter tip, oxygen saturation, and blood flow analysis. It is therefore assumed that a CS blood sample thus obtained reflects venous cardiac metabolism. In particular, during regional ischaemic injury, sampling of CS blood does appear to define early and accurate measurements of myocardial metabolism, in contrast to concomitant peripheral blood assays which show no change.12 The accuracy and validity of these assumptions are critically dependent on careful techniques, selective cannulation, and avoidance of admixture. Sadly, this is rarely tested or confirmed in published reports. In summary, although selective coronary sampling appears simple and safe and clearly appropriate to define regional R. Jaumdally et al. Coronary sinus sampling and pathophysiology Figure 3 931 Radiographic views of the coronary sinus without and with anterograde contrast injection (antero posterior view). pacing induced a marked lactate release when intracoronary N (G)-monomethyl-L-arginine (a NO synthesis inhibitor) was infused, but this effect was not seen systemically.25 Thus, localized regional sampling was able to define the metabolic ischaemic response to regional infusion and revealed the higher NO dependence of the coronary circulation in hypertensive patients.25 Reversible myocardial ischaemia with stable coronary plaque Stable atherosclerotic CAD results in patients with chronic exertional chest pain owing to reversible myocardial ischaemia from an unmet oxygen demand secondary to an obstructive coronary stenosis.26 The biology of plaque formation is complex and results from an interaction of trigger factors and localized cellular endothelial damage/dysfunction and haemorrheological and inflammation abnormalities, together with modified lipid infiltration of subintimal tissues.23 Each of these mechanistic processes can contribute to a variable extent in individual coronary patients and each might be better defined by regional rather than generalized blood sampling. Endothelial function An intact vascular endothelium plays an important role in preserving arterial homeostasis by modulating NO production from its precursor, L-arginine, via the enzymatic action of endothelial NO synthase.27 This pathway regulates regional vascular tone via a wide range of mediators (such as prostacyclin, bradykinin, endothelin, and angiotensin II) that have vasodilatory or vasoconstrictive properties. NO also influences coagulation, platelet aggregation, and smooth muscle cell proliferation and migration.7,28,29 In addition, NO can act to inhibit the degenerative oxidation of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol,30 which is a key step in plaque infiltration and destabilization. Regional analyses of endothelial responsiveness specific to the coronary circulation might intuitively provide a more sensitive measure of the role of endothelial dysfunction Downloaded from by guest on November 20, 2014 regional ischaemia, presumed to be due to abnormal flow. How this relates to a standard exercise stress test, which is quite distinct from RA pacing-induced stress, is unknown. Importantly, this study did not reveal changes in the peripheral circulatory levels of these metabolic markers. Several studies have examined the thrombotic balance in the so-called cardiac syndrome X or linked presentations. For example, Oshima et al.19 found higher plasma fibrinopeptide A levels (reflecting an impaired local coagulation system), with evidence of increased platelet activation in CS sampling in patients with vasospastic coronary disease. In a later study, the same group reported that intracoronary acetyl-choline led to an enhanced CS-arterial gradient of measured soluble P-selectin (a marker of platelet activation) in patients with angiographically normal coronary arteries compared with those with visible atheroma.20 They suggested that the change in platelet activation seen on coronary sampling was associated with the level of cardiac ischaemia and even possibly, with myocyte necrosis. Abnormal endothelial-dependent and endothelialindependent relaxations,21,22 as well as glucose metabolism23 in the coronary circulation have also been described in symptomatic patients with exertional chest pain yet angiographically normal coronary anatomy, using local haemodynamic and rheological parameters. In the 1970s, Goldberg et al.24 compared two groups of patients with negative exercise test (one group had atypical pain and controls with no chest pain) and found a significant increase in cardiac arteriovenous lactate production (a measure of metabolic performance) and in blood flow in the former group with focal coronary artery spasm.24 Thus, despite near-normal angiography in both cohorts, CS indices provided a sensitive method to assess focal dysfunction in those with arterial vasospasm. Given the rapid intracardiac circulation, neurohormonal effectors, such as short-lived endogenous nitric oxide (NO, an endothelium-dependent vasodilator), can be estimated from CS samples but not from peripheral blood. For example, in one study of 12 patients with left ventricular hypertrophy and normal coronary angiography, rapid RA 932 Visualization of coronary sinus os during left coronary arterial angiography. and underlying coronary vasomotor regulation in stable patients.31,32 Both baseline levels and response to pharmacological vasodilators on epicardial vascular bed can be studied using CS oxygen saturation analyses.33 In patients with chronic symptomatic CAD, studies of CS effluent suggest raised intracardiac levels of soluble thrombomodulin34 in addition to other markers of endothelial damage/dysfunction.35 In some studies, these biomarker levels were correlated to the presence and angiographic severity of CAD, but this was not the case with peripheral blood sampling of the same markers. The functional response of the endothelium to chronic ischaemic stress can also be assessed using plasma levels of ET-1; for example, after prolonged pacing-induced ischaemia (mean 6 min), local levels of ET-1 were significantly elevated compared with peripheral blood, indicating localized cardiac synthesis and regional metabolic changes.36 Angiogenesis Chronic vascular disease involves well-defined stimuli to a range of vascular growth patterns characterized by new vessel proliferation. In CAD, these responses are intimately linked to the presence of viable but ischaemic myocardium and are controlled and mediated by a distinct range of biomarkers.37 One key growth factor associated with angiogenesis is vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Circulating peripheral plasma levels are widely documented as elevated in CAD38 and diabetic atherosclerosis.39 Endogenous cardiac release of angiogenic growth factors has been described in patients with stable chronic occluded and collateralized coronary arteries—findings not seen in peripheral samples. In one study, for example, CS sampling from seven patients with left coronary arterial occlusion revealed a four-fold increase in local VEGF levels compared with patients with non-occlusive coronary stenoses.40 Lambiaise et al.41 also showed an association of increased CS VEGF levels to coronary collateral flow index (a measure of degree of collateralization in the presence of single-vessel stenosis). Intracardiac sources of earlier precursors (circulating endothelial progenitor cells) were also found to be reduced in the presence of inadequate collaterals,42 and no such relationships were seen in peripheral blood samples. In acute myocardial injury and ventricular remodelling, the role of circulating VEGF appears less conclusive.43 This seems hardly surprising, as many other factors relating to the presence of occult collateralization are likely to dominate the ventricular response to infarction. Downloaded from by guest on November 20, 2014 Figure 4 R. Jaumdally et al. Coronary sinus sampling and pathophysiology Thrombogenesis Other atherosclerotic risk factors Cardiovascular risk factors such as hypertension, obesity, and impaired glucose metabolism are linked with CAD and myocardial ischaemia, with complex range of underlying pathophysiological mechanisms. Several metabolic and neurohormonal markers relevant to one or more of these states have been assessed in patients, using CS sampling. Adiponectin is a protein secreted by adipocytes with both anti-inflammatory properties56 and the potential to suppress atherosclerosis in relevant animal models.57 Systemic levels of adiponectin are lower in the presence of type 2 diabetes or CAD.58 Intracardiac adiponectin levels have also been shown to be reduced in diabetic patients (samples from the aortic and CS sites), with some evidence of transcardiac metabolism of adiponectin.59 With respect to regional circulatory control of coronary perfusion, CS cannulation may provide information on the direct role of factors of the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system (RAAS) in vasomotor regulation.60 Fairly predictably, local measurement of angiotensin II, together with intracardiac epinephrine levels, was associated with vasoconstriction during inducible ischaemia in patients with chronic CAD.61 Assessment of coronary blood flow responses confirms a role for angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition therapy in mediating coronary vasodilatation, independent of the presence or absence of CAD.62 Finally, measurement of CS blood may help in the definition of regional cardiac autonomic tone and sympathetic nervous responses, which appear to correlate with sudden death or worsening cardiac function in patients with pre-existing left ventricular failure.63 Myocardial ischaemia and unstable coronary plaque The factors which trigger coronary plaque destabilization and promote plaque rupture are of critical importance. Again with population studies, peripheral blood sampling has defined a range of indices reflecting pathophysiological processes, but the relative importance of each to individualized coronary events is less clear. As with stable disease, indices of activity within autonomic/neural, thrombotic, or inflammatory tone are likely to be more sensitive if derived from the relevant regional circulation, particularly if sampled during defined ‘disease instability’ (e.g. acute coronary syndromes) without the overt myocardial damage/loss seen with acute infarction. Plaque rupture is believed to be preceded by cap thinning and/or exposure of a core of lipid-laden activated macrophages which are highly thrombogenic to circulating platelets.64 The degree of plaque disruption (erosion, fissure, or ulceration) and the extent of overlying mural thrombus are key factors in the thrombogenic signal generated from a local arterial site. In addition, activation of macrophages, T-lymphocytes, and smooth muscle cells leads to the release of additional mediators, including adhesion molecules, cytokines, chemokines, and growth factors. The end-result may be myocardial ischaemia and infarction, depending on the duration of the thrombosis and the location of the associated endothelial dysfunction and vasoconstriction. Investigations using regional CS blood sampling have played an important role in providing a quantitative assessment of the various systems involved in the pathogenesis of acute coronary syndromes and help in identifying/optimizing new potential therapy areas. The key studies involving endogenous platelet activation and thrombogenesis under acute ischaemic conditions that have been conducted using CS samples are summarized in Table 1. It is well recognized that exposure of tissue factor, a cell-surface protein expressed by cells within a vulnerable plaque, can lead to activation of the coagulation/fibrinolytic pathways. In an investigation of patients with ACS, levels of tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) can be objectively measured on the basis of difference noted between aortic and CS levels, thus reflecting the intracoronary environment, and can be used in addressing future treatment.65 This ‘consumption’ of TFPI within the coronary circulation contributes directly to and regulates intracoronary thrombus activation. Downloaded from by guest on November 20, 2014 The association of abnormalities in thrombosis and vascular disease is well established.44,45 However, the specific linkage of peripheral blood sample changes in platelet function, coagulation, and fibrinolytic pathways to the stability and responses within the local coronary circulation is much less clear. Although systemic analysis of these systems has been widely investigated in CAD, their role in more regional sampling in patients may reveal more relevant associations. The difficulty with many haemostatic indices, whether of platelet or thrombotic origin, is that they are widely recognized as being abnormal in peripheral blood in a range of vascular diseases, independent of specific coronary involvement. The list of associations is large and crosses a range of conditions linked to CAD, such as peripheral arterial disease, diabetes mellitus, and myocardial infarction.46–48 Peripheral blood analyses of markers of platelet or thrombin activation in patients with CAD undergoing acute exercise stress do not show any changes in measured levels.49 In contrast, regional analyses of CS blood, from studies in the 1980s, confirm a potential role of regional platelet activation, prostaglandin production, and the effects of aspirin therapy in chronic stable CAD patients.42,50,51 Similarly, higher levels of thromboxane (associated with platelet activation), but not components of complement activation, were also found in this setting but not in peripheral blood.52 CS sampling also facilitates the analysis of regional therapeutic response to platelet inhibition. Montalescot et al.53 reported that CS blood assays of platelet-activating factor are unchanged during pacing, potentially eliminating its participation in thromboxane release; there was good thromboxane inhibition with low-dose aspirin (50 mg/day) both at rest and during reversible and brief ischaemic episodes.54 Furthermore, intracoronary assay of fibrinolysis has been studied in the context of cornary events in smokers compared with those who do not smoke. A lower level of tissue plasminogen activator activity (impaired local fibrinolysis) appears more pronounced in smokers with established coronary atheroma on vascular ultrasound, in keeping with a potential mechanistic link between smoking and CAD event.55 933 934 R. Jaumdally et al. Table 1 Examples of key studies analysing platelets activation and thrombosis markers during coronary sampling Reference Cases Hypothesis investigated Clinical implications Craft et al.120 19 PCI Rauch et al.121 30 PCI Heparin use led to a #PMP and contrast led to an "PMP; effect seen in the regional arterial samples only CS level of CD15 following PCI correlates with ISR Johansen et al.122 26 PCI Platelet activation using PMP in coronary circulation Interaction of leucocyte and platelets using adhesion molecule CD 15 PDGF and BTG Watkins et al.123 21 PCI Thrombin activity using Fibrinopeptide A (Fib A) Platelet activation using beta thromboglobulin Impaired local fibrinolysis Platelet activity (PDGF) Combination effect following PCI Coagulation pathway using TF, TAT complex, and pro-PF Fornitz et al. 124 19 PCI Mizuno et al. 125 43 PCI Mizuno et al. 126 35 PCI Coagulation and fibrinolysis 23 UA, 16 CSA Platelet and neutrophil interaction using CD62P Patel et al. 127 " levels of both PDGF and "BTG seen in aortic root and CS following PCI; only arterial changes correlate ISR " Fib A levels seen following heparin cessation in PCI and in AMI (effect seen earlier and disproportionate in CS sample) Regional BTG levels did not vary following PCI irrespective of heparin therapy Impaired cascade with "PAI-1/#tPA seen centrally PDGF" seen centrally Combination of above after PCI correlates with ISR All " ( TF, TAT, PF) with PCI; association of local coagulation cascade (TF level at 24 h) correlates with ISR following PCI All " (TF, TAT, PAI-1, tPA) in PCI; transient effect seen centrally with atherectomy " in platelet expression (CD62P) in an unstable plaque Effects of interventions Different modalities such as balloon angioplasty, stent use, and atherectomy during percutaneous intervention can lead to differing patterns of platelets activation, coagulation, and fibrinolysis.66 For instance, plasma levels of tissue factor, thrombin–antithrombin III complex, plasminogen activator inhibitor, and tissue plasminogen activator are elevated up to 24 h after all coronary procedures, whereas only mechanical atherectomy seems to induce significant (though transient) platelet activation seen in CS samples. There is a potential link to in-stent restenosis,67 whereas abnormal intracoronary fibrinolytic cascade may also affect adverse modelling and restenosis.68 Plaque burden and coronary sinus sampling Imaging techniques, such as vascular ultrasonography, electronbeam-computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging, have made differing contributions to the estimation of plaque burden and characterization.69 The relationship of CS measures to each of these imaging methods will vary, dependent on their ability to define the extent of disease burden and/or its relative biological stability. CS catheterization complements these with the added benefit of quantifying the degree of local activation at vulnerable atherosclerotic plaques in the coronary beds. In unstable angina, activation of neutrophils and platelets was accurately assessed in the coronary circulation and compared with stable CAD.70 Furthermore, white cell expression of the CD11b/CD18 adhesion receptor in the CS,71 as indices of granulocyte and monocyte activation, further reflects enhanced inflammation in unstable atherosclerotic plaques. In acute myocardial infarction, differing platelet reactivity and aggregability with subsequent effect of prostacyclin inhibitors therapy within the coronary artery are well documented.72 Renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system Angiotensin II is an important mediator of interleukin (IL)-6 expression by vascular smooth muscle cells and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 and MCP-1 expression by endothelial cells in vitro.73 In keeping with the many clinical trials of renin–angiotensin blockade in preventing cardiovascular events, a possible direct effect on the myocardium has been postulated given that CS assays show a local cardiac production of angiotensin.74 By further analysing CS gradient of angiotensin II and its messenger RNA, there is an enhanced production in acute coronary syndrome, which is associated with the upregulation of intracardiac cytokines, such as tumour necrotic factor (TNF-a), IL-6, and interferon-gamma.75 This is in contrast to the lack of a significant change in the activity of peripheral levels of RAAS measured in the same cohort. C-reactive protein and inflammation Produced in the liver, C-reactive protein when defined using high-sensitivity analysis is now recognized to have a potentially direct pro-inflammatory role in acute coronary syndromes.76 The mechanistic links are numerous, but C-reactive protein is intimately linked to IL-1b, IL-6, and TNF-a, as well as the expression of intercellular and vascular Downloaded from by guest on November 20, 2014 ", increased level; #, decreased level; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; PMP, platelet microparticle; ISR, in-stent restenosis;PDGF, platelet-derived growth factor; BTG, beta-thromboglobulin; AMI, acute myocardial infarction; CS, coronary sinus; CSA, chronic stable angina; UA, unstable angina; Fib A, fibrinopeptide A; PAI-1, plasminogen activator inhibitor; tPA, tissue plasminogen activator; TF, tissue factor; TAT complex, thrombin–anti-thrombin complex; PF, prothrombin fragment. Coronary sinus sampling and pathophysiology Endothelial (dys)function Endothelial dysfunction is integral to the development of atherosclerosis85 and correlates with serum C-reactive protein in peripheral blood.86 Novel molecules could potentially offer avenues to improve our recognition of any early change within the coronary anatomy at a stage before angiographically visible plaque. For example, using immunologically defined circulating endothelial cells (CECs) shed from affected vascular beds may be a novel technique for the assessment of the extent or degree of endothelial injury. We have recently shown that CEC levels in the peripheral blood 48 h following acute coronary syndromes predict major adverse clinical events at 1 and 12 months.87 The marked difference in CEC count may be associated with a greater degree of vascular injury, and CEC release could potentiate pro-thrombotic mediators and platelet aggregation. Whether this marker is able to define a discrete coronary endothelial response or a more generalized response of the arterial (and/or venous) circulation is as yet unclear. During angiography or angioplasty, CECs may also provide information as to the extent of intramyocytic release, though no such data are available. Studies of regional response(s) in peripheral and CS blood would be valuable to explore this further. Myocardial ischaemia and the development of pre-conditioning Intermittent periods of reversible ischaemia allow the development of metabolic resistance to subsequent ischaemic stress and have the potential to reduce myocardial loss at subsequent vessel occlusion. In animal models, a technique of intermittent pharmacological retrograde perfusion of the CS during surgical ischaemia can allow reduction of tissue hypoxia, impaired wall motion score, and histological necrotic area.88 In stable coronary patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), the lactate extraction ratio determined by simultaneous blood sampling from the aorta and the CS reveals that repeated balloon inflation can—in the short term, at least—enhance ischaemic preconditioning without collateral recruitment.89 Various strategies aiming at minimizing myocardial injury peri-CABG has been evaluated using similar surrogates defined in indices measured in the CS blood.90 Coronary retroperfusion, a technique involving CS cannulation, subsequent balloon occlusion, and retrograde venous injection, has also been used in an attempt to enhance ischaemic preconditioning and reduce complications particularly in those undergoing PCI. Berland et al.91 successfully catheterized the CS (average time , 3 min), with subsequent placement of an auto-inflatable balloon catheter in the great cardiac vein. The protocol involved synchronized retrograde perfusion using this catheter at the time of intracoronary balloon inflation during the PCI procedure. Of the 12 patients studied, fewer episodes of chest pain were reported during the 101 (+ 36) s of balloon occlusion, and quantitatively, electrographic ST was reduced (10.4 + 7.8 mm compared with 18.8 + 10.6 mm in controls; P , 0.01). Further studies are therefore needed to fully evaluate the clinical impact and potential optimal use of procedural variables such as duration and frequency of balloon inflation or stent type and deployment in ischaemic preconditioning during PCI. Downloaded from by guest on November 20, 2014 adhesion molecule-1 and the induction of MCP-1 in endothelial cells—all these changes potentially destabilize plaque structure. From peripheral blood samples, systemically elevated C-reactive protein levels are associated with an increased risk of subsequent myocardial infarction, admission with unstable chest pain symptoms, and recurrent ischaemic events.77 In an angiographic study of patients with acute coronary syndrome, a close correlation exists between peripheral serum C-reactive protein levels, target lesion complexity,78 and angioplasty outcome.79 Assays of C-reactive protein from the CS have been used to compare the level within the coronary tree and systemically in differing clinical conditions. Techniques to harvest blood using distal protection coronary devices have further helped to elucidate the role of C-reactive protein during the mechanical treatment of active coronary plaque disease. Indeed, CS levels of C-reactive protein have been found to be significantly higher in patients with chronic CAD and in patients with unstable angina,80 but interestingly, not in those with an acute myocardial infarction. This is despite elevated markers such as IL-1b, IL-8, and TNF-a found following coronary culprit lesion in the setting of acute myocardial infarction.81 The precise reason as to why CS levels of C-reactive protein are not elevated in occlusive coronary disease is unclear. One possible explanation of this paradox is that many cytokines, such as TNF-a and IL-6, are produced in situ as a result of myocardial necrosis and, hence, are an ‘after effect’ of the acute infarction process. In unstable angina, a low-grade chronic inflammatory process exists, as suggested by high-C-reactive protein levels that precede cardiac troponin release and the ensuing activation of cytokines. Further in-depth understanding of the role of various inflammatory cytokines has been gained by combining CS site with intracoronary sampling. A recent study of 41 patients with acute myocardial infarction also confirmed similar findings from the site of plaque rupture and suggested the origin (and role) of C-reactive protein as a systemic acute phase reactant.82 No increase or ‘consumption’ of C-reactive protein was seen before and after lesion in these patients, whereas changes in IL-6 and TNF-a levels correlated well with the extent of myocyte necrosis, as measured by the level of troponin rise. CS catheterization has also been utilized to evaluate the extent of the inflammatory response within the coronary circulation during unstable symptoms. For example, Buffon et al.83 found that the local response in acute coronary syndromes was not restricted to the unstable plaque but was present throughout the coronary vasculature. Levels of neutrophil myeloperoxidase activity (with enzymatic depletion mirroring enhanced inflammatory processes) were assayed from aortic blood and segmental branches of the coronary venous system, and activity was lowered in CS blood draining the site of coronary culprit lesion as well as non-affected areas.84 Of course, these findings are dependent upon the response moment and circulatory half life of the biomarkers concerned, as well as being confounded by re-circulation. 935 936 Coronary sinus sampling during coronary interventional procedures and outcomes limited contemporary data with regard to PCI involving DES, glycoprotein IIb IIIa inhibitors, or combination platelet inhibition with clopidogrel and aspirin. Responses to vascular growth therapies in CAD Manipulating the growth factors regulating angiogenesis has been widely studied as potential treatment to enhance coronary perfusion,106 particularly in patients not suitable for conventional revascularization. Given the potential therapeutic application of vascular growth factors in coronary heart disease,107 animal models have been mostly used to demonstrate the efficacy of percutaneous intramyocardial delivery using CS.108 In one animal model,109 for example, venous injection of radiographic contrast following balloon occlusion of the CS led to infiltration of targeted myocardial regions. This radiographic effect persisted for at least 30 min. Delivery of autologous bone marrow can be done effectively in an animal model via the CS and transient occlusion, resulting in improved angiogenesis in areas with myocardial injury.110 Thus, the feasibility of percutaneous selective coronary venous cannulation and injection provides the potential as a novel approach for local myocardial drug delivery. This aspect can be extended to include intracardiac monitoring and possibly, tailoring of treatment. For example, in Fabry’s disease (an X-linked inborn metabolic disorder caused by deficient activity of a-galactosidase A111), assays of enzymatic delivery and customization of intravascular levels have been successfully performed using samples from the CS.112 One case report also used the coronary venous system to ‘retrogradely’ perfuse ischaemic myocardium.113 In this patient—who had diffuse CAD, not amenable to conventional revascularization—a percutaneous fistula was created between the left anterior descending artery and the interventricular branch of the coronary circulation with proximal occlusion of the vein. This fistula was still patent at 12 months, with subjective improvement in symptoms. The impact of systemic drugs on the coronary circulation and, in particular, on PCI has been evaluated using CS sampling. In a small number (n ¼ 9) of patients undergoing PCI,114 nifedipine CR has been shown to reduce the intracardiac C-reactive protein level and vasospasm periprocedurally. Limitations of coronary sinus catheterization A large body of literature is broadly supportive of CS sampling as a better means of defining both acute and chronic cardiac responses to ischaemia and atheroma (Figure 5). The invasive nature of CS cannulation carries a small risk from the additional venous access site, transient supraventricular arrhythmias, and failure to achieve a stable catheter position with adequate exclusion of atrial blood. Furthermore, activation of platelet and thrombin production remains a potential drawback for CS cannulation and manipulation, although this effect is attenuated using heparin-bonded catheters.115 Though well recognized in right-heart catheterization cases from the 1980s,116 CS thrombosis is poorly documented with contemporary techniques and catheters. A recent review of over 10 000 CS cannulations for the induction of retrograde cardioplegia Downloaded from by guest on November 20, 2014 PCI including stent placement remains the commonest method of revascularization for CHD, in both the USA84 and the UK.92 By reducing the incidence of acute vessel closure, recoil, and maintaining luminal patency, stent deployment is now the preferred method when compared with plain balloon angioplasty in PCI.93 However, the rate of angiographic in-stent restenosis remains high, at up to 40% with bare metal stent94 and 25% with drug-eluting stent (DES) in complex PCI.95 Furthermore, complications such as subacute thrombosis can develop in both bare metal-96–98 and DES-treated patients.99 CS sampling has been used infrequently to address potential markers of in-stent stenoses which may be distinct from endogenous atheroma. In a study of plasma levels of inflammatory cytokines, as well as cytokine-generation capacities of monocytes, before PCI and after 3–6 months follow-up period in 34 consecutive patients, inflammatory indices were significantly decreased in patients without restenosis compared with those with restenosis.100 CS levels of IL-6 are increased after PCI, and higher levels in response to PCI have been associated with late restenosis.101 In Indo-Asians undergoing PCI, platelet function or activity with varying concentrations of adenosine di-phosphate was assessed using a platelet aggregometer.102 In the patients who developed restenosis, significantly higher basal platelet aggregability was found, though no significant difference or trend was noted over time in the small number (n ¼ 7) investigated. Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1, an index of fibrinolysis) activity changes immediately after PCI without stent implantation may also be indicative of clinical restenosis. Indeed, plasma levels of PAI-1 activity and fibrin D-dimer (a fibrin degradation product) were evaluated in two groups of patients who underwent either elective balloon PTCA alone or with stent implantation.103 Following PTCA, PAI-1 activity was higher in patients with subsequent clinical recurrence with restenosis (P , 0.005 in both groups) than in those without, whereas no differences were found in fibrin D-dimer levels. The role of neutrophil adhesion molecules104 (using CD11a, b, c and CD18 epitopes) in patients undergoing PCI has also been studied in the process of restenosis. The percent change in the expression of CD18 at 48 h after PTCA (from baseline) and that of CD11b were significantly correlated (r ¼ 0.73, P ¼ 0.0008) in patients with restenosis. Similarly, activation of neutrophil adhesion molecule Mac-1 at 48 h after PTCA may have value as a predictor of subsequent restenosis. CS levels of thrombin activity can be used to assess the localized effectiveness of a given dose of heparin during PCI. In one study,105 plasma levels of fibrinopeptide A (marker of thrombin activity) were elevated from the coronary and aortic root in patients with angiographic evidence of thrombus. This seems to indicate that heparin-resistant thrombin activity is associated with angiographic evidence of intracoronary thrombus and potentially, with ischaemic complications of PCI. Although the majority of studies have shown the importance of intracoronary assays and linkage to the processes of vessel or stent restenosis or thrombosis, there are R. Jaumdally et al. Coronary sinus sampling and pathophysiology Figure 5 937 Coronary sinus assay of blood biomarkers—the pros and cons. Conclusions Even under stable clinical conditions, atherosclerosis remains a dynamic process. Coronary circulatory measures via the CS can be used to provide an insight into the intricate pathophysiological processes underlying myocardial ischaemia. This invasive approach has helped in our understanding of these factors at intracardiac level and hence, potentially guides therapy during unstable plaque disease. Indeed, the use of CS blood sampling can provide investigators a method to assess the local changes in the myocardium, including ‘downstream’ changes following local therapeutic interventions, such as stem cell and drug administration. Furthermore, the potential ability to study the change along the different coronary circulation at different branches of CS is a possibility. Access via the venous circulation of the heart has also been used for the administration of drugs locally. Nonetheless, the invasive nature of this technique has limited its use in small study populations, and serial measurements over time are impractical. In conclusion, CS sampling offers a unique way of assessing the cardiac milieu and may prove useful in the monitoring of both local and systemic drugs and technologies. In future, larger studies will be needed to correlate CS sampling of various biomarkers with clinical outcomes. Conflict of interest: none declared. References 1. British Heart Foundation Fact; 2000. http://file04/www.bhf.org.uk/ professionals/uploaded/apr00.pdf. 2. Murray CJ, Lopez AD. Global mortality, disability, and the contribution of risk factors: Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet 1997;349: 1436–1442. 3. De Backer G, Ambrosioni E, Borch-Johnsen K, Brotons C, Cifkova R, Dallongeville J, Ebrahim S, Faergeman O, Graham I, Mancia G, Cats VM, Orth-Gomer K, Perk J, Pyorala K, Rodicio JL, Sans S, Sansoy V, Sechtem U, Silber S, Thomsen T, Wood D. European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice. Third Joint Task Force of European and other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice. Atherosclerosis 2004;173:381–391. 4. Liu JL, Maniadakis N, Gray A, Rayner M. The economic burden of coronary heart disease in the UK. Heart 2002;88:597–603. 5. Anderson KM, Odell PM, Wilson PWF, Kannel PW. Cardiovascular disease risk profiles. Am Heart J 1991;121:293–298. 6. Crittenden MD. Intraoperative metabolic monitoring of the heart: I. Clinical assessment of coronary sinus metabolites. Ann Thorac Surg 2001;72:S2220–S2226. 7. Knight BP, Gersh BJ, Carlson MD, Friedman PA, McNamara RL, Strickberger SA, Tse HF, Waldo AL; American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology (Subcommittee on Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias); Quality of Care and Outcomes Research Interdisciplinary Working Group; Heart Rhythm Society; AHA Writing Group. Role of permanent pacing to prevent atrial fibrillation: science advisory from the American Heart Association C. Circulation 2005;111:240–243. 8. Baim DS, Rothman MT, Harrison DC. Improved catheter for regional coronary sinus flow and metabolic studies. Am J Cardiol 1980;46:997–1000. 9. Winters KJ, Lasala JM, Eisenberg PR, Smith SC, Sewall DJ, Shelton ME. Modified heparin-bonded catheter for cannulation of the coronary sinus from the femoral vein. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1996;39:433–437. 10. Ueno T, Kai H, Ikeda H, Matsumoto T, Murohara T, Haramaki N, Eguchi H, Kato A, Takajo Y, Onitsuka I, Imaizumi T. Coronary sinus long sheath catheter system: a new device for transfemoral coronary sinus catheterization. Heart Vessels 1999;14:201–204. 11. Vaseghi M, Cesario D, Ji S, Shannon KM, Wiener I, Boyle NG, Fonarow GC, ´ bano M, Shivkumar K. Visualization using LCA injection. Pacing ValderrA Clin Electrophysiol 2005;28:185–190. 12. Lantos J, Temes G, Gobolos L, Jaberansari MT, Roth E. Is peripheral blood a reliable indicator of acute oxidative stress following heart ischemia and reperfusion? Med Sci Monit 2001;7:1166–1170. 13. Crea F, Lanza GA. Angina pectoris and normal coronary arteries: cardiac syndrome X. Heart 2004;90:457–463. 14. Cannon RO, Epstein SE. ‘Microvascular angina’ as a cause of chest pain with angiographically normal coronary arteries. Am J Cardiol 1988;61: 1338–1343. 15. Buchthal SD, den Hollander JA, Merz CNB, Merz CN, Rogers WJ, Pepine CJ, Reichek N, Sharaf BL, Reis S, Kelsey SF, Pohost GM. Abnormal myocardial phosphorus-31 nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy in women with chest pain but normal coronary angiograms. N Engl J Med 2000;342:829–835. 16. Galassi AR, Crea F, Araujo LI, Lammertsma AA, Pupita G, Yamamoto Y, Rechavia E, Jones T, Kaski JC, Maseri A. Comparison of myocardial blood flow in syndrome X and one-vessel coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 1993;72:134–142. 17. Buffon A, Rigattieri S, Santini SA, Ramazzotti V, Crea F, Giardina B, Maseri A. Myocardial ischemia-reperfusion damage after pacing-induced tachycardia in patients with cardiac syndrome X. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2000;279:H2627–H2633. Downloaded from by guest on November 20, 2014 during cardiac surgery shows an incidence of ,0.1% of complications.117 In PCI, concomittant use of contrast media can influence coagulation and platelets but limited data exist concerning the effect of newer low-osmolarity contrast media on coronary blood profiles.118 These issues, together with limited technological support and intrusive longitudinal studies, understandably limit the enrolment of patients into CS studies. Emerging evidence seems to suggest that plasma levels from coronary artery ostium can be used. This may prove quite attractive in quantifying the ‘local’ environment, as it can be included in the left-heart catheterization procedure without the need for additional right-sided instrumentation. Thus, when evaluating the expression of P-selectin by platelets in response to adenosine diphosphate,119 no difference was seen in blood samples from the culprit coronary arterial ostial blood and the CS. However, these findings need to be reproduced consistently with different assays. What is needed is rigorous evaluation and comparative studies using multiple sites including CS. 938 40. El-Gendi H, Violaris AG, Foale R, Sharma HS, Sheridan DJ. Endogenous, local, vascular endothelial growth factor production in patients with chronic total coronary artery occlusions: further evidence for its role in angiogenesis. Heart 2002;87:158–159. 41. Lambiase PD, Edwards RJ, Anthopoulos P, Rahman S, Meng YG, Bucknall CA, Redwood SR, Pearson JD, Marber MS. Circulating humoral factors and endothelial progenitor cells in patients with differing coronary collateral support. Circulation 2004;109:2986–2992. 42. Ito BR, Roth DM, Chenoweth DE, Lefer AM, Engler RL. Thromboxane is produced in response to intracoronary infusions of complement C5a in pigs. Cyclooxygenase blockade does not reduce the myocardial ischemia and leukocyte accumulation. Circ Res 1989;65:1220–1232. 43. Soeki T, Tamura Y, Shinohara H, Sakabe K, Onose Y, Fukuda N. Serum hepatocyte growth factor predicts ventricular remodeling following myocardial infarction. Circ J 2002;66:1003–1007. 44. Fuster V, Badimon JJ. Clinical therapeutic approaches. Vasc Med 1998;3: 231–239. 45. Loscalzo J. The relation between atherosclerosis and thrombosis. Circulation 1992;86:95–99. 46. Cella G, Zahavi J, DeHaas HA, Kakkar VV. Beta thromboglobulin, platelet production time and platelet function in vascular disease. Br J Haematol 1979;43:127–136. 47. Lam JY, Latour JG, Lesperance J, Water D. Platelet aggregation, coronary artery disease progression and future coronary events. Am J Cardiol 1994;73:333–338. 48. Rasi V, Torstila I, Ikkata E. Beta thromboglobulin in acute myocardial. Acta Med Scand 1980;642:85–91. 49. Marcella JJ, Nichols AB, Johnson LL, Owen J, Reison DS, Kaplan KL, Cannon PJ. Exercise-induced myocardial ischemia in patients with coronary artery disease: lack of evidence for platelet activation or fibrin formation in peripheral venous blood. J Am Coll Cardiol 1983;1: 1185–1193. 50. Martin JL, Fisher CA, Untereker WJ, Laskey WK, Hirshfeld JW Jr, Harken AH, Addonizio VP. Effect of high dose aspirin on coronary hemodynamics during pacing-induced myocardial ischemia. J Am Coll Cardiol 1985;5:210–215. 51. Berger HJ, Zaret BL, Speroff L, Cohen LS, Wolfson S. Cardiac prostaglandin release during myocardial ischemia induced by atrial pacing in patients with coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 1977;39:481–486. 52. Montalescot G, Drobinski G, Maclouf J, Maillet F, Salloum J, Ankri A, Kazatchkine M, Eugene L, Thomas D, Grosgogeat Y. Evaluation of thromboxane production and complement activation during myocardial ischemia in patients with angina pectoris. Circulation 1991;84:2054–2062. 53. Montalescot G, Maclouf J, Drobinski G, Mencia-Huerta JM, Ankri A, Grosgogeat Y, Thomas D. Lack of platelet-activating factor release during reversible myocardial ischaemia. Eur Heart J 1992;13: 1641–1644. 54. Montalescot G, Maclouf J, Drobinski G, Salloum J, Grosgogeat Y, Thomas D. Eicosanoid biosynthesis in patients with stable angina: beneficial effects of very low dose aspirin. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994;24: 33–38. 55. Newby DE, McLeod AL, Uren NG, Flint L, Ludlam CA, Webb DJ, Fox KA, Boon NA. Impaired coronary tissue plasminogen activator release is associated with coronary atherosclerosis and cigarette smoking: direct link between endothelial dysfunction and atherothrombosis. Circulation 2001;103:1936–1941. 56. Ouchi N, Kihara S, Arita Y, Maeda K, Kuriyama H, Okamoto Y, Hotta K, Nishida M, Takahashi M, Nakamura T, Yamashita S, Funahashi T. Novel modulator for endothelial adhesion molecules: adipocyte-derived plasma protein adiponectin. Circulation 1999;100:2473–2476. 57. Okamoto Y, Kihara S, Ouchi N, Nishida M, Arita Y, Kumada M, Ohashi K, Sakai N, Shimomura I, Kobayashi H, Terasaka N, Inaba T, Funahashi T. Adiponectin reduces atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice. Circulation 2002;106:2767–2770. 58. Hotta K, Funahashi T, Arita Y, Takahashi M, Matsuda M, Okamoto Y, Iwahashi H, Kuriyama H, Ouchi N, Maeda K, Nishida M, Kihara S, Sakai N, Nakajima T, Hasegawa K, Muraguchi M, Ohmoto Y, Nakamura T, Yamashita S, Hanafusa T, Matsuzawa Y. Plasma concentrations of a novel, adipose-specific protein, adiponectin, in type 2 diabetic patients. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2000;20:1595–1599. 59. Furuhashi M, Ura N, Moniwa N, Shinshi Y, Kouzu H, Nishihara M, Kokubu N, Takahashi T, Sakamoto K, Hayashi M, Satoh N, Nishitani T, Shikano Y, Shimamoto K. Possible impairment of transcardiac utilization of adiponectin in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2004;27: 2217–2221. Downloaded from by guest on November 20, 2014 18. Lanza GA, Lu ¨scher TF, Pasceri V, Shaw SG, Buffon A, Montenero AS, Crea F, Maseri A. Effects of atrial pacing on arterial and coronary sinus endothelin-1 levels in syndrome X. Am J Cardiol 1999;84: 1187–1191. 19. Oshima S, Yasue H, Ogawa H, Okumura K, Matsuyama K. Fibrinopeptide A is released into the coronary circulation after coronary spasm. Circulation 1990;82:2222–2225. 20. Kaikita K, Ogawa H, Yasue H, Sakamoto T, Suefuji H, Sumida H, Okumura K. Soluble P-selectin is released into the coronary circulation after coronary spasm. Circulation 1995;92:1726–1730. 21. Egashira K, Inou T, Hirooka Y, Yamada A, Urabe Y, Takeshita A. Evidence of impaired endothelium-dependent coronary vasodilation in patients with angina pectoris and normal coronary angiograms. N Engl J Med 1993;328:659–1664. 22. Greenberg MA, Grose RM, Neuburger N, Silverman R, Strain JE, Cohen MV. Impaired coronary vasodilator responsiveness as a cause of lactate production during pacing-induced ischemia in patients with angina pectoris and normal coronary arteries. J Am Coll Cardiol 1987; 9:743–751. 23. Camici PG, Marraccini P, Lorenzoni R, Buzzigoli G, Pecori N, Perissinotto A, Ferrannini E, L’Abbate A, Marzilli M. Coronary hemodynamics and myocardial metabolism in patients with syndrome X: response to pacing stress. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991;17:1461–1470. 24. Goldberg S, Lam W, Mudge G, Green LH, Kushner F, Hirshfeld JW, Kastor JA. Coronary hemodynamic and myocardial metabolic alterations accompanying coronary spasm. Am J Cardiol 1979;43:481–487. 25. Mohri M, Ichiki T, Hirooka Y, Takeshita A. Endogenous nitric oxide prevents myocardial ischemia in patients with hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy. Am Heart J 2002;143:684–689. 26. Fuster V, Badimon JJ, Chesebro JH. Atherothrombosis: mechanisms and clinical therapeutic approaches. Vasc Med 1998;3:231–239. 27. Moncada S, Higgs A. The L-arginine-nitric oxide pathway. N Engl J Med 1993;329:2002–2012. 28. Drexler H. Factors involved in the maintenance of endothelial function. Am J Cardiol 1998;82:3S–4S. 29. Kinlay S, Behrendt D, Wainstein M, Beltrame J, Fang JC, Creager MA, Selwyn AP, Ganz P. The role of endothelin-1 in the constriction of human atherosclerotic coronary arteries. Circulation 2001;104: 1114–1118. 30. Rubbo H, Trostchansky A, Botti H, Batthyany C. Interactions of nitric oxide and peroxynitrite with low-density lipoprotein. Biol Chem 2002; 383:547–552. 31. Pernow J, Kaijser L, Lundberg JM, Ahlborg G. Comparable potent coronary constrictor effects of endothelin-1 and big endothelin-1 in humans. Circulation 1996;94:2077–2082. 32. Lerman A, Holmes DR Jr, Bell MR, Garratt KN, Nishimura RA, Burnett JC Jr. Endothelin in coronary endothelial dysfunction and early atherosclerosis in humans. Circulation 1995;92:2426–2431. 33. Ludman PF, Maseri A, Clark P, Davies GJ. Effects of calcitonin gene-related peptide on normal and atheromatous vessels and on resistance vessels in the coronary circulation in humans. Circulation 1991;84: 1993–2000. 34. Mezaki T, Matsubara T, Hori T, Higuchi K, Nakamura A, Nakagawa I, Imai S, Ozaki K, Tsuchida K, Nasuno A, Tanaka T, Kubota K, Nakano M, Miida T, Aizawa Y. Plasma levels of soluble thrombomodulin, C-reactive protein, and serum amyloid A protein in the atherosclerotic coronary circulation. Jpn Heart J 2003;44:601–612. 35. Matsubara T, Ishibashi T, Hori T, Ozaki K, Mezaki T, Tsuchida K, Nasuno A, Kubota K, Tanaka T, Miida T, Aizawa Y, Nishio M. Association between coronary endothelial dysfunction and local inflammation of atherosclerotic coronary arteries. Mol Cell Biochem 2003;249:67–73. 36. Kruger D, Sheikhzadeh A, Giannitsis E, Stierle U. Cardiac release and kinetics of endothelin after severe short-lasting myocardial ischemia. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;30:942–946. 37. Carmeliet P. Mechanisms of angiogenesis and arteriogenesis. Nat Med 2000;6:389–395. 38. Inoue M, Itoh H, Ueda M, Naruko T, Kojima A, Komatsu R, Doi K, Ogawa Y, Tamura N, Takaya K, Igaki T, Yamashita J, Chun TH, Masatsugu K, Becker AE, Nakao K. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression in human coronary atherosclerotic lesions: possible pathophysiological significance of VEGF in progression of atherosclerosis. Circulation 1998;98:2108–2116. 39. Lim HS, Blann AD, Chong AY, Freestone B, Lip GY. Plasma vascular endothelial growth factor, angiopoietin-1, and angiopoietin-2 in diabetes: implications for cardiovascular risk and effects of multifactorial intervention. Diabetes Care 2004;27:2918–2924. R. Jaumdally et al. Coronary sinus sampling and pathophysiology 82. Maier W, Altwegg LA, Corti R, Gay S, Hersberger M, Maly FE, Sutsch G, Roffi M, Neidhart M, Eberli FR, Tanner FC, Gobbi S, von Eckardstein A, Luscher TF. Inflammatory markers at the site of ruptured plaque in acute myocardial infarction: locally increased interleukin-6 and serum amyloid a but decreased C-reactive protein. Circulation 2005;111: 1355–1361. 83. Buffon A, Biasucci LM, Liuzzo G, D’Onofrio G, Crea F, Maseri A. Widespread coronary inflammation in unstable angina. N Engl J Med 2002; 347:5–12. 84. AHA. http://www.americanheart.org (accessed 21/6/05). 85. Luscher TF, Barton M. Biology of the endothelium. Clin Cardiol 1997;20: II3–II10. 86. Fichtlscherer S, Rosenberger G, Walter DH, Breuer S, Dimmeler S, Zeiher AM. Elevated C-reactive protein levels and impaired endothelial vasoreactivity in patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation 2000;102:1000–1006. 87. Lee KW, Lip GY, Tayebjee M, Foster W, Blann AD. Circulating endothelial cells, von Willebrand factor, interleukin-6, and prognosis in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Blood 2005;105:526–532. 88. Lazar HL, Haan CK, Yang X, Rivers S, Bernard S, Shemin RJ. Reduction of infarct size with coronary venous retroperfusion. Circulation 1992;86: 352–357. 89. Sakai K, Yamagata T, Teragawa H, Matsuura H, Chayama K. Preconditioning effect during coronary angioplasty in patients with stable angina pectoris. Intern Med 2002;41:509–515. 90. Rastan AJ, Bittner HB, Gummert JF, Walther T, Schewick CV, Girdauskas E, Mohr FW. On-pump beating heart versus off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery—evidence of pump-induced myocardial injury. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2005;27:1057–1064. 91. Berland J, Farcot JC, Barrier A, Dellac A, Gamra H, Letac B. Coronary venous synchronized retroperfusion during percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of left anterior descending coronary artery. Circulation 1990;81:35–42. 92. British Cardiovascular Intervention Society (BCIS) Database, Audit. 2001; http://www.bcis.orgbcis.org (accessed 21/6/05). 93. Betriu A, Masotti M, Serra A, Alonso J, Fernandez-Aviles F, Gimeno F, Colman T, Zueco J, Delcan JL, Garcia E, Calabuig J. Randomized comparison of coronary stent implantation and balloon angioplasty in the treatment of de novo coronary artery lesions (START): a four-year follow-up. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;34:1498–1506. 94. Serruys PW, de Jaegere P, Kiemeneij F, Macaya C, Rutsch W, Heyndrickx G, Emanuelsson H, Marco J, Legrand V, Materne P. A comparison of balloon expandable-stent implantation with balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease: Benestent Study Group. N Engl J Med 1994;331:489–495. 95. Colombo A, Moses JW, Morice MC, Ludwig J, Holmes DR Jr, Spanos V, Louvard Y, Desmedt B, Di Mario C, Leon MB. Randomized study to evaluate sirolimus-eluting stents implanted at coronary bifurcation lesions. Circulation 2004;109:1244–1249. 96. Roubin GS, Cannon AD, Agrawal SK, Macander PJ, Dean LS, Baxley WA, Breland J. Intracoronary stenting for acute and threatened closure complicating percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Circulation 1992;85:916–927. 97. Fischman DL, Leon MB, Baim DS, Schatz RA, Savage MP, Penn I, Detre K, Veltri L, Ricci D, Nobuyoshi M. A randomized comparison of coronary-stent placement and balloon angioplasty in the treatment of coronary artery disease: Stent Restenosis Study Investigators. N Engl J Med 1994;331:496–501. 98. Hearn JA, King SB III, Douglas JSJ, Carlin SF, Lembo NJ, Ghazzal ZM. Clinical and angiographic outcomes after coronary artery stenting for acute or threatened closure after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: initial results with a balloon-expandable, stainless steel design. Circulation 1993;88:2086–2096. 99. US Food and Drug Administration. FDA Public health web notification: information for physicians on subacuet thrombosis (SAT) and hypersensitivity reaction with the use of the Cordis CYPHER corobary stent; 2003. http://www.fda.gov\cdph\safety\cypher.html. 100. Tashiro H, Shimokawa H, Sadamatsu K, Aoki T, Yamamoto K. Role of cytokines in the pathogenesis of restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Coron Artery Dis 2001;12:107–113. 101. Ikeda U, Ito T, Shimada K. Interleukin-6 acute coronary syndrome. Clin Cardiol 2001;24:701–704. 102. Goel PK, Shahi M, Agarwal AK, Srivastava S, Seth PK. Platelet aggregability and occurrence of restenosis following coronary angioplasty. Int J Cardiol 1997;60:227–231. Downloaded from by guest on November 20, 2014 60. Saino A, Pomidossi G, Perondi R, Morganti A, Turolo L, Mancia G. Modulation of sympathetic coronary vasoconstriction by cardiac renin–angiotensin system in human coronary heart disease. Circulation 2000;101:2277–2283. 61. Remme WJ, de Leeuw PW, Bootsma M, Look MP, Kruijssen DA. Systemic neurohumoral activation and vasoconstriction during pacing-induced acute myocardial ischemia in patients with stable angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol 1991;68:181–186. 62. Foult JM, Tavolaro O, Antony I, Nitenberg A. Coronary vasodilation induced by intracoronary enalaprilat: an argument for the role of a local renin–angiotensin system in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. Eur Heart J 1989;10:97–100. 63. Brunner-La Rocca HP, Esler MD, Jennings GL, Kaye DM. Effect of cardiac sympathetic nervous activity on mode of death in congestive heart failure. Eur Heart J 2001;22:1136–1143. 64. Libby P. Current concepts of the pathogenesis of the acute coronary syndromes. Circulation 2001;104:365–372. 65. Golino P, Ravera A, Ragni M, Cirillo P, Piro O, Chiariello M. Involvement of tissue factor pathway inhibitor in the coronary circulation of patients with acute coronary syndromes. Circulation 2003;108:2864–2869. 66. Mizuno O, Hojo Y, Ikeda U, Katsuki T, Fukazawa H, Kurosaki K, Fujikawa H, Shimada K. Assessment of coagulation and platelet activation in coronary sinus blood induced by transcatheter coronary intervention for narrowing of the left anterior descending coronary artery. Am J Cardiol 2000;85:154–160. 67. Mizuno O, Ikeda U, Hojo Y, Fujikawa H, Katsuki T, Shimada K. Tissue factor expression in coronary circulation as a prognostic factor for late restenosis after coronary angioplasty. Cardiology 2001;95:84–89. 68. Fornitz GG, Nielsen P, Amtorp O, Kassis E, Abildgard U, Sloth C, Winther K, Orskov H, Dalsgard J, Husted S. Impaired fibrinolysis determines the outcome of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). Eur J Clin Invest 2001;31:586–592. 69. Celermajer DS. Non invasive detection of atherosclerosis. N Engl J Med 1998; 339:2014–2015. 70. Patel PB, Pfau SE, Cleman MW, Brennan JJ, Howes C, Remetz M, Cabin HS, Setaro JF, Rinder HM. Comparison of coronary artery specific leukocyte-platelet conjugate formation in unstable versus stable angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol 2004;93:410–413. 71. Mazzone A, De Servi S, Ricevuti G, Mazzucchelli I, Fossati G, Pasotti D, Bramucci E, Angoli L, Marsico F, Specchia G. Increased expression of neutrophil and monocyte adhesion molecules in unstable coronary artery disease. Circulation 1993;88:358–363. 72. Mueller HS, Rao PS, Greenberg MA, Buttrick PM, Sussman II, Levite HA, Grose RM, Perez-Davila V, Strain JE, Spaet TH. Systemic and transcardiac platelet activity in acute myocardial infarction in man: resistance to prostacyclin. Circulation 1985;72:1336–1345. 73. Libby P, Ridker PM, Maseri A. Inflammation and atherosclerosis. Circulation 2002;105:1135–1143. 74. Neri Serneri GG, Boddi M, Coppo M, Chechi T, Zarone N, Moira M, Poggesi L, Margheri M, Simonetti I. Evidence for the existence of a functional cardiac renin–angiotensin system in humans. Circulation 1996; 94:1886–1893. 75. Neri Serneri GG, Boddi M, Modesti PA, Coppo M, Cecioni I, Toscano T, Papa ML, Bandinelli M, Lisi GF, Chiavarelli M. Cardiac angiotensin II participates in coronary microvessel inflammation of unstable angina and strengthens the immunomediated component. Circ Res 2004;94: 1630–1637. 76. Yeh ET, Anderson HV, Pasceri V, Willerson JT. C-reactive protein: linking inflammation to cardiovascular complications. Circulation 2001;104: 974–975. 77. Ridker PM. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein: potential adjunct for global risk assessment in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Circulation 2001;103:1813–1818. 78. Moukarbel GV, Arnaout MS, Alam SE. C-reactive protein is a marker for a complex culprit lesion anatomy in unstable angina. Clin Cardiol 2001; 24:506–510. 79. Chan AW, Bhatt DL, Chew DP, Reginelli J, Schneider JP, Topol EJ, Ellis SG. Relation of inflammation and benefit of statins after percutaneous coronary interventions. Circulation 2003;107:1750–1756. 80. Cusack MR, Marber MS, Lambiase PD, Bucknall CA, Redwood SR. Systemic inflammation in unstable angina is the result of myocardial necrosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;39:1917–1923. 81. Neumann FJ, Ott I, Gawaz M, Richardt G, Holzapfel H, Jochum M, Schomig A. Cardiac release of cytokines and inflammatory responses in acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 1995;92:748–755. 939 940 115. 116. 117. 118. 119. 120. 121. 122. 123. 124. 125. 126. 127. having percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol 2005;95: 1235–1237. Nichols AB, Owen J, Grossman BA, Marcella JJ, Fleisher LN, Lee MM. Effect of heparin bonding on catheter-induced fibrin formation and platelet activation. Circulation 1984;70:843–850. Guindi MM, Walley VM. Coronary sinus thrombosis: a potential complication of right heart catheterization. Can J Surg 1987;30:66–67. Economopoulos GC, Michalis A, Palatianos GM, Sarris GE. Management of catheter-related injuries to the coronary sinus. Ann Thorac Surg 2003; 76:112–116. Chronos NA, Goodall AH, Wilson DJ, Sigwart U, Buller NP. Profound platelet degranulation is an important side effect of some types of contrast media used in interventional cardiology. Circulation 1993; 88 2035–2044. Kabbani SS, Watkins MW, Holoch PA, Terrien EF, Sobel BE, Schneider DJ. Platelet reactivity in coronary ostial blood: a reflection of the thrombotic state accompanying plaque rupture and of the adequacy of anti-thrombotic therapy. J Thromb Thrombolysis 2001;12:171–176. Craft JA, Masci PP, Roberts MS, Brighton TA, Garrahy P, Cox S, Marsh NA. Increased platelet-derived microparticles in the coronary circulation of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty patients. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 2004;15:475–482. Rauch U, Wolff UM, Schultheiss HP, Schwimmbeck PL. Leukocyte CD15 expression and platelet activation in the coronary sinus after coronary intervention. Pathophysiol Haemost Thromb 2003;33:109–115. Johansen O, Brekke M, Seljeflot I, Semb AG, Arnesen H. Blood platelet count and reactivity are associated with restenosis 6 months after coronary angioplasty. Scand Cardiovasc J 2004;38:211–215. Watkins MW, Luetmer PA, Schneider DJ, Witmer WT, Vaitkus PT, Sobel BE. Determinants of rebound thrombin activity after cessation of heparin in patients undergoing coronary interventions. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1998;44:257–264. Fornitz GG, Nielsen P, Amtorp O, Kassis E, Abildgard U, Sloth C, Winther K, Orskov H, Dalsgard J, Husted S. Impaired fibrinolysis determines the outcome of percutaneus transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). Eur J Clin Invest 2001;31:586–592. Mizuno O, Ikeda U, Hojo Y, Fujikawa H, Katsuki T, Shimada K. Tissue factor expression in coronary circulation as a prognostic factor for late restenosis after coronary angioplasty. Cardiology 2001;95:84–89. Mizuno O, Hojo Y, Ikeda U, Katsuki T, Fukazawa H, Kurosaki K, Fujikawa H, Shimada K. Assessment of coagulation and platelet zactivation in coronary sinus blood induced by transcatheter coronary intervention for narrowing of the left anterior descending coronary artery. Am J Cardiol 2000;85:154–160. Patel PB, Pfau SE, Cleman MW, Brennan JJ, Howes C, Remetz M, Cabin HS, Setaro JF, Rinder HM. Comparison of coronary artery specific leukocyte-platelet conjugate formation in unstable versus stable angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol 2004;93:410–413. Downloaded from by guest on November 20, 2014 103. Prisco D, Fedi S, Antonucci E, Capanni M, Chiarugi L, Chioccioli M, Falai M, Giglioli C, Abbate R, Gensini GF. Postprocedural PAI-1 activity is a risk marker of subsequent clinical restenosis in patients both with and without stent implantation after elective balloon PTCA. Thromb Res 2001;104:181–186. 104. Inoue T, Sakai Y, Morooka S, Hayashi T, Takayanagi K, Takabatake Y. Expression of polymorphonuclear leukocyte adhesion molecules and its clinical significance in patients treated with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;28:1127–1133. 105. Oltrona L, Eisenberg PR, Lasala JM, Sewall DJ, Shelton ME, Winters KJ. Association of heparin-resistant thrombin activity with acute ischaemic complications of coronary interventions. Circulation 1996;94: 2064–2071. 106. Lee JS, Feldman AM. Gene therapy for therapeutic myocardial angiogenesis: a promising synthesis of two emerging technologies. Nat Med 1998;4:739–742. 107. Schumacher B, Pecher P, von Specht BU, Stegmann T. Induction of neoangiogenesis in ischaemic myocardium by human growth factors: first clinical results of a new treatment of coronary heart disease. Circulation 1998;97:645–650. 108. Rezaee M, Yeung AC, Altman P, Lubbe D, Takeshi S, Schwartz RS, Stertzer S, Altman JD. Evaluation of the percutaneous intramyocardial injection for local myocardial treatment. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2001;53:271–276. 109. Herity NA, Lo ST, Oei F, Lee DP, Ward MR, Filardo SD, Hassan A, Suzuki T, Rezaee M, Carter AJ, Yock PG, Yeung AC, Fitzgerald PJ. Selective regional myocardial infiltration by the percutaneous coronary venous route: a novel technique for local drug delivery. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2000;51:358–363. 110. Vicario J, Piva J, Pierini A, Ortega HH, Canal A, Gerardo L, Pfeiffer H, Campos C, Fendrich I, Novero R, Monti A. Transcoronary sinus delivery of autologous bone marrow and angiogenesis in pig models with myocardial injury. Cardiovasc Radiat Med 2002;3:91–94. 111. Eng CM, Germain DP, Banikazemi M, Warnock DG, Wanner C, Hopkin RJ, Bultas J, Lee P, Sims K, Brodie SE, Pastores GM, Strotmann JM, Wilcox WR. Fabry disease: guidelines for the evaluation and management of multi-organ system involvement. Genet Med 2006;8:539–548. 112. Frustaci A, Chimenti C, Ricci R, Natale L, Russo MA, Pieroni M, Eng CM, Desnick RJ. Improvement in cardiac function in the cardiac variant of Fabry’s disease with galactose-infusion therapy. N Engl J Med 2001; 345:25–32. 113. Oesterle SN, Reifart N, Hauptmann E, Hayase M, Yeung AC. Percutaneous in situ coronary venous arterialization: report of the first human catheter-based coronary artery bypass. Circulation 2001;103: 2539–2543. 114. Takase H, Toriyama T, Sugiyama M, Nakazawa A, Hayashi K, Goto T, Sugiura T, Ikeda K, Sato K, Ueda R, Dohi Y. Effect of nifedipine on Creactive protein levels in the coronary sinus and on coronary blood flow in response to acetylcholine in patients with stable angina pectoris R. Jaumdally et al.
© Copyright 2024