Differentiating PFAPA Syndrome From Monogenic Periodic Fevers Marco Gattorno, Roberta Caorsi, Antonella Meini, Marco Cattalini, Silvia Federici, Francesco Zulian, Elisabetta Cortis, Giuseppina Calcagno, Alberto Tommasini, Rita Consolini, Gabriele Simonini, Maria Antonietta Pelagatti, Maurizia Baldi, Isabella Ceccherini, Alessandro Plebani, Joost Frenkel, Maria Pia Sormani and Alberto Martini Pediatrics 2009;124;e721; originally published online September 28, 2009; DOI: 10.1542/peds.2009-0088 The online version of this article, along with updated information and services, is located on the World Wide Web at: http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/124/4/e721.full.html PEDIATRICS is the official journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics. A monthly publication, it has been published continuously since 1948. PEDIATRICS is owned, published, and trademarked by the American Academy of Pediatrics, 141 Northwest Point Boulevard, Elk Grove Village, Illinois, 60007. Copyright © 2009 by the American Academy of Pediatrics. All rights reserved. Print ISSN: 0031-4005. Online ISSN: 1098-4275. Downloaded from pediatrics.aappublications.org by guest on August 22, 2014 ARTICLES Differentiating PFAPA Syndrome From Monogenic Periodic Fevers AUTHORS: Marco Gattorno, MD,a,b Roberta Caorsi, MD,a,b Antonella Meini, MD,c Marco Cattalini, MD,c Silvia Federici, MD,a,b Francesco Zulian, MD,d Elisabetta Cortis, MD,e Giuseppina Calcagno, MD,f Alberto Tommasini, MD,g Rita Consolini, MD,h Gabriele Simonini, MD,i Maria Antonietta Pelagatti, MD,a,b Maurizia Baldi, PhD,j Isabella Ceccherini, PhD,k Alessandro Plebani, MD,c Joost Frenkel, MD,l Maria Pia Sormani, PhD,m and Alberto Martini, MDa,b aPediatric Unit II and kLaboratory of Molecular Genetics, Giannina Gaslini Institute, Genoa, Italy; bDepartment of Pediatrics and mBiostatistics Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy; cDepartment of Pediatrics, Pediatric Immunology and Rheumatology Unit, Spedali Civili and University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy; dDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Padua, Padua, Italy; eDepartment of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Pediatric Hospital of the Child Jesus, Rome, Italy; fDepartment of Medical and Surgical Pediatric Sciences, Section of Pediatric Rheumatology, Hospital Worker University Gaetano Martino, Messina, Italy; gDepartment of Pediatrics, Scientific Institute for Treatment and Research Burlo Garofolo, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy; hDepartment of Reproductive Medicine and Development, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy; iDepartment of Pediatrics, Rheumatology Unit, Anna Meyer Children’s Hospital and University of Florence, Florence, Italy; jDepartment of Human Genetics, Galliera Hospital, Genoa, Italy; and lDepartment of General Pediatrics, Wilhelmina Children’s Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands KEY WORDS periodic fever, aphthous stomatitis, pharyngitis, and cervical adenitis syndrome, classification, diagnostic score, molecular analysis ABBREVIATIONS PFAPA—periodic fever, aphthous stomatitis, pharyngitis, and cervical adenitis FMF—familial Mediterranean fever TNF—tumor necrosis factor TRAPS—tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated periodic syndrome MKD—mevalonate kinase deficiency www.pediatrics.org/cgi/doi/10.1542/peds.2009-0088 doi:10.1542/peds.2009-0088 Accepted for publication May 29, 2009 Address correspondence to Marco Gattorno, MD, UO Pediatria II, G. Gaslini Institute, Largo G. Gaslini 5, 16146, Genova, Italy. E-mail: [email protected] WHAT’S KNOWN ON THIS SUBJECT: Inherited periodic fevers should be differentiated from PFAPA syndrome. PFAPA syndrome criteria are not able to distinguish genetically positive patients from genetically negative patients. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: The Gaslini diagnostic score represents a useful tool to identify patients who meet PFAPA syndrome criteria and are at low risk of carrying relevant mutations of genes associated with periodic fevers. abstract OBJECTIVES: To analyze whether there were clinical differences between genetically positive and negative patients fulfilling periodic fever, aphthous stomatitis, pharyngitis, and cervical adenitis (PFAPA) syndrome criteria and to test the accuracy of the Gaslini diagnostic score for identifying patients with PFAPA syndrome with higher probabilities of carrying relevant mutations in genes associated with periodic fevers. METHODS: Complete clinical and genetic information was available for 393 children with periodic fever; 82 had positive genetic test results, 75 had incomplete genetic test results, and 236 had negative results for MVK, TNFRSF1A, and MEFV mutations. Current diagnostic criteria for PFAPA syndrome were applied. RESULTS: Of 393 children, 210 satisfied PFAPA syndrome criteria; 43 carried diagnostic mutations (mevalonate kinase deficiency: n ⫽ 33; tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated periodic syndrome: n ⫽ 3; familial Mediterranean fever: n ⫽ 7), 37 displayed low-penetrance mutations or incomplete genotypes, and 130 demonstrated negative genetic testing results. Genetically positive patients had higher frequencies of abdominal pain and diarrhea (P ⬍ .001), vomiting (P ⫽ .006), and cutaneous rash and arthralgia (P ⫽ .01). Genetically negative patients had a higher frequency of exudative pharyngitis (P ⫽ .010). Genetically undetermined patients showed the same pattern of symptom frequency as genetically negative patients. The Gaslini diagnostic score was able to identify 91% of genetically positive patients correctly, with a global accuracy of 66%. PEDIATRICS (ISSN Numbers: Print, 0031-4005; Online, 1098-4275). Copyright © 2009 by the American Academy of Pediatrics FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: The authors have indicated they have no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose. PEDIATRICS Volume 124, Number 4, October 2009 CONCLUSION: The Gaslini diagnostic score represents a useful tool to identify patients meeting PFAPA syndrome criteria and at low risk of carrying relevant mutations in genes associated with periodic fevers. Pediatrics 2009;124:e721–e728 Downloaded from pediatrics.aappublications.org by guest on August 22, 2014 e721 The periodic fever, aphthous stomatitis, pharyngitis, and cervical adenitis (PFAPA) syndrome is a clinical entity that was first described in 1987.1 The syndrome has its onset before 5 years of age and is characterized by regularly (often clockwork-like) recurrent episodes of high fever lasting 3 to 6 days.2,3 The diagnosis is established on the basis of clinical criteria that require the presence of a recurrent fever of early onset (⬍5 years) and ⱖ1 of the 3 associated symptoms (aphthosis, cervical adenitis, and pharyngitis), in the absence of upper respiratory tract infections and cyclic neutropenia.4 It is now widely recognized that, to make a diagnosis of PFAPA syndrome, it is necessary to rule out the presence of another group of diseases (monogenic periodic fevers) that are caused by mutations of genes involved in regulation of the inflammatory response, namely, familial Mediterranean fever (FMF), tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor-associated periodic syndrome (TRAPS), and mevalonate kinase deficiency (MKD). These disorders, which belong to the group of autoinflammatory diseases,5 also are responsible for recurrent fevers and demonstrate clinical overlap with PFAPA syndrome in childhood.6–9 In this respect, the current PFAPA syndrome diagnostic criteria have very low specificity. We showed recently that a relevant number of patients with monogenic periodic fevers also meet the diagnostic criteria for PFAPA syndrome.10 In that preliminary experience, 83% of patients with MKD, 57% of patients with TRAPS, and 8% of patients with FMF satisfied the criteria for PFAPA syndrome,10 which shows that the criteria have limited utility in differentiating PFAPA syndrome from monogenic periodic fevers. However, because PFAPA syndrome is a morefrequent cause of recurrent fever in e722 GATTORNO et al children, it would be important, to avoid useless genetic testing, to be able to identify, among patients who meet PFAPA syndrome diagnostic criteria, those with a low probability of carrying one of the mutations associated with monogenic periodic fever. In this study, we analyzed the main clinical features that could distinguish patients who meet current PFAPA syndrome criteria with negative versus positive genetic testing results. Furthermore, we tested the accuracy of a set of variables in identifying patients with higher probability of carrying relevant mutations of genes associated with monogenic periodic fever (the Gaslini diagnostic score).10 METHODS Beginning in 2002, a national laboratory facility for the genetic diagnosis of recurrent fevers in children was established at the Gaslini Institute, in collaboration with the Galliera Hospital (Genoa, Italy). The extracellular region (exons 1– 6) of the p55 TNF receptor of the TNFRSF1A gene, the 10 coding exons (exons 2–11) of the MVK gene, and exons 2, 3, 5, and 10 of the MEFV gene were analyzed by means of denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography and DNA sequencing of amplimers displaying anomalous chromatographic patterns, as described previously.10 For each patient, detailed clinical information was collected consistently with a unique questionnaire aimed at recording the frequency (never, sometime, often, or always) of the clinical manifestations associated with periodic fever.10 The inclusion criteria for molecular analysis of genes associated with periodic fever were (1) periodic fever attacks (⬎38°C) of unknown origin, with exclusion of recurrent infections, cyclic neutropenia, and other immunodeficiencies; (2) age at onset of ⬍18 years; (3) symptom-free inter- 720 patients screened for autoinflammatory diseases 351 noneligible for inclusion in the studya 369 Italian patients +24 from other centers Negative for PFAPA criteria: 183 patients Positive for PFAFA criteria: 210 patients Involved in the elaboration of the “Gaslini” diagnostic score: 115 patients Newly diagnosed PFAPA-like patients: 95 FIGURE 1 Flowchart showing the numbers of patients included in the study. aCriteria for exclusion from the study were (1) not fulfilling the inclusion criteria for periodic fever, (2) lack of complete clinical information, and (3) recruitment and screening for suspected cryopyrin-related disorders only. vals characterized by general wellbeing and normal levels of acutephase reactants; and (4) ⱖ2 of the following symptoms during fever attacks: lymphadenopathy, splenomegaly, chest pain, or gastrointestinal, mucocutaneous (including pharyngitis and oral aphthosis), or musculoskeletal manifestations. Up to July 2008, specimens from 720 consecutive patients with suspected autoinflammatory syndrome were received for molecular diagnosis. Among them, 351 were excluded from the present study for ⱖ1 of the following reasons: (1) not fulfilling the inclusion criteria for periodic fever, (2) lack of complete clinical information, or (3) recruitment and screening for suspected cryopyrinrelated disorders.11,12 Results of genetic analyses performed for all 3 genes involved in periodic fevers (MEFV, TNFRSF1A, and MVK) and complete clinical information were therefore available for 369 patients (Fig 1). During the 6-year period, a total of 58 children with a history of recurrent fe- Downloaded from pediatrics.aappublications.org by guest on August 22, 2014 ARTICLES ver were found to carry relevant mutations in the screened genes (29 were compound heterozygous or homozygous for MVK, 21 were compound heterozygous or homozygous for MEFV, and 8 were heterozygous for structural mutations of TNFRSF1A); moreover, 21 patients displayed lowpenetrance mutations of TNFRSF1A, 4 were heterozygous for MVK, and 50 were heterozygous for MEFV. Complete clinical information on an additional 24 genetically positive patients (11 patients with MKD, 4 patients with TRAPS with structural mutations, and 9 patients with complete FMF) from collaborating European centers also was available.10 Clinical information for the latter patients was collected by using the same forms as were used for the Italian patients. Current PFAPA syndrome criteria2,4 were applied to all genetically positive patients and genetically negative patients screened for all 3 genes. Patients were considered positive for PFAPA syndrome criteria if their age at disease onset was ⬍5 years and they exhibited ⱖ1 of the 3 clinical manifestations (cervical lymphadenopathy, erythematous and/or exudative pharyngitis, and/or oral aphthosis) in all febrile episodes. All 30 patients who were compound heterozygous or homozygous and 26 of 50 patients who were heterozygous for MEFV gene mutations were considered positive for FMF criteria.13 The Gaslini diagnostic score was formulated on the basis of statistical analysis of the clinical features of 173 children with periodic fever who were analyzed for the 3 genes.10 A multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated a set of clinical predictors for positive genetic test results. Age at onset, positive family history, thoracic and abdominal pain, diarrhea, and oral aphthosis were the variables included in the final model that prePEDIATRICS Volume 124, Number 4, October 2009 TABLE 1 Mutations Found in Patients With Periodic Fever Fulfilling PFAPA Syndrome Criteria Mutations (n) MVK (N ⫽ 33) I268T/V377I (8) V377I/V377I (5) L265R/V377I (2) V310M/V377I (2) L264F/V377I R215Q/V377I V132I/V377I G211E/V377I H20Q/V377I c.16㛭34del/V377I G171R/I268T G336S/G336S C367S/C367S A148T/I268T V337I/H20P A334T/A334T I268T/P167L P228L/V377I C972T/S314S C886–1G⬎A/V377I a TNFRSF1A (N ⫽ 10) Structural (3) C55Y (2)a c.586㛭612del Low penetrance (7) R92Q (7) MEVF (N ⫽ 40) Composite (7) M694V/V726A M680I/V726A M694V/E148Q L110P/L110P V726A/E148Q V726A/S108R P369S/R408Q Heterozygous (33) E148Q (11) K695R (5) M694V (4) A744S (3) V726A (2) P369S V487M R408Q M680I R717L Individuals from 2 different families. dicted independently the probability of positive genetic test results. The diagnostic score was calculated by using the linear combination of these variables weighted according to the coefficients (logarithm of the odds ratios) estimated with the logistic model and was validated with an independent data set (see www.printo.it/periodicfever). According to the diagnostic score, a probability of ⬎15% identifies patients at high risk of carrying relevant mutations in the 3 genes.10 In this study, the accuracy of the Gaslini diagnostic score in identifying patients at high risk of carrying relevant mutations in any of the 3 genes was calculated for all patients with PFAPA syndrome-like findings who were not involved in the definition of the score.10 Differences in frequencies of symptoms were evaluated by using the 2 test, and differences between average values of continuous variables were evaluated by using the Mann-Whitney U test. Logistic regression was used for multivariate analysis, with positive genetic test results as the dependent variable. RESULTS Differences in Clinical Presentation Between Genetically Positive and Genetically Negative Patients Fulfilling PFAPA Syndrome Criteria Among the 369 Italian patients who were screened for all 3 genes, 199 satisfied the PFAPA syndrome criteria (Fig 1); 130 of those patients tested negative for all 3 genes (group A; genetically negative patients with PFAPA syndrome-like findings), 32 (22 with MKD, 3 with TRAPS, and 7 with FMF) were affected by 1 of the inherited periodic fever syndromes (group B; genetically positive patients with PFAPA syndrome-like findings), and 37 carried low-penetrance or incomplete genotypes (group C; genetically undetermined patients with PFAPA syndromelike findings) (Table 1). Among the 24 patients who were evaluated at other European centers, 11 patients with MKD exhibited a PFAPA syndrome phenotype and were included in group B. The prevalence of the main clinical variables among the 210 patients who Downloaded from pediatrics.aappublications.org by guest on August 22, 2014 e723 TABLE 2 Prevalence of Main Clinical Manifestations During Fever Episodes for Patients With PFAPA Syndrome-like Phenotype, According to Genotype Diagnosis Group A No. of patients Positive family history, % Periodicity, % Oral aphthosis, % Erythematous pharyngitis, % Exudative pharyngitis, % Enlargement of cervical lymph nodes, % Pain in cervical lymph nodes, % Rash, % Genital aphthosis, % Conjunctivitis, % Periorbital edema, % Thoracic pain, % Pleurisy, % Pericarditis, % Abdominal pain, % Diarrhea, % Vomiting, % Splenomegaly, % Arthritis, % Arthralgia, % Myalgia, % Headache, % Age at onset, mean ⫾ SD, mo Fever duration, mean ⫾ SD, d MKD Severe TRAPS FMF Mild TRAPS Heterozygous MEFV 130 13.8 59.4 58.5 83.8 66.9 83.8 49.2 22.3 3.1 20.0 7.7 4.6 0 0 53.1 29.2 30.8 12.3 6.9 43.8 34.6 40.8 18.69 ⫾ 15.1 4.5 ⫾ 2.9 33 9.1 60.6 48.5 69.7 39.4 97.0 81.8 57.6 3.0 21.2 9.1 6.1 0 3.0 100 81.8 75.8 40.6 15.2 72.7 45.5 63.6 11.42 ⫾ 7.0 4.3 ⫾ 1.1 3 100 33.3 33.3 66.7 33.3 66.7 0 66.7 0 0 33.3 0 0 0 100 66.7 66.7 0 0 66.7 66.7 33.3 12.67 ⫾ 11.0 12.6 ⫾ 6.8 7 14.3 57.1 57.1 71.4 57.1 85.7 42.9 0 0 28.6 0 14.3 0 0 100 42.9 14.3 14.3 0 71.4 42.9 57.1 24.8 ⫾ 11.7 3.7 ⫾ 2.4 7 14.3 85.7 71.4 100 71.4 100 71.4 42.9 0 28.6 14.3 0 0 0 71.4 42.9 42.9 27.1 0 28.6 42.9 57.1 34.57 ⫾ 18.7 5.2 ⫾ 4.4 30 20.0 71.4 46.7 73.3 70.0 83.3 53.3 33.3 0 13.3 10.0 6.7 3.3 6.7 56.7 33.3 30.0 16.7 3.3 43.3 26.7 53.3 20.27 ⫾ 17.1 6.6 ⫾ 9.9 Approximately 14% of patients with PFAPA syndrome had a positive family history, a proportion similar to those observed for MKD and FMF, which are autosomal recessive disorders. Although no genetic basis for PFAPA syndrome has been discovered to date, it may well be that the syndrome does not represent a homogenous entity and may include some yet-uncharacterized genetic disease. Episodes recurring with clockwork regularity were present for almost 60% of genetically negative patients with PFAPA syndrome-like findings, a proportion similar to that observed for patients with MKD and for the few patients with genetically proven FMF who fulfilled the PFAPA syndrome criteria (Table 2). Therefore, clockwork periodicity does not seem to represent a distinguishing feature of PFAPA synGATTORNO et al Group C Genetically Negative fulfilled the PFAPA syndrome criteria is shown in Table 2, according to the different disease groups. e724 Group B drome. Moreover, among genetically negative patients with PFAPA syndrome, no evident clinical differences were found between patients who exhibited periodicity of febrile episodes and those who exhibited a moreirregular disease course (multivariate analysis; data not shown). Cardinal features of the PFAPA syndrome, such as oral aphthosis and enlargement of cervical lymph nodes, were observed with similar frequencies in PFAPA syndrome-positive MKD and FMF. Moreover, no meaningful differences in fever duration were observed between genetically negative and genetically positive patients. Disease onset was observed earlier for genetically positive patients with PFAPA syndrome-like findings (mean: 13.7 months; range: 1–36 months), compared with genetically negative patients with PFAPA syndrome-like findings (mean: 18.1 months; range: 1– 60 months) and genetically undeter- mined patients with PFAPA syndromelike findings (mean: 22.9 months; range: 1– 60 months; P ⫽ .02, analysis of variance). Clinical symptoms were compared by taking into account not only their presence or absence but also their frequency (never, sometimes, often, or always). Heterogeneity among the 3 subgroups was observed for a limited number of clinical variables. Genetically positive patients with PFAPA syndrome-like findings had higher frequencies of abdominal pain and diarrhea (P ⬍ .001), vomiting (P ⫽ .006), and cutaneous rash and arthralgia (P ⫽ .01) (Fig 2). Genetically negative patients with PFAPA syndrome-like findings had a higher frequency of exudative pharyngitis, compared with genetically positive patients (P ⫽ .010). Patients belonging to group C showed the same pattern as observed for genetically negative patients with PFAPA syndrome-like findings (Fig 2). Downloaded from pediatrics.aappublications.org by guest on August 22, 2014 ARTICLES % of patients A 70 B 80 60 70 60 50 50 40 40 30 30 20 20 10 10 0 Never Sometime Often Always 0 D 100 70 60 80 50 60 40 30 40 20 10 20 % of patients C 80 0 E Never Sometime Often Often Always Never Sometime Often Always Never Sometime 60 50 50 40 40 30 30 20 20 10 10 0 Sometime F 70 70 60 % of patients 0 Always Never 0 Never Sometime Often Always Often Always Genetically negative PFAPA-like patients (group A) Genetically positive PFAPA-like patients (group B) Genetically undetermined PFAPA-like patients (group C) FIGURE 2 Frequencies of clinical manifestations in the 3 subgroups of patients. P values refer to the 2 heterogeneity test. A, abdominal pain (p ⬍ .001); B, diarrhea (p ⬍ .001); C, vomiting (p ⫽ .006); D, rash (p ⫽ .01); E, arthralgia (p ⫽ .01); F, exudative pharyngitis (p ⫽ .01). Accuracy of the Gaslini Diagnostic Score for Patients With PFAPA Syndrome Phenotype As stated above, the Gaslini diagnostic score was recently formulated on the basis of statistical analysis of the clinical features of children with periodic fever.10 The aim of this part of the study was to test, with an independent set of patients fulfilling the PFAPA syndrome criteria, the ability of the score to classify genetically positive and negative patients correctly. The accuracy of the Gaslini diagnostic score10 was calculated for 95 conPEDIATRICS Volume 124, Number 4, October 2009 secutive patients who satisfied the PFAPA syndrome criteria and were not involved in the original definition of the score (Fig 1); 65 patients belonged to group A, 22 patients belonged to group B (18 with MKD and 4 with FMF), and 8 belonged to group C (2 with R92Q in TNFRSF1A and 6 heterozygous for MEFV). The diagnostic score correctly identified 20 of 22 genetically positive patients with PFAPA syndrome-like findings (sensitivity: 91%), whereas the specificity was 59%. Therefore, the global accuracy of the Gaslini diagnostic score was 66% (Table 3). DISCUSSION This case-control study compared the clinical features of genetically positive and genetically negative patients fulfilling the clinical criteria for the PFAPA syndrome, and we provided evidence of high sensitivity of the Gaslini diagnostic score for the identification of patients with a PFAPA syndrome-like phenotype with a high probability of carrying relevant mutations in genes Downloaded from pediatrics.aappublications.org by guest on August 22, 2014 e725 TABLE 3 Performance of Gaslini Diagnostic Score for Patients With PFAPA Syndrome-like Findings Diagnostic Score Low risk High risk Total n (%) Genetically Negative (Group A) Genetically Positive (Group B) Genetically Undetermined (Group C) Total 38 (58.50) 27 (41.50) 65 (100) 2 (9.10) 20 (90.90) 22 (100) 5 (62.50) 3 (37.50) 8 (100) 45 (47.40) 50 (52.60) 95 (100) associated with monogenic periodic diseases. In 1987, Marshall et al1 first described a group of 12 children who experienced periodic febrile episodes typically associated with some cardinal symptoms (erythematous or exudative pharyngitis, oral aphthosis, and cervical lymph node enlargement), in the absence of signs of infection, immunodeficiency, or other immunemediated or neoplastic disorders. Elevations of acute-phase reactant levels and white blood cell counts, with complete normalization during the symptom-free intervals, are characteristic. Febrile episodes generally are responsive to oral steroid treatment. Complete well-being in the intercritical periods, with normal growth and development, also is typical.2,3,14,15 In 1989, the diagnostic criteria were proposed.4 After the first description, a number of subsequent articles were devoted to the analysis of different aspects of this syndrome, including the incidence of other clinical manifestations associated with febrile episodes, follow-up findings, and responses to treatment and/or tonsillectomy.16–18 The incidence of the clinical manifestations possibly associated with the classic triad during febrile episodes varied widely in the different studies available to date, as summarized in Table 4.1–3,15 Neither the original4 and revised2 diagnostic criteria nor the aforementioned studies took into account the possible clinical overlap between PFAPA syndrome and monogenic autoinflammatory syndromes e726 GATTORNO et al characterized by periodic fever (FMF, MKD, and TRAPS). The identification of the molecular defects associated with monogenic periodic fevers from 1997 onward19–23 and the widening of molecular analyses for patients with periodic fever indicated that these diseases are more frequent than expected and can be observed in populations not originally associated with these disorders.8,10,24–30 Indeed, in Western countries, the rates of detection of mutations in any of the aforementioned disease genes among patients with recurrent fever range from 10% to 20%.31–33 In our study, 52% of children (43 of 82 children) with recurrent fever attributable to monogenic autoinflammatory diseases exhibited positive results for PFAPA syndrome criteria. The proportion was greater for MKD (33 of 40 children) than for FMF (7 of 30 children) or TRAPS (3 of 12 children). Therefore, because PFAPA syndrome is far more prevalent than the aforementioned inherited periodic fevers, it is crucial to identify, among patients with a PFAPA syndrome phenotype, those with higher probabilities of carrying mutations in genes associated with periodic fever. The latter diseases often require a different therapeutic approach and are characterized by more-severe long-term prognoses, compared with PFAPA syndrome.34 Our findings show that PFAPA syndrome criteria alone are not able to distinguish genetically positive from genetically negative patients. To avoid unnecessary genetic testing, it could be useful to have additional clinical parameters that could predict positive results. Therefore, we studied a large population of patients who met the diagnostic criteria for PFAPA syndrome and were fully characterized from the molecular point of view, comparing for the first time the clinical findings for patients with negative genetic testing results and patients affected by a genetic autoinflammatory disease. We found that some of the features that are considered characteristic of PFAPA syndrome, such as clockwork- TABLE 4 Distribution of Clinical Manifestations Associated With Fever Episodes in Different Cohorts of Patients With PFAPA Symptoms Proportion, % 1 Fever Pharyngitis Cervical adenopathy Aphthous stomatitis Malaise Headache Abdominal pain Diarrhea Arthralgia Chills Rhinorrhea Cough Rash Marshall et al (N ⫽ 12) Thomas et al2 (N ⫽ 66) Padeh et al3 (N ⫽ 28) Tasher et al15 (N ⫽ 54) 100 75 67 75 100 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 100 65 77 67 NA 65 45 30 NA 80 18 20 15 100 100 100 68 100 18 18 NA 11 NA NA NA NA NA 96 61 39 NA 46 65 13 NA 61 33 28 4 NA indicates not available. Downloaded from pediatrics.aappublications.org by guest on August 22, 2014 ARTICLES like recurrence of febrile episodes, oral aphthosis, and enlargement of cervical lymph nodes, are present with similar frequencies in MKD and also may be present in some genetically proven pediatric FMF cases. Our descriptive analysis showed that, although the presence alone of some clinical manifestations is not able to distinguish clearly the genetically positive and genetically negative patients with PFAPA syndrome, evaluation of their frequencies in all fever episodes can be much more informative (Fig 2). On the basis of these considerations, we tested the accuracy of the Gaslini score for identification of patients with PFAPA syndrome with a higher probability of carrying relevant mutations in genes associated with periodic fevers. Because the score was developed to discriminate genetically positive and genetically negative patients in a large population of children presenting with periodic fever,10 we analyzed its discriminative ability with a subset of pa- tients fulfilling the PFAPA syndrome criteria who were not involved in its original definition.10 Our results showed that the Gaslini score was able to perform very well in distinguishing genetically negative from genetically positive patients with PFAPA syndrome; it identified correctly 20 of 22 genetically positive patients with PFAPA syndrome-like findings. CONCLUSIONS We propose the use of the Gaslini diagnostic score for all patients with a PFAPA syndrome phenotype. Patients with low risk of carrying relevant mutations may be diagnosed as having PFAPA syndrome without the need for formal exclusion of inherited periodic fever through molecular analysis or other clinical or laboratory investigations. Conversely, patients with high risk should be screened for the mostprobable gene according to their clinical phenotype (ie, positive FMF criteria for patients of Jewish, Arabic, Turkish, or Armenian ethnicity) and/or ancillary laboratory examinations (ie, determination of urinary mevalonic acid levels during fever episodes) and should be classified as having PFAPA syndrome only in the case of negative genetic testing results. Further validation of the diagnostic score in children with a PFAPA syndrome phenotype in different populations is warranted, to establish its accuracy in different ethnic groups. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This work was supported in part by Ricerca Corrente Ministeriale Telethon (project GGP07236), EUROTRAPS (grant agreement Health-F2-2008-200023), and Fondazione C. Golgi (Brescia, Italy). We thank Drs M. Cecconi and F. Caroli for molecular screening, Prof Isabelle Konè-Paut and Prof Patricia Woo for sharing information on some PFAPA syndrome-negative patients with FMF and TRAPS, and Dr Michael Hofer for critical reading of the manuscript. REFERENCES 1. Marshall GS, Edwards KM, Butler J, Lawton AR. Syndrome of periodic fever, pharyngitis, and aphthous stomatitis. J Pediatr. 1987;110(1):43– 46 2. Thomas KT, Feder HM, Lawton AR, Edwards KM. Periodic fever syndrome in children. J Pediatr. 1999;135(1):15–21 3. Padeh S, Brezniak N, Zemer D, et al. Periodic fever, aphthous stomatitis, pharyngitis, and adenopathy syndrome: clinical characteristics and outcome. J Pediatr. 1999;135(1):98 –101 4. Marshall GS, Edwards KM, Lawton AR. PFAPA syndrome. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1989;8(9):658 – 659 5. Kastner DL. Hereditary periodic fever syndromes. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2005:74 – 81 6. Lierl M. Periodic fever syndromes: a diagnostic challenge for the allergist. Allergy. 2007;62(12): 1349 –1358 7. Frenkel J, Houten SM, Waterham HR, et al. Clinical and molecular variability in childhood periodic fever with hyperimmunoglobulinaemia D. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2001;40(5):579 –584 8. D’Osualdo A, Ferlito F, Prigione I, et al. Neutrophils from patients with TNFRSF1A mutations display resistance to tumor necrosis factor-induced apoptosis: pathogenetic and clinical implications. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;54(3):998 –1008 9. Ozen S, Aktay N, Lainka E, Duzova A, Bakkaloglu A, Kallinich T. Disease severity in children and adolescents with familial Mediterranean fever: a comparative study to explore environmental effects on a monogenic disease. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68(2):246 –248 10. Gattorno M, Sormani MP, D’Osualdo A, et al. A diagnostic score for molecular analysis of hereditary autoinflammatory syndromes with periodic fever in children. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;58(6): 1823–1832 11. Prieur AM, Griscelli C, Lampert F, et al. A chronic, infantile, neurological, cutaneous and articular (CINCA) syndrome: a specific entity analysed in 30 patients. Scand J Rheumatol Suppl. 1987;66: 57– 68 12. Neven B, Callebaut I, Prieur AM, et al. Molecular basis of the spectral expression of CIAS1 muta- PEDIATRICS Volume 124, Number 4, October 2009 Downloaded from pediatrics.aappublications.org by guest on August 22, 2014 e727 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. e728 GATTORNO et al tions associated with phagocytic cell-mediated autoinflammatory disorders CINCA/NOMID, MWS, and FCU. Blood. 2004;103(7):2809 –2815 Livneh A, Langevitz P, Zemer D, et al. Criteria for the diagnosis of familial Mediterranean fever. Arthritis Rheum. 1997;40(10):1879 –1885 Long SS. Syndrome of periodic fever, aphthous stomatitis, pharyngitis, and adenitis (PFAPA): what it isn’t: what is it? J Pediatr. 1999;135(1):1–5 Tasher D, Somekh E, Dalal I. PFAPA syndrome: new clinical aspects disclosed. Arch Dis Child. 2006;91(12):981–984 Berlucchi M, Meini A, Plebani A, Bonvini MG, Lombardi D, Nicolai P. Update on treatment of Marshall’s syndrome (PFAPA syndrome): report of five cases with review of the literature. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2003;112(4):365–369 Tasher D, Stein M, Dalal I, Somekh E. Colchicine prophylaxis for frequent periodic fever, aphthous stomatitis, pharyngitis and adenitis episodes. Acta Paediatr. 2008;97(8):1090 –1092 Renko M, Salo E, Putto-Laurila A, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of tonsillectomy in periodic fever, aphthous stomatitis, pharyngitis, and adenitis syndrome. J Pediatr. 2007;151(3):289 –292 French FMF Consortium. A candidate gene for familial Mediterranean fever. Nat Genet. 1997;17(1): 25–31 International FMF Consortium. Ancient missense mutations in a new member of the RoRet gene family are likely to cause familial Mediterranean fever. Cell. 1997;90(4):797– 807 Drenth JP, Cuisset L, Grateau G, et al. Mutations in the gene encoding mevalonate kinase cause hyper-IgD and periodic fever syndrome. Nat Genet. 1999;22(2):178 –181 Houten SM, Kuis W, Duran M, et al. Mutations in MVK, encoding mevalonate kinase, cause hyperimmunoglobulinaemia D and periodic fever syndrome. Nat Genet. 1999;22(2):175–177 McDermott MF, Aksentijevich I, Galon J, et al. Germline mutations in the extracellular domains of the 55 kDa TNF receptor, TNFR1, define a family of dominantly inherited autoinflammatory syndromes. Cell. 1999;97(1):133–144 Drenth JP, Haagsma CJ, van der Meer JW. Hyperimmunoglobulinemia D and periodic fever syndrome: the clinical spectrum in a series of 50 patients. Medicine (Baltimore). 1994;73(3): 133–144 Aksentijevich I, Galon J, Soares M, et al. The tumor-necrosis-factor receptor-associated periodic syndrome: new mutations in TNFRSF1A, ancestral origins, genotype-phenotype studies, and evidence for further genetic heterogeneity of periodic fevers. Am J Hum Genet. 2001;69(2):301–314 Aganna E, Hammond L, Hawkins PN, et al. Heterogeneity among patients with tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated periodic syndrome phenotypes. Arthritis Rheum. 2003;48(9): 2632–2644 D’Osualdo A, Picco P, Caroli F, et al. MVK mutations and associated clinical features in Italian patients affected with autoinflammatory disorders and recurrent fever. Eur J Hum Genet. 2005; 13(3):314 –320 Naruto T, Nakagishi Y, Mori M, Miyamae T, Imagawa T, Yokota S. Hyper-IgD syndrome with novel mutation in a Japanese girl. Mod Rheumatol. 2009;19(1):96 –99 Coban E, Terzioglu E. A patient with hyper-IgD syndrome in Antalya, Turkey. Clin Rheumatol. 2004;23(2):177–178 Demirkaya E, Caglar MK, Waterham HR, Topaloglu R, Ozen S. A patient with hyper-IgD syndrome responding to anti-TNF treatment. Clin Rheumatol. 2007;26(10):1757–1759 Simon A, van der Meer JWM, Vesely R, et al. Approach to genetic analysis in the diagnosis of hereditary autoinflammatory syndromes. Rheumatology. 2006;45(3):269 –273 Federici L, Rittore-Domingo C, Kone-Paut I, et al. A decision tree for genetic diagnosis of hereditary periodic fever in unselected patients. Ann Rheum Dis. 2006;65(11):1427–1432 Tchernitchko D, Moutereau S, Legendre M, et al. MEFV analysis is of particularly weak diagnostic value for recurrent fevers in Western European Caucasian patients. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;52(11): 3603–3605 van der Hilst JC, Bodar EJ, Barron KS, et al. Long-term follow-up, clinical features, and quality of life in a series of 103 patients with hyperimmunoglobulinemia D syndrome. Medicine (Baltimore). 2008;87(6):301–310 Downloaded from pediatrics.aappublications.org by guest on August 22, 2014 Differentiating PFAPA Syndrome From Monogenic Periodic Fevers Marco Gattorno, Roberta Caorsi, Antonella Meini, Marco Cattalini, Silvia Federici, Francesco Zulian, Elisabetta Cortis, Giuseppina Calcagno, Alberto Tommasini, Rita Consolini, Gabriele Simonini, Maria Antonietta Pelagatti, Maurizia Baldi, Isabella Ceccherini, Alessandro Plebani, Joost Frenkel, Maria Pia Sormani and Alberto Martini Pediatrics 2009;124;e721; originally published online September 28, 2009; DOI: 10.1542/peds.2009-0088 Updated Information & Services including high resolution figures, can be found at: http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/124/4/e721.full.h tml References This article cites 32 articles, 6 of which can be accessed free at: http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/124/4/e721.full.h tml#ref-list-1 Citations This article has been cited by 9 HighWire-hosted articles: http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/124/4/e721.full.h tml#related-urls Subspecialty Collections This article, along with others on similar topics, appears in the following collection(s): Allergy/Immunology http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/collection/allergy:im munology_sub Immunologic Disorders http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/collection/immunolo gic_disorders_sub Permissions & Licensing Information about reproducing this article in parts (figures, tables) or in its entirety can be found online at: http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/site/misc/Permissions.xht ml Reprints Information about ordering reprints can be found online: http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/site/misc/reprints.xhtml PEDIATRICS is the official journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics. A monthly publication, it has been published continuously since 1948. PEDIATRICS is owned, published, and trademarked by the American Academy of Pediatrics, 141 Northwest Point Boulevard, Elk Grove Village, Illinois, 60007. Copyright © 2009 by the American Academy of Pediatrics. All rights reserved. Print ISSN: 0031-4005. Online ISSN: 1098-4275. Downloaded from pediatrics.aappublications.org by guest on August 22, 2014
© Copyright 2024