1. science
2. weather
3. meteorological disaster
4. flood

CHRISTCHURCH BOROUGH COUNCIL
PLANNING SERVICES
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT ON
CURRENT PLANNING APPLICATIONS
SORTED BY WARD
02 December 2014
The attached list contains all undetermined planning applications together with their current state of progress.
In accordance with the Constitution adopted by the Council on 5th September 2001 (as amended) Members have 5
working days from the date of recommendation to refer any application to the Planning Control Committee. The
request must be in writing specifying the planning reason for it.
Any application where the final recommendation is contrary to the initial recommendation will be referred to the
Committee. Any application which attracts 12 or more objections, where the recommendation is to approve, or a
petition containing 25 or more signatures will also be referred to the Committee. Other applications may be referred at
the discretion of the Development Management Manager.
weeklywardlistrpt
Page 1
the discretion of the Development Management Manager.
Page 2
Date 02/12/2014
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
WARD:
8/14/0567 LA
Burton & Winkton
Target Date:
11/12/2014
Logged Date: 26/Nov/2014
Location
Burton Primary School Campbell Road
Proposal
Erection of single storey detached pre-school
and associated landscaping
Applicant
Member Referral Date
Ms D Thomas
23/12/2014
Officer:
Agent:
Jo Cleaves
Process
DEL
Recommendation
To
Latest Update
Public Consultation
None to date.
Consultee Response
Target Date:
8/14/0562 Full
02/01/2015
Logged Date: 19/Nov/2014
Location
8 Redwood Drive Homefield Park (Winkton
Conservation Area)
Proposal
Erection of car port over existing parking
space, with roller shutter door
Applicant
Member Referral Date
Mr C Adams
Agent:
16/12/14
Officer:
Quantum Group - N
White
Richard Castro-Parker
Process
DEL
Recommendation
To
Latest Update
Public Consultation
1 letter of objection
Consultee Response
weeklywardlistrpt
Page 2
Page 3
Date 02/12/2014
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
WARD:
8/14/0470 Full
Burton & Winkton
Target Date:
19/11/2014
Logged Date: 03/Oct/2014
Location
112 Stony Lane Burton
Proposal
Demolish existing dwelling and erection of 2
detached 3 bed dwellings, with revised
access and parking provisions
Member Referral Date
Applicant
Caleb Development
Agent:
4/11/14
Officer:
Ken Parke Planning
Consultants - C
McNulty
Kevin Chilvers
Process
DEL
Recommendation
To GRANT
Latest Update
Subject to legal agreement
Public Consultation
7 letters of objection 1 other letter
Consultee Response
Transport Development
Management
Rec 20/10/2014 - NO OBJECTION, subject to the
following condition(s):
Before the development is utilised the existing
highway vehicular crossings shall be expunged
and reinstated to a specification which shall be
submitted to and approved in writing by the Local
Planning Authority.
The development hereby permitted shall not be
occupied or utilised until the parking and turning
indicated on the submitted details has been
constructed. Thereafter, these areas shall be
maintained, kept free from obstruction and
available for the purposes specified.
Before the development is commenced the first 5
metres of the access crossing, measured from the
nearside edge of the carriageway, shall be laid out
and constructed to a specification submitted to and
approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority.
Natural England
weeklywardlistrpt
Reason: In the interests of road safety.
Rec 13/10/2014 - objects to this application
proposal unless the applicant contributes to the
mitigation set out in the SPD in accordance with
the levels and procedures for this contribution.
This advice on mitigation also applies in meeting
legislative and policy considerations on the
protection, conservation and enhancement of the
heathland SSSIs and Ramsar site.
Page 3
Page 4
Date 02/12/2014
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
WARD:
Burton & Winkton
Burton Parish Council
Rec 27/10/2014 - no objection in principle as
similar developments have already been built in
this area. Members, however, still have concerns
over access and exit at this site as they consider
this dangerous being on the corner of Footners
Lane and Stony Lane with the amount of fast
moving traffic in the area.
Target Date:
8/14/0095 Full
18/04/2014
Logged Date: 07/Mar/2014
Location
Salisbury Road Burton (Winkton Conservation
Area)
Proposal
Erect 4x age restricted dwellings (demolish
classrooms and games courts) (Revised
scheme following withdrawal of 8/13/0384)
Applicant
Member Referral Date
Mr J Shaffer
Agent:
01/04/2014
Officer:
Quantum Group - N
White
Alex Sebbinger
Process
DEL
Recommendation
To GRANT
Latest Update
Public Consultation
6 letters of support 2 other letters
Consultee Response
Transport Development
Management
Burton Parish Council
weeklywardlistrpt
Rec 01/04/2014 - NO OBJECTION, subject to the
following condition: The development hereby
permitted shall not be occupied or utilised until the
access, turning and parking indicated on the
submitted details have been constructed.
Thereafter, these areas shall be maintained, kept
free from obstruction and available for the
purposes specified.
Reason: In the interests of road safety.
Note to Case Officer. Refuse collection location(s)
need to be carefully addressed, especially as the
road will not be adopted and refuse lorries might
not enter the site.
Rec 02/04/2014 - No objection in principal but with
the following qualifications:
1.Concerns over provision of parking spaces for
visitors as parking is becoming an issue in Winkton
since the opening of Homefield Grange and
Homefield Park.
2.Providing requirements of green belt
developments are met.
Page 4
Page 5
Date 02/12/2014
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
WARD:
Burton & Winkton
Target Date:
8/13/0385 Cons
31/10/2013
Logged Date: 24/Sep/2013
Location
Former Homefield School, Salisbury Road
Proposal
Demolition of remaining classrooms and
games court
Applicant
Member Referral Date
Mr J Shaffer
Agent:
05/11/2013
Officer:
Quantum Group - C
Wilsdon
Alex Sebbinger
Process
DEL
Recommendation
To GRANT
Latest Update
Public Consultation
1 letter of support
Winkton Residents Association have no objection to application 8/13/0385
Consultee Response
Target Date:
8/13/0289 CLEUD
05/08/2013
Logged Date: 13/Jun/2013
Location
The Barn, 41 Burley Road
Proposal
Certificate of lawfulness to allow the
continued use of 'The Barn' as a residential
dwelling
Applicant
Member Referral Date
Mr I Kendall
Agent:
17/09/2013
Officer:
Richard Castro-Parker
Process
COM
Recommendation
To LAWFUL
Latest Update
Public Consultation
None to date.
Consultee Response
Count of applications:
weeklywardlistrpt
6
Page 5
Page 6
Date 02/12/2014
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
WARD:
Grange
Target Date:
8/14/0416 Full
22/10/2014
Logged Date: 29/Aug/2014
Location
56 Mudeford Lane
Proposal
Erection of detached 3 bed dwelling with
associated parking and access following
demolition of the existing garage
Member Referral Date
Applicant
AJ Developments Ltd
Agent:
23/09/2014
Officer:
Anders Roberts &
Assoc
Kevin Chilvers
Process
DEL
Recommendation
To GRANT
Latest Update
Awaiting clarification regarding affordable housing contribution
Awaiting final clarification
Public Consultation
1 letter of objection
Consultee Response
Transport Development
Management
Rec 08/09/2014 - NO OBJECTION, subject to the
following condition(s):
The development hereby permitted shall not be
occupied or utilised until the parking indicated on
the submitted details has been constructed.
Thereafter, these areas shall be maintained, kept
free from obstruction and available for the
purposes specified.
The development hereby permitted shall not be
occupied or utilised until provision has been made
to ensure that no surface water drains directly from
the site onto the adjacent public highway.
Natural England
Count of applications:
weeklywardlistrpt
Reason: In the interests of road safety.
Rec 04/09/2014 - Natural England objects to this
application proposal unless the applicant
contributes to the mitigation set out in the SPD in
accordance with the levels and procedures for this
contribution.
This advice on mitigation also applies in meeting
legislative and policy considerations on the
protection, conservation and enhancement of the
heathland SSSIs and Ramsar site.
1
Page 6
Page 7
Date 02/12/2014
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
WARD:
Highcliffe
Target Date:
8/14/0555 Full
13/01/2015
Logged Date: 01/Dec/2014
Location
22 Abingdon Drive
Applicant
Proposal
Remodel existing property to include new
gable to front. Install balustrade to rear
Member Referral Date
Agent:
Mr & Mrs Pike
23/12/2014
Officer:
Coast & Country
Architecture - D Crain
Alison Underwood
Process
DEL
Recommendation
To
Latest Update
Public Consultation
None to date.
Consultee Response
Target Date:
8/14/0556 Full
13/01/2015
Logged Date: 28/Nov/2014
Location
420 Lymington Road
Proposal
Demolition of existing building and erection
of block of 2 A1 (Retail) shops and 8 (7x1 and
1x2 bed) apartments with bin and cycle store
and access from Poplar Close
Applicant
Member Referral Date
Tony Wood Holdings Ltd
Agent:
23/12/2014
Officer:
Anders Roberts &
Assoc
Kevin Chilvers
Process
DEL
Recommendation
To
Latest Update
Public Consultation
None to date.
Consultee Response
weeklywardlistrpt
Page 7
Page 8
Date 02/12/2014
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
WARD:
Highcliffe
Target Date:
8/14/0546 Full
12/01/2015
Logged Date: 27/Nov/2014
Location
38 Wharncliffe Road
Applicant
Proposal
Erection of 1 x 5 bed dwelling following
demolition of the existing property
Member Referral Date
Jackson Developments Ltd
Agent:
23/12/14
Officer:
Anders Roberts &
Assoc
Kevin Chilvers
Process
DEL
Recommendation
To
Latest Update
Public Consultation
None to date.
Consultee Response
Target Date:
8/14/0528 CLEUD
25/12/2014
Logged Date: 05/Nov/2014
Location
19a Rothesay Drive
Proposal
Certificate of Lawfulness for loft conversion
to existing roof space, including flat roof
dormer on rear elevation, alterations to the
existing dormer and roof light to the front
elevation
Applicant
Member Referral Date
Mr & Mrs Carson
Agent:
2/12/14
Officer:
The Design Studio C Morris
Diana Mezzogori-Curran
Process
DEL
Recommendation
To LAWFUL
Latest Update
Public Consultation
None to date.
Consultee Response
weeklywardlistrpt
Page 8
Page 9
Date 02/12/2014
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
WARD:
Highcliffe
Target Date:
8/14/0527 Full
15/12/2014
Location
1 Abingdon Drive
Proposal
Erection of single garage
Logged Date: 30/Oct/2014
Applicant
Member Referral Date
Mr & Mrs Jordan
Agent:
2/12/14
Officer:
The Design Studio C Morris
Alison Underwood
Process
DEL
Recommendation
To GRANT
Latest Update
Public Consultation
None to date.
Consultee Response
Transport Development
Management
Rec 04/11/2014 - No objection to the proposal.
Target Date:
8/14/0526 CLOPD
15/12/2014
Logged Date: 30/Oct/2014
Location
1 Abingdon Drive
Proposal
Certificate of Lawfulness for a proposed
development to replace existing conservatory
with a rear conservatory. Extend existing rear
flat roof dormer
Applicant
Member Referral Date
Mr & Mrs Jordan
Agent:
9/12/14
Chris Morris
Officer:
Alison Underwood
Process
DEL
Recommendation
To LAWFUL
Latest Update
Public Consultation
None to date.
Consultee Response
weeklywardlistrpt
Page 9
Page 10
Date 02/12/2014
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
WARD:
Highcliffe
8/14/0505 CLOPD
Target Date:
04/12/2014
Logged Date: 21/Oct/2014
Location
22 Jesmond Avenue
Applicant
Proposal
Certificate of Lawfulness for the erection of a
single storey extension with false pitch, to
rear following demolition of the existing
consevatory
Member Referral Date
18/11/2014
Officer:
Agent:
Mr A Gallop
Melanie Smith
Process
DEL
Recommendation
To LAWFUL
Latest Update
Public Consultation
None to date.
Consultee Response
Target Date:
8/14/0413 CondR
13/10/2014
Logged Date: 27/Aug/2014
Location
18a Bucehayes Close
Proposal
Variation of Condition 2 of Application
8/14/0056 to allow the extension of units 3 & 4
to incorporate a third bedroom to both
dwellings (AMENDED
DESCRIPTION)(AMENDED PLANS REC
3/11/14)
Applicant
Member Referral Date
Moortown Deveopments Ltd
Agent:
07/10/2014
Officer:
Anders Roberts &
Assoc
Kevin Chilvers
Process
DEL
Recommendation
To GRANT
Latest Update
Public Consultation
10 letters of objection
Consultee Response
Transport Development
Management
Rec 02/09/2014 - NO OBJECTION to the proposal.
Rec 07/11/2014 - No objection to the proposal.
weeklywardlistrpt
Page 10
Page 11
Date 02/12/2014
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
WARD:
Highcliffe
Target Date:
8/13/0393 Outl
26/11/2013
Logged Date: 29/Aug/2013
Location
Cobbs Holiday Park Gordon Road
Proposal
Outline Application to erect 29x3 bed and 3x4
bed open market houses, 3x1 bed and 3x2
bed flats and 3x3 bed houses for social
housing and 4x2 bed intermediate houses
(total 45 dwellings). Matter for consideration
is access and layout. (Outline Planning
Permission)(AMENDED DESCRIPTION &
AMENDED PLANS)
Member Referral Date
Applicant
Cobbs Holiday Park
Agent:
24/09/2013
Officer:
Ken Parke Planning
Consultants - K
Parke
Alex Sebbinger
Process
COM
Recommendation
To GRANT
Latest Update
1. You are advised that the parking area and communal areas surrounding the proposed affordable
housing must be designed so that the landscaping is provided to ensure that the development is
softened in relation to the surroundings. Furthermore, you are also advised in reserved matters
submissions that landscaping must be provided between the proposed access road and No. 30 Gordon
Road.
2. In accordance with paragraphs 186 and 187 of the NPPF Christchurch Borough Council (CBC) takes a
positive and proactive approach to development proposals focused on solutions. CBC work with
applicants/agents in a positive and proactive manner by;
•
offering a pre-application advice service, and
•
as appropriate updating applications/agents of any issues that may arise in the processing of their
application and where possible suggesting solutions.
•
The applicant was provided the opportunity to submit amendments to the scheme/ address issues which
were found to be acceptable and permission was granted/
Public Consultation
9 letters of objection 1 letter of support 2 other letters
Consultee Response
Environment Agency
weeklywardlistrpt
Rec 25/09/2013 - no ojection in principle to
development occuring on this site however object
to the current application on flood risk grounds.
Rec 30/10/13 - We note that the agent for the site
has responded to our objection by confirming that
it is an outline planning application for 45 dwellings
with all matter reserved except for the point of
access. However we maintain our objection that
the application is supported by an unsatisfactory
FRA (See letter for reasons of objection)
Received 22/11/13 We have received additional information /
comments from Ken Parke Planning, dated 30
October 2013, and have the following comments to
make.
Page 11
Page 12
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
WARD:
Date 02/12/2014
Highcliffe
Flood Risk
We note that the agent for the site has responded
to our objection by submitting alternative layouts
that indicate that minimal culverting of the
watercourse would occur. The agent states that the
majority of the site is in Flood Zone 1, when
considering our flood map. However, it our opinion
that until the applicant has a full understanding of
flood risk to the site from all flood risk sources (i.e.
Fluvial, surface water, groundwater etc.) including
allowances for climate change, they cannot be fully
informed as to the available land for development
potential. Therefore, we do not believe that the
applicant can demonstrate the Sequential
Approach, as they do not know how much of the
site is reasonably available outside of the flood risk
areas to deliver the number / type of units under
this application.
Whilst we appreciate that this Outline Application
with all matters reserved except for access, it
would be remiss of us not to advise at this stage
on this issue that could have an impact on the
development potential of the site / future reserved
matters applications. Therefore, as no updated
Flood Risk Assessment has been submitted we
maintain our objection that the application is
supported by an unsatisfactory FRA. However, if
you feel that the matters below can be adequately
addressed within any future reserved matters
application then please re-consult us.In order for
the applicant to gain a full understanding of the
present day and future (including climate change)
Flood Zones (including the Functional Floodplain Flood Zone 3b) affecting this site to apply the
Sequential Approach we would expect any
applicant to have:
-an up to date comprehensive flood estimation
hydrological study and hydraulic model of both the
Chewton Common stream and the Cranemoor
Dyke; and
-the model to include climate change and blockage
/ failure sensitivity testing.
For further advice notwithstanding the above and
irrespective of Flood Zone, our Asset Performance
Engineers would wish to see a minimum 2m
easement adjacent to all Main River channels on
this site to allow for future maintenance.
We would also wish for any new development to
enhance the watercourses and open up any
culverts on site to improve the site. This should be
weeklywardlistrpt
Page 12
Page 13
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
WARD:
Date 02/12/2014
Highcliffe
factored into any modelling of the watercourses.
NOTES TO LPA / APPLICANT
We would not wish to see private gardens fronting
or abutting the Main River. We would not wish to
see any construction / ground raising / obstructions
to flow etc. Placed within the Flood Zones.
All works (permanent or temporary) in, under, over,
or within 8m of a Main River (the Cranemoor Dyke
to the north of the site and the Chewton Common
Stream that runs through the heart of the site are
both Main Rivers) require our prior written Flood
Defence Consent under the Water Resources Act
and Land Drainage Byelaws. The need for this
consent is over and above the need for planning
permission.
Rec 23/12/13 - Concerns remain because the
application specifically states number of units as
weLl as access for approval at this stage. If no
detailed FRA is availabe EA do not accept that the
number of units and/or any indicative layout can be
accepted at this stage. Once the broad principle of
developable area has been agreed the number of
units and layout can be set. The LPA must be
satisfied that they can secure a condition to ensure
no development (and permit only public open
space) within the future Functional Floodplain
(considered to be land below 25.45mAOD adopting
a precautionary approach). If this were the case
then the EA could remove objection subject to
conditions including appropriate finished floor
levels for all dwellings and surface water
management scheme. (SEE EMAIL FOR
FURTHER ADVICE AND COMMENTS)
Received 07/02/2014
Thank you for consulting the Environment Agency
on the Flood Risk Assessment (FRA) report
prepared by Such Salinger Peters (dated Jan
2014) that supports this application. We have the
following comments to make.
Flood Risk
We have had the FRA report peer reviewed by
consultants on our behalf. The review has
highlighted a number of areas of concern over the
FRA and the supporting hydrology and hydraulic
model. Therefore, until we are satisfied that the
FRA and accompanying details are fit for purpose
we are unable to offer a 'no objection' response to
this planning application which now includes the
proposed layout.
Due to the technical nature of the modelling / FRA
weeklywardlistrpt
Page 13
Page 14
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
WARD:
Date 02/12/2014
Highcliffe
we are corresponding directly with the FRA
consultant over these issues. We would anticipate
that a revised FRA or addendum to this FRA will
need to be submitted to support his planning in
due course.
Rec 09/04/2014 - We have no objection the outline
application, which now includes access and layout,
subject to the following conditions and informatives
being included in any planning permission granted.
Flood Risk
With respect to FRA Volume 1 of 2 Version 3
(Third Issue dated 17/3/14) and Model Report
(March 2014) we have no further concerns over the
model or hydrology. However flow estimation in
small semi-permeable catchments like this is
problematic and can be subject to considerable
uncertainty. Should re-development of this site
take place extremely careful detailed design
consideration and a conservative approach will be
required to ensure no significant flood risk to the
site or increase in flood risk to the surrounding
area.
CONDITION:
No development shall commence until a scheme
for the detailed design of the proposed re-designed
Main River channel though the site, including any
removal of existing structures or addition of new
structures, ensuring no flood risk to the site or
increase in flood risk elsewhere has been
submitted and approved by the Local Planning
Authority. The scheme shall be implemented prior
to commencement of development of the site. The
scheme shall include details of how the redesigned
channel and any associated structures will be
managed and maintained over the lifetime of the
development.
REASON:
To ensure appropriate flood risk mitigation and
minimise flood risk.
CONDITION:
No development shall commence until a scheme
for the detailed design of failsafe measures
required to safely capture and route all existing
fluvial flow that exceeds the Gordons Road culvert
and flows overland into the site, during events up
to and including the 1 in 100 year event, into the
site and safely back into the channel without
increasing flood risk has been submitted and
weeklywardlistrpt
Page 14
Page 15
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
WARD:
Date 02/12/2014
Highcliffe
approved by the Local Planning Authority. The
scheme shall be implemented prior to
commencement of development of the site.
REASON:
To ensure appropriate flood risk mitigation and
minimise flood risk.
CONDITION:
Finished floor levels should be at least 300mm
(600mm preferably) higher than the 100-year flood
levels with blockage and 10% increase in
roughness to reflect uncertainties in the modelling.
REASON:
To ensure appropriate flood risk mitigation and
minimise flood risk.
Surface Water Management
CONDITION:
No development shall commence until a detailed
scheme for limiting the surface water run-off
generated by all events up to and including the 1 in
100 year critical storm including climate change
allowance, such that it will not exceed the run-off
from the undeveloped site and will not increase the
risk of flooding off-site has been submitted and
approved by the Local Planning Authority. The
details shall include supporting strategy details
including scheme drawings and calculations,
including demonstration that the critical storm is
being used, and that any exceedence flows will be
contained prior to controlled discharge, and details
of how the scheme will be managed and
maintained over the lifetime of the development.
REASON
To ensure adequate allowance for surface water
management is made and that the scheme.
We would expect the surface water management
scheme for the proposed development to meet the
following criteria before discharge of the condition
below:
- A clearly labelled drainage layout plan showing
the pipe networks and any attenuation ponds,
soakaways and drainage storage tanks etc. This
plan should show any pipe node numbers referred
to in the drainage calculations and the invert and
cover levels of manholes.
- A manhole schedule.
- Model runs to demonstrate that the critical storm
weeklywardlistrpt
Page 15
Page 16
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
WARD:
Date 02/12/2014
Highcliffe
Wessex Water
weeklywardlistrpt
duration is being used.
- Confirmation of the appropriate discharge rate,
with any flow control devices indicated on the plan
with the rate of discharge stated. Any rainfall runoff
from the site must be limited to existing rainfall runoff rates and volumes and discharged
incrementally for all return periods up to and
including the 1 in 100 year storm. Using the IOH
124 method of flow estimation we estimate the
Q100 to be approximately 10.5l/s/ha and
recommend this figure is used in the calculations.
- Calculations showing the volume of attenuation
provided, demonstrating how the system operates
during the 1 in 100 critical duration storm event.
- The surface water drainage system must
incorporate enough attenuation to deal with the
surface water run-off from the site up to the critical
1% Annual Probability of Flooding (or 1 in a 100year flood) event, including a 30% allowance for
climate change for the lifetime of the development.
Drainage calculations must be included to
demonstrate this and that the critical event is being
used (e.g. Windes or similar sewer modelling
package calculations that include the necessary
attenuation volume).
- If there is any surcharge or 'exceedence' flooding
from the system, overland flood flow routes and
'collection/storage' areas within the site (e.g. car
parks, landscaping) must be shown on a drawing.
All exceedence flow must be contained and
attenuated within the site prior to discharge into the
water course, and must not be allowed to simply
flow uncontrolled into the watercourse. CIRIA good
practice guide for designing for exceedance in
urban drainage (C635) should be used.
- There must be no attenuation areas within areas
of fluvial floodplain.
- The adoption and maintenance of the drainage
system must be addressed and clearly stated.
- Where infiltration forms part of the proposed
stormwater system such as infiltration trenches
and soakaways, soakage test results and test
locations are to be submitted in accordance with
BRE digest 365.
Rec 17/9/2013 - Comments - See letter for advice
Received 19/3/14
No additional observations in this instance and
refer to previous correspondence.
Page 16
Page 17
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
Date 02/12/2014
WARD:
Highcliffe
Transport Development
Management
Rec 30/9/13 - extension requested
Rec 23/10/13 - No objection in principle for the
details relating to access of this outline application
subject to an amended plan being submitted
showing 4 revisions. Upon receipt of which final
observations will be provided.
Rec 30/01/2014 - Referring to amended plans
2608-03F & 2608-04F, some issues still remain to
be addressed. DCC still have no objection subject
to an acceptable amended plan being submitted.
Received 20/02/2014
In addition to the application plans I refer to the
amended plan(s) received from the agent on
30/1/14, namely Nos. 2608-03G and 2608-04G.
The County Highway Authority has NO
OBJECTION, subject to the following conditions:
The development hereby permitted shall not be
occupied or utilised until the access, geometric
highway layout, turning and parking areas shown
on Drawing Number 2608-03G have been
constructed, unless otherwise agreed in writing by
the Local Planning Authority. Thereafter, these
shall be maintained, kept free from obstruction and
available for the purposes specified.
Reason: In the interests of road safety.
Before the development commences or to a
timescale to be submitted to and agreed in writing
by the Local Planning Authority a scheme showing
precise details for the piping or culverting of the
roadside ditch for the length/width of the access
shall be submitted to the Local Planning Authority.
Any such scheme shall require approval to be
obtained in writing from the Local Planning
Authority. The approved scheme shall be
constructed before development commences.
Reason: In the interests of road safety.
Note to Case Officer:
Please issue the following important informatives
with any planning consent:
The applicant is advised that, notwithstanding this
consent, if it is intended that the highway layout be
offered for public adoption under Section 38 of the
Highways Act 1980, the applicant should contact
Dorset County Council‟s Developer-Led
Infrastructure team. They can be reached by
weeklywardlistrpt
Page 17
Page 18
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
WARD:
Date 02/12/2014
Highcliffe
telephone at 01305 225401, by email at
[email protected], or in writing at Developer-Led
Infrastructure, Dorset County Council, County Hall,
Dorchester, DT1 1XJ.
The applicant is advised that notwithstanding this
consent, Section 184 of the Highways Act 1980
requires the proper construction of vehicle
crossings over kerbed footways, verges or other
highway land. Before commencement of any works
on the public highway, Dorset County Council‟s
Dorset Highways should be consulted to agree on
the detailed specification. Contact can be made by
telephone to Dorset Direct (01305 221000), by
email at [email protected], or in
writing at Dorset Highways, Dorset County Council,
County Hall, Dorchester, DT1 1XJ.
The existing street lighting column may to be
relocated/replaced and sufficient time and
resource should be allowed for this. The preferred
location in this type of situation may be directly
opposite the new junction. Contact can be made by
telephone to Dorset Direct (01305 221000), by
email at [email protected], or in
writing at Dorset Highways, Dorset County Council,
County Hall, Dorchester, DT1 1XJ.
Changes to the Flood and Water Management Act
2010 effective on 6th April 2012, grant certain
powers to Lead Local Flood Authorities, i.e. Dorset
County Council, and involves works to ordinary
watercourses; these being all watercourses which
are not designated 'Main River' by the Environment
Agency.
Activities which require prior Land Drainage
Consent (LDC) include: permanent and temporary
obstructions to watercourse flow, including the
installation of culverts. From 6th April 2012 all
applications for LDC on ordinary watercourses are
to be made to the Flood Risk Management team
([email protected]) who are part of the
Developer Lead Infrastructure Group / Dorset
Highways Management Service. Applications with
relevance to Main Rivers and associated flood
plains are to be made to the Environment Agency
in the usual way.
I confirm that in this instance no transport
contribution will be required.
weeklywardlistrpt
Page 18
Page 19
Date 02/12/2014
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
WARD:
Highcliffe
8/12/0412 CondR
Target Date:
30/11/2012
Logged Date: 09/Oct/2012
Location
2A Kilmington Way
Applicant
Proposal
Variation of Condition 1 of appeal
APP/E1210/A/11/2164161 to allow the
windows of bedroom 2 & 3 of Plot 1 and
bedroom 3 of Plot 2 to be opening to a
maximum of 100mm and have opening
fanlights. Variation of Condition 3 of
application 8/10/0557 to allow the retention of
the existing boundary treatment between 2 &
2D Kilmington Way
Member Referral Date
Mr J Tye
Agent:
27/11/12
Miles & Co
Officer:
Mark Taylor
Process
DEL
Recommendation
To REFUSE
Latest Update
Public Consultation
1 letter of objection
Consultee Response
Count of applications:
weeklywardlistrpt
10
Page 19
Page 20
Date 02/12/2014
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
WARD:
Jumpers
8/14/0510 CLOPD
Target Date:
12/12/2014
Logged Date: 23/Oct/2014
Location
28 Bronte Avenue
Proposal
Certificate of lawfulness for the conversion of
the existing garage to habitable
accommodation
Applicant
Member Referral Date
Mr & Mrs Gadsden
Agent:
9/12/14
JC Architectural
Design
Officer:
Richard Castro-Parker
Process
DEL
Recommendation
To GRANT
Latest Update
Public Consultation
None to date.
Consultee Response
weeklywardlistrpt
Page 20
Page 21
Date 02/12/2014
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
WARD:
Jumpers
Target Date:
8/14/0474 Full
27/11/2014
Logged Date: 07/Oct/2014
Location
Land to rear of 26-28 Flambard Avenue
Proposal
Erection of 2 x 3 bed bungalows to the rear
with associated turning facilities and garages
Applicant
Member Referral Date
Mr B Willis
Agent:
2/12/14
Officer:
Ken Parke Planning
Consultants - R
Henderson
Kim Bowditch
Process
DEL
Recommendation
To REFUSE
Latest Update
Public Consultation
17 letters of objection
Consultee Response
Natural England
Transport Development
Management
Rec 20/10/2014 - Objects to this application
proposal unless the applicant contributes to the
mitigation set out in the SPD in accordance with
the levels and procedures for this contribution.
Rec 20/10/2014 - NO OBJECTION, subject to the
following condition(s):
The development hereby permitted shall not be
occupied or utilised until the access, parking and
turning indicated on the submitted details has been
constructed. Thereafter, these areas shall be
maintained, kept free from obstruction and
available for the purposes specified.
Before any other operations are commenced the
visibility splay areas as shown on Drawing Number
J.45.2014.02 shall be cleared/excavated to a level
not exceeding 0.6 metres above the relative level
of the adjacent carriageway. The splay areas shall
thereafter shall be maintained and kept free from
all obstructions.
Reason: In the interests of road safety.
weeklywardlistrpt
Page 21
Page 22
Date 02/12/2014
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
WARD:
Jumpers
Target Date:
8/14/0080 Outl
28/04/2014
Logged Date: 17/Mar/2014
Location
41 The Grove
Proposal
Outline application for the erection of 4 semidetached dwellings (Matters for consideration
are access, layout and scale)
Member Referral Date
Applicant
Mr J Lammering
Agent:
08/04/2014
Officer:
Willams Lester - N
Ham
Kim Bowditch
Process
COM
Recommendation
To REFUSE
Latest Update
•Ask applicant to withdraw & re-submit
Public Consultation
1 other letter
Consultee Response
Natural England
Rec 31/03/2014 - We have tried to access this
proposal through the Council‟s website, but the
relevant information is not available for us to view.
Without access to sufficient information, we are
unable to provide the authority with advice on this
proposal.
We shall attempt to access this proposal through
the Council‟s website in seven days time. If
information is then available for us to view, we will
consider the proposal and provide advice to the
authority within 21 days as usual. If information
becomes available before seven days and the
authority wish us to commence the 21 day
consultation period sooner, then please inform us
as soon as the information becomes available.
Rec 03/04/2014 - Objects to this application
proposal unless the applicant contributes to the
mitigation set out in the SPD in accordance with
the levels and procedures for this contribution.
This advice on mitigation also applies in meeting
legislative and policy considerations on the
protection, conservation and enhancement of the
heathland SSSIs and Ramsar site.
Issues concerning other designated sites - No
objection- no conditions requested
The application site lies in close proximity to Avon
Valley (Bickton to Christchurch) Site of Special
Scientific Interest (SSSI). This is part of the Avon
Valley Special Protection Area (SPA) which is also
a wetland of international importance under the
Ramsar Convention (Ramsar site). Natural
England is satisfied that the proposed
development being carried out in strict accordance
weeklywardlistrpt
Page 22
Page 23
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
WARD:
Date 02/12/2014
Jumpers
Transport Development
Management
Count of applications:
weeklywardlistrpt
with the details of the application, as submitted, will
not damage or destroy the interest features for
which these sites have been notified. We therefore
advise your authority that this SSSI does not
represent a constraint in determining this
application. Should the details of this application
change, Natural England draws your attention to
Section 28(I) of the Wildlife and Countryside Act
1981 (as amended), requiring your authority to reconsult Natural England.
Rec 20/04/2014 - No objection
3
Page 23
Page 24
Date 02/12/2014
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
WARD:
8/14/0410 Full
Mudeford & Friars Cliff
Target Date:
09/12/2014
Logged Date: 22/Oct/2014
Location
21 Bure Lane
Applicant
Proposal
First floor extension to enlarge bedroom 2,
form dressing room and ensuite and enlarge
master bedroom
Member Referral Date
Agent:
Mr P Hayward
2/12/14
Officer:
Tim Furmidge
Process
Mills Barry J
DEL
Recommendation
To GRANT
Latest Update
Public Consultation
1 letter of objection
Consultee Response
Target Date:
8/14/0469 Full
08/12/2014
Logged Date: 21/Oct/2014
Location
24 Seaway Avenue
Proposal
Erection of 2 storey extension to rear
Applicant
Member Referral Date
Mr & Mrs Gunning
Agent:
2/12/14
Officer:
Foxwood Designs
Richard Castro-Parker
Process
DEL
Recommendation
To GRANT
Latest Update
Public Consultation
None to date.
Consultee Response
weeklywardlistrpt
Page 24
Page 25
Date 02/12/2014
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
WARD:
8/14/0514 Full
Mudeford & Friars Cliff
Target Date:
08/12/2014
Logged Date: 20/Oct/2014
Location
1 Medina Way
Applicant
Proposal
Erection of first floor side extension (Revised
scheme following refusal of 8/13/0590)
Member Referral Date
Mr & Mrs M Eagling
Agent:
2/12/14
Officer:
Jo Cleaves
Process
WB Planning
DEL
Recommendation
To REFUSE
Latest Update
Public Consultation
13 letters of objection
Petition for the proposal, with 36 signatures
Petition against the proposal, with 48 signatures
Consultee Response
Target Date:
8/14/0494 CondR
01/12/2014
Logged Date: 10/Oct/2014
Location
116 Mudeford (Mudeford Quay Conservation
Area)
Proposal
Variation of Condition 7 of Application
8/13/0371 to allow the bedroom windows on
North, East and West elevations to be clear
glazed
Applicant
Member Referral Date
Mr L Davis
Agent:
4/11/14
Officer:
Kim Bowditch
Process
DEL
Recommendation
To REFUSE
Latest Update
Public Consultation
4 letters of objection 1 other letter
Consultee Response
weeklywardlistrpt
Page 25
Page 26
Date 02/12/2014
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
WARD:
8/14/0462 Full
Mudeford & Friars Cliff
Target Date:
10/11/2014
Logged Date: 24/Sep/2014
Location
4 Rook Hill Road
Proposal
Erection of detached 4 bed dwelling following
demolition of existing (amended scheme
following approval of 8/14/0189)
Applicant
Member Referral Date
Mr K Dearsley
Agent:
4/11/14
David SmithArchitect
Officer:
Kim Bowditch
Process
DEL
Recommendation
To REFUSE
Latest Update
Public Consultation
1 letter of objection
Consultee Response
Natural England
Transport Development
Management
weeklywardlistrpt
Rec 03/10/2014 - Natural England has previously
commented on this proposal and made comments
to the authority in our letter dated 12th May 2014
(Your ref: 8/14/0189, Our ref: 120576).
The advice provided in our previous response
applies equally to this amendment although we
made no objection to the original proposal.
Should the proposal be amended in a way which
significantly affects its impact on the natural
environment then, in accordance with Section 4 of
the Natural Environment and Rural Communities
Act 2006, Natural England should be consulted
again.
Rec 20/10/2014 - No objevtion to this proposal.
Page 26
Page 27
Date 02/12/2014
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
WARD:
8/14/0461 Outl
Mudeford & Friars Cliff
Target Date:
12/12/2014
Logged Date: 23/Sep/2014
Location
MCA Training Centre Penny Way
Proposal
Outline application for the erection of up to 26
dwellings (revised scheme following refusal
of 8/13/0443)
Applicant
Member Referral Date
Maritime & Coastguard
Agency
Agent:
14/10/2014
WYG
Officer:
Kim Bowditch
Process
COM
Recommendation
To
Latest Update
Public Consultation
45 letters of objection 5 other letters
Consultee Response
Wessex Water
Natural England
Transport Development
Management
weeklywardlistrpt
Rec 07/10/2014 - There is adequate capacity in the
local public foul network to accommodate
predicted foul flows only from the proposed
development; point of connection subject to
application and agreement. There must be no
surface water connections to the public foul sewer
network.
The applicant‟s consultants have been in contact
with Wessex Water to discuss the surface water
drainage from the site and it has been agreed in
principle that an attenuated discharge rate of 20 l/s
maximum can be accepted into the public surface
water sewer which discharges to sea. This
proposal will also require the acceptance of your
Authority and the Environment Agency.
Rec 14/10/2014 - objects to this application
proposal unless the applicant contributes to the
mitigation set out in the SPD in accordance with
the levels and procedures for this contribution.
This advice on mitigation also applies in meeting
legislative and policy considerations on the
protection, conservation and enhancement of the
heathland SSSIs and Ramsar site.
Rec 17/10/2014 - Whilst there are still some
concerns with regard to possible improvement
works on Penny Way between the car park access
and the site the County Highway Authority has NO
OBJECTION to the proposal in principle subject to
suitable mitigation and revised layout being agreed
as part of the deferred matters application should it
follow.
Page 27
Page 28
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
Date 02/12/2014
WARD:
Mudeford & Friars Cliff
Environment Agency
Rec 10/10/2014 - We have no objection to the
proposed development subject to the following
conditions and informative being included in any
planning permission granted.
Flood Risk
We have reviewed the submitted Flood Risk
Assessment (FRA) prepared by Parsons
Brinkerhoff dated Version 1.0 dated September
2013.
Whilst we have no objection to the principle of the
development proposals we note that there is a
possible overland flood source from the east, of
which no assessment has been made within the
FRA. Further, there is no evidence within the FRA
that the Shoreline Management Plan status for this
stretch of coastline has been considered. Please
consult with your Authority‟s Drainage Engineers to
consider these matters. They may require an
updated FRA in this regard prior to planning
approval.
We note the outline proposals for the surface water
management and in general we find them
acceptable. The detailed design of the scheme will
need to be assessed but this can be dealt with
under the planning condition and should accord
with the design advice below:
CONDITION:
No development shall commence until a surface
water management scheme for the site, based on
sustainable drainage principles and an assessment
of the hydrological and hydrogeological context of
the development, has been submitted to and
approved in writing by the local planning authority.
The submitted details shall clarify the intended
future ownership and maintenance provision for all
drainage works serving the site. The scheme shall
subsequently be implemented in accordance with
the approved details before the development is
completed.
REASON:
To prevent the increased risk of flooding and
ensure future maintenance of the surface water
drainage system.
There must be no interruption to the existing
surface water and/or land drainage arrangements
of the surrounding land as a result of the
operations on the site. Provisions must be made to
weeklywardlistrpt
Page 28
Page 29
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
WARD:
Date 02/12/2014
Mudeford & Friars Cliff
ensure that all existing drainage systems continue
to operate effectively and that flood risk to the
surrounding area is not increased as a result of the
development.
Contaminated Land
We have reviewed the Phase 1 Land Quality
Assessment, MCA Training Centre, Steamer Point,
Christchurch Maritime and Coastguard Agency
May 2012 (ref. 92767BV-BBR) by Parsons
Brinckerhoff and the Interpretative Site
Investigation Report (March 2013) by Parsons
Brinckerhoff. Due to limited intrusive work carried
out to date (with respect to the risk to controlled
waters) to delineate the level of potential
contamination as outlined in the Phase 1 Report,
we would recommend inclusion of the following
conditions:
CONDITION
No development approved by this planning
permission shall take place until a remediation
strategy that includes the following components to
deal with the risks associated with contamination
of the site shall each be submitted to and
approved, in writing, by the local planning authority:
1. A preliminary risk assessment which has
identified:
- all previous uses
- potential contaminants associated with those uses
- a conceptual model of the site indicating sources,
pathways and receptors
- potentially unacceptable risks arising from
contamination at the site.
2. A site investigation scheme, based on (1) to
provide information for a detailed assessment of
the risk to all receptors that may be affected,
including those off site.
3. The results of the site investigation and the
detailed risk assessment referred to in (2) and,
based on these, an options appraisal and
remediation strategy giving full details of the
remediation measures required and how they are
to be undertaken.
4. A verification plan providing details of the data
that will be collected in order to demonstrate that
the works set out in the remediation strategy in (3)
are complete and identifying any requirements for
longer-term monitoring of pollutant linkages,
maintenance and arrangements for contingency
action.
Any changes to these components require the
express written consent of the local planning
weeklywardlistrpt
Page 29
Page 30
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
WARD:
Date 02/12/2014
Mudeford & Friars Cliff
authority. The scheme shall be implemented as
approved.
REASON
To protect controlled waters.
CONDITION
If, during development, contamination not
previously identified is found to be present at the
site then no further development (unless otherwise
agreed in writing with the local planning authority)
shall be carried out until the developer has
submitted a remediation strategy to the local
planning authority detailing how this unsuspected
contamination shall be dealt with and obtained
written approval from the local planning authority.
The remediation strategy shall be implemented as
approved.
REASON
To protect controlled waters.
weeklywardlistrpt
Page 30
Page 31
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
Date 02/12/2014
WARD:
Mudeford & Friars Cliff
Planning Policy Team Leader CBC Rec 16/10/2014 - The main policy issues to be
considered on this site are the principle of
residential development on the site, the loss of the
training centre, impacts on designated open space
and affordable housing provision.
Policy ENV9 relates to the detailed design and
layout of the proposals, and is therefore best
considered by the Case Officer based on
consideration of detailed plans and a site visit. This
policy comment does not therefore consider Policy
ENV9.
In terms of existing open space designations, the
site is already fenced off from the Steamer Point
woodland, and the accesses to this area are
separate from the MCA site. Development of the
site does not appear to compromise this, and
therefore no policy issues arise from the
application in respect of open space.
Although this site does not fall within a B1, B2 or
B8 use class it was considered as part of Stage 1
of the Christchurch and East Dorset Employment
Land Review (2007). The assessment of the site
concluded that the site did not score highly in
terms of its potential significance to employment
generation, and that its location might also mean
that securing alternative employment uses on the
site may not be desirable. The site‟s very
prominent coastal location, and its proximity to and
access through residential areas, mean that, in
practice, the potential for employment re-use or
redevelopment will be very limited.
In conclusion, there is no compelling case to
protect this training centre use on the site, and the
principle of residential redevelopment is therefore
supported in policy terms.
The proposed application is liable to make
contributions towards heathland mitigation in
accordance with the South East Dorset Heathland
SPD and the South East Dorset Transport
Contributions Scheme 2.
Policy LN3 of the Core Strategy sets out a
presumption that affordable housing will be
provided onsite for sites resulting in a net increase
of 15 or more dwellings
weeklywardlistrpt
Page 31
Page 32
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
Date 02/12/2014
WARD:
Mudeford & Friars Cliff
Coast Protection Officer CBC
Rec 16/10/2014 - Having carefully read the
consultants Cliff/Slope Stability Assessment I am
satisfied the proposed development will have no
adverse effect on the stability of the existing
cliff/slope or coast protection assets below it.
weeklywardlistrpt
Page 32
Page 33
Date 02/12/2014
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
WARD:
8/14/0415 Full
Mudeford & Friars Cliff
Target Date:
11/11/2014
Logged Date: 22/Sep/2014
Location
Little Haven Mudeford Quay (Within Mudeford
Quay Conservation Area)
Proposal
Erection of attached 3 bed dwelling with new
access following demolition of existing
property (revised scheme following refusal at
appeal of 8/12/0194 and 8/12/0195)
Member Referral Date
Applicant
Mr A Griffiths
Agent:
14/10/2014
Officer:
Ken Parke Planning
Consultants - G
Wright
Kevin Chilvers
Process
DEL
Recommendation
To
Latest Update
To be considered by next Architects Panel
Amended plans required
Public Consultation
51 letters of objection 2 other letters
Consultee Response
Natural England
Rec 13/10/2014 - No objection – with conditions
This application is immediately adjacent to
Christchurch Harbour Site of Special Scientific
Interest (SSSI). However, given the nature and
scale of this proposal, Natural England is satisfied
that there is not likely to be an adverse effect on
this site as a result of the proposal being carried
out in strict accordance with the details of the
application as submitted. We therefore advise your
authority that this SSSI does not represent a
constraint in determining this application. Should
the details of this application change, Natural
England draws your attention to Section 28(I) of
the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 (as
amended), requiring your authority to re-consult
Natural England.
This is based on our understanding that the
application does not include any of the following
elements:
or encroachment of development onto the
foreshore; or
structures; or
Christchurch Harbour SSSI
Conditions
machinery to reduce unnecessary noise;
weeklywardlistrpt
Page 33
Page 34
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
WARD:
Date 02/12/2014
Mudeford & Friars Cliff
machinery (i.e. plant resulting in a noise level in
Page 2 of 3 excess of 69dbAmax – measured at
the sensitive receptor) to be undertaken during the
bird overwintering period (i.e. October to March
inclusive). Heavy machinery constitutes, for
example, use of pneumatic drills, diggers, dumper
trucks and lorries. Note: The sensitive receptor is
the nearest point of the SSSI or any SSSI
supporting habitat (e.g. high tide roosting site);
stored or disposed of within the SSSI during or
after construction;
provided with a map that clearly shows the
boundaries of the Christchurch Harbour SSSI in
relation to the development site.
These conditions are required to ensure that the
development, as submitted, will not impact upon
the features of special interest for which the SSSI
is notified.
weeklywardlistrpt
Page 34
Page 35
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
Date 02/12/2014
WARD:
Mudeford & Friars Cliff
Transport Development
Rec 10/10/2014 - No objection to the proposed
Management
development subject to the following informatives
and advice being included in any planning
permission granted.
Flood Defence Consent
INFORMATIVE
Under the terms of the Water Resources Act 1991
and the Land Drainage Byelaws, the prior written
consent of the Agency is required for any proposed
works or structures in, under, over or within 8
metres of the top of the bank of the Christchurch
Harbour , designated a 'main river'. The need for
Flood Defence Consent is over and above the
need for planning permission. To discuss the
scope of our controls and to obtain an application
form please contact Yvonne Wiacel .
Pollution Prevention During Construction
INFORMATIVE
Safeguards should be implemented during the
construction phase to minimise the risks of
pollution from the development. Such safeguards
should cover:
- the use of plant and machinery
- oils/chemicals and materials
- the use and routing of heavy plant and vehicles
- the location and form of work and storage areas
and compounds
- the control and removal of spoil and wastes.
The applicant should refer to the Environment
Agency's Pollution Prevention Guidelines at:
https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/pollution
-prevention-guidance-ppg
Flood Risk
We recommend that all flood protection measures
are incorporate in the design of the scheme given
the nature of the location. We would recommend
that finished flor levels are raised above existing.
RECOMMENDATION:
The Council‟s Emergency Planners should be
consulted in relation to flood emergency response
and evacuation arrangements for the site. We
strongly recommend that the applicant prepares a
Flood Warning and Evacuation Plan for future
occupants. The Local Planning Authority may wish
to secure this through an appropriate condition.
We can confirm that the site does lie within a
Flood Warning area.
Rec 17/10/2014 - No objection
weeklywardlistrpt
Page 35
Page 36
Date 02/12/2014
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
WARD:
Mudeford & Friars Cliff
English Heritage
Rec 14/10/2014 - Our specialist staff have
considered the information received and we do not
wish to offer any comments on this occasion.
Recommendation
The application(s) should be determined in
accordance with national and local policy
guidance, and on the basis of your specialist
conservation advice.
Target Date:
8/14/0401 Full
03/11/2014
Logged Date: 10/Sep/2014
Location
125 Mudeford (Grade II Listed Building)
Proposal
Formation of detached double garage to
replace existing
Member Referral Date
Applicant
Mrs S Kriskinans
Agent:
7/10/14
Officer:
Aspire Architects
LLP - M Stevens
Alison Underwood
Process
DEL
Recommendation
To
Latest Update
Tree report likely to be required
Public Consultation
1 letter of support
Consultee Response
weeklywardlistrpt
Page 36
Page 37
Date 02/12/2014
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
WARD:
8/14/0320 Outl
Mudeford & Friars Cliff
Target Date:
19/08/2014
Logged Date: 24/Jun/2014
Location
10 Friars Road
Proposal
Outline application to sever the land and erect
a dwelling (matters for consideration are
access, layout and scale)
Member Referral Date
Applicant
Mrs M Parsa
Agent:
15/7/14
WB Planning
Officer:
Tim Furmidge
Process
DEL
Recommendation
To GRANT
Latest Update
awaiting UU information
Date extended
Public Consultation
5 letters of objection
Consultee Response
Transport Development
Management
Count of applications:
weeklywardlistrpt
Rec 15/07/2014 - NO OBJECTION, subject to the
following condition(s):
The development hereby permitted shall not be
occupied or utilised until the parking indicated on
the
submitted details has been constructed.
Thereafter, these areas shall be maintained, kept
free from
obstruction and available for the purposes
specified.
Before the development is commenced the first 5
metres of the access crossing, measured from the
nearside edge of the carriageway, shall be laid out
and constructed to a specification submitted to and
approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority.
Reason: In the interests of road safety.
9
Page 37
Page 38
Date 02/12/2014
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
WARD:
8/14/0475 Full
North Highcliffe & Walkford
Target Date:
16/01/2015
Logged Date: 01/Dec/2014
Location
56 Plantation Drive
Applicant
Proposal
Conversion of existing flat roof to terraced
area to include 1.8m privacy screens
Member Referral Date
Agent:
Mr C Soares
23/12/2014
Officer:
Aspire Architects
LLP - M Stevens
Melanie Smith
Process
DEL
Recommendation
To
Latest Update
Public Consultation
None to date.
Consultee Response
Target Date:
8/14/0573 Full
12/01/2015
Location
44 Hinton Wood Avenue
Proposal
Erection of a carport
Logged Date: 28/Nov/2014
Applicant
Member Referral Date
Mr & Mrs P Jackson
Agent:
23/12/2014
Officer:
Foxwood Designs
Melanie Smith
Process
DEL
Recommendation
To
Latest Update
Public Consultation
None to date.
Consultee Response
weeklywardlistrpt
Page 38
Page 39
Date 02/12/2014
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
WARD:
North Highcliffe & Walkford
Target Date:
8/14/0561 CLOPD
03/01/2015
Logged Date: 21/Nov/2014
Location
73 Plantation Drive
Applicant
Proposal
Certificate of Lawfulness for the erection of a
single storey rear extension
Member Referral Date
Ms K Hicks
Agent:
16/12/14
Officer:
John Lewis and
Associates - Mr J
Lewis
Alison Underwood
Process
DEL
Recommendation
To
Latest Update
Public Consultation
None to date.
Consultee Response
Target Date:
8/14/0500 Full
22/12/2014
Logged Date: 17/Nov/2014
Location
Land adj 16 Walkford Road
Proposal
Part retrospective application to replace the
existing store with a new build 2 bed
bungalow
Applicant
Member Referral Date
Mr M Bennett
Agent:
09/11/2014
Officer:
Richard Castro-Parker
Process
DEL
Recommendation
To
Latest Update
Public Consultation
1 other letter
Consultee Response
weeklywardlistrpt
Page 39
Page 40
Date 02/12/2014
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
WARD:
8/14/0482 Full
North Highcliffe & Walkford
Target Date:
05/01/2015
Logged Date: 11/Nov/2014
Location
7 Amberwood Gardens
Proposal
Conversion and extension to existing roof to
include front and rear dormers. Single storey
side extension incorporating internal and
external modifications
Applicant
Member Referral Date
Mr & Mrs M Bull
Agent:
9/12/14
Officer:
DUA Architecture
LLP Mr Martin
Hammond
Richard Castro-Parker
Process
DEL
Recommendation
To REFUSE
Latest Update
Public Consultation
3 letters of objection
Consultee Response
weeklywardlistrpt
Page 40
Page 41
Date 02/12/2014
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
WARD:
8/14/0446 Full
North Highcliffe & Walkford
Target Date:
11/11/2014
Logged Date: 18/Sep/2014
Location
Land rear of 53 - 55 Glenville Road
Proposal
Erection of 2 x 3 bed semi-detached dwellings
with associated parking and access from
Tresillian Way (revised scheme following
withdrawal of 8/14/0096)
Member Referral Date
Applicant
Landmark Estates (GBR) Ltd
Agent:
14/10/2014
Pure Town
Planning - Matt
Annen
Officer:
Kevin Chilvers
Process
DEL
Recommendation
To GRANT
Latest Update
Subject to comments from Highway Authority and a UU. To next Architects Panel for a view.
Public Consultation
1 letter of objection
Consultee Response
Natural England
weeklywardlistrpt
Rec 02/10/2014 - Natural England objects to this
application proposal unless the applicant
contributes to the mitigation set out in the SPD in
accordance with the levels and procedures for this
contribution.
This advice on mitigation also applies in meeting
legislative and policy considerations on the
protection, conservation and enhancement of the
heathland SSSIs and Ramsar site.
Page 41
Page 42
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
Date 02/12/2014
WARD:
North Highcliffe & Walkford
Transport Development
Rec 22/10/2014 - The County Highway Authority
Management
has no objection in principle subject to an
acceptable amended plan being submitted
showing the following revisions upon receipt of
which final observations will be provided:
A revised plan is required showing the extent of the
highway particularly between the rear of the
property and the private access as part of the front
garden, drive (and possibly the building) appears to
be shown on this area which is not permissible.
This part of the drive would need to be constructed
as vehicle crossing as it will lie in the highway.
(See s184 informative below).
The applicant should be made aware that whilst
the sites redline boundary abuts the highway this
will only facilitate pedestrian access as it doesn‟t
contain the first part of the private access from the
back edge of the footway of the highway. This
could be an issue for the applicant if they don't
have a right of access; though this is a private
matter. A PDF plan of the highway has been
provided separately to the Planning Case Officer
and can also be obtained from Dorset Highways
Information.
Planning Policy Team Leader CBC
weeklywardlistrpt
Informative: The applicant is advised that
notwithstanding this consent, Section 184 of the
Highways Act 1980 requires the proper
construction of vehicle crossings over kerbed
footways, verges or other highway land. Before
commencement of any works on the public
highway, Dorset County Council‟s Dorset Highways
should be consulted to agree on the detailed
specification.
Rec 08/10/2014 - I have looked at the site of land
to the rear of 53 – 55 Glenville Road which has a
brook running to the western edge of the site. I
understand from the Environment Agency flood
mapping that the site is affected by flood zone 2 as
a result of proximity to the brook. If the proposed
development is located outside of the flood zone I
would consider that the proposal meets the tests of
the NPPF and the sequential approach in locating
development in the lowest area of floodrisk. I
understand that the development red line boundary
is now located in flood zone 1 which would accord
with the sequential approach and the availability of
sites in flood zone 1.
Page 42
Page 43
Date 02/12/2014
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
WARD:
8/14/0157 RM
North Highcliffe & Walkford
Target Date:
29/04/2014
Logged Date: 08/Apr/2014
Location
16 Walkford Road
Proposal
Reserved matters appliction (to consider
landscaping) following grant of 8/13/0246 to
sever the curtilage and convert and extend
the existing garage to from two bedroom
dwelling. The construction of a replacement
storage building to serve Public House
Member Referral Date
Applicant
Mr M Bennett
6/5/14
Agent:
Officer:
Jo Cleaves
Process
DEL
Recommendation
To GRANT
Latest Update
Awaiting amended plans and additional info re trees.
Public Consultation
None to date.
Consultee Response
Count of applications:
weeklywardlistrpt
7
Page 43
Page 44
Date 02/12/2014
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
WARD:
Portfield
Target Date:
8/14/0553 Full
09/01/2015
Logged Date: 27/Nov/2014
Location
16 Beaulieu Road
Applicant
Proposal
Erection of 4 bed dwelling with integral
garage following demolition of the existing
property
Member Referral Date
Agent:
Mr T Robinson
23/12/2014
Officer:
Alison Underwood
Process
Anders Roberts
Cheer - S Taylor
DEL
Recommendation
To
Latest Update
Public Consultation
None to date.
Consultee Response
Target Date:
8/14/0549 Ad
29/12/2014
Logged Date: 17/Nov/2014
Location
Pizza Hut (UK) Ltd Barrack Retail Park
Proposal
Installation of 3x illuminated rail mounted
'sky' letters, 1x illuminated 'Pizza Hut' sign, 4x
illuminated red tube lights around roof edge,
1x wall mounted illuminated 'takeaway' sign,
1x illuminated faux neon 'hat' sign, 1x
illuminated menu sign and 1x illuminated
high pole sign
Applicant
Member Referral Date
Pizza Hut (UK) Ltd
Agent:
09/12/2014
Officer:
Pegasus Group - C
Rands
Melanie Smith
Process
DEL
Recommendation
To
Latest Update
Public Consultation
1 letter of objection
Consultee Response
Transport Development
Management
weeklywardlistrpt
Rec 28/11/2014 - No objection to the proposal.
Page 44
Page 45
Date 02/12/2014
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
WARD:
Portfield
Target Date:
8/14/0540 Full
26/01/2015
Logged Date: 06/Nov/2014
Location
Christchurch Hospital, Fairmile Road (Within
Christchurch Hospital Conservation Area)
Proposal
Demolition of the existing 'Wendy House' and
provision of 35 senior living apartments with
basement car parking, replacement tree
planting, landscape treatment, band stand
and associated infrastructure (Application
submitted to revise previously approved
senior living apartments 8/13/0028)
Applicant
Member Referral Date
Royal Bournemouth &
Christchurch Hospital NHS
Foundation Trust
Agent:
02/12/2014
Officer:
Quantum Group Graham Parkes
Kim Bowditch
Process
DEL
Recommendation
To
Latest Update
Public Consultation
4 letters of support
Consultee Response
English Heritage
Wessex Water
weeklywardlistrpt
Rec26/11/2014 - Our specialist staff have
considered the information received and we do not
wish to offer any comments on this occasion.
Rec 01/12/2014 - The Foul
and Surface Water Drainage Statement
(September 2012) accompanying the application is
in general
accordance with these discussions. The Strategy is
developed to ensure foul drainage does not exceed
existing flows, surface and foul water flows will be
separate with surface water draining via SUDs
Arrangements.
The applicant is reminded that there must be no
tree planting within 3 metres of sewers in
accordance with
the current version of Sewers for Adoption
Page 45
Page 46
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
Date 02/12/2014
WARD:
Portfield
Natural England
Rec 14/11/2014 - It appears to Natural England
that the consultation above is not materially
different from a previous application 8/13/0028 in
respect of the 35 senior living apartments. Natural
England therefore advise that our comments
regarding that application, should be applied to this
application.
"In respect of 35 senior living apartments, objection
pending mitigation contribution The application site
lies in the vicinity (within 5 km and beyond 400m)
of heathlands that are notified as SSSIs for the
special interest of their heathland habitats and
associated plant and animal species. The SSSIs
are part of the Dorset Heathlands Special
Protection Area (SPA) on account of rare or
vulnerable heathland bird species and are also part
of a Ramsar site on account of rare or vulnerable
heathland wetlands and associated rare wetland
species. They are additionally part of the Dorset
Heaths Special Area of Conservation (SAC) on
account of rare or vulnerable heathland and
associated habitats and some individual species.
The proximity of the European sites (SPA and
SAC) raises considerations on the requirements of
the Habitats Directive 1992 for these sites to be
maintained or, where necessary, restored at a
favourable conservation status (Article 3 (1)).
Determination of the application should be
undertaken with regard to the requirements of the
Habitat and Species Regulations 20121, in
particular Regulations 61 and 62; and legislative
and policy considerations on the protection,
conservation and enhancement of the interest
features of the SSSI and Ramsar site.
There is considerable documented information
showing that urban development in the area
around lowland heathland has an adverse effect on
the quality of heathland interest features underlying
the designation of the European sites, Ramsar site
and SSSIs. Key references can be found at
http://www.naturalengland.org.uk/regions/south_we
st/ourwork/heathlands/default.aspx
In our view the proposal is not directly connected
with, or necessary to, the management of the
European sites. Owing to the proximity of the
proposal to the European sites, Natural England is
of the opinion that the additional residential
development, in combination with other dwellings
proposed near to the European sites, would be
likely to have a significant effect on the heathland
interest features of these sites in the context of
Regulation 61. Before granting planning
weeklywardlistrpt
Page 46
Page 47
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
WARD:
Date 02/12/2014
Portfield
permission the competent authority should
undertake an appropriate assessment of the
implications of the development on the European
sites in light of their conservation objectives. The
conservation objectives are to maintain and, where
not in favourable condition, to restore, the
heathland and other habitat and species interest
features.
Whilst on its own the development may not
adversely affect the integrity of the European sites,
in combination with other dwellings proposed near
to the European sites, the development without
mitigation would be likely to contribute to a
deterioration of the quality of lowland heathland
and its interest features.
Natural England notes the applicant‟s commitment
to make an appropriate developer contribution
towards the Dorset Heathlands Supplementary
Planning Document (DH SPD), as a means to
addressing an adverse effect on the integrity of the
European site. The appellant will need to
contribute towards this through a unilateral
undertaking. It would be possible to mitigate the
effects through the types of measures set out in
the Dorset Heathlands SPD. The measures will be
subject to monitoring and evaluation, and
modification where necessary to ensure that as a
whole they deliver effective mitigation across the
European sites. On this basis Natural England
considers that implementation of the SPD can
allow the Competent Authorities in South East
Dorset to conclude no adverse effect on the
integrity of the European sites from the envisaged
amount of housing development in the area
between 400m and 5km from these sites in the
period to the end of 20142.
Natural England objects to this application
proposal unless the applicant contributes to the
mitigation set out in the SPD in accordance with
the levels and procedures for this contribution.
This advice on mitigation also applies in meeting
legislative and policy considerations on the
protection, conservation and enhancement of the
heathland SSSIs and Ramsar site."
weeklywardlistrpt
Page 47
Page 48
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
Date 02/12/2014
WARD:
Portfield
Transport Development
Management
Rec 11/11/14 - The County Highway Authority has
NO OBJECTION, subject to the same condition(s)
previously recommended for planning application
8/13/0028 subject to the following potential issue
being adequately addressed.
It appears that whilst the layout of the access road
to the first part of the site is broadly as previously
proposed; the informal zebra crossing now
appears to be further south in the public highway.
Previous discussions indicated part of the public
highway is to be stopped up and so this should not
be a problem provided the crossing will not be in
the public highway.
It has been previously explained that there are two
routes open to undertake this stopping up. As the
stopping up is to implement a planning application
the Town and Country Planning Act could be used.
For this you will need to apply to the Secretary of
State. Some guidance can be found at the
following location with more advice available by
contacting the National Transport Casework Team.
weeklywardlistrpt
Page 48
Page 49
Date 02/12/2014
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
WARD:
Portfield
Target Date:
8/14/0480 Full
18/12/2014
Logged Date: 29/Oct/2014
Location
Land between 7-11 Beaulieu Road
Proposal
Erection of two x 3 bed semi-detached
dwellings to include 2 parking spaces per
dwelling
Member Referral Date
Applicant
Mr J Duckett
Agent:
9/12/14
Officer:
Simon McCormack
Architecture
Kevin Chilvers
Process
DEL
Recommendation
To GRANT
Latest Update
Grant on receipt of UU and tree comments
Public Consultation
None to date.
Consultee Response
Transport Development
Management
Rec 17/11/2014 - he County Highway Authority has
NO OBJECTION, subject to the following
condition(s):
Before the development is commenced the first 5
metres of the access crossings, measured from
the nearside edge of the carriageway, shall be laid
out and constructed to a specification submitted to
and approved in writing by the Local Planning
Authority.
Reason: In the interests of road safety.
The development hereby permitted shall not be
occupied or utilised until the parking indicated on
the submitted details has been constructed.
Thereafter, these areas shall be maintained, kept
free from obstruction and available for the
purposes specified.
Reason: In the interests of road safety.
Informative: The applicant is advised that
notwithstanding this consent, Section 184 of the
Highways Act 1980 requires the proper
construction of vehicle crossings over kerbed
footways, verges or other highway land. Before
commencement of any works on the public
highway, Dorset County Council‟s Dorset Highways
should be consulted to agree on the detailed
specification. Contact can be made by telephone
to Dorset Direct (01305 221000), by email at
[email protected], or in writing at
Dorset Highways, Dorset County Council, County
weeklywardlistrpt
Page 49
Page 50
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
WARD:
Date 02/12/2014
Portfield
Hall, Dorchester, DT1 1XJ.
weeklywardlistrpt
Page 50
Page 51
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
Date 02/12/2014
WARD:
Portfield
Natural England
weeklywardlistrpt
Rec 13/11/14 - Issues concerning designated
heathland sites
The application site lies in the vicinity (within 5 km
and beyond 400m) of heathlands that are notified
as SSSIs for the special interest of their heathland
habitats and associated plant and animal species.
The SSSIs are part of the Dorset Heathlands
Special Protection Area (SPA) on account of rare
or vulnerable heathland bird species and are also
part of a Ramsar site on account of rare or
vulnerable heathland wetlands and associated rare
wetland species. They are additionally part of the
Dorset Heaths Special Area of Conservation (SAC)
on account of rare or vulnerable heathland and
associated habitats and some individual species.
The proximity of the European sites (SPA and
SAC) raises considerations on the requirements of
the Habitats Directive 1992 for these sites to be
maintained or, where necessary, restored at a
favourable conservation status (Article 3 (1)).
Determination of the application should be
undertaken with regard to the requirements of the
Habitat and Species Regulations 20101, in
particular Regulations 61 and 62; and legislative
and policy considerations on the protection,
conservation and enhancement of the interest
features of the SSSI and Ramsar site.
There is considerable documented information
showing that urban development in the area
around lowland heathland has an adverse effect on
the quality of heathland interest features underlying
the
1 The Conservation of Habitats and Species
(Amendment) Regulations 2012. These regulations
consolidate the Conservation (Natural Habitats, &
c.) Regulations 1994 and their amendments, and
introduce some changes. Regulations 9(5), 61 and
62 referred to in this letter are unchanged from the
previous Regulations.
Page 2 of 3
designation of the European sites, Ramsar site
and SSSIs.
In our view the proposal is not directly connected
with, or necessary to, the management of the
European sites. Owing to the proximity of the
proposal to the European sites, Natural England is
of the opinion that the additional residential
development, in combination with other dwellings
proposed near to the European sites, would be
likely to have a significant effect on the heathland
interest features of these sites in the context of
Regulation 61. Before granting planning
permission the competent authority should
Page 51
Page 52
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
WARD:
Date 02/12/2014
Portfield
undertake an appropriate assessment of the
implications of the development on the European
sites in light of their conservation objectives. The
conservation objectives are to maintain and, where
not in favourable condition, to restore, the
heathland and other habitat and species interest
features.
Whilst on its own the development may not
adversely affect the integrity of the European sites,
in combination with other dwellings proposed near
to the European sites, the development without
mitigation would be likely to contribute to a
deterioration of the quality of lowland heathland
and its interest features.
The application proposal does not include
mitigation that would avoid or reduce an adverse
effect on the integrity of the European sites. It
would be possible to mitigate the effects through
the types of measures set out in the Dorset
Heathlands SPD. The measures will be subject to
monitoring and evaluation, and modification where
necessary to ensure that as a whole they deliver
effective mitigation across the European sites. On
this basis Natural England considers that
implementation of the SPD can allow the
Competent Authorities in South East Dorset to
conclude no adverse effect on the integrity of the
European sites from the envisaged amount of
housing development in the area between 400m
and 5km from these sites in the period to the end
of 20142.
Natural England objects to this application
proposal unless the applicant contributes to the
mitigation set out in the SPD in accordance with
the levels and procedures for this contribution.
This advice on mitigation also applies in meeting
legislative and policy considerations on the
protection, conservation and enhancement of the
heathland SSSIs and Ramsar site.
Issues concerning protected species
We have not assessed the application and
associated documents for impacts on protected
species.
Natural England has published Standing Advice on
protected species. The Standing Advice includes a
habitat decision tree which provides advice to
planners on deciding if there is a „reasonable
likelihood‟ of protected species being present. It
also provides detailed advice on the protected
species most often affected by development,
including flow charts for individual species to
enable an assessment to be made of a protected
species survey and mitigation strategy.
weeklywardlistrpt
Page 52
Page 53
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
WARD:
Date 02/12/2014
Portfield
You should apply our Standing Advice to this
application. If protected species or biodiversity
interests are likely to be affected, or if the
application exceeds 0.1 ha, then in line with the
Dorset Planning Protocol Natural England
recommends that this is achieved by requesting a
Dorset County Council Natural Environment Team
(DCC NET) approved Biodiversity Mitigation Plan
(BMP). A standard format for a BMP is available
on the Dorset For You website:
http://www.dorsetforyou.com/401489. The plan
should include the biodiversity mitigation and
enhancement measures that will be incorporated
into the development. The DCC NET approved
BMP should be received prior to determination,
with any permission subject to a condition for
implementation in full. Please note that provided
the application is supported by a NET approved
BMP then no further consultation with Natural
England is required
2 This advice does not apply to every individual
application. Further considerations for appropriate
assessment can apply to „significant site
applications‟, for example, proposals that are large
in scale or would cause a loss to alternative
greenspace in conflict with aims of the Framework.
Page 3 of 3
As Standing Advice it is a material consideration in
the determination of applications in the same way
as any individual response received from Natural
England following consultation. However, the
Standing Advice should not be treated as giving
any indication or providing any assurance in
respect of European Protected Species (EPS) that
the proposed development is unlikely to affect the
EPS present on the site; nor should it be
interpreted as meaning that Natural England has
reached any views as to whether a licence may be
granted.
If you have any specific questions on aspects that
are not covered by our Standing Advice for
European Protected Species or have difficulty in
applying it to this application please contact us at
[email protected]
For any queries relating to the specific advice in
this letter only please contact Chelsea Hayward on
0300 060 0841. For any new consultations, or to
provide further information on this consultation
please send your correspondences to
[email protected].
weeklywardlistrpt
Page 53
Page 54
Date 02/12/2014
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
WARD:
Portfield
Target Date:
8/14/0506 Full
05/12/2014
Logged Date: 21/Oct/2014
Location
Unit 9 Christchurch Retail Park
Proposal
Increase glazed shop front area to front and
install windows to west elevation
Applicant
Member Referral Date
LondonMetric Saturn Ltd
Agent:
11/11/14
Officer:
Blue Sky Planning
Ltd
Kevin Chilvers
Process
DEL
Recommendation
To GRANT
Latest Update
Public Consultation
None to date.
Consultee Response
weeklywardlistrpt
Page 54
Page 55
Date 02/12/2014
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
WARD:
Portfield
Target Date:
8/14/0491 Full
04/12/2014
Logged Date: 20/Oct/2014
Location
Land at Avon Trading Park
Proposal
Erection of 1x B1 (Office) and B8 (Storage and
Distribution) unit
Applicant
Member Referral Date
Mr J Beauchamp
Agent:
18/11/2014
Benjamin &
Beauchamp
Architects
Officer:
Kim Bowditch
Process
DEL
Recommendation
To GRANT
Latest Update
Public Consultation
None to date.
Consultee Response
Transport Development
Management
Rec 10/11/14 - The County Highway Authority has
NO OBJECTION, subject to the following
condition(s):
The development hereby permitted shall not be
occupied or utilised until the parking and turning
indicated on the submitted details has been
constructed. Thereafter, these areas shall be
maintained, kept free from obstruction and
available for the purposes specified.
Reason: In the interests of road safety.
weeklywardlistrpt
Page 55
Page 56
Date 02/12/2014
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
WARD:
Portfield
Target Date:
8/14/0444 Full
06/11/2014
Logged Date: 17/Sep/2014
Location
164-174 Barrack Road (A&G Hand Car Wash)
Proposal
Erect canopy over rear car washing area and
new boundary fence (AMENDED
DESCRIPTION)
Member Referral Date
Applicant
Mr Yanni
Agent:
25/11/14
Officer:
Flaxton Engineering
Ltd Mr Steve Ansell
Tim Furmidge
Process
DEL
Recommendation
To GRANT
Latest Update
Reconsult on amended plans
Public Consultation
1 letter of objection
Consultee Response
weeklywardlistrpt
Page 56
Page 57
Date 02/12/2014
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
WARD:
Portfield
Target Date:
8/14/0392 Full
10/10/2014
Logged Date: 20/Aug/2014
Location
80 Clarendon Road
Proposal
Erection of detached bungalow to rear with
associated parking and access
Member Referral Date
Applicant
Mrs A Heather O'Brien
Agent:
30/09/14
Anders Roberts
Cheer Ltd
Officer:
Kim Bowditch
Process
DEL
Recommendation
To GRANT
Latest Update
Awaiting confirmation of UU
Public Consultation
None to date.
Consultee Response
Transport Development
Management
Rec 02/09/2014 - NO OBJECTION, subject to the
following condition(s):
The development hereby permitted shall not be
occupied or utilised until the parking and turning
indicated on the submitted details has been
constructed. Thereafter, these areas shall be
maintained, kept free from obstruction and
available for the purposes specified.
Reason: In the interests of road safety.
Informative: The applicant is advised that
notwithstanding this consent, Section 184 of the
Highways Act 1980 requires the proper
construction of vehicle crossings over kerbed
footways, verges or other highway land. Before
commencement of any works on the public
highway, Dorset County Council‟s Dorset Highways
should be consulted to agree on the detailed
specification.
weeklywardlistrpt
Page 57
Page 58
Date 02/12/2014
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
WARD:
Portfield
8/14/0329 CLOPD
Target Date:
10/09/2014
Logged Date: 18/Jul/2014
Location
5 Hanover Close (Hanover House UK Ltd)
Proposal
Certificate of Lawfulness for a change of use
from B8 to B1
Applicant
Member Referral Date
Ms L Mail
Agent:
07/10/2014
Officer:
Jo Cleaves
Process
DEL
Recommendation
To LAWFUL
Latest Update
Public Consultation
None to date.
Consultee Response
Count of applications:
weeklywardlistrpt
9
Page 58
Page 59
Date 02/12/2014
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
WARD:
8/14/0566 Full
Purewell & Stanpit
Target Date:
15/01/2015
Logged Date: 28/Nov/2014
Location
6 Ledbury Road (Adj to Stanpit and
Fishermans Bank Conservation Area)
Proposal
Erection of single storey rear extension
Applicant
Member Referral Date
Mr A Griffiths
Agent:
23/12/14
Officer:
Diana Mezzogori-Curran
Process
DJM Design
DEL
Recommendation
To
Latest Update
Public Consultation
None to date.
Consultee Response
Target Date:
8/14/0551 Full
08/01/2015
Logged Date: 26/Nov/2014
Location
8 Pauntley Road
Proposal
Roof alterations to include raising the ridge
height and forming gable ends to front and
rear. Erection of single storey extension to
rear with pitched roof and gable end
Applicant
Member Referral Date
Mr S Giltrap
Agent:
23/12/2014
Officer:
Ecclestone Design
Richard Castro-Parker
Process
DEL
Recommendation
To
Latest Update
Public Consultation
None to date.
Consultee Response
weeklywardlistrpt
Page 59
Page 60
Date 02/12/2014
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
WARD:
Purewell & Stanpit
Target Date:
8/14/0569 CLOPD
08/01/2015
Logged Date: 21/Nov/2014
Location
2 Haven Close
Applicant
Proposal
Certificate of Lawfulness for the part
conversion of the garage to habitable
accommodation
Member Referral Date
Mr & Mrs Forrest
Agent:
16/12/14
Officer:
Foxwood Designs
Alison Underwood
Process
DEL
Recommendation
To
Latest Update
Public Consultation
None to date.
Consultee Response
Target Date:
8/14/0538 Full
18/12/2014
Logged Date: 05/Nov/2014
Location
52 Minterne Road
Proposal
Erection of rear and side extension, re-model
internal layout to include new roof and loft
conversion
Applicant
Member Referral Date
Mr C Irwin
Agent:
2/12/14
Officer:
Coast & Country
Architecture - D Crain
Melanie Smith
Process
DEL
Recommendation
To
Latest Update
Public Consultation
1 letter of objection
Consultee Response
weeklywardlistrpt
Page 60
Page 61
Date 02/12/2014
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
WARD:
8/14/0508 Full
Purewell & Stanpit
Target Date:
05/12/2014
Logged Date: 21/Oct/2014
Location
48 Minterne Road
Proposal
Erection of rear extension, gabled roof
extension, dormer and loft conversion
Member Referral Date
Applicant
Mr & Mrs R McCoy
Agent:
2/12/14
Officer:
Foxwood Designs
Melanie Smith
Process
DEL
Recommendation
To GRANT
Latest Update
Planning Application 8/14/0508 is hereby approved, in accordance with the approved drawings stamp
dated received 10/10/14 and FRA stamp dated received 25/11/14, as it is the view of the Council that the
development authorised by this permission satisfies the requirements of saved policy H12 of the
Borough of Christchurch Local Plan (2001) and policies HE2, KS1 and ME6 of the Christchurch and East
Dorset Local Plan (2014). The attached conditions are required in order to ensure the development, once
commenced or constructed, continues to comply with the policies set out above.
In accordance with paragraphs 186 and 187 of the NPPF Christchurch Borough Council (CBC) takes a
positive and proactive approach to development proposals focused on solutions. CBC work with
applicants/agents in a positive and proactive manner by;
•
offering a pre-application advice service, and
•
as appropriate updating applications/agents of any issues that may arise in the processing of their
application and where possible suggesting solutions.
This planning permission does not convey the right to enter land or to carry out works affecting or
crossing the boundary with land, which is not within your control without the landowners consent. This
is, however, a civil matter and this planning consent is granted without prejudice to this.
This permission is granted under Town and Country Planning legislation and does not alter or impinge
upon the rights of adjoining landowners under common law or under the Party Wall Act 1996. If any part
of the development is physically attached to, or relies for support on, the neighbouring property the
consent of the relevant landowners/occupiers will need to be obtained under the provisions of the Party
Wall Act 1996.
Please note that the bat/bird survey submitted is valid for a period of 12 months only. Should works to
the property begin after this period the advice of the author of the report and/or Natural England should
be obtained.
Public Consultation
1 other letter
Consultee Response
Count of applications:
weeklywardlistrpt
5
Page 61
Page 62
Date 02/12/2014
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
WARD:
St Catherine's and Hurn
Target Date:
8/14/0571 CondR
13/01/2015
Logged Date: 28/Nov/2014
Location
27 River Way
Applicant
Proposal
Variation of condition 2 of application
8/13/0212 (allowed by appeal) to allow
amended treatments and to increase the size
of the single storey element to the rear
Member Referral Date
Agent:
Mr Hounsell
23/12/2014
Officer:
Trinity Architecture
Limited - J Frampton
Kevin Chilvers
Process
DEL
Recommendation
To
Latest Update
Public Consultation
None to date.
Consultee Response
Target Date:
8/14/0560 Full
08/01/2015
Logged Date: 27/Nov/2014
Location
16 Bosley Way
Proposal
Enlargement and extension of roofspace for
habitable accommodation with dormers to
front and rear and erection of side and rear
extension (following demolition of existing
garage and conservatory) (Revised scheme
following withdrawal of 8/14/0460)
Applicant
Member Referral Date
Mr & Mrs Vanreenen
Agent:
23/12/14
Officer:
The Design Studio C Morris
Tim Furmidge
Process
DEL
Recommendation
To
Latest Update
Public Consultation
None to date.
Consultee Response
weeklywardlistrpt
Page 62
Page 63
Date 02/12/2014
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
WARD:
8/14/0568 Full
St Catherine's and Hurn
Target Date:
08/01/2015
Logged Date: 24/Nov/2014
Location
114 River Way
Applicant
Proposal
Erection of rear extension following
demolition of garage (revised scheme
following grant of 8/13/0575)
Member Referral Date
Mr & Mrs Taylor
Agent:
16/12/2014
Officer:
Richard Castro-Parker
Process
Rodway
DEL
Recommendation
To
Latest Update
Public Consultation
None to date.
Consultee Response
Target Date:
8/14/0534 Full
30/12/2014
Logged Date: 10/Nov/2014
Location
8 Durlston Crescent
Proposal
Erection of first floor roof extension to rear
Applicant
Member Referral Date
Mr & Mrs Turner
Agent:
02/12/21014
Officer:
Foxwood Designs
Alison Underwood
Process
DEL
Recommendation
To
Latest Update
Public Consultation
None to date.
Consultee Response
weeklywardlistrpt
Page 63
Page 64
Date 02/12/2014
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
WARD:
8/14/0535 Full
St Catherine's and Hurn
Target Date:
29/12/2014
Logged Date: 10/Nov/2014
Location
62a Hurn Way
Applicant
Proposal
Erection of detached pitched roof garage
Member Referral Date
Mr C Palmer
Agent:
02/12/2014
Officer:
Richard Castro-Parker
Process
Street M
DEL
Recommendation
To
Latest Update
Public Consultation
None to date.
Consultee Response
Target Date:
8/14/0532 Full
25/12/2014
Logged Date: 10/Nov/2014
Location
12 Moors Close
Proposal
Single storey extensions to front and rear
Applicant
Member Referral Date
Mrs S Bullus
Agent:
02/12/2014
Colin R Fulton
Architect
Officer:
Richard Castro-Parker
Process
DEL
Recommendation
To
Latest Update
Public Consultation
1 other letter
Consultee Response
weeklywardlistrpt
Page 64
Page 65
Date 02/12/2014
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
WARD:
8/14/0512 Full
St Catherine's and Hurn
Target Date:
18/12/2014
Logged Date: 07/Nov/2014
Location
8 Dudmoor Farm Road
Applicant
Proposal
Demolition of existing property and erection
of new dwelling
Member Referral Date
Mr M Brandon
Agent:
2/12/14
Officer:
Kevin Chilvers
Process
Burns R
DEL
Recommendation
To
Latest Update
Public Consultation
None to date.
Consultee Response
Target Date:
8/14/0545 LA
24/11/2014
Logged Date: 04/Nov/2014
Location
Chapel Lane
Proposal
Variation of Conditions 1 and 4 of planning
permission 8/13/0403 to allow operation of
road sweeping plant until 31 December 2015
and increase in annual throughput to 30,000
tonnes
Applicant
Member Referral Date
Mr T Dampney
Agent:
2/12/14
Officer:
Alliance Planning Sarah Evans
Kim Bowditch
Process
DEL
Recommendation
To NO OBJECTION
Latest Update
Public Consultation
None to date.
Consultee Response
weeklywardlistrpt
Page 65
Page 66
Date 02/12/2014
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
WARD:
8/14/0520 Full
St Catherine's and Hurn
Target Date:
19/01/2015
Logged Date: 28/Oct/2014
Location
Hale Farm, Parley Green Lane (Adjacent to
Rights of Way)
Proposal
Proposed development of a Solar Energy
Farm and connection to the Local Distribution
Network for the local generation of low
carbon electricity.
Applicant
Member Referral Date
Hale Solar Limited
Agent:
25/11/14
Officer:
Alliance Planning
Kim Bowditch
Process
DEL
Recommendation
To
Latest Update
Public Consultation
None to date.
Consultee Response
Transport Development
Management
Rec 10/11/14 -The County Highway Authority has
NO OBJECTION, subject to the following
condition(s):
Before the development is commenced the first 50
metres of the access crossing, measured from the
nearside edge of the carriageway, shall be laid out
and constructed to a specification submitted to and
approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority.
East Midlands Airport
Reason: In the interests of road safety.
Rec 12/11/2014 - The development has been
examined against the aerodrome safeguarding
criteria and due to the location of the array
calculations show that the development would
cause unacceptable levels of solar glare to aircraft
operating in and out of Bournemouth Airport. The
effect on operations in pronounced and severe
throughout the year, making aircraft operations
unsafe if the development was to go ahead.
As a result Bournemouth Airport objects to the
proposal on the grounds of air safety.
weeklywardlistrpt
Page 66
Page 67
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
Date 02/12/2014
WARD:
St Catherine's and Hurn
Natural England
Rec 26/11/2014 - Natural England does not
consider that this application poses any likely or
significant risk to those features of the natural
environment1 for which we would otherwise
provide a more detailed consultation response and
so does not wish to make specific comment on the
details of this consultation.
The lack of case specific comment from Natural
England should not be interpreted as a statement
that there are no impacts on the natural
environment.
weeklywardlistrpt
Page 67
Page 68
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
Date 02/12/2014
WARD:
St Catherine's and Hurn
Environment Agency
Rec 12/11/2014 - Have no objection to the
application but recommend the following
informatives are included on any permission
granted
Surface Water Management
Whilst we accept the principle that volumes of
surface water will not be significantly increased by
the development, there is the potential for drainage
patterns and concentrations to be adversely
impacted. For this reason, we have following
advice with regards to surface water flows. You
should also consult your local drainage engineer to
establish if there are any further requirements.
INFORMATIVE
Measures to offer betterment on existing surface
water rates and volumes to reduce flood risk
elsewhere should be considered given the scale of
the development. The installation of swales on the
downstream boundaries of the sites would ensure
that there is no change on drainage patterns from
the development. These should be installed prior to
construction to manage the risk of changes during
these operations.
Groundwater Protection / Pollution Prevention
During Construction
INFORMATIVE
Safeguards should be implemented during the
construction phase to minimise the risks of
pollution from the development. Such safeguards
should cover:
- the use of plant and machinery
- oils/chemicals and materials
- the use and routing of heavy plant and vehicles
- the location and form of work and storage areas
and compounds
- the control and removal of spoil and wastes
All works must be undertaken in accordance with
the Environment Agency's Pollution Prevention
Guidelines which can be viewed at the following
link:
https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/pollution
-prevention-guidance-ppg
In the event of a pollution incident, the site
operator must contact the Environment Agency
immediately by calling 0800 80 70 60.
Access Tracks Construction
INFORMATIVE
weeklywardlistrpt
Page 68
Page 69
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
WARD:
Date 02/12/2014
St Catherine's and Hurn
Use of road planings (tarmac scalpings) for track
construction requires a Use of Waste in
Construction exemption (U1) under the
Environmental Permitting (England and Wales)
Regulations 2010. It allows the use of suitable
wastes for small scale construction but does not
allow treatment of wastes to be carried out unless
covered by a different exemption. For more
guidance including permitted types of waste and
tonnage please visit: https://www.gov.uk/wasteexemptions-using-waste
weeklywardlistrpt
Page 69
Page 70
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
Date 02/12/2014
WARD:
St Catherine's and Hurn
Hurn Parish Council
Rec 19/11/2014 - object to the above application,
for the following reasons:
1.It was noted that the suggested life of the solar
farm would be 35 years (not the usual 25), and it
was felt that the loss of green belt land for such a
considerable period of time was inappropriate and
unacceptable, especially as the proposed site is
productive agricultural land. It will reduce the
openness of the green belt between Hurn and
Parley.
2.Hurn Parish already has the largest solar farm in
the country along Chapel Lane, which was
submitted in 3 separate applications. The Parish
Council believe that sufficient green belt land has
already been taken up and enclosed by those 3
solar farms in Hurn, and that should additional
farms be granted in a different location, they would
have a detrimental cumulative effect on the green
open space in the Parish. Councillors felt that
“enough is enough”.
3.The solar farm would detrimentally effect the
open visual aspect of this green field and green
belt site and surrounding area.
4.The Parish Council is aware of a proposal for a
second solar farm close to Hale Farm, at
Woodtown Farm in the Parish of West Parley, East
Dorset (application No. 3/14/0956/FUL). It seems
that Hurn Parish Council has not been consulted
on this application, and Parley Parish Council has
not been consulted on the Hale Farm application
as it is in the Parish of Hurn, Christchurch.
Together these proposals would have a
detrimental cumulative visual effect on the area
between Hurn and Parley. It is also the Parish
Council‟s understanding that further applications
may come forward for solar farms in the vicinity of
Hale and Woodtown Farms.
5.The Parish Council is aware that one of the solar
farms off Chapel Lane, which backs on to housing
in Barrack Road, Parley, emits a constant “buzz”
even at night when the panels are not operating.
This is causing annoyance and distress to Parley
residents. Whilst the operators of the site are
investigating the cause, this has been continuing
for many months, and the problem has not been
resolved. Clearly solar farms can cause noise
problems for residents as well as the loss of visual
amenity, both of which would be unacceptable in
weeklywardlistrpt
Page 70
Page 71
Date 02/12/2014
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
WARD:
St Catherine's and Hurn
the Hale Farm location.
Target Date:
8/14/0519 Full
10/12/2014
Logged Date: 28/Oct/2014
Location
23b Springfield Avenue
Proposal
Retrospective application for the retention of
oak framed car port to existing garage
Applicant
Member Referral Date
Mr P Capron
Agent:
2/12/14
Officer:
Alison Underwood
Process
DEL
Recommendation
To GRANT
Latest Update
Public Consultation
1 letter of support
Consultee Response
weeklywardlistrpt
Page 71
Page 72
Date 02/12/2014
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
WARD:
St Catherine's and Hurn
Target Date:
8/14/0502 CondR
09/01/2015
Logged Date: 23/Oct/2014
Location
Chapel Lane, Parley
Proposal
Variation of condition 2 of application
8/13/0332 to allow changes to the
appearance/specification of plant equipment
Applicant
Member Referral Date
ESS Solar Limited
Agent:
9/12/14
Officer:
Alliance Planning
Kim Bowditch
Process
DEL
Recommendation
To GRANT
Latest Update
Public Consultation
None to date.
Consultee Response
English Heritage
Natural England
weeklywardlistrpt
Rec 13/11/14 -No comments.
Rec 05/11/2014 - No objection- no conditions
requested. Natural England is satisfied that the
proposed development being carried out in strict
accordance with the details of the application and
complying with the remaining conditions attached
to the original application (8/13/0332), as
submitted, will not damage or destroy the interest
features for which these sites have been notified.
We therefore advise your authority that this SSSI
does not represent a constraint in determining this
application.
Page 72
Page 73
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
Date 02/12/2014
WARD:
St Catherine's and Hurn
East Dorset District Council
Rec 12/11/2014 -Please be advised that this
Council has recently provided an EIA Screening
request
for a Solar Energy Farm at nearby Woodtown
Farm (250m to the east of the Parley
Lane site).
The EIA Screening concluded that an EIA was not
required although the applicant
was advised to provide a landscape and visual
assessment, to provide a nature
conservation mitigation scheme, and an
archaeological assessment. The applicant
was further advised that due to the close proximity
of the runway to Bournemouth
Airport they might wish to liaise with the Civil
Aviation Authority (CAA) to ascertain
whether the proposed development impacted on
airline safety.
A planning application (3/14/0956/FUL) for the
Woodtown Farm site has recently
been registered by this Council and you may wish
to view the details to ascertain
whether the cumulative effect of both
developments was likely to cause harm. I will
contact you in due course to request Christchurch
Borough Council‟s formal view on
this application.
Hurn Parish Council
Rec 14/11/14 - HPC discussed the application at
their meeting on 10/11/14 and has no comment as
insufficient information was supplied to make a
judgement. There was no detail of what the
condition is, or what difference there would be to
the developmnet if the variation was granted.
East Midlands Airport
Rec 01/12/2014 - The proposed development has
been examined from an aerodrome safeguarding
aspect and does not conflict with safeguarding
criteria. Accordingly, this department has no
safeguarding objection to the proposal.
Environment Agency
Rec 14/11/14- No Objection.
Bournemouth Borough Council
Rec 30/10/2014 - Bournemouth BC previously
responded to the original proposal. The same
issues are likely to be relevant I do not wish to
comment further.
In the circumstances I do not intend to make a
formal comment on the application and will rely on
your authority's assessment of impact and the
benefit of sustainable energy.
weeklywardlistrpt
Page 73
Page 74
Date 02/12/2014
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
WARD:
8/14/0517 Full
St Catherine's and Hurn
Target Date:
08/12/2014
Logged Date: 23/Oct/2014
Location
10 Old Barn Road
Proposal
Retrospective application for the erection of a
2 storey rear extension with an amended roof
form (following approval of planning
application 8/14/0137)
Applicant
Member Referral Date
Mr AB Bowden
Agent:
2/12/14
Officer:
Jo Cleaves
Process
DEL
Recommendation
To GRANT
Latest Update
Public Consultation
None to date.
Consultee Response
weeklywardlistrpt
Page 74
Page 75
Date 02/12/2014
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
WARD:
8/14/0485 Full
St Catherine's and Hurn
Target Date:
09/12/2014
Logged Date: 22/Oct/2014
Location
Parley Court Farm (Adjacent to a Public Right
of Way)
Proposal
Installation of 7 shepherds huts to be used as
accommodation
Applicant
Member Referral Date
Mr T Dampney
Agent:
2/12/14
Officer:
Alliance Planning
Kevin Chilvers
Process
DEL
Recommendation
To REFUSE
Latest Update
Public Consultation
None to date.
Consultee Response
East Midlands Airport
Hurn Parish Council
Transport Development
Management
weeklywardlistrpt
Rec 12/11/14 - The proposed development has
been examined from an aerodrome safeguarding
aspect and does not conflict with safeguarding
criteria. Accordingly, this department has no
safeguarding objection to the proposal.
Rec 14/11/14 - No objectiion subject to the
following conditions being attached to any grant of
permission:
1. The huts are only to be used in association with
the existing wedding business. They must not be a
stand-alone business.
2. The huts will only be used for a few nights at a
time. They must be unoccupied for a certain
number of nights per year to be specified by CBC.
3. If the existing wedding business ceases to trade
the huts must be removed.
If the above conditions are not attached to any
grant, then the Parish Council would object to the
application. Their concern is that at a future date
the huts could be used for accommodation
purposes not associated with the wedding
business.
Rec 31/10/2014 - No objection to the proposal.
Page 75
Page 76
Date 02/12/2014
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
WARD:
8/14/0515 LA
St Catherine's and Hurn
Target Date:
10/11/2014
Logged Date: 22/Oct/2014
Location
Chapel Lane, Parley
Proposal
Proposed reconfiguration of existing and
consented development; introduction of new
plant and processes; increase in permitted
throughput; partial widening of access road;
partial realignment of Bridleway E62/29; new
landscaping and associated matters
Applicant
Member Referral Date
Mr T Dampney
Agent:
18/11/14
Officer:
Alliance Planning
Kim Bowditch
Process
DEL
Recommendation
To NO OBJECTION
Latest Update
Public Consultation
None to date.
Consultee Response
weeklywardlistrpt
Page 76
Page 77
Date 02/12/2014
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
WARD:
8/14/0465 Full
St Catherine's and Hurn
Target Date:
03/12/2014
Logged Date: 17/Oct/2014
Location
2 The Grove (The Crooked Beam Restaurant)
Proposal
Change of use from A3 (Restaurant and Cafe)
to C3 (Residential) to form 2 flats at ground
floor (Revised scheme following refusal of
8/14/0152)
Member Referral Date
Applicant
Mr Simon Hallam
Agent:
18/11/2014
Officer:
Aspire Architects
LLP - M Stevens
Kim Bowditch
Process
DEL
Recommendation
To GRANT
Latest Update
Subject to UU for Heathlands and affordable.
Public Consultation
1 letter of objection 1 other letter
Consultee Response
Transport Development
Management
Rec 07/11/2014 - NO OBJECTION, subject to the
following condition(s):
The development hereby permitted shall not be
occupied or utilised until the parking indicated on
the submitted details has been constructed.
Thereafter, these areas shall be maintained, kept
free from obstruction and available for the
purposes specified.
The existing highway vehicular crossings shall be
expunged and reinstated as raised footway with full
face kerb within 2 months of the new access being
brought into use.
Reason: In the interests of road safety.
weeklywardlistrpt
Page 77
Page 78
Date 02/12/2014
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
WARD:
8/14/0487 Full
St Catherine's and Hurn
Target Date:
01/12/2014
Location
Bostwick Farm Matchams Lane
Proposal
Retention of storage containers
Logged Date: 16/Oct/2014
Applicant
Member Referral Date
Mr D Smith
Agent:
25/11/14
Sheerin Bettle
Architecture - J
Green
Officer:
Kevin Chilvers
Process
DEL
Recommendation
To GRANT
Latest Update
Public Consultation
None to date.
Consultee Response
Hurn Parish Council
Rec 14/11/14 - HPC discussed the application at
their meeting on 10/11/14 and resolved to object.
They considered that the development is not
appropriate in the green belt and no special
circumstances have been provided. Paragraph 87
of the National Planning Policy Framework states
"inappropriate development is, by definition,
harmful to the green belt and should not be
approved except in very special circumstances".
Comment was made that need for these units had
not been demonstrated, as there are local
business areas, for instance the airport business
park, that are not in the green belt that are
specifically designated as appropriate for this type
of development.
The site is bounded by two holiday parks and a
residential house, and the immediate local area
has several other tourist sites. The Parish Council
supports tourism in this area and considers
commercial development to be inappropriate in this
context.
weeklywardlistrpt
Page 78
Page 79
Date 02/12/2014
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
WARD:
8/14/0476 Full
St Catherine's and Hurn
Target Date:
01/12/2014
Logged Date: 10/Oct/2014
Location
Land to the rear of 12 Dudmoor Farm Road
Proposal
Change of use from residential outbuildings
(sheds) to dog grooming facility
Applicant
Member Referral Date
Miss S Rutter
Agent:
25/11/14
Officer:
Aspire Architects
LLP - M Stevens
Kevin Chilvers
Process
DEL
Recommendation
To GRANT
Latest Update
Public Consultation
None to date.
Consultee Response
Target Date:
8/14/0498 Full
28/11/2014
Logged Date: 09/Oct/2014
Location
Existing mast site St Catherines Hill
Proposal
Installation of 2no. dipole antennas, a 1.8m
diameter satellite dish and development
ancillary thereto including 2no. GPS
antennas. (Re-submission of scheme
withdrawn under Application 8/14/0435)
Applicant
Member Referral Date
Arqiva Ltd
Agent:
4/11/14
Officer:
Waldon Telecom Ltd
Kevin Chilvers
Process
COM
Recommendation
To GRANT
Latest Update
Public Consultation
1 letter of support
Consultee Response
Natural England
Hurn Parish Council
weeklywardlistrpt
Rec 27/10/2014 - No objection - no conditions
requested.
Rec 15/10/2014 - No objection.
Page 79
Page 80
Date 02/12/2014
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
WARD:
8/14/0458 Full
St Catherine's and Hurn
Target Date:
25/11/2014
Logged Date: 07/Oct/2014
Location
Iford Golf Centre Riverside Avenue
Proposal
Create Adventure Golf facility on existing
Putting Green and revision of existing car
parking area
Applicant
Member Referral Date
Playgolf Management Ltd
Agent:
4/11/14
Officer:
ADP Ltd - S Belcham
Kim Bowditch
Process
COM
Recommendation
To
Latest Update
Public Consultation
None to date.
Consultee Response
Environment Agency
Rec 19/11/2014 - No objection to the proposed
development subject to the following conditions
and informatives being included in any planning
permission granted.
Flood Risk
There must be no raising of ground levels above
existing level in the floodplain of the River Stour,
which is considered to be land below 4.4mAOD.
This should be demonstrated by predevelopment
and post development surveys.
We would also recommend that you liaise with the
Local Authority Technical Services / Drainage
Engineers to establish if there are any other
sources of flooding / historic flooding in this area or
any impacts on the local watercourse.
CONDITION:
There shall be no raising of ground levels above
existing ground level in the floodplain of the River
Stour. The design flood level is considered in this
location to be land 4.4mAOD.
Hurn Parish Council
weeklywardlistrpt
REASON:
To prevent a loss of floodplain and increase in
flood risk.
Rec 20/10/2014 - No objection.
Page 80
Page 81
Date 02/12/2014
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
WARD:
St Catherine's and Hurn
Target Date:
8/14/0436 CLEUD
11/11/2014
Logged Date: 18/Sep/2014
Location
Longcroft Barrack Road
Proposal
Certificate of lawfulness for the erection and
retention of a steel clad dwelling
Applicant
Member Referral Date
Mr P Dick
Agent:
14/10/2014
Officer:
HLF Planning - D
Bevan
Kim Bowditch
Process
DEL
Recommendation
To
Latest Update
Public Consultation
1 letter of support
Consultee Response
weeklywardlistrpt
Page 81
Page 82
Date 02/12/2014
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
WARD:
8/14/0412 Full
St Catherine's and Hurn
Target Date:
Location
Proposal
17/11/2014
Logged Date: 28/Aug/2014
Chapel Lane, Parley - Adjacent to Eco
Sustainable Solutions Ltd (adjacent to a Right
of Way)
Extension of solar energy farm to cover an
area of 7.2 hectares of land between existing
Phase 1 and Phase 2 solar farms and
connection to the local distribution network
Member Referral Date
Applicant
Mr T Dampney
Agent:
07/10/2014
Officer:
Alliance Planning
Kim Bowditch
Process
DEL
Recommendation
To GRANT
Latest Update
Extension of time 20/12/14
Public Consultation
None to date.
Consultee Response
Bournemouth Borough Council
West Parley Parish Council
Dorset Wildlife Trust
Rec 10/09/2014 - Previous comments still relevant,
do not wish to comment further
Rec 18/09/2014 - no objection to the current
application as it is infill within the existing Phase 1
and 2 developments.
Rec 20/10/2014 - We have an interest in this
proposal due to its potential impacts on the East
Parley Common SNCI SU00/100 which has been
identified as of importance for its areas of dry and
wet heath and remnant mire, supporting 11 Dorset
Notable Species.
We support the comments made by Natural
England in their letter of 15 October. We
recommend that the Council defers decision until
the further information requested by Natural
England is submitted by the applicant.
Additionally we have concerns that this
development could negatively affect the SNCI .
The proposed locations of the solar panels
between the 2 SNCI compartments and between
one of the compartments and the designated site
(Parley Common SSSI, SPA, SAC, Ramsar) will
further isolate the SNCI habitats and likely affect
movement of species between sites, especially as
the survey carried out by the developer indicates
good connecting habitat within the area proposed
for solar panels as shown on Figure 2 Extended
Phase 1 Habitat Survey Map of the preliminary
Ecological Appraisal.
weeklywardlistrpt
Page 82
Page 83
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
Date 02/12/2014
WARD:
St Catherine's and Hurn
East Midlands Airport
Rec 01/10/2014 - The proposed development has
been examined from an aerodrome safeguarding
aspect and does not conflict with safeguarding
criteria. Accordingly, this department has no
safeguarding objection to the proposal.
Natural England
Rec 17/10/2014 - OBJECTION – further
information required.
The applicant has not provided sufficient
information to allow Natural England to advise your
authority that the development will not harm
species which are protected under the Habitats
Regulations 2010 in particular smooth snakes and
sand lizards . These species and their foraging and
resting places are strictly protected under the
Habitats Regulations. They are known from the
adjacent Parley Common SSSI and are typical
species for the SAC. Given the proximity of similar
habitats in the SNCIs and rough grassland habitat
in the development area a reptile survey is
required to determine the value of the development
area for the European Protected Species (EPS)
from both a protected species but also a European
designated site perspective. The habitat is also a
potentially important foraging area for SPA birds
such as woodlark, no survey information is
available.
weeklywardlistrpt
Page 83
Page 84
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
Date 02/12/2014
WARD:
St Catherine's and Hurn
Environment Agency
Rec 17/09/2014 - no objection to the application
but we recommend the following informatives are
included on any permission granted
Surface Water Management
Whilst we accept the principle that volumes of
surface water will not be significantly increased by
the development, there is the potential for drainage
patterns and concentrations to be adversely
impacted. For this reason, we have following
advice with regards to surface water flows. You
should also consult your local drainage engineer to
establish if there are any further requirements.
INFORMATIVE
Measures to offer betterment on existing surface
water rates and volumes to reduce flood risk
elsewhere should be included given the scale of
the development. The installation of swales on the
downstream boundaries of the sites would ensure
that there is no change on drainage patterns from
the development. These should be installed prior to
construction to manage the risk of changes during
these operations.
Land Drainage Consent
INFORMATIVE
If any work obstruct the flow of a watercourse
(permanently or temporarily, including culverting)
you will require prior Land Drainage Consent from
Dorset County Council as the Lead Local Flood
Authority. You are advised to contact the Flood
Risk Management team at Dorset County Council
to discuss requirements.
Pollution Prevention During Construction
INFORMATIVE
Safeguards should be implemented during the
construction phase to minimise the risks of
pollution from the development. Such safeguards
should cover:
- the use of plant and machinery
- oils/chemicals and materials
- the use and routing of heavy plant and vehicles
- the location and form of work and storage areas
and compounds
- the control and removal of spoil and wastes
All works must be undertaken in accordance with
the Environment Agency's Pollution Prevention
Guidelines
Access Tracks Construction
weeklywardlistrpt
Page 84
Page 85
Date 02/12/2014
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
WARD:
St Catherine's and Hurn
INFORMATIVE
Use of road planings (tarmac scalpings) for track
construction requires a Use of Waste in
Construction exemption (U1) under the
Environmental Permitting (England and Wales)
Regulations 2010. It allows the use of suitable
wastes for small scale construction but does not
allow treatment of wastes to be carried out unless
covered by a different exemption.
Hurn Parish Council
Rec 15/09/2014 - No objections
Target Date:
8/14/0362 CLEUD
15/09/2014
Logged Date: 24/Jul/2014
Location
The Stables Dudmoor Farm Road
Proposal
Certificate of lawfulness for the change of use
of the existing stable as a residential dwelling
Applicant
Member Referral Date
Mr N Robinson
Agent:
19/8/14
Officer:
Kim Bowditch
Process
DEL
Recommendation
To NOT LAWFUL
Latest Update
Public Consultation
None to date.
Consultee Response
weeklywardlistrpt
Page 85
Page 86
Date 02/12/2014
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
WARD:
8/14/0327 Full
St Catherine's and Hurn
Target Date:
Location
Proposal
01/09/2014
Logged Date: 14/Jul/2014
The Office Parley Court Farm Parley Green
Lane (Within curtilage of a Grade II Listed
Building)
Roof, window and door replacement, external
refurbishment works, internal alterations to
existing building situated within curtilage of a
Grade II Listed Building. Change of use of 1st
floor from C3 (Residential) to B1 (Office).
Demolition of existing conservatory
Member Referral Date
Applicant
Mr T Dampney
Agent:
05/08/2014
P H Warr plc
Officer:
Melanie Smith
Process
DEL
Recommendation
To GRANT
Latest Update
Awaiting confirmation of UU re transport constributions
Public Consultation
None to date.
Consultee Response
Transport Development
Management
Hurn Parish Council
weeklywardlistrpt
Rec 30/07/2014 - No objection to the proposal.
Rec 18/08/2014 - No objection
Page 86
Page 87
Date 02/12/2014
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
WARD:
8/14/0264 Full
St Catherine's and Hurn
Target Date:
16/07/2014
Logged Date: 04/Jun/2014
Location
12 (Stable Cottage) & 13 Dudmoor Farm Road
Proposal
Change of use of exsiting dwelling (C3) to
Offices (B1). Change of use of existing office
(B1) to a dwelling (C3)
Member Referral Date
Applicant
Miss S Rutter
Agent:
1/7/14
Officer:
Aspire Architects
LLP - M Stevens
Kevin Chilvers
Process
DEL
Recommendation
To GRANT
Latest Update
Subject to consideration of implications of adjacent residential appeal decision - awaiting completion of
Section 106
Public Consultation
None to date.
Consultee Response
Transport Development
Management
Rec 10/06/2014 - NO OBJECTION to the proposal
but it should be noted that Dudmoor Farm Road
is a private street and not public highway
maintainable at public expense and that the red
line boundary doesn‟t extend to the public highway.
The applicant should be advised that the Advance
Payments Code under Sections 219-225 of the
Highways Act 1980 may apply in this instance.
The Code secures payment towards the future
making-up of a private street prior to the
commencement of any building works associated
with residential, commercial and industrial
development. The intention of the Code is to
reduce the liability of potential road charges on any
future purchasers which may arise if the private
street is not made-up to a suitable standard and
adopted as publicly maintained highway. Further
information is available from Dorset County
Council‟s Developer-Led Infrastructure team. They
can be reached by telephone at 01305 225401, by
email at [email protected], or in writing at
Developer-Led Infrastructure, Dorset County
Council, County Hall, Dorchester, DT1 1XJ.
To fight fires effectively the Fire and Rescue
Service needs to be able to manoeuvre its
equipment and appliances to within a specified
distance of any premises. The applicant should be
advised to consult with Building Control and Dorset
Fire and Rescue Service to ensure that Fire
Safety - Approved Document B of The Building
Regulations 2000 - can be fully complied with as
weeklywardlistrpt
Page 87
Page 88
Date 02/12/2014
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
WARD:
St Catherine's and Hurn
this may be an issue.
Target Date:
8/14/0122 Full
19/06/2014
Logged Date: 09/May/2014
Location
Hurn View House 5 Aviation Park West
Proposal
Re-site Bio-Treatment plant to new land and
place portable building at the end of the site
nearest 'Meggitts' Extend car park up to the
portable building and fence boundary
Member Referral Date
Applicant
Mrs T Moss
03/06/2014
Agent:
Officer:
Jo Cleaves
Process
DEL
Recommendation
To GRANT
Latest Update
Awaiting further information from Applicant
Awaiting legal
Public Consultation
1 other letter
Consultee Response
Environment Agency
Hurn Parish Council
weeklywardlistrpt
Rec 23/05/2014 - No objection to the development
, but recommend the following informatives. We
can also offer the following advice regarding flood
risk.
Foul Drainage
The National Planning Policy Framework Planning
Practice Guidance states that when drawing up
wastewater treatment proposals for any
development, the first presumption is to provide a
system of foul drainage discharging into a public
sewer to be treated at a public sewage treatment
works (those provided and operated by the water
and sewerage companies). This should be done in
consultation with the sewerage company of the
area.
Where a connection to a public foul sewer is not
feasible (in terms of cost and/or practicality) a
package sewage treatment plant can be
considered. The package sewage treatment plant
should offer treatment so that the final discharge
from it meets the standards set by the required
Environment Agency Environmental Permit
A proposal for a package sewage treatment plant
and infrastructure should set out clearly the
responsibility and means of operation and
management to ensure that the permit is not likely
to be infringed in the life of the plant.
Rec 19/05/2014 - No comments
Page 88
Page 89
Date 02/12/2014
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
WARD:
St Catherine's and Hurn
Target Date:
8/06/0372 Renew
20/10/2010
Logged Date: 22/Jun/2006
Location
Bournemouth Sports Club, Chapel Gate
Proposal
Renewal of planning permission 8/01/0462 for
outline planning permission for the erection
of 2 indoor sports buildings and extension of
the main clubhouse building and associated
car parking areas
Member Referral Date
Applicant
Bournemouth Sports Club
Agent:
26/7/06
Miller. Martin
Officer:
Giles Moir
Process
COM
Recommendation
To GRANT
Latest Update
Additional information received 25th August 2010 - Flood Risk Assessment
Public Consultation
None to date.
Consultee Response
East Midlands Airport
Hurn Parish Council
weeklywardlistrpt
Rec 30/6/06 - Request for further info.
Rec 13/07/2006 - No objection but would like to
make the following conditions, external lighting
must be flat glass, full cut off design with horizontal
mountings and ensures there is no light spill. No
building shall be constructed higher than
neighbouring builidngs. Any construction work
must comply with Safeguarding of Aerodromes
Advice Note 4, Cranes and Other Construction
Issues, whereby if a crane is required the airport
must be notified prior to work commencing. All
landscaping must comply withAdvice Note 3,
Potential Bird Hazards from Amenity Landscaping
and Building Control.
Rec 23/9/2010 - we have no objections to the
proposed renewal provding the following condtions
from the previous consent are replicated on any
new consent.
Rec 13/07/2006 - No Objection
Page 89
Page 90
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
Date 02/12/2014
WARD:
St Catherine's and Hurn
Environment Agency
Rec13/07/2006 - Object as there is no Flood Risk
Assessment.
Rec 4/8/06 - Remove objection following receipt of
letter from Mr M Miller. Considered that
confirmation that ' all surface water from the
proposed development will be discharged to
soakaways' constitutes a basic flood risk
assessment. Further comments re. Land drainage
consent & that any culverting of watercourse
requires the prior written approval of the EA.
Natural England
Transport Development
Management
East Dorset District Council
Sport England
Count of applications:
weeklywardlistrpt
Rec 23/9/200 - we have no objection to the
proposed development subject to the following
condtions and informatives being included in any
planning permission granted.
Rec 20/09/2010 - No Comments
Rec 18/07/2006 - No Objection
Rec 6/7/06 - EDDC surprised that scheme
received PP in first place & wishes to object to the
renewal on the grounds that it would be
inappropriate development in the green belt &
would conflict with the openess of the Green Belt
and the purpose of including land in it.
Rec 6/7/06 - Supported the original application
(8/01/0462) & wishes to support the renewal.
26
Page 90
Page 91
Date 02/12/2014
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
WARD:
8/14/0576 Full
Town Centre
Target Date:
15/01/2015
Location
1 Kingfishers 15 Willow Way
Proposal
Extension to existing balcony
Logged Date: 01/Dec/2014
Applicant
Member Referral Date
Mr Bates
Agent:
23/12/2014
Officer:
Richard Castro-Parker
Process
Richards B
DEL
Recommendation
To
Latest Update
Public Consultation
None to date.
Consultee Response
Target Date:
8/14/0541 Full
06/01/2015
Logged Date: 21/Nov/2014
Location
2 Gleadowe Avenue
Proposal
Erection of double garage to rear of property
Applicant
Member Referral Date
Mr P Buckle
Agent:
16/12/14
Officer:
Diana Mezzogori-Curran
Process
DEL
Recommendation
To
Latest Update
Public Consultation
None to date.
Consultee Response
weeklywardlistrpt
Page 91
Page 92
Date 02/12/2014
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
WARD:
Town Centre
Target Date:
8/14/0554 CondR
Location
Proposal
16/02/2015
Logged Date: 19/Nov/2014
Land rear of 43 High Street (Christchurch
Central Conservation Area & Adjacent to
Grade II Listed Building)
Variation of Condition 2 to enable the
approved A1 shop to be used as an A3
Restaurant/Cafe and the approved A3
Restaurant/Cafe as an A1 shop
Applicant
Member Referral Date
Renaissance Retirement Ltd
Agent:
16/12/14
Tanner & Tilley
Officer:
Kim Bowditch
Process
DEL
Recommendation
To
Latest Update
Public Consultation
None to date.
Consultee Response
English Heritage
Transport Development
Management
weeklywardlistrpt
Rec 27/11/2014 - Our specialist staff have
considered the information received and we do not
wish to offer any comments on this occasion.
Recommendation: The application(s) should be
determined in accordance with national and local
policy guidance, and on the basis of your specialist
conservation advice.
Rec 21/11/2014 - No objection to the proposal.
Page 92
Page 93
Date 02/12/2014
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
WARD:
Town Centre
Target Date:
8/14/0558 CondR
Location
Proposal
01/01/2015
Logged Date: 17/Nov/2014
The Priory Vicarage 13a Church Street (within
Christchurch Central Conservation Area,
Grade II Listed Building and affecting setting
Variation
of Listed
condition
3 of application
of Grade II*
Building
and setting of
8/11/0524
to allow occupation of the house by
Priory)
tenants
Applicant
Member Referral Date
Mr R Hawkins
Agent:
09/12/2014
Officer:
Melanie Smith
Process
DEL
Recommendation
To
Latest Update
Public Consultation
1 letter of objection 1 letter of support
Consultee Response
English Heritage
Rec 01/12/2014 - Our specialist staff have
considered the information received and we do not
wish to offer any comments on this occasion.
Recommendation: The application(s) should be
determined in accordance with national and local
policy guidance, and on the basis of your specialist
conservation advice.
weeklywardlistrpt
Page 93
Page 94
Date 02/12/2014
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
WARD:
8/14/0509 Full
Town Centre
Target Date:
15/12/2014
Logged Date: 23/Oct/2014
Location
Twynham School, Sopers Lane
Applicant
Proposal
Erection of 2 storey block of 6 classrooms
Member Referral Date
Twynham School
Agent:
9/12/14
Officer:
Alison Underwood
Process
Dorset County
Council - Peter
Moore
DEL
Recommendation
To GRANT
Latest Update
Public Consultation
1 other letter
Consultee Response
Environment Agency
Rec 14/11/14 - No objection.
These are ancillary buildings to the main use and
falls within the scope of our Local Flood Risk
Standing Advice. Therefore, please refer to this
advice for determining this application.
Target Date:
8/14/0504 Ad
04/12/2014
Logged Date: 20/Oct/2014
Location
22 Saxon Square (Robert Dyas Ltd) (within
Christchurch Central Conservation Area)
Proposal
Replacement of 1x illuminated fascia
Applicant
Member Referral Date
Robert Dyas Ltd
Agent:
18/11/2014
Officer:
Zillwoods Limited
Melanie Smith
Process
COM
Recommendation
To GRANT
Latest Update
Public Consultation
None to date.
Consultee Response
weeklywardlistrpt
Page 94
Page 95
Date 02/12/2014
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
WARD:
8/14/0352 Ad
Town Centre
Target Date:
06/10/2014
Logged Date: 12/Aug/2014
Location
Saxon Square Shopping Centre (Christchurch
Central Conservation Area)
Proposal
Installation of 3 x internally illuminated
direction signs, 4 x halo illuminated fascia
signs and 29 non-illuminated projecting signs
(amended description).
Applicant
Member Referral Date
Mr B Taylor
Agent:
2/9/14
DDA Display - J
Laverack
Officer:
Melanie Smith
Process
COM
Recommendation
To GRANT
Latest Update
Public Consultation
None to date.
Consultee Response
Conservation Officer CBC
Transport Development
Management
weeklywardlistrpt
Rec 18/08/2014 - Whilst some of the elements (the
Projecting and Directory Signs) are acceptable
subject to detail changes and Condition, Signs A –
D are entirely inappropriate and would merely add
to the existing visually and materially inappropriate
signage, contrary to the aims and aspirations of
the Council, as outlined in their published
Conservation Area Appraisal and Shopfronts and
Advertising Design Guide.
With this major shortcoming in mind, the proposals
as here presented cannot be supported from a
Conservation Standpoint and I would therefore
recommend that they be rejected.
Rec 24/11/2014 - I consider the signage will not
pose any highway safety issues.
Page 95
Page 96
Date 02/12/2014
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
WARD:
8/14/0285 Full
Town Centre
Target Date:
30/07/2014
Logged Date: 10/Jun/2014
Location
Christchurch Sailing Club The Quay
(Christchurch Central Conservation Area)
Proposal
Erection of single storey first floor extension
to rear (SE elevation)
Member Referral Date
Applicant
Mr R Cobelli
Agent:
1/7/14
Officer:
Aspire Architects
LLP - M Stevens
Richard Castro-Parker
Process
COM
Recommendation
To GRANT
Latest Update
Planning Application 8/14/0078 is hereby approved, in accordance with plan numbers ASP.13.057.001
revision C, ASP.13.057.009 received on 22nd May 2014 and ASP.13.057.006 revision B, ASP.13.057.007
revision B, ASP.13.057.008 revision B received on 7th August 2014 unless otherwise agreed in writing
with the Local Planning Authority as it is the view of the Council that the development authorised by this
permission satisfies the requirements of the National Planning Policy Framework and Policies BE4,
BE16, ENV7, ENV8 of the Borough of Christchurch Local Plan (2001) and KS3 and KS12 of the
Christchurch and East Dorset Local Plan Core Strategy (2014). The attached conditions are required in
order to ensure the development, once commenced or constructed, continues to comply with the policies
set out above.
In accordance with paragraphs 186 and 187 of the NPPF Christchurch Borough Council (CBC) takes a
positive and proactive approach to development proposals focused on solutions. CBC work with
applicants/agents in a positive and proactive manner by;
•
offering a pre-application advice service, and
•
as appropriate updating applications/agents of any issues that may arise in the processing of their
application and where possible suggesting solutions.
•
The applicant was provided the opportunity to submit address issues which were found to be acceptable
and permission was granted.
•
was provided with pre-application advice,
•
the application was dealt with/approved without delay.
Public Consultation
27 letters of objection 1 letter of support
Consultee Response
weeklywardlistrpt
Page 96
Page 97
Date 02/12/2014
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
WARD:
8/14/0251 Full
Town Centre
Target Date:
11/07/2014
Logged Date: 02/Jun/2014
Location
Rear of 1-3 High Street (Town Centre
Conservation Area)
Proposal
Erection of 2½ storey building comprising 4x2
bed and 5x1 bed maisonettes (9 in total) and
227m² of commercial floor space (A1 Retail,
A2 Financial and Professional, B1 Offices &
D2 Assembley & Leisure) with associated
parking and access from Sopers Lane
Member Referral Date
Applicant
Mr A Brown
Agent:
30/09/2014
Officer:
Ellis and Partners D Rainback
Kim Bowditch
Process
COM
Recommendation
To GRANT
Latest Update
Archaeological investigations required - extension of time requested.
Public Consultation
4 letters of objection
Consultee Response
Planning Policy Team Leader CBC
Rec 23/10/2014 - My comments in relation to this
application are restricted to the following issues:
•
Mix of Uses
•
Contributions
•
Affordable Housing
Commercial Uses: The application site is located
to the rear of the High Street and the Primary
Shopping Frontage identified in Policy CH3 of the
Core Strategy but within the Primary Shopping
Area. The proposal for 237sqm of A1 retail
floorspace is appropriate in this location at ground
floor level, providing a continuation of an active
retail frontage from the High Street and
contributing to retail floorspace requirements
identified in Policy KS8.
Residential Units: The principle of residential
development in this location above ground floor
level is accepted and will make a contribution to
housing requirements identified in Policy KS4 of
the Core Strategy and the Town Centre Vision set
out in Core Strategy Policy CH1. The Bournemouth
and Poole Strategic Housing Market Assessment
(2011) identifies local housing need and assesses
future housing need by tenure and size. In terms of
market housing greatest demand is for 2 and 3 bed
dwellings in Christchurch with very limited demand
for 1 bedroom dwellings for market housing. In
terms of affordable housing, greatest demand is for
weeklywardlistrpt
Page 97
Page 98
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
WARD:
Date 02/12/2014
Town Centre
1 and 2 bed dwellings, however no affordable
housing is proposed as part of this scheme.
Affordable Housing Provision: Detailed pre
application advice has been provided by the
Christchurch development management team on
this proposal prior to adoption of the Core Strategy
and prior to the 14th March when guidance was
issued regarding the status of the Core Strategy in
decision making. In this respect, pre application
advice has been provided in accordance with
Policy H8 of the 2001 Christchurch Local Plan.
Policy H8 required affordable housing on sites of
15 or more dwellings or on residential sites of 1
hectare or more. As such the Council has not
requested an affordable housing contribution for 9
dwellings.
Contributions: This development is liable to make a
payment in accordance with the adopted Dorset
Heathlands Planning Framework to mitigate
increased recreational pressure on the Dorset
Heaths.
Natural England
weeklywardlistrpt
The proposal is also liable to make a contribution
under the South East Dorset Transport
Contributions Scheme. I understand that Dorset
County Council have advised on uplift in trip
generation from the proposal and have concluded
that the proposal would result in a decrease in trips
and no contribution is required.
Rec 11/06/2014 - Natural England objects to this
application proposal unless the applicant
contributes to the mitigation set out in the SPD in
accordance with the levels and procedures for this
contribution.
This advice on mitigation also applies in meeting
legislative and policy considerations on the
protection, conservation and enhancement of the
heathland SSSIs and Ramsar site.
Page 98
Page 99
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
WARD:
Date 02/12/2014
Town Centre
Wessex Water
weeklywardlistrpt
Rec 10/06/2014 - Wessex Water can advise the
following comments in response to your
consultation letter.
Water Supply and Waste Connections
Please note that Semcorp Bournemouth Water is
responsible for Water Supply in this area.
Waste water connections will be required from
Wessex Water to serve this proposed
development. Application forms and guidance
information is available from the Developer
Services web-pages at our website
www.wessexwater.co.uk
Please note that DEFRA intend to implement new
regulations that will require the adoption of all new
private sewers. All connections subject to these
new regulations will require a signed adoption
agreement with Wessex Water before any
drainage works commence.
Further information can be obtained from our New
Connections Team by telephoning 01225 526333
for Waste Water.
Protection of Existing Assets
A public rising main is shown on record plans
within the land identified for the proposed
development. It appears that development
proposals may affect existing infrastructure. It is
recommended that the applicant contacts Wessex
Water Sewer Protection Team for further advice on
this matter.
Building over existing infrastructure will not be
permitted (without agreement) from Wessex Water
under Building Regulations.
Building Near to a Public Sewer/Rising Main
No building will be permitted within the statutory
easement width of 3 metres from the pipeline
without agreement from Wessex Water. Please
telephone our Sewer Protection Team to discuss
further 01225 526333.
Sprinklers
Non domestic supplies required for firefighting or
commercial use will require assessment with
networks modelling subject to design
requirements. We will normally recommend the
use of storage tanks where network capacity is not
available or where off site reinforcement is
necessary to provide the stated demand.
Page 99
Page 100
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
Date 02/12/2014
WARD:
Town Centre
Transport Development
Management
DCC Archaeologist
Rec 23/06/2014 - NO OBJECTION, subject to the
following condition(s):
The development hereby permitted shall not be
occupied or utilised until the cycle parking
indicated on the submitted details have been
constructed. Thereafter, these shall be
maintained, kept free from obstruction and
available for the purposes specified.
Reason: In the interests of road safety.
Rec 30/06/2014 - The site of the proposed
development lies within the historic core of
Christchurch. Known archaeological remains in
the vicinity include, to the south-west, Scheduled
Monument 1002371 ('Site of Town Walls in, and E
of, Druitt Gardens') which covers part of the town's
Saxon defences and, to the east and north, the
Saxon remains recorded in Saxon Square and the
early Saxon cemetery recorded on the
supermarket site across Fountain Way.
Hence, it is likely that the proposed development
would affect archaeological remains, and so I
advise that Christchurch Borough Council should
request the applicant to carry out an archaeological
evaluation of the proposed development, before
determination, in order for an informed planning
decision to be made. It would also be appropriate
for the applicant to assess the impact of the
proposed development on the setting of the nearby
Scheduled Monument.
Count of applications:
weeklywardlistrpt
9
Page 100
Page 101
Date 02/12/2014
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
WARD:
8/14/0521 Ad
West Highcliffe
Target Date:
09/01/2015
Logged Date: 27/Nov/2014
Location
104 Saffron Drive (Hoburne Dental Practice)
Proposal
Installation of non illuminated fascia sign and
non illuminated post mounted sign
Applicant
Member Referral Date
Mr P Willy
23/12/14
Officer:
Agent:
Melanie Smith
Process
DEL
Recommendation
To
Latest Update
Public Consultation
None to date.
Consultee Response
Target Date:
8/14/0563 CLOPD
05/01/2015
Logged Date: 24/Nov/2014
Location
79 Smgglers Lane North
Proposal
Certificate of Lawfulness for the erection of
roof extensions to form 2 side gables.
Erection of rear dormer and roof link to
existing side garage
Applicant
Member Referral Date
Mr S Phillips
Agent:
16/12/2014
Officer:
Diana Mezzogori-Curran
Process
DEL
Recommendation
To
Latest Update
Public Consultation
None to date.
Consultee Response
weeklywardlistrpt
Page 101
Page 102
Date 02/12/2014
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
WARD:
8/14/0493 Full
West Highcliffe
Target Date:
05/01/2015
Logged Date: 11/Nov/2014
Location
3 Clive Road
Proposal
Extend and convert existing garage to form
habitable accommodation
Applicant
Member Referral Date
Mr & Mrs Coombs
Agent:
2/12/14
Officer:
Structural
Consultancy
Services - B Morton
Diana Mezzogori-Curran
Process
DEL
Recommendation
To
Latest Update
Public Consultation
None to date.
Consultee Response
weeklywardlistrpt
Page 102
Page 103
Date 02/12/2014
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
WARD:
8/14/0513 Full
West Highcliffe
Target Date:
22/12/2014
Logged Date: 06/Nov/2014
Location
47 Smugglers Lane North
Proposal
Sever land and erect 1 x 4 bed chalet
bungalow with garage following demolition of
existing garage
Applicant
Member Referral Date
AJ Housing Ltd
Agent:
2/12/14
Officer:
Anders Roberts &
Assoc
Kevin Chilvers
Process
DEL
Recommendation
To
Latest Update
Public Consultation
3 letters of objection
Consultee Response
Natural England
Transport Development
Management
Rec 25/11/2014 - Objects to this application
proposal unless the applicant contributes to the
mitigation set out in the SPD in accordance with
the levels and procedures for this contribution.
Rec 27/11/2014 - NO OBJECTION, subject to the
following condition(s):
The development hereby permitted shall not be
occupied or utilised until the access, parking and
turning indicated on the submitted details has been
constructed. Thereafter, these areas shall be
maintained, kept free from obstruction and
available for the purposes specified.
Reason: In the interests of road safety.
weeklywardlistrpt
Page 103
Page 104
Date 02/12/2014
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
WARD:
8/14/0537 Full
West Highcliffe
Target Date:
17/12/2014
Location
9 Buckland Grove
Proposal
Erection of conservatory to rear
Logged Date: 31/Oct/2014
Member Referral Date
Applicant
Mr & Mrs JJ Swaine
Agent:
2/12/14
Officer:
Diana Mezzogori-Curran
Process
Ernest Hague
DEL
Recommendation
To GRANT
Latest Update
Public Consultation
None to date.
Consultee Response
Target Date:
8/14/0467 Full
16/12/2014
Logged Date: 24/Oct/2014
Location
18 Primrose Way
Proposal
Erection of single storey rear extension and
formation of first storey extension over
existing garage
Member Referral Date
Applicant
Mr M Dewey
Agent:
9/12/14
David Arthur
Officer:
Melanie Smith
Process
DEL
Recommendation
To GRANT
Latest Update
Grant subject to receipt of amended plans
Public Consultation
1 letter of objection 2 letters of support
Consultee Response
Transport Development
Management
weeklywardlistrpt
Rec 28/11/2014 - no objection to the proposal
Page 104
Page 105
Date 02/12/2014
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
WARD:
8/14/0511 Full
West Highcliffe
Target Date:
09/12/2014
Logged Date: 22/Oct/2014
Location
6 Birchwood Close
Applicant
Proposal
Single storey ground floor rear extension and
new dormer to front elevation
Member Referral Date
Mr & Mrs K Dingley
Agent:
25/11/14
Officer:
David Mann Architect
Alison Underwood
Process
DEL
Recommendation
To GRANT
Latest Update
Public Consultation
1 other letter
Consultee Response
Target Date:
8/14/0516 Full
08/12/2014
Location
101 Forest Way
Proposal
Porch infill to side of property
Logged Date: 21/Oct/2014
Applicant
Member Referral Date
Mrs Newman
Agent:
11/11/14
Zenith Staybrite
Officer:
Diana Mezzogori-Curran
Process
DEL
Recommendation
To GRANT
Latest Update
Public Consultation
None to date.
Consultee Response
weeklywardlistrpt
Page 105
Page 106
Date 02/12/2014
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT of Planning Applications
WARD:
8/14/0443 Full
West Highcliffe
Target Date:
08/12/2014
Logged Date: 21/Oct/2014
Location
87 The Meadway
Applicant
Proposal
Erection of single storey extension to side
following demolition of the existing garage
Member Referral Date
2/12/14
Officer:
Agent:
Mr A Burgess
Jo Cleaves
Process
DEL
Recommendation
To GRANT
Latest Update
Public Consultation
None to date.
Consultee Response
Target Date:
8/14/0499 Full
03/12/2014
Logged Date: 17/Oct/2014
Location
14 Rossley Close
Applicant
Proposal
Roof enlargement to provide additional
accomodation at 1st floor level to include
dormer windows and roof lights. Erection of
rear single storey pitched roof extension and
demolish existing conservatory
Member Referral Date
Mr & Mrs Mahony
Agent:
2/12/14
Chris Morris
Officer:
Kevin Chilvers
Process
DEL
Recommendation
To GRANT
Latest Update
Public Consultation
None to date.
Consultee Response
Count of applications:
weeklywardlistrpt
10
Page 106
Development Services Appeal Progress Schedule for w/c 02 December 2014
Planning Code, Location
Address and Inspectorate
Reference
8/13/0082
Land r/o 44 Purewell (Purwell
Conservation Area) BH23 1ES
Proposal
Type of
Appeal
Case
officer
Start Date
Questionnaire and
Supporting Documents
Statements
Due
Sent
Due
Sent
Final
Comment
Date
Site Visit
Date
Hearing or
Inquiry Date
18/11/2014
N/a
Demolition of existing workshop and erection Written Rep
of 2 storey 2 bed detached dwelling
KB
24/01/2014
07/02/2014
05/02/2014
07/03/2014
07/03/2014
28/03/2014
Written Rep
Sever land and erect 1x4 bed detached
dwelling with associated parking and access
from Woodhayes Road. Erect 2 storey
extension to the southen elevation of the
existing property. Demolish existing garage
JMC
22/05/2014
05/06/2014
29/05/2014
26/06/2014
26/06/2014
24/07/2014
N/a
Written Rep
The use of land and the replacement of
existing established use of 2 no. residential
caravans with a single dwelling house (resubmission)
KC
24/06/2014
08/07/2014
01/07/2014
29/07/2014
29/07/2014
26/08/2014
N/a
15/09/2014
23/09/2014
N/a
Decision
and Date
APP/E1210/A/14/2212353
8/13/0515
1 Woodhayes Avenue BH23 4RW
APP/E1210/A/14/2218766
8/13/0316
17 Dudmoor Farm Road BH23 6AQ
APP/E1210/A/14/2220643
8/12/0514
Berry Hill Purification Works, Watery
Lane, Throop (CONSULTATION
ONLY)
Access track and Bailey Bridge to serve
Berry Hill Sewage Treatment Works
(CONSULTATION ONLY)
Hearing
KB
14/07/2014
28/07/2014
Variation of Condition 2 so as to allow
changes to the ground floor layout
(increasing living space to flat 1 and
decreasing the number of seperate shop
units by 1)
Written Rep
JMC
07/08/2014
21/08/2014
14/08/2014
25/09/2014
24/09/2014
09/10/2014
Retrospective application for the erection of Written Rep
a boundary wall (AMENDED DESCRIPTION)
MS
20/08/2014
03/09/2014
27/08/2014
24/09/2014
17/09/2014
22/10/2014
18/08/2014
APP/C1245/A/2221524
8/14/0046
The Royalty Inn 60 Bargates
APP/E1210/A/14/2223283
8/14/0194
1 Hestan Close BH23 2TG
21/10/2014
N/a
Dismissed
25/11/2014
APP/E1210/A/14/2223910
8/13/0474
Meteor Retail Park Somerford Road
BH23 3RU
APP/E1210/A/14/2224606
appealprogschedulerpt
Written Rep
Outline application for the erection of an
A1(Retail) warehouse park to provide a new
food store with associated changes to the
highway and car parking arrangement
(matters for consideration are access and
layout) (Revised scheme following grant of
KC
05/09/2014
19/09/2014
12/09/2014
10/10/2014
10/10/2014
07/11/2014
N/a
Page 1
Development Services Appeal Progress Schedule for w/c 02 December 2014
Planning Code, Location
Address and Inspectorate
Reference
8/13/0550
Proposal
Formation of 2x studio flats in roofspace
Type of
Appeal
Case
officer
Start Date
Questionnaire and
Supporting Documents
Statements
Due
Sent
Due
Sent
Final
Comment
Date
Site Visit
Date
Hearing or
Inquiry Date
Written Rep
KB
10/09/2014
24/09/2014
15/09/2014
15/10/2014
15/10/2014
12/11/2014
N/a
Conversion of existing garage in to a self Written Rep
contained studio apartment with access from
Stanley Road
KC
18/09/2014
02/10/2014
24/09/2014
23/10/2014
23/10/2014
20/11/2014
N/a
Written Rep
Demolition of existing buildings and
structures. Redevelop site to provide a new
food store (Class A1) with associated
undercroft and surface parking, servicing,
pedestrian access (including new link to
Bridge Street) and vehicular access
KC
22/09/2014
06/10/2014
26/09/2014
27/10/2014
27/10/2014
24/11/2014
N/a
Written Rep
Conversion of existing roof space to 2x
studio flats to include roof lights to front and
rear
KB
08/10/2014
22/10/2014
15/10/2014
12/11/2014
12/11/2014
10/12/2014
N/a
Erection of 11 x 2 bed dwellings with integral
garages and associated access and parking
following demolition of the existing
KC
15/10/2014
29/10/2014
16/10/2014
19/11/2014
17/12/2014
09/12/2014
KB
19/11/2014
03/12/2014
01/12/2014
24/12/2014
21/01/2015
N/a
Decision
and Date
9 The Grove BH23 2EX
APP/E1210/A/14/2224976
8/13/0544
R/o 350/350a Lymington Road BH23
5EY
APP/E1210/A/14/2225627
8/13/0366
Land West of Stony Lane and North of
Bridge Street (Formerly Beagle Aircraft
Ltd) & (Formerly Car Sales Garage)
APP/E1210/A/14/2225348
8/13/0489
23-25A Purewell (Purewell
Conservation Area) BH23 1EH
APP/E1210/A/14/2226057
8/13/0459
60 Purewell (Priory Engineering Co
Ltd) (within Purewell Conservation
Area) BH23 1ES
Hearing
APP/E1210/A/14/2226773
8/13/0525
The Pines 39 Mudeford BH23 3NQ
Demolition of existing hotel and erection of Written Rep
1x block of 8x2 bed flats with associated bin
and cycle storage and parking provision
APP/E1210/A/14/2228799
appealprogschedulerpt
Page 2