Dose response of PEG 3350 for the treatment of childhood fecal impaction Nader N. Youssef, MD, John M. Peters, DO, Wendy Henderson, CRNP, Sandra Shultz-Peters, CRNP, Danielle K. Lockhart, CRNP, and Carlo Di Lorenzo, MD Objective: To investigate the efficacy and safety of polyethylene glycol (PEG) 3350 in the treatment of childhood fecal impaction. Methods: This was a prospective, double-blind, parallel, randomized study of 4 doses of PEG 3350; 0.25 g/kg per day, 0.5 g/kg per day, 1 g/kg per day, 1.5 g/kg per day, given for 3 days in children with constipation for >3 months and evidence of fecal impaction. Results: Forty patients completed the study (27 boys, median age 7.5, range 3.3-13.1 years). Disimpaction occurred in 75% of children, with a significant difference between the two higher doses and the lower doses (95% vs 55%, P < .005). All groups had an increased number of bowel movements during the 5-day study versus baseline, respectively: 6.5 versus 1.1 (P < .005), 8.0 versus 1.3 (P < .005), 10.9 versus 1.7 (P < .005), and 12.3 versus 1.4 (P < .005). Adverse effects included nausea (5%), vomiting (5%), bloating (18%), cramping (5%), and diarrhea (13%). Diarrhea and bloating were more prevalent (P < .02) in the higher-dose than in the lower-dose group. No clinically significant changes in electrolytes were noted. Conclusions: The 3-day administration of PEG 3350 is safe and effective in the treatment of childhood fecal impaction at doses of 1 and 1.5 g/kg per day. (J Pediatr 2002;141:410-4) Functional fecal retention is the most common cause of chronic constipation and fecal soiling in children.1 In this condition, there are repetitive attempts to avoid defecation because of fears of a painful evacuation. Consequently, a large fecal mass accumulates in the rectum. The North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, in a recently published statement on the evaluation and treatment of childhood constipation, suggested that fecal disimpaction is beneficial before initiation of maintenance therapy.2 Clearance of fecal material may be achieved with oral or From the Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine and Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Supported by Braintree Laboratories Incorporated, General Clinical Research Center, Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, National Institutes of Health Grant No. M01RR00084. Submitted for publication Feb 1, 2002; revisions received Mar 20, 2002 and May 6, 2002; accepted May 15, 2002. Reprint requests: Nader N. Youssef, MD, 3705 Fifth Ave at DeSoto St, Pittsburgh, PA 15213. Copyright © 2002, Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved. 0022-3476/2002/$35.00 + 0 9/21/126603 doi:10.1067/mpd.2002.126603 410 rectal agents.3-5 There is often reluctance by parents and children to use oral agents such as mineral oil, polyethylene glycol electrolyte solutions (PEG-ELS), and magnesium citrate secondary to poor palatability, nausea, and cramping. Enemas using phosphate soda, saline, and mineral oil solutions are commonly used and appear to be effective.3 Unfortunately, repeated administration of enemas is strongly disliked by children and often leads to use of inadequate doses and failure of treatment. PEG Polyethylene glycol Polyethylene glycol solution (PEG) 3350 without added electrolytes (MiraLax, Braintree Labs, Braintree, Mass) is a newly developed, flavorless and odorless osmotic laxative in powder form that is absorbed only in trace amounts from the gastrointestinal tract.6 To date, it has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of chronic constipation only in adults.7 Unlike other colonic lavage solutions, there is no risk for salt absorption.8 The effective dose of PEG 3350 for maintenance treatment of childhood constipation has recently been reported.9 PEG 3350 as an oral agent in the clearance of fecal impaction before maintenance treatment has not been studied in children. METHODS Design The study was designed to test the efficacy and safety of 4 different doses of PEG 3350 in the treatment of fecal YOUSSEF ET AL THE JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS VOLUME 141, NUMBER 3 impaction in children. The design was a prospective, double-blind, parallel study. Patients enrolled were children examined in the pediatric gastroenterology clinic with complaints of chronic constipation and/or soiling and who had a fecal impaction. The primary outcome measure of the study was clearance of fecal impaction. Presence or absence of fecal impaction was assessed by abdominal and rectal examination. Secondary outcome measures included number of bowel movements during the study versus baseline. In addition, we evaluated characteristics of stools in the 4 different dose groups as measured by diaries provided to the parents. Safety was measured by laboratory evaluation of sodium, potassium, chloride, bicarbonate, magnesium, phosphorous, calcium, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, and serum osmolarity, checked before and after treatment. Study Population Only new patients referred to the pediatric gastroenterology clinic for evaluation of constipation with evidence of fecal impaction were enrolled into the study. Patients initially underwent a telephone screen to evaluate the presence of functional fecal retention as defined by the Rome criteria.10 These criteria include difficulty passing stools >3 months (straining, grunting, stool “getting stuck”) and passage of stools <3 times per week. Inclusion Criteria Eligible children for the study were those 3 to 18 years of age, male or female, with no previous gastrointestinal surgery, no allergy/sensitivity to PEG solution or phosphates, and willing to participate in the study. All medications for constipation had to be discontinued 7 days before examination. All children had to have evidence of a fecal impaction defined as a palpable mass in the left lower abdomen and/or a dilated rectum filled with a large amount of hard stool on rectal examination. No patient was enrolled that had signs and Fig 1. Disimpaction response by dose. *P < .005, 1.0 and 1.5 g/kg per day versus 0.25 and 0.5 g/kg per day. symptoms suggestive of obstruction; this included vomiting, abdominal distension, and an abdominal mass that extended beyond the level of the umbilicus. Physical examinations were preformed by two examiners to confirm presence of the fecal impaction. We planned to enroll 10 children in each of 4 dose groups. Baseline Visit At this visit, an informed consent was obtained from parents and assent from children. The initial visit included history, complete physical exam, and assessment of constipation and bowel habits by a scoring system previously used in constipated adults11 (Table available at www.mosby.com/jpeds). The scoring system was used as a tool for evaluation to help quantify historic data as reported by parents and not as a measure of severity of constipation. Diaries aimed at assessing stool characteristics and monitoring symptoms during the study were distributed. The diaries had visual analog scales marked from 0 to 10; each mark evenly spaced 1 cm apart, where 0 was the minimum and 10 was the maximum. In the diaries, children and their parents were asked to report each defecation and its associated straining (0, very easy and no pushing; 1-10, very difficult and much effort), consistency of stool (0, too loose and watery; 1-10, very hard), amount of stool per defecation (0, very little; 1-10, a lot), associated gas (0, none; 1-10, too much), and cramping (0, none; 1-10, very painful). Random Assignment Once entry criteria were met, patients were randomly assigned to receive PEG 3350 in 1 of 4 doses, 0.25 g/kg per day, 0.5 g/kg per day, 1 g/kg per day, or 1.5 g/kg per day for 3 consecutive days. The maximum dose was 100 g daily. All medications were dispensed to families premixed in a solution flavored in orange Crystal Light (Kraft Foods, Inc, Northfield, Ill) in a clear container labeled with only a random sequence number generated by the manufacturer. All containers initially contained PEG 3350: 50 g, 100 g, 200 g, or 300 g. Each container was then constituted to a 2000-mL solution for respective doses of 0.025 g/mL, 0.05 g/mL, 0.1 g/mL, or 0.15 g/mL. Patients then received a dose of 10 mL/kg per day. Patients were given written instructions on the daily amount to be taken and provided with measuring cups. All patients were instructed to take the medication in the morning with breakfast. If the volume exceeded 240 mL, the remaining daily dose was equally divided throughout the remaining meals. Investigators were blinded to the randomization allocation sequence and its concealment was 411 YOUSSEF ET AL THE JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS SEPTEMBER 2002 Table I. Patient data and constipation score Age (y) Sex (male) Weight (kg) Duration (mo) Previous medication (%) Constipation score‡ 0.25 g/kg/day (n = 10) 0.5 g/kg/day (n = 10) 1 g/kg/day (n = 10) 1.5 g/kg/day (n = 10) 7.98 ± 2.5 7 27.3 ± 10.3 36 ± 28 50 10.7 ± 2.6 5.7 ± 1.72* 7 25.7 ± 15.4 33.8 ± 26.2† 70 13 ± 3.7 7.8 ± 2.9 8 26.8 ± 10.6 48.3 ± 24.3 20 9.4 ± 2.7 8.6 ± 2.9 7 37.9 ± 20.1 42 ± 33.2 50 11.5 ± 3.9 *P < .03 versus 1.5 g/kg/day. †P < .04 versus 1 g/kg per day. ‡See Table III, available at www.mosby.com/jpeds. Table II. Stool characteristics and symptoms during treatment PEG 3350 dose Straining Consistency Stool amount Gas Cramping 0.25 g/kg/day 0.5 g/kg/day 1.0 g/kg/day 1.5 g/kg/day 3.1 ± 2.0 4.8 ± 2.2 4.7 ± 2.3 1.8 ± 1.7 1.0 ± 0.7 4.2 ± 3.1 5.6 ± 3.1 3.9 ± 2.5 1.3 ± 0.9 2.4 ± 2.8 2.6 ± 0.7 3.3 ± 0.4 4.1 ± 1.6 1.7 ± 0.7 1.0 ± .37 1.6 + 1.1 2.5 + 1.4 4.2 + 1.7 1.2 + 1.1 0.7 + 1.0 Scores described in Methods section. No significant difference was found in any of the parameters among the 4 groups. maintained until all patients enrolled completed the study and all data had been collected. Patients had access to a physician 24 hours a day during the study. All other medications used for the treatment of constipation had to be discontinued during the study. lower quadrant mass in addition to an empty rectal vault was defined as a successful disimpaction. Clearance of fecal impaction was confirmed by two examiners. The same laboratory evaluation performed at enrollment was repeated. The Human Rights Committee at the Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh approved the study. Follow-up Visit Data Analysis and Interpretation Patients were examined on the 5th day after starting treatment, 48 hours after their last drug dose, to assess outcome of disimpaction, record adverse events, and collect bowel diaries and medication containers. The 5th day after initiation of treatment was chosen because of our previous clinical experience with PEG 3350, which showed an initial effect between 1 and 2 days after beginning the use of the medication. Clearance of fecal impaction was defined as a rectal vault that was either empty or had a small amount of soft stools. In those with abdominal examination findings, resolution of the left In the analysis, only patients who completed the 3-day treatment and returned for follow-up were considered. For all analyses, an effective treatment was defined as clearance of the impaction. Analysis of variance was used to compare continuous outcomes, and the χ2 test was used to compare categoric outcomes. We used the Student t test for paired samples to calculate P values related to laboratory evaluation. The comparison was with values before the start of therapy. All P values are 2-sided, with P value < .05 being considered as statistically significant. Forty-one children fulfilled the inclusion criteria; 40 children (27 male, median age 7.5, range 3.3-13.1 years) completed the study. One child receiving a dose of 1.5 g/kg per day did not show up at the follow-up visit. Overflow fecal soiling occurred in 35 children, with 91% having it daily. Associated symptoms included straining (90%), hard consistency stools (85%), feeling of incomplete evacuation (55%), feeling of blockage (40%), and defecation only achieved using manual maneuvers such as suppositories or enemas (13%). Baseline patient characteristics and constipation scores in the different dose groups are summarized in Table I. At 412 RESULTS YOUSSEF ET AL THE JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS VOLUME 141, NUMBER 3 the time of evaluation, 41 patients had evidence of large amount of hard stool in the rectal vault; 28 of these patients (distributed through all groups) also had evidence of a left lower abdominal mass. Twenty-three patients (58%) were receiving no medications for constipation at time of evaluation. The mean duration of symptoms of constipation was 39.6 months (range 6-120 months). Primary Outcome At follow-up, disimpaction had been achieved in 30 children (75%). Three of 10 patients whose fecal impaction had not cleared on digital rectal examination also had persistent abdominal left lower quadrant fecal mass. There was a significant difference between higher doses (1 and 1.5 g/kg/day) and lower doses (0.25 and 0.5 g/kg/day) in the rate of disimpaction (95% vs 55%, P < .005). Results in each subgroup are shown in Fig 1. Success of disimpaction was not significantly related to the independent factors of age, duration of constipation, current use of medications for constipation, and baseline constipation score. Secondary Outcomes Thirty-three children (83%) had >3 bowel movements during the 5-day study. All doses used led to an increase in the number of stools (Fig 2). It took a mean of 1.89 ± 0.46 days for patients to have their first bowel movement after initiation of treatment. Stool characteristics and associated symptoms in the 4 dose groups during the treatment are reported in Table II. A trend for defecations to be associated with less straining and looser consistency was noted with increasing doses, with no statistical significance noted between the dose groups in any of the stool characteristics. Adverse events included nausea (5%), vomiting (5%), bloating/flatulence (18%), pain/cramping (5%), and loose stools (13%). Diarrhea was more prevalent (P < .02) in the higher dose groups (5 of 20 patients) versus the lower doses (2 of 20 patients). No pa- Fig 2. Number of bowel movements during treatment versus baseline. tient had clinically significant abnormal laboratory values after the use of PEG 3350. Statistical significance was found in serum calcium in the 0.25 g/kg per day group (9.7 mg/dL after treatment vs 9.5 mg/dL before treatment, P < .02). Parents were polled about the acceptance of study medication by their children; 95% of children took PEG 3350 on the first attempt. There were no statistical differences in the mean daily volumes required to take the appropriate study dose between groups: (1) 273 ± 103 mL (range, 140-665 mL); (2) 257 ± 154 mL (range, 150-665 mL); (3) 268 ± 106 mL (range, 170-480 mL); and (4) 379 ± 201 mL (range, 130-620 mL), respectively. All children said that they would repeat a 3-day regimen of PEG 3350 to help treat a future fecal impaction. DISCUSSION In this prospective, double-blind, parallel study we found that children with fecal impaction can be treated effectively and safely with PEG 3350. Doses of 1.0 and 1.5 g/kg per day for 3 days were more effective than lower doses, regardless of age of patients, duration of symptoms, or severity of constipation. The effective doses can be administered in relatively small daily volumes. The use of PEG-ELS–based solutions has become increasingly popular in the treatment of childhood constipation.3,4 The main advantage of PEG 3350 is that it is virtually tasteless and odorless when mixed in solution.7 Studies in adults receiving PEG 3350 showed a significant increase in weekly bowel movement frequency and significant decrease in straining, stool consistency, and laxative use.7 A recent open-label study using PEG 3350 in the treatment of childhood chronic constipation showed an increase in weekly stool frequency, decrease in stool consistency, and decline in weekly soiling events.9 As in our study, Pashankar et al9 required higher than the manufacturers recommended dose of 17 grams daily, reporting that a dose of 0.8 g/kg per day was needed for children to evacuate 2 soft stools per day. In this study, doses up to 36 g of PEG 3350 diluted in 8 ounces of fluid were used over a short term to achieve fecal disimpaction and appeared to be well tolerated without disturbing electrolytes and osmolarity. In our series, >85% of children had episodes of overflow soiling, a common consequence of functional fecal retention. When defecation is delayed purposefully secondary to fear of a painful evacuation, there is an accumulation of hard, difficult-to-pass feces in the rectum, and if not cleared, liquid stools will 413 YOUSSEF ET AL THE JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS SEPTEMBER 2002 begin leak around the rectal mass with negative emotional impact on the child. Frequently, stool retention begins at the time of toilet training, when toddlers may refuse to use the potty because of excessive parental pressure, inappropriate timing, or the decision to “exercise their will.”12 The findings of this study confirm that toilet training is a critical time in the onset of childhood constipation, in view of the mean age of the study patients being 7.5 years with a mean duration of symptoms of over 3 years. Since the clinical presentation of constipation is variable, a scoring system was used at time of the initial visit. The scoring system has been used by other investigators in adult patients to help standardize evaluation.11 We used the system to quantify historic data as reported by children’s parents and not to grade the severity of constipation. The baseline constipation score was not significantly different among the four different dose groups and did not predict those who were successfully disimpacted or those who had more bowel movements, suggesting that adequate doses of PEG 3350 may be effective even in the most severe cases of fecal impaction. Adverse effects related to PEG 3350 were related mostly to its osmotic laxative effect. Families judged side effects as minor and acceptable. Adverse events included nausea, vomiting, bloating and increased flatulence, and abdominal cramping. Bloating and increased flatulence were seen mostly in the higher doses. It is questionable if loose stools in the treatment of consti- pation should be considered a success or an adverse effect since 95% of children on the higher doses were successfully disimpacted safely. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that fecal impaction in children can be treated effectively by PEG 3350. Patients with signs and symptoms suggestive of a fecaloma and possible obstruction such as vomiting, abdominal distension, and abdominal fecal mass that extended beyond the level of the umbilicus were not studied. The most likely mechanism of success of disimpaction is due to the osmotic and stool softening effect of PEG 3350. This leads to more bowel movements that are easier to pass. The most effective doses in this study were in the range of 1.0 to 1.5 g/kg per day with a maximum daily dose of 100 g given for 3 consecutive days. It is likely that PEG 3350 will become the agent of choice in treating childhood constipation during both disimpaction and maintenance phases of treatment because of its effectiveness and patient acceptance. REFERENCES 1. Loening-Baucke V. Chronic constipation in children. Gastroenterology 1993; 105:1057-64. 2. Baker SS, Liptak GS, Colletti RB, Croffie JM, Di Lorenzo C, Ector W, et al. Constipation in infants and children: evaluation and treatment. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1999;29:612-26. 3. Nurko SS, Garcia-Aranda JA, Guerrero VY, Woroma LB. Treatment of in- 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. tractable constipation in children: experience with cisapride. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1996;22:38-44. Ingebo KB, Heyman MB. Polyethylene glycol-electrolyte solution for intestinal clearance in children with refractory encopresis: a safe and effective therapeutic program. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1988;142:340-2. Tolia V, Lin Ch, Elitsur Y. A prospective randomized study with mineral oil and oral lavage solution for treatment of fecal impaction in children. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 1993;7:523-9. Brady CE III, DiPalma JA, Morawski SG, Santa Ana CA, Fordtran JS. Urinary excretion of polyethylene glycol 3350 and sulfate after gut lavage with a polyethylene glycol lavage solution. Gastroenterology 1986;90:1914-8. Di Palma JA, Deridder PH, Orlando RC, Kolts BE, Cleveland MvB. A randomized, placebo controlled, multicenter study of the safety and efficacy of a new polyethylene glycol laxative. Am J Gastroenterol 2000;95:446-50. Hammer HF, Santa Ana CA, Schiller LR, Fordtran JS. Studies of osmotic diarrhea induced in normal subjects by ingestion of polyethylene glycol and lactulose. J Clin Invest 1989;84: 1056-62. Pashankar DS, Bishop WP. Efficacy and optimal dose of daily polyethylene glycol 3350 for treatment of constipation and encopresis in children. J Pediatr 2001;139:428-32. Rasquin-Weber A, Hyman PE, Cucchiara S, Fleisher DR, Hyams JS, Milla PJ, et al. Childhood functional gastrointestinal disorders. Gut 1999;45 (Suppl II):II60-8. Agachan F, Chen T, Pfeifer J, Reissman P, Wexner, SD. A constipation scoring system to simplify evaluation and management of constipated patients. Dis Colon Rectum 1996;39:681-5. Parker PH. To do or not to do? That is the question. Pediatr Ann 1999;28:283-90. You can find additional data from this study by logging onto The Journal of Pediatrics Online at www.mosby.com/jpeds. 414 Table III. Constipation scoring system Score Frequency of bowel movements 1–2 times/1–2 d 2 times/wk 1 time/wk 1 time/wk 1 time/mo Difficulty: painful evacuation Never Rarely Sometimes Usually Always Completeness: feeling of incomplete evacuation Never Rarely Sometimes Usually Always Pain: abdominal pain Never Rarely Sometimes Usually Always Time: minutes in bathroom per attempt 5 5–10 10–20 20–30 >30 Assistance: type of assistance Without assistance Stimulative laxatives Digital assistance or enema Failure: unsuccessful attempts for evacuation/24 h Never 1–3 3–6 6–9 >9 History: duration of constipation (y) 0 1–5 5–10 10–20 >20 0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4
© Copyright 2024