1. business and industrial
2. business operations
3. management
4. project management

AGENDA
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
CITY COUNCIL WORKSHEET
STUDY SESSION
Tuesday, April 15, 2014
6:00 p.m.
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
11707 East Sprague Avenue, First Floor
(Please Silence Your Cell Phones During the Meeting)
DISCUSSION LEADER
SUBJECT/ACTIVITY
GOAL ___________
ROLL CALL:
1. Briahna Taylor
2014 Legislative Update
Discussion/Information
2. Steve Worley
Draft 2015-2020 Six Year Transportation
Plan (TIP)
Discussion/Information
3. Lori Barlow
Comprehensive Plan Amendments
(CPA 2014)
Discussion/Information
4. Scott Kuhta, Erik Lamb
Public Notification Process
Discussion/Information
5. Mayor Grafos
Advance Agenda
Discussion/Information
6. Mayor Grafos
Council Comments
Discussion/Information
7. Mike Jackson
City Manager Comments
Discussion/Information
ADJOURN
Note: Unless otherwise noted above, there will be no public comments at Council Study Sessions. However, Council always reserves the
right to request information from the public and staff as appropriate. During meetings held by the City of Spokane Valley Council, the
Council reserves the right to take “action” on any item listed or subsequently added to the agenda. The term “action” means to deliberate,
discuss, review, consider, evaluate, or make a collective positive or negative decision.
NOTICE: Individuals planning to attend the meeting who require special assistance to accommodate physical, hearing, or other impairments, please contact the City
Clerk at (509) 921-1000 as soon as possible so that arrangements may be made.
Study Session Agenda, April 15, 2014
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: April 15, 2014
Item: Check all that apply:
Department Director Approval
consent
information
old business
admin. report
new business
public hearing
pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE : Legislative Agenda Update
GOVERNING LEGISLATION:
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN:
BACKGROUND:
Lobbyist Briahna Taylor will brief Council tonight on current and pending legislative issues.
OPTIONS:
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION:
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS:
STAFF CONTACT:
___________________________________________________________________________
ATTACHMENTS
Spokane Valley’s 2013-2014 Legislative Agenda
AWC 2014 Legislative Priorities
2013-14 Amended Legislative Agenda
The following is the City of Spokane Valley’s 2013-2014 legislative agenda, adopted by Council at their December 18, 2012
Council meeting, and amended by Council Consensus at their December 10, 2013 meeting:
Appleway Trail Project
Seek $2,000,000 in funding in the 2015-2017 Capital Budget for the development of Phase II of the former Milwaukie Railroad
right-of-way as a unique, two-mile green space and trail in the heart of Spokane Valley’s commercial district. The project is
expected to increase use of the commercial corridor, benefitting the economy and creating new jobs. The project will provide a
much needed route for non-motorized travel along Spokane Valley’s principle east-west commercial arterial, connecting the
Spokane Transit Authority Transit Center, business districts, schools, and medium-high density housing. Community members
have been actively involved in development of a Conceptual Design for the project, which includes: a paved trail, plazas, play
spaces and gathering places, public art, perennial gardens, space for community gardens, mountain bike trail, and lighting and
safety crossings. The current cost estimate for the two-mile portion of Phase II of the Appleway Trail Project (University to
Evergreen) is $2,692,320. Spokane Valley has received grant funding in the amount of $642,852 from Spokane Regional
Transportation Council in their last Call for Projects. The design drawings are 90% complete.
In 2008, the City constructed Phase I which included 1.2 miles of pathway from Corbin Road to the east City limits. If
successful in this funding request, the City would construct Phase II as described above. Phase III would consist of two miles
of trail from Evergreen Road to Corbin Road. The total funds required to complete Phase II and Phase III are estimated at
$5,286,000.
Protect the Local-State Shared Revenues
The City of Spokane Valley encourages the state to preserve local state-shared revenues, and restore funding to those accounts
revised and reduced during the last legislative session. These funds include the Liquor Excise Tax Account, Liquor Board
Profits, Streamlined Sales Tax Mitigation, Municipal Criminal Justice Assistance Account, and City-County Assistance
Account. In 2013, the Legislature permanently reduced local Liquor Excise Tax distributions to cities. In Spokane Valley, this
resulted in approximately a 75% reduction ($437,486 in 2011 to $108,900 in 2014). The Legislature also capped the local
government share of Liquor Board Profits at a fixed rate. The City supports restoring shared Liquor Excise Tax revenues;
restoring growth in local Liquor Board Profits so that cities can share in the increasing liquor revenues; and, protecting and
maintaining funding to other state-share revenue accounts. The City also requests consideration for receiving shared revenues
in any and all new state programs where the City would have operating, enforcement, or financial obligations associated with
the activities of these new programs.
Additional Lien Authority to Recoup Code Enforcement Costs
The City of Spokane Valley seeks legislation to provide cities with additional tools to recoup costs for enforcing code
compliance when a court order has been issued and a city performs the abatement itself or through a contractor. The legislation
would provide cities with the same authority that counties currently have to impose a priority lien on the property, and would
also authorize cities to collect such liens on the following year’s property tax assessment.
Long-Range Legislative Agenda Item
Transportation Project – Barker Road/BNSF Grade Separation
The City of Spokane Valley supports identifying future funding opportunities for the Barker Road/BNSF Grade Separation
project. As the state experiences an increase in rail traffic, this particular intersection will become increasingly congested and
dangerous. This project will separate vehicle traffic from train traffic and remove the at-grade rail crossing. The total anticipated
cost is $26 million. The City has secured $5.2 million from the Washington State Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board
and the project has been identified as regionally significant by the Inland Pacific Hub Study. Long-term, the City is seeking
$21million in future funding for the Barker Road/BNSF Grade Separation. Additional benefits include: Improve the Level of
Service (LOS) of ‘F’ at this intersection, allowing for new development in the industrial-zoned portion of the City; improve
emergency access; and help to address concerns about coal trains, including impeded traffic flow, increased whistle noise, and
train-vehicle conflict safety.
The City supports the Association of Washington Cities’ legislative agenda items that serve the best interests of Spokane
Valley.
Take Action for Cities 2014 Agenda
The key to a
great state is strong cities throughout Washington. Our 281 cities
are the state’s economic engines and where most of the population lives, works, shops and plays.
In 2014, legislators can protect the heart of a great state by taking action to:
•Restore liquor revenue sharing
– The long history of
local/state liquor revenue sharing, a partnership dating 70+ years, has been severely
undermined in recent years. The Legislature must restore the growth in profits that
cities need to fund public safety and other local impacts. Support HB 2314/SB 6361 incrementally restores growth in local liquor profits.
•Fund new city responsibilities from marijuana
legalization – The new marijuana industry is subject to up to a 75% state
excise tax, but none of that funding is directed to local jurisdictions to address public
safety needs and other complex local impacts. Reconcile medical and recreational
marijuana to meet the federal mandate for a tightly-regulated system.
Support HB 2149 - reconciles medical/recreational marijuana.
SSB 5887 – reconcile medical/recreational marijuana and provide funding for cities.
•Fund transportation needs, including
providing new local transportation revenue
options – Transportation is critical for our economic vitality. Cities must have
the resources to maintain and strengthen both local and state transportation systems.
Support SHB 1959, HB 1892 and SHB 1953 – local transportation revenue options.
•Stop raiding infrastructure funds
– Our infrastructure
is aging and cities can’t keep up with increasing demands. If we are going to
keep Washington moving forward, we need the Public Works Trust Fund and other
infrastructure programs intact, to allow for planned and sustained investments in
communities. Support SHB 2244 – restores funding for the Public Works Trust Fund.
January 2014
Contact: Dave Williams • Director of Government Relations • [email protected]
Association of Washington Cities • 1076 Franklin St SE, Olympia, WA 98501 • awcnet.org
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: April 15, 2014
Check all that apply:
consent
information
Department Director Approval:
old business
admin. Report
new business
pending legislation
public hearing
executive session
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Draft 2015 – 2020 Six Year Transportation Improvement Program
(TIP) Discussion of Potential Projects
GOVERNING LEGISLATION:
RCW 35.77.010, Perpetual advanced six-year plans for
coordinated transportation program expenditures.
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN:
11, 2013, Resolution #13-006.
Adopted 2014-2019 Six Year TIP last year on June
BACKGROUND: The City is required by RCW 35.77.010 to prepare and after a public hearing,
adopt a revised and extended comprehensive transportation program for the ensuing six
calendar years. This plan must be adopted by June 30th and submitted to the Washington State
Department of Transportation before July 31st of each year.
To better incorporate City Council priorities in identifying projects for the 2015-2020 TIP, Staff
would like to discuss projects carried over from last year’s TIP, the unfunded projects list, and
any potential projects to add or remove for the proposed 2015-2020 TIP update.
The attached list represents projects from last year’s Six Year TIP. Completed projects have
been removed and recently funded projects have been added. This becomes a starting point
for developing the 2015-2020 Six Year TIP. Based on comments received, staff will prepare a
first draft of the Six Year TIP reflecting Council’s goals and priorities.
Added Projects:
1. Barker Rd Improvement Project, Appleway to I-90
2. Sprague/Long Sidewalk Project – Funding Received from CDBG
3. Sprague/Barker Roundabout – Beginning design with Developer funds.
Rescheduled Projects:
1. Barker/BNSF Grade Separation – Moved up to accommodate TIGER 6 grant obligation
deadline.
2. Fancher/BNSF RR Overpass Bridge Joint Repair Project – CN delayed to 2015 from
2014 to take advantage of BR grant opportunity.
3. Broadway/Argonne/Mullan Concrete Intersection – Delayed to align with potential
STP funding availability.
4. Mission Ave Improvement – Flora to Barker (CN) - Delayed to align with potential
STP funding availability.
5. Appleway Trail Phase 3 – Evergreen to Corbin - Delayed to align with funding
opportunities.
6. Appleway Trail Phase 4 – University to Park/Library Site - Delayed to align with
funding opportunities.
7. Barker Rd Improvement – Spokane River to Euclid – Delayed to align with future
funding opportunities.
8. Park Road #2 Improvement – Broadway to Indiana (RW & CN) - Delayed to align with
future funding opportunities.
OPTIONS: Discuss potential TIP projects and project schedules.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Provide discussion and feedback.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: As the proposed 2015-2020 Six Year TIP evolves, staff will
coordinate with the Finance Department regarding the city’s ability to meet local match grant
requirements for future state and federal grants.
STAFF CONTACT:
Steve Worley, P.E. - Senior Capital Projects Engineer
Eric Guth, P.E. - Public Works Director
___________________________________________________________________________
ATTACHMENTS: 1) Proposed TIP Projects List
2) Projects List with no Current Funding
3) Total Project Cost Report
Draft
2015 - 2020
Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program
Dollars in Thousands
Project / Description / Current Status
1
Argonne Rd Corridor Upgrade- I90 to Trent
Length
PE
RW
CN
Total
0.38
0
0
631
630
Funding
Sources
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
Total
City
CMAQ
None
None
None
None
253
377
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
253
377
0
0
0
0
Project Total
630
0
0
0
0
0
630
City
STP(E)
0
372
0
0
0
0
0
365
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
737
0
0
0
0
Project Total
372
365
0
0
0
0
737
BR
2,852
0
0
0
0
0
2,852
City
FMSIB
Other
Fed
UCP
None
893
1,000
1,945
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
893
1,000
1,945
1,750
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,750
0
Project Total
8,440
0
0
0
0
0
8,440
S
Revise Signal Phasing, Add NB Right Turn Lane at Montgomery, Intersection Improvements at Knox
Funding Secured (SRTC 06-31), City Project #0060
2
Spokane Valley-Millwood Trail - Felts Field to
S Evergreen Rd (PE)
6.5
738
0
0
737
Construct Shared Use Pathway on abandoned Railroad Right-of-way
PE Funded; SRTC #TE10-04; City Project #0145
3
Sullivan Road West Bridge
0.08
0
0
8,440
8,440
S
Reconstruct and widen west (southbound) bridge
Recv'd FMSIB, BR & TIB grants; City Project #0155
Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, and
are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions.
4/7/2014
Page 1
Draft
2015 - 2020
Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program
Dollars in Thousands
Project / Description / Current Status
4
Citywide Safety Improvements
Length
PE
RW
CN
Total
0
0
0
31
31
Funding
Sources
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
Total
0
21
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
21
10
0
0
0
0
0
10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Project Total
31
0
0
0
0
0
31
City
CMAQ
7
46
0
0
0
0
70
445
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
77
491
0
0
0
0
Project Total
53
515
0
0
0
0
568
12
0
422
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
434
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Project Total
12
422
0
0
0
0
434
City
CMAQ
41
260
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
41
260
0
0
0
0
301
0
0
0
0
0
301
City
Other
Fed
Other
Fed
S
Signal, pedestrian, bike & sign retrofit safety improvements
HSIP & QRSP funded; City Project #0167
5
Sidewalk Infill Program - Phase 3
0
28
25
515
568
P
Complete gaps in sidewalk system throughout City, ADA upgrades
6
Sprague / Barker Roundabout
0
0
12
422
434
City
Develop
ers
S
Install Roundabout
PE funded with Developer fees
7
ITS Infill Project
0
0
0
301
301
S
Installs Fiber along University (4th to 16th), Fancher (Sprague to Broadway) and Broadway (Fancher to Park)
CMAQ Funded, City #0201
Project Total
Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, and
are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions.
4/7/2014
Page 2
0
Draft
2015 - 2020
Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program
Dollars in Thousands
Project / Description / Current Status
8
Sprague / Long Sidewalk Project
Length
PE
RW
CN
Total
0.2
0
0
236
236
Funding
Sources
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
Total
City
CDBG
0
236
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
236
0
0
0
0
Project Total
236
0
0
0
0
0
236
2,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2,000
0
0
0
0
0
2,000
City
225
597
1,304
783
0
0
2,909
Other
Fed
UCP
OtherRR
Other
Fed
FMSIB
180
540
0
0
0
0
720
1,419
96
1,255
336
496
620
298
372
0
0
0
0
3,468
1,424
0
3,000
7,500
4,500
0
0
15,000
0
992
2,480
1,488
0
0
4,960
1,920
6,720
12,400
7,441
0
0
28,481
S
Construct new sidwalk along south side of Sprague (Appleway to Arties Ln) and east side of Long (Sprague to school)
CDBG Funded
9
2015 Street Preservation Project
0.26
50
0
1,950
2,000
City
P
Dishman-Mica Resurface - Sands to Thorpe; Euclid Ave Recon - West end of City to Sullivan; Flora Rd Recon - Euclid
to Trent; Madison Rd Recon - 40th to Thorpe; Mission Ave Resurface - Argonne to Herald; Mullan Rd Resurface Broadway to Mission
Project Total
10
Barker Road / BNSF Grade Separation
0
2,000
1,679
24,800
28,481
P
Construct Grade Separation at Barker/BNSF RR/ Trent (SR290)
FY09 Federal Earmark for $720K million, 20% of CN (up to $10M) received from FMSIB
Project Total
Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, and
are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions.
4/7/2014
Page 3
0
Draft
2015 - 2020
Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program
Dollars in Thousands
Funding
Sources
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
Total
City
SRTS
14
83
0
0
0
0
68
436
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
82
519
0
0
0
0
Project Total
97
504
0
0
0
0
601
City
SRTS
5
35
0
0
0
0
56
360
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
61
395
0
0
0
0
Project Total
40
416
0
0
0
0
456
City
CMAQ
14
91
109
700
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
123
791
0
0
0
0
Project Total
105
809
0
0
0
0
914
City
STP(U)
Grind/Overlay; OCI: 32.49
4
26
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
26
0
0
STP Funded
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
30
0
0
0
0
0
30
Project / Description / Current Status
11
Bowdish Sidewalk - 8th to 12th
Length
PE
RW
CN
Total
0.25
64
65
472
601
P
Construct sidewalk along both sides of Bowdish
12
Park Road #1 Sidewalk Project - Sinto Ave. to
P Indiana Ave.
0.44
15
25
416
456
Construct sidewalk along east side of Park Road from 200-ft S. of Sinto to Indiana Ave. and 165-ft gap on Mission Ave.
east of Park Rd
13
Sullivan Corridor ITS - I-90 to Trent (SR 290)
1.75
105
0
809
914
S
Extend ITS conduit and contols along Sullivan Corridor
CMAQ funded, City #
14
Sullivan Road Resurfacing - Broadway to
S Mission
0.17
30
0
0
30
Project Total
Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, and
are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions.
4/7/2014
Page 4
Draft
2015 - 2020
Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program
Dollars in Thousands
Project / Description / Current Status
15
S
Sullivan Road Resurfacing - Sprague to
Broadway
Length
PE
RW
CN
Total
0.5
52
0
788
840
Funding
Sources
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
Total
City
STP(U)
113
727
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
113
727
0
0
0
0
Project Total
840
0
0
0
0
0
840
0
200
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
200
0
0
0
0
200
0
0
0
0
0
200
0
0
2,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2,000
0
0
0
0
2,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,400
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,400
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,400
0
0
0
1,400
Grind/Overlay; OCI: 31.2
STP Funded
16
Fancher/BNSF RR Overpass Joint Repair
P Project
0
29
0
172
200
City
BR
Repair bridge joints on RR overpass
Project Total
17
2016 Street Preservation Project
0
50
0
1,950
2,000
City
P
Appleway Blvd Resurface-Vista to Dishman-Mica; Dishman-Mica Rd Resurface-Thorpe to S City limits; Euclid Ave
Recon-Sullivan to Marietta; Farr Rd Recon-4th to 8th; Progress Rd Recon-Wellesley to Crown
Project Total
18
2017 Street Preservation Project
0
30
0
1,370
1,400
City
P
Euclid Ave Recon-Marietta to Flora; Evergreen Rd Resurface-I90 to Indiana; Farr Rd Recon-Appleway to 4th; Sprague
Ave Resurface-Flora to Corbin; Sprague Ave Resurface-Park to Vista; Sprague Ave Resurface-Sullivan to Conklin
Project Total
Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, and
are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions.
4/7/2014
Page 5
Draft
2015 - 2020
Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program
Dollars in Thousands
Project / Description / Current Status
19
P
Length
PE
RW
CN
Total
0
0
0
2,110
2,110
Broadway @ Argonne/Mullan Concrete
Intersections (CN Only)
Funding
Sources
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
Total
City
STP(U)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
285
1,825
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
285
1,825
0
0
0
0
Project Total
0
0
2,110
0
0
0
2,110
City
STP(U)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
211
1,351
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
211
1,351
0
0
0
0
Project Total
0
0
1,562
0
0
0
1,562
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,400
0
0
0
0
0
1,400
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Project Total
0
0
0
1,400
0
0
1,400
City
CMAQ
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
29
185
0
0
386
2,474
0
0
0
0
0
0
415
2,659
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
214
2,860
0
3,074
Reconstruct intersections in concrete pavement
20
Sullivan / Euclid Concrete Intersection (RW/CN)
0
0
0
1,562
1,562
P
Reconstruct intersection in concrete pavement
21
2018 Street Preservation Project
0
30
0
1,370
1,400
City
P
Appleway(Park to Dishman-Mica); Argonne(Broadway to Indiana)
22
Appleway Trail Phase 3 - Evergreen to Corbin
2.35
214
0
2,860
3,074
P
Construct Shared Use Pathway along abandoned Railroad Right-of-Way
Project Total
Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, and
are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions.
4/7/2014
Page 6
Draft
2015 - 2020
Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program
Dollars in Thousands
Project / Description / Current Status
23
P
Length
PE
RW
CN
Total
0.25
359
0
2,749
3,108
Argonne Road Concrete Pavement - I-90 to
Montgomery
Funding
Sources
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
Total
City
STP(U)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
48
311
0
0
0
0
371
2,378
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
419
2,689
0
0
0
0
Project Total
0
0
0
359
2,749
0
3,108
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
683
2,733
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
683
2,733
0
0
0
0
Project Total
0
0
0
3,416
0
0
3,416
City
STP(E)
0
0
0
0
0
0
14
86
289
1,851
289
1,851
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
592
3,788
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100
2,140
2,140
4,380
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,400
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,400
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,400
0
1,400
Reconstruct pavement in concrete; OCI: 40.35 (2012)
24
Mission Ave. - Flora Rd. to Barker Rd. (CN)
1
0
0
3,416
3,416
City
UAP
P
Widen & Overlay with curb, sidewalks, bike lanes and stormwater facilities
25
Spokane Valley-Millwood Trail - Felts Field to
P Evergreen Rd (RW&CN)
6.5
0
100
4,280
4,380
Construct Shared Use Pathway on abandoned Railroad Right-of-way
Project Total
26
2019 Street Preservation Project
0
30
0
1,370
1,400
City
P
Sullivan (Trent to Wellesley); Evergreen (Mission Connector to Indiana)
Project Total
Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, and
are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions.
4/7/2014
Page 7
Draft
2015 - 2020
Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program
Dollars in Thousands
Project / Description / Current Status
27
P
Appleway Trail Phase 4 - University Rd. to
Balfour Park
Length
PE
RW
CN
Total
0.5
100
400
700
1,200
Funding
Sources
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
68
432
0
0
0
0
94
606
0
0
0
0
162
1,038
0
0
0
0
Project Total
0
0
0
0
500
700
1,200
City
STP(U)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
150
957
0
0
0
0
266
1,702
0
0
0
0
416
2,659
0
0
0
0
Project Total
0
0
0
0
1,107
1,968
3,075
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
114
457
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
114
457
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
571
571
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
81
322
0
0
81
322
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
403
403
City
TA
Extend Shared Use pathway to Balfour Park
28
Barker Rd Improvement Project - Appleway to IP 90
0.28
257
850
1,968
3,075
Widen and improve to 5-lane urban section, Roundabout @ Broadway, Realign east leg of Broadway
29
Barker Rd - Euclid to 0.1 mi. S. of Trent Ave
P (SR290)
0.75
471
100
0
571
City
UAP
Reconstruct Barker to 3-lane urban section
Project Total
30
Barker Rd Improvement Project - Spokane
P River to Euclid
0.53
378
25
0
403
City
UAP
Reconstruct and widen to 3-lane urban section
Project Total
Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, and
are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions.
4/7/2014
Page 8
Draft
2015 - 2020
Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program
Dollars in Thousands
Project / Description / Current Status
31
P
Broadway Improvement Project - Flora to
Barker
Length
PE
RW
CN
Total
0
543
1,000
0
1,543
Funding
Sources
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
309
1,234
0
0
0
0
309
1,234
0
0
0
0
Project Total
0
0
0
0
0
1,543
1,543
City
STP(U)
None
None
None
None
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
20
130
0
0
0
0
388
2,489
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
408
2,619
0
0
0
0
Project Total
0
0
0
150
2,877
0
3,027
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,400
0
1,400
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,400
1,400
15,307
11,751
17,472
13,080
13,633
8,725
79,968
City
UAP
Extend Broadway arterial to Barker Rd, Realign Broadway connection east of Barker
32
Park Road #2 - Broadway to Indiana (RW & CN)
0.75
0
150
2,877
3,027
P
Reconstruct to a 3-lane section with curb, sidewalks, bike lanes and stormwater facilities
33
2020 Street Preservation Project
0
30
0
1,370
1,400
City
P
Project Total
Totals:
5,603
4,431
69,935
79,969
Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, and
are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions.
4/7/2014
Page 9
Draft
2015 - 2020
Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program
Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program Totals
Secured Projects
Year
Federal
State
Other
City
Planned Projects
Total
Federal
State
Totals
Other
City
Total
Federal
State
Other
City
Total
2015
$6,917
$2,750
$0
$1,330
$10,997
$544
$1,419
$96
$2,251
$4,310
$7,461
$4,169
$96
$3,581
$15,307
2016
$1,065
$0
$0
$531
$1,596
$4,781
$2,247
$336
$2,791
$10,155
$5,846
$2,247
$336
$3,322
$11,751
2017
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$10,676
$2,976
$620
$3,200
$17,472
$10,676
$2,976
$620
$3,200
$17,472
2018
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$5,082
$4,519
$372
$2,957
$12,930
$5,082
$4,519
$372
$2,957
$12,930
2019
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$8,092
$0
$0
$2,664
$10,756
$8,092
$0
$0
$2,664
$10,756
2020
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$4,289
$2,013
$0
$2,573
$8,875
$4,289
$2,013
$0
$2,573
$8,875
$7,982
$2,750
$0
$1,861
$12,593
$13,17
4
$1,424
$16,436
$64,498
$1,424
$18,297
$77,091
Total
$33,464
Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, and
are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions.
4/7/2014
Page 1
$41,446
$15,924
City of Spokane Valley
Department of Public Works
Six Year Transportation Improvement Program
Projects w/ No Currently Identified Local Match Within Existing Resources
Dollars in Thousands
Project Name
Description
Total Cost
Bowdish Road - 16th to Sprague
Sprague to 8th: Inlay & Enhancement; 8th to
16th: Reconstruct as 2-lane section w/ curb,
sidewalk, bike lanes and new stormwater facilities
$2,858
Bowdish Road - 24th to 16th
Reconstruct Roadway as 2-lane section w/ curb,
sidewalk and new stormwater facilities;
$2,846
Bowdish Road - 32nd to 24th
Reconstruct Roadway as 2-lane section w/ curb,
sidewalk and new stormwater facilities;
$2,637
Bowdish Sidewalk - 12th to 16th
Construct Sidewalk along both sides of Bowdish
$557
Greenacres Trail - Sullivan to E City
Limits (RW&CN)
Construct Shared Use Pathway on abandoned
railroad right-of-way
Park Road #2 Sidewalk Project Marietta Ave. to Buckeye Ave.
Construct sidewalk along one side of Park Road
and 160-ft gap on north side of Buckeye Ave east
of Park Road
$143
Park Road / BNSF Grade Separation
Reconstruct Park Road to separate the grades of
Park Road and the BNSF railroad tracks.
$16,520
Pavement Management Program Local Access
Annual street preservation projects
$11,664
Pines Corridor ITS - Sprague to 16th
Traffic Signal Control System for Corridor
Pines Rd / BNSF Grade Separation
Construct grade separation at Pines Rd (SR-27) /
Trent Ave (SR 290) / BNSF RR
Saltese/Sullivan Traffic Signal
Improvements to Intersection, Install Traffic
Signal (In coordination w/ Spokane County)
Sprague / Argonne-Mullan Concrete
Intersections
Reconstruct intersections in concrete pavement
$2,342
Sprague / Fancher Concrete
Intersection
Reconstruct Intersection in concrete pavement
$1,572
Sprague / Thierman Concrete
Intersection
Reconstruct intersection in concrete pavement
$1,243
Sprague / University Concrete
Intersection
Reconstruct intersection in concrete pavement.
$1,660
Sullivan / Kiernan Concrete
Intersection
Reconstruct Intersection in concrete pavement
$1,423
Sullivan / Marietta Concrete
Intersection
Reconstruct intersection in concrete pavement
$1,493
Sullivan Rd / BNSF Grade
Separation Improvements
Upgrade and widen grade separation at
Sullivan/BNSF/Trent (SR290)
Sullivan Road North Extension
(Bigelow Gulch)
Reconstruct and widen the Sullivan Road
extension north also known as Bigelow Gulch
Road to a 4-lane roadway with 8-foot shoulders
and a 12-foot two way left turn lane.
$1,095
$785
$45,000
$586
$45,000
$55
Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, and are not
intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions.
Monday, April 07, 2014
Page 1 of 2
City of Spokane Valley
Department of Public Works
Six Year Transportation Improvement Program
Projects w/ No Currently Identified Local Match Within Existing Resources
Dollars in Thousands
Project Name
Wellesley Realignment @
Barker/SR290
Description
Total Cost
Realign connection of Wellesley to Barker Rd and
SR290, 3-lane section, Part of Barker/BNSF
Grade Separation
Totals:
$5,187
$144,666
Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, and are not
intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions.
Monday, April 07, 2014
Page 2 of 2
City of Spokane Valley
Department of Public Works
Total Project Costs
(Including costs before and beyond the six years of this TIP)
Projects Listed by Category for the 2014-2019 Six-Year TIP
Dollars in Thousands
Project Name
Description
City Cost
2020 Street Preservation Project
Total:
Total Cost
$1,400
$1,400
$1,400
$1,400
Arterial Improvements
Project Name
Description
City Cost
Total Cost
Mission Ave. - Flora Rd. to Barker
Rd. (CN)
Widen & Overlay with curb,
sidewalks, bike lanes and
stormwater facilities
$683
$3,416
Barker Rd Improvement Project Appleway to I-90
Widen and improve to 5-lane urban
section, Roundabout @ Broadway,
Realign east leg of Broadway
$416
$3,075
Barker Rd - Euclid to 0.1 mi. S. of
Trent Ave (SR290)
Reconstruct Barker to 3-lane urban
section
$837
$4,184
Barker Rd Improvement Project Spokane River to Euclid
Reconstruct and widen to 3-lane
urban section
$661
$3,302
Broadway Improvement Project Flora to Barker
Extend Broadway arterial to Barker
Rd, Realign Broadway connection
east of Barker
$1,142
$5,706
Park Road #2 - Broadway to Indiana
(RW & CN)
Reconstruct to a 3-lane section with
curb, sidewalks, bike lanes and
stormwater facilities
$418
$3,102
$4,157
$22,785
Total:
Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, and are not
intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions.
Monday, April 07, 2014
Page 1 of 5
City of Spokane Valley
Department of Public Works
Total Project Costs
(Including costs before and beyond the six years of this TIP)
Projects Listed by Category for the 2014-2019 Six-Year TIP
Dollars in Thousands
Bridge Projects
Project Name
Description
City Cost
Total Cost
Sullivan Road West Bridge
Reconstruct and widen west
(southbound) bridge
$2,360
$19,750
Barker Road / BNSF Grade
Separation
Construct Grade Separation at
Barker/BNSF RR/ Trent (SR290)
$2,909
$28,479
Fancher/BNSF RR Overpass Joint
Repair Project
Repair bridge joints on RR overpass
$0
$201
$5,269
$48,430
Total:
Congestion Improvements
Project Name
Description
City Cost
Total Cost
Argonne Rd Corridor Upgrade- I90 to
Trent
Revise Signal Phasing, Add NB
Right Turn Lane at Montgomery,
Intersection Improvements at Knox
$434
$1,550
Sprague / Barker Roundabout
Install Roundabout
$434
$489
$868
$2,039
Total:
Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, and are not
intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions.
Monday, April 07, 2014
Page 2 of 5
City of Spokane Valley
Department of Public Works
Total Project Costs
(Including costs before and beyond the six years of this TIP)
Projects Listed by Category for the 2014-2019 Six-Year TIP
Dollars in Thousands
Pedestrian/Bicycle Program
Project Name
Description
City Cost
Total Cost
Spokane Valley-Millwood Trail - Felts
Field to Evergreen Rd (PE)
Construct Shared Use Pathway on
abandoned Railroad Right-of-way
$0
$745
Sidewalk Infill Program - Phase 3
Complete gaps in sidewalk system
throughout City, ADA upgrades
$88
$655
Sprague / Long Sidewalk Project
Construct new sidwalk along south
side of Sprague (Appleway to Arties
Ln) and east side of Long (Sprague
to school)
$13
$283
Bowdish Sidewalk - 8th to 12th
Construct sidewalk along both sides
of Bowdish
$82
$601
Park Road #1 Sidewalk Project Sinto Ave. to Indiana Ave.
Construct sidewalk along east side of
Park Road from 200-ft S. of Sinto to
Indiana Ave. and 165-ft gap on
Mission Ave. east of Park Rd
$61
$456
Appleway Trail Phase 3 - Evergreen
to Corbin
Construct Shared Use Pathway
along abandoned Railroad Right-ofWay
$415
$3,074
Spokane Valley-Millwood Trail - Felts
Field to Evergreen Rd (RW&CN)
Construct Shared Use Pathway on
abandoned Railroad Right-of-way
$592
$4,380
Appleway Trail Phase 4 - University
Rd. to Balfour Park
Extend Shared Use pathway to
Balfour Park
$162
$1,200
$1,413
$11,394
Total:
Safety Program
Project Name
Citywide Safety Improvements
Description
City Cost
Signal, pedestrian, bike & sign
retrofit safety improvements
Total:
Total Cost
$0
$674
$0
$674
Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, and are not
intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions.
Monday, April 07, 2014
Page 3 of 5
City of Spokane Valley
Department of Public Works
Total Project Costs
(Including costs before and beyond the six years of this TIP)
Projects Listed by Category for the 2014-2019 Six-Year TIP
Dollars in Thousands
Street Preservation Projects
Project Name
Description
2015 Street Preservation Project
Dishman-Mica Resurface - Sands to
Thorpe; Euclid Ave Recon - West
end of City to Sullivan; Flora Rd
Recon - Euclid to Trent; Madison Rd
Recon - 40th to Thorpe; Mission Ave
Resurface - Argonne to Herald;
Mullan Rd Resurface - Broadway to
Mission
Sullivan Road Resurfacing Broadway to Mission
City Cost
Total Cost
$2,000
$2,000
Grind/Overlay; OCI: 32.49
$43
$316
Sullivan Road Resurfacing - Sprague
to Broadway
Grind/Overlay; OCI: 31.2
$113
$840
2016 Street Preservation Project
Appleway Blvd Resurface-Vista to
Dishman-Mica; Dishman-Mica Rd
Resurface-Thorpe to S City limits;
Euclid Ave Recon-Sullivan to
Marietta; Farr Rd Recon-4th to 8th;
Progress Rd Recon-Wellesley to
Crown
$2,000
$2,000
2017 Street Preservation Project
Euclid Ave Recon-Marietta to Flora;
Evergreen Rd Resurface-I90 to
Indiana; Farr Rd Recon-Appleway to
4th; Sprague Ave Resurface-Flora to
Corbin; Sprague Ave Resurface-Park
to Vista; Sprague Ave ResurfaceSullivan to Conklin
$1,400
$1,400
2018 Street Preservation Project
Appleway(Park to Dishman-Mica);
Argonne(Broadway to Indiana)
$1,400
$1,400
2019 Street Preservation Project
Sullivan (Trent to Wellesley);
Evergreen (Mission Connector to
Indiana)
$1,400
$1,400
$8,356
$9,356
Total:
Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, and are not
intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions.
Monday, April 07, 2014
Page 4 of 5
City of Spokane Valley
Department of Public Works
Total Project Costs
(Including costs before and beyond the six years of this TIP)
Projects Listed by Category for the 2014-2019 Six-Year TIP
Dollars in Thousands
Street Reconstruction Projects
Project Name
Description
City Cost
Total Cost
Broadway @ Argonne/Mullan
Concrete Intersections (CN Only)
Reconstruct intersections in concrete
pavement
$285
$2,110
Sullivan / Euclid Concrete
Intersection (RW/CN)
Reconstruct intersection in concrete
pavement
$211
$1,562
Argonne Road Concrete Pavement I-90 to Montgomery
Reconstruct pavement in concrete;
OCI: 40.35 (2012)
$419
$3,108
$915
$6,780
Total:
Traffic Operations and Maintenance
Project Name
Description
ITS Infill Project
Installs Fiber along University (4th to
16th), Fancher (Sprague to
Broadway) and Broadway (Fancher
to Park)
Sullivan Corridor ITS - I-90 to Trent
(SR 290)
Extend ITS conduit and contols
along Sullivan Corridor
City Cost
Total:
Overall Total:
Total Cost
$45
$327
$123
$914
$168
$1,241
$22,546
$104,099
Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, and are not
intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions.
Monday, April 07, 2014
Page 5 of 5
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: April 15, 2014
Item: Check all that apply:
Department Director Approval
consent
information
old business
admin. report
new business
public hearing
pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Proposed 2014 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendments Overview
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 36.70A, SVMC 17.80.140 and 19.30.010
PREVIOUS ACTION TAKEN: None
BACKGROUND:
Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) 17.80.140 establishes an annual comprehensive plan
amendment cycle that runs from November 2nd to November 1st of the following year. The
Planning Commission considers applications during the following spring, with a decision by City
Council generally occurring in late spring/early summer.
The Community Development Department received two privately initiated requests for sitespecific Comprehensive Plan amendments. In addition, the City is proposing one site-specific
Comprehensive Plan amendment. Sites approved for a Comprehensive Plan amendment receive
a zoning classification consistent with the new land use designation.
The Comprehensive Plan text amendments include amendments to six Comprehensive Plan
Elements: Chapter 2 - Land Use, Chapter 3 – Transportation, Chapter 4 – Capital Facilities and
Public Services, Chapter 6 – Private and Public Utilities, Chapter 7 – Economic Development, and
Chapter 11 - Bike and Pedestrian. The proposed amendments may also entail minor changes to
other elements referencing the proposed amendments.
Staff presented the proposed amendments to the Planning Commission at a study session on
February 13, 2014. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the amendments on
February 27, 2014 and continued the hearing to the March 13th meeting. Following deliberations,
the Planning Commission took the following actions:
CPA 01-14 (Mirabeau Park) – voted to recommend that Council deny the specific map
amendment;
CPA 02-14 (SCRAPS - Bradley Road) – voted to recommend that Council deny resulted in a
tie, as a result the motion failed. This is being forwarded without a recommendation;
CPA 03-14 (Barker and Sprague) – voted to recommend that Council deny the specific map
amendment;
CPA 04-14 through CPA 08-14 – voted to recommend approval of the text amendments;
CPA 09-14 – text amendment regarding parks and recreation: withdrawn by staff; and
CPA 10-14: voted to recommend approval of the text amendment.
1 of 2
PUBLIC NOTICE:
Notice for the proposed amendments was placed in the Spokane Valley News Herald on
February 7, 2014 and each site was posted with a “Notice of Public Hearing” sign, which
described the proposal. Individual notices of the proposals were mailed to all property owners
within 400 feet of each proposed amendment.
SEPA REVIEW:
Pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA – chapter 43.21C RCW), environmental
checklists were required for each proposed amendment. Under SEPA, amendments to a
comprehensive plan are considered “non-project actions” defined as actions involving decisions
on policies, plans, or programs that contain standards controlling use or modification of the
environment. Additional environmental review may be required for the physical development of
the subject properties.
Staff reviewed the environmental checklists and a threshold determination was made for each
proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment. Determinations of Non-significance (DNS) were
issued for the proposed amendments on February 7, 2014 consistent with SVMC 21.20.070.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT PROPOSALS:
Proposed amendments to the Comprehensive plan are organized into individual reports
consisting of staff reports, maps, and comments submitted to date to assist the City Council in its
review.
OPTIONS: Consensus to proceed with process, including holding a public hearing at the May 6
Council meeting.
STAFF CONTACT: Lori Barlow, AICP, Senior Planner
ATTACHMENTS:
1) PowerPoint Presentation
2) Written Comments from Pinecroft Business Park –dated March 31, 2014
3) See separate yellow notebook: contents include 2014 Comprehensive Plan
amendments with individual Staff Reports, Planning Commission Meeting
minutes, and comments received.
Please note that the yellow notebooks will be used throughout this entire process,
and at the end of the process they should be returned to Community Development
for use in subsequent year’s Comprehensive Plan amendments.
2 of 2
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DIVISION
Proposed 2014 Comprehensive
Plan Amendments
April 15, 2014
Proposed 2014 Comprehensive
Plan Amendments
1
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DIVISION
Comprehensive Planning
The Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan (SVCP)
is the City’s guide for growth and development.
• Residential
• Industrial
• Commercial
• Office
• Recreation
Infrastructure
• Roads
• Sewer
• Water
• Utilities
Land Use
Proposed 2014 Comprehensive
Plan Amendments
• Buildings
• Services
• Financing
Capital
Facilities
2
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DIVISION
SVCP Amendment Process
Docket
Legislative
Appeals
• City Council approves official docket
• November 1st cut off for applications (60-day notice)
• Planning Commission recommendation
• City Council approval
• Growth Management Hearing Board
Proposed 2014 Comprehensive
Plan Amendments
3
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DIVISION
City-Initiated Map Amendment
Project Number
CPA-01-14
Applicant:
City of Spokane Valley
11707 East Sprague Ave, Suite 106
Spokane Valley, WA 99206
Application
Description
Change City-owned parcel 45101.9068 from Parks/Open
Space to Mixed Use Center
Proposed 2014 Comprehensive
Plan Amendments
4
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Proposed 2014 Comprehensive
Plan Amendments
DIVISION
5
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Proposed 2014 Comprehensive
Plan Amendments
DIVISION
6
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Proposed 2014 Comprehensive
Plan Amendments
DIVISION
7
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DIVISION
CPA-01-13
E
Proposed 2014 Comprehensive
Plan Amendments
8
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DIVISION
Comprehensive Land Use Designations
Proposed 2014 Comprehensive
Plan Amendments
9
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DIVISION
Zoning Designations
Proposed 2014 Comprehensive
Plan Amendments
10
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DIVISION
Fish & Wildlife Habitat Map
Amendment Site
Located in Urban Natural Open Space
Proposed 2014 Comprehensive
Plan Amendments
11
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DIVISION
Issues Discussed at Public Hearing
• Open space = valuable asset
• Irregular lot size and shoreline setbacks create
development challenges
• Potential Centennial Trail and view impacts
Proposed 2014 Comprehensive
Plan Amendments
12
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DIVISION
PC Recommendation
• Motion to forward CPA-01-14 to City
Council with a recommendation to
deny
• Motion passed 5-1
Proposed 2014 Comprehensive
Plan Amendments
13
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DIVISION
Privately Initiated Map Amendment
Project Number
CPA-02-14
Applicant:
Spokane County Regional Animal
Protection Services (SCRAPS)
2521 North Flora Road
Spokane Valley, WA 99216
Change parcel 35124.0813 from Low Density
Residential to Corridor Mixed Use
Application Description
Proposed 2014 Comprehensive
Plan Amendments
14
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Proposed 2014 Comprehensive
Plan Amendments
DIVISION
15
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Proposed 2014 Comprehensive
Plan Amendments
DIVISION
16
DIVISION
CPA-01-13
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Proposed 2014 Comprehensive
Plan Amendments
17
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DIVISION
Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designations
Proposed 2014 Comprehensive
Plan Amendments
18
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DIVISION
Zoning District Designations
Proposed 2014 Comprehensive
Plan Amendments
19
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DIVISION
Issues Discussed at Public Hearing
• Allows high density development to encroach
into Low Density Residential zone
• Inconsistent with neighborhood character
• Vacant property serves as buffer
• Regional facility – community need
Proposed 2014 Comprehensive
Plan Amendments
20
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DIVISION
PC Recommendation
• Motion to forward CPA-02-14 to City
Council with a recommendation to
deny
• Motion Tied 3-3
• Forwarded with no recommendation
Proposed 2014 Comprehensive
Plan Amendments
21
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DIVISION
Privately Initiated Map Amendment
Project Number
CPA-03-14
Applicant(s):
Whipple Consulting Engineers, Inc.
Property Owner(s):
Teresa and Wendell Olsen
Application Description
Change parcel 55173.1005 from Low Density
Residential Designation to High Density
Residential Designation
Proposed 2014 Comprehensive
Plan Amendments
22
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DIVISION
CPA-03-14
Proposed 2014 Comprehensive
Plan Amendments
23
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DIVISION
CPA-03-14
Proposed 2014 Comprehensive
Plan Amendments
24
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Looking south
Looking north
CPA-01-13
DIVISION
Looking west from Barker
Proposed 2014 Comprehensive
Plan Amendments
Looking west from Nixon
25
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DIVISION
CPA-03-14
Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designations
Proposed 2014 Comprehensive
Plan Amendments
26
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DIVISION
CPA-03-14
Zoning District Designations
Proposed 2014 Comprehensive
Plan Amendments
27
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DIVISION
Issues Discussed at Public Hearing
• Impacts: Increased traffic, noise, potentially
crime, overcrowded schools
• Create an island of LDR property
• Demand for single family housing – conversion of
underutilized lot is consistent with the Comp Plan
• Not consistent with the neighborhood character
• Too far from Appleway and commercial services
Proposed 2014 Comprehensive
Plan Amendments
28
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DIVISION
PC Recommendation
• Motion to forward CPA-03-14 to City
Council with a recommendation to
deny
• Motion passed unanimously
Proposed 2014 Comprehensive
Plan Amendments
29
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DIVISION
City-Initiated Text Amendments
CPA
04-14
Land
Use
• Update land capacity analysis and growth projections
• Current /20 yr. estimated pop = 91,940/106,831
• Land Capacity = 14,891 persons
• Add Goal and policies to support infill development in
Residential zones
• Remove City Center land use scenario, land use
designation, and all associated goals and policies
PC Recommendation:
• Motion to forward CPA-04-14 to City Council with a recommendation to
approve as presented
• Motion passed unanimously
Proposed 2014 Comprehensive
Plan Amendments
30
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DIVISION
City-Initiated Text Amendments
CPA-05-14
Transportation
• Remove City Center section
• Update Map 3.1 Arterial
Street Plan
PC Recommendation:
• Motion to forward CPA-05-14 to City Council with a recommendation to
approve as presented
• Motion passed unanimously
Proposed 2014 Comprehensive
Plan Amendments
31
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DIVISION
City-Initiated Text Amendments
CPA-06-14
Capital Facilities
• Update six-year Transportation
Improvement Program
• Update City capital projects to reflect
Council policy direction and approved
financial plans
PC Recommendation:
• Motion to forward CPA-06-14 to City Council with a recommendation to
approve as presented
• Motion passed unanimously
Proposed 2014 Comprehensive
Plan Amendments
32
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DIVISION
City-Initiated Text Amendments
CPA-07-14
Private and
Public Utilities
• Remove reference to City
Center Plan Concept
PC Recommendation:
• Motion to forward CPA-07-14 to City Council with a recommendation to
approve as presented
• Motion passed unanimously
Proposed 2014 Comprehensive
Plan Amendments
33
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DIVISION
City-Initiated Text Amendments
CPA-08-14
Economic
Development
• Remove reference to City Center
Plan Concept
• Update Development Activity Map
PC Recommendation:
• Motion to forward CPA-08-14 to City Council with a recommendation to
approve as presented
• Motion passed unanimously
Proposed 2014 Comprehensive
Plan Amendments
34
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DIVISION
City-Initiated Text Amendments
CPA-09-14
Parks and
Recreation
•Withdrawn by Staff
Proposed 2014 Comprehensive
Plan Amendments
35
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DIVISION
City-Initiated Text Amendments
CPA-10-14
Bike &
Pedestrian
• Include 2012 bike and pedestrian
improvements
• Add proposed shared use path along Barker
PC Recommendation:
• Motion to forward CPA-10-14 to City Council with a recommendation to
approve as presented
• Motion passed unanimously
Proposed 2014 Comprehensive
Plan Amendments
36
March 31, 2014
Mayor Deaan Grafos
Deputy Maayor Arne Woo
odward
Mr. Rod Higgins
H
Mr. Ed Pacce
Mr. Charlees “Chuck” Hafner
Mr. Ben Wick
W
Mr. Bill Baates
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
V
Via Email:: citycouncil@
@spokanevalley
y.org
Re:
City
C of Spokanee Valley 2014 Comprehensiv
C
ve Plan Amenddment CPA-011-14
Gentleman
n:
I write thiss letter to urge you
y to approvee the City of Sp
pokane Valleyy (COSV) stafff initiated CPA--01-14 change to the
comprehen
nsive plan.
I am the prroperty manageer and leasing agent
a
for the Pinecroft
P
Businness Park. Pineecroft owns thee majority of thhe
land and th
he buildings ad
djacent to tax parcel 45101.90
068 as shown oon the attachedd site plan. Currrently the Pineecroft
Business Park
P
is home to
o approximately
y 350,000 squaare feet of officce and flex-offfice/manufactuuring/warehouse
space. At last count the 20+
2 businessess located at Pin
necroft employy 1,200+ peoplee. Vacancy is low and we aree
working on
n several projects in the busin
ness park that will
w increase ouur size and em
mployee count.
The three most
m common requests that I receive from my
m customers aat Pinecroft incclude:
1. When
W
will we have on-site foo
od service?
2. When
W
will a trafffic light be insstalled at Piness & Mirabeau P
Parkway?
3. When
W
will STA provide bus seervice through the business ppark?
ve looked at op
pening a food service
s
businesss at Pinecroft.. They have feelt the best placce to
Several enttrepreneurs hav
open such a business wou
uld be at the eaast end of the Pinecroft
P
Businness Park so they can serve booth Pinecroft bbut
de service to ussers of the Cen
ntennial Trail an
nd patrons of M
Mirabeau Poinnt Park. Pineccroft, LLC is
also provid
interested in
i obtaining tax
x parcel 45101
1.9068 so it can
n be developedd to provide foood service, com
mmunity spacee and
parking forr the area.
Please con
ntact me with an
ny questions.
Sincerely,
MMERCIAL REAL ESTAT
TE, LLC
JMA COM
Property Manager/Leas
M
sing Agent forr Pinecroft, LL
LC
Jamie M. Traeger,
T
CCIM
M, CPM®
Cc:
Mike
M Jackson – City of Spokane Valley
Approve CPA-01-14
Tax Parcel 45101.9068
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: April 15, 2014
Check all that apply:
consent
information
Department Director Approval
old business
admin. report
new business
public hearing
pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Public Participation and Public Notice Requirements for
Comprehensive Plan Updates and Amendments
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 36.70A, RCW 36.70B, SVMC 17.80
PREVIOUS ACTION TAKEN: N/A
BACKGROUND: City Council requested a review of the City’s adopted Public Participation
Guidelines and notice requirements for Comprehensive Plan updates, Comprehensive Plan
annual amendments, and land use applications.
Comprehensive Plan Updates and Annual Amendments. RCW 36.70A.140 of the Growth
Management Act (GMA) requires local jurisdictions to “establish and broadly disseminate to the
public a public participation program…providing for early and continuous public participation in
the development of (and amendments to) comprehensive plans”. State law does not require
individual notice for comprehensive plan updates and annual amendments. The City adopted its
Public Participation Program in September, 2003, consistent with recommendations of the GMA
(see attached).
Land Use Applications (e.g., zone amendments). In 1995, the Washington State Legislature
adopted the Local Project Review Act (RCW 36.70B), which directs local jurisdictions to
streamline and integrate permit and environmental review processes. The law also established
maximum time limits for application review and comment. Specifically, the Local Project
Review Act requires the City to use “reasonable methods to give the notice of application to the
public….” In compliance with the provisions of RCW 36.70B, the City adopted Permit
Processing Procedures in SVMC 17.80, which include specific requirements for public notice,
depending on the permit type (see attached).
One key requirement of the Local Project Review Act is a Notice of Application for certain
permit types, such as subdivisions, variances, conditional uses, zone map amendments and
shoreline permits. The Notice of Application provides information on the project proposal, how
people can provide public comment and staff contact information. The Notice of Application is
sent to the applicant, all adjacent property owners, and all parties requesting notice.
Under SVMC 17.80, land use application permits that require a public hearing, such as
subdivisions and zone changes, require the following notice at least 15 days prior to the hearing:
1. Notice by mail to:
a. Property owners within 400 feet of subject property.
b. Agencies with jurisdiction (water, sewer, fire, etc.)
c. Entities which the City has executed an interlocal agreement.
1 of 2
d. Other persons affected by the proposal or who have requested notice.
2. Notice by sign posted on subject property.
3. Notice by publication in newspaper.
SVMC 17.80 further requires the City to follow the same notice procedures for Comprehensive
Plan annual amendments, except a Notice of Application is not required.
Text amendments to the SVMC are not site specific, so notice for public hearings are distributed
to the applicant (if privately initiated), the newspaper and posted at City Hall and the main
library branch.
OPTIONS: Discussion only.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: N/A
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------STAFF CONTACT: Scott Kuhta, Planning Manager, Erik Lamb, Deputy City Attorney
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Public Participation Guidelines
2. SVMC 17.80 – Permit Processing Procedures
3. 400’ notice examples
2 of 2
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Public Participation Program
RCW 36.70A.140 of the Washington Growth Management Act requires that each city “establish
and broadly disseminate to the public a public participation program … for early and continuous
public participation in the development” of the city’s Comprehensive Plan.
Consistent with the recommendations of the GMA which emphasize the involvement of the
broadest cross-section of the community, including the involvement of groups not previously
involved, the City of Spokane Valley adopts the following program for citizen participation in the
planning process:
1. Visioning Process – This process provides Spokane Valley citizens an opportunity to
establish a framework and context upon which the comprehensive plan will be based.
Planning Commission meetings will provide the forum for the initial community visioning
process. A draft “Vision” will be tested for consistency during the development of the
Plan as the community identifies priorities and implementation strategies and updated
accordingly. The ultimate “Vision” will be established at the conclusion of the planning
process as a result of community participation.
2. Planning Commission. The Planning Commission will play a key role in establishing the
City’s dialogue with community members, hosting a series of meetings and workshops
during the development of the Plan. The Planning Commission will evaluate information
provided by the community and develop recommendations for submission to the City
Council.
3. Citizen Survey – The City will conduct a statistically valid survey of the citizens of
Spokane Valley. Survey questions will address specific issues of the comprehensive
plan that will provide city staff, planning commission and city council with meaningful
input for development of the comprehensive plan.
4. Public Meetings.
Conduct a series of public meetings hosted by the Planning
Commission on the preliminary draft comprehensive plan. This ensures that the City will
meet the requirement for “early and continuous” public participation in the
comprehensive planning process.
5. Public hearings. A series of Public Hearings (not less than three) will be held before the
Planning Commission to discuss the draft Plan. It is anticipated that at least two public
hearings will be held by the governing body prior to adoption of the Plan. An additional
public hearing will be held if substantive changes are made to the Plan document.
6. Public notice. The City will provide notice of all meetings and hearings pursuant to the
requirements of RCW 36.70A.020, .035, and .140.
8-13-2003
Adopted by Council 9-23-2003
1
7. Written Comment. The public will be invited to submit written comments as each
element of the Plan is developed, as part of any workshops or community meetings.
Comments will be specifically solicited from residents, special interest organizations and
business interests. Comments may be in the form of letters and other correspondence
to the city regarding the plan or comments received electronically on the city’s website.
Log in all written comments received according to specific area of comprehensive plan.
8. Communications Programs & Informational Services – As staff and budgetary resources
allow, the activities will be undertaken to ensure broad-based citizen participation:
a. Comprehensive Plan newsletter – updating the community on planned meetings,
workshops or other significant comprehensive plan events. Articles on topics related to
the plan and a request for feedback from the community on topics related to the plan.
The newsletter will be disseminated via the city’s website, emailed to a mailing list and/or
provided in paper copy as appropriate.
b. Interest Groups – Contact local interest groups (i.e. Chamber of Commerce, home
builders, environmental, neighborhoods, etc.) and arrange to meet and discuss relevant
comprehensive plan issues.
c. Community Workshops – Conduct community workshops hosted by the Planning
Commission in different parts of the city to encourage neighborhood participation in the
development of the comprehensive plan. These meetings will be held at neighborhood
schools, churches or other community facilities.
d. Press Releases & Public Service Announcements – Work with the local newspapers,
radio stations and televisions stations to advertise and promote significant events related
to the comprehensive plan.
e. Provide written articles to local media for publication.
f. Establish a Speaker’s Bureau through the Planning Commission which will be
available to address service clubs and interested citizen groups.
g. Develop a database of interested citizens and provide regular correspondence
concerning the status of Plan development.
h. Identify key resource personnel representing agencies and groups whose plans will
be integrated into the Comprehensive Plan, including but not limited to fire districts,
utilities, libraries and school districts.
i. Maintain a log of all public participation meetings, events and actions that the city
engages in to provide documentation on the city’s effort to meet the requirements of the
GMA.
8-13-2003
Adopted by Council 9-23-2003
2
Spoiolne VaileyM",icipai Code
41312014
Chapter 17.80
PERMIT PROCESSING PROCEDURES
Sections:
17.80.010
PUipose and applicability.
17.80.020
Types of dewlopment applications.
17.80.030
Assignment of dewlopment application classification.
17.80.040
Exempt acti'lities.
17.80.050
Dewlopment application requirements.
17.80.060
Final decision authority.
17.80.070
Required application procedures.
17.80.080
Pre-application conference.
17.80.090
Counter-complete determination.
17.80.100
Fully complete determination.
17.80.110
Notice of application.
17.80.120
Notice of public hearing.
17.80.130
Final decision.
17.80.140
Type IV applications - Comprehensiw Plan amendments, dewlopment agreements
associated with a Comprehensiw Plan amendment, and area·wide rezones.
17.80.150
Type IV applications - Text amendments to the uniform dewlopment code.
17.80.160
Optional consolidated re'liew process.
I CompileTitle I
17.80.010 Purpose and applicability.
A. Purpose. The pUipose of this chapter is to establish standardized decision-making procedures for
re'liewing dewlopment and land use applications within the City. This chapter is intended to:
1. Assure prompt re'liew of dewlopment applications;
2. Pro'lide for necessary public re'liew and comment on dewlopment applications;
3. Minimize adwrse impacts on surrounding land uses;
4. Encourage flexibility and innowtion in the design and layout of dewlopment proposals; and
5. Ensure consistency with the Comprehensiw Plan and dewlopment regulations.
B. Applicability. This chapter applies to all dewlopment applications identified in the SVMC. (Ord. 07015 § 4, 2007).
17.80.020 Types of development applications.
Land use and dewlopment applications will be classified as follows:
A. Type I procedures apply to permits and decisions issued administratiwly;
B. Type II procedures apply to administratiw actions that contain some discretionary criteria;
htIp:ll'Mwi.codBI'Jblishirg.can'WA/spolene<.elley.hIn1
1/16
Spoiolne VaileyM",icipai Code
41312014
C. Type III procedures apply to quasi-judicial permits and actions that contain discretionary approval
criteria;
D. Type IV procedures apply to legislativa matters. Legislativa matters inloOlva the creation, reloision, or
large-scale implementation of public policy;
E. Exempt applications defined in SVMC 17.80.040. (Ord. 07-015 § 4, 2007).
17.80.030 Assignment of development application classification.
A. Assignment by Table. Land use and devalopment applications shall be classified pursuant to the
following table:
Table 17.80-1 - Permit Type and Land Use Application
Type
Land Use and Development Application
Accessory dwelling units
Administrativa determinations by community devalopment director,
SVMC Cross-Reference
19.40.100
Multiple
public works director, or building official
Administrativa exception
Administrativa interpretation
Boundary line adjustments and eliminations
Building permits not subject to SEPA
19.140
17.50.010
20.80
21.20.040
Floodplain devalopment
21.30
Grading permits
24.50
Type I
Home occupation permit
Minor modifications of devalopment agreements
19.40.140
19.30.015(1)
Record of survay to establish lots within a binding site plan
20.60.040
Right-of-way permits
22.130.100
Shoreline permit exemption (dock permit)
21.50
Site plan reloiew
19.130
Temporary use permit
19.160
lime extensions for preliminary subdiloision, short subdiloision or
20.30.060
binding site plan
Alterations - Preliminary and final subdiloisions, short subdiloisions,
20.50
binding site plans
Type II
Binding site plan - Preliminary and final
20.50
Binding site plan - Change of conditions
20.50
SEPA threshold determination
21.20.060
Shoreline substantial devalopment permit
21.50
Short subdiloision - Preliminary and final
20.30, 20.40
htIp:ltv.wN.codBI'Jblishirg.can'WA/spolene<.elley.hIn1
2116
Spoiolne VaileyM",icipai Code
41312014
Preliminary short
subdi~sion,
binding site plan - Change of conditions
Wireless communication facilities
22.120
Conditional use permits
19.150
Planned residential dewlopments
19.50
Plat wcation
Type III
20.30
20.70.020
Preliminary subdi~sion - Change of conditions
20.50
Subdi~sions
20.30
- Preliminary
Variance
Type IV
19.170
Zoning map amendments (site-specific rezones)
19.30.030
Annual Comprehensiw Plan amendments (text and/or map)
17.80.140
Area-wide zoning map amendments
17.80.140
Dewlopment agreements associated with Comprehensiw Plan
17.80.140
amendments
Dewlopment code text amendments
17.80.150
B. Assignment by Director. Land use and dewlopment applications not defined in SVMC Table 17.80-1
shall be assigned a type by the director, unless exempt under SVMC 17.80.040. When one or more
procedure may be appropriate, the process pro~ding the greatest opportunity for public notice shall be
followed. (Ord. 10-004 § 1, 2010; Ord. 09-033 § 1, 2009; Ord. 09'()10 § 1, 2009; Ord. 07-015 § 4,2007).
17.80.040 Exempt activities.
A. Exemptions. Unless specified elsewhere in this title, the following dewlopment acti~ties are exempt
from the procedural requirements of this chapter:
1. Normal or emergency repair or maintenance of public or priwte buildings, structures,
landscaping, or utilities.
2. A change of any legally established use is exempt; unless the change of use requires:
a. An increase in the number of parking spaces
pro~ded;
b. A conditional use permit under Chapter 19.150 SVMC;
c. A site plan approwl under Chapter 19.130 SVMC; or
d. Re~ew by SEPA.
3. Final
subdi~sions,
short
subdi~sions,
and binding site plans.
4. Building permits that are not subject to SEPA.
5. On-site utility permits not obtained in conjunction with a speCific dewlopment application
including, but not limited to, sewer hook-ups, water hook-ups, right-of-way permits, and fire
department permits.
6. Sign permits.
htIp:ll'Mwi.codBI'Jblishirg.can'WA/spolene<.elley.hIn1
3116
Spoiolne VaileyM",icipai Code
41312014
7. Interior remodeling and tenant improwments unless site plan re\iew is required under Chapter
19.130 SVMC.
B. Other Regulations. Applications exempt under this section remain subject to all other applicable
standards and requirements of the SVMC. (Ord. 07-015 § 4,2007).
17.80.050 Development application requirements.
A. Application Forms. All applications shall be made on forms pro\ided by the department. The director
shall haw authority to modify application materials.
B. Submittal Information. All applications shall include the information required in applicable pro\isions
of this code as identified in SVMC Table 17.80-2 and other additional information required by the
department.
C. Fees. Fees as required by Chapter 17.110 SVMC. (Ord. 07-015 § 4, 2007).
17.80.060 Final decision authority.
The final decision for application type shall be made by:
A. Type I - the department.
B. Type II - the department.
C. Type III - the hearing examiner.
D. Type IV - the city council preceded by a recommendation by planning commission. (Ord. 07-015 § 4,
2007).
17.80.070 Required application procedures.
The required procedures for Type I, II, and III applications are set forth in the following table. The specific
procedures required for Type IV applications are set forth in SVMC 17.80.140 and 17.80.150.
Table 17.80-2 - Permit Type and Land Usa Application
Pre-
Counter-
Fully
Notice of
Notice of
Final
Application
application
complete
complete
application
public
decision
Type
conference
determination determination
17.80.110
hearing
and notice
17.80.080
17.80.090
17.80.120
17.80.130
17.80.100
I
0
X
X
N/A
N/A
X
'II
"0
X
X
X
N/A
X
III
X
X
X
X
X
X
X Required
o Optional
NlA Not Applicable
'Does not apply to SEPA threshold determinations. Refer to SVMC 21.20.070(B)(2) for noticing
requirements.
"Except for short subdi\isions and binding site plans which require a pre-application meeting.
(Ord. 09-010 § 1,2009; Ord. 07-015 § 4, 2007).
htIp:ll'Mwi.codBI'Jblishirg.can'WA/spolene<.elley.hIn1
4116
41312014
Spoiolne VaileyM",icipai Code
17.80.080 Pre-application conference.
A. Purpose. To pr01lide the City and other agency staff with a sufficient lewl of detail about the proposed
dewlopment; to enable staff to adloise the applicant of applicable approvals and requirements; to
acquaint the applicant with the applicable requirements of the SVMC and other laws; and to identify
issues and concems in advance of a formal application.
B. Pre-Application. Type II and III applicants shall schedule a pre-application conference and proloide
information requested in advance of the meeting.
C. Pre-Application Waiwrs. The director may waiw the pre-application conference if determined that the
proposal has few dewlopment-related issues, imolws subsequent phases of an approwd dewlopment,
or is substantially similar to a prior proposal affecting substantially the same property. (Ord. 07-015 § 4,
2007).
17.80.090 Counter-complete determination.
A. Determination and Application Content. Prior to accepting an application, the department shall
determine whether the application is counter-complete. A counter-complete application shall contain all
information requested in the applicable form. Reloiew for counter-complete status does not include an
evaluation of the substantiw adequacy of the information in the application.
B. Incomplete Application. Ifthe department determines that the application is not counter-complete,
the application shall be rejected and the applicant adloised of the information needed to complete the
application.
C. Counter-Complete Application. Counter-complete applications shall be accepted for reloiew for fully
complete determination. (Ord. 07-015 § 4, 2007).
17.80.100 Fully complete determination.
A. Determination. Once a counter-complete application has been accepted, the department shall, within
28 calendar days, proloide a written determination deliwred by mail or in person to the applicant that the
application is fully complete, or if incomplete, a list of what is required to make the application
complete. The names of agencies of local, state, or federal gowmments that may haw jurisdiction owr
some aspect of the application to the extent known by the City will be proloided to the applicant.
B. Incomplete Application. Ifthe necessary information is not proloided by the applicant within 60 days,
the department shall:
1. Reject and retum the application;
2. Issue a decision denying the application, based on a lack of information. The applicant may
reinitiate the fully complete reloiew process without additional fees; proloided, that the required
information is proloided by a date specified by the department; or
3. The applicant may withdraw the application by submitting a request in writing and may be
entitled to the retum of up to 80 percent of the fees submitted.
C. Fully Complete Application. If the department determines that any application is fully complete, the
department shall, within 14 calendar days, issue a notice of application pursuant to SVMC 17.80.110.
htIp:l_.codBI'Jblishirg.can'WA/spolene<.elley.hIn1
5116
Spoiolne VaileyM",icipai Code
41312014
D. Request for Additional Infonnation. A fully complete detennination shall not preclude the City from
requesting additional infonnation, studies or changes to submitted infonnation or plans if new
infonnation is required or substantial changes to the proposal occur.
E. Re\Ocation. An application's fully complete and wsting status may be re\Oked if the department
detennines that the applicant intentionally submitted false infonnation.
F. Within 14 calendar days after an applicant has submitted additional infonnation identified by the City
as necessary for a complete application, the City shall notify the applicant whether the application is
complete or what additional infonnation is necessary. (Ord. 07-015 § 4, 2007).
17.80.110 Notice of application.
A. Contents. Within 14 calendar days after an application is detennined fully complete, the department
shall issue a notice of application.
1. All notices of applications shall include the following:
a. The case file number(s), the date of application, and the date a fully complete application
was filed;
b. A description of the proposed project and a list of project penn its included with the
application, as well as the identification of other penn its not included in the application, to the
extent known to the City;
c. The proposed SEPA threshold detennination, if applicable;
d. The identification of any existing enllironmental documents that may be used to evaluate the
proposed project;
e. A statement of the public comment period; a statement that the public has the right to
comment on the application, receiva notice of the decision, and request a copy of the decision
once made, and a statement of any appeal rights;
f. The name of the applicant or applicant's authorized representativa and the name, address,
and telephone number of a contact person for the applicant, if any;
g. A description of the site, including current zoning and nearest road intersections, sufficient
to infonn the reader of its location and zoning;
h. A map showing the subject property in relation to other properties or a reduced copy of the
site plan;
i. The date, place, and times where infonnation about the application may be examined and
the name and telephone number of the City representativa to contact about the application;
and
j. Any additional infonnation detennined appropriate by the department.
2. In addition to the requirements listed in subsection (A)(1) of this section, a Type II notice of
application shall state:
htIp:ll'Mwi.codBI'Jblishirg.can'WA/spolene<.elley.hIn1
e/16
Spoiolne VaileyM",icipai Code
41312014
a. That failure of any party to address the relewnt approwl criteria with sufficient specificity
may result in the denial of the application;
b. That all evidence relied upon by the department to make the decision shall be contained
within the record and is awilable for public review, and that copies can be obtained at a
reasonable cost from the department;
c. That after the comment period closes, the department shall issue a Type II notice of
decision.
3. In addition to the requirements listed in subsection (A)(1) of this section, a Type III application
shall state:
a. That a staff report will be awilable for inspection at least sewn days before the public
hearing, and written comments may be submitted at any time prior to the closing of the record
for the public hearing.
B. Distribution of Notice of Application. The notice of application shall be published in an appropriate
regional or neighborhood newspaper or trade joumal and sent to the following persons by regular mail:
1. The applicant;
2. All adjacent property owners of record as shown on the most recent property tax assessment
roll;
3. Any gowmmental agency entitled to notice; and
4. Any person filing a written request for a copy of the notice of application.
c.
Type I Exception. A notice of application is not required for Type I applications.
D. Comment Period. The department shall allow 14 calendar days for Type II applications and 30
calendar days for Type III applications after the date the notice of application is mailed and posted on
the subject property, for individuals to submit comments. Within sewn calendar days after the close of
the public comment period, the department shall mail to the applicant a copy of written public
comments, including e-mail communications timely receiwd in response to the notice of application
together with a statement that the applicant may submit a written response to these comments within
14 calendar days from the date the comments are mailed. The department, in making this decision,
shall consider written comments timely receiwd in response to the notice of application and timely
written responses to those comments, including e-mail communications, submitted by the applicant.
(Ord. 07-{)15 § 4, 2007).
17.80.120 Notice of public hearing.
A public hearing is required for Type III applications.
A. Content of Notice of Public Hearing. Notices of public hearing shall contain the following information:
1. The application and/or project number;
2. Project summal)'/description of each project permit application;
htIp:ll'Mwi.codBI'Jblishirg.can'WA/spolene<.elley.hIn1
7/16
Spoiolne VaileyM",icipai Code
41312014
3. The designation of the hearing body;
4. The date, time, and place of the hearing and a statement that the hearing will be conducted in
accordance with the rules of procedure adopted by the hearing body;
5. General project location, "';cinity, address, and parcel number(s), if applicable;
6. The name of the applicant or applicant's authorized representatiw and the name, address and
telephone number of a contact person for the applicant, if any;
7. The SEPA threshold determination, or description thereof, shall be contained in the notice, along
with any appropriate statement regarding any shared or di"';ded lead agency status and phased
re"';ew and stating the end of any final comment period;
8. A statement regarding the appeal process; and
9. The date when the staff report will be available and the place and times where it can be
re"';ewed.
B. Distribution of Notices of Public Hearing. Notices of public hearing shall be mailed, posted, and
published at least 15 days prior to the hearing date and shall be distributed as follows:
1. Notice by Mail. All property owners within 400 feet of the subject property by first class mail.
Where any portion of the property abutting the subject property is owned, controlled, or under the
option of the project property owner, then all property owners within a 400-foot radius of the total
ownership interest shall be notified by first class mail. Property owners are those shown on the
most recent Spokane County assessor's/treasurer's database as obtained by the title company no
more than 30 calendar days prior to the scheduled public hearing. In addition, notice shall be sent
to the following:
a. Agencies with jurisdiction (SEPA);
b. Municipal corporations or organization with which the City has executed an interlocal
agreement; and
c. Other persons who the City determines may be affected by the proposed action or who
requested such notice in writing.
2. Notice by Sign. A sign a minimum of 16 square feet (four feet in width by four feet in height) in
area shall be posted by the applicant on the site along the most hea"';ly trawled street adjacent to
the subject property. The sign shall be pro"';ded by the applicant. The sign shall be constructed of
material of sufficient weight and reasonable strength to withstand normal weather conditions. The
sign shall be lettered and spaced as follows:
a. A minimum of two-inch border on the top, sides, and bottom of the sign;
b. The first line in four-inch letters shall read "Notice of Public Hearing";
c. Spacing between all lines shall be a minimum of three inches; and
d. The text of the sign shall include the following information in three-inch letters:
htIp:liwNN.codepubiishirg.com'WA/spolenewlley.hIn1
8116
Spoiolne VaileyM",icipai Code
41312014
i. Proposal;
ii. Applicant;
iii. File number;
iv. Hearing (date and time);
v. Location; and
1.1. Re1Aew authority.
3. Notice by Publication. Publish one notice in an appropriate regional or neighborhood newspaper
or trade joumal. (Ord. 07-{)15 § 4, 2007).
17.80.130 Final decision.
A. limeline to Make Final Decision - Type I. The department shall approw, approw with conditions, or
deny a Type I application within 60 calendar days after the date the application was accepted as fully
complete, unless accompanied by a SEPA checklist. lime spent by the applicant to re1Ase plans or
pro101de additional studies or materials requested by the City shall not be included in the 60-<lay period.
An applicant may agree in writing to extend the time in which the department shall issue a decision.
The department's decision shall address all of the relewnt approwl criteria applicable to the
dewlopment application.
B. limeline to Make Final Decision - Type II and III. The final decision on a Type II and III application
shall be made not more than 120 calendar days (90 days for subdi1Asions) after the date a fully complete
determination is made. This period shall not include:
1. lime spent by the applicant to re1Ase plans or pro101de additional studies or materials requested
by the City;
2. lime spent preparing an en1Aronmentai impact statement;
3. lime between submittal and resolution of an appeal; or
4. Any extension of time mutually agreed upon by the applicant and the City in writing.
C. Contents of Final Decision. The final decision on Type II and III applications shall contain the following
information:
1. The nature of the application in sufficient detail to apprise persons entitled to notice of the
applicant's proposal and of the decision;
2. The address or other geographic description of the subject property, including a map of the site
in relation to the surrounding area, where applicable;
3. The date the decision shall become final, unless appealed;
4. A statement that all persons who haw standing under Chapter 17.90 SVMC may appeal the
decision;
5. A statement in boldface type briefly explaining how an appeal can be filed, the deadline for filing
htIp:ll'Mwi.codBI'Jblishirg.can'WA/spolene<.elley.hIn1
51'16
Spoiolne VaileyM",icipai Code
41312014
such an appeal, and where further infonnation can be obtained conceming the appeal;
6. A statement that the complete case file, including findings, conclusions, decisions and
conditions of approval, if any, is available for review. The notice of final decision shall list the place,
days, and times where the case file is available and the name and telephone number of the City
representatiw to contact about reviewing the case file;
7. A statement of the facts demonstrating how the application does or does not comply with
applicable approval criteria;
8. A statement of the basis of decision pursuant to the SVMC and other applicable law;
9. The reasons for a conclusion to approw, approw with conditions, or deny the application;
10. The decision to approw or deny the application and, if approloed, conditions of approval
necessary to ensure the proposed dewlopment will comply with applicable law; and
11. The date the final decision is mailed.
D. Notice of the Final Decision. All final decisions shall be sent by regular mail to the following:
1. The applicant;
2. Any gowmmental agency entitled to notice;
3. Any person filing a written request for a copy of the notice of application or the final decision;
and
4. Any person who testified at the hearing or who provided substantiw written comments on the
application during the public comment period and provided a mailing address. (Ord. 07-015 § 4,
2007).
17.80.140 Type IV applications - Comprehensive Plan amendments, development
agreements associated with a Comprehensive Plan amendment, and area-wide
rezones.
A. Initiation. Comprehensiw Plan amendments and area-wide rezones may be initiated by any of the
following:
1. Property owner(s) or their representatiws;
2. Any citizen, agency, neighborhood association, or other party; or
3. The department, planning commission, or city council.
B. Applications. Applications shall be made on fonns provided by the City.
C. Application Submittal.
1. Applicant Initiated. Comprehensiw Plan amendments and area-wide rezones shall be subject to
a pre-application conference, counter-complete, and fully complete detenninations pursuant to
SVMC 17.80.080, 17.80.090, and 17.80.100. The date upon fully complete detennination shall be
htIp:ll'Mwi.codBI'Jblishirg.can'WA/spolene<.elley.hIn1
1G'16
Spoiolne VaileyM",icipai Code
41312014
the date of registration with the department.
2. Non-Applicant Initiated. After submittal of a non-applicant-initiated application, the application
shall be placed on the register.
D. Register of Comprehensiw Plan Amendments and Area-Wide Rezones. The department shall
establish and maintain a register of all applications.
E. Concurrent and Annual Review of Register.
1. Sixty days prior to Nowmber 1st in each calendar year, the City shall notify the public that the
amendment process has begun. Notice shall be distributed as follows:
a. Notice published in an appropriate regional or neighborhood newspaper or trade journal;
b. Notice posted on all of the City's official public notice boards; and
c. Copy of the notice sent to all agencies, organizations, and adjacent jurisdictions with an
interest.
2. All registered applications shall be reviewed concurrently, on an annual basis and in a manner
consistent with RCW 36.70A.130(2). Applications registered after Nowmber 1st of the previous
calendar year and before Nowmber 1st of the current calendar year shall be included in the annual
review. Those registered after Nowmber 1st ofthe calendar year shall be placed on the register for
review at the following annual review.
3. Emergency Amendments. The City may review and amend the Comprehensiw Plan when the
city council determines that an emergency exists or in other circumstances as provided for by
RCW 36.70A.130(2)(a).
F. Notice of Public Hearing. Comprehensiw Plan amendments and area-wide rezones require a public
hearing before the planning commission.
1. Contents of Notice. A notice of public hearing shall include the following:
a. The citation, if any, of the provision that would be changed by the proposal along with a brief
description of that provision;
b. A statement of how the proposal would change the affected provision;
c. A statement of what areas, Comprehensiw Plan designations, zones, or locations will be
directly affected or changed by the proposal;
d. The date, time, and place of the public hearing;
e. A statement of the awilability of the official file; and
f. A statement of the right of any person to submit written comments to the planning
commission and to appear at the public hearing of the planning commission to giw oral
comments on the proposal.
2. Distribution of Notice. The department shall distribute the notice pursuant to SVMC
htIp:ll'Mwi.codBI'Jblishirg.can'WA/spolene<.elley.hIn1
11/16
Spoiolne VaileyM",icipai Code
41312014
17.80.120(6).
G. Planning Commission Recommendation - Procedure. Following the public hearing, the planning
commission shall consider the applications concurrently, and shall prepare and forward a
recommendation of proposed action for all applications to the city council. The planning commission
shall take one of the following actions:
1. If the planning commission determines that the proposal should be adopted, it may, by a
majority \Ote, recommend that the city council adopt the proposal. The planning commission may
make modifications to any proposal prior to recommending the proposal to city council for
adoption. If the modification is substantial, the planning commission must conduct a public hearing
on the modified proposal;
2. If the planning commission determines that the proposal should not be adopted, it may, by a
majority \Ote, recommend that the city council not adopt the proposal; or
3. If the planning commission is unable to take either of the actions specified in subsection (G)(1)
or (2) of this section, the proposal will be sent to city council with the notation that the planning
commission makes no recommendation.
H. Approval Criteria.
1. The City may approva Comprehensiva Plan amendments and area-wide zone map amendments
if it finds that:
a. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety,
welfare, and protection of the enloironment;
b. The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of Chapter 36.70A RCW and
with the portion of the City's adopted plan not affected by the amendment;
c. The proposed amendment responds to a substantial change in conditions beyond the
property owner's control applicable to the area within which the subject property lies;
d. The proposed amendment corrects an obloious mapping error; or
e. The proposed amendment addresses an identified deficiency in the Comprehensiva Plan.
2. The City must also consider the following factors prior to approloing Comprehensiva Plan
amendments:
a. The effect upon the physical enloironment;
b. The effect on open space, streams, rivars, and lakes;
c. The compatibility with and impact on adjacent land uses and surrounding neighborhoods;
d. The adequacy of and impact on community facilities including utilities, roads, public
transportation, parks, recreation, and schools;
e. The benefit to the neighborhood, City, and region;
htIp:ll'Mwi.codBI'Jblishirg.can'WA/spolene<.elley.hIn1
12116
Spoiolne VaileyM",icipai Code
41312014
f. The quantity and location of land planned for the proposed land use type and density and the
demand for such land;
g. The current and projected population density in the area; and
h. The effect upon other aspects of the Comprehensiw Plan.
I. City Council Action. Within 60 days of receipt of the planning commission's findings and
recommendations, the city council shall consider the findings and recommendations of the commission
conceming the application and may hold a public hearing pursuant to council rules. The department
shall distribute notice of the council's public hearing pursuant to SVMC 17.80.120(B). All annual
amendments to the Comprehensiw Plan shall be considered concurrently. By a majority \Ote of its
membership, the city council shall:
1. Approw the application;
2. Disapprow the application;
3. Modify the application. If the modification is substantial, the council must either conduct a public
hearing on the modified proposal; or
4. Refer the proposal back to the planning commission for further consideration.
J. Transmittal to the State of Washington. At least 60 days prior to final action being taken by the city
council, the Washington State Department of Community, Trade and Economic Dewlopment (CTED)
shall be pro'Jided with a copy of the amendments in order to initiate the 60-day comment period. No later
than 10 days after adoption ofthe proposal, a copy of the final decision shall be forwarded to CTED.
(Ord. 10-{)04 § 2, 2010; Ord. 07-{)15 § 4, 2007).
17.80.150 Type IV applications - Text amendments to the uniform development code.
A. Initiation. Text amendments to this code may be initiated by any of the following:
1. Property owner(s) or their representatiws;
2. Any citizen, agency, neighborhood association, or other party; or
3. The department, planning commission, or city council.
B. Applications. Applications shall be made on forms pro'Jided by the City.
C. Application Submittal.
1. After submittal of an applicant-initiated application, the application shall be subject to a preapplication conference, counter-complete determination, and fully complete determination pursuant
to SVMC 17.80.080, 17.80.090, and 17.80.100.
2. After submittal, the application shall be placed on the next available planning commission
agenda.
D. Notice of Public Hearing. Amendments to this code require a public hearing before the planning
commission.
htIp:ll'Mwi.codBI'Jblishirg.can'WA/spolene<.elley.hIn1
13116
Spoiolne VaileyM",icipai Code
41312014
1. Contents of Notice. A notice of public hearing shall include the following:
a. The citation, if any, of the proloision that would be changed by the proposal along with a brief
description of that proloision;
b. A statement of how the proposal would change the affected proloision;
c. The date, time, and place of the public hearing;
d. A statement of the awilability of the official file; and
e. A statement of the right of any person to submit written comments to the planning
commission and to appear at the public hearing of the planning commission to giw oral
comments on the proposal.
2. Distribution of Notice. The department shall distribute the notice to the applicant, newspaper,
City Hall and the main branch ofthe library.
E. Planning Commission Recommendation - Procedure. Following the public hearing, the planning
commission shall consider the proposal and shall prepare and forward a recommendation to the city
council. The planning commission shall take one of the following actions:
1. If the planning commission determines that the proposal should be adopted, it may, by a
majority \Ote, recommend that the city council adopt the proposal. The planning commission may
make modifications to any proposal prior to recommending the proposal to city council for
adoption. If the modification is substantial, the planning commission must conduct a public hearing
on the modified proposal;
2. If the planning commission determines that the proposal should not be adopted, it may, by a
majority \Ote, recommend that the city council not adopt the proposal; or
3. If the planning commission is unable to take either of the actions specified in subsection (E)(1)
or (2) of this section, the proposal will be sent to city council with the notation that the planning
commission makes no recommendation.
F. Approwl Criteria. The City may approw amendments to this code if it finds that:
1. The proposed amendment is consistent with the applicable proloisions of the Comprehensiw
Plan; and
2. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relation to public health, safety, welfare, and
protection of the enloironment.
G. City Council Action. Within 60 days of receipt of the planning commission's findings and
recommendations, the city council shall consider the findings and recommendations of the commission
conceming the application and may hold a public hearing pursuant to council rules. The department
shall distribute notice of the council's public hearing pursuant to SVMC 17.80.120(B). By a majority
\Ote, the city council shall:
1. Approw the application;
htIp:ll'Mwi.codBI'Jblishirg.can'WA/spolene<.elley.hIn1
14116
Spoiolne VaileyM",icipai Code
41312014
2. Disapprow the application;
3. Modify the application. If modification is substantial, the council must either conduct a public
hearing on the modified proposal; or
4. Refer the proposal back to the planning commission for further consideration.
H. Transmittal to the State of Washington. At least 60 days prior to final action being taken by the city
council, the Washington State Department of Community, Trade and Economic Dewlopment (CTED)
shall be pro'lided with a copy of the amendments in order to initiate the 60-day comment period. No later
than 10 days after adoption ofthe proposal, a copy of the final decision shall be forwarded to CTED.
(Ord. 09-{)10 § 1, 2009; Ord. 07-{)15 § 4,2007).
17.80.160 Optional consolidated review process.
A. Optional Consolidated Re'liew Process. This optional process pro'lides for the consideration of all
discretionary land use, engineering, and en'lironmental permits issued by the City if requested in writing
from the applicant. Permit decisions of other agencies are not included in this process; but public
meetings and hearings for other agencies may be coordinated with those of the City. Where multiple
approvals are required for a single project, the optional consolidated re'liew process is composed of the
following:
1. Pre-Application Meeting. A single pre-application meeting will be conducted for all applications
submitted under the optional consolidated re'liew process.
2. Determination of Completeness. When a consolidated application is deemed complete, a
consolidated determination of completeness will be made pursuant to SVMC 17.80.100.
3. Notice of Application. When a consolidated application is deemed complete, a consolidated
notice of application will be issued pursuant to the pro'lisions of SVMC 17.80.110.
4. Comment Period. The consolidated application shall pro'lide for one comment period for all
permits included in the consolidated application.
5. The City will issue a decision(s) for Type I or Type II permits prior to scheduling a public hearing
for any companion Type III permit. Appeals of administratiw permits that are part of a consolidated
application will be heard in a single, consolidated open record appeal hearing before the hearing
examiner on the same agenda as the companion Type III application.
6. Notice of Public Hearing. A single notice of public hearing will be pro'lided for consolidated
permit applications. The notice will include the Type III permit to be heard and any open record
appeals of administratiw portions of the consolidated application.
7. Notice of Decision. The hearing examiner shall issue a single notice of decision regarding all
Type I and Type II appeals and all Type III project permit applications subject to a public hearing.
(Ord. 07-{)15 § 4, 2007).
htIp:ll'Mwi.codBI'Jblishirg.can'WA/spolene<.elley.hIn1
15116
Spolane Valley Mlricipal Code
Th. Spokan. V.I..y Municipal Cod. is curr.nt through
Ordin.nc. No. 14.(J02, .,.•••d February 11, 2014.
Disclaimer: The City Clerk's Office has the official 'version of the
Spokane ValleyM.micipal Code. Users should contact the City
Clerk's Ofrice for ordinances passed subsequent to the
ordinance cited abow.
http://YMw.codeptbIisting.cariWAls~ley. J-trrj
1&'16
M
is
si
on
Bolivar
Co n
n ect
io n
Indi
ana
Re
es
I 90
Rees
Marcus
Sharp
Best
Sharp
I 90
Miss
ion
Bannen
Bolivar
Sinto
400 ft buffer notice example
93 parcels affected
Sullivan
Warren
Calvin
Rees
Boone
Progress
Cat
ald
o
Ravalli
St Charles
Bannen
Calvin
Cataldo
Warren
Bolivar
Adams
Desmet
Best
Mallon
Mallon
Mallon
Ravalli
Burns
li
val
Ra
Broadway
Broadway
Broadway
Broadway
Progress
Alki
Lucille
Best
Legend
400ft buffer
Sommer
Olive
Rees
Bannen
Alki
Adams
Alki
Alki
Parcels
Sullivan
Springfield
Springfield
Drummond
Jac
ks
on
Long
t
Mon
e ry
gom
Barker
Montgomery
Mansfield
lk
Riverwa
Ri
ve
rw
ay
iver
Shannon
r
ive
Greenacres
76 parcels affected
R
Salmon
Long
R
ake
Sn
Knox
nde
Rio Gra
Eden
400 ft buffer notice example
Michielli
r
Tschirley
Flat
Rock
River
Indiana
lm
Sa
li
iel
ch
i
M
Indiana
Indiana
ve
on
Harmony
Ri
Snake River
on
ann
Sh
Baldwin
on
lm
Barker
a
ian
Ind
Corbin
Augusta
Sandusky
River
Maxwell
Barker
Greenacres
Long
Arties
Maxwell
Mission
Legend
Mission
Mission
Mission
Maxwell
400ft buffer
Parcels
Holiday
Augusta
Rio G
ran
de
Po
tom
ac
Harmony
Drummond
McKee
Greenacres
Long
an
ill
cM
M
Augusta
r
ve
Ri
in
dw
Bal
Baldw
in
Nora
Sa
Corbin
Allan
DRAFT
ADVANCE AGENDA
For Planning Discussion Purposes Only
as of April 9, 2014; 1:30 p.m.
Please note this is a work in progress; items are tentative
To:
Council & Staff
From: City Clerk, by direction of City Manager
Re:
Draft Schedule for Upcoming Council Meetings
April 22, 2014, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m.
[due Mon, April 14]
Proclamation: National Drug Endangered Children Awareness Day
1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes)
(5 minutes)
2. Second Reading Ordinance 14-004 Adopting Findings of Fact, Marijuana Regulations – E Lamb (15 minutes)
3. Proposed Resolution 14-004 Appleway Trail Grant – Mike Stone
(10 minutes)
4. Motion Consideration: Bid Award, Adams Road Resurfacing, 4th to Sprague – Steve Worley (10 minutes)
5. Admin Report: Noxious Weeds Board Assessment – Cary Driskell
(15 minutes)
6. Admin Report: Gender Identity and Public Restrooms – Cary Driskell
(10 minutes)
7. Admin Report: Advance Agenda
(5 minutes)
8. Info Only: (a) Appleway Landscaping Phase 1; (b) Dept Monthly Reports [*estimated meeting: 70 minutes]
April 29, 2014, No Meeting
May 6, 2014, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m.
[due Mon, April 28]
ACTION ITEMS
1. PUBLIC HEARING: Comprehensive Plan Amendments – Lori Barlow
(~120 minutes)
NON-ACTION ITEMS
2. Advance Agenda
(5 minutes)
3. Info Only: (a) Stormwater Effectiveness Studies Consultant Agreement; (b) Stormwater
CIP 2015-2020
[*estimated meeting: 125 minutes]
May 13, 2014, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m.
[due Mon, May 5]
1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes)
(5 minutes)
2. Motion Consideration: Bid Award Appleway Landscaping, Phase 1 – Eric Guth
(15 minutes)
3. Motion Consideration: Stormwater Effectiveness Studies Consultant Agreement – Eric Guth (15 minutes)
4. Admin Report: Comp Plan Amendments (CPA 2014) Admin Report – Lori Barlow
(40 minutes)
5. Admin Report: Advance Agenda
(5 minutes)
[*estimated meeting: 80 minutes]
May 20, 2014, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m.
[due Mon, May 12]
ACTION ITEMS:
1. Motion Consideration: Proceed with Comprehensive Plan Amendments – Lori Barlow
(20 minutes)
NON-ACTION ITEMS:
2. Admin Report: Stormwater CIP 2015-2020 – Eric Guth
(20 minutes)
3. Draft 2015-2020 Six Year TIP – Steve Worley
(15 minutes)
4. Advance Agenda
(5 minutes)
[*estimated meeting: 60 minutes]
May 27, 2014, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m.
[due Mon, May 19]
1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes)
(5 minutes)
2. First Reading Proposed Ordinance, Comp Plan Amendments – Lori Barlow
(15 minutes)
3. First Reading Proposed Ordinance, Comp Plan Map – Lori Barlow
(10 minutes)
4. Admin Report: Advance Agenda
(5 minutes)
5. Info Only: Department Monthly Reports
[*estimated meeting: 35 minutes]
Draft Advance Agenda 4/10/2014 10:34:53 AM
Page 1 of 2
June 3, 2014, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m.
1. Advance Agenda
[due Mon, May 26]
(5 minutes)
June 10, 2014, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m.
[due Mon, June 2]
1. PUBLIC HEARING: Proposed 2015-2020 Six Year TIP – Steve Worley
2. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes)
(5 minutes)
3. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance, Comp Plan Amendments – Lori Barlow
(15 minutes)
4. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance, Comp Plan Map – Lori Barlow
(10 minutes)
5. Admin Report: Advance Agenda
(5 minutes)
[*estimated meeting: 35 minutes]
June 17, 2014: Budget Workshop, 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m.
Spokane Valley City Council Chambers
[due Mon, June 9]
No evening meeting June 17, 2014
June 18-20, 2014 AWC Annual Conference, Spokane Convention Center
June 24, 2014, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m.
[due Mon, June 16]
1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes)
(5 minutes)
2. Proposed Resolution Adopting 2015-2020 Six Year TIP – Steve Worley
(15 minutes)
3. Admin Report: Advance Agenda
(5 minutes)
4. Info Only: Department Monthly Reports
[*estimated meeting: minutes]
July 1, 2014, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m.
1. Advance Agenda
[due Mon, June 23]
(5 minutes)
July 8, 2014, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m.
1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes)
2. Admin Report: Advance Agenda
[due Mon, June 30]
(5 minutes)
(5 minutes)
July 15, 2014, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m.
1. Advance Agenda
[due Mon, July 7]
(5 minutes)
July 22, 2014, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m.
1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes)
2. Admin Report: Advance Agenda
3. Info Only: Department Monthly Reports
[due Mon, July 14]
(5 minutes)
(5 minutes)
July 29, 2014, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m.
1. Advance Agenda
[due Mon, July 21]
(5 minutes)
OTHER PENDING AND/OR UPCOMING ISSUES/MEETINGS:
Street Vacation/Connectivity Process
ADA Transition Plan
Urban Agriculture (animals, bees, etc.)
Centennial Trail Agreement
CDBG (Comm Dev Block Grants) [Sept 2014]
Coal/Oil Train Environmental Impact Statement
*time for public or Council comments not included
Economic Incentives
Fire and Life Safety Code
Future Acquisition Areas
Historic Preservation
Interim Marijuana Regulations [expire Aug 11, 2014]
SEPA/NEPA Process – Eric Guth
Stormwater Swales, care of
Draft Advance Agenda 4/10/2014 10:34:53 AM
Page 2 of 2