20th Century New Towns. Archetypes and Uncertainties, Oporto, May 22-24, 2014.
FROM MOORE TO CALVINO.
The invisible cities of 20th Century planning
Eduardo Fernandes
Escola de Arquitectura da Universidade do Minho / School of Architecture of the
University of Minho, Landscape, Heritage and Territory Laboratory (Lab2TP),
Guimarães, Portugal
Ana Carina Silva
School of Architecture of the University of Minho, Guimarães, Portugal
Abstract
The contrast between the social and urban Utopia of Thomas Moore and the English Society of the sixteenth century can be
used as an excuse to reflect on the concept of Utopia as an idea that is not possible to concretize when it is proposed but can
be feasible some years later.
In the planning of 20th-Century New Towns we often find a strong component of Utopia due to the inadequacy to the social
and/or technical conditions of the moment. The contrast between the ideal plan and the construct results (when there are any)
is often strong, allowing us to consider the existing of an invisible city that is hidden behind the actual urban spaces; it can be
a utopia waiting to be concretized or a dystopia caused by an unforeseen evolution of urban spaces and social dynamics.
In the 1972 work of Calvino, The Invisible Cities, we find a poetic discourse about the city that can be interpreted as a critical
reflection on the ideas and results of the coeval urban practices.
In this paper, we intent to present an interpretation of some of the 20th Century urban ideas based on the reading of the eleven
themes of this book. The links that can be established between the various Invisible Cities (moving and combining them, like
the pieces of a chess game) inspire the formulation of several assumptions that can be related to the images, forms and ideas
of some Archetypes and Utopias of 20th Century planning: Corbusier’s Ville Radieuse, Mies van der Rohe’s plan for the IIT in
Chicago, Minoru Yamasaki’s Pruitt-Igoe housing complex, Robert Venturi’s (et al.) studies on Las Vegas and Levittown, the
images produced by Archigram and the theoretical work of Jane Jacobs, Aldo Rossi, Kevin Lynch, Rem Koolhaas, François
Ascher and Joel Garreau.
Keywords: Calvino, Utopia, Invisible, Cities, Urban
1
Eduardo Fernandes; Ana Carina Silva
From Moore to Cavino. The invisible cities of 20th Century planning.
1. Urban Utopias, from Moore to Calvino.
The word Utopia was invented by Thomas Moore,1 to use in the title of his 1516
book; since then, the contrast between the social and urban ideal presented by
Thomas Moore and the English society of the sixteenth century has been
responsible for the definition of the concept of Utopia, as an idea that is not
possible to concretize when it is proposed but can be feasible some years later
(Musil, 2008).
The book Utopia presents a conversation between the author and a Portuguese
sailor named Raphael Hythloday, an adventurer who traveled around the world.
Moore highlights Raphael’s description of an island (named Utopia) where society
is organized and ruled in an equalitarian way, with assumed influence of Plato’s
writings in Republic (Moore, 1516, p. 54);2 its social organization was clearly
utopian (for the political context of sixteenth century) and was correlated to an
ideal urban organization:
There are fifty-four cities on the island, all large and well-built (…). The
streets are very convenient for all carriage, and are well sheltered from the
winds. Their buildings are good, and are so uniform that a whole side of a
street looks like one house. The streets are twenty feet broad; there lie
gardens behind all their houses (Moore, 1516, p. 63-69).
This fragment3 of the description of Utopia’s cities is sufficient to illustrate Moore’s
ideas on urban planning: imbued with Renaissance principles and possibly
The Oxford Dictionaries (http://www.oxforddictionaries.com) presents Utopia as the junction of
the Greek expressions ou (not) and topos (place), but, according to Lewis Mumford (2007), it can
also derive from the junction of the Greek expressions eu (good) and topos. So, it can be either
translated as the non-place or the good place.
2 The defence of this social Utopia is not completely assumed in Moore’s discourse, who finishes the
book expressing that he cannot fully agree to everything Raphael Hythloday has reported. However,
it is obvious that this careful position is motivated by fear of the repressive regime of the sixteenth
century English Society, the same caution that justified the fact that the book was never published
in England before Moore’s death; nevertheless, he was executed in 1535, by order of king Henry
VIII, because he refused to take an oath recognizing the legitimacy of the new royal marriage
(ACKROYD, 1998).
3 For a more comprehensive description see the chapter ‘Of their towns, particularly of Amaurot’
(Moore, 1515, p. 67-70).
1
2
20th Century New Towns. Archetypes and Uncertainties, Oporto, May 22-24, 2014.
influenced by the writings of Vitruvius and Alberti,4 he believed in the possibility
of an ideal and universal plan, considered as guarantee for the success of an urban
space.
We can establish a relation between Moore’s Utopia and Calvino’s approach in
Invisible Cities, based in the similar number of cities referred by both authors (fiftyfour in Utopia, fifty-five in Calvino’s book), that can hardly be assumed as a
coincidence. Furthermore, Calvino’s revisits the tales of the Venetian adventurer
Marco Polo (1254-1324) with an utopian and anachronistic5 discourse that clearly
departs from the original book, Il Milione6; it is obvious that the voyages of the
Venetian are just an excuse to present a poetic discourse about the city, that
contains a critical reflection on the ideas and results of the twentieth century urban
practices. It is not a description of a utopian perfect society based in a unique
urban ideal, it is a dissertation on the complexity of urban realities.
The book consists of fifty-five narratives of different cities, interposed with
dialogues between the Venetian merchant and Kublai Khan (Mongolian emperor,
grandson of Genghis Khan). The cities are numbered from one to five and grouped
in eleven themes: memory, desire, signs, thin, trading, eyes, name, dead, sky,
continuous and hidden. They are organized in nine chapters: the first and last
contain ten cities and the other seven include five cities each, from five different
themes.
This organization seemingly chaotic hides a complex organization (see figure 1);7
on Six Memos for the Next Millennium8 Calvino emphasizes the relations between
When writing Utopia, Moore could only know the treaties published before 1516, mainly Alberti’s
De re aedificatoria libri decem (Florence, 1485) and the editions of Vitruvius De architectura libri
decem translated by Giovanni Sulpicio (Rome, 1486) and Fra Giovanni Giocondo da Verona (Venice,
1511); it is not likely that he knew the manuscripts of Antonio Averlino (Filarete), Trattato di
architettura (1461-64), or Francesco di Giorgio Martini, Architettura civile e militare (1470-90).
5 In some of the Invisible Cities, Calvino speaks of planes, airports, skyscrapers, refrigerators, radio,
light bulbs, underground trains, etc.
6 Il Milione, the book narrated by Marco Polo (1299), was one of most popular works published before
the invention of Guttenberg’s press.
7 The table on figure 1 resumes the analysis of the compositional structure of the book The Invisible
Cities that can be found, with more depth, in Towards an imaginary cartography (Silva, 2013).
8 Six Memos for the Next Millennium (Calvino, 1988) is a posthumous recollection of the
unpublished texts from a series of conferences that Calvino had scheduled at the Harvard
University, before his death (in 1985).
4
3
Eduardo Fernandes; Ana Carina Silva
From Moore to Cavino. The invisible cities of 20th Century planning.
The Invisible Cities and a chess game, recalling one of the dialogues between
Marco Polo and Kublai Khan (Calvino, 1988, p. 89).
Order
number
1
2
3
4
5
Memory
Diomira I
Isidora I
Zaira I
Zora I
Maurília II
Desire
Doroteia I
Anastásia I
Despina I
Fedora II
Zobaida III
Signs
Tamara I
Zirma I
Zoé II
Hipácia III
Olívia IV
Thin
Isaura I
Zenóbia II
Armilla III
Sofrónia IV
Octávia V
Eufémia II
Cloé III
Eutrópia IV
Ersília V
Esmeraldina
VI
Valdrada III
Zemrude IV
Bauci V
Fílias VI
Moriana VII
Name
Aglaura IV
Leandra V
Pirra VI
Clarice VII
Irene VIII
Dead
Melânia V
Adelma VI
Eusápia VII
Árgia VIII
Laudomia
IX
Sky
Eudóxia VI
Bersabeia
VII
Tecla VIII
Períncia IX
Andria IX
Continuous
Leónia VII
Trude VIII
Procópia IX
Cecília IX
Pentesileia
IX
Hidden
Olinda VIII
Raissa IX
Marozia IX
Teodora IX
Berenice IX
Trading
Eyes
Figure 1. Associating the cities by theme and order number (1
to 5, on each theme), we notice that the diagonals correspond
to the chapters (I to IX) of the book (Silva, 2013).
This idea of a chessboard is present in several parts of The Invisible Cities (p. 21,
64, 121-122, 131) and seems essential to decipher the hidden structure of this
book: ‘Kublai reflected on the invisible order that sustains cities, (…) he thought
he was on the verge of discovering a coherent, harmonious system underlying the
infinite deformities and discords, but no model could stand up to the comparison
with the game of chess’ (p. 122).
4
20th Century New Towns. Archetypes and Uncertainties, Oporto, May 22-24, 2014.
To understand this analogy, we must remember that Calvino has a passion for
numerology.9 A chessboard has sixty-four squares and Invisible Cities has seventythree parts, if we add the fifty-five cities to the eighteen dialogues between Polo and
Kublai Khan, present in all the nine chapters (both at the beginning and at the
end). However, if we consider that these eighteen dialogues can be grouped in
pairs, the total number of parts of the book equals 64. Furthermore, as in a chess
board, the pieces are alternately black and white: Calvino combines a discourse
on positive factors (values and situations) with its opposite, a difference that may
occur in the contrast between the discourse on different cities or in the duplicity
and ambiguity presented in each one.
2. The Invisible Cities as an urban idea(l).
In The Invisible Cities there is a recurrent discourse that relates the narrative of
Marco Polo to Venice, his hometown and the starting point of his journey.
Throughout the book, we can find references to the imaginary of this Italian city:
Anastasia (Desire, 2, p. 12)10 is ‘a city with concentric canals’, Esmeralda (Trading,
5, p. 88) is a ‘city of water’ where ‘a network of canals and a network of streets
span and intersect each other’ and in Phyllis (Fílias, Eyes, 4, p. 90) ‘you rejoice in
observing all the bridges over the canals, each different from the others’. In these
examples the formal allusions are quite clear, but there are many more where the
character, the history and the vitality of Venice comes to mind.
These recurrent references are clearly assumed in the dialogues between Polo and
Kublai Khan: "Every time I describe a city I am saying something about Venice."
(…) "To distinguish the other cities' qualities, I must speak of a first city that
remains implicit. For me it is Venice." (p. 86)
See his discourse on the geometric composition of ‘La vie mode d'emploi’, from Georges Perec
(Calvino, 1988, p. 142-3), which can be important to decode the compositional structure of The
Invisible Cities (Silva, 2013).
10 To reference the various quotations from “The Invisible Cities” (Calvino, 1972) we indicated the
theme (in this case, ‘Desire’), the number of the city and the number of the page of the consulted
English translation. When the original name of the cities is altered in the translation, we also present
the original name, like in Phyllis (Fílias, Eyes, 4). In the quotation of the dialogues between Marco
Polo and Kublai Khan, we only specified the page number.
9
5
Eduardo Fernandes; Ana Carina Silva
From Moore to Cavino. The invisible cities of 20th Century planning.
However, this is not true for the whole book: in many of Polo’s narratives, the
memories of Venice can be implicit,11 but the city described presents a very
different kind of images and/or ideas.
Calvino presents us with a holistic discourse on the coeval urban realities and
problems, in the way an author can perceive them in the early seventies of the
last century (but with a clear intuition of their future evolution). This is particularly
clear in four of the eleven themes of the book: ‘Cities and signs’, ‘Thin cities’,
‘Cities and the sky’ and ‘Continuous cities’.
The five cities of the theme ‘signs’ address an important issue of urban space:
semiotics. This was a very fashionable subject at the time: the parallel publication
(in 1966) of Aldo Rossi’s typological approach in The Architecture of the City and
Robert Venturi’s Complexity and Contradiction in Architecture, that presents a
clear emphasis on the relationship between language, form and meaning,
dominated the architectural/urban theoretical discourse in the end of the sixties,12
and paved the way for Venturi’s later reflection on symbolism in Learning from
Las Vegas (1972).
Published in the same year, ‘The Invisible Cities’ presents the same concern with
the relation between signs and meaning. In Tamara, the ‘eye does not see things
but images of things that mean other things’. If a building ‘has no signboard or
figure, its very form and the position it occupies in the city's order suffice to
indicate its function’ (Signs, 1, p. 13-14). We can find in this description the
famous dichotomy 'Duck' / 'Decorated Shed' (Venturi, 1972) but also a classical
idea: the order of the city communicates its functional hierarchy.
In Zirma (Signs, 2, p. 19) this discourse on semiotics is reinforced, but now the
signs are perceived in the movement and activity of ‘streets of shops where tattoos
are drawn on sailors' skin’ and in ‘underground trains crammed with obese
‘Memory's images, once they are fixed in words, are erased (…) Perhaps I am afraid of losing
Venice all at once, if I speak of it. Or perhaps, speaking of other cities, I have already lost it, little
by little.’ (p. 87)
12 The emergence of this theme on urban studies is often related to Noam Chomsky linguistics
studies; to understand the variety of approaches (Quincy, Castells, Bohigas, Rossi, Bachelard, De
Fusco, Eco, etc.) that can be find in this field, we suggest ‘Teoria das tipologias como estruturas
generativas no marco da produção urbana’ (Portas, 1972).
11
6
20th Century New Towns. Archetypes and Uncertainties, Oporto, May 22-24, 2014.
women’. Here, Calvino’s speech bifurcates into two complementary conclusions;
‘The city is redundant: it repeats itself so that something will stick in the mind’
and ‘Memory is redundant: it repeats signs so that the city can begin to exist.’ The
association of these two different notions implies that the cognitive perception of
the city can result from the redundancies of signals, behaviors and memory.
An opposite view is presented in Zoé (Signs, 3, p. 34), the city where the function
does not affect the form and the architectural language: in ‘every point of this city
you can, in turn, sleep, make tools, cook, accumulate gold, disrobe, reign, sell,
question oracles.’ This description brings to mind Charles Jencks’ criticism of the
uniform language of Mies van der Rohe in the IIT buildings (Chicago, 1962)13 or
the ironic statement on standardization that Jacques Tati presents in the movie
Playtime (1967), creating a modernized Paris made of ‘Miesien’ steel and glass
buildings. Like Zoé, these are places of ‘indivisible existence’ that raise a crucial
question: ‘why, then, does the city exist?’ (Signs, 3, p. 34).
Otherwise, in Hipácia (Signs, 4, p. 48), Polo was confronted with a city where
signs form a language, but not the one he knows. Finally, in Olívia (Signs, 5, p.
61), he concludes that ‘the city must never be confused with the words that
describe it’. This opposition between the discourse on the city and its physical
reality is the theme presented in the five chapters of Cities and names; it’s a
matter of identity, that in Olívia leads us to conclude that lies are not ‘in words’,
but ‘in things’. This notion takes us back to Las Vegas, but now to Frampton’s
(1985, p. 291) review of Venturi’s approach: ‘the ruthless kitsch of Las Vegas’ is,
in fact, ‘an exemplary mask for the concealment of the brutality of our own
environment’.
This ambivalent discourse is a recurrent feature that Calvino presents throughout
the whole book. In the narratives of the ‘thin cities’, this ambivalence is redirected
to the relations between form and function, and the discourse expresses a
fascination for the apparent fragility of urban forms that present unusual solutions
on structure and/or infrastructure.
Jencks (1973, p. 95) recalls that the chapel of the IIT had to be identified with a written sign, to
distinguished it from the other buildings.
13
7
Eduardo Fernandes; Ana Carina Silva
From Moore to Cavino. The invisible cities of 20th Century planning.
Isaura, ‘city of the thousand wells’, is described as an agglomeration of moving
mechanisms and thin structures: ‘the buckets that rise, suspended from a cable,
(…) the revolving pulleys (…) the columns of water, the vertical pipes, the
plungers, the drains, (…) the weathercocks that surmount the airy scaffoldings of
Isaura’ (Thin, 1, p. 20). In the description of Zenóbia, city ‘that stands on high
pilings’, we find the same idea of fragility: ‘many platforms and balconies placed
on stilts at various heights, crossing one another, linked by ladders and hanging
sidewalks’ (Thin, 2, p. 35). But in this city, like in Baucis (Bauci, Eyes, 3, p. 77),
where the ‘slender stilts that rise from the ground at a great distance from one
another and are lost above the clouds support the city’, it is not clear what are the
causes of the peculiar form described: ‘No one remembers what need or command
or desire drove Zenobia's founders to give their city this form’.
2. Zenóbia, hypothetical illustration of its
evolution in time: as the population increases, the water
diminishes (Acosta, 2013).
Figure
The same can be said about Armilla (Thin, 3, p. 35), mysterious city that ‘has no
walls, no ceilings, no floors: it has nothing that makes it seem a city, except the
water pipes that rise vertically where the houses should’; here, again, nobody
knows if it ‘is like this because it is unfinished or because it has been demolished,
whether the cause is some enchantment or only a whim’. Also in Octavia (Thin, 5,
p. 75), ‘spider-web city’, the reasons behind the form are not presented and the
8
20th Century New Towns. Archetypes and Uncertainties, Oporto, May 22-24, 2014.
idea of fragility is dominant in Polo’s description: ‘Suspended over the abyss (…)
the net will last only so long’.
Figure 3. Octavia, hypothetical illustration (Acosta,
2013).
Finally, in Sophronia (Sofrónia, Thin, 4, p. 63), the ambivalence between form and
function is tested to its limits. The ‘half-city’ made ‘of stone and marble and
cement’ is temporary: ‘when the period of its sojourn is over, they uproot it,
dismantle it, (…) transplanting it to the vacant lots of another half-city’; on the
contrary, the ‘half-city’ formed by ‘the shooting-galleries and the carousels’ is
permanent, and its inhabitants wait the return of the other half, so that a
‘complete life can begin again’.
This fascination for the aesthetics of fragility, complexity and motion can be
related to images created by 60’s utopian visions of the city, which seem
9
Eduardo Fernandes; Ana Carina Silva
From Moore to Cavino. The invisible cities of 20th Century planning.
particularly adequate to illustrate ‘Thin cities’: the work of the Japanese
Metabolists (Kurokawa, Isozaki, Tange, Kikutake, etc.) and, mainly, the designs
of the English group Archigram, whose peculiar ludic approach on this aesthetics
resulted in unusual relations between the architecture and the city, assuming
structure and infrastructure as main characters of the form (Banham, 1978), like
in the Fun Palace (Cedric Price), the Walking City (Ron Herron and Brian Harvey)
or the Plug-In City (Peter Cook).
In contrast, the discourse presented in The Cities and the Sky seems to be an
allegory on the impossibility of perfection in urban planning. Eudóxia (Sky, 1, p.
96-7), a city that ‘spreads out shapelessly, with crooked streets, houses that
crumble one upon the other amid clouds of dust, fires, screams in the darkness’,
is ‘the true map of the universe’ while its representation (a ‘carpet, laid out in
symmetrical motives whose patterns are repeated along straight and circular
lines’) is just ‘an approximate reflection, like every human creation’. This idea is
reinforced in Thekla (Tecla, Sky, 3, p. 127), the city in permanent construction,
following a blueprint written in the starry sky, and in Andria (Sky, 5, p. 150),
where the inhabitants are ‘convinced that every innovation in the city influences
the sky's pattern’ and plan the changes to their city calculating ‘the risks and
advantages for themselves and for the city and for all worlds.’
The duality between the immobility of the plan (ideal representation restricted by
human limitations) and the permanent changes in the organism of the city is
reinforced with the example of the perfect plan of Perinthia:
(…) the astronomers established the place and the day according to the
position of the stars; they drew the intersecting lines of the decumanus and
the card (…). They divided the map according to the twelve houses of the
zodiac (…). Perinthia - they guaranteed - would reflect the harmony of the
firmament; nature's reason and the gods' benevolence would shape the
inhabitants' destinies. (Períncia, Sky, 4, p. 144)
10
20th Century New Towns. Archetypes and Uncertainties, Oporto, May 22-24, 2014.
However, all this efforts did not avoid the birth of succeeding generations of
‘cripples, dwarfs, hunchbacks, obese men, bearded women’ and ‘children with
three heads or with six legs’.
The description of Perinthia’s fate evokes the results of many urban experiences,
where the strong belief in the reliability of the plan was later denied by the
evaluation of the results. One well-known example of these failures is the PruittIgoe housing complex in St. Louis, design by the ‘distinguished architect Minoru
Yamasaki’ and ‘subject of a laudatory article in the magazine Architectural Forum’
(Hall, 1988): completed in 1956, it was imploded in 1972 and became a symbol
of failure, the failure of Athens Charter’s urban ideas in the second half of the
twentieth century. This ‘rigid process of planned production’ (Tafuri, 1976) often
failed to create good urban environments, mainly because social problems are not
an architectural issue, they are a planning matter; thus, it is more important to
try to understand the real necessities of the people than to draw blueprint that
reflects the harmony of the firmament.
But if the results of well-intended planning can be negative, what is the
consequence of having no plan at all?
In the Continuous Cities, Calvino seems to address this question. Leonia
(Continuous, 1, p. 114), archetype of the contemporaneous city of the economic
globalization, lives divided between ‘the enjoyment of new and different things’
and ‘the joy of expelling, discarding, cleansing itself of a recurrent impurity’;
because it shares this characteristics with every other city, ‘the whole world,
beyond Leonia's boundaries, is covered by craters of rubbish, each surrounding a
metropolis in constant eruption’. In Procópia (Continuous, 3, p. 146) we find the
same discourse on incontrollable growth, but now directed to the increase of the
population: each year, as soon as Marco Polo arrives in the same hotel room, he
can count more faces in the landscape he sees through the window, until the day
when ‘even the sky has disappeared.’
The other three cities of this theme reflect on the incontrollable and unplanned
growth of urban space. Trude (Continuous, 2, p. 128) is a city with no identity,
where nothing is new: the ‘world is covered by a sole Trude which does not begin
11
Eduardo Fernandes; Ana Carina Silva
From Moore to Cavino. The invisible cities of 20th Century planning.
and does not end’; the cities are all the same, ‘only the name of the airport
changes’. In Cecília (Continuous, 4, p. 152) the growth of the city (‘Cecilia is
everywhere’) occupies what used to be the meadows where a shepherd used to
herd his goats. Finally, Penthesilea (Pentesileia, Continuous, 5, p. 162) is a
continuous suburb: we ‘advance for hours and it is not clear to you whether you
are already in the city's midst or still outside it’; we can’t even understand if ’there
exists a Penthesilea the visitor can recognize and remember, or whether
Penthesilea is only the outskirts of itself.’
Reading Continuous Cities is slightly disturbing because we tend to find possible
allusions to many contemporary discourses on the city, although knowing that the
book was published in the early seventies. His visionary discourse makes us
admire Calvino’s capacity of foresight: Leonia is a Metapolis, a product of the third
modern urban revolution (Ascher, 1995); Trude is a Generic City (Koolhaas,
1995); Cecilia and Penthesilea can either be related to the American Edge City
(Garreau, 1988) or to the diffuse landscape characteristic of the valley of the river
Ave, in Portugal (Portas, 1986). In all these spaces, reading Calvino’s meaning
between the lines, we find a concept that is related to all the others: Marc Augé’s
(1992) non-place,14 a space that cannot be defined in terms of identity,
relationships and history. Clearly, this is not what the author considers urbanity;
it is the opposite of a city.
Calvino’s urban idea(l) is portrayed in other parts of this book: it is made of many
fragments and mingles different topics, sometimes by analogy, sometimes by
contrast, sometimes with an ambivalence that expresses opposite views on each
subject.
Both in Cities and Memory and in Cities and Names, Calvino speaks us of identity,
nostalgia and illusion: the city ‘does not tell its past, but contains it like the lines
of a hand, written in the corners of the streets, the gratings of the windows, the
banisters of the steps’ (Zaira, Memory, 3, p. 11); but if we try to preserve it
unchanged, and force it ‘to remain motionless (…) in order to be more easily
remembered’, it will be destroyed (Zora, Memory, 4, p. 16). Divided between
14
Non-place is one of the possible meanings of the word Utopia (see note 1).
12
20th Century New Towns. Archetypes and Uncertainties, Oporto, May 22-24, 2014.
nostalgia and the needs of the modern times, we have to remember that
‘sometimes different cities follow one another on the same site and under the
same name, born and dying without knowing one another’ (Maurília, Memory, 5,
p. 30).
In the Cities and Desire the approach is similar, but now Polo’s speech wanders
on the relation between urban spaces, material possessions and lust:
(…) while the description of Anastasia awakens desires one at a time only
to force you to stifle them, (…) one morning your desires waken all at once
and surround you (…) you can do nothing but inhabit this desire and be
content. (Anastasia, Desire, 2, p. 12).
In Trading Cities, Calvino’s ideal vision of the city is divided between the
possibilities of change (opening new opportunities) and the prevalence of the need
to socialize. In Euphemia (Trading, 1, p. 12) the main subject is human relations
and communication (social trading): “what drives men to travel up rivers and cross
deserts to come here is not only the exchange of wares’; at night, ‘by the fires all
around the market’, the merchants share (and trade) their tales.
The other side of urban communication is presented in Chloe, a city where ‘people
who move through the streets are all strangers’;15 but this unfamiliar condition
does not limit the imagination: ‘when some people happen to find themselves
together (…) meetings, seductions, copulations, orgies are consummated among
them without a word exchanged, without a finger touching anything, almost
without an eye raised’ (Cloé, Trading, 2, p. 51). On the contrary, in Ersilia
(Trading, 4, p. 76), ‘relationship of blood, of trade, authority, agency’ are
emphasized and symbolized by strings that produce a web, the only thing
remaining when the inhabitants leave the city; like Ersilia, Eutropia (Trading, 3,
p. 64) is recurrently abandoned, so the inhabitants can find a different life, with
This description resembles Jane Jacobs’s definition of a city: “...cities are, by definition, full of
strangers. (...) The bedrock attribute of a successful city district is that a person must feel personally
safe and secure on the street among all these strangers.” (Jacobs, 1961, p.39-40).
15
13
Eduardo Fernandes; Ana Carina Silva
From Moore to Cavino. The invisible cities of 20th Century planning.
‘a new job, a different wife, (…) another landscape (…) different pastimes, friends,
gossip’.
In Cities and the Dead, we find a similar discourse on social trading, but now in
an approach that considers the passing of time, the cultural inheritance of the
urban societies, the presence of the legacy of our antecessors in our present
occupations (Eusápia, Dead, 3, p. 109), social habits (Melania, Dead, 1, p. 80)
and even in the physiognomy of the people we see (Adelma, Dead, 2, p. 94).
Otherwise, in the Cities and the Eyes, Calvino reflects on the different ways we
can see the same city, on the cognitive perception of urban space (Lynch, 1960):
they can compete with their own reflection, like Venice (Valdrada, Eyes, 1, p. 53),
depend on the ‘mood of the beholder’ (Zemrude, Eyes, 4, p. 66) or ‘elude the gaze
of all, except the man who catches them by surprise’ (Phyllis, Eyes, 4, p. 90).
Finally, in the ‘Hidden Cities’, we find a recurrent tale of the birth of a new city
within a preexisting one: Olinda (Hidden, 1, p. 129) ‘grows in concentric circles,
like tree trunks which each year add one more ring’; Raissa (Hidden, 2, p. 148) is
an ‘unhappy city’ that ‘contains a happy city unaware of its own existence’; finally,
Berenice (Hidden, 5, p. 161) ‘is a temporal succession of different cities,
alternately just and unjust.’
Hidden can be seen as a synonym of Invisible; thus, this last theme is the perfect
corollary for the whole book: this idea of permanent renewal, of continual vitality,
and the opposition between the need for development and the importance of the
past exists in almost every page. It embodies the dilemma of Marco Polo, divided
between the memory of Venice and the fascination for all the novelty he finds on
his journey. But it is also the problem of the modern planner, throughout the
twentieth century: from the modern plans influenced by the Athens Charter to the
more recent experiments of rebuilding the city within the city in the third
generation plans (Secchi, 1985) or in the organization of international events
(Expos, Olympics, etc.), architects and urban planners are always facing this
opposition.
14
20th Century New Towns. Archetypes and Uncertainties, Oporto, May 22-24, 2014.
But what is especially interesting in Calvino’s idea(l) of city, what makes his
approach a valid contribution to this field, is the importance granted to the
ambivalence created by the different human visions, concepts and interactions:
identity, nostalgia, seduction, fear, anger, illusion, delusion, envy, greed, lust and
pride are vital variables, that can transform an ideal plan (with blueprints that
reflect the harmony of the firmament) into an urban failure.
Acknowledgments
The idea of writing this paper results directly from the experience of supervision
of the Master Thesis Towards an imaginary cartography. Defragmenting “The
Invisible Cities” from Italo Calvino, developed by Ana Carina Silva in the School of
Architecture of University of Minho. Some of the images presented were included
in another Master Thesis (unrelated to the first one) from the same School,
presented by Ricardo Acosta (and supervised by Marta Labastida), who kindly
permitted their use in this paper.
References
Acosta, R. (2013). O Desenho de Secção: uma ferramenta operativa da
Arquitectura. (Master Thesis; supervisor: Labastida, M.). Guimarães: School of
Architecture of University of Minho.
Ackroyd, P. (1998). The Life of Thomas More. United Kingdom: Doubleday.
Augé, M. (1992). Non-Lieux. Paris: Éditions du Seuil
Ascher, F. (1995). Metapolis ou l’avenir des villes. Paris: Éditions Odile Jacob.
Ascher, F. (2001). Les nouveaux principes de l’urbanisme. Paris: Éditions de
l’Aube.
Banham, R. (1976). Megastructure. Urban futures of the recent past. London:
Thames and Hudson.
15
Eduardo Fernandes; Ana Carina Silva
From Moore to Cavino. The invisible cities of 20th Century planning.
Calvino, I. (1972). Le Città Invisibili. Giulio Einaudi Editore (English Ed.: Invisible
cities. Harcourt Brace & Company. 1974).
Calvino, I. (1988). Lezioni americane. Sei proposte per il prossimo millennio.
(Portuguese Ed.: Seis propostas para o próximo milénio. Lisboa: Teorema, 1990).
Garreau, J. (1988). Edge City. New York: Anchor Books.
Hall, P. (1988). Cities of Tomorrow. Oxford, U. K.: Blackwell.
JACOBS, J. (1961). The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York:
Penguin Books.
Koolhaas, R. (1995). The generic city. In Koolhaas, R. SMLXL. New York: Monacelli
Press.
Lynch, K. (1960). The image of the City. Massachusets Institute of Technology.
Moore, T. (1516). Utopia. (Portuguese edition: Europa-América, 1995).
Musil, R. (1943). Der Mann ohne Eigenschaften. (Portuguese edition: O Homem
sem Qualidades. Lisboa: Dom Quixote, 2008).
Polo, M. (1299). Il libro di Marco Polo detto Milione (Portuguese edition: As Viagens
de Marco Polo, Publicações Europa-América).
Portas, N. (1972). Teoria das tipologias como estruturas generativas no marco da
produção urbana. El Symposium de Castelldefels. Barcelona: COACyB.
Portas, N. (1986). Modelo territorial e intervenção no médio Ave. Sociedade e
Território, 5, November.
Rossi, A. (1966). L’architettura della città. Pádua.
Secchi, B. (1985). Third Generation Plans. In Casabella, N° 516, September.
Silva, A. C. (2013). Towards an imaginary cartography. Defragmenting “The
Invisible Cities” from Italo Calvino (Master Thesis; supervisor: Fernandes, F.).
Guimarães: School of Architecture of University of Minho.
16
20th Century New Towns. Archetypes and Uncertainties, Oporto, May 22-24, 2014.
Tafuri, M. (1976). Architecture and Utopia. Design and Capitalist Development.
Massachusets Institute of Technology.
Venturi, R. (1966). Complexity and Contradiction in Architecture. New York:
MOMA.
Venturi, R. Et. al. (1977). Learning from Las Vegas: The Forgotten Symbolism of
Architectural Form. Massachusets Institute of Technology.
Author identification
Eduardo Fernandes
([email protected])
Born in 1966, Porto, Portugal.
Architect (1992, Faculty of Architecture, University of Porto); Master in Planning
of the Urban Environment (1998, Faculties of Architecture and Engineering,
University of Porto); PhD in Architectural Culture (2011, School of Architecture at
the University of Minho) with the thesis The Choice of Oporto: contributions to
update the idea of a School (http://repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt).
Assistant Professor (and current Course Director) of the Master in Architecture of
the University of Minho, Portugal.
Author of several architectural projects and published texts.
Ana Carina Silva
([email protected])
Born in 1983, Fafe, Portugal.
Master in Architecture in 2013 (School of Architecture of University of Minho,
Guimarães, Portugal) with the Thesis Towards an imaginary cartography.
Defragmenting “The Invisible Cities” from Italo Calvino.
17