Company Update, 23 January 2015 Goldpac Group (3315 HK) Buy (Maintained) Technology - Technology Market Cap: USD540m Target Price: Price: HKD8.90 HKD5.04 Macro Risks Key Concerns Addressed At Plant Visit Growth Value Goldpac (3315 HK) Price Close Relative to Hang Seng Index (RHS) 10.30 124 9.30 111 8.30 97 7.30 84 6.30 71 5.30 57 4.30 70 44 50 40 30 Nov-14 Sep-14 Jul-14 May-14 Mar-14 Jan-14 Vol m 10 Source: Bloomberg Avg Turnover (HKD/USD) Cons. Upside (%) Upside (%) 52-wk Price low/high (HKD) Free float (%) Share outstanding (m) Shareholders (%) 12.8m/1.65m 88.9 76.6 4.78 - 9.50 38 831 Mr. Lu Run Ting Gemalto 43.4 18.4 Share Performance (%) Strong volume growth since Dec 2014. We hosted a visit to Goldpac Group’s (Goldpac) Zhuhai factory on 21 Jan for investors. Management said that volume growth of integrated circuit (IC) cards has remained strong since Dec 2014 for two key reasons. First, the newly-issued PBOC 3.0 standard (a higher security standard that all banks should comply with by 1 Apr 2015), has had a minimal negative impact on cards issued as the necessary upgrades of IT systems by banks to comply with the new standard has already been completed. Second, demand for IC cards remains strong. The company has been running at full capacity on chip cards YTD with a strong orderbook till next month. Positive outlook for other businesses. Management also sees robust growth momentum for its non-banking cards (ie social security and healthcare cards) from 2016. It expects the volume of healthcare cards (also smart IC cards) to increase to over 10m in 2015 from a few hundred thousand last year. Overseas expansion is also well on track. Goldpac's production facilities in the Philippines will commence operation this month. Including HK, the Philippines is its second overseas operations and management believes it will expand into more countries. Reiterate BUY with a revised HKD8.90 TP. We lower our TP to HKD8.90 (from HKD9.50) on an unchanged 17x FY15F P/E. Maintain BUY. We tweak our EPS lower by 5% for FY15-16 on slightly lower ASP assumptions, mainly due to a faster-than-expected decline in IC chip cost. We forecast recurring EPS growth of 42% and 27% YoY for FY14 and FY15, respectively. Goldpac has achieved No.1 market share in domestic IC card shipments by both value and volume. However, it is trading at 10x 2015F P/E, substantially below its A-share listed peers of 30x and strategic shareholder Gemalto's (GTO NA, NR) 16x. As its outlook remains intact, we think the recent share price correction offers an attractive BUY opportunity. YTD 1m 3m 6m 12m Absolute (5.8) (9.2) (31.4) (36.5) (40.7) Forecasts and Valuations Dec-12 Dec-13 Dec-14F Dec-15F Dec-16F Relative (9.0) (13.2) (35.5) (38.9) (46.2) Total turnover (CNYm) 677 1,112 1,514 2,349 2,913 Reported net profit (CNYm) 115 141 224 344 449 Recurring net profit (CNYm) 103 168 254 361 459 Recurring net profit growth (%) 67.8 63.6 51.0 42.1 27.3 Recurring EPS (CNY) 0.20 0.30 0.29 0.42 0.53 DPS (CNY) 0.10 0.17 0.07 0.10 0.14 Recurring P/E (x) 20.0 13.7 13.8 9.7 7.6 P/B (x) 9.64 1.54 2.14 1.84 1.55 P/CF (x) 8.9 21.8 10.4 7.9 5.9 Dividend Yield (%) 2.4 4.3 1.7 2.6 3.4 EV/EBITDA (x) 12.8 3.9 6.8 4.2 2.7 Return on average equity (%) 63.9 17.5 15.1 20.3 22.6 Shariah compliant Jackson Yu, CFA +852 2103 9424 [email protected] Net debt to equity (%) Our vs consensus EPS (adjusted) (%) See important disclosures at the end of this report 2 . 2 0 . 3 0 0 . 1 0 0 We recently hosted a reverse roadshow to the Zhuhai production plant. . 0 Maintain BUY with a slightly lower HKD8.90 TP (17x FY15F P/E, 76.6% 0 upside). Management believes that investor concerns over potential 0 shipment delays are unwarranted as orders have remained strong since Dec 2014. Goldpac remains optimistic on its outlook, especially for volume growth in FY15-16. Nonetheless, we trim our FY15-16 EPS by 5% on lower ASP assumptions. 60 20 Source: Company data, RHB net cash net cash net cash net cash net cash (3.2) (2.4) Powered by EFATM Platform (7.0) 1 Goldpac Group (3315 HK) 23 January 2015 Top Investors’ Q&As We recently organised a reverse roadshow to Goldpac's Zhuhai production plant with a group of investors. Overall, management remains optimistic on its outlook, especially for volume growth in FY15-16. Investors’ feedback from the trip was generally positive and they believe the outlook for Goldpac is promising. In this note, we highlight responses from management to five key questions from investors. What are Goldpac’s key competitive advantages over its peers? Management highlighted that Goldpac has become the largest card manufacturer in terms of value and volume in 2014 with about 20% market share, according to China Union Pay. Management believes the barriers of entry to the financial card industry and the competitive edges are mainly related to service reliability, services variety and innovation capabilities. Certification from payment organisations is one of the key barriers for the industry Goldpac's full range of services is one of its key competitive edges compared to its peers Firstly, Goldpac is the only card manufacturer that is certified by all six payment organisations, ie Visa, MasterCard, American Express, China UnionPay, JCB and Diners Club International, while most of its peers in China are certified by UnionPay and Visa only. These payment organisations conduct frequent inspections on Goldpac’s production flow, security control as well as product quality. Owning these certifications implies Goldpac’s adherence to the industry's high product standard. Product quality and suitability are also the reason Goldpac can expand its presence into Hong Kong and Macao, as international card issuers usually work with a wider circle of payment card organisations. Goldpac currently has over 60% market share in Hong Kong in terms of new card issuance. Secondly, providing one-stop solutions to banks is also one of the key factors that banks would work with Goldpac. Goldpac's services cover almost all the outsourcing card services for banks, from card body design, software embedding, to personalisation and mailing to end-customers. The delivery cycle for the company is only 1-2 days after they receive orders from banks. Compared against other competitors, Goldpac provides more integrated services – which results in it offering more value-added services to customers. The company is the largest personalisation services provider in China, according to Frost & Sullivan. Personalisation services include a series of customised services like loading personal data, associate packaging and card mailing. The company is able to distribute personalised cards directly to end-users 24 hours a day and seven days a week on behalf of their customers. Strong software R&D capabilities differentiate Goldpac from its peers Thirdly, product research and development (R&D) is one of the emerging factors that banks value nowadays. According to management, following the migration policies of IC chip card in China and Visa/Master card entering into China, banks are also looking at software solution capabilities and R&D capabilities of card suppliers when they choose card suppliers. Management believes Goldpac stands out with its strong internal R&D team providing a wide range of software solutions to card issuers, while its competitors still rely on outsourcing software solutions companies. R&D cost will account for over 40% of its topline in the next few years. What are Goldpac’s key earnings growth drivers going forward? Management is optimistic on card shipment growth in FY15-16 Banking chip cards. Management believes chip card growth will be the company’s main earnings driver in the three two years. According to the migration mandate released by the People’s Bank of China (PBOC), all banks in the country are required to retire the issuance of magnetic stripe bank cards by 1 Jan 2015. Management expects the number of new chip cards issued in China to grow 50-80% YoY in the next few years, and Goldpac is trying to expand its market share in tandem with the industry growth. The company has raised its capacity to 300m cards at the end of 2014, from 250m cards at the end of 2013. Goldpac has the flexibility to shift capacity between magnetic cards and IC chip cards. With third phase of its production capacity already in place at the end of 2014, management sees upside potential on further capacity expansion in the year. See important disclosures at the end of this report 2 Goldpac Group (3315 HK) 23 January 2015 According to management, since late Dec 2014, Goldpac's plant is running at full capacity and order pipeline has been strong as well. Management sees accelerating volume not just from big banks but smaller banks as well. Goldpac sees strong volume growth from smart card under PBOC 3.0 standard, which is a higher security standard required by the PBOC, implying banks are well-prepared for the new standards. Management is encouraging staff to stay in the factory during the Chinese New Year so as to fulfil orders on hand. Goldpac is confident that the company will report strong chip card volume growth in 2015-2016. Non-banking cards such as healthcare cards and social security cards could fuel earnings growth from FY15 Overseas expansion in the Philippines has kicked off Non-banking cards. Management expects the volume of healthcare cards (also smart IC cards) to increase to over 10m in 2015, from minimal volume last year. Healthcare cards' ASP is slightly lower than that of banking cards while its margin could be similar as that of banking cards given the usage of lower-cost domestic chips. Overseas market expansion. Management sees overseas expansion will add additional profit to Goldpac in 2015-2016. The privatisation centre in the Philippines will commence operations this month, according to management. The Philippine Government aims to complete Europay, MasterCard and Visa EMV card migration by 2017. Orders in the Philippines are all quoted in CNY to avoid foreign exchange risks. ASP in the Philippines is better than that in China. Goldpac believes its Philippine business will be the gateway to the company's expansion in the South-East Asian region. What is the impact from rapid growth of mobile payment? Concern on threat from emerging mobile payment and online payment is overdone Some investors see the card payment industry as a sunset industry given the anticipated impact of mobile payments substituting card payments in the long term. Mobile payments have achieved a revolutionary breakthrough last year as Tencent Holdings (700 HK, BUY, TP: HKD159) and Alipay utilise mobile applications like Didi Dache and Kuraidi Dache to rapidly grow their user bases and increase the adoption of their services in cities in China. In Mar 2014, Alibaba (BABA US, NR) announced that it would roll out its first virtual credit card in China (which it aims to do very soon) as a result of its co-operation with China Citic Bank (998 HK, NR). On the same day, Tencent also announced that it will team up with China Citic Bank to launch a virtual credit card on the WeChat platform. Both Alibaba and Tencent plan to issue 1m virtual credit cards at the first stage. However, in late Mar 2014, the PBOC halted barcode and virtual credit card payments in China, mainly due to concerns over the security of verification procedures. There are also talks about whether the Government is capping the amount allowed for online and mobile payments to avoid payment fraud. Management does not see mobile payment as threat as it believes card payment will continue to be the mainstream Goldpac is well-positioned in the mobile Regarding some recent discussions about mobile payment and card payment in China, management does not see any negative impact from increasing e-payment or online payment at this moment. Management reiterates its views as follow: i. Goldpac is ready in software-based payment technology including online payment and mobile payment. The company has existing technological know-how in near-field communication-single wire protocol (NFC-SWP) payment. The value of transactions using credit cards is still growing in China. Compared to card transactions, the scale of mobile payments is still small in China. Goldpac has not identified any mainstream emerging payment method yet. It sees higher potential in NFC payment (chip-based) method in the long run given the higher security requirements. ii. According to the previous PBOC's announcement, China currently does not allow the existence of virtual credit card. All online transactions are linked with physical banking cards, either debit or credit. Goldpac believes there is no material cannibalisation from mobile payment or online payment at the current stage as card payment is still the mainstream. iii. Goldpac is open to acquire some mobile payment companies or third-party payment companies in order to increase its own R&D capabilities in this area. However, detailed merger and acquisition (M&A) direction has not been decided yet. payment field with existing technological know-how in NFC-SWP payment See important disclosures at the end of this report 3 Goldpac Group (3315 HK) 23 January 2015 Figure 1: Value of financial card transactions in China Figure 2: Value of financial card, third-party and mobile payment transactions in 2013 (CNYbn) 35.0 32 30.0 25.0 08-13 CAGR: 52% 21 Financial card payment CNY32trn 20.0 15 15.0 Third party payment CNY5.3trn 10 10.0 5.0 Mobile payment CNY1trn 7 4 0.0 2008 2009 2010 2011 Source: PBOC 2012 2013 Source: PBOC, iResearch How does Goldpac procure IC chips given chip cost is the largest cost component of the company? NXP is still playing the dominating role in chip supply Gemalto procures IC chips from NXP Semiconductors (NXP) (NXPI US, NR) through large-batch global procurement orders. Gemalto then resells IC chips to Goldpac at cost. According to management, NXP is almost the monopoly supplier of IC chips for banking cards with about 70-75% market share. Other domestic card manufacturers usually order chips from NXP directly at relatively higher cost than the price Goldpac procured from Gemalto. Chip cost accounts for 70% of Goldpac’s total cost of goods sold (COGS). Although Gemalto does not restrict Goldpac's IC chip procurement, most banks and customers are encouraging the usage of NXP chips. As NXP's IC chip is better in quality and price is fair, almost 90% of IC chips used by Goldpac are produced from NXP now. Chinese chip manufacturers are ramping up but they still lag behind NXP in terms of technology, product stability/quality and cost of production, among others. They still rely on government subsidies at the current stage. There are many reasons why NXP is the dominating player in the industry. i. NXP owns almost all the patents in terms of production standards and product specifications. It also works with banking card organisations (EMV, Visa, Master) in setting up the chip standard in the early days. Chinese chip manufacturers like Shanghai Fudan (1385 HK, NR), Huahong (Not listed) and Datong (600198 CH, NR) need to develop production techniques and get certified by EMV Corp before they can receive mass orders from card manufactures. ii. NXP has product quality and economies of scale. Even if new players are able to get certifications, it may take years for banks and card manufacturers like Goldpac to test the product with small volume trial orders. Without economies of scale and government subsidies right now, domestic chip manufacturers cannot compete with NXP in ASP given their higher costs of production. Goldpac sees the ramp-up of domestic chip supply as a positive to its margins See important disclosures at the end of this report Goldpac believes chip localisation is a long-term trend in China given the Government's support in industry development. The company has been working with all six domestic IC chip suppliers in product testing together with banks in small batches since last year. Management estimate that the increasing usage of domestic chips should slightly lower the company’s cost base and increase its gross margin as domestic chips are currently selling at a discount to NXP's chips. 4 Goldpac Group (3315 HK) 23 January 2015 Why was the share price so weak recently? Management sees several reasons behind the recent share price weakness. Goldpac believes the concern over PBOC 3.0 standard is overdone. Shipments since Dec 2014 have been robust i. Goldpac's pre-IPO investor, BOCI, placed shares in Nov 2014. There is some lingering effect on the placement. This, coupled with a sector rotation from small-mid sector to big-cap sector in early December, caused Goldpac's share price to be vulnerable to the market selldown. ii. In 4Q13, the PBOC announced that all the banks should comply with the new PBOC 3.0 standard by end of 1 Apr 2015. Goldpac saw slight volume weakness in Nov 2014 as a result given that banks need to upgrade their IT hardware to comply with the new standard. There are market concerns that the new PBOC standard could cause delays of shipments in 1Q15. Management clarified that PBOC 3.0 will not cause major delays in shipments as banks can still choose to issue cards that comply with the PBOC 2.0 standard before Apr 2014. In fact, the company has seen both PBOC 3.0 orders and PBOC 2.0 orders in the past few months. Following the temporary weakness in shipment volume in November, the company has seen a strong pickup in volume in Dec 2014 and much stronger orders in Jan 2015. Management agrees with our view that shipment volume of cards will mainly be driven by demand from consumers who apply for new cards. In fact, management believes its strong card shipments and orderbook could be attributable to banks' card promotion before the Chinese New Year. Management remains confident on the shipment volume growth this year. Goldpac did not allow us to take photos in the Figure 3: Goldpac's card board production plants. We took photos at Goldpac's entrance, where the company showcased all the cards that the company produced in the past Source: RHB Figure 4: Goldpac's card board Source: RHB See important disclosures at the end of this report 5 Goldpac Group (3315 HK) 23 January 2015 Earnings Revision ASP revision We slightly lower our ASP forecast for Goldpac. Management has guided for a 5-10% decline in ASP for FY14-16 due to a sequential decline in chip cost. According to management, IC chip selling price declined 10% in 2014, especially in 2H14, due to increasing upstream competition and the lowering of ASP by NXP. Management believes its ASP could decline further in 2015 due to a further decline in chip cost and increasing batch purchasing of chip cards from banks in FY15. We had previously expected chip card ASP to decline by 3% YoY and 2% YoY in FY15 and FY16, respectively. We lower our ASP forecast by 3-6% for FY14-16, anticipating YoY ASP declines of 12%/6%/4% in FY14/FY15/FY16 respectively. Figure 5: Earnings revisions FY14 Old New Volume (m cards) 160 ASP (CNY/card) 7.5 FY15 % YoY Old New 160 0% 290 7.3 -3% 7.3 24.0% 24.0% 0ppt FY16 % YoY Old New % YoY 290 0% 380 380 0% 6.9 -5% 7.0 6.6 -6% 25.0% 25.0% 0ppt 26.0% 26.0% 0ppt Chip card assumptions GP margin (%) Revenue by segement (CNYm) Cards 1,280 1,248 -3% 2,143 2,014 -6% 2,696 2,527 -6% Personalisation services 161 161 0% 225 225 0% 270 270 0% On-site card issuance 105 105 0% 111 111 0% 116 116 0% 1,546 1,514 -2% 2,478 2,349 -5% 3,082 2,913 -5% Total Financials (CNYm) Revenue 1,546 1,514 -2% 2,478 2,349 -5% 3,082 2,913 -5% Gross profit 448 440 -2% 695 660 -5% 877 833 -5% EBIT 276 272 -1% 424 403 -5% 546 520 -5% Net profit 227 224 -1% 362 344 -5% 471 449 -5% Recurring net profit 257 254 -1% 379 361 -5% 481 459 -5% EPS (Fen) 29.7 29.3 -1% 43.7 41.7 -5% 55.5 53.0 -5% GP margin 29.0% 29.1% 0.1ppt 28.0% 28.1% 0.0ppt 28.4% 28.6% 0.1ppt EBIT margin 17.8% 17.9% 0.1ppt 17.1% 17.1% 0.0ppt 17.7% 17.9% 0.1ppt NP margin 14.7% 14.8% 0.1ppt 14.6% 14.6% 0.0ppt 15.3% 15.4% 0.1ppt Recurring net margin 16.6% 16.8% 0.1ppt 15.3% 15.4% 0.1ppt 15.6% 15.8% 0.2ppt Margins (%) Source: RHB Earnings estimates We maintain our forecasts on volume and margins for FY14-16. Due to lower ASP forecast for Goldpac in FY14-16, we revise down Goldpac's EPS by 1% for FY14 and 5% for FY15-16. We now expect Goldpac to deliver a recurring net profit growth of 139% YoY in 2H14 to CNY121m. We forecast a recurring EPS growth of 42% YoY and 27% YoY for FY14 and FY15, respectively. According to management, the company had cash inflow of CNY400m in December as banks settle their payments before year-end. We expect year-end account receivables level should be much lower than that in Jun 2014. Management also mentioned that the company is considering share buyback or increasing its dividend payout for 2014 to increase the return to shareholders. We currently forecast a 25% dividend payout for Goldpac in FY14-16. See important disclosures at the end of this report 6 Goldpac Group (3315 HK) 23 January 2015 Figure 6: P&L summary (CNYm) Turnover Cost of sales FY12 FY13 FY14F FY15F FY16F 1HFY13 2HFY13 1HFY14 677 1,112 1,514 2,349 2,913 540 572 822 2HFY14 692 (473) (788) (1,074) (1,690) (2,080) (384) (404) (584) (490) Gross profit 203 324 440 660 833 156 168 239 201 Gross margin 30.1% 29.1% 29.1% 28.1% 28.6% 28.9% 29.4% 29.0% 29.1% Other operating income Selling expenses % of turnover Administrative expenses % of turnover R&D expenses % of turnover Total Opex % opex of turnover EBIT EBIT margin Finance income Finance cost 7 22 30 46 58 (3) 25 24 5 (42) (75) (103) (157) (192) (25) (50) (56) (47) 6.8% 6.7% 6.6% 6.1% 6.8% (14) 2.0% (14) 1.3% (29) 1.3% (76) (28) 1.2% (32) 1.1% 4.7% (6) 1.2% (19) 8.7% (8) 1.4% (14) 1.7% (6) 0.8% (117) (146) 5.0% 5.0% (84) (136) (198) (303) (370) (51) (85) (102) (96) 12% 12% 13% 13% 13% 9% 15% 12% 14% 4.8% (32) 6.8% 5.0% 3.6% (27) 6.8% 4.2% 4.2% (47) (20) 3.9% (43) 6.3% 127 210 272 403 520 102 108 161 111 19% 19% 18% 17% 18% 19% 19% 20% 16% 6 3 32 34 38 0 3 15 17 (7) (2) (1) (1) (1) (1) (2) (0) (1) Share of after-tax loss of an associate 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other non-operating income/expenses 12 (27) (30) (17) (10) 0 (27) (12) (18) 109 PBT 138 183 273 419 548 102 82 164 Tax (23) (43) (49) (75) (99) (20) (22) (42) Effective tax rate (%) Net profit YoY growth (%) Net margin Recurring net profit YoY growth (%) 16.6% 23.2% 18.0% 18.0% 18.0% 20.0% 27.2% 25.7% (7) 6.4% 115 141 224 344 449 81 60 122 102 139.4% 22.3% 59.0% 53.6% 30.6% 70.4% -11.7% 49.5% 71.9% 17.0% 12.7% 14.8% 14.6% 15.4% 15.0% 10.4% 14.8% 14.8% 103 168 254 361 459 67.8% 63.6% 51.0% 42.1% 27.3% 81 170.4% 87 128.9% 133 121 163.8% 138.9% Source: Company data, RHB See important disclosures at the end of this report 7 Goldpac Group (3315 HK) 23 January 2015 Valuation Revising down TP to HKD8.90 from HKD9.50 We revise down our TP for Goldpac to HKD8.90 from HKD9.50 given our lower estimate for Goldpac's FY15 EPS. We value Goldpac at 17x P/E, applying our FY15F EPS forecast. 17x is on par with its average 1-year forward P/E since listing. Goldpac has no directly comparable peers listed in Hong Kong. All of its peers are listed in China, ie Eastcompeace Technology (Eastcompeace) (002017 CH, NR), Hengbao (002104 CH, NR) and Wuhan Tianyu Information Industry (Tianyu) (300205 CH, NR). Its strategic shareholder Gemalto is listed in the Netherlands. Goldpac is now trading at 10x FY15F P/E, which is substantially below valuations of its A-share listed peers and its strategic shareholder, Gemalto. In terms of share price performance, Goldpac has substantially underperformed its A-share listed peers. We forecast a recurring EPS growth of 42% YoY and 27% YoY for Goldpac in FY14 and FY15, respectively. We believe the recent share price correction offers an attractive BUY opportunity A major risk to our call is ASP dropping faster than expected due to fluctuations in IC chip market prices. Figure 7: Goldpac’s forward P/E band (HKD) 13 +2sd: 23x 12 11 +1sd: 19x 10 9 Mean: 17x 8 -1sd: 13x 7 6 -2sd: 10x 5 4 3 Dec-13 Mar-14 Jun-14 Sep-14 Dec-14 Source: Bloomberg, RHB Figure 8: Valuation comparison I Company Ticker Goldpac 3315 HK Hengbao Tianyu Price Mkt cap 3m avg t/o EPS 3YR Lcy USDm USDm CAGR 3m 6m 14F 15F 14F 15F 14F 15F 14F 15F (30.9) (36.1) 13.8 9.7 2.1 1.8 15.1 20.3 1.7 2.5 %chg P/E P/BV ROE Div Yield 5.04 544 1.7 21.8 002104 CH 14.10 1,619 37.6 37.9 2.2 16.3 33.6 24.4 6.6 5.4 23.1 22.0 1.6 2.2 300205 CH 15.88 1,099 33.6 45.0 (8.3) 20.1 50.9 34.3 5.9 5.5 9.1 16.1 N/A N/A EastCompeace 002017 CH 14.88 691 12.3 N/A (10.4) 11.2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Gemalto 64.87 6,619 27.4 16.3 2.9 (12.5) 19.5 15.8 2.4 2.2 12.2 14.0 0.6 0.7 34.7 24.8 5.0 4.4 14.8 17.4 1.1 1.5 GTO NA Average Source: Company data, RHB See important disclosures at the end of this report 8 Goldpac Group (3315 HK) 23 January 2015 Financial Exhibits Profit & Loss (CNYm) Dec-12 Dec-13 Dec-14F Dec-15F Total turnover 677 1,112 1,514 2,349 Dec-16F 2,913 Cost of sales (473) (788) (1,074) (1,690) (2,080) Gross profit 203 324 440 660 Gen & admin expenses (14) (14) (20) (28) (32) Selling expenses (42) (75) (103) (157) (192) 833 Other operating costs (21) (25) (46) (71) (88) Operating profit 127 210 272 403 520 Operating EBITDA 142 228 299 446 577 Depreciation of fixed assets (16) (18) (27) (43) (56) Amortisation of intangible assets - - - - Operating EBIT 127 210 272 403 520 38 (0) Interest income 6 3 32 34 Interest expense (7) (2) (1) (1) (1) Exceptional income - net 12 (12) (30) (17) (10) Other non-recurring income - (16) - - - Pre-tax profit 138 183 273 419 548 Taxation (23) (43) (49) (75) (99) Profit after tax & minorities 115 141 224 344 449 Reported net profit 115 141 224 344 449 Recurring net profit 103 168 254 361 459 Dec-12 Dec-13 Dec-14F Dec-15F Dec-16F 127 210 272 403 520 16 18 27 43 56 102 (81) 86 54 84 1 (12) (30) (17) (10) 245 135 355 483 651 6 3 32 34 38 (7) (2) (1) (1) (1) Tax paid (12) (31) (49) (75) (99) Cash flow from operations 232 105 337 441 590 Capex (30) (50) (200) (200) (150) Source: Company data, RHB Cash flow (CNYm) Operating profit Depreciation & amortisation Change in working capital Other operating cash flow Operating cash flow Interest received Interest paid Other investing cash flow (1) (706) Cash flow from investing activities (31) (756) (200) (200) (150) Dividends paid (39) (101) (56) (86) (112) Proceeds from issue of shares - - - - (22) - - - (0) - - (56) (86) (112) Increase in debt Other financing cash flow Cash flow from financing activities 1,125 (142) (181) 1,002 - - - - Cash at beginning of period 22 42 394 475 630 Total cash generated 20 352 81 155 328 Forex effects (0) Implied cash at end of period 42 0 394 - - - 475 630 958 Source: Company data, RHB See important disclosures at the end of this report 9 Goldpac Group (3315 HK) 23 January 2015 Financial Exhibits Balance Sheet (CNYm) Dec-12 Dec-13 Dec-14F Dec-15F Dec-16F Total cash and equivalents 279 1,324 1,405 1,560 1,888 Inventories 146 272 348 552 554 Accounts receivable 189 206 394 470 554 Total current assets 613 1,802 2,147 2,583 2,995 95 126 299 456 549 18 18 18 18 95 144 317 474 567 708 1,946 2,464 3,056 3,563 37 15 15 15 15 421 498 848 1,183 1,352 Tangible fixed assets Intangible assets Total non-current assets Total assets Short-term debt Accounts payable Other current liabilities - 31 28 28 28 28 488 541 891 1,226 1,395 Other liabilities 6 8 8 8 8 Total non-current liabilities 6 8 8 8 8 494 549 899 1,233 1,403 Total current liabilities Total liabilities Share capital 0 1 1 1 1 Other reserves 213 1,396 1,564 1,822 2,159 Shareholders' equity 213 1,397 1,565 1,823 2,160 Total equity 213 1,397 1,565 1,823 2,160 Total liabilities & equity 708 1,946 2,464 3,056 3,563 Source: Company data, RHB Key Ratios (CNY) Dec-12 Dec-13 Dec-14F Dec-15F Dec-16F Revenue growth (%) 52.3 64.4 36.1 55.2 24.0 Operating profit growth (%) 68.0 65.3 29.6 48.3 29.2 Net profit growth (%) 139.4 22.3 59.0 53.6 30.6 EPS growth (%) 139.4 9.6 4.5 53.6 30.6 Bv per share growth (%) 45.2 525.9 (28.1) 16.5 18.5 Operating margin (%) 18.7 18.8 17.9 17.1 17.9 Net profit margin (%) 17.0 12.7 14.8 14.6 15.4 Return on average assets (%) 18.7 10.6 10.2 12.5 13.6 Return on average equity (%) 63.9 17.5 15.1 20.3 22.6 (113.1) (93.7) (88.8) (84.8) (86.7) DPS 0.10 0.17 0.07 0.10 0.14 Recurrent cash flow per share 0.45 0.19 0.39 0.51 0.68 Net debt to equity (%) Source: Company data, RHB See important disclosures at the end of this report 10 Goldpac Group (3315 HK) 23 January 2015 SWOT Analysis The only financial card supplier in China certified by six leading payment card organisations Slower-thanexpected financial card growth in China after 2016 R&D capabilities in securities management and new payment technologies Long-standing relationships with clients in China Overseas expansion slows due to local regulations Financial card migration in China may boost the growth of smart card shipments Lower penetration of financial cards in China compared to other developed countries Overseas M&As ASP is likely to decline due to cheaper input of IC chips P/E (x) vs EPS growth P/BV (x) vs ROAE 124% 12.0 53% 30 107% 10.0 44% 25 89% 20 71% 8.0 35% 6.0 26% 36% 4.0 18% 5 18% 2.0 9% 0 0% 0.0 0% 15 53% P/E (x) (lhs) Jan-16 Jan-15 Jan-14 Jan-13 Jan-12 10 EPS growth (rhs) Source: Company data, RHB P/B (x) (lhs) Jan-16 61% 35 Jan-15 70% 14.0 Jan-14 16.0 142% Jan-13 160% 40 Jan-12 45 Return on average equity (rhs) Source: Company data, RHB Company Profile Goldpac supplies and distributes financial cards, card personalization services, on-side card insurance system solutions, magnetic strip cards and smart cards in China, Hong Kong and Macao. See important disclosures at the end of this report 11 Goldpac Group (3315 HK) 23 January 2015 Recommendation Chart Price Close Recommendations & Target Price 9.50 na 10.60 9.60 8.60 7.60 6.60 5.60 Buy 4.60 Dec-13 Neutral Sell Mar-14 Trading Buy Jul-14 Take Profit Not Rated Nov-14 Source: RHB, Bloomberg Date Recommendation Target Price Price 2014-11-12 Buy 7.51 9.50 Source: RHB, Bloomberg See important disclosures at the end of this report 12 RHB Guide to Investment Ratings Buy: Share price may exceed 10% over the next 12 months Trading Buy: Share price may exceed 15% over the next 3 months, however longer-term outlook remains uncertain Neutral: Share price may fall within the range of +/- 10% over the next 12 months Take Profit: Target price has been attained. Look to accumulate at lower levels Sell: Share price may fall by more than 10% over the next 12 months Not Rated: Stock is not within regular research coverage Disclosure & Disclaimer All research is based on material compiled from data considered to be reliable at the time of writing, but RHB does not make any representation or warranty, express or implied, as to its accuracy, completeness or correctness. No part of this report is to be construed as an offer or solicitation of an offer to transact any securities or financial instruments whether referred to herein or otherwise. This report is general in nature and has been prepared for information purposes only. It is intended for circulation to the clients of RHB and its related companies. Any recommendation contained in this report does not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and the particular needs of any specific addressee. This report is for the information of addressees only and is not to be taken in substitution for the exercise of judgment by addressees, who should obtain separate legal or financial advice to independently evaluate the particular investments and strategies. This report may further consist of, whether in whole or in part, summaries, research, compilations, extracts or analysis that has been prepared by RHB’s strategic, joint venture and/or business partners. No representation or warranty (express or implied) is given as to the accuracy or completeness of such information and accordingly investors should make their own informed decisions before relying on the same. RHB, its affiliates and related companies, their respective directors, associates, connected parties and/or employees may own or have positions in securities of the company(ies) covered in this research report or any securities related thereto, and may from time to time add to, or dispose off, or may be materially interested in any such securities. Further, RHB, its affiliates and related companies do and seek to do business with the company(ies) covered in this research report and may from time to time act as market maker or have assumed an underwriting commitment in securities of such company(ies), may sell them or buy them from customers on a principal basis and may also perform or seek to perform significant investment banking, advisory or underwriting services for or relating to such company(ies), as well as solicit such investment, advisory or other services from any entity mentioned in this research report. RHB and its employees and/or agents do not accept any liability, be it directly, indirectly or consequential losses, loss of profits or damages that may arise from any reliance based on this report or further communication given in relation to this report, including where such losses, loss of profits or damages are alleged to have arisen due to the contents of such report or communication being perceived as defamatory in nature. The term “RHB” shall denote where applicable, the relevant entity distributing the report in the particular jurisdiction mentioned specifically herein below and shall refer to RHB Research Institute Sdn Bhd, its holding company, affiliates, subsidiaries and related companies. All Rights Reserved. This report is for the use of intended recipients only and may not be reproduced, distributed or published for any purpose without prior consent of RHB and RHB accepts no liability whatsoever for the actions of third parties in this respect. Malaysia This report is published and distributed in Malaysia by RHB Research Institute Sdn Bhd (233327-M), Level 11, Tower One, RHB Centre, Jalan Tun Razak, 50400 Kuala Lumpur, a wholly-owned subsidiary of RHB Investment Bank Berhad (RHBIB), which in turn is a wholly-owned subsidiary of RHB Capital Berhad. Singapore This report is published and distributed in Singapore by DMG & Partners Research Pte Ltd (Reg. No. 200808705N), a wholly-owned subsidiary of DMG & Partners Securities Pte Ltd, a joint venture between Deutsche Asia Pacific Holdings Pte Ltd (a subsidiary of Deutsche Bank Group) and OSK Investment Bank Berhad, Malaysia which have since merged into RHB Investment Bank Berhad (the merged entity is referred to as “RHBIB”, which in turn is a whollyowned subsidiary of RHB Capital Berhad). DMG & Partners Securities Pte Ltd is a Member of the Singapore Exchange Securities Trading Limited. DMG & Partners Securities Pte Ltd may have received compensation from the company covered in this report for its corporate finance or its dealing activities; this report is therefore classified as a non-independent report. As of 22 January 2015, DMG & Partners Securities Pte Ltd and its subsidiaries, including DMG & Partners Research Pte Ltd do not have proprietary positions in the securities covered in this report, except for: a) As of 22 January 2015, none of the analysts who covered the securities in this report has an interest in such securities, except for: a) Special Distribution by RHB Where the research report is produced by an RHB entity (excluding DMG & Partners Research Pte Ltd) and distributed in Singapore, it is only distributed to "Institutional Investors", "Expert Investors" or "Accredited Investors" as defined in the Securities and Futures Act, CAP. 289 of Singapore. If you are not an "Institutional Investor", "Expert Investor" or "Accredited Investor", this research report is not intended for you and you should disregard this research report in its entirety. In respect of any matters arising from, or in connection with this research report, you are to contact our Singapore Office, DMG & Partners Securities Pte Ltd Hong Kong This report is published and distributed in Hong Kong by RHB OSK Securities Hong Kong Limited (“RHBSHK”) (formerly known as OSK Securities Hong Kong Limited), a subsidiary of OSK Investment Bank Berhad, Malaysia which have since merged into RHB Investment Bank Berhad (the merged entity is referred to as “RHBIB”), which in turn is a wholly-owned subsidiary of RHB Capital Berhad. 13 RHBSHK, RHBIB and/or other affiliates may beneficially own a total of 1% or more of any class of common equity securities of the subject company. RHBSHK, RHBIB and/or other affiliates may, within the past 12 months, have received compensation and/or within the next 3 months seek to obtain compensation for investment banking services from the subject company. Risk Disclosure Statements The prices of securities fluctuate, sometimes dramatically. The price of a security may move up or down, and may become valueless. It is as likely that losses will be incurred rather than profit made as a result of buying and selling securities. Past performance is not a guide to future performance. RHBSHK does not maintain a predetermined schedule for publication of research and will not necessarily update this report Indonesia This report is published and distributed in Indonesia by PT RHB OSK Securities Indonesia (formerly known as PT OSK Nusadana Securities Indonesia), a subsidiary of OSK Investment Bank Berhad, Malaysia, which have since merged into RHB Investment Bank Berhad, which in turn is a wholly-owned subsidiary of RHB Capital Berhad. Thailand This report is published and distributed in Thailand by RHB OSK Securities (Thailand) PCL (formerly known as OSK Securities (Thailand) PCL), a subsidiary of OSK Investment Bank Berhad, Malaysia, which have since merged into RHB Investment Bank Berhad, which in turn is a wholly-owned subsidiary of RHB Capital Berhad. Other Jurisdictions In any other jurisdictions, this report is intended to be distributed to qualified, accredited and professional investors, in compliance with the law and regulations of the jurisdictions. DMG & Partners Research Guide to Investment Ratings Kuala Lumpur Hong Kong Singapore Malaysia Tel : +(60) 3 9280 2185 Fax : +(60) 3 9284 8693 19 Des Voeux Road Central, Hong Kong Tel : +(852) 2525 1118 Fax : +(852) 2810 0908 Tel : +(65) 6533 1818 Fax : +(65) 6532 6211 Buy: Share price may exceed 10% over the next 12 months Trading Buy:Malaysia Share price may exceed 15% over theRHB nextOSK 3 months, however longer-term outlook remains uncertain Research Office Securities Hong Kong Ltd. (formerly known DMG & Partners Neutral: Share mayInstitute fall within months as 12 OSK Securities Securities Pte. Ltd. RHB price Research Sdn the Bhdrange of +/- 10% over the next Take Profit: Target price One, has RHB beenCentre attained. Look to accumulate at lower Honglevels Kong Ltd.) Level 11, Tower 10 Collyer Quay Sell: Share price may more than 10% over the next 12 months Jalanfall TunbyRazak 12th Floor #09-08 Ocean Financial Centre Lumpur World-Wide House Singapore 049315 Not Rated: Stock isKuala not within regular research coverage DISCLAIMERS Phnom Penh This research is issuedJakarta by DMG & Partners Research Pte Ltd and it is forShanghai general distribution only. It does not have any regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and particular needs of any specific recipient of this research report. You should independently evaluate particular PT RHB OSK and Securities Indonesia (formerlyfinancial known asadviser RHB OSK (China) Advisory Ltd. into any RHBtransaction OSK Indochina Securities Limited (formerly investments consult an independent before makingInvestment any investments or Co. entering in relation to any securities or PT OSKmentioned Nusadana in this report. (formerly known as OSK (China) Investment known as OSK Indochina Securities Limited) investment instruments Securities Indonesia) Plaza CIMB Niaga Advisory Co. Ltd.) Suite 4005, CITIC Square No. 1-3, Street 271 Sangkat Toeuk Thla, Khan Sen Sok Tel : +(6221) 2598 6888 Tel : +(8621) 6288 9611 Fax: +(855) 23 969 171 The information contained herein has been obtained from sources 1168 we believed to be reliable but we do not make any representation or warranty nor 14th Floor Nanjing West Road Phnom Penh accept any responsibility or liability as to its accuracy, completeness orShanghai correctness. are subject to change Jl. Jend. Sudirman Kav.25 20041Opinions and views expressed in this report Cambodia without notice. Jakarta Selatan 12920, Indonesia China Tel: +(855) 23 969 161 Fax : +(6221) 2598or6777 Faxof: +(8621) 6288 9633or sell any securities. This report does not constitute form part of any offer or solicitation any offer to buy Bangkok DMG & Partners Research Pte Ltd is a wholly-owned subsidiary of DMG & Partners Securities Pte Ltd, a joint venture between OSK Investment Bank Berhad, Malaysia which have since merged into RHBRHB Investment Bank Berhad (the merged entity is referred to as “RHBIB” which in turn is a whollyOSK Securities (Thailand) PCL (formerly known owned subsidiary of RHB Capital Berhad) and Deutsche Asiaas Pacific Holdings Pte Ltd (a PCL) subsidiary of Deutsche Bank Group). DMG & Partners Securities OSK Securities (Thailand) Pte Ltd is a Member of the Singapore Exchange Securities Trading Limited. 10th Floor, Sathorn Square Office Tower 98, North Sathorn Road, Silom Bangkok 10500 DMG & Partners Securities Pte Ltd and their associates, directors,Bangrak, and/or employees may have positions in, and may effect transactions in the securities Thailand covered in the report, and may also perform or seek to perform broking and other corporate finance related services for the corporations whose securities Tel: +(66) 2 862report. 9999 are covered in the report. This report is therefore classified as a non-independent Fax : +(66) 2 108 0999 As of 22 January 2015, DMG & Partners Securities Pte Ltd and its subsidiaries, including DMG & Partners Research Pte Ltd, do not have proprietary positions in the subject companies, except for: a) As of 22 January 2015, none of the analysts who covered the stock in this report has an interest in the subject companies covered in this report, except for: a) DMG & Partners Research Pte. Ltd. (Reg. No. 200808705N) 14
© Copyright 2024