REFERENCES REFERENCES ~nonymous. 1990. Agricultural statistics, 1989-90, Govt. of Madhya Pradesh. Published by Commissioner, Land Record Settlement, and Gwalior, M.P. PP. l-196. l\hmed, T. 1938. The tur-pod fly, Agromyza obtusa Mall., a pest of Cajanus cajan. Ind. J. Agri. Sci. 8 63-76. Anderson, J.F. and H.Kaya. 1973. Influence oviposition on parasitism of Elm Spanworm by Ooencyrtus clisiocampae and Telenommus alsophilae. Environ. Entomol. 2 : 705-ll. ~rgikar, G.P. and damage B.V.Thobbi. caused Exelastis ~ril. Arthur, A. P. by atomosa 1957. the I~. An estimate tur to pod of the caterpillar, pigeonpea grain. Poona Coll. Mag. 48 (1) : 25-26. 196 2. Influence of host tree on abundance of Itoplectis conquisi tor (Say), a polyphayous parasite of the European shoot moth, Rhyacionia buoliana (Schiff). Can. Entomol. 94 : 337-47. Audemard, H., Causse, R. and H. Feron. 1976. Lutte intogree en vergers de pommiers. Orientation nouvelle dans la lutte pomonella) contreile C. R. Carpocapsa Seances Acad. (Laspeyresia Agri. Fr. 62 228-235. Awasthi, J.K. and A. Bhatnagar. 1983. ~note on caused by pod borer complex in pigeonpea. Ent. 24 (1) : 37-40. damugc Bull. 199 Ayyar, T.V.R. 1940. A hand book of economic entomology for South India. Published by the Controller of Stationary and Printing, Madras. PP. 528. Balasubramanian, T.R. G., Rabindra, Subramanian. R.J., 1976. Menon, Control borers with spray formulations. of P.P.V. and redgram pod Madras Agril. J. 63 (4) : 251-252. Balasubramanian, M., Natesan, R. and Mohanvel. K. 1980. The effect of diflubenzuron-A chitin inhibitor on Spodoptera litura. The Andhra Agric. J. 27 (1&2) : 74-79. Banerjee, B. 1978. Annual (1977-78) ~port Entomology Section Tocklai Expl. Station, Jorhat : 42-44. Beevi, S.P. and D. Dale. 1980. Effect of diflubenzuron on larvae of rice swarming caterpillar, Spodoptera mauritia Boised (Lepidoptera : Noctuidae). Res. 4 Beevi, S.P. ~.Ent. 157-160. and D. Dale. of diflubenzuron actions 1984. Sterilent on the and ovicidal rice swarming caterpillar. Pesticides. 18 (10) : 54-55. u.c. Bhaduria, N.S., Dhamdhere, S.V.; Singh, 1988. Note insecticides on early on the efficacy agains~ of and U.S.Mishra. some ~.obtusa pigeonpea pod fly, pigeonpea. Legume Research. modern ll ( 3) 147 - 149. Bl1aradwaj, S.C., Re1a ti ve Pandey, S.N. toxicity of and S.R.S. some Yadava. insecticides 1978. to the fullgrown caterpillar of Exelastis atomosa Wlsm. Ind. J. Ent. 40 (4) : 451-453. Bhatnagar, v.s. Proc;rcs;; 1981. Cropping Rcport-8 India. PP 7-21. Systems ICRISi\T, (Entomology) Patancheru, i\.P., 200 Bl1atnayar, v.s., Lateef, S.S., Sithananthan, S. and W. Reed. 1982. Research on Heliothis at ICRISAT. Proc. of the Work~hop Int. on Heliothis 15-20 Mgmt., November, 1981, Patancheru, A.P. India : 385-395. Bhosale, D.J. and R.N. Nawale. 1983. Relative susceptibility of pigeonpea Maharashtra Bilapate, G.G. 1985. (Hub.) germplasm ~ric. to gram Univ. 8 (1) pod borer. J. : 30-31. Investigations on Heliothis armigera in Marathwada-XXVIII. Key mortality factors in regular and overlapping generations on pigeonpea. Proc. of the Ind. 94 Acad. of Sci. 463-468. Bilapate, G.G., Mokat, R.B., Lovekar, R.C. and D.N. Bagade. 1988. Population (Hub.) and its ecology of parasites Heliothis on pulses. maharashtra Agric. Univ. 13 (3) Bindra, O.S. and losses S.S. caused Jakhmola. 1967. by some pod Millsp.). Ind. J. J. of of and 299-302. Incidence infesting insects (Caj~ different varieties of pigeonpea (L) armigera Agric. Sci. 37 in cajan (3) 177-186. Bindra, O.S. and H. Singh. 1972. Tur pod fly, Melanagromyza obtusa Malloch. Pesticides. 6 (7) Bishop, F.C. (Diptera : Agromyzidae). 11-12. 1929. The bollworm or corn earworm. Farmer's Bull. 1595-1614. Eorikar, P.S. and Cajanus D.\'1. cajan l·ladnerkar, L. and Cult. 45 (9) by 1979. Losses ~1elanagromyza 366. to tur, obtusa. Sci. 201 Cl1andrakar, M.K., Katiyar, O.P., Chitale, M.W., Deale, J.Y., Kittur, S.U. and G.L. Patidar. Incidence 1981. of major insect pests on pigeonpea selections at Raipur. Int. Pigeonpea Newsl. 1 : 34-35. Chaudhary, J.P., Rustogi, K.P. and L.S. Yadav. 1979. Intensity of attack of~- armigera (Hub.) on gram in Haryana. Ind. J. Ent. 44 (2) : 173-174. Chaudhary,J.P., Yadav, L.S. and F.S. Paonia. An 1980. integrated approach for the control of pod borer, Heliothis armigera (Hubner) on pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan Millsp.). Legume Research. 3 (2) : 59-65. Chaudhary,J.P.,Yadav, L.S. and K.B. Rustogi. 1980. Studies on the chemical control of Hcliothis armigera Hubner (Noctuidae (Cajanus cajan Lepidoptera) (L.) Millsp.). on pigeonpea Haryana Agric. Univ. J. Res. 10 (4) : 472-475. Chauhan, R. and B. Dahiya. and pod fly Damage due to pod borer 1987. in early maturing plgeonpea in Haryana. Ind. J. genotypes of Pla!!.! Prot. 15 ( 1) : 5-9. Chclliah, S., P.P.V. Menon. redgram Agric. Chhabra, K.S. T., Surulivelu, (Cajanus ~- and 1978. 65 (3) B.S. Balasubramanian, Studies cajan : L.) on pod the G. and control borers. of Madras 1~3-187. Kooner, 1979. Field evalution of certain insecticides for the control of tur pod fly. ~lelanagromyza obtusa Malloch and pod borer complex.Pesticides Information. 4 (4) Cranham,J.E. 1978. Control diflubcnzuron. Mitt. of codling Biol. Forstwirtsch. 85 : 103-110. 89-92. moth with Bundesanst. Land 202 Cushman, R.A. 1926. Location of systematic relation determining factor individual of in host versus hosts as species parasite a Proc. attack. Entomol. Soc. Wash. 28 : 5-6. Dalebout, C.P. 1985. The diflubenzuron, Proc. insect regulator, growth its main characteristics and use. National Seminar Behav. Physical ~· Mgmt. Crop Pests. TNAU, Coimbatore : 161-166. Dandale, H.G., Khan, K.M., Thakre, H.S. 1981. Comparative efficacy and M.N. Borle. of synthetic pyrethroids against pod borer complex of redgram. Indian J. Ent. 43 ( 4) : 416-419. Das, A.N., Samalo, A.P. and B.R.Singh. 1988. Susceptibility of pigeonpea cultivars bruchid infestation. against pod borer and Environment and Ecology. 6 (2): 526-527. Dash, A.N., Mahapatra, H. 1987. Pradhan, A.C. and N.C. Patnaik. Effect of mixed and intercropping on occurrence of some pests in Orissa. and Ecology. 5 ( 3) : 526-530. Daware, D.G. of and B.K. Dhanorkar. pod borers 1981. in redgram. the Environment Chemical Pesticides. control 15 (l) : 35. Deokar, A.B., Bharud, R.W. and N.K. Umrani. 1983. Incidence of pod borer intercropping. on pigeonpea cul ti vars Int. Pigeonpea Newsl. 2 under {3) 61-62. lllwnorkar,B.K. and D.G.Daware. insccti cidcs for the 1979. control Evaluation of pod of some borers rcdyram. Res. Bull. Marathwada Aqric. Uni. : RS-RG. on 3 (7) 203 Dutta Gupta, A. 1987. Studies on the major borer pests of 'arhar', Cajanus cajan on rice bunds. M.Sc. (Ag.) Ent. Thesis submitted to JNKVV, Jabalpur. PP. 1-103. Flanders, S.E. 1937. Habitat selection by Trichogramma. Annals Entomol. Soc. Am. 30 : 208-10. Fletcher, T.B. 1917. Pest of Tur Leguminous field crop, Tur, Cajanus cajan. Proc. 2nd Ent. 41-79. ~·· Pusa : Fox, P.M., Thurston, R. and B.C. Pass. 1967. Notes on Myzus Annals persicae as a host for Aphidius smithi. Entomol. Soc. Am. 26 : 536-53. Gangrade, G.A. 1963. Assessment of damage to 'tur' cajan) in Madhya Pradesh by 'tur' (Cajanus pod Agromyza obtusa Mall. Ind. J. Agric. Sci. : 17-20. Gangrade, G.A. 1964. Losses to 'tur' (Cajanus fly, 33 ( 1) cajan) by Melanagromyza obtusa Malloch. Ind. J. Ent. 26 (3) : 364-65. Ganyard, M.C., Bradley, J.R., Boyd, J.P. and J.R. Brazzel. 1977. Field evaluation of diflubenzuron (DIMILIN) for control of boll 1~eevil reproduction. J. Entomology. 70 (3) i 347-350. ~· Ghosh, M.R. 1981. Incidence of some important insect pests on rcdgram ( Ca janus ca jan) in West Bengal. Entomon. 6 (3) Gunasekaran, K. and M. : 215-218. Balasubramanian. 198 7. Field efficacy of diflubenzuron against ~· armigera in chickpea. Madras ,\qric. J. 74 (l) : 52-53. 204 Gunathilaga, K.R. and T. Kumaraswamy. 1979. Screening of pigconpea (Cajanus cajan L.) varieties for resistance to pod borers. Madras Agric. J. 66 (8) : 551-54. Hanifa, A.M. , Rabindra, Balasubramanian, R. J. ' G. ' 1977. Menon. Surulivelu, P.P.V. T. and Comparative efficacy of dust, spray and granular formulations of insecticides in controlling the pod borer of redgram. Ind. J. Plant Prot. 5 (1) : 83-86. Heinrichs, E.A., Chelliah, S., Valencia, S.L., Arceo, M.B., Fabellar, L.T., Aquino, G.B. and S. Pickin. 1981. Manual for testing insecticides on rice. Published by IRRI, Los Banos, Philippines, 134 P. Herrebout, W.M. and J.Van Der Veer. 1969. Habitat selection in Eucarcelia rutilla Vill. female of known age. Z. II. Experiments with Angew. Entomol. 63 336-49. ICRISAT. 1977. Pest surveys. Annual Report 1976, ICRISAT, Patancheru, A.P., India : 90. ICRISAT. 1980. Survey Pigeonpea, an of off insect pests print from of pigeonpea. ICRISAT Annual Report : 108-111. ICRISAT. 1984. Annual Report 1983, Patancheru, A.P., India : 162-166. ICRISAT. 1986. Annual Repo.E! 1985, Patancheru, A.P., India : 190-195. ICRISAT. 1987. Annual Report 1986, : 181-188. Patancheru, A.P. India 205 Ipe, 1964. I.l"l. Anatomy l"lelanayromyza of the instar (Mall), obtusa -- developing seeds final larva of of the pest a of Cajanus indicus (Agromyzidae Diptera) Agra Univ. J. Res. 13 (3) : 59-72. s. Jaipal, 1985. Evaluation control of Bihar of diflubenzuron for caterpillar. Tests --- hairy Agro-chemicals and Cultivars. 6 : 20-21 Jakhmola, 1965. S. S. pod Incidence and T., Hanson, of i· F.E. Agri£. Sci. 37 (3) and V.G. specific food 1978. Entomological Report, All ~Pulses, 1981. JNKVV. B.G., India some Induction lepidopterous 211-30. ll Rabi Co-ordinated Progress Research Project JNKVV, Jabalpur : 35-37. Ramprasad, Experiments. Kharif Progress ICAR, Jabalpur : 28. AICPIP, kernel ~· in experiments Entomological ~epor!. Joshi, by : 177-178. 1968. oethier. preference larvae. Entomol. Exp. JNKVV. caused of infesting insects in different varieties of pigeonpea. Ind. Jermy, losses the G. and S.Sitaramaiah. suspension protects tobacco 1978. Neem nurseries. Indian Farming. 28 (9) : 1-2. Kabaria, B., Goyal, S.N. of insect pests and A.H.Shah. damage to 1988. Surveillance pigeonpea at stage in Bharuch district, Gujarat, podding India. Int. tur crop. Crop Pigeonpea Newsl. 8 : 15-16. Kadam, H.V. and G.A.patel. pests and how 1956. to Pests fight of them. Directorate of publicity : Govt. of Haharashtra, Bombay : 73-77. Kapadia, r.l.N. in and G.M. \veight (Ca]<:n1u;: Talati. of capn grains 1983. in Mil1sp.) Gi\U Res. J. 9 (l) Estimation of T-15-15 due : 68-69. to variety tur pod losses of tur borers. 206 Karcem, A.B. 1980. Relative efficacy of certain insecticides against gram pod borer. Pesticides annual 79-80. Khaire, V.M., Umap, K.B. and U.N. Mote. 1989. Camparative incidence and chemical control of pod borer Bull. Plant Prot. complex pigeonpea. in (Faridabad) 41 (l-2) : 31-36. Kooner, B.S., Singh, and H. K.B. Singh. Relative 1976. susceptibility of germplasm of pigeonpea against tur pod fly, condition. Melanagromyza Plant Prot. obtusa Bull. under India. field (~) 24 7-18. Lal, s.s. and C.P. Yadav. 1987. Estimation of crop losses in pigeonpea caused by the pod borer complex. FAO Bull. 35 (3) : 93-98. Plant~· Lal, s.s. and C.P.Yadav. insecticides Efficacy 1988. against pod borers pigeonpea. Pesticides. 22 ( 12) Lal, S.S., Yadav, C.P. and C.A.R. of certain infesting : 30-35. Dias. 1981. Major pest problems of pigeonpea in Uttar Pradesh (India). Int. Pigeonpea Ne\vsl. 1 LaL Yadav, S.S., C.P. 30-31. and J .N. Sachan. 1988. Studies on some aspects of oviposition and damage of pod fly in relation Res. l Lateef, S.S. (2) to host phenology. Ind. J. Pulses : 83-88. and Y.V.R. Reddy. 1984. Parasitoids of some pigconpea pests at ICRISAT. Int. Pigeonpea Newsl. 3 Tefroy, 11.1-1. ;,,,,,., 11.11. (3) : 46-47. 1906. Indian Insect Pests : 142-143. ---- l'l07. Indian The more important insects injurious <h;riculturc. (~St1S3n) 2 : 219. ~1cm. ncpt. Agric. to India 207 Leuschner, K. 1972. Effect of an unknown plant substance on a shield bug. Naturwissenschaften 59 ( 5) 217-218. Lewis, W.J., Brazzel, J.R. and S.B. Vinson. 1967. Heliothis subflexa, Econ. Entomol. 60 Lewis, W.J. ~· a host for Cardiochiles nigriceps. 615-16. and S.B. Vinson. 1971. Suitability of certain Heliothis as hosts for the parasite, Cardiochiles nigriceps. Annals Entomol. Soc. Am. 64 : 970-72. Loganathan, M. and M. Gopalan. 1985. Effect of host plants on the susceptibility insecticides,Ind. Lopez, J.D., Ridgway, ~· of H. armigera Hub. to Plant Prot. 13 (1) : 1-4. R. L. and R. E. Pinnell. 1976. Comparative efficacy of four insect predators of the bollworm and tobacco budworm. Environmental Entomology. 5 : 1160-64. Malloch, 1-lcKague, J.R. 1914. Annales Nationalis ~EQ~· Historico Musci 12 : 323-331. A.B. and R.B. Pridrnors. 1978. Toxicity of Altosid and DIMILIN to Juvenile rainbow trout and salmon. Bull. Environ. J. Wysoki, residual Entomol. Toxicol. coho 20 I 167-169. Meisner, Naturales M. and effect of K.R.S. some Ascher. products 1976. from The neem (Azadirachta indica) seeds upon larvae of Boarmia (Ascotis) selenaria Schiff. in laboratory trials. Phytoparasitica. 4 : 185-192. i-lhase, N.L., Kadam, M.V. and D.S. Ajri. 1986. Incidence c·f pod borer complex ·on early and late maturing varieties of pigeonpea. Current Research Reporter. ~ (::'): 312-314. 208 ~lhase, N.L., Kadam, control M.V. of and pod D.S. borer Ajri. complex of Current Research Reporter. 3 (1) Nikaov, M. The lucerne moth. 1961. Chemical 1987. pigeonpea. 32-38. .!..P!.· Rest Zasht • ~E· 47 : 57. Milliron, H.E. 1940. A study of some factors affecting the efficiency of Encarsia formosa Gahan, an aphelinid parasite of the green house \vhi tefly, Trialeurodes vaporariorum (Westw.) Mich Agric. Exp. St. Tech. Bull. 173 : 1-12. ~lishra, P.N. and H.P. Saxena. 1983. Phytotonic effects of insecticides in Pigeonpea, Cajanus Millsp. Madras Agric. :I· 70 (5) cajan (L.) : 309-311. Mishra, P.N. and H.P. Saxena 1984. Phytotonic responses of some organophosphorus insecticides in pigeonpea, Cajanus cajan (L.) insect pests. (3) ~lishra, Millsp., IRAQI J. while controlling Sci., ZANCO. of Agric. 2 77-84. P.N. and H.P. quinalphos ~lillsp. Saxena. in Var. 1985. pigeonpea, 'Prabhat'. Dissipation Cajanus cajan Pesticides. 19 of (L.) (5) 26-271 36 • ~1ontei th, L.G. 1955. Mesn. with Host preferences particular of reference Drino to bohemica olfactory responses. Can. Entomol. 87 : 509-30. i'lontei th, L.G. 1956. selection determined 583-86. ::ulder, R. and i'l.J. nf t1:n 1:1th of in Influence hosts a'n by of Drino olfactor. Gijswijt. 1973. host movement bohemica Mesn. Can. Entomol. on as 88 Laboratory evaluation ;>romising ne1: insecticides which intcrfcro cuticle deposition. Pesticide Sci. 4 209 Murthy, R.L.N. 1979. Physiological and contact activity of dif lubenzuron against Spodoptera Pesticides, 13 (12) Naresh, J.S., of li tura larvae. 33. s.s. and B.Dahiya. 1983. Assessment Sharma, losses caused by Heliothis obtusa ~lelanagromyza pigeonpea in Haryana. in eight Ind. J. armigera and varieties Plant Prot. of ll 37-39. Naresh, J. S. and J. damage of Singh. 1984. Population dynamics and insect pests in flowering pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.). Ind. J. Ent. 46 (4) : 412-420. Natarajan, N., Kumaraswami, T. and M. Balasubramanian. 1985. ' Field efficacy of moult inhibitor pests. Proc. ~· on groundnut Seminar Behav. Physical ~· Ngmt. Crop. Pests, TNAU, Coimbatore : 171-174. Odak, S.C.,Mishra, V.K., 1982. Nema, K.K. Preliminary studies and O.K. Shrivastava. on the ovipositional and developmental response of the exotic parasite, Eucelatoria sp. NR Armigera (Tachinidae : Diptera) on Heliothis armigera Hub. Research. 5 (1) Odak, S.C. and caused : 31-34. B.S.Thakur. by pod in laboratory. Legume Estimation 1982. bo~ers ~n four of losses varieties of pigeonpea. Annual Report Kharif Pulse Ent. JNKVV, Jabalpur : 37. S.N., Sarma, V.K., Sharma. 1984. Singh, R., Kanwat, P.M. and J.P. Infestation of tur pod fly Ulelanauromyza obtusa Malloch) in medium maturing varieties of pigeonpca, Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp. Ind. J. Ent. 46 (3) : 372-374. 210 Parsai, S.K., Sahu, H.R. and R.K. Chaudhary. 1990. Effect of common insecticides and synthetic pyrethroids on flowers of chickpea and pigeonpea. Ind. J. insecticides on Plant Prot. 18 (2) : 284. Patel, J.R. 1983. natural Efficacy enemies of different of Heliothis armigera Hub. and Earias vittella infesting cotton H-4 in Gujarat. Ind. J. Ent. 45 (2) : 205-207. Patel, P.S. and J.R. Patel. 1989. Efficacy of emulsifiable concentrates and dust formulations of fenvalerate in comparison to other insecticides against g.armigera Hub. and M.obtusa Mall. infesting pigeonpea. Ind. J. Plant Prot. 17 (2) : 223-226. Patel, R.C., Patel, J.C. of parasites and J.K.Patel. of Heliothis 1971. New records armigera (Hbn) Heliothis peltigera Schiff from Gujarat. Ind. ~- and ~· 33 (2) : 223-224. Patil, c.s.,Jadhav, R.G., Khaire, V.M. and U.N. Mote. 1988. Efficacy of some insecticides against pigeonpea pod borer complex. Plant Prot. Bull. (Faridabad) 40 (3-4) : 1-3. PaHar, A.D. and M.D. Ja\vale. 1977. A note on the performance of early maturing damage by pod varieties bor~rs. Res. of 'arhar' Bull. against Maharashtra Agric. Univ. 1 (8) : 127-128. Pawar, A.D. and O.P. Bhalla. 1975. Occurrence of Heliothis armigera as a serious pest of 'arhar' in Himachal Pradesh. Entomologist's Newsl. 5 ( 4) : 24. Pradhan, S. 1969. Pests of pulse crops. Insect Pests of Crops. Published by National Book Trust of India, New Delhi : 64-75. 211 s., Pradhan, Jot\~ani, M.G. and B.K. Rai. 1962. The neem seed deterrent to locusts. Indian Farming. 12 (8) 7 and 11. Prasad, Chand, D., pod P. ~1.F. and boring insects pigeon pea. J. Haque. in Res. 1989. Incidence of different Birsa Aqric. cultivars Uni v. 1 of ( 1) 79-80. Prasad, D., Chand, P. and G.P. Shrivastava. 1986. Effect of sov;ing dates on the infestation of insect pests !££· and grain yield of pigeonpea. : Pruthi, H.S. R.L. Ent. 48 (2) 230-231. 1937. Report Sci. Rep. Agric. Rabb, ~· and J.R. plants the ~· Bradley. on ~· Emperial Entomologist. 123 : 137. 1968. The influence of host parasitism ~· hornworm. of of eggs of the tobacco Entomol. 61 : 1249-52. Rabindra, R.J. and M. Balasubramanian. 1981. The effect of on diflubenzuron castor Achaea semi-looper, janata Linn. (Lepidoptera : Noctuidae) Entomon. 6 : 15-18. Rabindra, R.J. and M. Balasubramanian. 1985. Diflubenzuron, a new insecticide caterpillar, ~ for Amsacta Seminar. the groundnut albistriga Behav. hairy Walker. ~· Physical red Proc. Mgmt. Crop Pests, TNAU, Coimbatore:l61 - 166. Rajagopa1an, C.K. studies Mall.) and on J.P. the in K., ~· S,1ivaraj, P. Cajanus of Preliminary (Aqromyza cajan (L.) obtusa Millsp. nalasubrama.nian, rt., Vasudcvtln, Srinivasan. in 1965. 52 (8) : 345-346. K., K. inscct1cidcs Ent. 41 (4) infestation redgram Madras Agric. :~cl~ukannu, Devakumar. the grains : 393-394. 1979. of Residue redgram. Ind. of J. 112 ::lr~<Jh. H.u":.'"'• t·l. .ond ll, (',lt~·lilill.IJ, .J. Ho•: .• l~·'"'j·ldllilll\.ai.oli, control of toi>M'<'<> Spl)tluplt<r·,, litut".1 t-·. on c ..1td1flowc·r 1'11nj4b 1\gric, Univ. 1:., ;;., 11 Cht•rnic~tl 19110. Thont4d4ry4, .ol> iIi ty v.or·iou:. of for h 1 ;wf;bu rn i of 1:., pod p4rllsiti?.ation by C4mcron. on the C.bl.:>ckburni !!· on : P.V. and V.K. in associated Ind. J. --H.A.U. 1975. and T.S. preference R.R. Chelonu~ K.J.Hao. for 19H7b. oviposition of (flub.) infestiny different parts Sehgal. 1984. pigeonpea with : 81. Estimation of due various to stages pests insect of its crop growth. ---- Plant Prot. 12 : 127-130. Effect of date of sowing on the incidence of pod fly. Annual Report r.awat, of Cameron (llymenoptera : Braconidae) .:>rmiqera losses borc•r HO. of pi<Jeonpea. Current Research. 16 (6) Hangaiah, l9H7.o. llraconicla<') ( llymC'nopter4 'l'hontadarya, not<· II K.J.R40. pi<Jc•onpNl Curr<'n! H<'SNlrCh. 16 (6) 1<-lll•Jddhdr:ui;ill, 236-239. I 'I'.S . •1nd eggs ol<,CB 17 and s.s. Jakhmola. in grain ~ kharif pulses. PP. 22. 1967. Estimation of yield in different (Cajanus cajan) by pod losses varieties fly, of plume moth, tur pulse beetle and other means. Madras Agric. J. 54 (11) : 601-602. Reed, 11., Lateef, S.S., 1989. Sithananthan, S. Pigeonpea identification and handbook and C.S. Pav1ar. chickpea ICRISAT insect Information Bulletin No. 26. PP. 120. Rembold, H., Sharma, G.K., Czoppelt, Ch. and H. Schmutterer. 1980. Evidence with out fractions 290-297. of growth disruption in insects feeding z. inhibition Pfikrankh. by Pflaschutz. neem 87 seed ( 5/6) 213 Rice, R.E. 1969. Response of some predators and parasites of ~ confusus (LeC) to olfactory attr~ctants. Contrib. Boyce Thompson Inst. 24 : 189-94. Ridgway, R.L., King, E.G. and J.L. Carrillo. 1977. Augmentation of natural enemies for control of plant pests in the western hemisphere. Biological Control !:l Augmentation of Natural Enemies : 379-416. Rossler, Y., Bar, D., Gerling, D. and D. Gonzalez. 1975. Integrated control in cotton. Early season pests and natural enemies complexes. Proceedings, Sixth Scientific Conference of the Israel Entomological society, Tel Aviv, Israel 35-41. Ruscoe, C.N.E. 1972. Growth disruption effects of an insect antifeedant. Nature New Biol. 236 159-160. Sah, B.N. and B.P. Mehra. 1986. New record of parasites of M. obtusa Mall. in Ranchi, India. Ind. J. Ent. 48 (3) Saharia, D. and : 359. B. Dutta. 1975. Control of Helicoverpa armigera Hb., a serious pest of 'arhar' (Cajanus cajan L.) in Assam. Pesticides. 9 (8) : 34-35. Samalo, A.P. and H.P. Patnaik, 1986. Efficacy of different insecticides and their frequency of application on the pod borers Agric. J. 73 (6) sangappa, infesting pigeonpea. ~1adras : 352-354. H.K., Ali, T.M.M. and E.S. Balaraju. 1977. Efficacy of insecticides in controlling the pod borers of redgram (Cajanus cajan Mvsore J. Agric. Sci. 11 : 397-400. Sprengal). 214 Santharam, G. and Balasubramanian. M. 1980. control of Spodoptera li tura F. Note on the (Lepidoptera Noctuidae) on tobacco with NPV and diflubenzuron. Ind. Sathe, T.V., Agric. Sci. SO : 726-727. ~- Nikam, P.K., 1987. Jadhav, Influence of Exelastis atomosa Pterophoridae) on R.V. age and S.T. Phadtare. of caterpillars Walsingham (Lepidoptera parasitization by Cotesia orientalis (Hymenoptera Braconidae). Parasitology. 11 (1) : 87-88. Sathe, T.V. and M.V. Santhakumar. behaviour of of Cotesia 1988. diurnii Host Ind. J. finding (Hymenoptera Braconidae), a parasi toid of Exelastis atomosa Wal s ingham (Lepidoptera Pterophoridae) Uttar Pradesh J. zoology. 8 (2) : 105-113. Saxena, H.P. 1971. New Vistas in Pulse Production. IARI Publication : 87-101. Saxena, H.P. 1981. Insect pests of 'arhar'. Indian Farming. 31 (9) : 16-17. Schmutterer, H. and H. Rembold. 1980. Tur Wirkung einiger Reinfraktionen aus Samen von Azadirachta indica Baktivita't auf Fra Epilachna ~.Angew. Shahi, V. varivestis und Metamorphose Von (Col.: Coccinellidae). Ent. 89 (-2) : 179-188. and N.C. Pant. 1975. Effect of phorate and endosulfan treatments on growth parameters of 'mung' and 'arhar' crops. Entomologist's Newsletter. 5 ( 8-9) : 41-42. >':1:~rrna, G.K., Czoppelt, evidence sccc: of ch. and H. Rembold. insect ~r,,ctions. growth 1980. disruption Further by neem z. Angew Ent. 90 (5) : 439-444. 215 Sharma, S.K. and J.P. Chaudhary. 1984. Effect of some cultural practices on incidence of Heliothis armigera (Hub.) in pigeonpea. Haryana Agric. Univ. J. Res. 14 ( 3) : 361-365. Sheriff, N.M. and C.K. Rajagopalan. 1971. A comparative study of the intensity of infestation of the pod fly, Melanagromyza obtusa Mall., on different varieties of redgram (Cajanus cajan Linn.) Madras Agric. J. 58 (11) : 842-843. Shetgar, S.S. and S.N. Puri. 1979. Chemical control of pod borers infesting redgram. Ind. 399-401. ~· Ent. 41 (4) Shrivastava, A.S. 1964. Heliothis armigera (Hub.), a serious pest of gram. Research Memoir No. III to Govt. of Uttar Pradesh, Kanpur : 51-54. Shrivastava, A.S., Katiyar, S.S.L. and K.M. Shrivastava. Malloch. 19 71. Damage of Agromyza obtusa (Diptera Agromyzidae) to Cajanus cajan Lin crop. Labdev. J. Sci. Tech. 9 B (1) Shrivastava, A.S. and J.L. Srivastava. 71-73. 1971. Incidence of Agromyza obtusa Mall. in different varieties of 'arhar' (_£.cajan). Beitrage zur Entomologie.21 (!.:;) : 243-244. Shrivastava, K.P., Agnihotri, N.P., Gajbhiye, V.T. and H.K. Jain. 1984. Relative efficacy of fenvalerate, quinalphos and neem kernel extracts for the control of fly, Melanagromyza obtusa pod (Malloch) and pod borer, Heliothis armigera Hubner ~lillsp. Res. 8 infesting redgram, Cajanus cajan together with their residues. J. (1) : 1-4. (L.) Ent. 216 Shriv.tst.w,,, o.~;. 1'!72. Estim11tion o! loss in T-21 vAriety of 'ar·h ...·' (Cajanus c11j11n Linn). duo to 'tur' pod fly (M<!lanagromyzll obtusll Mall.) Ind. J. 1-:nt. 34 ( 1) : 82-83. SiddappaJi, c., A.R.V. 11nd G11ng11dh11raiah. 1986. of different insecticidlll spr11ys chickpe11 llcliothis 11rmiqcr11 (Hubner). Ktano~r, J·:v.1luat ion "'J••in,;t lltt• l'Psticidt•,;, 20 (l) : 13-16. Sin<Jh, ll., Pril,;ad, H. and Y.K. Mathur. 1976. Effect insecticide combination on the incidence Melana<Jromyza obtusa Mall. and on yield 'arhar' crop. Pesticides. 10 (10) : 42-43. Singh, c. Arhar', Cajanus cajan L. Millsp. Modern Technique of raising field crop. Published by Mohan Primlani for Oxford and IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd. 66, Janpath, New Delhi. PP 523. Singh, G. and J. S. Balan. 1986. Host plant and natural enemies of Heliothis armigera in Haryana. Ind. 1983. :!· Ecol. Singh, of of of 13 (1) : 175-178. H.K. and H.N. Singh. 1990. Screening of certain pigeonpea cultivars sown as kharif and rabi crop against 'tur' pod bug, C. qibbosa and pod fly, M. obtusa. Ind. J. Ent. 52 (2) : 320-327. Singh, H.M., Singh, R. and S.M.A. Rizvi. 1988. Insecticidal evaluation against pigeonpea pod borers. Ind. J. Plant Prot. 16 (2) : 217-220. Singh, J.P. and J.S. Naresh. 1981. Population dynamics of insect pests present from flowering to maturity in pigeonpea, Cajanus cajan Millsp. Thesis abstract~.~.(~.) Haryana Univ. 8 (1) : 227. 217 Singh, N.N. and L. Rai. 1981. Assessment of damage by Melanagromyza obtusa Malloch to T-21 variety of pigeonpea. Ind. J. Ent. 43 (4) Singh, N.N. and L.Rai. 1984. : 445-447. Biological of studies Melanagromyza obtusa (Malloch) on Cajanus cajan ~· (L.) Millsp. Bull. Singh, N.N. and 1985. L.Rai. insecticides spraying 25 (2) against schedules. : 156-161. Efficacy certain of pod fly under Ind. J. Ent. different 47 (3) 268-273. s.v. Singh, O.P., Kapoor, K.N., Dhamdhere, 1982. Note pigeonpea on pod and U.S. Mishra. the ovipositional behaviour fly, Melanagromyza obtusa of Mall. Ind. J. Agric. Sci. 52 (4) : 267-268. Singh, Mahal, R. ' M.S. losses and ( 2) Singh, R.N. (Linn.) and K.M. in Singh. early complex ~lillsp. and pests cajan K.M. in 1978. varieties cajan (L.) Millsp. R.N. of 1988. Assessment J. • arhar •, in Insect Sci. 1 : 168-172. pests Singh, borer by caused Cajanus cajan B.Singh. Ind.~· Singh. early (L.) 1978a. varieties Millsp: Succession of of redgram, Cajanus Ent. 40 (1) Incidence of Ind. J. S.P. and 1-6. of redgram, Ent. insect insect Cajanus 40 (3) 229-244. Singh, R.P., Singh, Y., Singh, Field evaluation of neem Juss) seed kernel Y. Singh. 1985. (Azadirachta indica A extracts against the pod borers of pigeonpea, Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp. Ind. J. Ent. 47 (1) : 111-112. 218 Singh, Y., Singh, S.P. andY. Singh. 1987. Weight loss in pigeonpea grains due to the damage of pod Melanagromyza obtusa (Malloch). (3) Sinha, ~l.M. J. Ind. fly, Ent. 49 : 355-357. and S.N. Srivastava. 1989. Spray schedule for pod borers of pigeonpea. Legume Research. 12 (2) 101-102. Sinha, M.M., Yadav, R.P. and A. Kumar 1977. Evaluation of some insecticides for the control of plume moth ( Exelastis atomosa (Melanagromyza Wal. ) obtusa and pod Malloch) on fly redgram ( Cajanus cajan). Pesticides. 11 ( 3) : 29-30. Sinha, S.N. and neem K.N. Mehrotra. (Azadirachta .!.!_. armigera Sithananthan, s. Diflubenzuron indica) infesting Sci. 58 (3) 1988. oil in chickpea. and control Ind. of Agric. J. : 238-239. 1981. Eucelatoria sp., parasitoid of Heliothis on pigeonpea. Int. Pigeonpea News!. 1: 32. Sithananthan, s., Lateef, susceptibility oviposition S.S. in and S., preference. Rao, pigeonpea V.R. pod fly the s., Rao, V.R. pigeonpea Proc. (r.lalloch), 10-16. in of India. Pod fly aspects ICRISAT of Int. : 354-361. parasites 1983. in Survey India. of Int. : 66-68. and W.Reed. pod 1980. Some ·and W.Reed. Pigeonpea News!. 2 (3) Sith.:Jnanthan, Reed. pigeon pea \'lorkshop .£!:!. Pigeonpea (2) Sithananthan, w. fly, J. 1987. Parasites of Melanagromyza Biol. Cont. 1 obtusa (1) 219 Sivaprakasam, N., A. Balasubramanian, Narayanan. parasites, 1986. G., Venkatesan, s. and Susceptibility of tachinid Eucelatoria bryani Sab. and Carcelia illata Curran to different insecticides. Madras Agric . .;!_. 73 (10) : 561-565. Sladden, D.E. and H.R. Hewer. 1928. Transference of induced food habit from parent to off spring. Proc. Roy. Soc. London Ser. B. 126 : 30-44. Smith, H.O. 1943. Laboratory rearing of Microbracon vesti ticida Vier on the bean weevil with notes on the life history of the parasite. J. Econ. Entomol. 36 : 101-104. Smith, J.M. 1957. Effects of the food plant of California red scale, Aonidiella reproduction of its aurantii hymenopterous (Mask) on parasites. Can. Entomol. 89 : 219-30. Subasinghe, S.M.C. and R.W. in Fallowes. 1978. Recent trends grain legume pest research. Legumes, Ecology and Control. Pests of Academic Grain Press, London, N.Y. PP. 41. Sundarababu, P.C., Kuppuswamy, s. and P.V. Subbarao. 1984. Control of redgram pod borers with newer insecticides. Madras Agric. J. 71 (4) : 242-245. Sundarababu, P.C. and B.Rajasekaran. 1984. Studies on the control of pod borers and pod fly on redgram (Cajanus cajan L.). Pesticides. 18 (2) : 24-26. Sundaramurthy, field V.T. 1980. population caterpillar, of of the diflubenzuron coconut Nophantis serinopa M. Gelechiidae) ncph~ntidis Effect and Muesbeck its parasite, (Hymenoptera in India. Bull. Ent. Res. 70 : 25. on a blackheaded (Lepidoptera Parasierole Bethylidae) 220 Sundaramurthy, V.T. and M. Balasubramanian. 1978. Effect of an inhibitor caterpillar on chitin (Spodoptera hyper hormone condition. 317-321. deposition litura) Z. in tobacco under induced Ang. Entomol. 85 : Surulivelu, T., Balasubramanian, G., Menon, P.P.V. and R.J. Rabindra. 1977. Efficacy of certain insecticides ln the Agric . Talati, G.M., control .:2:· 64 of (l) Upadhyay, : redgram pod borers. Madras Bhalani. 1983. 54-56. v.R. and P.A. Incidence and control of pod borers of 'Tur' in Gujarat. Pesticides. 17 (5) 21-22. Tayade, K.T. and P.R.Shivpuje. 1985. Relative toxicity of some modern synthetic insecticides against 'tur' plume moth. Maharashtra Univ. J. Res. 10 60-61. Taylor, J. S. 19 32. Report on cotton insect and disease investigation II. Notes on the American bollworm (Heliothis parasite bull. ~· obsoleta F.) on and its (Microbracon brevicornis Wesm.). Agric. f£E· Union~· Thakre, S.M., Khan, K.M. and M.N. Borle. some cotton Sci. Afr. : 113-118. 1981. Efficacy of insecticides in the control of pod borer complex on 'arhar'. "PKV Res. J. 5 (2) : 193-196. Thakur, B.S., Rawat, R.R., Verma, R.K. and A. Moitra. 1989. Influence of shape and size of pods of Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp. on the susceptibility of the pod fly, Melanagromyza obtusa Malloch and !'Ocl bug, Clavigralla gibbosa Ent. 51 (2) : 159-162. spinola. Ind. the J. 221 Thakur, R.C., Nema, K.K. and K.N. Kango. 1988. Comparative efficacy of NSK and some insecticides against the gram pod borer, H. Research. 11 (3) : 114-116. Thobbi, armigera. Legume B.V. and B.U. Singh. 1978. Control of pod fly (Melanagromyza obtusa Malloch) on pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L. Millsp). Pesticides. 12 (5) 23-24. Thorpe, W.H. and H.B. Caudle. A 1938. study of the olfactory responses of insect parasites to the food plant of their host. Parasitology. 30 523-28. Townes, H. Tripathi, Host selection patterns in some Neartic 11th, Entomol., ichneumonids. Int. Congr. Vienna. 2 : 738-41. 1960. R.K. and M.L. Purohit. 1985. Susceptibility of various pigeonpea cultivars to major pests infestation. Legume Research. 8 (1) : 35-36. Vaishampayan, S.M., Thakur, R.C. and R.R. Rawat. 1982. Phytotoxicity of carbaryl and monocrotophos on 'arhar' and soybean, Annual report (1981-82) Dept. of Entomology, JNKVV, Jabalpur (MP). PP. 22-24. Van Daalen, J.J., Meltzer, J.,· Mulder, R. and Ka. Wellinga. 1972. A selective insecticide with a novel mode 312-313. of action. Naturwisseneschaften. 59 \·arley, G.C. 1941. On the search for hosts and the egg distribution of some chalcid parasites of the knap weed gall fly. Parasitology. 33 : 47-66. 222 Veda, 0. P. 19 71. Evaluation of genetic Cajanus cajan against its (L.) ,veda, O.P., Purohit, (Ag.) M.L. susceptibility Millsp.) Millsp. important Pradesh. M.Sc. Jabalpur. to 1959. incidence 'arhar' Mall.) on (Cajanus and Madras Agric. J. Verloop, A. and C.D. of 46 (3) Varietal cajan (L.) obtusa Mall., Heliothis armigera early sowings fly (Agromyza (Cajanus Ferrell. Madhya : 7-9. redgram pod redgram in 1975. Melanagromyza Influence of resistance pests N.K.Sood. Hub. JNKVV Res. J. 9 (l-2) R. 'arhar' , thesis submitted to JNKVV, Exelastis atomosa Wlsm. Veeraswamy, for insect and of stock of indicus, on the obtusa spreng.). : 99-101. 1976. Benzoylphenylurea's a new group of larvicides interfering with chitin deposition. ACS Symposium Series No. 37. Pesticide Chemistry in the 20th century. Verma, N. u. K. 19 83. Studies on insect pests of 'arhar' , Cajanus cajan Millsp. with particular reference to screening losses (Ag.) of caused thesis by germplasm pod and estimation infesting submitted to insects JNKVV, of M. Sc. Jabalpur l-129. Vinson, S.B. 1976. Host selection by Parasitoid Host Selection Vishakantaiah, M., Jayrajaramaiah, insect parasitoids. 109-133. M. and B.L.V. Gowda. 1973. Observations on tur pod fly, Melanagromyza obtusa Malloch (Diptera Agromyzidae) Mysore. Mysore Current Research. 2 (8) : 62. in 223 Weseloh, R.M. 1971. Influence of gypsy moth egg mass dimensions and microhabitat distribution on parasitization by Ooencyrtus kuwanai. Annals Entomol. Weseloh, Am. 65 : 64-69. ~· R.M. 1974. Host-related microhabitat preferences of the gypsy moth larval parasitoid, Parasetigena agilis. Environ. Entomol. 3 : 363-64. Yadav , C.P., Lal, s.s., Dias, C.A.R. and R.Nigam. 1983. Field tests of monocrotophos for control of the pod fly, Melanagromyza obtusa Malloch infesting pigeonpea. Yadav , C.P., Host Lal, Indian~· s.s .. , evasion, suppressing Plant~· ll : 6-8. Dias, C.A.R. a and R.Nigam. l983a. approach for prospective Heliothis damage. Int. Pigeonpea Newsl. 2 (3) : 62-63. Yadav, C.P., Lal, S.S. and J.N. Sachan. 1988. Assessment of incidence and crop loss due to pod borers of pigeonpca (Cajanus cajan) of different maturity groups. Ind. ~· Agric. Sci. 58 (3) : 216-218.
© Copyright 2024