Sex Discrimination: What it Looks Like in 2015 2015 Employment Law Conference – Session 1 Prepared by: Susan M. Steward Cerritos • Fresno • Irvine • Pasadena • Pleasanton • Riverside • Sacramento • San Diego The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission • Federal agency dedicated to stopping and remedying employment discrimination on the basis of: • Sex • National Origin • Pregnancy • Age • Race • Disability • Color • Genetic Information • Religion 1 History of the EEOC • 2015 marks the 50th anniversary of the EEOC • Created by the Civil Rights Act of 1964 • Officially opened for business on July 2, 1965 • Franklin D. Roosevelt, Jr. appointed as first EEOC Chairman 2 © 2015 Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo 1 History of the EEOC • First EEOC ruling regarding sex discrimination – Unlawful under Title VII to have separate "help wanted" sections for men and women (1965) • EEOC noted lack of public consensus and Congressional guidance on sex discrimination issues • First EEOC decision on a charge of sex discrimination – Corporate policies requiring firing of female employees when they marry violate Title VII (1965) 3 Current Role of the EEOC • Current jurisdiction over employment discrimination issues including: – Equal Pay Act of 1963 (Fair Labor Standards Act) – Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”) – Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 – Rehabilitation Act of 1973 – Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978 (Title VII) – Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (“ADA”) – Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 – Lily Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009 4 Strategic Enforcement Plan 2013-2016 • Enforcement Priorities – Eliminate Barriers in Recruiting and Hiring • Target class-based exclusionary recruitment and hiring practices that allegedly steer individuals into specific jobs due to their status in a particular group – Enforce Equal Pay Laws • Target gender discrimination in compensation systems 5 © 2015 Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo 2 Strategic Enforcement Plan 2013-2016 • Enforcement Priorities – Protect Vulnerable Workers by Targeting • Disparate pay, job segregation, harassment, human trafficking, and discriminatory policies affecting vulnerable workers who may be unable or unwilling to enforce their rights – Prevent harassment through systemic enforcement and targeted outreach • Systemic investigations and litigation to deter workplace harassment – Preserve Access to the Legal System 6 Strategic Enforcement Plan 2013-2106 • Sex-Based Claims Remain a Priority – Continued aggressive enforcement of laws prohibiting discrimination and harassment based on sex • 29.4% of EEOC claims filed in 2014 contained a claim for sex-based discrimination – Represents a decrease of less than 1% in sexbased claims since 1997 – Sex-based discrimination claims are not likely to abate during 2015 7 Sex Discrimination and the EEOC: 2015 • Three Focus Areas – Equal Pay, Benefits, and Terms/Conditions of Employment – Pregnancy Discrimination and Related Issues re Accommodation – Emerging Issue: LGBT Rights 8 © 2015 Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo 3 Focus on Equality in Pay, Benefits, and Terms/Conditions of Employment Equal Pay Act • Requires equal pay to men/women who perform jobs requiring equal skill, effort, and responsibility and are performed under similar working conditions in same establishment Title VII • Prohibits compensation discrimination based on sex (as well as race, color, religion, national origin, age, and disability) Lily Ledbetter Act • Establishes that the 180-day statute of limitations for filing equal-pay lawsuits resets with each new paycheck affected by discriminatory action 9 Focus on Equality in Pay, Benefits, and Terms/Conditions of Employment • Litigation on behalf of male employees – EEOC v. Ruby Tuesday, Inc. • EEOC alleges male employees denied lucrative summer employment at Park City, Utah • Employer cites concerns about housing male and female employees together 10 Focus on Pregnancy Discrimination and Related Accommodation Issues • EEOC Enforcement Guidance on Pregnancy Discrimination (2014) – Described when employers’ actions may constitute unlawful discrimination on basis of pregnancy, childbirth, and/or related medical conditions in violation of Title VII, as amended by PDA – Clarified obligation of employers under PDA to provide pregnant workers equal access to employment benefits – Opined that PDA requires employers to treat women affected by pregnancy or related medical conditions the same way as nonpregnant applicants or employees of similar ability/inability to work 11 © 2015 Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo 4 Focus on Pregnancy Discrimination and Related Accommodation Issues • EEOC Enforcement Guidance on Pregnancy Discrimination (2014) – Title I of the ADA applies to individuals with pregnancy-related impairments • Pregnancy itself is not a disability • Impairments related to pregnancy can be disabilities if they substantially limit/limited one or more major life activities • Pregnant workers regarded as having disabilities are protected 12 Focus on Pregnancy Discrimination and Related Accommodation Issues • EEOC actively pursues pregnancy-related violations, including: – Refusal to hire and failure to promote pregnant workers • EEOC v. High Speed Enterprise, Inc. dba Subway • EEOC v. The WW Group, Inc. dba Weight Watchers – Demoting or firing pregnant workers – Discharging workers who take leave for pregnancy-related conditions (such as miscarriage) • EEOC v. Platinum P.T.S. Inc. dba Platinum Production Testing Services 13 Focus on Pregnancy Discrimination and Related Accommodation Issues • EEOC actively pursues pregnancy-related violations, including: – Limiting employment opportunities for pregnant woman • Involuntary leave • Refusal to allow work beyond a certain point in pregnancy • Reducing work hours • Limiting work assignments – EEOC v. Noodles Asian Bistro, Inc. – Requiring medical clearances not required of non-pregnant workers • Latowski v. Northwoods Nursing Center 14 © 2015 Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo 5 Focus on Pregnancy Discrimination and Related Accommodation Issues • EEOC actively pursues pregnancy-related violations, including: – Failing to accommodate pregnancy-related work restrictions where similar accommodations are/would be available to non-pregnant workers • EEOC v. Step Three Ltd. – Refusing to allow lactating mothers to return to work • EEOC v. Houston Funding – Retaliating against pregnant employees (or those close to them) who complain about pregnancy discrimination • EEOC v. Engineering Documentation Sys., Inc. 15 Emerging Issue: Focus on LGBT Rights • No explicit protections under Title VII, but the EEOC has been active in federal sector: – Tracking gender identity and sexual orientation issues – Issuing federal sector decisions finding gender identity-related and sexual orientation discrimination complaints can be brought under Title VII through EEO complaint process – Issuing guidance for processing discrimination complaints by federal LGBT employees – Assisting federal agencies to develop gender transition policies and plans 16 Emerging Issue: Focus on LGBT RightsLitigation by EEOC • EEOC v. Lakeland Eye Clinic, P.A. – Alleged termination because employee is transgender • EEOC v. R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes Inc. – Alleged discrimination due to transitioning from male to female • EEOC v. Boh Bros. Constr. Co. LLC – Alleged male subjected to same sex verbal and physical harassment 17 © 2015 Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo 6 Emerging Issue: Focus on LGBT RightsAmici Curiae Briefs Filed by EEOC • Chavez v. Credit Nation Auto Sales, LLC – EEOC argued it erred by not initially accepting transgender individual’s charge of discrimination • Lewis v. Highpoint Reg’l Health Sys. – EEOC argued discrimination against a transgender individual for non-conformance with gender norms is sex discrimination • Muhammad v. Caterpillar Inc. – EEOC argued Title VII's anti-retaliation rule protects individuals who in good faith oppose sexual-orientation discrimination in the workplace 18 Related Issue: Rights of Same-Sex Couples Under FMLA • DOL’s revised definition of “spouse” under FMLA – Effective March 27, 2015 – FMLA benefits available to same-sex couples if legally married in a state that recognizes same-sex marriage • “State of Residence” vs. “Place of Celebration” for all married couples 19 Related Issue: Rights of Same-Sex Couples Under FMLA • Department of Labor (“DOL”) revised definition of “spouse” under FMLA – Response to U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down part of the Defense of Marriage Act which said a marriage must be between a man and a woman • United States v. Windsor (2013) 133 S.Ct. 2675 • Same sex leave rights under CFRA – Same sex marriages – Registered domestic partners 20 © 2015 Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo 7 Sex Discrimination Litigation is Alive and Well in California Rosario Juarez v. AutoZone Stores, Inc. (U.S. District Court, San Diego) Ellen Pao v. Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers LLC (San Francisco Superior Court) 21 Conclusion: • Employers can expect the EEOC to continue aggressive investigation of charges of discrimination • Especially where there exist “systemic barriers to equal opportunity” • Employers should train managers and supervisors to recognize and prevent discrimination and harassment • Employers should conduct timely & effective investigations into claims of harassment and discrimination and take appropriate remedial action 22 Thank You © 2015 Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo 8
© Copyright 2024