HR INSIGHTS J U LY / A U G U S T 2 0 1 5 Magazine f ro m t h e e ye s o f i n d u st ry l e a d e r s It’s Time for HR PROS MARKETING HATS to Put on Their In This Issue Will Big Data Make Interviews Obsolete? Engaging an Older Workforce Don’t Ignore These 4 Recruiting Trends A Bully of a Boss Is Bad News for the Entire Team & More FROM YOUR PARTNERS W H E R E V E R YO U FI N D YO U R S E L F D U R I N G T H E S E D O G DAY S O F S U M M E R as you flip through these pages—sitting at your desk in an air-conditioned office, relaxing on a tropical beach, or meeting a colleague for lunch, for example—we are confident that this issue of Accrue Partners HR Insights will give you plenty of great ideas to carry you into the second half of 2015. In this issue’s feature article, “It’s Time for HR Pros to Put on Their Marketing Hats,” Charles Coy writes, “Although HR pros have been told for some time to adopt a marketing mindset, only now do they actually have the tools to start following that advice. By using data-driven insights and inbound strategies, HR leaders can build long-term relationships with potential candidates—whether they’re looking for a job today or a year from now.” Rather than start from scratch, Coy suggests, HR should borrow a few strategies from the marketing folks. Mike McKerns echoes that theme in “Increasing Unsolicited Referrals in HR,” describing how the strategies that bring lucrative sales referrals can also help HR departments and staffing firms win high-quality employee referrals. With 2016 on the horizon, you’ll definitely want to keep your eye out for any upcoming regulatory changes that will go into effect in the new year. In “Balancing ACA Compliance, Coverage Options, and Cost Containment in 2016,” J. Marshall Dye offers an overview of some of the ways employers can comply with the Affordable Care Act, such as minimum essential coverage plans and minimum value plans and advises organizations on how to prepare for new regulations coming next year. As you mull over what the future holds for your organization, we at Accrue Partners are here to help you identify the optimal goals for your organization—and advise you on strategies for reaching them. Whether you already have specific questions in mind or want to explore some vague possibilities, we’d love to chat with you! Best Regards, BUILDING PEOPLE, COMPANIES AND CAREERS Patty Comer & Amy Pack Principal Partners of AccruePartners 2 J U LY / A U G U S T 2 0 1 5 Accounting & Finance + Information Technology + Engineering + Financial Services + Human Resources + Office + Marketing + National Recruiting Center FEATURES 4Cover Story It’s Time for HR Pros to Put on Their Marketing Hats by Charles Coy 7Balancing ACA Compliance, Coverage Options, and Cost Containment in 2016 by J. Marshall Dye 10A Bully of a Boss Is Bad News for the Entire Team By Ravi Mikkelsen DEPARTMENTS 4 Workforce Management 12 W ill Big Data Make Interviews Obsolete? By Ira S. Wolfe 14 D on’t Ignore These 4 Recruiting Trends By Callie Apt 16 E ngaging an Older Workforce By Valerie Grubb Learning & Development 18 M ake Corporate Learning Resemble the Online Shopping Experience By Sharlyn Lauby Leadership 20 W hat HR Can Learn from Effective Sales Proposals By Stephanie Reyes 10 Ask the Expert 21 Designing Assessments By Strategic Human Resources, Inc. Water Cooler Chronicles 22 Increasing Unsolicited Referrals in HR By Mike McKerns Recipe of the Month 22 A Summer Staple, Redux: Potato Salad Niçoise 18 16 HR INSIGHTS 3 HR INSIGHTS f ro m the eyes of ind u s t r y l e a d e r s Publisher & EDITORIAL DIRECTORS Mamu Media, LLC Editor in Chief Mike McKerns Managing Editor Addy Fillman Contributing Editor Associate Editor Lindsay Brockway director of Sales Robert S. Herbein III Marsha Brofka-Berends Contributing Writers Callie Apt Charles Coy J. Marshall Dye Valerie Grubb Sharlyn Lauby Ravi Mikkelsen Stephanie Reyes Strategic Human Resources, Inc. Ira S. Wolfe Design The Office of Kristian Bjørnard It’s Time for HR PROS MARKETING HATS to Put on Their BY CHARLES COY 4 J U LY / A U G U S T 2 0 1 5 Companies are racing to build conversations around their brands by investing in content marketing and bolstering their social media presence. But brand-building efforts aren’t limited to the marketing department: HR, too, can engage in organic marketing—and reap its benefits. Recruitment used to be a one-way conversation. Companies blasted job postings and controlled the conversation when viable candidates applied. Today, that approach is going out the window, says Marvin Smith, talent community strategist at Lockheed Martin. “We’re starting to change this transactional nature of talent acquisition to more of a nurturing, relationship-building approach.” Although HR pros have been told for some time to adopt a marketing mindset, only now do they actually have the tools to start following that advice. By using data-driven insights and inbound strategies, HR leaders can build longterm relationships with potential candidates—whether they’re looking for a job today or a year from now. HR INSIGHTS 5 New research on job posting messaging underscores the need for recruiters to add some marketing finesse to their tactics. A recent study 1 in the Journal of Business and Psychology found that online job postings that focused on the upsides an employer could offer delivered both higher quality candidates and more candidates than postings with flat job descriptions. Similarly, the study found that ads featuring “needs-fit” content (things that the organization can offer, such as work autonomy and career advancement) performed nearly three times as well as others with “demands-abilities” language (wording that describes what skills the employer is looking for). But job postings are just a small piece of the puzzle, says Shannon Smedstad, employment brand director at CEB, an advisory company based in Arlington, Virginia. “Savvy recruiters and talent-acquisition teams are using more data-driven insights in order to approach their recruitment strategy,” she says. The two data points she considers most important are where talent originates and where the highest quality hires are found. “Understanding where people and top talent come from can really help you reallocate your budget resources; it can help you allocate your time resources,” Smedstad says. 1Joseph A. Schmidt Derek S. Chapman, and David A. Jones. 2015. “Does Emphasizing Different Types of Person-Environment Fit in Online Job Ads Influence Application Behavior and Applicant Quality? Evidence from a Field Experiment.” Journal of Business and Psychology, 30(2), 267–282. 6 J U LY / A U G U S T 2 0 1 5 Marketing departments depend on CRM systems and automation platforms (such as HubSpot and Marketo) to gather this kind of data about their customers and act on it. “We think about a pipeline or a funnel. How do we have people come into that funnel, and how do we keep them in orbit when they’re not ready to buy?” Smith says. People in the HR talent pipeline aren’t buying goods or services, but they might be in the market for a new career. Marketing has shifted from “spray-andpray” tactics that involve mass distribution of messages over a short time period to longterm relationship-building with potential customers so that the brand is top of mind if and when they make a purchase. These longterm relationships are what Smith and his colleagues want to achieve in recruitment. For example, he built an online community called Military Connect for Lockheed Martin that features relevant professional advice and networking opportunities for veterans and military personnel considering the transition to civilian life. The underlying strategy is essentially a content marketing approach, in which companies use the community to share and discuss brand-relevant (but not sales-y) information with their audiences. Rather than start from scratch, why not adapt marketing strategies from the people who know them best? “If your marketing team is doing marketing well, you’ve got a gold mine there,” suggest Smedstad. “You can just ask somebody to have coffee with you and talk about marketing concepts or your company’s brand or the company’s positioning.” Although Smedstad has no professional marketing background, she’s learned some tricks of the trade by talking with marketing professionals and networking with peers online. For Smith, the Holy Grail of “HR marketing” is the ability to connect all the dots around potential hires. Right now, he feels frustrated when his team lacks vital information (such as someone’s e-mail address). Soon, he says, we’ll see platforms that not only capture holistic information about candidates, but automate some of the process around engaging them for extended periods of time. “We’re beginning to realize that we have to have a relationship with those folks, that we’re going to need over the next 10 to 20 years, or it’s not going to work out for us very well.” Charles Coy is the senior director of analyst and community relations at Cornerstone. Responsible for evangelizing about Cornerstone’s innovation in talent management technology solutions, he is interested in the ways that technology can affect how organizations evaluate, motivate, and value their employees. He can be reached via Twitter at @oleskoo. Balancing ACA Compliance, Coverage Options, and Cost Containment in 2016 BY J. MARSHALL DYE As we pass the midpoint of 2015, thousands of organizations across America are still adjusting to the dramatic changes brought on by the highly complex and ever-changing Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA), the most sweeping healthcare legislation in our country’s history. With half a year under our collective belts since employer mandates took effect, both organizations that use staffing companies and the staffing firms themselves are still sorting through changes to health and benefit plans, pondering the impact of new rules and regulations, and preparing for expanded reporting requirements, higher costs, and unpredictable participation levels. But the entire system could be turned upside down this summer when the United States Supreme Court hands down a decision on King v. Burwell. (As of this writing, a decision had not yet been announced.) If the plaintiffs, who argue that the ACA allows for subsidies to be granted only on state-run (and on not federal) exchanges, win their case, some experts predict that as many as five million Americans who obtained coverage through federal exchanges could lose their tax credits and, potentially, their health insurance coverage in dozens of states. More ominously, as the administratively burdensome ACA caps insurers’ administrative expenses while requiring benefits to be uncapped, major medical plans across the country are now experiencing significant rate increases this renewal season. These mandated regulations are expected to result in unsustainable pressure on private major medical plans operating outside of government-subsidized exchanges. The certainty of unacceptable rate increases will force many companies to relinquish their group plans and allow their employees to obtain affordable (and potentially subsidized) coverage at exchanges. HR INSIGHTS 7 ACA REQUIREMENTS: A QUICK REFRESHER All employers (both your organization and your staffing firm) are subject to “employer shared responsibility” (also known as “pay or play”) requirements that became effective on January 1, 2015. The requirements apply to all “applicable large employers,” defined as those with 100 or more full-time and full-time-equivalent employees in 2014. In 2016 that threshold drops to employers with more than 50 such employees during 2015, thus significantly expanding the number of affected firms. Employers are ACA compliant if they elect to “pay” the tax penalty and not offer their employees minimum essential coverage or minimum value coverage that meets the minimum standards of the ACA. In 2016 these large employers will be subject to a non–taxdeductible excise tax if at least one full-time employee qualifies for subsidized coverage from a public health insurance exchange. Under what is termed the “pay option,” employers that do not offer minimum essential coverage (MEC) to at least 95% (up from 70% in 2015) of full-time employees and their dependent children under age 26 will be assessed a monthly excise tax of up to $2,000 annually, multiplied by the number of the employer’s full-time employees (excluding the first 80). Employers are also ACA compliant if they “play” by offering an employee-paid minimum essential coverage (MEC) plan, which is an ACA-compliant, ERISA-qualified, employer-sponsored plan covering 63 preventive and wellness services. Completely voluntary with no employer contribution required, self-funded MEC plans eliminate the $2,000 (A) tax, but leave open the possibility of the $3,000 (B) tax being assessed for full-time temporary associates who apply for and receive a federal subsidy. Covered services may include screening for medical conditions, counseling, vaccinations for children, and certain supplements; some MEC plans pay 100% of preventive and wellness services as required by the ACA. Employees who enroll in an MEC preventative and wellness plan are ineligible to receive a subsidy at a government exchange. Employees who decline to enroll in an MEC offering are eligible to go to the exchange and receive a subsidy to purchase comprehensive major medical insurance. 8 J U LY / A U G U S T 2 0 1 5 Lastly, employers are also ACA compliant if they “play” by offering a minimum value (MV) plan. Minimum value is defined as major medical insurance that achieves an actuarial value of at least 60%. An MV plan must include the 63 ERISA-qualified preventive and wellness services constituting MEC, as well as unlimited benefits for inpatient and outpatient services, including services by physicians and mid-level practitioners, hospital and emergency visits, pharmacy items, and laboratory and imaging tests. In 2016 MV plans must include full in-patient hospitalization coverage. These benefits must have no annual or lifetime maximum. (First-generation MV plans that initially met the 60% actuarial value requirement without inpatient benefits are grandfathered for 2015. At the end of 2014 such plans were deemed as no longer meeting minimum value requirements.) An MV plan must also be affordable to the employee, with the ACA stipulating that the employee portion of the cost of an MV plan cannot exceed 9.5% of his or her income (thus leaving the employer responsible for the majority of the plan cost). Offering an MV plan eliminates both the employer mandated $2,000 (A) tax and the $3,000 (B) tax. Companies that offer an MV plan render their employees ineligible to receive a subsidy at a government exchange, whether or not the employees enroll in the employersponsored MV plan. Plans purchased at the exchanges with subsidies can cost an employee as little as 2% of his or her income. Subsidies for family coverage purchased at the exchange can be significant. Whether they “pay” or “play,” companies have a huge financial stake in strategically deciding how they will ensure ACA compliance, provide coverage options to valued employees, and still manage the cost to their organization. THE COMPLEXITIES OF ADMINISTRATION AND REPORTING For many organizations and their staffing firms, the handling of enrollment, administration, and reporting presents the greatest difficulties in managing an ACA-compliant program. The reporting challenge for a staffing firm is real: with an average annual employee turnover rate of 400%, a staffing firm has four times the number of employees to track and report on in a 12-month period than a non-staffing company of equal size. With crushing IRS penalties for noncompliance, the staffing company must engage competent service providers to assist in managing data required by the ACA. Into this breach have stepped such organizations as Equifax and Insurance Applications Group, which have introduced new technologies to streamline enrollment, simplify look-back measurements, and facilitate essential reporting needed to ensure ACA compliance and avoid penalties. The best of these solutions provide a suite of capabilities that streamline and simplify administration and reporting for firms. Such capabilities may include cost-evaluation tools, variablehour estimators, administrative tools, employee portals, enrollment engines to manage acceptances and declines, comprehensive reporting capabilities, and even an “audit log” to map processes, integrate systems, and document ACA compliance. NEW BENEFIT PLAN OPTIONS EMERGING Major national companies have stepped forward with enhancements to such existing product offerings as fixed indemnity plans, MEC wellness and preventive plans, and MV plans that, in varying combinations, may provide compliance and cost control as well. Yet as companies begin to examine their benefit offerings for 2016 to ensure ACA compliance and cost control and to provide coverage options to workers—and as the deadlines for 2016 renewals rapidly approach—exciting new benefit plan options are emerging. Among the most exciting new developments are bronze-level MV plans that are fully ACA-compliant, eliminate both employer (A) and (B) taxes, and include full in-patient hospitalization coverage. SERVICE MAKES A DIFFERENCE In late 2014, in an effort to avoid ACA penalties, thousands of organizations waited until the eleventh hour to select plans, resulting in an unprecedented surge of implementations in extremely compressed periods. Reflecting on their experiences during that time, smart employers are considering benefits providers who have added support staff and expanded training to answer questions and process claims. These employers are also asking tough questions about how to judge the service delivery of benefits providers. As you consider your plans, inquire about what service metrics a provider monitors and how it has performed on those metrics. As key indicators of the provider’s offerings, look for positive trends in such areas as rate of first-call resolution of an employee’s inquiry, average speed to answer calls, percentage of claims processed within 14 days, and growth rate in total calls received. If your benefits partner will not or can not provide such figures (or doesn’t monitor such critical metrics at all), consider expanding your search until you find a partner who can give you this information. Striking the right balance between providing acceptable and attractive benefit coverage options while controlling costs—and ensuring ACA compliance—will not be easy in 2016, but solutions are emerging. As you consider changes to your health and benefit plans, contemplate ever-shifting rules and regulations, and prepare for expanded reporting requirements, tailor your strategy wisely. Now more than ever, it’s critical to partner with staffing providers that understand the staffing industry and the regulatory environment, and have a documented track record of performance. J. Marshall “Jay” Dye is the president and CEO of Insurance Applications Group and Essential StaffCARE, the largest provider of ACA-compliant health plans and supplemental employee benefits to the staffing industry. He is a third-generation leader in the employee benefits insurance industry and an award-winning member of the National Association of Health Underwriters. He can be reached at [email protected]. THE IMPORTANCE OF OFFERING A FIXED-INDEMNITY PLAN WITH YOUR ACA OFFERING Fixed-indemnity plans have long been a staple of the staffing industry as a way to help employees who may be unable to afford the high premiums, deductibles, and copays of traditional major medical insurance plans. The best such plans feature no deductibles, no copays, and no clauses that place limits based on preexisting conditions; provide coverage for doctor office visits and prescriptions; and are designed to cover the majority of an average employee’s day-to-day medical expenses. Such plans are designated “excepted” benefits, do not affect an employee’s ability to receive ACA subsidies, and do not constitute minimum essential or minimum value coverage. They do, however, play a very important role in the new world of the ACA and the future of employer-sponsored benefit plans. These plans provide day-one coverage of basic healthcare needs, filling the gaps of high-deductible and high-out-of-pocket plans obtained from exchanges or an employer. HR INSIGHTS 9 A OF A BULLY BOSS ENTIRE % TEAM @ * IS BAD NEWS FOR THE The saying “People join companies and leave bosses” holds more truth than ever before, with over 50% of today’s job seekers planning to leave their current jobs sometime this year because of their bosses. Psychological and mental abuse is one type of negative behavior that some bad bosses engage in, and because of the power imbalance inherent to the boss-employee relationship this bullying can have particularly nasty consequences in the workplace. Just as a cold can spread silently from one person to another, the toxic effects of one person’s bullying can spread through a team and quickly cause it to fall apart. 10 J U LY / A U G U S T 2 0 1 5 A bullied employee definitely shows signs of disengagement and lower productivity. But those impacts aren’t limited to one person. A recent study 1 conducted by researchers at Michigan State University and the University of Western Australia showed how these negative work effects are transmitted and mutated throughout the rest of the team, thus leading to greater intra-team conflict. In an interview2 published in MSU Today, the lead investigator, Crystal Farh, commented on the results (which were based on analyses of 51 teams in 10 companies in China and a laboratory study involving close to 300 people in the USA): “It’s not just about individual victims now. It’s about creating a context where everybody suffers, regardless of whether you were individually abused or not.” © alphaspirit / BigStock BY RAVI MIKKELSEN % & * ! @ & *@ # %* !& % @ % # # IMPACTS OF ABUSE AND A HOSTILE WORK ENVIRONMENT Fahr’s team found that nonabused members of a team modeled their behavior after their boss’s actions and began treating one another poorly, with the boss’s target bearing the brunt of the extra abuse. Fahr explains, “Teams characterized by relationship conflict . . . are hostile toward other members, mistreat them, speak to them rudely, and experience negative emotions toward them.”3 A dysfunctional team may be the result of the employees having their own behavioral conflicts, or it may be the result of the team leader abusing one or more team members. Finding out the source of the dysfunction can help companies provide more positive and more productive work environments and create longer-tenured employees in the process. Another important cause of employee stress and conflict is that it’s human nature to let the interests of “the team” override our personal moral compasses. This tendency is evident in the nasty and often violent clashes between fans of opposing sports teams, supporters of political parties, and members of ethnic and religious groups, for example. You may think, “But those are different situations. In business, we’re working toward a common goal.” To that I would respond, “When we’re truly working toward a common goal, then there won’t be any of these conflicts.” Like every other collection of humans, a business becomes a tribe, a close-knit community of employees. When competition is directed outward (e.g., the rivalry between Apple and Google), the employees within one group help each other in order to protect “us” from “them.” But when competition is internal—between departments or between members of a single team, for example—the employees fight among themselves, thus hurting the company as a whole. To better understand this behavior, scientists at Carnegie Mellon University; the University of California, Berkeley; and MIT have been looking at the functioning of the brain when a person self-identifies as either an individual or as a member of a team.4 Testing the hypothesis that people “lose touch” with themselves and their personal moral values when part of a group, the researchers found that brain activity decreased when people engaged in competitive behavior in groups (as opposed to individually). In an MIT press release,5 Mina Cikara, the lead author of the study, explains some of their findings: This process alone does not account for intergroup conflict: Groups also promote anonymity, diminish personal responsibility, and encourage reframing harmful actions as “necessary for the greater good.” Still, these results suggest that at least in some cases, explicitly reflecting on one’s own personal moral standards may help to attenuate the influence of “mob mentality.’” THE BOSS SETS THE BAR FOR THE TEAM Good leaders will see the devolution of the group into such mob behavior and work to correct it. Bully bosses, on the other hand, will exacerbate the problem by supporting their favorites and further abusing the employees they dislike. From the CEO down through each layer of management, every leader sets the tone for how the individuals beneath him or her will behave and is ultimately responsible for the atmosphere in which people work. A boss sets an example— whether it’s good or bad—for the entire team. Take a close look at your organization. Have any employees complained of verbal or emotional abuse from their superiors? If you are working with those colleagues to help them cope with the abuse, that’s great. But don’t forget that before anyone can truly recover from a bully boss, you’ll need to do more than provide a sympathetic ear. In addition to addressing the boss’s conduct, you’ll also need to rehabilitate the entire team so that they do not continue any of the counterproductive behaviors they learned from the bully. Ravi Mikkelsen is the CEO and cofounder of jobFig (www.jobfig.com), an HRfocused behavioral analytics startup in San Francisco. A lifelong entrepreneur and nomad, he has been involved with startups in three countries on two continents and has lived in nine different cities. 1.Crystal I. C. Fahr and Zhijun Chen. 2014. “Beyond the Individual Victim: Multilevel Consequences of Abusive Supervision in Teams.” Journal of Applied Psychology. 99(6), 1075–1095. 2.2014. “Abusive Leadership Affects Entire Team.” MSU Today. msutoday.msu.edu/ news/2014/abusive-leadership-infects-entire-team/. 3.2014. “Abusive Leadership Affects Entire Team.” MSU Today. msutoday.msu.edu/ news/2014/abusive-leadership-infects-entire-team/. 4.M. Cikara, A.C. Jenkins, N. Dufour, and R. Saxe. 2014. “Reduced Self-Referential Neural Response during Intergroup Competition Predicts Competitor Harm,” NeuroImage. 96(2014), 36–43. 5.Anne Trafton. 2014. “When Good People Do Bad Things.” MIT News. newsoffice.mit.edu/2014/when-good-people-do-bad-things-0612. HR INSIGHTS 11 WORKFORCE MANAGEMENT Will Big Data Make Interviews Obsolete? BY IRA S. WOLFE Once upon a time, hiring the right employee was a relatively easy and inexpensive process, requiring only a job application and a quick interview. Attitudes were fairly predictable, replacements cost a dime a dozen, and the cost of doing business easily absorbed hiring mistakes. Today, however, hiring is more complicated, thanks to bigger risks and more complex (and constantly changing) jobs. Attitudes toward work vary tremendously from generation to generation. And the cost of making a hiring mistake falls right to the bottom line. Most companies still rely on interviews and reference checks as predictive tools. But using them for hiring is like trying to douse a burning building with a garden hose: both are woefully inadequate for the job. ALL INTERVIEWERS ARE BIASED In a recent Fast Company article, psychologist Heidi Grant Halvorson pointed out, “Everyone [must] get past the idea that only blatant racists, misogynists, and homophobes are biased. If you have a brain, you are biased. End of story.”1 Even if a manager is a skilled interviewer, he or she is susceptible to personal bias about gender, skin color, age, hairstyles, tattoos— nearly anything you can see or hear. That’s just human nature. Most of us try our best to block out bias, but it’s impossible to do so completely. THERE’S NO GOLD STANDARD FOR INTERVIEWS The criteria for successful hiring interviews are rarely tracked, because few people conduct interviews exactly the same way. Even when managers use the same questions, personal styles affect how they ask them and how they hear the responses. Based on only the interview, it is impossible to track what makes one candidate more successful than the next. The interview is just too subjective, and when it’s the primary selection tool most companies have no clue how or why a manager selects one candidate and rejects another. 12 J U LY / A U G U S T 2 0 1 5 People in Office ©iStock.com/mediaphotos 1Heidi Grant Halvorson. 2015. “How to Recognize (and Overcome) Your Unconscious Biases in Hiring.” Fast Company. www.fastcompany.com/3043074/ how-to-thwart-your-unconscious-biases-when-hiring-a-diverse-team. Hiring then becomes a crapshoot. Each recruiter and hiring manager has a different baseline, and each hiring event recreates the wheel. With the lack of a universal standard, it is nearly impossible to replicate success. CANDIDATES AREN’T CAUGHT OFF GUARD In addition to manager bias and personal style, the candidate also has a part in the interview equation. Most candidates put in a fair amount of time and effort preparing for the hiring process. For example, it’s not unreasonable to assume that a candidate has practiced and polished her interview performance, possibly with help from career coaches. (Or that a candidate’s resume has been exhaustively reviewed by others and his cover letter ghostwritten. ) The amount of time a candidate invests in preparing for an interview is typically far more than what most managers imagine. For many managers, an interview is just another meeting or disruption in their busy schedules, and they want to get through it as quickly as possible so they can move on to “more important” things (such as working on a budget or putting out the next fire). But for candidates, the interview is a make-or-break moment they have rehearsed in their heads countless times. HOW BIG DATA CAN BEAT THE ANTIQUATED INTERVIEW Fortunately, big data offers some relief for these hiring issues. Preemployment testing, in which large databases of candidate information are analyzed, can fill information gaps and neutralize personal biases. Through sophisticated algorithms that can analyze patterns and trends from thousands of people and sift through combinations of data for predictive trends that an individual couldn’t catch, preemployment tests add objective and predictive metrics to the sea of subjectivity upon which managers now base hiring decisions. With access to big data available to almost anyone who wants it, the playing field for talent is almost level. Managers can figure out what makes top performers tick, why mediocre performers miss expectations, where the good talent is hiding, and how to attract the best employees. Locating future talent and figuring out how to attract and retain it is an endless journey. By exploring the possibilities of big data, a company can take another step toward achieving those goals. Ira S. Wolfe is a nationally recognized thought leader in talent management and an expert in pre-employment assessment testing, workforce trends, and social media. Wolfe is president of Success Performance Solutions (www.succcessperformancesolutions.com), a pre-employment and leadership testing firm he founded in 1996. He is the author of several books, including Geeks, Geezers, and Googlization; The Perfect Labor Storm 2.0; and Understanding Business Values and Motivators. He can be reached at [email protected]. HR INSIGHTS 13 WORKFORCE MANAGEMENT DON’T IGNORE THESE RECRUITING TRENDS BY CALLIE APT 4 Over a decade ago, I took my first corporate job: a summer internship in the HR department of a large government contractor. In that position (which was my first exposure to the recruiting process), I helped recruiters with the laborious task of reviewing and scanning hundreds of paper resumes to be recorded in the company’s applicant tracking system. I also hand delivered resumes to various hiring managers. Thanks to technological advances, the days of printed paper CVs, resumes, and job classifieds are long gone. Although the foundations of recruiting remain unchanged, new strategies emerge each day. Whether you’re a manager looking to add a few people to your team or a human resources professional looking to grow your organization’s recruiting pipeline, you’ll want to take careful note of these four current trends in recruiting. R HT E USE IS KEY CE N E I R E E XP 1 1. The user experience is key. We’ve all been there before: you spend half an hour manually cutting and pasting your resume into an online application, only to lose all of your work and have to start over. When that happens, many applicants quit the whole process in annoyance—and that could be a missed opportunity for organizations. According to a 2012 Career Builder survey,1 42% of candidates who have a negative application experience say they would never consider employment at that company again. You can get more from applicants by asking less of them. For example, instead of creating an arduous online application process that is as painful as filing a tax return, consider incorporating one-click application capabilities. Also, ask candidates and colleagues for their opinions on the recruiting process. By finding out what your candidates are thinking, you can continually fine tune your processes and create a user experience that attracts top talent. 1CareerBuilder. 2013. “Seventy-Five Percent of Workers Who Applied to Jobs Through Various Venues in the Last Year Didn’t Hear Back From Employers, CareerBuilder Survey Finds.” CareerBuilder. www.careerbuilder.com/share/aboutus/pressreleasesdetail.aspx?sd=2%2F20%2F2013&id=pr740&ed=12%2F31%2F2013. 14 J U LY / A U G U S T 2 0 1 5 2LinkedIn. 2014. 2015 Global Recruiting Trends. business.linkedin.com/content/dam/business/talent-solutions/global/ en_US/c/pdfs/recruiting-trends-global-linkedin-2015.pdf. 3Meghan M. Biro. 2014. “Smart Recruiting Strategy Drives Relationships and Conversation.” Forbes. 3 August. www.forbes.com/sites/meghanbiro/2014/08/03/smart-recruiting-strategy-drives-relationships-and-conversation/. G N I T I U R EC M R E L I B M O IN S T R E A IS M A G N I T I U CR E R E V I PASS ATTERS M ON T I T I N G CO P TALEN E R D N G A TAIN—TO N I D R A REW T—AND RE AC 4 R T T A HE L P 3 2 2. Mobile recruiting is mainstream. The shift from online recruiting to mobile recruiting is just as significant as the shift from print classifieds to online job postings. (This isn’t surprising, considering that the average person checks his or her phone about 150 times per day!) In fact, more than half of all candidates searching for jobs do so from their mobile devices, so companies would do well to keep those potential employees in mind. Just as a bad mobile experience can deter shoppers from giving their business to a particular retailer, a bad mobile experience can also deter job seekers from applying to a particular organization. So consider optimizing your mobile career portal: make it possible to schedule interviews through the site, post videos that feature your corporate culture and brand, and allow candidates to video-chat and interview with recruiters. “We predict that mobile recruiting will continue to rise, especially because Millennials are expected to make up 40% of the workforce by 2020,” said Anji Nilsson, manager of recruiting at O.C. Tanner. 3. Passive recruiting matters. According to LinkedIn’s 2015 Global Recruiting Trends report,2 75% of global professionals consider themselves “passive”: they aren’t actively looking or applying and don’t become interested until someone contacts them about an opportunity. A recent article in Forbes pointed out, “Surveys have shown that over 93% of the top performers in their field do not find a job through a job posting; instead they are referred by someone they know, such as a friend or networking contact.”3 Consider, too, that passive talent is often less likely to need skill development, because those individuals have the desire and ability to get up and running quickly. These two data points underscore the importance of having a passive recruiting strategy. Yet just over half of global companies currently recruit passive candidates, which means that some of the best candidates out there remain untapped. Passive recruiting can be as simple as getting to know people on Twitter or reading and commenting on their blog content. Social platforms such as LinkedIn (the fastest growing global source of hire) have features that allow recruiters to reach out to passive candidates and invite referrals from their own connections. Hiring expert Lou Adler, best-selling author of the Performance-Based Hiring series, says that the two key elements of coming up with a passive recruiting strategy are finding out how the best candidates get their positions and then finding out how the best recruiters find and hire those candidates. 4. Rewards and recognition help attract— and retain—top talent. Numerous surveys have shown that job seekers and employees consistently rank “appreciation for my work” at or near the top of the list of attributes they seek in their jobs. It’s so important, in fact, that is it usually tops “attractive salary.” Recognition is no longer just a nice workplace perk—it’s now a mandatory retention strategy. The ability to find top talent is arguably a company’s best competitive advantage—and one of HR’s greatest challenges. Creating a great candidate user experience, investing in mobile recruiting, adding a passive recruiting strategy, and leveraging employee recognition can take your recruitment strategies to the next level. As O.C. Tanner’s strategic proposal manager, Callie Apt is passionate about crafting winning proposal strategies. She enjoys collaborating with diverse teams in sales, marketing, and product development to put forward solutions that help her clients celebrate great work. She can be reached at [email protected]. This article was originally published on O.C. Tanner’s blog, ‘a’ Magazine (www.amagazinedaily.com). HR INSIGHTS 15 WORKFORCE MANAGEMENT ENGAGING AN OLDER WORKFORCE BY VALERIE GRUBB A great deal has been written on how companies need to prepare for the knowledge exodus as Baby Boomers retire in droves. However, the reality is that Boomers aren’t retiring in the numbers originally expected. Instead, older workers are the fastest-growing demographic in the workforce! In recent years, the average retirement age has steadily been creeping up, and Baby Boomers are expected to push it even higher. A recent Gallup Poll 1 indicated that 24% of Boomers plan to retire at age 65, with another 49% expecting to retire at 66 or older. Further supporting this trend are statistics from the U.S. Labor Department that indicate that by 2020, 25.2% of the labor force will be age 55 and over (up from 11.9% in 1990).2 What does that mean for companies? Baby Boomers will continue to work alongside their current Generation X and Millennial colleagues and will still be around when Generation Z joins the workforce. Senior leaders, managers, and HR professionals need to be prepared to manage a workforce spanning four generations with wildly different ideas about work ethic, work/life balance, and long-term career goals, among many other issues. ADAPTING TO AN AGING WORKFORCE When managing workers of any age, it’s important to understand their motivations and what rewards they value. After all, “you get what you reward,” as the old saying goes. While younger workers may be gunning to get that next big promotion as quickly as possible, older workers (more than other age groups) typically prioritize an environment in which they’re valued and respected for their knowledge and experience. Older workers often also value a more flexible work environment that requires fewer hours but includes more vacation time and maintains their benefits. (The latter is particularly important to employees near retirement who aren’t yet eligible for Medicare). 16 J U LY / A U G U S T 2 0 1 5 For example, realizing that about 50% of its 18,000 employees would be over 50 by the year 2020 (today that age group makes up about 25% of the workforce), in 2007 German automaker BMW sought advice from the workers on one manufacturing line and numerous “technical experts” on how to redesign the factory floor for an aging workforce. In all, BMW’s “Today for Tomorrow” project led to 70 changes. They included laying new floors, outfitting workers with special shoes, installing easier-to-read computer screens, letting laborers sit instead of stand, and piping in more daylight.3 Eventually these and other changes spread through the entire company. By adapting the workplace for an aging demographic, BMW has figured out how to keep its experienced—but aging—workforce around longer, thereby preventing productivity drops caused by en masse retirement. Phased retirement is another strategy that organizations can use to manage the loss of older workers. In 2013 the U.S. Office of Personnel Management introduced a phased retirement program in which employees work half the number of full-time hours (while still earning retirement benefits) and spend 20% of their time mentoring junior employees. This gradual approach to phasing out workers ensures the continuity of business operations and reduces training expenses associated with bringing new employees up to speed. Private companies (such as San Diego–based Scripps Health, Cinergy, and MITRE Corporation), too, are slowly adopting their own phased retirement programs. Companies are also implementing policies that provide the perks that older workers desire in order to keep those workers around longer. The Snowbird Program at CVS Caremark, for example, lets employees transfer to stores in other regions on a seasonal basis. Through this program, older employees who would otherwise have retired get to spend the winter months in warmer climates (a big reason for retirement) while still staying with the company. Organizations are increasingly recognizing the need to implement programs to keep their older workers on board longer. A 2010 survey of HR professionals conducted by the Society for Human Resource Management in conjunction with AARP found that 60% of their organizations had programs designed to keep older workers around (and that many of the companies that lacked such programs anticipated putting some in place). Employer Str ategies Percentage currently using Percentage who anticipate using Offering part-time positions Hiring retirees as consultants or temporary workers Offering flexible work arrangements for older workers Encouraging employees to work past traditional retirement age Providing training to upgrade skills Instituting phased retirement Providing opportunities to transfer jobs with reduced pay and responsibilities Establishing alternative career tracks © iStock.com/Aleutie Based on slide 16 of Society for Human Resource Management and AARP. 2010. SHRM-AARP Strategic Workforce Planning Poll. www.shrm.org/research/surveyfindings/articles/pages/shrmaarpstrategicworkforceplanning.aspx. As these examples demonstrate, organizations can provide numerous options for their aging employees other than an abrupt departure. Just as many HR professionals learned when dealing with Millennials, engaging older workers in a conversation about their needs is the critical first step toward meeting the needs of this demographic. After all, when it comes to motivation and engagement, one size never fits all. MANAGING PERCEPTIONS In addition to offering programs to attract and retain older workers, it’s important for HR departments to facilitate smooth interactions among the generations. Encouraging employees to ditch blanket generalizations is a good first step. HR can also take several other specific actions. Training In this case, training must go both ways: younger managers can learn how to motivate and engage older workers, and more seasoned employees can learn how best to approach a supervisor who is younger than them. As you design your training programs, keep the following in mind: ·· It is a common misconception among new managers that they must know all the answers from the moment they’re promoted. Teach your junior managers that it’s okay (and expected) for them to consult with their employees. With that information in hand, a manager’s job is to set priorities and goals, then engage employees of all ages on how to reach those goals. Encourage junior managers to seek guidance from senior employees (who may have insight on what works in the organization’s culture) and take advantage of their knowledge and experience to learn and to make better decisions! ·· With older workers, don’t ignore the elephant in the room: have an open discussion about how, regardless of anyone’s age, it can be hard for someone to work for a manager who knows less than he or she does. Teach senior employees how to approach a less seasoned manager to offer suggestions without threatening that person’s authority or making him or her feel unqualified to lead. Accommodation of Different Learning Styles Boomers ushered in the era of fax machines, whereas Millenials grew up with the Internet. Each generation’s experience with technology can shape its different learning styles. So be sure to build training that accommodates multiple learning methods, including in-person, online, and self-paced programs. Reverse Mentoring When most of us think of mentoring, we typically picture a senior executive helping a more junior employee. This arrangement certainly has its benefits, particularly if an older team member is interested in transitioning to fewer hours. However, reverse mentoring, in which a junior team member helps a more seasoned employee, can enable older workers to learn the latest trends or technology they need to know to stay current. In any mentoring relationship, be sure to set goals, identify measurable outcomes, and celebrate achievements. Multiple communication methods Using multiple communication methods is smart business within any team. When big age gaps among team members exist, however, sending messages via several platforms can be especially useful for making sure that everyone gets the same message. IMs, texts, e-mail, written memos—use them all to ensure that you reach all teams via their preferred communication methods. SUMMARY Each generation brings a unique set of skills into the office. Fostering an environment of open communication with understanding and respect for those differences will go a long way toward strengthening a company’s ability to remain competitive in the marketplace. The Baby Boomers are here to stay for a while, alongside their successors. So don’t just watch this scenario play out on its own—take action now! A workforce strategy that addresses the presence of aging employees head-on can demonstrate how age diversity (with the differences and similarities it brings) can create stronger companies. Valerie Grubb of Val Grubb & Associates Ltd. (www.valgrubbandassociates.com) is an innovative and visionary operations leader with an exceptional ability to zero in on the systems, processes, and personnel issues that can hamper a company’s growth. Grubb regularly consults for mid-range companies wishing to expand and larger companies seeking efficiencies in back-office operations. Her expertise and vibrant style are also in constant demand for corporate training classes and seminars. She can be reached at [email protected]. 1Jim Harter and Sangeeta Agrawal. 2014. “Many Baby Boomers Reluctant to Retire.” Gallup. www.gallup.com/poll/166952/baby-boomers-reluctant-retire.aspx. 2Mitra Toosi. 2012. “Labor Force Projections to 2020: A More Slowly Growing Workforce.” Monthly Labor Review. January, pp. 43–64. www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2012/01/art3full.pdf. 3Isabelle de Pommereau. 2012. “How BMW Reinvents the Factory for Older Workers.” The Christan Science Monitor. 2 September 2012. www.csmonitor.com/World/Europe/2012/0902/How-BMW-reinvents-the-factory-for-older-workers. HR INSIGHTS 17 LEARNING & DEVELOPMENT Make Corporate Learning Resemble the Online Shopping Experience BY SHARLYN LAUBY At the spring 2015 symposium held by Chief Learning Officer magazine, I attended a panel discussion about creating and sustaining a culture of learning. As the panelists (who included global leaders in talent and learning from Qualcomm, Hilton Worldwide, Procter and Gamble, the Vanguard Group, and ADP) described their organizations’ approaches to learning, it occurred to me that their words echoed some of what I hear from marketing executives about getting customers to buy products and services. 1 In today’s business world, we say that the buying experience must be customer-centric in order for a purchase to happen and that the customer experience is key. The same approach applies to learning, too: in order for corporate learning to be engaging, it needs to be learner-driven. That might not sound very revolutionary, but the reality is we don’t always design training that way—even when we know we should and want to do so. Sometimes the objective or the budget drives the design, instead of the learner determining the form of the training. So how can we put the learner at the center of learning? Here are five ideas inspired by when I heard during that panel discussion: Give employees a single source for learning. People like to be able to go to one place to find everything they need. (That’s why so many shoppers just go straight to Amazon.) When one company discovered that its employees were searching Google for answers to their questions, management decided to employ a similar “one-stop shopping” strategy for learning by giving employees access to a variety of training options (e.g., in-house learning programs, off-the-shelf learning programs, MOOCs, etc.) housed in a single location. 2 18 J U LY / A U G U S T 2 0 1 5 Let employees see training evaluations. Just as shoppers look at reviews when researching a purchase, employees should be able to see workshop ratings when deciding which programs to attend. Adopting this policy is a bold move that makes learning designers and facilitators more accountable. 3 Treat all training (even compliance training) as voluntary. Employees should understand what information is essential for them to do their jobs effectively, and there should be no need to coerce them into attending training. When all training is voluntary, designers must make learning compelling, because if a program doesn’t deliver on its description, the employees will leave. 4 5 Provide employees with systems that have great search capabilities. There’s nothing more frustrating than being unable to find something on a website because the site is slow and clunky or its search function is inadequate. Now more than ever, user experience is key, and websites and apps need to be intuitive. Want to improve your user experience? Ask ten of your employees to find a certain program in your learningmanagement system, watch how they search for it, and make changes based on what you observe. Embrace mobile and create an internal app store. I love that some of the apps I use not only tell me how to use them most effectively but also recommend other apps I can use in concert with theirs. Help employees maximize their productivity by pointing them to mobile apps that will benefit them. (Be sure to give them choices: many people like Evernote, but plenty of others prefer OneNote, for example.) And ask power users to share tips and tricks. If you want people to buy your product or service, you need to give them what they need. Now it’s time to apply that same philosophy to corporate learning. If you want your employees to engage with training (or with anything, for that matter), they need to drive the learning experience. © okea / veer.com Sharlyn Lauby is the author of HR Bartender (www.hrbartender.com), a friendly place to discuss workplace issues. When not tending bar, she is president of ITM Group, Inc., which specializes in training solutions to help clients retain and engage talent. She can be contacted on Twitter at @HRBartender. HR INSIGHTS 19 LEADERSHIP What HR Can Learn from Effective Sales Proposals BY STEPHANIE REYES It demonstrates to prospective clients that you fully understand the issues they’re facing and that you “get” what matters to them. An effective sales proposal has the following characteristics: It provides supporting evidence and a clear rationale that can serve as justification for the prospect’s decision to commit. Most importantly, an effective sales proposal reflects the challenges and needs of the prospective client and focuses on overcoming those challenges and satisfying those needs. To be successful, the proposed solution should help the prospect solve problems, achieve objectives, and look good to the rest of the organization. A good proposal doesn’t just list the features of the products and services being offered and it never attempts to force a prospect to buy. So what do effective sales proposals have to do with HR? Aside from the fact that the actions and influence of HR have a direct impact on the way staff treat customers, the HR function itself involves a lot of persuasion. HR must ·· persuade employees to follow policies, complete training, and resolve differences; ·· persuade managers to complete performance reviews on time, provide appropriate feedback to team members, and address performance molehills before they become mountains; and ·· persuade executives to incorporate HR planning at a strategic level, support leadership and other employee development initiatives, and provide an adequate budget to fund competitive and discretionary compensation. 20 If HR professionals learned to incorporate the fundamentals of sales proposals in communications with the people they’re seeking to persuade, they might overcome some of the resistance they commonly face. For example, consider what happens when the word “employee” replaces the word “customer” in the following guidelines for writing an effective sales proposal: It persuades the prospective client that you have the expertise, competence, and support to deliver an optimal solution effectively and professionally. ·· Clearly demonstrate the employee’s perspective in your solution. ·· Address your employee’s issues and concerns and provide clear solutions for each. ·· Cite your employee’s name and needs frequently [throughout the proposal]. ·· Mention the employee before you mention your organization in paragraphs and sentences. ·· Focus on the benefit to the employee rather than on the many great features of your solution. Not every HR interaction involves persuasion. Sometimes, HR must simply communicate policies and enforce rules. But as Mary Poppins would say, “A spoonful of sugar helps the medicine go down.” In much the same way, the art of persuasion and a few basic sales proposal techniques can help elevate some of HR’s challenging conversations to win-win propositions. Good salespeople understand that potential customers are people first and that, as the old saying goes, “people don’t care how much you know until they know how much you care.” Effective HR practitioners know that employees, too, are people first and become adept at persuading others by understanding their needs and focusing on what matters to them. Stephanie Reyes writes for TribeHR, a NetSuite company, the first truly social human resources management software. Its easy-to-use tools are used by businesses worldwide, allowing companies to focus more on what they do best and less on things that get in the way. For more information, visit www.tribehr.com. hand & marker: ©iStock.com/kyoshino ASK THE EXPERT DE SIGNING ASSE SSMENTS INC. BY STRATEGI C HUM AN RESO URCE S, Q.My company is in the chemical manufacturing industry, and the different jobs involve many processes (e.g., checking temperatures and pressures, evaluating the raw materials used). I would like to design an assessment to measure the ability of technicians and other workers to handle those tasks. How do I determine what competencies are required for each task and design such an assessment? — A.The creation and implementation of any type of assessment that involves job competencies must include the following steps: 1. Observe and record how the best employees in each job category do the work. 2. Based on the information gained from your observations, identify and clearly define the key competencies (e.g., problem solving, communication). 3. To ensure that the identifications and definitions are accurate, have some of the relevant employees and supervisors review the competencies. 4. Once the competencies are identified and defined, develop assessment simulations that replicate the work being done. To pilot the center or assist in the development of the assessments, choose employees who already have the competencies. 5. Schedule trainees or potential employees to go through the assessments. 6. Track the results by measuring employees’ knowledge before and after they take the assessments. Does the assessment system seem to be working? Do you need to make any changes to it? Does the system promote or produce any bias or discrimination?? Depending on your location, you may need to conduct a number of pilot studies and analyses of the results to ensure that using the assessments for hiring or promotion decisions has no legal ramifications. Remember to be consistent in your use of the assessments. Don’t pick and choose whom you will ask to take them; instead, chose a stage of the employment process where everyone must do them. Strategic Human Resources, Inc., is a national full-service HR-management firm based in Cincinnati, Ohio. Its president and founder, Robin Throckmorton, can be reached at [email protected]. HR INSIGHTS 21 A SUMMER STAPLE, REDUX WATER COOLER CHRONICLES: INCREASING UNSOLICITED REFERRALS IN HR BY MIKE MCKERNS The arrival of summer heralds the return of the outdoor dining season. Whether you’re grilling on the back deck, picnicking in a park, or gathering with friends for a poolside potluck, you’ll want a delicious dish that makes a great impression but doesn’t wilt in the heat. Enter the classic summer dish known as the potato salad! If you grew up eating only mayonnaise-based potato salads, summer is a great time to expand your repertoire with this vinaigrette-based version. Just a bit of time in the kitchen yields a tasty dish that travels well (picnic, anyone?), works as a terrific side for grilled fare, and is hearty enough to serve as a main course all by itself. © arenacreative / BigStock Last spring I had a conversation with a colleague about the Holy Grail of marketing success: the unsolicited referral. Our discussion focused on the importance of those referrals in marketing and business development. But when putting together this issue, with its feature article about how HR needs to adopt some marketing strategies, I realized that the same principles that lead to unsolicited referrals in marketing can also be employed in the talent and recruiting fields. In any field (whether it’s sales and business development or HR), developing the following areas will directly affect how often you receive unsolicited referrals. ·· Culture. This is where it all starts. If you want your employees to become your recruiters, you need to make sure that they view the company as much more than a job or a paycheck. By building a culture that encourages fun, hard work, and common goals, you also build a strong culture that fosters employee loyalty and commitment. ·· Pride. Now more than ever, your employees want to be able to tie their company and the work they do to a greater good. If you’re having a tough time making that connection between your people and the positive impact of their work, forget about what your company makes or does and focus instead on what you and your employees can do for the community. What you’ll need: 3 large potatoes, scrubbed and unpeeled 1 ½ cups of fresh green beans, trimmed 1 large tomato, cut into wedges 1 red pepper, julienned 2 hard-boiled eggs, quartered For good reason, this list contains absolutely no mention of a referral bonus: unsolicited referrals have nothing to do with money. And although financial incentives do a great job of increasing the quantity of referrals, increasing the payout has no effect on the quality of referrals you receive. If you keep your focus on the quality of your efforts, you’ll build a strong reputation that will bring even more unsolicited referrals your way. Mike McKerns, SPHR, is the editor in chief of HR Insights and cofounder of Mamu Media LLC. He can be reached at [email protected]. 22 POTATO SALAD NIÇOISE ·· Process. Have you ever referred a friend for a job, then didn’t get any status updates from the recruiter until you followed up on the referral yourself? (When I found myself in that situation, I vowed never to send another friend into that company’s referral black hole!) If your employees are referring potential candidates, having an established process in place to communicate the status to the referring employee on a weekly basis is essential if you want to keep those referrals coming. Also, communicating to the referrer why you’re not considering his or her contact will help increase the quality of the referrals you receive from that referrer in the future. J U LY / A U G U S T 2 0 1 5 Water: ©iStock.com/Grafissimo Yield: 6 servings Time: 30 minutes NUTRITIONAL INFO PER SERVING: Calories: 388 cal Fat: 22 g Dietary fiber: 10 g Sugars: 3g Protein: 8g 4 artichoke hearts, halved 12 black olives 1 Tb capers 2 Tb white vinegar 2 tsp mustard 2 Tb finely chopped shallots ½ cup extra virgin olive oil salt and pepper Directions: 1. Cut the potatoes into ½-inch cubes, then cook them in 2 quarts of boiling (and salted) water until they are fully cooked but still firm (about 15 minutes). Drain them and let them cool. 2. While the potatoes cook, blanche the green beans in a second pot of boiling (and salted) water until they are just barely cooked but still bright green and very firm (about 3 or 4 minutes), then drain them and let them cool. 3. In a large serving bowl, combine the potatoes, green beans, tomato, red pepper, eggs, artichoke hearts, black olives, and capers. 4. In a small bowl, whisk together the vinegar, mustard, and shallots. Then add the olive oil, whisking constantly until the vinaigrette is fully emulsified. 5. Pour the vinaigrette over the other ingredients, stirring gently until everything is well combined. Season with salt and pepper to taste. Innovative Leaders in Staffing & Executive Search BUILDING PEOPLE, COMPANIES AND CAREERS. ACCOUNTING & FINANCE | INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY | ENGINEERING FINANCIAL SERVICES | HUMAN RESOURCES | OFFICE | MARKETING CALL US TODAY TO FIND YOUR IDEAL CANDIDATE OR CAREER. 704.632.9955 | www.accruepartners.com GROWING WITH OUR CLIENTS IS WHAT WE ARE ALL ABOUT! EXPAND. GROW. REACH FURTHER. Headquartered in Charlotte, NC, AccruePartners has rapidly grown from a local Charlotte company to a national organization – delivering Staffing and Executive Search solutions to clients across the United States. With an entrepreneurial framework to respond more effectively and the bandwidth to deliver on a national level, AccruePartners consistently competes and delivers as a Tier 1 vendor against publicly traded billion dollar staffing companies. It is the persistence of the “AccruePartners Business Systems” that has delivered unparalleled success in recruitment, as well as outstanding results in client delivery. VISIT WWW.ACCRUEPARTNERS.COM/NRC TO LEARN MORE! 704.632.9955 1000 West Morehead, Suite 200 Charlotte, North Carolina 28208 www.accruepartners.com
© Copyright 2024