2014 ANNUAL REPORT 2014 The Ombudsman of Belize THE FOURTEENTH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE OMBUDSMAN Page | 0 “Truly a Haven of Democracy” 2014 ANNUAL REPORT The Ombudsman of Belize Prepared for laying before the House of Representatives and the Senate of Belize pursuant to Section 28(2) and (3) of the Ombudsman Act, Chapter 5 of the Substantive Laws of Belize (Rev. Ed. 2000) Page | 1 2014 ANNUAL REPORT The Ombudsman of Belize TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE NO. Presentation to the National Assembly .......................................................... 3 Ombudsman’s Message ..................................................................................... 5 Summary of 2014 Complaints ......................................................................... 7 Special Report ................................................................................................... 16 Resolution of Complaints ................................................................................ 19 Freedom of Information Applications........................................................... 21 Institutional Collaboration............................................................................... 23 Trainings and Conferences .............................................................................. 26 Administrative Matters..................................................................................... 31 Conclusion ......................................................................................................... 34 Appendices ........................................................................................................ 37 1. Statistics......................................................................................... 39 2. How to Make a Complaint.............................................................. 46 3: The Investigative Process................................................................... 47 4: The Ombudsman Act, Key Provisions ............................................. 48 Page | 2 2014 ANNUAL REPORT The Ombudsman of Belize Ref: 001/AROMB/2014 The Office of the Ombudsman 91 Freetown Road, Second Floor P.O. Box 1376 Belize City, Belize Central America Tel: 501-223-3594 / 501-223-3198 Fax: 501-223-33198 Email: [email protected] th 18 February, 2015 Hon. Marco Pech President of the Senate National Assembly Belmopan Dear Mr. President, I have the honour to present the Ombudsman’s Fourteenth Annual Report which covers the period of January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014. The report is submitted in accordance with Section 28(2) of the Ombudsman Act, Chapter 5 of the Substantive Laws of Belize, which states: “The Ombudsman shall submit to the National Assembly an annual report relating generally to the execution of his functions.” Respectfully, ___________________ Lionel Arzu, MSc. Ombudsman of Belize Page | 3 2014 ANNUAL REPORT The Ombudsman of Belize Ref: 001/AROMB/2014 The Office of the Ombudsman 91 Freetown Road, Second Floor P.O. Box 1376 Belize City, Belize Central America Tel: 501-223-3594 / 501-223-3198 Fax: 501-223-33198 Email: [email protected] th 18 February, 2015 Hon. Mike Peyreffite Speaker of the House of Representatives The National Assembly Belmopan Dear Mr. Speaker, I have the honour to present the Ombudsman’s Fourteenth Annual Report which covers the period of January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014. The report is submitted in accordance with Section 28(2) of the Ombudsman Act, Chapter 5 of the Substantive Laws of Belize, which states: “The Ombudsman shall submit to the National Assembly an annual report relating generally to the execution of his functions.” Respectfully, _____________________ Lionel Arzu, MSc. Ombudsman of Belize Page | 4 2014 ANNUAL REPORT The Ombudsman of Belize OMBUDSMAN’S MESSAGE Once again, it is my pleasure to present to the National Assembly the Fourteenth Annual Report on the execution of my functions for the past year. My functions are essentially two-fold. My primary function is to investigate complaints of alleged wrongdoings by public authorities pursuant to the Ombudsman Act, Chapter 5, Substantive Laws of Belize (Rev. Ed. 2000). My secondary function is to review decisions of public authorities denying access to information requested pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act, Chapter 13, Substantive Laws of Belize (Rev. Ed. 2000). This report provides a concise summary of the events that unfolded in 2014 in the exercise of these two functions. The Fourteenth Annual Report contains a statistical summary of the two hundred and twenty (220) new complaints received during the course of the year. This summary is grouped according to: authorities complained against; geographical origins of complaints; subject matter of complaints; and, the status of these complaints. Although it is my second year in Office, it is quite clear that the trend is consistent with previous years, in terms of both the number and nature of the complaints. This report also summarizes applications under the Freedom of Information Act. For the first time in the recorded history of our office, three applications for review were made under this Act. Although the applications were either denied or did not progress far, the fact of the applications being made quite possible signals a movement towards making public authorities more accountable, transparent and fair to all citizens when carrying out their administrative functions. The year 2014 was one of increased collaboration among our colleagues and even with the very authorities complained against. Collaboration was in the area of complaints resolution; prison reform; criminal justice reform; and, strengthening Government’s accountability in combating gender based violence. It was also a year in which I seized the opportunities to promote to foreign and local dignitaries the agenda for my term in office. I believe that the fulfilment of this agenda will enable my office to better carry out its mandate. In 2014, my staff and I participated in training events, either as facilitators or as participants. Topics were very important and current, and included subjects such as the law and health care; case management and negotiation; mediation; and antitrafficking in persons. This report provides a summary of these training events and conferences. Page | 5 2014 ANNUAL REPORT The Ombudsman of Belize The year 2014 also saw some changes to our office. We welcomed a new Legal Officer, as the outgoing one preferred to pursue a career in private practice. I take this opportunity to thank Attorney-at-law Oscar Selgado for his service to the Office of the Ombudsman and wish him well in his new endeavour. The Ministry of Finance approved the employment of a Security Officer to provide personal protection to my staff and me. My Office welcomed Miss Kimberlyn Marin to the team as our new Office Cleaner. She replaced Miss Gilda Leslie, who retired after twelve years of service to the Office of the Ombudsman. I want to take this opportunity to thank Miss Leslie for her service and wish her all the best in her retirement. Despite these welcomed changes, fundamentally, my office continues to operate within the parameters of limited human and financial resources. Even so, the Office made significant accomplishments during the past year. Finally, I wish to thank the National Assembly, the Government of Belize and the Judiciary for this honour and responsibility of being the Ombudsman, a partner in ensuring the protection of fundamental human rights and freedoms. I also wish to thank my own staff for their hard work and dedication. This Fourteenth Annual Report is presented not only as a report pertaining to the execution of my functions but also as a summary of the public opinion on current administrative practices. Furthermore, it is hoped that this report will help to promote (additional) reforms in public administration. I hope you enjoy reading this report and look forward to your continued support for the work of the Office of the Ombudsman and a productive and brighter 2015. Your Humble Servant I Remain, ______________________ Lionel Arzu, MSc. Ombudsman of Belize Page | 6 2014 ANNUAL REPORT I. SUMMARY OF 2014 COMPLAINTS 1.0 The Ombudsman’s primary function is to investigate complaints from private citizens regarding wrongdoing, abuse, injustice or injury they have suffered at the hands of public authorities. The Ombudsman Act states: Subject to the provisions of this Act, where the Ombudsman has reasonable cause to believe that: (a) An authority or an officer of member of an authority has been guilty of corruption or other wrongdoing; or, (b) Any person or body of persons has or may have sustained injustice, injury or abuse as a result of any action taken by an authority or an officer or a member of such authority, arising out of or connected with the exercise of the administrative functions of that authority (whether before or after the commencement of this Act), the Ombudsman may investigate the action so taken.1 1.1 In 2014, private citizens made a total of two hundred and twenty (220) new complaints against the public authorities. This number is comparable to previous years, both in terms of the number and nature of the complaints made 1SectiSSection 12 (1), Ombudsman Act The Ombudsman of Belize The following is a breakdown of the complaints by Authorities; Geographical Origin; Subject-Matter; and Status. AUTHORITIES 1.2 The Ombudsman is allowed to investigate authorities. The Ombudsman Act defines authorities as follows: (i) A Ministry, Department, or Agency of Government; (ii) The Belize Police Department; (iii) Other statutory authority; or body or (iv) A company registered under the Companies Act being a company in which the Government holds not less than fifty-one per centum of the ordinary shares and so declared by the National Assembly.2 Although the word “public” is not expressed in the Act, it is reasonably implied from the provisions and purpose of the Act. 1.3 Please note that the total number of authorities complained against will not necessarily be equal to the number of complaints made since one complaint may be made against more than one authority. 2Section 2(1) (a) – (d), Ombudsman Act Page | 7 2014 ANNUAL REPORT In 2014, the Ombudsman received complaints against the following authorities: (i) City, Town and Village Councils throughout Belize; (ii) Public Hospitals and Clinics The Ombudsman of Belize Figure 1. Complaints, by Ministry or Branch of Government (iii) Human Services Department (iv) Immigration and Nationality Department (v) Lands and Survey Department (vi) Police Department (vii) Prisons Department (viii) Public and Teaching Services Commission (ix) Family and Magistrates Court (x) Supreme and Appeals Court 1.4 The largest number was against the Ministry of National Security As shown in Figure 1 below, fiftyeight per centum (58%), more than half of all complaints were made against this Ministry. Furthermore, Figure 2 shows that the majority of complaints against the Ministry of National Security, eight-nine per centum (89%) or 116 complaints, were against the Police Department. Figure 2. Complaints, Ministry of National Security Police Department Defense Force Coast Guard Prisons Department 2% 1% 8% 89% Page | 8 2014 ANNUAL REPORT The Ombudsman of Belize 1.5 The second and third largest numbers of complaints were against the Lands and Survey Department of the Ministry of Natural Resources and Agriculture and the Judiciary, respectively. be equal to the total number of complaints made (220) because some complainants may make more than one allegation against one authority and others the same allegation against more than one authority. Please see Appendix 1 for additional statistics. MINISTRY SECURITY GEOGRAPHICAL ORIGIN 1.8 Complaints against the Belize Police Department were the most common. The subject matter or allegations of these complaints are the following: 1.6 Complaints originated from all six of Belize’s political and administrative districts. However, one hundred and sixteen (116) in all, more than half, originated from the Belize District. The other districts accounted for relatively small percentages of complaints. Cayo District came in a distant second with thirty-one (31) complaints. The least number of complaints originated from the Corozal District. Please see Appendix 1 for additional statistics. SUBJECT MATTER 1.7 Complainants made a number of allegations of wrongdoing, injustice or injury against the authorities above-mentioned. 3 The subject matters of these complaints vary widely. The more frequently mentioned ones are summarized below. Please note that the number of allegations made will not necessarily 3Section (i) OF NATIONAL Unwarrantable violence, ranging from aggravated assault to murder (ii) Misconduct, from corruption to falsifying police statements to disciplinary offences such as drunken and disorderly behaviour in public (iii) Non-investigation of reports of crimes, whether intentional or negligent (iv) Unlawful search and seizure (v) False imprisonment and Malicious Prosecution (vi) Identification errors, including mistaken identity on a police record 2(1) and 12(2), Ombudsman Act Page | 9 2014 ANNUAL REPORT (vii) Theft, misappropriation and damage or destruction of property including property held as exhibits Complaint 898 A mother from Belmopan complained that police officers and villagers conspired to murder her son, a known mentally ill man living in Big Falls, Toledo. Policemen showed up in a vehicle at the victim’s house and fatally shot him, purportedly in selfdefence. The victim died shortly after being transported to the Punta Gorda Public Hospital. Police investigation is ongoing. Complaint 1030 A young, Belize City man applied to the Police Department for a copy of his police record, for employment purposes. His record showed drug-related charges. The complainant insisted it was not him but someone else with the same name and similar attributes. After finger-printing analysis, the complainant was exonerated and his record cleared. Complaint 890 A young mother living in Belize City complained that members of the Police Department refused to enforce a Protection Order in her favour. Her husband was remanded pending trial for the attempted murder of a minor. At the time of the attempted murder, the husband was in breach of a protection order. The complainant feared for her safety when she found out that the accused was applying for bail. The police arrested and imprisoned the accused when he received bail, but was later released in disregard of the Domestic Violence Act of Belize, Act No. 19 of 2007, Laws of Belize. The Ombudsman of Belize PRISONS DEPARTMENT 1.9 The inmates at the Belize Central Prison - under the management of the Kolbe Foundation - complained to the Ombudsman about the following: 1. Trial and Sentencing Errors 2. Appeals and Delays 3. Non-existent, incompetent or neglectful Legal Representation 4. Need for Medical and Surgical treatment Complaint A Central American immigrant was convicted in the 1990’s and sentenced to death for a murder he says he did not commit. He alleges he was not assigned Legal Representation and does not speak or understand English. The interpreter assigned to his trial allegedly did not do a good or reliable job. Although his death sentence was later commuted to life imprisonment, he believes he has suffered grave injustice. 1.10 Since most of the complaints against Prisons Department pertains to trials, sentencing, appeals and legal representation and fall within the category “commencement or conduct of criminal or civil proceedings”, the Ombudsman’s intervention is excluded in most instances. Nonetheless, the Ombudsman in the spirit of public service sought to assist by referring the complaints to the appropriate or competent body – for instance, the Honourable Kenneth Benjamin, Chief Justice of the Page | 10 2014 ANNUAL REPORT Supreme Court and Chairperson of the Judicial and Legal Services Commission, for assignment of legal counsel in capital cases; the Legal Aid Centre; private legal practitioners; the Attorney General’s Ministry; and other competent bodies. Complaint In 2014, two Guatemalan inmates asked the Ombudsman for help in getting them transferred to Guatemala to serve the remainder of their sentences there, near families and friends. The Ombudsman contacted the Attorney General’s Ministry, who undertook to facilitate their transfer under the Inter-American Convention on Service Criminal Sentences Abroad, provided all the legal requirements are satisfied. Lands and Surveys Department 1.11 Complainants accused the Lands & Survey Department, Ministry of Natural Resources, of the following wrongdoings (i) Corruption (ii) Unlawful compulsory acquisition of private lands (iii) Unwillingness to resolve title disputes Complaint 985 Two complainants residing in California, U.S.A., purchased property on San Pedro Ambergris Caye. The Government of Belize later declared the land a compulsory registration area, requiring the applicants to apply for First Registration under the Registered Lands Act. The complainants were not notified in time and applied at a The Ombudsman of Belize later date. The land was “assumed” to be owned by the Government of Belize and was sold by/to public officials who then sold it to a Real Estate Agent for listing. The parcel was the subject matter of ongoing litigation, and the Ombudsman has been informed that a decision was recently rendered. 1.12 Regarding the lease of national estates, complainants alleged the following: (i) National estates being sold to public servants or government workers for re-sale at a profit on the open market (ii) Inexcusable delays in processing lease applications (iii) Lost files (iv) Procedural improprieties: “first come not first served”, or applications were granted even though all the requirements had not been met (v) Resulting economic or financial loss to the applicants Judiciary 1.13 Complainants alleged various wrongdoings by the Courts that make up the Judiciary. These included the administrative staff. The subject matters of these complaints include the following: Page | 11 2014 ANNUAL REPORT Family and Magistrate’s Courts The Ombudsman of Belize Court of Appeal (i) Delays in filing or hearing appeal (i) Discourtesy or abuse (ii) Bias (iii)Errors in court proceedings or sentencing (iv)Delays in collecting maintenance payments (v) Delays in enforcing court orders (vi)Inadequate or lost case files Complaint 900 A man from San Ignacio Town, Cayo District, filed in the Magistrate’s Court a civil suit involving a motor vehicle. The Magistrate allegedly threatened him if he did not withdraw the civil suit. She also called him in chambers and verbally insulted him. He later found out that the Respondent was the Magistrate’s spouse/companion. The Magistrate had refused to recuse herself from the lawsuit, even though she had direct personal and financial interest in the outcome of the lawsuit and was biased. The complaint was referred to the Honourable Chief Justice. Supreme Court and Vital Statistics Unit (i) Errors at Trial (ii) Delays with Appeals (iii)Inadequate or inaccurate Records Keeping (ii) Delays in handing down judgments 1.14 Most of the complaints involving the judiciary were referred to the Legal Aid Centre and/or private Attorneys-at-Law for legal advice and representation. Except for complaints against administrative functions, most concerned the commencement or conduct of court proceedings; an adjudicated remedy; or matters within the purview of the Judicial and Legal Services Commission. As a result, the Ombudsman could not intervene in these matters.1 Human Services Department 1.15 Much of the complaints against the Human Services Department involved child custody issues. Parents complained that the Department took custody of their children without a court order or a proper and comprehensive Social Enquiry Report. Most of the children were victims of sexual abuse. Complaint 882 A mother complained to the Ombudsman that the Department of Human Services took her teenage daughter from her custody when authorities found out she was pregnant. The putative father has had many run-ins with the law. The Department put the teen 1 See Section 12(3) (a), (b); Third Schedule, Para. 1 Page | 12 2014 ANNUAL REPORT in the care of the child’s grandmother, allegedly without conducting a proper social enquiry report. The Ombudsman of Belize 1.18 The remaining complaints against other authorities involved: (i) Impropriety in Foreclosures or exercise of the Mortgagee’s Powers Other Authorities (ii)Loss of commercial lease or licence and resulting financial loss 1.16 Many of the complaints against authorities such as the Public Service and Teaching Services Commissions pertained to the employment relationship. These include: (i) Employment Discrimination, particularly, in promotion decisions (ii) Employment-related Injuries (iii) Harassment (iv) Wrongful or Unfair Dismissal (v) Disciplinary Proceedings and Reinstatement (vi) Salaries, including unlawful withholding or forfeiture (vii) Pensions, including teachers pensions and pensions for widows and orphans. Note: Employment-related complaints were not limited to these two authorities 1.17 Unfortunately, the Act precludes the Ombudsman from investigating any decisions regarding the employment, promotion or termination by the Public or Teaching Services Commission.2 2 (iii) Failure or refusal to monitor Social Security Board contributions by Employers See Section 12 (4) (a); Third Schedule, Para. 4 (iv) Slander, Mobile Health Unit Please see Appendix 1 for additional statistics. INFORMAL COMPLAINTS 1.19 From time to time the Ombudsman receives complaints against private individuals or requests for legal assistance with a transaction or litigation. These have been traditionally referred to as “Informal Complaints” because the Ombudsman is prohibited from investigating them.3 Nonetheless, the Ombudsman, in the spirit of public service, tries to assist where possible and to the extent permissible, without exceeding his statutory jurisdiction. 3 Section 12(1) read along with Section 2 (1) Page | 13 2014 ANNUAL REPORT The following are two instances in which the Office assisted informal complainants. Complaint A woman visited the Office, complaining that she bought a box of cereal from a Supermarket, which contained worms. Her son unwittingly ate the cereal only to realize that it was spoiled. He became ill. The woman was encouraged to: i. Keep her sales receipt, the box of cereal with bar code and spoiled cereal, and any medical records; ii. Write a demand letter and notice of intent to sue to the Supermarket and its owner; and, iii. Retain the services of an Attorneyat-Law in order to file a claim in civil (magistrate’s court within six months from the date of the incident. Complaint A widow and her adult son wanted to sell one of the deceased husband’s real estate. They needed title to the property, but could not afford the services of an attorney-at-law to facilitate this transaction. The Office of the Ombudsman: i. Prepared an application for Transmission of Title to her as Personal Representative; ii. Instructed her to have the copies properly executed before a Justice of the Peace; and, iii. Told her to take the completed application along with payment for the appropriate fees to the Lands & Survey Department in Belmopan. The Ombudsman of Belize STATUS OF COMPLAINTS 1.20 Of the 220 complaints received in 2014, approximately two hundred and sixteen (216) were referred, refused or terminated or are being investigated or considered for investigation. The remaining four (4) complaints are (informal) complaints. 1.21 Of the 216 complaints, a little less than half, forty per centum (40%), are the subject of preliminary enquiries. The purpose of preliminary enquiries is to determine whether or not reasonable cause exists to believe that the authority complained of has committed the wrongdoing alleged. The Ombudsman makes preliminary enquires where necessary and without notice to authorities to satisfy himself that the complainants’ allegations are more likely than not true. Although the initial burden of proof is on the complainant, too often complainants do not bring any evidence to support their allegations. 1.22 About a quarter (25%) of the complaints were refused, terminated or referred without investigation. If it is apparent that no reasonable cause exists, or that reasonable cause exists but the Ombudsman jurisdiction to investigate is ousted, the complaint is refused, terminated, and/or referred to a competent entity. Page | 14 2014 ANNUAL REPORT 1.23 Almost a quarter (24%) of complaints resulted in Notices being given to the authorities complained against. Once reasonable cause has been established, and the Ombudsman’s jurisdiction is not excluded, the Ombudsman sends a Notice to the authorities complained against summarizing the allegations made; indicating intent to investigate; and, inviting comments regarding the allegations before investigation commences. 1.24 A little less than one-tenth (9%) of authorities have provided Comments in response to allegations. Although this is a small percentage of the total number of complaints received, the percentage is much higher (about 40%) when compared to the number of complaints for which Notices have been given. The Police Department and the Lands & Survey Department are to be commended for their responsiveness in providing comments to notices. The Ombudsman of Belize Figure 3. Status of Complaints 1% 9% Referred, Refused 1% Preliminary Enquiries 24% 25% Notice of Investigation Comments Received 40% Ongoing Investigation Completed Closed 1.25 A small percentage (1%) of the complaints with comments received is the subject of ongoing investigations. Likewise, about 1% of complaints have been fully investigated, findings and recommendations made, and are (to be) considered close. Please see Figure 3 below for a graphic depiction of the status of complaints. Page | 15 2014 ANNUAL REPORT II. SPECIAL REPORT 2.0 The Ombudsman may at any time submit a report relating to any particular case or cases investigated by him which in his opinion requires the special attention of the National Assembly.4 The following report is being submitted for the special attention of the National Assembly. 2.1 The identities are concealed because the complaints are privileged. The personal information of the complainants and others will be provided upon request and as necessary or appropriate. Complaint No. 939/2014, “Mr. M.” Facts Mr. M, through various agents and himself, applied for minutes of disciplinary proceedings held by the Belize Teaching Services Commission (BTSC) in 2011; the BTSC reviewed the decision of a governmentfunded High School to terminate his teaching employment on allegations of sexual harassment. He did not receive a written reply, and applied to the Minister of Education, Youth and Sports for an internal review. The Minister did not reply. Mr. M. applied to the Ombudsman for a review of the refusal to grant him access to the minutes pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act, Chapter 13, Laws of Belize, (Rev. Ed. 2000) (FOIA). The Ombudsman sent notice of Mr. M’s application and complaint to the BTSC, the Chief Executive Officer, and the Minister of Education pursuant to the FOIA and the The Ombudsman of Belize Ombudsman Act. He then summoned the Chairperson of the BTSC to provide evidence and the opportunity to inspect the minutes requested. After being granted an extension of time to appear, the Chairperson eventually refused to appear before the Ombudsman based on the advice of the Solicitor General, Attorney General’s Ministry. Law The Education (Amendment) Rules, Chapter 36, Subsidiary Laws of Belize (Rev. Ed. 2010) provides detailed rules governing the discipline and termination of teachers, among other things. They state that a teacher may be terminated for a major offence, and define a major offense as including criminal conduct or conduct which is physically or morally harmful to students or other members of staff including sexual harassment. 5 The definition of sexual harassment is not provided in the rules but is to be found in the Protection from Sexual Harassment Act, Chapter 107, Laws of Belize (Rev. Ed. 2000)(PSHA). The PSHA states that sexual harassment must contain two ingredients6: One, an unwelcome sexual advance, request for sexual favours or unwelcome sexual conduct; and, two, the person suffers a disadvantage in connection with his employment or the unwelcome conduct unreasonably interferes with his work performance or creates an intimidating, hostile or offensive environment. There was an unwelcome request for sexual favour. Mr. M. admitted (albeit before the District Education Council) that he asked a female intern if they could be “friends with benefits”, which is a colloquial expression used to mean a relationship of a sexual nature. However, Rule 92A (3)(b)(vii) See Section 3 (4) (a) – (b), Protection from Sexual Harassment Act 5 6 4 Section 28 (2), Ombudsman Act. See also S. 22(1) Page | 16 2014 ANNUAL REPORT no evidence was given to establish that the complainant suffered any disadvantage in connection with her employment or that the unwelcome conduct unreasonably interfered with her work performance or created an intimidating, hostile or offensive environment. She completed her internship as scheduled one month after Mr. M was dismissed. Furthermore, a letter was written by Mr. M’s spiritual advisor, stating that Mr. M was repentant of his conduct. If the misconduct did not amount to sexual harassment, Mr. M’s conduct should have been treated - at least on the first occasion as a minor offense. The proceedings for minor offenses under the Education (Amendment) Rules differ from proceedings for major or criminal offenses. Accused of a minor offense, Mr. M. should have been given a caution or a (first or final) written reprimand which should have been placed on his record while he remained employed with a 100% of his salary being paid to him. If the conduct was repeated then he could have been given either a final written reprimand or termination as appropriate in the circumstances, as if he had committed a major or criminal offense. 7 However, the statutory procedure was disregarded by the High School’s Board of Management. Mr. M was not cautioned, given a written or a final written reprimand. The Board immediately terminated his employment effective November 1, 2011. The Education Rules have been established to protect teachers from unfair dismissal. There is a certain procedure to be followed when considering the termination of a teacher’s employment. However, Mr. M. was deprived of this statutory procedural The Ombudsman of Belize safeguard. The decision to terminate Mr. M. for sexual harassment was not justified procedurally, or on the merits, and is considered unlawful. Note that even under the PSHA, where sexual harassment is proven, the Court has power to order the guilty party from repeating sexual harassment conduct, to pay damages or compensation to the victim, or to be bound to good behaviour.8 The BTSC could have followed the example provided to the Court by statute. These procedural safeguards against “termination at will” were disregarded not only by the School’s Board of Management but also by the Teaching Services Commission. Furthermore, the Commission and the Tribunal breached some of the basic rules of natural justice. The Commission had a duty to give Mr. M their decision in writing and to inform him of his right to appeal to the Teaching Services Commission Appeal Tribunal within thirty (30) days and the procedure for doing so. The Commission did not give any decision in writing or inform him of his right to appeal. Mr. M made his appeal to the District Education Council, which is not responsible for disciplinary matters but for policy and planning. Nonetheless, the Council investigated and upheld the Commission’s decision. Eventually, Mr. M appealed to the Teaching Services Commission Tribunal. The Tribunal and the BTSC are considered judicial bodies when conducting disciplinary proceedings. As such, they must exercise their powers within the legal and procedural rules of natural justice.9 They ought not only to 8 See Section 16 (2) (a) – (h), Protection from Sexual Harassment Act 9 7 See Rule 93 (1), Education (Amendment) Rules See Bernice Freeman v. Attorney General of British Virgin Island, Claim No. BVIHCV 2008/0383, Judgment 2012 at p. 27. Page | 17 2014 ANNUAL REPORT ensure a fair hearing within a reasonable time but also have a duty to give decisions in writing with reasons stated therein. This duty to give reasons is indispensable because it shows whether a decision is so unreasonable as to be considered fundamentally bad, therefore warranting the Court’s intervention in the exercise of its inherent supervisory jurisdiction. It is well known that the three grounds for review of administrative action are: illegality, procedural impropriety, and irrationality. 10 In Mr. M’s case, the first two “grounds of illegality and procedural impropriety exist. Without a written decision, it is impossible to say if the third ground of irrationality exists. Please note that to date, neither the BTSC nor the Tribunal has informed Mr. M in writing of their decision and the reasons for it. Consequently, although it is possible that all three grounds for judicial review exist, Mr. M has been unable to exercise his right to apply to the Supreme Court for review. In January 2014, Mr. M obtained a full teaching license. A license is to be granted if a Person, among other things, demonstrates “personal and behavioural qualities to be a positive role model to students” and...” demonstrates a sense of right and wrong, the practice of moral conduct, a commitment to truth and honesty, and respect for spiritual values”.11 These two contradictory decisions indicate the degree of irrationality proscribed by the rules of natural justice. The Ombudsman of Belize Conclusion & Recommendations The Ombudsman concludes that the termination of Mr. M was unlawful in that it was not supported by the merits of the case and the statutory procedures and rules of natural justice were not complied with. Mr. M did not commit a major offense and he was deprived of his protection against unfair dismissal and his right to apply for judicial review. For these reasons, and the subsequent conduct of the authorities, this complaint warrants special attention and has been made the subject of this report. The Ombudsman recommends that Mr. M. be given 100% of his salary from the time his termination took effect, November 1, 2011, to when he first obtained alternative employment, with all lawful and authorized deductions to be made. Since Mr. M. is now employed as a full time teacher in Belize City, Belize, no reinstatement is recommended. Alternatively, the Ombudsman recommends that the Teaching Services Appeal Tribunal writes Mr. M within thirty (30) days from the date hereof of their decision with reasons stated therein. 10 See Council for Civil Service Unions v. Minister for the Civil Service, (1983) UKHL 6, at p. 16, for three grounds of judicial review: 11 See Rules 57 and 58, Education (Amendment) Rules Page | 18 2014 ANNUAL REPORT III. RESOLUTION COMPLAINTS The Ombudsman of Belize OF 3.0 It is my pleasure to report that in 2014 several complaints were resolved in a manner mutually satisfactory to the complainants and the authorities. Although the Ombudsman does not take the lion’s share of the credit, these developments indicate that the Ombudsman has been effective in helping citizens to obtain justice, or restitution, for injustice and injury they have suffered at the hands of public authorities. Given the small staff and limited budget, in comparison to the number of complaints, the Office has managed to positively impact the lives of some and to shift the balance of power if only a little in favour of the citizenry. Thus, we are pleased to highlight the following developments in 2014: Complaint No. 973/2014 An elderly widow applied to have her deceased husband’s Government lease transferred to her as Personal Representative. She obtained Grant of Letters of Administration, completed and submitted all the necessary paperwork, contacted the District Lands Inspector for a Site Inspection Report, and paid rent on time. After three years of being turned around, with all kinds of excuses proffered, her lease expired. She was about to lose over $35,000.00 invested in her home and cash crops as a result of the Department’s wrongdoings. The Ombudsman contacted the Lands & Survey Department regarding her complaint, and also encouraged the widow to seek legal advice and representation. The widow’s lease was renewed. She now wants to purchase the land and avoid being in the position she was prior to the new lease. Complaint No. 844/2013 An elderly man complained against the Belize Electricity Limited (BEL) for failing to compensate him for a significant acreage of his cultivated land BEL “used” to install poles and transmission lines in 1998. B.E.L. is owned (51%) by the Government of Belize and is considered an authority under the Ombudsman Act. The man filed a lawsuit within the statutory limitation but court proceedings were stayed in 2003 so the matter could be arbitrated pursuant to provisions of the Electricity Act. The matter has not yet been arbitrated. The Ombudsman searched the Court file, and contacted the different parties. It was revealed that BEL had made an offer to settle the claim in the sum of $257,785.53 but the complainant’s Attorney never informed him. The Ombudsman wrote the complainant informing him of this offer and strongly encouraging him to retain legal representative for settlement of his claim. This complaint is considered a more egregious example of the violation of a citizen’s constitutional right by a public authority, namely, the right to protection from unlawful compulsory acquisition of property. Page | 19 2014 ANNUAL REPORT Complaint No. 835/2013 An employee of the Prisons Department dislocated his shoulder during an on-the-job training course. He went on medical leave for a couple of months, and returned to work after being certified fit to work on condition that he avoids heavy lifting and strenuous activities. His employment was immediately terminated without any compensation for his injury or lost wages. He complained to the Labour Department and the Ombudsman. The Ombudsman contacted all parties concerned, including the Labour Department, and also encouraged the complainant to seek legal advice and representation for an intended lawsuit. The complainant was subsequently awarded an out of court settlement in the sum of $9,522.00 in exchange for releasing the Prisons Department and the Kolbe Foundation from all liabilities, claims and actions pertaining to the incident. Complaint No. 640/2012 A teacher was denied a teaching license, which is mandatory for employment, because he was found to have been convicted of a felony indicating unsuitability for the teaching profession. He had two convictions for possession of controlled drugs years earlier. It was determined that these convictions were misdemeanours and not felony. Consequently, the Teaching Services Commission and the Chief Education Officer should not have denied him his teaching license or terminated his employment on this basis. The Ombudsman intervened, and in his Thirteenth Annual Report included a Special Report to the National Assembly requesting his reinstatement and payment of salaries owed. As a result, the The Ombudsman of Belize Ministry of Education earmarked $19,264.00 to be paid to the complainant for salary wrongfully withheld during an eight (8) months period. Complaint No. 547/2012 In 2003, the Ministry of Natural Resources leased a parcel of land in the St. Martin De Porres Area, Belize City, to the complainant. A month later the Ministry wrote him asking him to cease and desist from filling the land because it belonged to someone else. In 2005 the complainant was given permission to purchase the same parcel. A couple years later he was told that the land was not his. He complained to the Minister and other representatives from the Lands Department who promised him compensation for the landfill and different parcel of land. He was given a different parcel, but was not compensated for the landfill. With the intervention of the Ombudsman, the complainant received $12,000.00 as final settlement for unjust enrichment. Complaint No. 137/2012 A Belize City woman received $1,090.00 from the Government of Belize as compensation for personal property mishandled by members of the Police Department. The property consisted mostly of personal jewellery that had been stolen but recovered. The items were used as exhibits during a criminal trial. Instead of returning the items to the complainant at the conclusion of the trial, as ordered by the Magistrate, the Police Department auctioned the items. The complainant was compensated for her loss occasioned by the conversion of her property by the Department. Page | 20 2014 ANNUAL REPORT IV. FREEDOM INFORMATION ACT The Ombudsman of Belize OF 4.0 The Freedom of Information Act, Chapter 13, Substantive Laws of Belize (Rev. Ed 2000), is intended to improve transparency in public administration. It requires public bodies12 to give the public access to documents such as manuals, rules, procedures, guidelines, public registers, documents available for purchase, fees and charges payable and the like. Access is limited to documents that are not exempt. A sufficiently detailed written request is made13 and the authority promptly makes a decision to grant/deny access. If access is denied, the authority must notify in writing the requesting party and give reasons. If still dissatisfied, the requesting party can apply to the Ombudsman under Part V of the Act for a review of the decision.14 4.1 In April 2014, the Ombudsman received the first application for review of a decision pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act. The applicant, a non-profit organization, applied to the Auditor General for access to all information obtained from an on-going investigation of the Immigration and Nationality Department. The Auditor General denied this request for access because the Audit Report first had to be submitted to the Honourable Minister of Finance, the Rt. Hon. Dean O. Barrow, for presentation to Cabinet and then to the National Assembly after which it can be considered a public document. The applicant applied to the Ombudsman for a review of the Auditor General’s decision. The Ombudsman reviewed the evidence and upheld the Auditor General’s decision. 4.2 In May 2014, a dissatisfied taxi driver applied to the Honourable Mayor of the Belmopan City Council and the Chief Executive Officer, Department of Transport, for the following information pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act15: An official list of all taxis or taxi owners/operators for the years 2012 to 2014 who are approved to operate from the Belmopan City Market Square and the Belmopan City Bus Terminal The criteria used for selecting the approved taxis or taxi owners/operators Application procedures for selection Regulations and/or Minutes of Proceedings of the Belize City Council, Transport Advisory Council and/or Transport Department pertaining to selection No one replied. The complainant did not apply to the (responsible) Ministers of Government for an internal review. Since no reply had been received, the complainant could 12 See Section 3 (1), Freedom of Information Act See Sections 7(1) (a)-(b), 9, and 12(1), (2) 14 Section 35 (1) 13 15 Section 9, Freedom of Information Act Page | 21 2014 ANNUAL REPORT The Ombudsman of Belize not apply to the Ombudsman for a review of the decision. The Ombudsman treated the matter as a complaint and decided to investigate pursuant to the Ombudsman Act. After receiving notice of the Ombudsman’s intent to investigate, the Honourable Mayor Mr. Simeon Lopez was kind enough to comment and offered the complainant the opportunity to dialogue and a new location for operation of his taxi services. 4.3 A third application was made to the Ombudsman pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act. Since this application was also treated as a complaint pursuant to the Ombudsman Act and has been dealt with above as a Special Report, it has not been included in this section. 4.4 Subsequent to these Applications, the Ombudsman has received no new applications under the Freedom of Information Act. Also, please note that only the first application above-mentioned has not been counted in the statistics relating to complaints made pursuant to the Ombudsman Act. Page | 22 2014 ANNUAL REPORT V. INSTITUTIONAL COLLABORATION Police Department 5.0 In April 2014, the Ombudsman presented the Commissioner of Police with a list of 499 complaints made against the Police Department during the years 2009 to 2014, and asked for updates. Within one month, the Department responded and provided this Office with updates on 42 complaints. The Department and the Ombudsman have also been meeting on a monthly basis to review progress in handling of complaints for the years 2012 to 2014 as well as new complaints. The Ombudsman also collaborated with the Police Department in matters of training, mentioned below. Both parties have indicated a willingness to formalize this relationship, through proper channels. Prisons Department 5.1 The employees of the Prisons Department and its managing agency, the Kolbe foundation, made themselves very accessible to the Ombudsman and his staff. In 2014, the Ombudsman and his staff toured the Belize Central Prison and met with prisoners and staff of the Prisons Department and Kolbe Foundation on many occasions. The prisoners made complaints, which have been dealt with in preceding sections. The Ombudsman and his staff also made their own observations. These The Ombudsman of Belize include: Poor sanitation or hygiene in prison cells Overcrowding of prison cells Medical condition of some prisoners, especially the elderly and females 5.2 Despite the seriousness of the situation, observable progress had been made in 2014 to improve the quality of life for inmates. These include the following: A full-time medical doctor (general practitioner) is now on site. Karl Heusner Memorial Hospital continues to provide necessary medical and surgical treatment to inmates, and to defray most of the costs associated with such treatment. Consultant Joseph Middleton prepared and published his finding and recommendations for improvements to the prison system, in the report abovementioned. Criminal Justice Reform Board 5.3 In 2014, the Ombudsman and his staff met with Ms. Sarah Fearnley, Criminal Justice Adviser. Ms Fearnley works with the Criminal Justice Reform project funded by the United States of America Department of Justice and the United Kingdom’s Crown Prosecution Services. Page | 23 2014 ANNUAL REPORT The Ombudsman of Belize 5.4 She invited the Ombudsman to be represented on the Criminal Justice Reform Board. As of July 2014, the Ombudsman, or his representative, has been attending monthly Board meetings. The meetings are held at the Supreme Court Building and are chaired by the Honourable Kenneth Benjamin, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Belize. The Board’s goal is legislative reform in the following areas: Criminal Procedure Rules Police Rules on Caution Statements Protection of Witnesses during Investigation and Trial Electronic Recording of Interviews Video Links in Proceedings 5.5 The legislation and rules have been drafted primarily by Ms. Fearnley, with the input of all the relevant institutions and persons, and are near finalization. It is anticipated that they will become law in the first quarter of 2015. Miss Sarah Fearnley, Criminal Justice Adviser (C) Ministry of Human Development 5.6 In 2011, the Ombudsman along with the Women’s Department, Human Services Department, Director of Health Services and Police Commissioner worked together to establish the Protocols for Multi-Sectorial Response to Sexual Violence. Since then, the collaboration between the Ministry of Human Development, especially the Women’s and Human Services Departments, and the Ombudsman has continued. United Nations Trust Fund Project on Gender-Based Violence 5.7 In April 2014, the Office of the Ombudsman contributed to the formulation of the Terms of Reference for a consultant who will conduct an investigation into issues raised in the report “Strengthening State Accountability in the Policing and Prosecuting of Sexual Offenses”, Page | 24 2014 ANNUAL REPORT prepared by (then) Attorney-at-Law Antoinette Moore in 2009. 5.8 In May 2014, the Ombudsman and his Staff had the pleasure of welcoming from the United Nations Trust Fund Mission team Claudia Briones, Women’s Programme Specialist, and Gabrielle Henderson, United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and Empowerment of Women. 5.9 In August 2014, the Ombudsman and his staff participated in a video as part of a public education campaign on the use of the Ombudsman’s Office for complaints on the Government’s response to incidence of genderbased violence. This video was produced by 13 Productions and aired for three consecutive weeks during the months of October and November 2014 on Love FM, Krem and Plus TV in Belmopan. The video was aired during the evening news to reach a larger audience. 5.10 The Ombudsman is also a member of the National Genderbased Violence Committee, which deals with activities sponsored under the United Nations Trust Fund as well as the Central American Integration System (SICA), particularly, the BA1 Project. BA1 Project 5.11 The project BA1 Prevention of Violence against Women in Central America seeks to contribute to the reduction of violence against female The Ombudsman of Belize trafficking and femicide through interventions on the factors that contribute to it and on improving first response. It is endorsed by the Central American Integration System (SICA’S) Heads of Government and supported by the United Nations Fund for Population Activities (UNFPA) and the International Organization for Migration (IOM). The project will be implemented in six (6) cluster communities throughout Belize which were carefully selected. The Ombudsman sits on the National Gender Base Violence Committee (NGBVC) and has been participating in meetings since June 2014. ATIPS Council 5.12 The Ombudsman also collaborated with the Anti-Trafficking in Persons Council (ATIPS) pertaining to the BA1 project, mentioned above and to facilitate training in relevant legislation under the Access to Justice Program. The training is detailed below. University of Michigan 5.13 The arrangement with the University of Michigan continued in 2014. Four students from the University of Michigan worked as interns for the Office of the Ombudsman. The group was asked to prepare legal opinions on two difficult complaints. GeDa Jones and Britney Littles dealt with Complaint No. 642, which involved unwarrantable use of force by the Police Department. Zhandos Kuderin Page | 25 2014 ANNUAL REPORT The Ombudsman of Belize and Julie Kornfeld dealt with Complaint No. 713, which involved allegations of medical and professional negligence and misconduct. They advised the Ombudsman as to the legal courses of action available in respect of each. Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labour Mr. Robert Gibson, INL Coordinator, U.S. Embassy, Belize His Excellency Peter Hughes, British High Commissioner to Belize Her Excellency Ms. Paola Amadei, European Union Ambassador to Belize His Excellency, Yoel Perez Marcano, Ambassador ofVenezuela to Belize Red Cross Society 5.14 In 2014, the Office of the Ombudsman collaborated with the Belize Red Cross Society in training home health care workers, as mentioned below. Meetings 5.16 At these meetings, the Ombudsman promoted his Agenda for his term of Office. This Agenda consists of the following priorities: 5.15 During 2014, the Ombudsman and his staff had the honour and privilege of meeting with various foreign and local dignitaries. Highlights were meetings with the following: His Excellency Sir Colville Young, Governor General of Belize Honourable Kenneth Benjamin, Chief Justice of Belize Honourable Gaspar Vega, Chairman, Ombudsman Reports Committee Honourable Pablo Marin, Minister of Health Honourable Patrick Faber, Minister of Education, Youth and Sports Her Excellency, Margaret Hawthorne, former Chargé d’Affaires for Belize, United States Embassy Mr. Cory Andrews, Foreign Service Officer, U.S. State Department’s Public Education Campaigns Constitutional and Legislative Changes to the Ombudsman Act. Resource Mobilization for the Office of the Ombudsman Establishing Strategic Partnerships, especially in the area of Human Rights Protection VI. TRAINING CONFERENCES AND 6.0 In March 2014, the Ombudsman met with the Toledo staff of the Education Department and visited four primary schools, namely, San Felipe, Santa Ana, Page | 26 2014 ANNUAL REPORT Midway, and Barranco Roman Catholic and Government Schools. The Ombudsman made presentations to the faculty, staff and students on “The Role of the Ombudsman”. 6.1 On April 8, 2014, at the request of the Belize Red Cross Society, Legal Officer Ms. Rubiceli Perera prepared and delivered a one-hour training presentation to home health care workers on the Law and Patient Abuse. The training took place at Belize’s ITVET (Institute for Technical and Vocational Education and Training) on Freetown Road, Belize City, Belize. The training focused on: Liability of Health Care workers under the Criminal Code, Chapter 101, Laws of Belize, Rev. Ed. 2000 Liability of Health Care workers under Civil (Torts) Law dealing with Trespass to Person, Medical Negligence Screening for Patients Abused by “Third Parties” (i.e. not health care workers) 6.2 From April 22 to 25, 2014, the Ombudsman and his Legal Officer attended a training seminar on the Legal Aspects of Combating Corruption, which was sponsored and facilitated by the United States’ Defense Institute of International Legal Studies (DIILS) and convened at Price Barracks, Ladyville, Belize. From May 19 to 23, 2014, the Ombudsman and the Records and Research Officer, Mr. Clarence Slusher, attended a similar seminar on The Ombudsman of Belize the Legal Aspects of Land and Maritime Border Security, also sponsored by DIILS. 6.3 In July 2014, the Ombudsman attended the Prison Reform Roundtable Discussion which was hosted by the Belize Bar Association and sponsored by the United Kingdom’s Death Penalty Review Project. The Discussion centered on the findings of Joseph Middleton, Consultant, concerning the prisons system in relation to juvenile justice; long-term prisoners; the mentally ill; and, other groups. Mr. Middleton published his findings in a report called “Behind the Prison Gates: Findings and Recommendation from a visit by Joseph Middleton to the Belize Central Prisons” (2014). 6.4 On July 8, 2014, the Ombudsman and Mr. Slusher did a presentation to the Police Recruits at the Police Training Academy in Belmopan City, Cayo District on the “Role of the Ombudsman.” 6.5 From August 11 to 15, 2014, the Ombudsman and his Records and Research Officer attended the Mediation and Negotiation Training for National Human Rights Institute in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. The training was sponsored by the Commonwealth Secretariat in partnership with the South African based ACCORD (African Centre for Constructive Resolution of Disputes). Page | 27 2014 ANNUAL REPORT The Ombudsman of Belize Trafficking in Persons (Prohibition) Act, Act No. 2 of 2013 Commercial Sexual Exploitation of Children (Prohibition) Act, No. 3 of 2013 Criminal Code (Draft) Amendments, Ch. 101, Laws of Belize Mediation and Negotiation Training, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia 6.6 On October 22, 2014, the Ombudsman and Mr. Slusher did a presentation on the “Role of the Ombudsman” to the faculty, staff and students of St. Ignatius High School, Evening Division, Santa Elena, Cayo District. 6.7 In October and November 2014, Miss Perera helped to facilitate training presentations as part of the Children’s Access to Justice Program sponsored by the ATIPS (AntiTrafficking in Persons Council), the Ministry of Human Development, and the National Committee for Families and Children (NCFC). The training targeted “front-line” workers from the Police Department, Immigration and Nationality Department, Human Services Department, Health Care workers, and others in all six districts. Miss Perera facilitated the sessions for Toledo and Stann Creek only. The presentations focused on the following legislation: 6.8 In November 2014, Ms. Perera, the Ombudsman and Mr. Slusher prepared and delivered a one-hour training presentation to Police Officers on Case Management and Negotiation. The training focused on the importance of case management in police investigation, in light of the backlog of criminal cases and the (draft) Criminal Procedure Rules which will soon become law. It also focused on the importance of negotiating plea bargains to help dispose of criminal cases. The training was sponsored by the Belize Police Department, Belize Defense Force and the International Committee for the Red Cross. The training took place at the Police Training Academy, Belmopan City, Cayo District. 6.9 In June and December 2014, the Office of the Ombudsman hosted interns Miss Tamara Hemsley and Miss Josephine Flores. These two young ladies are senior high school students from Edward P. Yorke High School and Gwen Lizarraga High School, respectively. The young ladies learned about office procedures, use of office equipment, dress code, punctuality, personal relations and other workplace skills. Page | 28 2014 ANNUAL REPORT Meetings The Ombudsman of Belize Mediation and Negotiation Training, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Mr. Cory Andrews, U.S. Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labour (2R) Mr. Andrews & Officers of the U.S. Embassy to Belize Her Excellency, Ms. Paola Amadei, European Union’s Ambassador to Belize (C) Ombudsman (L), Mr. Slusher (R) Claudia Briones (L), Gabrielle Henderson (R), U.N. Trust Fund Mission Team Page | 29 2014 ANNUAL REPORT Access to Justice Training, Belize The Ombudsman of Belize Tour of Primary Schools In The Toledo District, Belize Group Work Group Presentation Conclusion of Training Session in Punta Gorda Town, Toledo District Page | 30 2014 ANNUAL REPORT VII. ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS 7.0 In 2014, the Office of the Ombudsman carried out its mandate, an enormous responsibility given the number of complaints and the human and financial constraints. Nonetheless, as in previous years, the Ombudsman and his employees overcame these challenges and constraints and discharged their responsibilities with much professionalism and hard work. 7.1 The year 2014 brought some personnel changes to the Office. In the early part of 2014, the Office of the Ombudsman welcomed three new employees: Ms. Rubiceli Perera, Legal Officer Mr. Lyndon Mai, Security Officer Ms. Kimberlyn Marin, Office Cleaner Miss Perera replaces the outgoing Legal Officer, Mr. Oscar Selgado, who opted not to renew his contract in order to pursue a career as a private law practitioner. Miss Perera’s qualifications include a Bachelor of Laws degree from the University of the West Indies, Cave Hill, Barbados, and a Certificate of Legal Education from the Norman Manley Law School, Mona, Jamaica. She also has some experience in private practice as an Associate with the established firm of W.H. Courtenay & Co. The The Ombudsman of Belize Ombudsman wishes Mr. Selgado much success in his new undertaking. Ms. Rubiceli Perera, Legal Officer, and the Ombudsman, after Oath Ceremony Mr. Lyndon Mai is a retired Sergeant of the Belize Defense Force. During his twenty-two years as a soldier, Mr. Mai served with diligence and loyalty. He also took courses in counter narcotics, crime scenes, combat medicine, infantry tactics and international legal studies. Ms. Kimberlyn Marin is a graduate of Gwen Lizaragga High School. She once worked as a domestic/labourer at local business places in Belize City, Belize. Ms. Marin replaces Ms. Gilda Leslie, who retired in 2014. Page | 31 2014 ANNUAL REPORT Thank you Ms. Gilda Leslie, for years of dedicated service to the Ombudsman’s Office! 7.2 In August 2014, the Office of the Ombudsman designed a new logo for use on all documents and materials. The design was initiated as a result of the collaboration between the Office of the Ombudsman and the Women’s Department, Ministry of Human Development, Social Transformation and Poverty Alleviation. A logo was required for a joint public education campaign, including a video “infomercial” on the role of the Ombudsman in assessing the Government’s response to reports of gender-based violence. 7.3 The Logo consists of scales of justice with speech captions, the map of Belize, a dove with an Olive branch, the words Ombudsman of Belize and the motto “Don’t Suffer in Silence”; the colours are black, white and gold. The logo, in its entirety, is shown below: The Ombudsman of Belize Don’t Suffer in Silence! The logo’s graphics depict the work of the Ombudsman, listening to complainants and investigating complaints, as well as the principles with which he executes his functions within the entire territory of Belize. These principles are: Rule of law Peace Fairness & Impartiality Confidentiality Freedom of expression Expeditiousness 7.4 In September 2014, notice of the new Logo was published in the Government Gazette. The logo was used on the infomercial on genderbased violence and is now routinely used on correspondence; the new website, www.ombudsmanbelize.com; brochures; and other materials. 7.5 The Ombudsman also took initial steps towards establishing office procedures and making a Complaints Register available to the public. Page | 32 2014 ANNUAL REPORT 7.6 As 2014 has ended, this opportunity is taken to recognize and express appreciation to the following Ombudsman’s staff for their professionalism and diligence during the past year: LEGAL OFFICER Ms. Rubiceli Perera RECORDS & RESEARCH OFFICER Mr. Clarence D. Slusher, Jr. SECRETARY Miss Trina Lizama SECURITY OFFICER Mr. Lyndon Mai OFFICE CLEANER Ms. Kimberlyn Marin The Ombudsman of Belize 7.7 The Ombudsman also acknowledges and expresses much appreciation to the staff of the National Assembly: Mr. Eddie Webster, Clerk; Ms. Clarita Pech, Deputy Clerk; Ms. Valentina Emmanuel, Finance Officer; and other members of staff. Without their continued and invaluable support, the Office of the Ombudsman would not function as smoothly as it has. 7.8 Last but not least, the Ombudsman expresses much gratitude to the following persons who provided support and guidance during the past year: the Honourable Kenneth Benjamin, Chief Justice of Belize; Mr. Godwin Arzu, Contractor General; Mr. Gian Gandhi, Legal Adviser, Ministry of Finance; as well as all other persons and institutions who were not mentioned individually. Ombudsman and Staff Page | 33 2014 ANNUAL REPORT VIII. CONCLUSION 8.0 In 2014, the Ombudsman discharged his mandate with a reasonable measure of success. With a limited staff and budget, his Office made measurable strides in dealing fairly and efficaciously with the two hundred and twenty (220) new complaints as well as previous years’ complaints. This is no easy task given the limited resources; the fact that complainant considers his complaint of utmost urgency; and, in many instances, the authorities are slow or reluctant to respond. 8.1 There is still much more work to be done. As stated in the Ombudsman’s introduction this report is not merely a report on the exercise of his functions for the year 2014 but also is a feedback of public opinion and a starting point for reform. In light of this, we would like to make the following recommendations to assist the Ombudsman in better exercising his functions and, generally, for the better protection of fundamental human rights and freedoms in Belize. 8.2 We humbly recommend and petition the Government of Belize the authorities, civil society, and others to: (i) Make the Office of the Ombudsman a constitutional office. (ii) Modify the Ombudsman Act to broaden the jurisdiction of The Ombudsman of Belize the Ombudsman in certain instances. (iii) Support the Ombudsman’s public education campaign and other efforts. One specific recommendation is to continue airing throughout 2015 (and beyond) the “infomercial” on role of the Ombudsman in relation to complaints involving the Government’s response to reports of gender-based violence. This would help the message reach more people and make a more lasting and significant impact. (iv) Formalize work relationships and improve cooperation with the Office of the Ombudsman, specifically, to limit overlap of functions and to provide for the more fair, expeditious, and efficient resolution of complaints. Priority is being given to the Police Department, which accounts for more than half of all new complaints, as well as the Legal Aid Centre. Complaints involving court proceedings are frequently referred to the Legal Aid Center. However, there is no working relationship between the Ombudsman and the Center regarding referrals. (v) Make the Legal Aid Centre of Belize an independent institute. Page | 34 2014 ANNUAL REPORT (vi) Establish an Office of Public Defender for capital and noncapital criminal cases, either as part of or separate from Legal Aid. (vii) Change the Constitution of Belize to provide for the election of Judges of the Supreme Court and Court of Appeal. This would give them stronger security of tenure needed as Guardians of the Constitution and fundamental human rights and freedoms. (viii) Train the staff of the Kolbe Foundation, Prisons Department and others in the procedural rules pertaining to appeals from the Inferior Court and the Supreme Court of Belize. (ix) The Courts should train and make available very skilled, reliable and honest Court interpreters (English/Spanish), especially where Defendants face long-term imprisonment. (x) Appoint ‘Visiting Justices’ to conduct sporadic inspection tours; make inquiry and checks at the Belize Central Prison in the interest of protecting constitutional rights and hearing complaints regarding the infringement or likely infringement of those rights. (xi) Police officers and especially members of the Gang Suppression Unit (GSU) should The Ombudsman of Belize wear body cameras in the conduct of their duties to help reduce the number of allegations of “Police Brutality” and to provide evidence in court proceedings. (xii) Every land transaction – from searches to application to titles, transfer and other transactionshould be logged in real time in a database/network and updated very frequently. Much of this information should be made available online. (xiii) Ratify and incorporate into domestic law important international human rights treaties such as the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights so that Belizeans will be able to fully benefit from the protection of these rights. (xiv) Establish a National Human Rights Institution in Belize. 8.3 Some of the ideas for these recommendations originated from colleagues, complainants, and concerned citizens. Some can be implemented in the short term while others require more thought and preparation and can only be implemented in the long-term. Some will require far more resources than others. They are presented in this Fourteenth Annual Report as a starting point for discussion and consideration. Page | 35 2014 ANNUAL REPORT The Ombudsman of Belize 8.4 For the better execution of his functions, in 2015, the Ombudsman intends to strengthen collaboration and support from the authorities, civil society and other partners working in areas related to human rights. The opportunities for collaboration and linkages include the following: Public Education Advocacy Identifying, elaborating and implementing projects pertaining to the protection of fundamental human rights Strategic Partnerships for coordination, resourcemobilization, costs sharing, projects, and public education Establishment of a National Human Rights Institute Page | 36 2014 ANNUAL REPORT The Ombudsman of Belize APPENDICES Page | 37 2014 ANNUAL REPORT The Ombudsman of Belize APPENDIX 1. STATISTICS Chart 1. 2014 Complaints, by Month* 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Monthly Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Year Total * Monthly percentages of the total (220) complaints received in 2014. Chart 2. Complaints against the Police Department (2012 to 2014) 211 183 250 220 200 150 100 54 99 116 50 0 2012 2013 2014 Police Total Year Total Page | 38 2014 ANNUAL REPORT The Ombudsman of Belize Chart 3. Complaints by District 400 350 116 300 31 250 13 16 15 16 200 District Total Country Total 150 100 50 220 220 220 220 220 220 Corozal Orange Walk Belize Cayo Stann Creek Toledo 0 Page | 39 2014 ANNUAL REPORT The Ombudsman of Belize Chart 4. Complaints, By Subject Matter A. Subject Matter, Ministry of National Security Appeal, Prisons Employment Related Matters 8% 29% False Imprisonment/Malicious Prosecution 4% 9% 2% Legal Counsel, Prisons Misconduct 3% Non-investigation 1% 5% 25% Property/Exhibits 14% Transfer, Prisons Unlawful Search and Seizure Unwarrantable Violence Page | 40 2014 ANNUAL REPORT The Ombudsman of Belize Subject Matter, Other Authorities1 B. Business Lease/License Child Custody & Safety 4% 8% 17% Employment Related Matters 29% Foreclosure Land Matters Other Matters 8% 34% Page | 41 2014 ANNUAL REPORT The Ombudsman of Belize Chart 5. Status of Complaints STATUS AUTHORITY R P N C O CL TOTALS Treasury Department 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 The Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 Min. of Edu./St. Martin Sch. 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 Teaching Services Commission 0 3 0 2 0 0 5 Development Finance Corporation 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 Income Tax Department 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 Reconstruction & Development Corporation 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 Social Security Board 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 Belize Medical Council 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 Cleopatra White Polyclinic 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 Karl Huesner Memorial Hospital Authority 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 Public Health Department 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 Human Services Department 1 2 1 0 0 0 4 Immigration & Nationality Department 2 2 1 0 0 0 5 Court - Family 4 3 4 0 0 0 11 Court - Magistrates 8 2 1 0 0 0 11 Court of Appeals 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 Supreme Court 2 0 0 0 0 1 3 Supreme Court, Vital Statistics 1 2 0 0 0 0 3 Page | 42 2014 ANNUAL REPORT The Ombudsman of Belize Supreme Court, Legal Aid Attorneys-at-law 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 Labour Department 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 Belize City Council 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 Fire Department 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 Liquor Licensing Board 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 Punta Gorda Town Council 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 Belmopan City Council 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 San Pedro Town Council 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 Village Council 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 Belize Coast Guard 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 Belize Defence Force 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 Police Department 12 53 39 10 2 0 116 Prisons Department 2 1 0 0 0 0 3 Lands & Survey Department 2 6 5 2 0 0 15 Ministry of Agriculture 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 Public Services Commission 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 Transport Department 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 Ministry of Works 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 Youth for the Future 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 TOTALS16: 55 86 53 19 2 2 216 16 Does not include informal complaints, such as requests for assistance with land transfers Page | 43 1 2014 ANNUAL REPORT The Ombudsman of Belize LEGEND: R – Complaints referred, refused, terminated or withdrawn P – Preliminary Enquiries are being made to establish reasonable cause N – Notice of complaint and intent to investigate sent to the authorities C – Comments regarding allegations received from the authorities O – Complaints subject of ongoing investigation, after comments received CL – Investigation of complaint completed and filed closed Page | 44 2014 ANNUAL REPORT The Ombudsman of Belize APPENDIX 2. How to Make a Complaint to the Ombudsman Before making a complaint to us, have you already contacted the government department or authority to complain? Please note that we do not usually investigate complaints if you have not raised the complaint with the department or authority first. However, if you feel you have a good reason not to contact the authority first then please call or visit us. To help expedite the investigative process, please try to write down all relevant information pertaining to the department or authority, such as letters, telephone conversations, meetings, dates, names and contact details, before contact us. Also please bring much supporting documents information pertaining to complaint. you in as and your There are several ways to make a complaint: Written complaints – download our written complaint form from our website, and e-mail, fax, mail or hand deliver it to our office. Appointments preferred but Walk-ins welcome. Ombudsman Contact Details: Office/Mailing Address: Email: Website: Facebook: Opening Hours: 91 Freetown Road, Second Floor P.O. Box # 1376 Belize City, Belize Tel: 223-3594 or 223-3198 Fax: 223-3198 [email protected] http://www.ombudsmanbelize.com/ http://www.facebook.com/ombudsman.belize Monday to Friday, 8:00 a.m. – 12:00 p.m. 1:00 p.m. – 5:00 p.m. Page | 45 2014 ANNUAL REPORT The Ombudsman of Belize APPENDIX 3. INVESTIGATIVE PROCESS Written Complaint received by Ombudsman Ombudsman reviews complaint, determines if there is jurisdiction and reasonable cause to investigate, and that the matter is not frivolous, vexatious or too tardy. Decides to Investigate Written Notice of Intent to Investigate sent to Principal Officer of Authority, Officer, Member and Minister Decides not to investigate Decision with reasons given to the Complainant Comments and Supporting Documents, including reports, Report received from the Authority. Information reviewed and additional information & clarifications, by way of Hearings or otherwise, obtained by the Ombudsman. Investigation completed. Findings and Recommendations sent to Principal Officer, Officer and Member for opportunity to be heard. Ombudsman’s Findings & Recommendations Final. Recommendations Implemented by Authority. Case Closed. Recommendations not implemented. Complainant dissatisfied. Ombudsman prepares a Special Report to the National Assembly. Page | 46 2014 ANNUAL REPORT The Ombudsman of Belize APPENDIX 4. The Ombudsman Act, Key Provisions The Ombudsman’s authority to investigate complaints is detailed in the Ombudsman Act. The legislation allows the Ombudsman to produce annual reports and special reports available to the public. The full text of the Act can be found at: http://www.belizelaw.org/lawadmin/ PDF%20files/cap005.pdf It states the following in regards to the powers of the Ombudsman. Namely that the Ombudsman: Section 2 shall regard “authority” as meaning a Ministry, department or agency of Government, the Belize Police Department, a City or Town Council or any other statutory body. Section 4 will serve terms lasting three years. Section 12 may investigate where he has reasonable cause to believe that an authority has been guilty of corruption or wrongdoing or any person may have sustained injustice, injury or abuse as a result of any action taken by an authority. shall not be precluded from investigating any matter where it is open to the complainant to apply to the Supreme Court for redress for contravention of provisions for the protection of fundamental rights and freedoms. Section 13 may investigate on his own initiative or on a complaint made to him. Section 14 may hear complaints made by any person or body of persons but complaints made by an authority. Section 15 may refuse to undertake an investigation if he believes - the complaint is trivial - the complaint is frivolous - the complainant has been deferred for too long - the complainant lack sufficient interest - no investigation is necessary Section 17 may adopt whatever procedure he considers appropriate and may obtain information from such persons and in such manner, and may make such enquiries as he thinks fit. Section 18 may require any officer or member of a public authority to furnish and produce any document in relation to the investigation of any matter. Page | 47 2014 ANNUAL REPORT The Ombudsman of Belize Section 20 may enter any premises occupied by any authority in order to inspect any document or record therein in respect of any matter under investigation. Section 21 shall inform the principal officer of the authority concerned of the result of his investigation and, if necessary, his recommendations for action to be taken by that authority. Section 25 shall regard as secret and confidential all documents, information and things disclosed to them in execution of any of the provisions of this Act. Section 29 shall, when investigating a complaint, record in a register: - the name of the complainant - the subject matter and date of the complaint - the Ombudsman’s decision respecting the complaint Section 30 Every person who wilfully contravenes section 14, makes any false statement to the Ombudsman or who obstructs, hinders or resists the Ombudsman shall be guilty of an offence and liable to summary conviction. Page | 48
© Copyright 2024