1. No category

Quarterly Aggregate
Report
1
2
3
4
2015 • May 7
on remediation progress at RMG
factories covered by the Accord
Statistics as of February 28, 2015
table of content
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
inspections update . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
inspection reports & corrective action plans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
review of findings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
remediation & verification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
1
Introduction
The Accord on Fire and Building Safety in Bangladesh is committed to transparency and
public accountability. As part of this commitment Quarterly Aggregate Reports are published
(Article 19c), providing information on the progress of the implementation of remedial
measures in the Ready-Made Garment (RMG) factories covered by the Accord.
This report provides aggregated information on the initial inspections, safety findings, and
remediation status. Accord signatories and others seeking information on a particular factory
may visit the Accord website inspection page to view all three inspection reports and up-todate Corrective Action Plans (CAPs).
2
INSPECTIONS UPDATE
Under the terms of the Accord, company signatories disclose all their supplier factories in
Bangladesh. This information is consolidated into an aggregated list, including information
pertinent to assessing building safety.
Key information on each factory on the disclosure list includes: factory name and address,
the number of stories of each structure, whether a building includes multiple apparel
factories, whether it houses other types of businesses, the number of workers in the factory,
and the number of Accord signatories with production at each factory.
As stipulated in the Accord Factory Data Disclosure Protocol, a factory is covered
by the Accord if:
1.It has been placed on the list of active and/or approved factories of a signatory company.
2. Production of a signatory company’s products is currently taking place at the factory.
3. Production of a signatory company’s products has taken place at the factory within the
past twelve months and the factory has not been de-listed by the signatory company in
the meantime.
4. An order for products of a signatory company has been placed with the factory, but
production has not yet commenced.
Accord signatory companies update their factory data on an ongoing basis submitting it
directly to the Fair Factories Clearinghouse (FFC), a secure external platform for sharing and
analysing factory information. The Accord updates the publicly available factory list on a
monthly basis.
All factories covered by the Accord are subject to initial inspections and periodic follow-up
inspections to monitor and verify remedial measures. This includes any new factories that
are added to the Accord list of factories by existing or new signatory companies. In January
2015, the Accord started a new round of initial inspections of more than 150 factories that
were added to the Accord list from August 2014 onwards. A further 225 factories producing
for both Accord and Alliance brands have been inspected by the Alliance. The Accord has
reached an agreement with the Alliance for Bangladesh Worker Safety to share inspection
reports for joint factories. The Alliance inspection reports will be used to develop Accord
formatted Corrective Action Plans (CAPs) and to implement Accord remediation
requirements with signatory companies, factories and labour partners.
diagram 1: ACCORD INSPECTIONS UPDATE
1183 Total factories inspected
1
This number is lower
than the total factory list
which includes factories
which had ceased
operation, or had
relocated or had no
active brand at the time
of scheduling.
TOTAL 1
1498
90 New factories scheduled for inspection
225 Joint Accord/Alliance factories inspected by the Alliance
3
INSPECTION REPORTS & CORRECTIVE ACTIONS PLANS
After each factory has been inspected for fire, electrical and structural safety, the inspection
reports are shared with factory owners, the active Accord signatory companies and worker
representatives.
The factory owner and the company signatories are tasked to develop a Corrective Action
Plan (CAP) that details what remedial actions will be taken with a clear timeline and a
financial plan. The Accord has a team of case handlers that provide support in the CAP
development and implementation and work closely with the Accord engineers to provide any
necessary technical guidance.
Once a CAP is finalized by the factory owners and the signatory companies it is submitted to
the Accord for review and approval by the Chief Safety Inspector. After approval, all three
inspection reports and the CAP are uploaded to the Accord database and website. CAPs are
updated after Accord engineers have conducted follow-up inspections and verified corrective
actions were properly completed. The difference between the number of CAPs approved and
CAPs published online is related to the fact that the Accord has been holding off on
publishing CAPs for a while in order to build the technological capacity in the Fair Factories
Clearinghouse (FFC) database to show whether a finance plan has been agreed for each CAP.
diagram 2: CAP Development
898
CAPs received by Accord
817
714
CAPs approved by Accord
598
540
500
CAPs published on the Accord website
224
CAPs updated after follow-up inspection reports
28-02-2015
4
30-11-2014
73
REVIEW OF FINDINGS
The fire, electrical and structural findings from inspections form the basis of the Corrective
Action Plan. Once the CAP is published, the Accord tracks the total number of findings and
their status. The numbers presented here therefore represent all reported findings in
published CAPs.
DIAGRAM 3: TOTAL REPORTED FINDINGS (Published CAPs)
Electrical
Fire
19678
* Total issues based on
published CAPs only
21128
18989
19209
13938
14095
30-11-2014
Total* 52605
54432
28-02-2015
Structural
Overview of common findings
Most of the findings that are reported in published CAPs continue to be commonly found
findings, such as unsafe means of egress, unsafe electrical installations and weak structures.
Lack of fire separations between floors and adequate fire doors are common in almost all
factories inspected by the Accord.
Most buildings are not constructed in accordance with the structural design drawings. In just
over 10% of the factories inspected, this resulted in an immediate requirement to reduce the
loads in the building, such as storage, water tanks and other weight.
2
Please see the Accord’s Glossary
of Terms for an explanation of
the terms used here:
http://bangladeshaccord.org/
wp-content/uploads/
Glossary-of-Terms.pdf
5
The common safety hazards that need to be remediated include:2
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Lack of certified fire doors in stairwells
Inadequate automatic fire alarm systems
Inadequate fire separations and protected exits
Excess combustible material (fire load) in areas where people are working
Loose electrical connections and inadequate earthing (grounding) systems
Accumulation of dust and lint on electrical wiring
Inadequate space for electrical installations such as substations
Electrical phases that are imbalanced or overloaded
Lack of lateral stability in the structure
Lack of accurate structural drawings
Lack of management load plans to avoid excess weight in certain parts of the building
Factories requiring Detailed Engineering Assessments (DEAs)
The Accord structural inspection reports are used in discussion with the supplier or factory
owner as a means to rectify or address any observations made. The initial structural
inspection is not comprehensive and is limited to what could be observed during a visual
initial inspection of the building. As a result, many factories are required to undertake a
structural Detailed Engineering Assessment (DEA) of (specific parts of) the building.
DEAs are submitted to the Accord and reviewed by our engineers. If the assessment is
generally acceptable, a meeting is arranged where the submitting structural engineer
presents the findings, which may lead to acceptance by the Accord or a requirement for
more information.
DEAs for factories with reduced production due to structural concerns are being processed
as a priority.
The diagram below shows the progress made in DEA development and approval by the
Accord, the number of DEAs submitted to the Accord, the number of DEAs which were
presented to the Accord in a meeting for approval, and finally the approved DEAs to date.
diagram 4: DEA STATUS
297
DEAs submitted by factories and brands
for Accord approval
178
133
DEA presentations to the Accord by factories
31
35
DEAs approved by CSI
28-02-2015
30-11-2014
11
A need for additional guidance for local engineers conducting DEAs has been identified, and
the Accord has contracted with the engineer firm WSP to develop a DEA guidance manual.
6
Factories requiring Fire Design & Drawing
The Accord fire safety inspections may result in the requirement of the factory to install fire
protection systems such as automatic fire alarm systems, automatic sprinkler systems and
hydrant systems. The design drawings for these systems must be submitted to the Accord for
review and acceptance prior to installation of the system.
diagram 5: Fire Design & DRAWING
265
269
Total Fire Design & Drawing Received from Factory
Total Design Reviewed by Engineer
144
Total Design Approved by Lead Fire Engineer
Factories submitted to the Review Panel
In 19 building structure inspections, the Accord found that the structural integrity of the
building fell so far below the acceptable level of safety that there was a severe and imminent
risk of structural failure. This led the Accord to submit its inspection results to the
Government of Bangladesh’ Review Panel. The Review Panel was established for inspections
which lead to determinations that a building evacuation or suspension to operations is
required. In order to overturn the initial production suspension / evacuation
recommendation of the inspection, a unanimous decision of the team of 4 Review Panel
engineers (1 Accord, 1 Alliance, 2 Government of Bangladesh/Bangladesh University for
Engineering Technology) must be reached.
The new round of initial inspection that started in January 2015 has so far not lead to new
factories being submitted to the Review Panel as a result of structural inspections. In one
case, the Accord initial inspections had serious fire safety findings which require the building
to be fully evacuated until such time that the necessary remedial measures regarding fire
exits are completed. The Inspector General of Ministry of Labour and Employment (MoLE)
subsequently issued an order of evacuation of the factory building. Despite being repeatedly
informed of the serious safety findings and the need for the building to be evacuated until
proper fire exiting is installed, the factory owner refuses to evacuate the building. This has
led the Accord to publish a statement on its website about the refusal to temporarily evacuate
the factory and advise the Accord signatories that the factory is no longer eligible for
production to Accord signatory companies.
The Accord has developed a separate webpage on its website that provides more details on
the factories submitted to the Review Panel, such as a summary of reasons for submission,
information about the current operational status of the factory/building, and information
about the status of employment of the affected workers.³
3
http://bangladeshaccord.org/
factories/review-panel-cases
7
The Accord is working with owners, brands, and labour in these cases in the three critical
areas of: expediting remediation, ensuring wages are paid, and verifying employment is
maintained. This is very challenging work but the Accord is working to obtain credible and
verified information from brands, labour, owners, and through our own efforts to ensure the
provisions of the Accord are being upheld.
REMEDIATION & VERIFICATION
Table 1 provides an overview of the status of inspection findings that are reported in the
published CAPs.
• In progress: This means that the inspection finding is in progress towards remediation.
• Pending verification: The Accord has been informed that the finding has been corrected
but the Accord is yet to verify this.
• C orrected: The finding has been verified by the Accord engineers as being corrected
through their follow-up verification visits.
TABLE 1: STATUS OF FINDINGS (In published CAPs)
total
30-11-2014
total
28-02-2015
IN PROGRESS
41575
42212
PENDING VERIFICATION
10248
9641
CORRECTED
782
2579
TOTAL issues
52605
54432
Diagram 6: Status of fire, electrical and structural issues
14913
15678
11678
11621
2124
2252
136
222
13938
14095
28-02-2015
15691
30-11-2014
14206
4379
4869
in progress
3255
pending
verification
3010
8
19678
21128
28-02-2015
total
30-11-2014
603
total
43
521
18989
19209
28-02-2015
corrected
30-11-2014
1836
total
Follow-up inspections
The Accord engineers are monitoring progress and verifying implementation of CAPs. Accord
engineers are conducting follow up inspections to verify corrective actions have been
completed correctly.
In this quarter, only 151 follow-up inspections have been done due to political unrest in
Bangladesh.
As the political unrest stabilises we are getting back to full capacity of an anticipated 200
follow-up inspections a month. The Accord anticipates a minimum of 2 to 3 visits to each
factory to verify all issues are adequately remediated.
As the coordination of efforts with signatory companies are streamlined, it is anticipated that
less Accord visits may be required as we will be getting status information from the signatory
representatives. The Accord will verify all remediation, but prioritizing follow up inspections
will be more efficient when reliable information is coming from signatory representatives.
In addition to the teams undertaking follow-up fire, electrical and structural inspections to
verify CAP implementation, one team of structural engineers inspects factories with major
structural concerns which required immediate attention. The reasons for the structural
follow-up inspections are to verify whether or not required immediate actions were taken, to
verify the information provided in the DEA is correct, and to verify retrofitting works.
Eleven special inspections have been conducted as a result of safety complaints and fire
incident investigations.
diagram 7: ACCORD FOLLOW-UP INSPECTION
379
Follow-up inspections by
the Structural team on
factories requiring urgent
action
TOTAL
follow up
inspections
617
227 Fire, Electrical & Structural
combined (for CAP follow-up)
11 Special inspections by different teams
After the Accord engineers have undertaken a follow-up inspection, they generate a detailed
report and update the CAPs. The detailed report is sent to the factory, related company
signatories and union signatories. This report includes an explanation of any new findings and
pictorial evidence of remediation. The updated CAP is published on the Accord website and
shows the progress status of each finding and includes any new findings. As of 28th February
2015, 224 follow-up inspection reports (fire, electrical and structural) have been sent.
In cases where the Accord engineers are not satisfied with the remediation work of the
factory, the Lead Engineer issues a non-compliance letter to the factory, the company
signatories and labour signatories.
9
As of 28th February 2015, the Accord has issued non-compliance letters for 28 of the 224
factories referenced above. If no action is taken following this letter and the Accord does not
see adequate progress, the signatory companies in the factory will be required to invoke the
provisions of the Accord related to non-compliance with required remediation. Such
provisions include termination of business relations and public disclosure of the noncompliance on the Accord website.
Colophon
Title
uarterly Aggregate Report Q
on remediation progress at RGM factories covered by the Accord
Date
May 7, 2015
Author
Graphic Design
Bangladesh Accord Secretariat
JUSTAR.NL
Title:
Date
:
Author:
Bangladesh Accord Foundation
Level 13, AJ Heights
Cha 72/1/d, Pragati Sarani
North Badda, Dhaka - 1212
Bangladesh
Tel +88017666900
Keizersgracht 62-64
1015 CS Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel +31 (0) 20 520 7431
[email protected]
www.bangladeshaccord.org
accord
for a safe
ready-made garment industry
in Bangladesh