Blackpool Joint Strategic
Needs Assessment
Core Document
Chapter 1 Population and
Neighbourhoods in Blackpool
March 2015
Chapter 1 - Population and Neighbourhoods in Blackpool
Contents
Key points for commissioners
04
Demographics
05
Ethnicity
06
Other Ethnic Groups Living in Blackpool
07
Geo-demographic Segmentation
08
Population Projections
12
Population Turnover
13
Births / Deaths
15
Deprivation
16
Page 2 of 22
Chapter 1 - Population and Neighbourhoods in Blackpool
Figures
Figure 3 - Population Pyramid (Mid 2013 Estimated Resident Population) – NHS Blackpool
05
Figure 4 - Estimated resident population by ethnic group and sex, Census 2011
06
Figure 5 - Other Ethnic Groups Living in Blackpool
07
Figure 6 - Percentage of households in Mosaic groups – Blackpool
08
Figure 7 - Percentage of households in Mosaic groups – comparison of Blackpool, North West
and the UK
09
Figure 8 – Map of Mosaic Groups in Blackpool
10
Figure 9 - Top 5 Mosaic Types in NHS Blackpool
12
Figure 10 – 2012 based Subnational Population Projections for Blackpool
13
Figure 11 – Projected Components of Population Change
14
Figure 12 - Population inflows and outflows in Blackpool
15
Figure 13 - Births and deaths ratio
16
Figure 14 - Map of IMD 2010 for Blackpool
17
Figure 15 - Weightings of IMD
17
Figure 16 - Income and Employment domains of IMD 2010
18
Figure 17 - Health and Education domains of IMD 2010
19
Figure 18 - Barriers to Housing and Crime domains of IMD 2010
20
Figure 19 - Living Environment domain of IMD 2010 and Change in IMD from 2007-2010
21
Tables
Table 1 - Mid 2013 Estimated Resident Population
05
Table 2 - 2009 Estimated Resident Population by Ethnic Group
06
Table 3 – Population by Mosaic Type in Blackpool
10
Table 4 – Births and Deaths Ratio
15
Page 3 of 22
Chapter 1 - Population and Neighbourhoods in Blackpool
Key points for commissioners








Blackpool has a greater proportion of people aged 65 and over than England and Wales
The percentage of Blackpool’s population who are members of minority ethnic groups is 3.3%
compared to 14% in England and Wales
Blackpool has a much greater proportion of people in Mosaic Group I and J than England and
Wales
Between 2002 and 2011 Blackpool consistently had fewer births than deaths
The biggest contributor to Blackpool’s recent decrease in population is migration out of
Blackpool, however the population of Blackpool is predicted to grow steadily over the coming
years
Future service and capacity requirements for an increasingly older population, for example
dementia, social care, stroke, social isolation
Use of social marketing techniques for effective targeting of health messages can be supported
using the Mosaic profiles in this chapter of the JSNA
Some areas in Blackpool have extremely high levels of population inflow and outflow, e.g.
South Beach
Page 4 of 22
Chapter 1 - Population and Neighbourhoods in Blackpool
Demographics
The resident population of Blackpool is approximately 142,000. Mid 2013 population estimates (Table 1)
illustrates that older people (65 years plus) account for a greater proportion of Blackpool’s resident population
than observed at national level.
Table 1 - Mid 2013 Estimated Resident Population
Total
Population
Number
England and Wales
Blackpool
Males
Number
Females
%
Number
Aged 0 -14
%
Number
Aged 65+
%
Number
%
56,948,229
28,049,196
49.3%
28,899,033
50.7%
10,097,187
17.7%
9,905,809
17.4%
141,400
69,488
49.1%
71,912
50.9%
23,842
16.9%
28,179
19.9%
Source: ONS
Blackpool’s population pyramid (Figure 3) displays a higher proportion than England of people over 55 years of
age, and a much lower proportion in ages younger than 35. The age band 30-35, in particular, has a considerably
lower proportion than England. Blackpool reflects England's higher proportion of females in the older age bands
than males.
Figure 3 - Population Pyramid (Mid 2013 Estimated Resident Population) – NHS Blackpool
Population Pyramid Mid-2013 Population Estimates
85+
80-84
75-79
70-74
65-69
Ageband
60-64
55-59
50-54
45-49
40-44
35-39
30-34
25-29
20-24
15-19
10-14
5-9
0-4
5.0%
4.0%
3.0%
2.0%
Blackpool Males
1.0%
0.0%
1.0%
2.0%
3.0%
4.0%
% in Ageband
Blackpool Females
England and Wales Males
Source: ONS
Page 5 of 22
England and Wales Females
5.0%
Chapter 1 - Population and Neighbourhoods in Blackpool
Ethnicity
The 2011 Census indicate that a significantly smaller percentage of ethnic minority groups live in Blackpool
compared to the North West and England and Wales. 3.3% of Blackpool’s residents are classed as ethnic
minorities compared to 9.88% in the North West and 14% in England (Figure 4).
Figure 4 - Estimated resident population by ethnic group and sex, Census 2011
Estimated Resident Population by Ethnic Group - Census 2011
White: English/Welsh/Scottish/Northern Irish/British
White: Irish
White: Gypsy or Irish Traveller
Blackpool
White: Other White
Mixed/multiple ethnic group: White and Black Caribbean
Mixed/multiple ethnic group: White and Black African
Mixed/multiple ethnic group: White and Asian
Mixed/multiple ethnic group: Other Mixed
NORTH
WEST
Asian/Asian British: Indian
Asian/Asian British: Pakistani
Asian/Asian British: Bangladeshi
Asian/Asian British: Chinese
Asian/Asian British: Other Asian
ENGLAND
AND WALES
Black/African/Caribbean/Black British: African
Black/African/Caribbean/Black British: Caribbean
Black/African/Caribbean/Black British: Other Black
80
85
90
95
100 Other ethnic group: Arab
%
Other ethnic group: Any other ethnic group
Source: ONS
Table 2 - 2009 Estimated Resident Population by Ethnic Group
Ethnicity
White
Mixed
Asian or Asian British
Black or Black British
Chinese or other
Blackpool
Persons
%
137,339
1,753
2,282
346
345
North West
Persons
%
96.7%
1.2%
1.6%
0.2%
0.2%
6,361,716
110,891
437,485
97,869
44,216
Source: ONS
Page 6 of 22
England and Wales
Persons
%
90.2%
1.6%
6.2%
1.4%
0.6%
48,209,395
1,224,400
4,213,531
1,864,890
563,696
86.0%
2.2%
7.5%
3.3%
1.0%
Chapter 1 - Population and Neighbourhoods in Blackpool
Other Ethnic Groups Living in Blackpool
In Blackpool there are 6 LSOAs with relatively high proportions of the population in Black and Minority Ethnic
(BME) groups and these neighbourhoods are shown in Figure 5. The BME populations are predominantly of Asian
background.
Figure 5 - Other Ethnic Groups Living in Blackpool
Source: Neighbourhood Statistics - ONS
Page 7 of 22
Chapter 1 - Population and Neighbourhoods in Blackpool
Geo-demographic Segmentation
MOSAIC is a demographic profiling tool that is produced by Experian. MOSAIC categorises all households and
postcodes into ‘segments.’ Each segment shares a set of statistically similar behaviours, interests or
demographics. MOSAIC is especially useful for providing insight into the local population, service users and
neighbourhoods and can be used to support sophisticated service development – right through from initial
feasibility research into service design and marketing.
The most recent version of MOSAIC was released in 2014. Households are categorised by 15 broad MOSAIC
segments called ‘groups.’ These groups can be further broken down into 66 detailed MOSAIC segments called
‘types’. Each group or type has an associated name and a detailed statistical profile. It is these profiles that paint a
rich picture of the segments and provide insight into the local population.
Clearly not every one of the country's postcodes/households matches exactly to just one of the sixty nine different
Mosaic types. These descriptions are what sociologists describe as 'ideal types', pure examples to which individual cases
approximate only with various degrees of exactness. They focus on the statistical bias of a type of neighbourhood, on
the demographic categories which are more numerous there than elsewhere in the country and which give the
neighbourhood its distinctive character. In addition, because the boundaries of postcodes and census output areas do
not exactly match boundaries in housing type, it is inevitable that addresses close to boundaries may in certain cases
not appear to have been allocated to the most suitable category. There are cases too where the same types of
neighbourhood will contain people of similar character and behaviour but living in very different types of accommodation
according to where in the country they may live. [Experian 2009]
The following are the total count and percentages of households within each high level mosaic group. A large
majority of households fall into four Groups K, L, M and E, representing 60% of all households in Blackpool.
Figure 6 - Percentage of households in Mosaic groups – Blackpool
Group Name
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
One Line Description
Well-off ow ners in rural locations enjoying the
Country Living
benefits of country life
Established families in large detached homes living
Prestige Positions
upmarket lifestyles
High status city dw ellers living in central locations
City Prosperity
and pursuing careers w ith high rew ards
Thriving families w ho are busy bringing up children
Domestic Success
and follow ing careers
Mature suburban ow ners living settled lives in midSuburban Stability
range housing
Elderly people w ith assets w ho are enjoying a
Senior Security
comfortable retirement
Householders living in inexpensive homes in village
Rural Reality
communities
Younger households settling dow n in housing priced
Aspiring Homemakers
w ithin their means
Residents of settled urban communities w ith a
Urban Cohesion
strong sense of identity
Educated young people privately renting in urban
Rental Hubs
neighbourhoods
Mature homeow ners of value homes enjoying stable
Modest Traditions
lifestyles
Single people privately renting low cost homes for
Transient Renters
the short term
Families w ith limited resources w ho have to budget
Family Basics
to make ends meet
Elderly people reliant on support to meet financial or
Vintage Value
practical needs
Urban renters of social housing facing an array of
Municipal Challenge
challenges
Page 8 of 22
Households
%
22
0%
638
1%
0
0%
1117
2%
5544
8%
7014
11%
13
0%
7203
11%
84
0%
1543
2%
9472
14%
14065
21%
7769
12%
8079
12%
3372
5%
Bar
Chapter 1 - Population and Neighbourhoods in Blackpool
The bar charts below show how households in each area are categorised. Blackpool has a bias toward the K
to O segments with higher percentages of households in these groups.
Figure 7 - Percentage of households in Mosaic groups – comparison of Blackpool, North West and the UK
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
UK
Fylde Coast
Blackpool
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Source: Experian - Mosaic Public Sector 2014
Each Blackpool postcode has been designated a Mosaic group that is most representative of the households it
contains. This is visually represented in Figure 8.
Page 9 of 22
Chapter 1 - Population and Neighbourhoods in Blackpool
Figure 8 – Map of Mosaic Groups in Blackpool
Source: Mosaic Public Sector 2014
Page 10 of 22
Chapter 1 - Population and Neighbourhoods in Blackpool
Mosaic further divides groups into 66 types to allow a more in-depth understanding of the geo-demographic
makeup of the residents of Blackpool. Table 3 displays all the mosaic types, and the number and proportion of
Blackpool’s population in each.
Table 3 – Population by Mosaic Type in Blackpool
Type
Name
Description
B05
Empty-Nest Adventure
Mature couples in comfortable detached houses who have the means to enjoy their empty-nest status
B06
Bank of Mum and Dad
Well-off families in upmarket suburban homes where grown-up children benefit from continued
financial support
D15
Modern Parents
Busy couples in modern detached homes balancing the demands of school-age children and careers
D16
Mid-Career Convention
Professional families with children in traditional mid-range suburbs where neighbours are often older
D17
Thriving Independence
Well-qualified older singles with incomes from successful professional careers living in good quality
housing
E18
Dependable Me
Single mature owners settled in traditional suburban semis working in intermediate occupations
Num
Pre-retirement couples with respectable incomes enjoying greater space and spare cash since children
left home
Long-term couples with mid-range incomes whose adult children have returned to the shelter of the
family home
Active families with teenage and adult children whose prolonged support is eating up household
resources
E19
Fledgling Free
E20
Boomerang Boarders
E21
Family Ties
F22
Legacy Elders
Elders now mostly living alone in comfortable suburban homes on final salary pensions
F23
Solo Retirees
Senior singles whose reduced incomes are satisfactory in their affordable but pleasant owned homes
F24
Bungalow Haven
F25
Classic Grandparents
Seniors appreciating the calm of bungalow estates designed for the elderly
Lifelong couples in standard suburban homes enjoying retirement through grandchildren and
gardening
H30
Affordable Fringe
Settled families with children owning modest, 3-bed semis in areas of more affordable housing
Pre-family newcomers who have bought value homes with space to grow in affordable but pleasant
areas
Young singles on starter salaries choosing to rent homes in family suburbs
Forward-thinking younger families who sought affordable homes in good suburbs which they may now
be out-growing
H31
First-Rung Futures
H32
Flying Solo
H35
Primary Ambitions
J45
Bus-Route Renters
Singles renting affordable private flats away from central amenities and often on main roads
K46
Self Supporters
Hard-working mature singles who own budget terraces manageable within their modest wage
K47
Offspring Overspill
Lower income owners whose adult children are still striving to gain independence meaning space is
limited
K48
Down-to-Earth Owners
Ageing couples who have owned their inexpensive home for many years while working in routine jobs
L49
Disconnected Youth
Young people endeavouring to gain employment footholds while renting cheap flats and terraces
L50
Renting a Room
Transient renters of low cost accommodation often within subdivided older properties
L51
Make Do & Move On
Yet to settle younger singles and couples making interim homes in low cost properties
L52
Midlife Stopgap
Maturing singles in employment who are renting short-term affordable homes
M53
Budget Generations
Families supporting both adult and younger children where expenditure can often exceed income
M54
Childcare Squeeze
Younger families with children who own a budget home and are striving to cover all expenses
M55
Families with Needs
N57
Seasoned Survivors
N58
Aided Elderly
N59
Pocket Pensions
Families with many children living in areas of high deprivation and who need support
Deep-rooted single elderly owners of low value properties whose modest home equity provides some
security
Supported elders in specialised accommodation including retirement homes and complexes of small
homes
Elderly singles of limited means renting in developments of compact social homes
N60
Dependent Greys
Ageing social renters with high levels of need in centrally located developments of small units
N61
Estate Veterans
Longstanding elderly renters of social homes who have seen neighbours change to a mix of owners and
renters
O62
Low Income Workers
Older social renters settled in low value homes in communities where employment is harder to find
O63
Streetwise Singles
Hard-pressed singles in low cost social flats searching for opportunities
Source: Mosaic Public Sector 2014
Page 11 of 22
%
246
0.4%
238
0.4%
208
0.3%
452
0.7%
422
0.6%
1790
2.7%
1256
1.9%
1038
1.6%
1460
2.2%
289
0.4%
3187
2043
4.8%
3.1%
1495
2.3%
3185
4.8%
2508
648
3.8%
1.0%
783
1.2%
1428
2.2%
4334
6.6%
3306
5.0%
1832
2.8%
1245
1.9%
8717
13.2%
1571
2532
2.4%
3.8%
1848
2.8%
4205
1540
6.4%
2.3%
3925
6.0%
880
400
1.3%
0.6%
2470
3.7%
404
0.6%
1559
1621
2.4%
2.5%
Chapter 1 - Population and Neighbourhoods in Blackpool
Figure 9 displays the key attributes for the 5 biggest Mosaic Types in NHS Blackpool.
Figure 9 - Top 5 Mosaic Types in NHS Blackpool
Type L50: Renting a Room - Transient renters of low cost accommodation often within subdivided older
properties






Singles and homesharers
Short term private renters
Low rent accommodation
Often Victorian terraces
Most likely to get a lift to work
Low wage occupations
Type K46: Self Supporters - Hard-working mature singles who own budget terraces manageable within their
modest wage






Aged 46-65
Singles living alone
Income typically £20-25k
Own 2 or 3 bedroom small homes
Still working
Often terraces
Type M54: Childcare Squeeze - Younger families with children who own a budget home and are striving to
cover all expenses






Married or cohabiting couples
Likely to have pre-school children
Outgoings high in proportion to income
Own low value homes
Both parents working
Unsecured personal loans
Type N57: Seasoned Survivors - Deep-rooted single elderly owners of low value properties whose modest home
equity provides some security






Very elderly
Most are living alone
Longest length of residence (29 years)
Modest income
Own mostly 2 or 3 bed terraces
Retired from routine / semi-skilled jobs
Page 12 of 22
Chapter 1 - Population and Neighbourhoods in Blackpool
Type K47: Offspring Overspill - Lower income owners whose adult children are still striving to gain
independence meaning space is limited






Pre-retirement
Families with adult children
Individual incomes not high
Better off if children are contributing
Own 3 bed semis and terraces
Bills can become a struggle
Population Projections
Projections of the population of Blackpool indicate that the number of residents over 65 will show a considerable
increase within the next 20 years, far in excess of the levels of increase shown in all other age bands (Figure 10).
The total population of Blackpool is projected to grow in the longer term from 142,000 in 2012 to 142,700 in 2032
(ONS mid-2010 based population estimates).
Figure 10 – 2012 based Subnational Population Projections for Blackpool
Mid-2012 Based Population Projections - Blackpool
50
45
Population (thousands)
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
0-19
Year
20-44
45-64
65+
Source: Subnational population projections - ONS
There are four factors that affect population change: birth rate, death rate, immigration and emigration. The
difference between the number of births and the number of deaths is the net change in population due to natural
change. Figure 11 displays projected changes in Blackpool’s population from natural change, immigration and
emigration. The main contributory factor for Blackpool’s projected increase in population size is migration to
Blackpool from within the country.
Page 13 of 22
Chapter 1 - Population and Neighbourhoods in Blackpool
Figure 11 – Projected Components of Population Change
Projected Components of Population Change - Blackpool
1000
156
152
800
Population Change
150
148
600
146
144
400
142
140
200
138
Population Estimate (thousands)
154
136
0
134
Natural Change
All Migration Net
Total Change
Population
Source: Populations Unit ONS
Population Turnover
Transience has been an identified issue in Blackpool for a long time and a recent data review has been
undertaken to identify whether there is a reliable quantitative source of information that can help us understand
this issue.
Population turnover statistics identify that some areas in Blackpool have extremely high levels of population
inflow and outflow. The Middle Layer Super Output Area (MSOA) which contains South Beach has a population
inflow rate of 193 per 1000 population, which is the 65th highest inflow rate of the 7,194 MSOAs in England.
Source: Neighbourhood Statistics, Population Turnover 2009-2010 - ONS
Further analysis of GP Register data suggests a small number of people move more than 3 times a year (less than
2%), and that the age group most likely to move at least once is young people aged 20-29.
Page 14 of 22
Chapter 1 - Population and Neighbourhoods in Blackpool
Figure 12 summarises the inflows and outflows over the course of a single year.
Figure 12 - Population inflows and outflows in Blackpool – Mid-year 2012 to 2013 Change
Starting Population
141,976
•Children born
in the year
 Births
•+1,768


 Internal •Inflow from other
local authorities
 Migration • +7,916


•Inflow from other
International
 Migration countries:
• +416


 Short Term •Workday & Short
Population
Term Migration
• +1,839
Population
Turnover
(Internal
Movement)
10,000
Deaths
•Deaths within
the year
•-1,853
Internal
Migration
•Outflow to other
local authorities
• -8,326
International
Migration
•Outflow to other
countries:
• -512
Short Term
Population
•Workday & Short
Term Migration
•-1,839
Ending Population
141,400
Source: Populations Unit ONS
Page 15 of 22
Chapter 1 - Population and Neighbourhoods in Blackpool
Births / Deaths
The ratio of births and deaths (Figure 13) in Blackpool shows a consistently greater number of deaths than births.
However, observation of the trend data shows a small overall increase in the birth to death ratio.
Figure 13 - Births and deaths ratio
Births and Deaths Ratio - Blackpool
1.20
Births/Deaths Ratio
1.10
1.00
0.90
0.80
0.70
0.60
Year
Births/Deaths Ratio
Source: ONS (Crown Copyright)
Table 4 – Births and Deaths Ratio
Year
Live Births
Deaths All
Ages
Births/Deaths
Ratio
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
1,722
-
1,528
1,523
1,397
1,403
1,549
1,686
1,649
1,655
1,694
1,745
1,725
1,777
1,735
1,770
2,251
-
2,109
2,120
2,124
2,100
2,114
1,953
1,976
1,921
1,876
1,900
1,803
1,880
1,818
1,822
0.72
0.72
0.66
0.67
0.73
0.86
0.83
0.86
0.90
0.92
0.96
0.95
0.95
0.97
0.76
Source: ONS (Crown Copyright)
Page 16 of 22
Chapter 1 - Population and Neighbourhoods in Blackpool
Deprivation
Blackpool experiences considerable levels of disadvantage, and in 2010 ranked as the 6th most deprived of 354
local authorities in England. 46 out of 94 small areas within Blackpool are amongst the 20% most deprived areas
of the country and there are no areas
amongst the 20% most affluent (Figure
Figure 14 - Map of IMD 2010 for Blackpool
14). Blackpool’s relative position in the
national deprivation rankings has
Index of Multiple Deprivation 2010
Anchorsholme
Anchorsholme
National Decile
worsened over the last 5 years from
10
9
24th most deprived in 2004 and 12th
8
most deprived in 2007.
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
Norbreck
Norbreck
The Index of Multiple Deprivation 2010
combines a number of indicators,
chosen to cover a range of economic,
social and housing issues, into a single
deprivation score for each small area in
England. This allows each area to be
ranked relative to one another
according to their level of deprivation.
Indices of Deprivation are an important
tool for identifying the most
disadvantaged areas in England so that
resources could be appropriately
targeted.
Ingthorpe
Ingthorpe
Bispham
Bispham
Greenlands
Greenlands
Warbreck
Warbreck
Layton
Layton
Claremont
Claremont
Park
Park
The IMD 2010 contains seven domains
of deprivation. Figure 15 displays the
indicators in each domain, and the
weighting of the domains in the
composite IMD score.
Brunswick
Brunswick
Talbot
Talbot
Figure 15 - Weightings of IMD
Tyldesley
Tyldesley
Marton
Marton
Bloomfield
Bloomfield
Victoria
Victoria
Clifton
Clifton
Hawes
Hawes Side
Side
Waterloo
Waterloo
Highfield
Highfield
Squires
SquiresGate
Gate
Stanley
Stanley
Page 17 of 22
Chapter 1 - Population and Neighbourhoods in Blackpool
Figure 16 - Income and Employment domains of IMD 2010
INCOME DOMAIN
EMPLOYMENT DOMAIN
Index of Multiple Deprivation 2010
Anchorsholme
Anchorsholme
Anchorsholme
Anchorsholme
National Decile
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
Norbreck
Norbreck
Norbreck
Norbreck
Ingthorpe
Ingthorpe
Ingthorpe
Ingthorpe
Bispham
Bispham
Bispham
Bispham
Greenlands
Greenlands
Greenlands
Greenlands
Warbreck
Warbreck
Warbreck
Warbreck
Layton
Layton
Claremont
Claremont
Park
Park
Layton
Layton
Claremont
Claremont
Brunswick
Brunswick
Park
Park
Brunswick
Brunswick
Talbot
Talbot
Talbot
Talbot
Tyldesley
Tyldesley
Tyldesley
Tyldesley
Marton
Marton
Bloomfield
Bloomfield
Marton
Marton
Bloomfield
Bloomfield
Victoria
Victoria
Victoria
Victoria
Clifton
Clifton
Clifton
Clifton
Hawes
Hawes Side
Side
Hawes
Hawes Side
Side
Waterloo
Waterloo
Waterloo
Waterloo
Highfield
Highfield
Squires
SquiresGate
Gate
Highfield
Highfield
Stanley
Stanley
Squires
SquiresGate
Gate
Adults and children in Income Support families (A)
Adults and children in income-based Jobseeker’s
Allowance families (B)
Adults and children in Pension Credit (Guarantee) families
(C)
Adults and children in certain Child Tax Credit families (D)
Asylum seekers receiving subsistence/ accommodation
support (E)
Stanley
Stanley
Claimants of Jobseeker’s Allowance (A)
Claimants of Incapacity Benefit (B)
Claimants of Severe Disablement Allowance (C)
Claimants of Employment and Support
Allowance (D) Participants in New Deal for under 25s (E)
Participants in New Deal for 25 + (F)
Participants in New Deal for Lone Parents (G)
Page 18 of 22
Chapter 1 - Population and Neighbourhoods in Blackpool
Figure 17 - Health and Education domains of IMD 2010
HEALTH AND DISABILITY DOMAIN
EDUCATION DOMAIN
Index of Multiple Deprivation 2010
National Decile
Anchorsholme
Anchorsholme
Anchorsholme
Anchorsholme
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
Norbreck
Norbreck
Norbreck
Norbreck
Ingthorpe
Ingthorpe
Ingthorpe
Ingthorpe
Bispham
Bispham
Bispham
Bispham
Greenlands
Greenlands
Greenlands
Greenlands
Warbreck
Warbreck
Warbreck
Warbreck
Layton
Layton
Claremont
Claremont
Park
Park
Layton
Layton
Claremont
Claremont
Brunswick
Brunswick
Park
Park
Brunswick
Brunswick
Talbot
Talbot
Talbot
Talbot
Tyldesley
Tyldesley
Tyldesley
Tyldesley
Marton
Marton
Bloomfield
Bloomfield
Marton
Marton
Bloomfield
Bloomfield
Victoria
Victoria
Victoria
Victoria
Clifton
Clifton
Clifton
Clifton
Hawes
Hawes Side
Side
Hawes
Hawes Side
Side
Waterloo
Waterloo
Waterloo
Waterloo
Highfield
Highfield
Squires
SquiresGate
Gate
Highfield
Highfield
Stanley
Stanley
Years of Potential Life Lost (A)
Comparative Illness and Disability Ratio (B)
Acute morbidity (C)
Mood or anxiety disorders (D)
Squires
SquiresGate
Gate
CHILDREN:
KS2 attainment (A)
KS3 attainment (B)
KS4 attainment (C)
Secondary school absence (D)
Staying on in education (E)
Entry to higher education (F)
SKILLS:
Adult skills (G)
Page 19 of 22
Stanley
Stanley
Chapter 1 - Population and Neighbourhoods in Blackpool
Figure 18 - Barriers to Housing and Crime domains of IMD 2010
HOUSING AND SERVICES DOMAIN
Anchorsholme
Anchorsholme
CRIME DOMAIN
Anchorsholme
Anchorsholme
Index of Multiple Deprivation 2010
National Decile
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
Norbreck
Norbreck
Ingthorpe
Ingthorpe
Norbreck
Norbreck
Ingthorpe
Ingthorpe
Bispham
Bispham
Bispham
Bispham
Greenlands
Greenlands
Greenlands
Greenlands
Warbreck
Warbreck
Warbreck
Warbreck
Layton
Layton
Claremont
Claremont
Park
Park
Layton
Layton
Claremont
Claremont
Brunswick
Brunswick
Park
Park
Brunswick
Brunswick
Talbot
Talbot
Talbot
Talbot
Tyldesley
Tyldesley
Tyldesley
Tyldesley
Marton
Marton
Bloomfield
Bloomfield
Marton
Marton
Bloomfield
Bloomfield
Victoria
Victoria
Victoria
Victoria
Clifton
Clifton
Clifton
Clifton
Hawes
Hawes Side
Side
Hawes
Hawes Side
Side
Waterloo
Waterloo
Waterloo
Waterloo
Highfield
Highfield
Squires
SquiresGate
Gate
Highfield
Highfield
Stanley
Stanley
GEOG. BARRIERS:
Road distance to a GP (A);
supermarket or convenience store (B);
primary school (C);
Post Office (D)
WIDER BARRIERS:
Overcrowding (E)
Housing affordability (F)
Homelessness (G)
Squires
SquiresGate
Gate
Stanley
Stanley
Recorded crime rates for the following composite
indicators:
Burglary (A)
Violence (B)
Theft (C)
Criminal damage (D)
Page 20 of 22
Chapter 1 - Population and Neighbourhoods in Blackpool
Figure 19 - Living Environment domain of IMD 2010 and Change in IMD from 2007-2010
LIVING ENVIRONMENT DOMAIN
Change in IMD 2007-2010
Index of Multiple Deprivation 2010
Change in IMD 2010 Rank
National Decile
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
Anchorsholme
Anchorsholme
Norbreck
Norbreck
0 to 5,280
-240 to
0
-510 to -240
-1,110 to -510
-1,630 to -1,110
-2,860 to -1,630
Anchorsholme
Anchorsholme
Norbreck
Norbreck
Ingthorpe
Ingthorpe
Ingthorpe
Ingthorpe
Bispham
Bispham
Bispham
Bispham
Greenlands
Greenlands
Greenlands
Greenlands
Warbreck
Warbreck
Warbreck
Warbreck
Layton
Layton
Claremont
Claremont
Park
Park
Layton
Layton
Claremont
Claremont
Brunswick
Brunswick
Park
Park
Brunswick
Brunswick
Talbot
Talbot
Talbot
Talbot
Tyldesley
Tyldesley
Tyldesley
Tyldesley
Marton
Marton
Bloomfield
Bloomfield
Marton
Marton
Bloomfield
Bloomfield
Victoria
Victoria
Victoria
Victoria
Clifton
Clifton
Clifton
Clifton
Hawes
Hawes Side
Side
Hawes
Hawes Side
Side
Waterloo
Waterloo
Waterloo
Waterloo
Highfield
Highfield
Squires
SquiresGate
Gate
Highfield
Highfield
Stanley
Stanley
INDOORS LIVING
ENVIRONMENT:
Housing in poor condition (A)
Houses without central heating (B)
OUTDOORS LIVING
ENVIRONMENT:
Air quality (C)
Road traffic accidents (D)
Squires
SquiresGate
Gate
Stanley
Stanley
CHANGE IN INDEX OF MULTIPLE DEPRIVATION RANK
Source: Communities and Local Government
Page 21 of 22
Chapter 1 - Population and Neighbourhoods in Blackpool
Document Control
Document owner:
Stephen Boydell
Document number:
Document category:
JSNA
Document location:
S:\PH INFORMATION\Joint strategic needs assessment JSNA\Core Document
Issued by:
Public Health
Last edited:
19/09/2014
Record of Amendments:
Date
Version
Amended by
Description of changes
Nov 2013
15
Stephen Boydell
Full update
Feb 2014
17
Stephen Boydell
New front cover
Mar 2014
18
Paolo Russo
Figure 12 and Table 4 in chapter 1
update (to include 2012 data)
Apr 2014
19
Stephen Boydell
May 2014
19
Stephen Boydell
Removed acknowledgements
section
Figure 9 updated
July 2014
19
Stephen Boydell
Figure 3 and Figure 11 updated
Sept 2014
19
Stephen Boydell
Figure 1 updated
March 2015
20
Stephen Boydell
Updated MOSAIC section
Approved By:
Name
Title
Signature
JSNA Strategic Group
Date
19/12/2013
Page 22 of 22