1. business and industrial
2. agriculture and forestry
3. agriculture

THE CAADP RESULTS FRAMEWORK
(2015 - 2025)
“Going
“Goingfor
forresults
resultsand
andimpacts”
impacts”
“Sustaining CAADP Momentum”
“Going for results and impacts”
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Preamble .............................................................................................................................................................................................................
2
Acronyms and abbreviations .......................................................................................................................................................................
3
1.
INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................................................................................
4
1.1
Sustaining CAADP momentum ................................................................................................................................
4
1.2
Time for bold decisions and action to deliver results and impacts .............................................................
4
2.
THE CAADP RESULTS FRAMEWORK .........................................................................................................................................
6
2.1 Rationale and scope .....................................................................................................................................................
6
2.2
Structure of the CAADP Results Framework ........................................................................................................
7
3.
USING THE CAADP RESULTS FRAMEWORK ............................................................................................................................
10
3.1
General ..............................................................................................................................................................................
10
3.2
The “Frontline Dashboard” of key change and impacts desired by 2025 .................................................
11
3.3
Using the CAADP Results Framework at country level ....................................................................................
13
3.4
Using the CAADP Results Framework at regional and continental levels ................................................
14
3.5
Monitoring, reporting and capacity development ...........................................................................................
15
3.6
Support to countries: roles, responsibilities and the CAADP Results Framework
reporting architecture ..................................................................................................................................................
4.
5.
15
EXPECTED VALUE ADDITION OF THE CAADP RESULTS FRAMEWORK TO EXISTING REPORTING
TOOLS AND SYSTEMS ....................................................................................................................................................................
17
ANNEXES ............................................................................................................................................................................................
18
ANNEX 1 – Table 1a: Level 1 impact indicators ...................................................................................................................................... 18
ANNEX 1 – Table 1b: Level 2 production and productivity outcome indicators .......................................................................
19
ANNEX 1 – Table 1c: Level 3 systemic capacity indicators ................................................................................................................. 21
© 2015; The CAADP Results Framework (2015-2025); NEPAD Planning and Coordinating Agency
PREAMBLE
The Sustaining CAADP Momentum exercise, undertaken in 2012-13 in order to look back at the 10 years of Comprehensive African
Agriculture Development Programme (CAADP) implementation, concluded that the CAADP vision is just as valid as it was in 2003 and
that significant progress has been made in building systems and capacity for planning, prioritisation and formulation of investment
programmes. CAADP has also mobilised multi-institutional and multi-sectorial interest and commitment to agriculture development.
Looking ahead to the next decade of CAADP implementation, a key challenge is therefore HOW to accelerate implementation with a
view to achieving the CAADP vision and goals.
The first decade of CAADP implementation (2003-2013) was one of self-discovery, innovation and re-establishment. It produced some
critical achievements and lessons, which have enabled Africa to move into the second decade with the conviction and ability to bring
about sustainable CHANGE in African agriculture, and to ensure this change delivers tangible contributions to economic growth and
inclusive development, especially with regard to eliminating hunger and malnutrition, reducing poverty, and making prosperity a
reality for the people of the continent. To respond to the call for results and impacts, the Sustaining CAADP Momentum exercise has
led to the development of the CAADP RESULTS FRAMEWORK. This has brought in a strong element of evidence-based accountability,
learning and improved implementation models, which ensure value for money.
The CAADP Results Framework is an inherent part of CAADP implementation. It will provide all those involved with standard, tangible parameters to benchmark progress in agricultural performance. This will reinforce the culture of results-based programming and
performance monitoring. Use of the results framework will improve the quality of planning and decision making at the continental,
regional and country levels.
The CAADP Results Framework provides Africa and its partners with a solid presentation of the goals and priority actions of the agricultural development agenda. It gives the political and technical impetus to foster alignment in collaboration with partners. It provides indicators with baseline data, as well as targets to be achieved over the next five to ten years. The adoption of the Results Framework will
also compel players and stakeholders at all levels to reflect on and respond to emerging issues, including climate change, globalised
food and energy systems, population growth and urban migration trends in Africa, nutrition, and improvements in governance.
Implementation of the CAADP Results Framework is vital. In this respect, the framework is a “living component” of the efforts to
enhance capacity in order to effectively deliver the desired results and sustainable growth. This is why 2014, which is also the African
Union Year for Agriculture, Food Security and Nutrition, is a crucial part of finalising the development of the CAADP Results Framework
through country and regional grounding, adaptation and putting the framework into operation within existing CAADP implementation processes. For this purpose, the African Union Commission and the NEPAD Agency, in collaboration with the Regional Economic
Communities, places this document in your hands – country players and stakeholders and all those working on or supporting change
in African agriculture – for improved performance.
H.E. Rhoda Peace Tumusiime,
Dr Ibrahim Assane Mayaki,
Commissioner,
Chief Executive Officer,
Rural Economy and Agriculture, African Union Commission
NEPAD Planning and Coordinating Agency
2015
“Going for results and impacts”
2
ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
AfDB AgPER
African Development Bank
Agriculture Public Expenditure Review
APRM
AU
Africa Peer Review Mechanism
African Union
CAADP
CGIAR
Comprehensive African Agriculture Development Programme
International Centre for Agricultural Research
COMESA CSO Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa
Civil society organisation
EC
European Commission
FAO FDI
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Foreign direct investment
GDP
IFAD Gross domestic product
International Fund for Agricultural Development
IFPRI IMF
JSR
3
International Food Policy Research Institute
International Monetary Fund
Joint Sector Review
MDG Millennium Development Goals
M&E
Monitoring and evaluation
MTEF Medium Term Expenditure Framework
NARS NEPAD
National Agricultural Research System
New Partnership for African Development
NEPAD Agency
NEPAD Planning and Coordinating Agency
NGO
NSB
Non-governmental organisation
National Statistical Bureau
ODA
Overseas development assistance
PPP ReSAKSS
Public-private partnership
Regional Strategic Analysis and Knowledge Support System
SACAU
Southern African Confederation of Agricultural Unions
SADC
SLM
S&T
Southern Africa Development Community
Sustainable land management
Science and technology
UNCCD
United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification
UNDP
United Nations Development Programme
USD (US$) United States dollar
© 2015; The CAADP Results Framework (2015-2025); NEPAD Planning and Coordinating Agency
1INTRODUCTION
1.1
SUSTAINING CAADP MOMENTUM
Implementation of CAADP has over the last decade enabled countries to address some of the key transformational issues in agricultural development. Additional to improving the development planning processes, countries are placing growing attention to strengthening and aligning policy design processes, through, for instance, making the policy design processes transparent and inclusive as well as
linked to evidence-based analysis. There is also growing attention and action to strengthen and align institutional and human capacity
to achieve highest levels in planning and implementation efficiency and effectiveness
Looking forward into the next decade, African Union (AU) member states, through the
various Heads of State and Government platforms, have stressed that value addition from
Box 1: The Sustaining CAADP
the Comprehensive Africa Agricultural Development Programme (CAADP) will be required
Momentum exercise provides
mostly in strengthening implementation capacity and delivering desired results and impacts.
resolute confirmation that the
Impacts imply ensuring improved agricultural performance and how this translates into im-
CAADP vision is just as valid and
provements in livelihood parameters, including wealth and job creation, poverty alleviation,
compelling now as it was in 2003
food and nutrition security and, ultimately, the resilience and prosperity of the people of the
continent.
The Sustaining CAADP momentum exercise carried out over several months in 2012-13 using highly consultative and analytical tools
and approaches, examined different levels of CAADP action and experience to identify major achievements and lessons from the first
decade of CAADP. The exercise also took into account changing or emerging issues, such as trends in global food and energy prices
and growing attention to climate change and nutrition. The Sustaining CAADP momentum has further noted that ability, capacity
and mechanism to design and plan programmes and projects, as well as tracking performance are integral and essential parts to the
capacity to deliver results.
The AU Joint Conference of Ministers of Agriculture, Rural Development, Fisheries and Aquaculture, held from 28 April to 2 May 2014
in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, endorsed the Sustaining the CAADP Momentum Results Framework as a key tool for translating Africa’s
agricultural development goals into tangible targets: tracking, monitoring and reporting on progress as well as facilitating mutual
learning and accountability. The Ministers further supported the Results Framework as a tool for: a) fostering alignment and coordination and rallying multi-sectorial efforts towards common goals; b) accompanying further planning and new programmes; c) building
Africa’s capacity for knowledge and data generation and management to support evidence-based planning and implementation; and
d) strengthening multi-institutional platforms for regular peer reviews, mutual learning and mutual accountability. The Ministers committed to an Agricultural Review Process to be conducted every two years, and a mid-term review of the 2015-2025 CAADP key goals
to be conducted after five years.
1.2
TIME FOR BOLD DECISIONS AND ACTION TO DELIVER RESULTS AND IMPACTS
For Africa to accelerate the pace for agriculture transformation, CAADP stakeholders have identified some of the key aspects in terms
of: a) what actions to continued doing; b) what should be stopped; and c) what should be started (new actions), as follows:
“Going for results and impacts”
4
a)
Examples of good things that are happening and should continue to happen, as identified by African stakeholders
include: sustaining their renewed attention to agriculture as a priority sector; increasing investment in the agricultural sector; improving and sustaining an enabling environment for the private sector; mainstreaming gender, youth and nutrition issues into agricultural
programmes; sustaining regional integration efforts; developing and making use of African-owned country-led initiatives to unleash
the continent’s development potential; and continuing to nurture the peer learning culture.
b)
Examples of things Africa should stop doing include: playing beggar in the global food system; selling arable land for fuel
at the expense of agriculture and local people’s livelihoods; paying lip service to agricultural investment instead of acting on pledged
investments; public sector crowding out of other stakeholders; implementing policies that benefit urban consumers at the expense of
rural producers; unsustainable land use and selling land without due diligence; accepting donor financing regardless of the agenda;
and over-dependence on donors for agricultural investments instead of investing national budgets into agriculture for the long-term
sustainability of agricultural development.
c)
Examples of things that are not happening that Africa should start doing include: more aggressive African agribusiness
entrepreneurship on the domestic and global markets; governments should accurately value the natural resources needed for agricultural production, such as land, water and labour; developing policies that promote value addition in agricultural production through
investment in agro-processing technologies, infrastructure and skills; agriculture should be more people-centred and driven; CAADP
should be more about empowering people to unleash their own potential; promoting transparency and accountability at all levels;
reviewing plans annually, monitoring results and factoring in improvements; and increasing awareness about promoting nutrition and
food security.
The CAADP Results Framework will help countries to internalize the drive to identify and address, within local circumstances, the
change “in-the-way-we-do-business” aware that delivering results and impact is a matter of not simply doing more of the same things.
5
© 2015; The CAADP Results Framework (2015-2025); NEPAD Planning and Coordinating Agency
2
THE CAADP RESULTS FRAMEWORK
2.1
RATIONALE AND SCOPE
The CAADP Results Framework is the instrument that establishes expected results and
impacts, and is therefore a guide to developing, planning and implementing investments programme in the 2nd decade of CAADP. It also ensures the tracking, monitoring and ongoing formative evaluation of existing projects and programmes. Moreover,
the CAADP Results Framework is about strengthening national systemic capacity in the
long term for sustainable development (Box 2). The Results Framework provides specific benchmarks and milestones for Africa’s agricultural development agenda as well
as the basis for aligning and harmonizing programmes and initiatives in agriculture.
Box 3: In the CAADP Results
Framework, Africa is setting
priorities and determining what
to continue, what to abandon,
and what to start doing – with a
focus on results and impacts
The CAADP Results Framework will be useful in connecting within and across levels, sectors and thematic areas, as well as for state
and non-state institutions including civil society, private sector organisations and development partners. All of these stakeholders
will find the Results Framework to be a key tool in pursuing results-based planning and implementation. It will provide an important basis for developing effective alliances and partnerships. The Results Framework is an integral part of country CAADP implementation processes, and national level players and stakeholders therefore take central responsibility for its implementation.
At the regional and continental levels, the internalisation
and use of the CAADP Results Framework will be led by
the Regional Economic Communities (RECs), the NEPAD
Planning and Coordinating Agency (NEPAD Agency)
and the African Union Commission (AUC). The Results
Framework also provides key parameters and scope to
enhance collaboration and partnerships with local and
international partners. ODA and FDI partnerships, as well
as bilateral and multilateral initiatives such as the New
Alliance for Food Security, Grow Africa and GAFSP, should
align with the CAADP Results Framework
Box 4: Through CAADP, there has been greater appreciation of
multi-sectorial aspects and cross-sectorial interdependences
in African agriculture, and practical ways of dealing with these
aspects have been identified. To deliver set agricultural performance goals and targets during the second decade of CAADP,
it is clear that the following policy and change strategies and
progress will be the key to success in agriculture:
- progress in industrialisation, especially with regard
to agriculture-based value addition industry
- functioning regional markets playing a key part as
optimal drivers of national agricultural and economic
The CAADP Results Framework is an integral
part of the AU Agenda 2063 and is designed to help
define the agricultural “space” in that Agenda. It indicates
growth
- increased purpose-built capacity (quality and quan
the level and rate of agricultural performance and the
tity) for innovation, S&T and skills development
policy, strategy, and capacity development actions that
are required for the sector to contribute to achieving the 2063 Agenda goals. The Framework is particularly important for the continent’s broad-based economic growth and inclusive development aspirations.
“Going for results and impacts”
6
The CAADP Results Framework helps countries to internalise and drive these issues and to change “the way we do business”. Some of
these bold actions will be embedded in sectorial and thematic programmes of action. In the next decade, for instance, the burning
thematic issues include: women and youth; nutrition and agriculture; food systems and value chains; climate change and sustainable land and water management; and inclusive development. It is also recognised that decentralised decision making processes that
empower actors from sub-national right down to community levels will be key to ensuring the impact of agricultural growth reaches
wider and local communities, including smallholder farmers. In the agricultural sector, this will be pursued under Level 3 (in the Results
Framework) - institutional capacity development.
2.2
STRUCTURE OF THE CAADP RESULTS FRAMEWORK
The Results Framework is relevant and applicable primarily at country level for the preparation and implementation of the second
decade of CAADP (2015-2025). The issues, priorities and strategies that define the CAADP Results Framework are characterised by four
main aspects, namely (a) the compelling desired at all level to see tangible results and impact from agriculture on the socio-economic
wellbeing of the continent’s populations, especially women and youth and rural communities; (b) need to pursue a two-pronged approach which interactively facilitate interventions on systems and capacity transformation, on one hand, and enhanced productivity
and value addition, on the other; and (c) deliberate orientation towards strategies and approaches for capacity development including
human capital development, science and technology and institutional development and (d) need to bring to the fore a regional integration (trade and markets) agenda as an integral and essential component to sustainable national level solutions.
In this context, the CAADP Results Framework (see Figure 1) combines a logical flow of three levels of results setting out the WHY (Level
1), WHAT (Level 2)and HOW (level 3) of consolidating and stepping up CAADP implementation.
Level 1: Summarises top-level results aimed at achieving real social and economic change in the continent. This level highlight higher
level socio-economic growth and inclusive development goals, namely (a) wealth creation and (b) poverty alleviation; (c) improved
food and nutrition security; (d) improvements in reach and quality of productive safety nets; and (d) ecosystem and social system
resilience. Related indicators as well as continental level targets are elaborated in Tables 2 to 4. It is the significance of agricultural
contribution to these result areas which will demonstrate the phrase “agriculture-led growth and development”. Improved agricultural
performance is expected to contribute to achieving these goals, while recognising that other sectors of the economy also contribute
to these goals.
Level 2: concerns the intermediate-level results required in terms of agricultural productivity and competitiveness and inclusive
growth. It describe changes that would lead to the desired level of agricultural performance, both in terms of production, productivity,
competitiveness and regional integration, as well as effectiveness and efficiency in all related production systems. This also means that
it is the success and improved performances in the priority areas identified in this level which will determine agricultural contribution
to Level 1 results and impacts.
Level 3 results: describes the HOW as a combination of various capabilities needed to accelerate agricultural growth and to broaden
its impact; it present the key policy, institutional, and capacity outcomes required to trigger the changes in level 2, thereby helping to
achieve level 1 goals. It is at this level that CAADP implementation over the next 10 years is expected to make the strongest contribution.
7
© 2015; The CAADP Results Framework (2015-2025); NEPAD Planning and Coordinating Agency
The three levels, together, reflect a Pan-African framework for transformational change, policy reforms and institutional
development. The set of specific, common and measurable indicators listed in Tables in Annex 1 allows country and
regional implementation entities, relevant stakeholders and their partners to individually and collectively rationalise and assess alignment of agricultural policy and strategic priorities and to monitor programme performance and progress in an evidence-based and
transparent manner.
The Results Framework therefore serves as the “visionary beacon”. At continental level, the CAADP Results Framework clarifies a collective vision and shared standards of practice, which are to be translated at the national and regional levels into localised priorities,
goals and targets. The CAADP Results Framework serves as a set of benchmarks against which national and regional level efforts will be
pitched, by way of using the Results Framework as a guide to set targets, identify actions and define indicators when (a) initiating planning of policies, strategies, programmes and budgets, and b) measuring performance in terms of efficiency of execution, effectiveness
of implementation and achievement of outcomes.
The overarching CAADP Results Framework is designed to provide guidance at the level of: a) planning (strategy, programme design
and budgeting); b) performance (“efficiency” in execution and implementation, largely accounting for change in agriculture policies
and institutions, and strengthening and aligning capacity); and c) results (referring to the actual outcomes and impacts of a development intervention, including goods, services and value addition underpinned by increases in agriculture production, productivity,
food and nutrition).
Figure 1: CAADP 2015-2025 Results Framework
Figure 1: CAADP 2015-2025 Results Framework
Impact to which
CAADP
contributes
(indirect link)
Level 1 – Contribution of agriculture to economic growth and inclusive development
Economic opportunities and
prosperity – jobs and
poverty alleviation
Increased contribution to
wealth creation
Improved food security and
nutrition for all
Increased access to
productive safety nets
Increased ecosystem
resilience and sustainability
Assumption: Countries follow an agriculture-led, inclusive growth strategy for social and economic change.
Level 2 – Agricultural change and sustained inclusive agricultural growth
Changes in African
agriculture
resulting from
CAADP
implementation
Main assumptions: Systemic capacity for transforming agriculture as envisaged in Level 3 results is attained
2.1 Increased agricultural
production and productivity
2.2 Increased intra-Africa
regional trade and better
functioning national and
regional agriculture and food
markets
2.3 Expanded domestic
agro-industry and value
chain development
2.4 Improved governance
and management of natural
resources for sustainable
agricultural production
Level 3 – Strengthening systemic capacity for effective execution and delivery of results
(Conducive policy environment; systemic capacity development; improved technologies and access to knowledge and information)
Added value of
CAADP support
and interventions
to institutional
change and
CAADP
operational
effectiveness
measured at this
level
Assumptions: Leadership ensures a conducive and stable policy environment, including a sustained increase in agricultural investments
3.1 Effective and
inclusive policy
design,
implementation
and evaluation
capacity (policy
practice)
3.2 Effective and
accountable
institutions including
human capital
development
3.3 Strengthened
capacity for
evidence-based
programme
planning,
implementation
and review
3.4 Improved multisectorial
coordination,
partnerships and
accountability in the
agricultural
institutions
3.5 Increased public
and private
investments in
agriculture
3.6 Increased capacity
to generate, analyse
and use data,
information and
knowledge including
monitoring
performance, research
and innovations in
agriculture
CAADP INPUTS: IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES; KNOWLEDGE POOLS; CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT, PEER REVIEW MECHANISMS
“Going for results and impacts”
8
Table 1 provides a detailed explanation of the three levels and their interrelationships.
Table 1: Summary of the Results levels and general description
Results level
Level 1: WHY? (IMPACTS)
Defines ultimate IMPACTS in terms of socio-economic
and food and nutrition transformation changes in African
society.
These are high-level results reflecting medium- to longterm changes in inclusive prosperity and ecosystem
resilience.
These IMPACT levels are not wholly attributed to
agriculture; moreover, most of the contributions of
agriculture are indirect. The question, therefore, is to
what extent and at what rate agriculture is contributing
to achieving these impacts.
Level 2: WHAT? (OUTCOMES)
Defines results in terms of agricultural production,
productivity, competitiveness and regional and global
integration.
Identifies the intended (priority) agriculture-specific
results (outcomes) that in turn contribute to IMPACTS
(Level 1).
Defines the goals of agricultural interventions.
Defines goals in terms of food systems and nutrition
outcomes.
Level 3: HOW?
Defines results in terms of systemic capacities to
effectively finance and implement agricultural policies
and programmes at the national level, including the
mainstreaming of nutrition.
This level also defines the priority results areas that
constitute “CAADP implementation support”.
Sets out the CAADP-specific results areas through
implementation, implementation support, and
interventions at the national, regional and continental
levels.
CAADP implementation support will pursue results in the
six results areas defined for this level. This can also be
interpreted as the CAADP-specific value addition to
agricultural change and improved performance.
Achieving the results in these seven areas will enable
countries to strengthen and align planning and
implementation capacity, i.e. improving the execution
and delivery (effectiveness, efficiency and
appropriateness) of results. It will also strengthen the
enabling environment (especially with regard to policies).
9
Description
Adapting and achieving Level 1 and Level 2 targets are
the responsibility of national and regional level
institutions. Achievement of Level 1 and Level 2 targets
by countries will indicate progress made in
strengthening the regional and international
competitiveness of African agriculture and its overall
impact on the continent’s socio-economic growth,
development, food systems and nutrition.
This directly concerns AGRICULTURAL SECTOR CHANGE
and PERFORMANCE.
The targets in Levels 1 and 2 are meant to serve as
continental level benchmarks. The issues involved
reflect priority areas and overarching principles and
values that also make defining and implementing transboundary and regional programmes a feasible and
viable option. Countries will use these targets in
benchmarking the setting and evaluation of national
level goals and targets
CAADP implementation support will provide technical
guidance including historical and foresight analysis to
help countries determine feasible country-specific
growth levels and rates (financing, implementation,
etc.) to achieve the visionary targets in the time given.
Level 3 defines organisational and human ABILITY and
CAPACITY to plan and execute agricultural development
policies and programmes at the national level. Level 3
defines the interventions and results areas specific to
CAADP implementation support; CAADP
implementation will address one or a combination of
results areas defined in Level 3.
Delivering on the six results areas identified for this
level will enable and empower countries to achieve
appropriate, effective and efficient performance in the
agricultural sector (i.e. Level 2) and will thereby
contribute to impact issues (Level 1)
© 2015; The CAADP Results Framework (2015-2025); NEPAD Planning and Coordinating Agency
3. USING THE CAADP RESULTS FRAMEWORK
3.1GENERAL
3.
USING THE CAADP RESULTS FRAMEWORK
3.1 Framework
GENERALis an integral part of country CAADP implementation. Implementing the Framework therefore imThe CAADP Results
plies integrating
its CAADP
featuresResults
and principles
intoisCAADP
implementation
exercises
and
processes at allImplementing
levels. In this way,
The
Framework
an integral
part of country
CAADP
implementation.
the the Results
Framework helps
to catalyse,
provideimplies
for, encourage
anditsfacilitate:
Framework
therefore
integrating
features and principles into CAADP implementation exercises
and processes at all levels. In this way, the Results Framework helps to catalyse, provide for, encourage
and facilitate:
•
Formulation and design of strategies, programmes, and investments;
•
•
•
Objectivity
and clarityand
of purpose
monitoring
performance
and
results;
• Formulation
design ofinstrategies,
programmes,
and
investments;
• and
Objectivity
and claritysystem
of purpose
in monitoring
performance and results;
A sound
evidence-based
to pursue
accountability;
•
A
sound
and
evidence-based
system
to
pursue
accountability;
Alignment and harmonisation, which enhance coherence in development efforts.
• Alignment and harmonisation, which enhance coherence in development efforts.
The CAADP RF as an
integral part of
programme design and
monitoring of execution
and delivery
Integrating the
CAADP RF
Integrating the CAADP
RF
Figure 2: Entry points for the Results Framework in the country CAADP implementation process
At the regional and continental levels, the CAADP Results Framework will, within the principle of
At the regionalsubsidiarity,
and continental
the organise
CAADP Results
Framework
will, within
the principle
of subsidiarity,
help to better organise
help levels,
to better
implementation
support
and ensure
the relevance
and effectiveness
implementation
and ensure
the relevance
andwill
effectiveness
this support.
The Results
Framework
will also foster regional
ofsupport
this support.
The Results
Framework
also foster of
regional
and continental
agricultural
development
policies,
strategies
and
programmes
that
support
optimal
national
solutions.
The
Results
Framework
is The Results
and continental agricultural development policies, strategies and programmes that support optimal national solutions.
applicable to all institutions, programmes and projects working on and supporting agricultural
Framework is applicable to all institutions, programmes and projects working on and supporting agricultural development initiadevelopment initiatives, from state through to non-state programmes and efforts. Once again, the Results
tives, from stateFramework
through tocan
non-state
and
Once
again, the
be used both
ex-ante, in
be usedprogrammes
both ex-ante,
in efforts.
preparing
strategies
andResults
plans, Framework
and ex-post,can
in developing
M&E
and
other
tools
to
measure
and
enhance
performance.
preparing strategies and plans, and ex-post, in developing M&E and other tools to measure and enhance performance.
As with the CAADP vision, the four thematic priorities defined in the CAADP, commonly referred to as the
CAADP pillars, are just as relevant and valid now as they were in the circumstances leading up to 2003.
The CAADP pillar issues form the central thread of the CAADP Results Framework and therefore remain
“Going for results and impacts”11
10
As with the CAADP vision, the four thematic priorities defined in the CAADP, commonly referred to as the CAADP pillars, are just as relevant and valid now as they were in the circumstances leading up to 2003. The CAADP pillar issues form the central thread of the CAADP
Results Framework and therefore remain the “pillars” that guide and support efforts to deliver increased production and productivity.
The Sustaining CAADP Momentum Results Framework expands on the four CAADP pillars across the three levels of the Results Framework. Pillar 1 focuses on land and water management, with results that are largely captured at Level 2 in relation to production, productivity and improved management of natural resources. Pillar 2 places the emphasis on market access, and has relevant results that
are also captured at Level 2. The focus in Pillar 3 on food security, nutrition and social protection relates to key Level 1 results, which
now include wealth creation and resilience. Pillar 4 is basically about effective science and technology systems, and is one of several
thrusts required for sustainable and systemic capacities for the effective delivery of results in Level 3.
3.2
THE “FRONTLINE DASHBOARD” OF KEY CHANGE AND IMPACTS DESIRED BY 2025
The dashboard comprises a small set of composite indicators that enable higher level monitoring of progress and performance at both
political and technical levels. Dashboard indicators provide a smaller set of data that show the status of a country, region or continent,
and can therefore be used for more regular management reporting purposes, such as cabinet meetings, ministerial meetings, the AU
Summit and other annual accountability reports. In this regard, at the AU Joint Conference of Ministers of Agriculture, Rural Development, Fisheries and Aquaculture held from 28 April to 2 May 2014 in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, Ministers were convinced that if there is
the political will to do so, hunger can be eliminated by 2025. Factors that define political will were identified as: i) adequate budget
allocation combined with appropriate policies and plans to ensure efficient and effective use of allocations; ii) inter-sectorial coordination, given the interconnections between agriculture and other sectors; iii) partnership alignment/coordination; iv) access to land,
credit and other inputs; v) programmes to bring youth and women into agriculture; vi) technical innovations that are relevant and accessible to smallholder producers; vii) knowledge sharing; viii) dealing with corruption at border posts; and ix) a critical mass of trained
human resources. Member States agreed to closely monitor progress on the four dimensions as a way to gauge the extent to which
stated commitments to support agriculture are being put into operation. On this basis, the ministers resolved to:
a) At least double the rate of inclusive growth in agricultural production and productivity, and to maintain annual sector growth
in agricultural GDP at a minimum of 6%. Ministers resolved to put in place measures and mechanisms for ensuring equal access to
opportunities including land, productive assets, knowledge, information and skills for women, youth, pastoral groups and other
socially disadvantaged groups
b) Endorse the Science Agenda for Agriculture in Africa (S3A) to increase the level of ATFP annual growth through technology
generation, dissemination and adoption, and skilled human resources
c) Endorse the Guiding Principles on Large-Scale Land-Based Investments (LSLBI) in Africa, prepared by the Joint AUC-AfDB- ECA Land
Policy Initiative, which is aimed at helping Member States to derive optimum benefits from such investments
d) Triple Intra-African Trade, fast-track the establishment of the Continental Free Trade Area (CFTA) and the transition to a
continental Common External Tariff (CET) scheme.
11
© 2015; The CAADP Results Framework (2015-2025); NEPAD Planning and Coordinating Agency
The AU Joint Conference of Ministers of Agriculture, Rural Development, Fisheries and Aquaculture endorsed the Sustaining the
CAADP Momentum Results Framework and resolved to recommend that the AU Assembly should endorse the following commitments
on the Africa Accelerated Agricultural Growth and Transformation Goals to be achieved by 2025 (3AGTGs 2025). These targets therefore
form the Dashboard Headline Indicators for governments, Heads of States, African institutions and stakeholders, and development
partners:
I.
Commitment to the principles and values of the CAADP process
a)
Participatory and evidence-based policy practice and planning
b)
Effective partnerships between state and non-state actors
c)
Commitment to assess country CAADP M&E and mutual accountability processes every two years
II.
Commitment to enhancing investment financing in agriculture
a)
Re-commitment to allocate at least 10% of public spending to agriculture
b)
Create necessary conditions to attract increased private sector investments in agriculture
III.
Commitment to ending hunger in Africa
a)
Increased food availability by:
• At least, double productivity, through among other interventions, increased access to inputs, irrigation and mechanisation
• At least double the current level of annual growth in agricultural total factor productivity
• At least halve post-harvest losses (PHL)
b)
Improve nutrition by bring down stunting in children to 10% and underweight to 5%
IV.
Commitment that agriculture contributes at least 50% to Africa’s overall poverty reduction target
a)
Sustain annual agricultural GDP growth of at least 6%
b)
Create job opportunities for at least 30% of youth in agricultural value chains
c)
Increased number of women and youth entering accessing agri-business economic opportunities
V.
Commitment to boost intra-African trade in agricultural commodities and services
a)
Triple intra-Africa trade in agricultural commodities and services
VI.
Commitment to enhancing resilience in livelihoods and production systems to climate variability and other related
risks
a)
At least 30% of farming/pastoral households are resilient to climate and weather relates risks
VII.
Commitment to the CAADP Results Framework and to an agricultural review process to be conducted every
two years.
By their nature, these indicators are composite and will be desegregated for monitoring and analysis.
“Going for results and impacts”
12
3.3
USING THE CAADP RESULTS FRAMEWORK AT COUNTRY LEVEL
3.3.1
National level actions to internalise and use the CAADP 10-Year Results Framework
The CAADP Results Framework has been designed recognising that various tools and processes exist at the national level for monitoring and evaluating agricultural progress and performance. Furthermore, many countries are moving on with their National Agriculture
and Food Security Investment Plans (NAIPs). The CAADP Results Framework is expected to function as an integral part of these existing
systems and tools. Using the CAADP Results Framework will inherently involve strengthening and aligning these systems and tools
into systemic evidence-based accountability and capability in agriculture, including the linkages between agriculture, food systems
and nutrition. As already suggested, each CAADP country team will need to strengthen or develop a results framework for their NAIP.
In the next decade, the priority will be mobilising private sector investment, associated catalytic public sector finance, and requisite
institutional and policy developments. The ex-ante applications of the country Results Framework include consolidating and clarifying
implementation aspects of the investment plans with theory of change analysis and political economy analysis. Ex-post applications
are in strengthening M&E and performance management tools. The continental Results Framework and national Results Framework
feed into one another as living documents. Specifically, the CAADP Results Framework will serve as a guide and tool to:
•
Examine and align goals and targets (results and impacts) and associated performance indicators in the NAIPs;
•
Help countries to refine and focus NAIPs set performance targets;
•
Rally unity of purpose around a common national agenda and deliverables;
•
Examine, refine, strengthen and align existing national level tools and systems for monitoring, evaluating and facilitating
learning and for strengthening accountability.
This is not a re-planning exercise, but an integral part of fostering and consolidating implementation of the NAIPs in the
following aspects:
a)
With regard to Level 1: Positioning agriculture in overall national social and economic growth, and the (inclusive) devel
opment trajectory – i.e. agriculture-led social and economic development.
b)
With regard to Level 2: Determining what level of performance is desirable and required to achieve the growth rate
needed to contribute appropriately to Level 1.
c)
With regard to Level 3: Expressing the transformational change with requisite theory of change analyses essentially in
terms of systematic capabilities, action and policy reforms in order to unlock the potential of commercial agriculture.
Incorporating the following components will strengthen the Implementation Plan:
•
Specific policy and institutional reforms needed to address particular problems/opportunities
•
Financial analyses of investments that are separate from economic analyses
13
© 2015; The CAADP Results Framework (2015-2025); NEPAD Planning and Coordinating Agency
•
A NAIP Results Framework to guide implementation and performance management.
The functioning and use of the CAADP Results Framework will be defined around four main interrelated components, namely: (a) data
generation, which will also cover alignment and harmonisation of the indicators; (b) analysis, evaluation and learning; (c) reporting;
and (d) support for new planning and for accountability discussions and analysis. Implementation should therefore be integrated into
national statistics and agricultural performance monitoring systems, for instance:
a.
Preparing, reviewing and rolling over NAIPs;
b.
Designing strategies/programmes for implementation;
c.
Establishing partnerships and coalitions for action;
d.
Mobilising resources and structuring investment deals;
e.
Monitoring and evaluating, assessing, learning from practice;
f.
Adapting and re-planning for the next cycle.
3.3.2
The CAADP Results Framework in relation to existing national agriculture accountability and performance review systems
Within the context of NAIP implementation, key national tools and processes that are expected to provide the core basis for
implementation of the CAADP Results Framework include:
•
The Agriculture Public Expenditure Review (AgPER) and the Joint Sector Review (JSR);
•
National budget and associated instruments;
•
Agricultural performance monitoring systems;
•
The CAADP M&E and Mutual Accountability Framework;
•
The Africa Peer Review Mechanism (APRM) review process and report, and the APRM National Programmes of Action
(NPoAs) designed to implement APRM recommendations.
3.4
USING THE CAADP RESULTS FRAMEWORK AT THE REGIONAL AND CONTINENTAL LEVELS
At the regional and continental levels, under the leadership of the Regional Economic Communities (RECs), the NEPAD
Planning and Coordinating Agency (NEPAD Agency) and the African Union Commission (AUC) and their cooperating partners, the
CAADP Results Framework will:
a) Provide priority areas, targets and indicators that define “CAADP implementation support” at Level 3 in the Results Framework;
b) Serve as the central “yardstick” to standardise and benchmark as well as facilitate, guide and compel alignment and har
monisation of strategies and programmes by all players and stakeholders, including regional farmers’ organisations, the
private sector, civil society, knowledge-research institutions and multilateral and donor partners. Reporting will include the
“Going for results and impacts”
14
annual CAADP Outlook Report, currently prepared through ReSAKSS, and will rationalise various technical reports on CAADP and African agriculture, including the CAADP Trends and Outlook Report.
Tables 3.1 to 3.6 provide results areas that will be tracked through monitoring systems and tools. The Results Framework will also provide
alignment and performance guidance for various initiatives, including:
• Africa’s international agricultural development initiatives: partnerships and alliances, such as Grow Africa, New Alliance and
CGIAR Initiatives, the Global Agriculture and Food Security Program (GAFSP), Scaling Up Nutrition (SUN), and REACH, etc.
• A Science Agenda for Agriculture in Africa: CAADP investments at the regional and continental levels (e.g. CAADP Knowl edge and
Information Support (KIS) Systems, ReSAKSS, tertiary and vocational training initiatives) will have their Results Frameworks and M&E
tools based on the CAADP continental Results Framework. It is expected that the Science Agenda for Agriculture in Africa (S3A) effort
will help and guide countries to review the priorities and plans in agriculture research
• Land policy and governance: The country NAIPs and associated investments may have to address land issues in more depth in terms of
strengthening land rights in accordance with the AU Framework and Guidelines, the AU Principles and Guidelines for Large-Scale
Land-Based Investments, and the voluntary guidelines for responsible large-scale investments.
3.5
MONITORING, REPORTING AND CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT
Many of these M&E systems exist in one form or another at the national level. However, in most countries these aspects are grossly
under-capacitated, fragmented, under-funded and often not aligned to providing long-term comprehensive monitoring and analysis.
At the regional level, the CAADP Results Framework will enhance and guide the Regional Economic Communities’ reports to Member
States through the Council of Ministers Meetings and Regional Heads of State and Government Summits. At the continental level, reporting will include alignment of the current Annual Trend and Outlook Report (ATOR), which is produced under the auspices of IFPRI
(ReSAKSS). The first consolidated technical Continental Annual Report based on this CAADP Results Framework will be produced at the
end of 2015. Various technical and political platforms and forums will be an integral part of the reporting and accountability system.
These include the African Union Heads of State and Government Summit, the NEPAD Heads of State and Government Orientation
Committee, the CAADP Partnership Platform Meetings, and farmer and other non-state organised forums.
3.6
SUPPORT TO COUNTRIES: ROLES, RESPONSIBILITIES AND THE CAADP RESULTS
FRAMEWORK REPORTING ARCHITECTURE
Effective implementation of the Results Framework at the national, regional, continental and global levels calls for action by several
groups of actors. It thus requires a roadmap that ensures inclusiveness, clarity of roles and a shared understanding of key tasks and
outputs, all for the sake of coherence, consistency and coordination. This section therefore outlines roles and responsibilities at the
15
© 2015; The CAADP Results Framework (2015-2025); NEPAD Planning and Coordinating Agency
continental, regional and country levels and describes how the different actors can contribute to achieving impacts, outcomes and
results associated with the RF. More specifically, the purpose of the roadmap is to guide the AUC and the NPCA in their roles as facilitators and coordinators, the RECs in mobilising and supporting their member states, and national governments and their civil society
and private sector partners in fostering collective action and mutual accountability.
3.6.1
The Role of the AUC and the NPCA in RF implementation
The AUC will, as per its mandate, convene the policy platforms and processes to facilitate continental level dialogue and policy decisions. It will foster appropriate inputs into these platforms and processes based on products from the NPCA and RECs. It will facilitate
desired continental political leadership and action to adopt the CAADP principles in general, and accountability in particular, as desired for implementation of the CAADP Results Framework.
The NPCA, as an implementation agency of the African Union, will facilitate expert technical support to member states and RECs to
help them to internalise and use the CAADP Results Framework to guide the development of country-/region-specific targets and
indicators. The NPCA will facilitate coordination in the implementation of the Framework at all levels.
The NPCA will use the CAADP Results Framework to guide work on the Joint Sector Reviews (JSR) at the national level. The CAADP
Results Framework will also serve as a guide for the report on CAADP implementation for Ministerial meetings and Heads of State and
Government Summits.
3.6.2
The role of the Regional Economic Communities (RECs)
Within the context of fostering regional and transnational collaboration and partnerships (technical, financial, markets, trade), the RECs
will adopt and use the CAADP results framework in benchmarking goals and targets and identifying and programming regional integration priorities and goals. The RECs will internalise and own the Results Framework as a means of enhancing their own programming
and implementation performance as well as promoting peer review, benchmarking, and mutual learning processes in their member
states.
“Going for results and impacts”
16
4.
4
EXPECTED VALUE ADDITION OF THE CAADP RESULTS FRAMEWORK TO
EXISTING REPORTING TOOLS AND SYSTEMS
EXPECTED VALUE ADDITION OF THE CAADP RESULTS FRAME
The implementation
of the CAADP Results Framework requires the transition of participating institutions
WORK
TO EXISTING
from current to new reporting landscapes (see Table 2). The Inception Phase (2014-2015) includes, as one
of its main
work
streams,
actions
to determine
reporting
systems and
The
The implementation
of the
CAADP
Results
Framework
requiresappropriate
the transitionreports,
of participating
institutions
fromplatforms.
current to new
expected (see
value
addition
a refined
set ofincludes,
targets; as
b)one
a rationalised
set of
indicators
targeting,
reporting landscapes
Table
2). Theincludes:
Inceptiona)
Phase
(2014-2015)
of its main work
streams,
actions
to determine
among others, Ministries of Finance, Agriculture and Health; and facilitated evidence-based and objective
accountability systems.
appropriate reports, reporting systems and platforms. The expected value addition includes: a) a refined set of targets; b) a rationalised
set of indicators targeting, among others, Ministries of Finance, Agriculture and Health; and facilitated evidence-based and objective
accountability
systems.
Table
2: Transitions
National
level
from current to new reporting landscapes for CAADP
Current reporting landscape
(before Results Framework)
 Various government and non-government
technical reports on agricultural development
(internal and external)
 AgPERs
 Ministry of Finance economic performance
reports and budgets
 Periodic National Development Assessment
Reports (job creation, poverty alleviation; food
security; etc.)
 CAADP Implementation Support Report
produced by the REC Secretariat and submitted
to the Regional Council of Ministers Meetings
Regional
level
 CAADP Annual Outlook and Trends Report
(currently produced annually under the auspices
of IFPRI)
Continental
level
 Numerous reports on African agriculture
(thematic, geographical, etc.) normally produced
independently by various African and
international organisations, including World Bank,
FAO and NGOs
 Commentaries and opinion pieces (most often
very limited in scope and information)
New reporting landscape
(with Results Framework)
 Same reports, rationalised in terms of which
parameters are monitored, and incorporating
more standardised use of indicators
 CAADP Implementation Support Report
produced by the REC Secretariat and submitted
to the Regional Council of Ministers Meetings –
with reporting parameters aligned to Levels 1, 2
and 3 of the CAADP Results Framework
 Thematic analytical pieces on issues of regional
interest (historical and/or foresight analysis) as
input to high-profile dialogue and policy debate
processes
 CAADP and African Agriculture Annual Report:
Progress and Impact
- Part 1: Results-based CAADP Implementation
Support Report (focusing on Level 3
parameters in the Results Framework)
- Part 2: Agriculture and Africa’s socioeconomic growth and development (focusing
on Level 1 and 2 parameters), including
available nutrition related indictors
 Thematic analytical pieces (historical and/or
foresight analysis) - as input to high profile
dialogue and policy debate processes
Table 2: Transitions from current to new reporting landscapes for CAADP
Through various reports, progress against Results Framework indicators will be reviewed and examined,
and learning will be facilitated at the annual CAADP Partnership Platform. Various reports will be adapted
to feed into national, regional and continental bodies, including the Regional Ministers and Heads of State
and Government Meetings, the NEPAD Heads of State and Government Orientation Committee (HSGOC),
and the African Union Heads of State and Government Summits.
17
© 2015; The CAADP Results Framework (2015-2025); NEPAD Planning and Coordinating Agency
Through various reports, progress against Results Framework indicators will be reviewed and examined, and learning will be facilitated
at the annual CAADP Partnership Platform. Various reports will be adapted to feed into national, regional and
continental bodies, including the Regional Ministers and Heads of State and Government Meetings, the NEPAD Heads of State and
Government Orientation Committee (HSGOC), and the African Union Heads of State and Government Summits.
5.ANNEXES
5.
ANNEXES
ANNEX 1 – Table 1a: Level 1 impact indicators
ANNEX 1 – Table 1a: Level 1 impact indicators
LEVEL 1 – DEVELOPMENT IMPACT – Contribute to Africa’s social and economic development
Results area
1.1 Wealth and Job
creation
Indicators
Data sources
2015 baseline
1.1.1
Change in the poverty gap ratio
(%) at $1/day PPP (PGR)
(disaggregated by gender)
World Bank1, UNSTATS Millennium
Development Goals Indicators2
Poverty line of US$38 and a SSA
regional poverty gap of 20.95%
(World Bank; 2010)
1.1.2
Agricultural GDP share of GDP
World Bank
13.67 (2012)
1.1.3
Number of youth entering
agricultural generated jobs
1.2.1
Change in the Global Hunger Index
FAO, WHO, UNICEF, WFP
1.2.2
Prevalence of underweight
children under five years
World Bank, UNSD, FAO, WHO
1.2.3
Dietary diversity
IFPRI; FAO; WHO
1.3 Enhancing resilience in 1.3.1
livelihoods and
production systems to
climate variability and
other related risks
Existence of functional systems at
country level to help communities
and households to respond to and
bounce back after stresses and
shocks
IFPRI3, EM-DAT
1.4 Environmental and
ecosystem resilience
Change in biological diversity:
trends in abundance and
distribution of species; genetic
diversity of animals, plants and
fish species
UN Convention on Biological
Diversity Indicators4, 2012;
Milestone (@5
years)
Target (10 years)
Malabo Commitment IV:
Agriculture contribute at least
50% to the overall poverty
reduction targets
 Sustain annual agricultural GDP
growth of at least 6%
1.2 Food and nutrition
security
1.4.1
 Create job opportunities for at
least 30% of the youth in
agricultural value chains
19.43 (2012)
Malabo Commitment III: End
hunger in Africa by 2025
 Stunting down to 10%
 Children underweight down to
5%
Malabo Commitment VI: At
least 30% of farming/pastoral
households are resilient to
climate and weather related
risks
1
See: http://iresearch.worldbank.org/PovcalNet/index.htm
See: UNSTATS Millennium Development Goals Indicators
See 2013 GHI Report: http://www.ifpri.org/sites/default/files/publications/ghi13.pdf page 20.
4
See: http://www.cbd.int/doc/?meeting=AHTEG-SP-IND-01
2
3
“Going for results and impacts”
18
ANNEX 1 – Table 1b: Level 2 production and productivity outcome indicators
ANNEX 1 – Table 1b: Level 2 production and productivity outcome indicators
LEVEL 2 – OUTCOME – Sustained inclusive agricultural growth
Results area
Indicators
2.1 Increased agricultural
production and
productivity
2.2 Increased intraAfrican Regional
Trade and better
functioning national
and regional
agriculture and food
markets
Data source
2.1.1 Agricultural value added per
Published annually by the World
Bank for each country
2.1.2 Cereals yields per hectare
World Bank, 2012
2.1.3 Food production index
FAOSTAT5, FAO6, World Development
Indicators /Nation Master.com; World
Bank,
hectare
WTO7
2012, from WTO International
Trade Statistics
2.2.2 Africa’s agriculture-based
WTO8
2012, WTO International Trade
Statistics
2.2.3 Level and share of intra-regional
World Bank, World Development
Indicators
intra-regional trade in agricultural
commodities
contribution to global trade
World Bank, World Development
number of employees by gender in Indicators
SMEs engaged in post-harvest
processing and distribution of
agricultural commodities and
services
Statistics available: (a) Employees
in agriculture (% of total
employment); (b) Employers in
agriculture (% total employment)
2.3.1 Change in volume of business and
2012, based on country data
available from the World Bank;
there is no regional aggregation
See: http://faostat3.fao.org/faostat-gateway/go/to/home/E
See: http://www.fao.org/economic/ess/ess-fs/ess-fadata/en/#.U6GJVfmSw8g
See: http://www.wto.org/english/res_e/statis_e/tradebyregion_e.htm
8
See: http://www.wto.org/english/res_e/statis_e/tradebyregion_e.htm
5
6
7
20
19
Milestone (@5
years)
Target (10 years)
1520.93
2.2.1 Growth in the volume and share of
trade in key commodities
2.3 Expanded domestic
agro-industry and
value chain
development
Baseline
© 2015; The CAADP Results Framework (2015-2025); NEPAD Planning and Coordinating Agency
Malabo Commitment V: Triple
intra-African trade in agricultural
commodities/services
Create job opportunities for at least
30% of youth in agricultural value
chains
Results area
Indicators
Data source
2.3.2 Growth in local agricultural value World Bank , 2012
added per worker (could also
consider agricultural value
added as a % of GDP)
Baseline
A 2012 baseline - SSA:
agriculture value added per
worker at 2005 constant prices
is US$765/worker (World Bank)
Milestone (@5
years)
Target (10 years)
Inclusive public-private partnerships
for at least five priority agricultural
commodity value chains with strong
linkages to smallholder agriculture
A 2012 baseline – SSA:
agricultural value added as a %
of GDP from World Bank is
14.4%
2.4 Improved management,
governance and
sustainable use of
natural resources for
agricultural production
2.4.1 Annual increase in area under
sustainable land and water
management
FAO9
Convention on Biological Diversity
2.4.2 Decrease in soil nutrient mining,
i.e.: Average soil erosion in
GLASOD erosion degree, Average
land degradation in GLASOD
erosion degree, Average carbon
content in the topsoil as % of
weight
2.4.3 Reduction of greenhouse
emissions from the agricultural
sector (including forest
degradation)
FAO
Convention on Biological Diversity
2012, baseline values for area of
land in Africa under water
management is 9 million ha/ 5% of
total cultivated area (from FAO10)
200811
See also
FAO, OECD, UNICEF, UNFCCC,
World Bank
FAO (2011) e.g. (N.B. all values
in Gigsgrams):




Burning - Crop residues:
3,568.42
Cultivation of organic soils
7,570.92
Manure left on pasture
221,352.50
Rice cultivation - 26,536.00
2.4.4 Progress towards implementing
voluntary guidelines on
responsible governance of tenure
of land, forests and fisheries
9
See: http://faostat3.fao.org/faostat-gateway/go/to/home/E
See: http://www.fao.org/africa/areas-of-activities/land-water/en/
See: http://faostat3.fao.org/faostat-gateway/go/to/download/E/ES/E
10
11
21
“Going for results and impacts”
20
Results area
Indicators
Data source
2.4.5 Ecosystem capability index (i.e.
Baseline
Milestone (@5
years)
Target (10 years)
Convention on Biological Diversity
measurement of ecosystem
integrity and ecosystem goods and
services)
ANNEX 1 – Table 1c: Level 3 systemic capacity indicators
LEVEL 3 – OUTPUT – Transformational change as a result of CAADP: conducive environments; systemic capacity
Results area
Indicators
Data source
Baseline (2013)
3.1 Effective and inclusive 3.1.1 Existence of operational and
policy design and
inclusive policy review mechanisms
implementation
and dialogue platforms
processes
3.2 Efficient and
accountable
institutions & better
governance of natural
resources, including
land & water
3.2.1 Existence of institutionalised
mechanisms for mutual
accountability and peer review
3.3 Strengthened capacity 3.3.1 Existence of evidence- and resultof evidence-based
agricultural planning,
implementation and
review processes
based plans, programmes and
projects aligned to the country’s
development priorities
3.3.2 Institutionalised M & E mechanism
for the agricultural sector12
3.4 Improved
coordination,
partnerships and
12
3.4.1 Growth in agriculture-related public
private partnership initiatives that
are successfully undertaken
(Must be harmonised and coordinated across all stakeholders)
22
21
© 2015; The CAADP Results Framework (2015-2025); NEPAD Planning and Coordinating Agency
Milestone (5
years)
Target (10 years)
Results area
Indicators
Data source
3.5.1 (Annual) Growth in the share (%) of
public expenditure allocated to
agricultural sector
National Sources, IFPRI 2011, IMF
2012
3.5.2 Growth in domestic private
investment in agriculture and
agribusiness
National Sources, IFPRI 2011, IMF,
WB
3.5.3 Increase in the ease of doing
business in agriculture index13
National Sources, IFPRI 2011, IMF,
WB
3.5.4 Ratio of public agricultural sector
expenditure to agricultural GDP
(returns on investment)
National Sources, IFPRI 2011, IMF
Baseline (2013)
Milestone (5
years)
Target (10 years)
multi-sectorial
approaches in
agriculture
3.5 Increased volume
and quality of public
and private
investment in
agricultural value
chain
3.6 Increased statistical
capacity to generate
data (monitor)
analyse and
strengthen capacity
for research and
innovation in Africa
3.6.1 Existence of functional systems for
generating and managing
agricultural and statistical data and
information
3.6.2 Existence of a functional NARS for
promoting the generation,
dissemination and use of
appropriate technologies and
innovations
3.6.3 Public investment in agricultural
research as a percentage of GDP
from the agricultural sector.
13
Sub-indices include those that measure the cost of compliance, for example.
23
“Going for results and impacts”
Malabo Commitment II:
Allocating at least 10% of annual
public spending to agriculture
NEPAD Planning and Coordinating Agency
P.O Box 1234
Halfway House
Midrand, 1685
Johannesburg
South Africa
Tel: +27 (0) 11 256 3600
www.nepad-caadp.net
www.facebook.com/nepad.caadp
www.twitter.com/nepad_caadp
© 2015; The CAADP Results Framework (2015-2025); NEPAD Planning and Coordinating Agency