A

By DONALD F. GROCE
A
ccording to Jeff Stauffer, vice
president of Stauffer Glove and
Safety, Inc., “We’ve seen the
momentum of specialized work
gloves grow over the past several years.
There is a definite trend away from traditional leather and cotton work gloves
toward gloves that offer specialized protection, better dexterity and better value.”
Stauffer’s own company, a 103-yearold Pennsylvania enterprise that started
as a manufacturer of cotton work gloves,
has witnessed the transition. Under
fourth-generation family ownership, the
company no longer manufactures cotton gloves and is now a distributor of all
kinds of work gloves.
Today’s PPE glove market is filled
with alternatives to traditional leather
and cotton work gloves. Gloves knit of
engineered yarns provide high levels of
cut resistance. Polymer-coated cotton and
nylon knit gloves now meet workforce
needs for more flexible, longer-lasting
gloves. Hi-vis colors, illuminated backs,
ventilated backs, task-specific levels of
coatings and specific sizing all work to
make these gloves the up-and-coming
gloves of choice for construction workers. Not only are these gloves more
resilient and serviceable for more applications than traditional work gloves, they
also have superior barrier properties and
longer lasting coatings.
The technology
The specifics behind this trend to newage gloves lie with technology.
“The technology in these new gloves
provides better protection and yield along
with better fit, lighter weight and taskspecific features,” Stauffer says. He also
says that because it is hard to change
what has been accepted for years and
because there are still some construction
jobs for which leather is a viable choice,
he believes leather will remain a contender.
Some of the chemicals used in leather
glove curing may pose hazards to workers. Chromates, which are known sensitizers and carcinogens, have been used
to cure leathers. These chemicals are not
used in polymer-coated gloves. Most
leather and cotton glove models are manufactured on a “few sizes fit all” basis,
which makes fit a problem.
Manufacturers of polymer-coated
gloves spend millions of dollars annually researching newer and better glove
designs in sizes ranging from extra
small to extra, extra large. Polymer
coatings made from Natural Rubber
Latex (NRL) or the synthetic polymers,
Nitrile, Neoprene, PVC or Polyurethane,
have come into their own in the past
few years. These lighter-weight, ergonomic glove designs allow workers to
keep wearing gloves while performing
tasks that require more accurate feel and
finer dexterity — tasks that yesteryear’s
workers often performed “gloveless.”
In addition, today’s technology produc-
es polymeric gloves with length-of-wear
times two to ten times longer than those
of leather and cotton gloves. Some flatdipped gloves even have an extra layer of
polymer in stress areas such as the thumb
crotch between the thumb and first finger. Polyurethane-coated nylon or HPPE
gloves offer very durable coatings that
are super lightweight and comfortable.
Wear the right glove
Polymer coatings may be engineered
to either absorb or repel oil or to serve
as a barrier to chemicals that may irritate, burn or sensitize skin. Protection
against chemicals is particularly important because some chemicals used on the
worksite may be absorbed into the skin
and may result in long-term chronic toxic
effects from low-level exposure.
For example, caustic wet cement
water can immediately penetrate cotton
and leather gloves. On the other hand, a
fully coated polymer glove offers excellent protection from exposure to caustic
cement water and hexavalent chromium
from Portland cement. This is important
because hexavalent chromium is a potent
skin sensitizer that causes dermatitis and
debilitating chemical sensitization in
workers whose skin is exposed to it.
More than 1.3 million workers in
the construction trade are exposed to
Portland cement and thousands more
to cement dust. Skin conditions in the
masonry industry are 2.5 times the
national average. A study by the EPA
and Johns Hopkins showed a very strong
dose-response relationship for chromate exposure and the development of
lung cancer. Another study by Mancuso
showed that 23.3 percent, or almost
one fourth, of the deaths of workers in
a chromate plant since 1951 were from
lung cancer. In addition, according to The
National Safety Council’s “Injury Facts
2010,” there were nearly 49,000 new skin
diseases or disorders for the construction
industry reported to the Bureau of Labor
Statistics.
Prevent lacerations
According to The National Safety
Council’s “Injury Facts 2010,” its last
survey (2007) lists for the construction
industry 12,530 injuries to the fingers,
7,490 injuries to the hand excluding
fingers and 3,770 injuries to the wrist.
Gloves designed for cut resistance and
oil absorbance are an excellent choice to
reduce injuries from cuts and/or dropping parts. Protection from lacerations
along with enhanced gripping action are
a win-win. High performance fibers such
as HPPE can be made even stronger by
wrapping with stainless steel or fiberglass
yarn for the highest cut resistance available. Sponge and foam Nitrile coatings
offer the advantage of adding high durability to cut-resistant liners that could be
worn out quickly in handling concrete
blocks or bricks.
It should be noted that there is no cutresistant glove that works for moving or
serrated blades.
With new developments in glove technology, lack of dexterity or cumbersomeness can be a thing of the past. Reduction
of hand injuries in the construction
industry is everyone’s job. Non-leather
hand protection products are designed
to enhance safety, comfort and worker
acceptance. The only missing ingredients
are training and enforcement. Workers
must be trained on the risks associated
with the jobs they are performing and
given the proper PPE to help reduce
those risks. New-age gloves are here to
make that happen.
Donald F. Groce is technical
product specialist and research
chemist at Showa Best Glove. He
is past chairman of the American
Industrial Hygiene Protective Clothing
Committee.
Reprinted from Industrial Safety & Hygiene News
July 2010 ©2010 Industrial Safety & Hygiene News