Phase inconsistencies and water effects in SAR - eLib

Fringe 2015
March 2015, ESRIN - Frascati
Phase inconsistencies and water effects in
SAR interferometric stacks
Francesco De Zan, Mariantonietta Zonno, Paco López-Dekker,
Alessandro Parizzi
German Aerospace Center - DLR
Oberpfaffenhofen - GERMANY
www.DLR.de
β€’ Chart 2
Phase inconsistencies and water effects > Francesco De Zan β€’ Fringe 2015 > 24.03.2015
Concept of phase consistency
Ξ¦123 = Phase < 𝐼1 𝐼2βˆ— >< 𝐼2 𝐼3βˆ— >< 𝐼3 𝐼1βˆ— > = πœ™12 + πœ™23 + πœ™31
πœ™23
πœ™23
πœ™12
πœ™12
πœ™31
πœ™31
πœ™12 + πœ™23 + πœ™31 = 0 (2πœ‹)
πœ™12 + πœ™23 + πœ™31 β‰  0 (2πœ‹)
www.DLR.de
β€’ Chart 3
Phase inconsistencies and water effects > Francesco De Zan β€’ Fringe 2015 > 24.03.2015
Basic sources of lack of consistency
ο‚ͺ Statistical variation of averaged interferograms
 Exploited in stack interferometric filtering (coherence based)
οƒ˜ Phase Linking (Monti Guarnieri & Tebaldini)
οƒ˜ SqueeSAR (Ferretti et al.)
 Expected to disappear with multilooking
ο‚ͺ Superposition of two or more scatterers with different
interferometric behavior
 Tomographic scenario (profile skewness, EUSAR 2014)
 Two scatterers with different displacements
 Propagation variation in semi-transparent medium
οƒ˜ TGRS 2014: β€œA SAR Interferometric Model for Soil Moistureβ€œ
www.DLR.de
β€’ Chart 4
Phase inconsistencies and water effects > Francesco De Zan β€’ Fringe 2015 > 24.03.2015
L-band over fields (agriculture)
ο‚ͺ
ESAR – AGRISAR Campaign
ο‚ͺ
Agricultural Fields
16/05/2006
13/06/2006
21/06/2006
Heights of ambiguity: 1087m, 81m, -75m
F. De Zan, A. Parizzi, P. Pr ats-Iraola, P. López-Dekker, β€œA SAR Inter ferometric Model for
Soil Moistureβ€œ IEEE TGaRS, Vol. 52, No. 1, Jan 2014
www.DLR.de
β€’ Chart 5
Phase inconsistencies and water effects > Francesco De Zan β€’ Fringe 2015 > 24.03.2015
Oblique incidence on lossy dielectric
Air
Ξ΅, real
Incident plane
wave
kz
kx’
Planes of constant
phase
Soil
Ρ’1, complex
kx
Im[kz’]
Planes of constant
amplitude
Re[kz’]
x
z
www.DLR.de
β€’ Chart 6
Phase inconsistencies and water effects > Francesco De Zan β€’ Fringe 2015 > 24.03.2015
Oblique incidence on lossy dielectric
Air
Ξ΅, real
Incident plane
wave
kz
kx’
Planes of constant
phase
Soil
Ρ’2, complex
kx
Im[kz’]
Planes of constant
amplitude
Re[kz’]
x
z
www.DLR.de
β€’ Chart 7
Phase inconsistencies and water effects > Francesco De Zan β€’ Fringe 2015 > 24.03.2015
Comparison of coherences and inconsistencies
(modeled and observed with AGRISAR 2006 data)
Data provided by the European Space Agency - © 2006
www.DLR.de
β€’ Chart 8
Phase inconsistencies and water effects > Francesco De Zan β€’ Fringe 2015 > 24.03.2015
Origin of phase inconsistencies
ο‚ͺ Two (or more) scattering contributions in the same resolution
cell or, at least, in the same averaging window
ο‚ͺ Independent phase and/or amplitude variations
𝑦1 = π‘Ž1 + 𝑏1 𝑒 π‘—πœ‘1
a
𝑦2 = π‘Ž2 + 𝑏2 𝑒 π‘—πœ‘2
b
𝑦3 = π‘Ž3 + 𝑏3 𝑒 π‘—πœ‘3
E 𝑦𝑛 π‘¦π‘˜ βˆ— = E π‘Žπ‘› π‘Žπ‘˜ βˆ— + E 𝑏𝑛 π‘π‘˜ βˆ— 𝑒 𝑗
πœ‘π‘› βˆ’πœ‘π‘˜
www.DLR.de
β€’ Chart 9
Phase inconsistencies and water effects > Francesco De Zan β€’ Fringe 2015 > 24.03.2015
Quantum mechanical parallel
ο‚ͺ Mapping a Q-bit on Bloch’s sphere
 Two independent states at opposite poles: 𝐴 and 𝐡
𝐴
 Relative weight controlled by πœƒ
 Relative phase controlled by πœ‘
 Phase inconsistency 𝛷 = π΄π‘Ÿπ‘’π‘Ž/2
ο‚ͺ 𝑆 = 𝐴 βˆ™ cos
πœƒ
2
+ 𝐡 βˆ™ sin
πœƒ
2
π΄π‘Ÿπ‘’π‘Ž
πœƒ
βˆ™ π‘’π‘—πœ‘
πœ‘
ο‚ͺ On this sphere one can easily study the
inconsistency (area) relation to
 relative phase changes
 relative weight changes
𝐡
www.DLR.de
β€’ Chart 10
Phase inconsistencies and water effects > Francesco De Zan β€’ Fringe 2015 > 24.03.2015
ERS-1 Data from 3-day-repeat phase of 1993-1994
Rome
Apennines
Data provided by the European Space Agency - © 1993-1994
www.DLR.de
β€’ Chart 11
Phase inconsistencies and water effects > Francesco De Zan β€’ Fringe 2015 > 24.03.2015
Volumetric effects
Date
26/12/1993 29/12/1993 01/01/1994
Date
19/01/1994 31/01/1994 03/02/1994
k z (rad/m)
0.1182
0.1047
-0.2296
k z (rad/m)
-0.204
0.0774
0.1266
Height of amb.
53.1 m
60 m
-27.3 m
Height of amb.
-30.8 m
81.2 m
49.6 m
Data provided by the European Space Agency - © 1993-1994
www.DLR.de
β€’ Chart 12
Phase inconsistencies and water effects > Francesco De Zan β€’ Fringe 2015 > 24.03.2015
Propagation effects in the forest?
Date
07/01/1994 24/02/1994 07/03/1994
Date
31/01/1994 05/03/1994 23/03/1994
k z (rad/m)
-0.009
0.038
-0.029
k z (rad/m)
-0.009
0.019
-0.009
Height of amb.
-698.1 m
-165.3 m
-216.6 m
Height of amb.
-698.1 m
-330.7 m
-698.1 m
Data provided by the European Space Agency - © 1993-1994
www.DLR.de
β€’ Chart 13
Phase inconsistencies and water effects > Francesco De Zan β€’ Fringe 2015 > 24.03.2015
TropiScat: ESA P-band scatterometer
ο‚ͺ P-band experiment in French Guiana from 2011-2012
 Scatterometer on a tower overlooking tropical forest
 Acquisitions every 15 minutes for long periods
οƒ˜ Tomography
οƒ˜ Polarimetry
οƒ˜ Interferometry
ο‚ͺ One of the main goals: study temporal decorrelation at different
time scales and the variations with height
www.DLR.de
β€’ Chart 14
Phase inconsistencies and water effects > Francesco De Zan β€’ Fringe 2015 > 24.03.2015
TropiScat intra-day complex coherences (examples)
www.DLR.de
β€’ Chart 15
Phase inconsistencies and water effects > Francesco De Zan β€’ Fringe 2015 > 24.03.2015
Tomographic - Interferometric analysis on TropiScat
ο‚ͺ Study of interferometric coherences at different heights, for
different polarizations
 First: tomography to slice the volume vertically
 Then: interferometry on each slice
ο‚ͺ A very similar study was done by the team POLIMI-CESBIO-
ONERA, but we also looked at interferometric phases:
 Phase and coherence variations are strongly coupled
 Clear nightly trends
 Possible explanation with water recharge
 Decorrelation as coherent mechanism
www.DLR.de
β€’ Chart 16
Phase inconsistencies and water effects > Francesco De Zan β€’ Fringe 2015 > 24.03.2015
Tomographic-interferometric coherences and phases
2011-12-15:00H00 οƒ  2011-12-18:23H45 (4 days)
HH Polarization
phase
40 deg
coherence
www.DLR.de
β€’ Chart 17
Phase inconsistencies and water effects > Francesco De Zan β€’ Fringe 2015 > 24.03.2015
Tomographic-interferometric coherences and phases
2011-12-15:00H00 οƒ  2011-12-18:23H45 (4 days)
VV Polarization
coherence
phase
www.DLR.de
β€’ Chart 18
Phase inconsistencies and water effects > Francesco De Zan β€’ Fringe 2015 > 24.03.2015
Interpretation and modeling
ο‚ͺ A negative phase corresponds to a delay: scatterers appear to
move away from the radar during the night!
ο‚ͺ Hypothesis: scatterers β€œseen” through sapwood
 Interferometric phase function of dielectric constant and
amount of fluids; variation stronger with height
 40 deg (@ P-band) = 3.7 mm of water = 3.3 cm of air
 Daily and nightly variations of dielectric constant in trees
οƒ˜
See: K.C. McDonald, R. Zimmermann, and J.S. Kimball, β€œDiurnal and spatial
variation of xylem dielectric constant in Norway Spruce (Picea abies [L.]
Karst.) as related to microclimate, xylem sap flow, and xylem chemistry,”
TGARS, vol. 40, no. 9, 2002
www.DLR.de
β€’ Chart 19
Phase inconsistencies and water effects > Francesco De Zan β€’ Fringe 2015 > 24.03.2015
How do I see it
Sapwood, variable πœ€π‘Ÿ
Heartwood
Scatterer at interface
Variable electrical length
Sap flow to leaves
www.DLR.de
β€’ Chart 20 β€’
Phase inconsistencies and water effects > Francesco De Zan β€’ Fringe 2015 > 24.03.2015
max bas = 26 m
Mexico city
www.DLR.de
β€’ Chart 21 β€’
Phase inconsistencies and water effects > Francesco De Zan β€’ Fringe 2015 > 24.03.2015
max bas = 37 m
Mexico city
www.DLR.de
β€’ Chart 22 β€’
Phase inconsistencies and water effects > Francesco De Zan β€’ Fringe 2015 > 24.03.2015
max bas > 270 m
Mexico city
www.DLR.de
β€’ Chart 23
Phase inconsistencies and water effects > Francesco De Zan β€’ Fringe 2015 > 24.03.2015
END
www.DLR.de
β€’ Chart 24
Phase inconsistencies and water effects > Francesco De Zan β€’ Fringe 2015 > 24.03.2015
Interferometric effects of vertical wavenumber
change
Change in the imaginary part only
no effect on the mean phase
(no differential effect)
Change in the real part only
phase effect
(differential effect)
exp(ο€­ jk z z ) ο€½ exp(Im[k z ]z ) exp(ο€­ j Re[k z ]z )
www.DLR.de
β€’ Chart 25
Phase inconsistencies and water effects > Francesco De Zan β€’ Fringe 2015 > 24.03.2015
TerraSAR-X
Crossing-orbits over Ice
( Antarctica)
www.DLR.de
β€’ Chart 26
Phase inconsistencies and water effects > Francesco De Zan β€’ Fringe 2015 > 24.03.2015
Volumetric scattering and cross-track baseline
ο‚ͺ The autocorrelation in the baselines is the Fourier transform of the profile
+∞
𝑅 π‘˜π‘§ =
autocorrelation
(interferogram)
𝑓(𝑧)π‘’π‘—π‘˜π‘§ 𝑧 𝑑𝑧
βˆ’βˆž
profile
ο‚ͺ Let’s separate the autocorrelation in amplitude and phase
𝑅 π‘˜π‘§ = 𝐴 π‘˜π‘§ π‘’π‘—πœ‘
Amplitude (coherence)
π‘˜π‘§
interferometric phase
ο‚ͺ There is an interesting relation of interferogram coherence and phase with
the profile moments
www.DLR.de
β€’ Chart 27
Phase inconsistencies and water effects > Francesco De Zan β€’ Fringe 2015 > 24.03.2015
Taylor expansion of interferogram phase and
amplitude
ο‚ͺ Amplitude and phase show even and odd symmetries because the
autocorrelation 𝑅 π‘˜π‘§ is Hermitian
ο‚ͺ The Taylor expansions reflect the symmetries
 Only odd terms in the phase expansion
πœ‘ π‘˜π‘§ = πœ‘ 0 + πœ‘β€² 0 π‘˜π‘§ + 12πœ‘β€²β€² 0 π‘˜π‘§2 + 16πœ‘β€²β€²β€² 0 π‘˜π‘§3 + β‹―
 Only even terms in the amplitude expansion
𝐴 π‘˜π‘§ = 𝐴 0 + 𝐴′ 0 π‘˜π‘§ + 12𝐴′′ 0 π‘˜π‘§2 + 16𝐴′′′ 0 π‘˜π‘§3 + β‹―
ο‚ͺ Consequence
 The phases describe the odd part of autocorrelation (even
moments)
 The amplitudes describe the even part of autocorrelation (odd
moments)
www.DLR.de
β€’ Chart 28
Phase inconsistencies and water effects > Francesco De Zan β€’ Fringe 2015 > 24.03.2015
Profile moments and derivatives of autocorrelation
ο‚ͺ From
𝑑
𝑛
π‘‘π‘˜π‘§
𝑅|π‘˜π‘§ =0 = 𝑗 𝑛 𝐸 𝑧 𝑛 one can show that:
πœ‘β€² 0 = 𝐸 𝑧 = πœ‡ 𝑧
𝐴′′ 0 = βˆ’E (𝑧 βˆ’πœ‡ 𝑧 )2
πœ‘β€²β€²β€² 0 = βˆ’E (𝑧 βˆ’πœ‡ 𝑧 )3
𝐴𝐼𝑉 0 = E (𝑧 βˆ’πœ‡ 𝑧 )4
 Mean:
 Variance:
 Skewness:
 Kurtosis:
ο‚ͺ With Taylor approximations
 πœ‘ π‘˜π‘§ = πœ‡ 𝑧 π‘˜π‘§ + β‹―
1
2
 𝛾 π‘˜π‘§ = 1 βˆ’ Var 𝑧 π‘˜π‘§2 + β‹―
1
 πœ‘ π‘˜π‘§ β€² + πœ‘ π‘˜π‘§ β€²β€² βˆ’ πœ‘ π‘˜π‘§β€² + π‘˜π‘§β€²β€² = E (𝑧 βˆ’πœ‡ 𝑧 )3 (π‘˜π‘§β€² + π‘˜π‘§β€²β€² )(π‘˜π‘§β€² π‘˜π‘§β€²β€² ) + β‹―
2
www.DLR.de
β€’ Chart 29
Phase inconsistencies and water effects > Francesco De Zan β€’ Fringe 2015 > 24.03.2015
Each baseline varies linearly -> product is a cubic
kz1 * kz2 * kz3
www.DLR.de
β€’ Chart 30
Phase inconsistencies and water effects > Francesco De Zan β€’ Fringe 2015 > 24.03.2015
+40 deg
2012-07-25
2012-08-16
2012-12-26
0 deg
βˆ’40 deg
+40 deg
2012-07-03
2012-08-16
2012-09-07
0 deg
βˆ’40 deg
+40 deg
2012-06-11
2012-06-22
2012-07-25
TerraSAR-X
Afar triangle
Desc - Morning
0 deg
βˆ’40 deg