Course title Rule-of-Law Institutions in the Evolving European Context Duration 1 week Dates September 7 – September 9 Instructor Prof. Elaine Mak, Erasmus University Rotterdam Course objectives The course aims to engage students in a reflection concerning the role of rule-of-law institutions in the contemporary EU legal context and to analyse this theme in light of the theoretical, legal and empirical insights provided during the course. Besides the in-depth study of current legal issues, the course aims to assist students in becoming (further) acquainted with an interdisciplinary perspective on the study of law. Course Description Rule-of-law institutions (legislators, administrative bodies, courts) in member states of the European Union (EU) and at the level of the EU have an increasingly complex role. The process of legal integration in Europe demands of the rule-of-law institutions to establish the balance between possibly overlapping or conflicting national and European rules and to safeguard fundamental principles of law in a context of value pluralism. In this context, the possibilities and constraints regarding formal exchange between institutions, through parliamentary, administrative or judicial procedures, and informal exchange, through transnational ‘dialogue’, deserve further exploration. Moreover, changing societal expectations concerning rule-making and judicial decision-making have added new dimensions to the functioning of rule-of-law institutions in Europe. In particular, competition with private regulation (e.g. by non-governmental organisations, multinationals, banks) and private dispute settlement (e.g. mediation, arbitration) has increased under the effects of evolved standards of quality and efficiency. In light of these developments, the question arises of how the institutional survival of rule-of-law institutions in the evolving European context can be secured. What is the role of national and European legislators, administrative bodies and courts in the contemporary context, in particular in relation to each other and in relation to private actors engaging in rule-making and dispute settlement? To what extent are institutional reforms and the development of new values and approaches to rule-making and judicial decision-making desirable and possible in order to meet legal and societal demands? This course addresses these questions through the study of relevant literature and case law concerning the demands of legitimacy and the forms of interaction of rule-of-law institutions in Europe. Specific topics, which will be addressed in class discussions, are: 1) the procedural and substantive aspects of legitimacy of rule-of-law institutions in the EU’s multi-level legal context; 2) the role of EU standards for ‘better regulation’ in rule-making involving national parliaments and the European Parliament; 3) the role of transnational judicial dialogue between courts in EU member states and between national courts and the Court of Justice of the EU. Course Outline Session 1 (7 September): Legitimacy of rule-of-law institutions in Europe o principles and procedures of institutional interaction in a multi-level legal context o national rule-of-law institutions, European institutions and private actors: competences and interaction Session 2 (8 September): Rule-making in the European legal context o principles and procedures of EU rule-making, in particular concerning ‘better regulation’ o role of parliaments in relation to each other and to other actors Session 3 (9 September): Judicial decision-making in the European legal context o principles and procedures of legal protection and law development in individual cases o dialogue between national highest courts and the CJEU Educational Outcomes After completing this course, students: o will have gained insight into the challenges to the functioning of rule-of-law institutions in the contemporary EU legal context; o will be able to reflect on the legal and contextual aspects related to the functioning of rule-oflaw institutions in the multi-level legal order of the EU; o will be able to analyse and evaluate specific topics related to legal integration and competition between institutions with powers of rule-making and judicial decision-making in the EU; o will have trained their ability to use their knowledge in a group discussion. Basic Bibliography Session 1: - P. Craig, ‘Pringle and the Use of EU Institutions Outside the EU Legal Framework: Foundations, Procedure and Substance’ [2013] 9 European Constitutional Law Review 263 - M. Dawson, ‘Three Waves of New Governance in the European Union’ [2011] 36 European Law Review 208 - D. Schiek, ‘Private Rule-Making and European Governance: Issues of Legitimacy’ [2007] 32 European Law Review 443 - V. Reding, ‘The EU and the Rule of Law: What Next?’, lecture at Centre for European Policy Studies, Brussels, 4 September 2013, available at http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_SPEECH-13677_nl.htm Session 2: - D. Jančić, ‘Representative Democracy Across Levels? National Parliaments and EU Constitutionalism’ [2012] 8 Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy 227, available at http://www.cyelp.com/index.php/cyelp/article/view/132 - A. Meuwese and C.M. Radaelli, ‘Hard Questions, Hard Solutions: Proceduralisation Through Impact Assessment in the EU’ [2010] 33 West European Politics 136, available at https://pure.uvt.nl/portal/files/1297093/Meuwese_Hard_questions_an d_equally_hard_solutions_110118_postprint_immediately.pdf - E. Fisher, ‘Unpacking the Toolbox: Or Why the Public/Private Divide is Important in EC Environmental Law’, FSU College of Law, Public Law Working Paper 2001/35, available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=283295 Session 3: - K. Lenaerts, ‘Upholding Union Values in Times of Societal Change: The Role of the Court of Justice of the European Union’, lecture Durham European Law Institute, 17 February 2014, available at https://www.dur.ac.uk/resources/deli/events/annual%20lecture%2020 14/Lenaerts_2014_Durham.pdf - A. Torres Perez, ‘Melloni in Three Acts: From Dialogue to Monologue’ [2014] 10 European Constitutional Law Review 308, available at www.academia.edu (user registration required) - CJEU 26 February 2013, Case C-399/11, Stefano Melloni v. Ministerio Fiscal, available at http://curia.europa.eu/juris/liste.jsf?language=en&num=C-399/11 - Spanish Constitutional Court, STC 26/2014, 13 February 2014, unofficial translation in English available at http://www.tribunalconstitucional.es/es/jurisprudencia/restrad/Paginas /JCCJCC262014en.aspx Course Prerequisites Students should be acquainted with the basics of EU (constitutional) law, in particular concerning the role of the EU institutions and the relationship between EU law and the domestic laws of the Member States. Additional knowledge regarding (comparative) constitutional law of EU member states or concerning interdisciplinary perspectives on EU law and governance is helpful but not a prerequisite for following the course. Students can consult the following background readings to brush up their knowledge and become more familiar with the theme of the course: - A. Arnull, The European Union and Its Court of Justice, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2006 (2nd edition) - M. Avbelj and J. Komarek (eds.), Constitutional Pluralism in the European Union and Beyond, Oxford: Hart Publishing 2012 - P. Craig, EU Administrative Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012 (2nd edition) - P. Craig and G. de Búrca, EU Law: Text, Cases and Materials, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2011 (5th edition) - A. Rosas and L. Armati, EU Constitutional Law: An Introduction, Oxford: Hart Publishing 2012 (2nd edition) - G. Teubner, Constitutional Fragments: Societal Constitutionalism and Globalization, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012 Teaching Methodology Frontal lectures Active participation Language English Location EPLO Headquarters, Sounion General note N/A 50 % 50 %
© Copyright 2024