CHAPTER 15, SECTION 15.1 “HISTORY OF EVOLUTIONARY THOUGHT” THIS GUY . . . WE ALL KNOW HIM: EVOLUTIONARY ADAPTATION? BEHAVIORAL ADAPTATION? “ACCLIMATIZATION”? TIME LINE OF HISTORIANS: 1. Jean Baptiste Lamarck (French) 1744-1829 *Inheritance of acquired characteristics 2. Thomas Malthus (UK) 1766-1834 *An Essay on the Principle of Population, how human populations will grow faster than food sources 3. George Cuvier (French) 1769-1832 *Geology & studies of fossils – “castastrophism” 4. Charles Lyell (UK) 1797-1875 *Geology, studies of fossils & living organisms on trip around the world – “uniformitarianism” TIME LINE . . . . CONTINUED: 5. Charles Darwin (UK) 1809-1882 *Geology, studies of fossils & living organisms on trip around the world “descent with modification” and book: On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection 6. Alfred Russel Wallace (UK) 1823 to 1913 *Biogeography, biology, zoology, anthropology, natural selection co-discoverer *Was colleague and science-friend to Darwin DARWIN’S IDEAS IN 4 IMPORTANT PARTS: 1. Overproduction – more offspring will likely be produced than there are resources to support them to reproductive adulthood 2. Genetic variation – members of a population will have genetic traits and variations that may/may not be favorable 3. Struggle to survive – members of a population with beneficial genetic variations will be most likely to survive hardship – now called ADAPTATION 4. Differential reproduction – only population members with the best adaptations, will survive and likely reproduce; their offspring will likely have the same favorable genetic adaptations THICK FUR IS BAD EXAMPLE! If you move to Antarctica, will YOU grow thicker hair? Can you grow thicker hair? How is the thickness of your hair determined? Can you change that? So . . . . what’s the deal? It’s the same with ALL living organisms! ADAPTATION ACCLIMATIZATION *Genetic – genes, sequences of nucleic acids on DNA *Behavioral – changing habits if possible *Inheritable *Having the ABILITY and INTELLIGENCE to do so – that is likely inherited, but could also be learned *Do you have the genetic adaptation to wear coats in winter? *Do you have the genetic adaptation to grow your own coat in winter? *Do you have the genetic adaptation of intelligence to know you should wear a coat in winter? *Do you inherit the behavior of wearing coats in winter? *Do you learn the behavior of wearing coats in winter? *Is wearing coats in winter a inherited as a gene? OK, SO NOW THINK ABOUT IT: EVOLUTIONARY ADAPTATION? BEHAVIORAL ADAPTATION? “ACCLIMATIZATION”? THIS GUY . . . WE DON’T KNOW HIM: EVOLUTIONARY ADAPTATION? BEHAVIORAL ADAPTATION? “ACCLIMATIZATION”? RED FOX, NATIVE OF MOST OF THE US AND CANADA RED FOX, NATIVE OF MOST OF THE US AND CANADA EVOLUTIONARY ADAPTATION? BEHAVIORAL ADAPTATION? “ACCLIMATIZATION”? ARCTIC FOX – WINTER & SUMMER, NATIVE OF EXTREME NORTH AMERICA EVOLUTIONARY ADAPTATION? BEHAVIORAL ADAPTATION? “ACCLIMATIZATION”? RED FOX & DESERT FOX (NATIVE OF SW US AND NORTH-CENTRAL MEXICO) DIFFERENT SPECIES EVOLUTIONARY ADAPTATION? BEHAVIORAL ADAPTATION? “ACCLIMATIZATION”? 15.2 EVIDENCE OF EVOLUTION PP302-7 REVIEW FROM CH. 17 CLASSIFICATION: FORMS OF EVIDENCE USED BY MODERN PHYLOGENISTS v FOSSILS *AGE – SUPERPOSITION-OLDEST ON THE BOTTOM *1669 NICOLAUS STENO (DANISH) *RELATIVE AGE – COMPARED TO THE APPROXIMATE AGES OF THE OTHER FOSSILS IN THE AREA, LAYERS = STRATA *ABSOLUTE AGE – MORE ACCURATE USING RADIOACTIVE ISOTOPES v FOSSILS CONTINUED: *DIFFERENT ORGANISMS LIVED AT DIFFERENT TIMES *TODAY’S ORGANISMS ARE DIFFERENT FROM THOSE THAT LIVED IN THE PAST *FOSSILS NEAR ONE ANOTHER ARE MORE LIKE ONE ANOTHER *THE LOCATION OF FOSSILS PROVIDES EVIDENCE OF WHERE THE ORGANISMS LIVED *TRANSITIONAL SPECIES PROVIDE LINKS REVIEW FROM CH. 17 CLASSIFICATION: FORMS OF EVIDENCE USED BY MODERN PHYLOGENETICISTS v BIOGEOGRAPHY *THE STUDY OF WHERE LIVING ORGANISMS CURRENTLY LIVE – AND THEIR CONNECTIONS TO ORGANISMS LIVING NEAR THEM *AUSTRALIAN ANIMALS HAVE BEEN EVOLVING MILLIONS OF YEARS ISOLATED FROM ANIMALS OF THE REST OF THE WORLD – YET THEY HAVE SIMILARITIES TO CATS, DOGS, RATS, MICE, MOLES, OSTRICHES, PARROTS, ETC. REVIEW FROM CH. 17 CLASSIFCATION: FORMS OF EVIDENCE USED BY MODERN PHYLOGENETICISTS ANATOMY – HOMOLOGOUS STRUCTURES EMBRYOLOGY – SIMILARITIES IN EMBRYOS MOLECULES – DNA, RNA PROTEINS, ETC. GENETICS - IN THE MID 1900’S HELPED PUT TOGETHER ALL THE EVIDENCE WHEN DNA WAS CONFIRMED AS THE HEREDITARY MOLECULE - THERE’S NO BETTER PROOF OF RELATIONSHIPS AND EVOLUTION THAN DNA REMEMBER THE DIFFERENCE! ANALOGOUS STRUCTURES VS. HOMOLOGOUS STRUCTURES! SO, HOW DO WE USE ALL THE EVIDENCE FROM THE PAST AND COMBINE IT WITH EVIDENCE AVAILABLE THROUGH MODERN TECHNOLOGY??? IT’S CALLED “MODERN SYNTHESIS:” COMBINING EVIDENCE FROM NATURAL SELECTION AND DESCENT WITH MODIFICATION WITH NEW FORMS OF EVIDENCE DARWIN DIDN’T HAVE HOWEVER, WE CAN STILL CLASSIFY WITH PHYLOGENETIC TREES – BASED ON MODERN EVIDENCES, LIKE SIMILARITIES IN PROTEINS, DNA, EMBRYOLOGIC DEVELOPMENT, ETC. IT’S A VERY NATURAL TRANSITION IN SCIENTIFIC THOUGHT 15.3 EVOLUTION IN ACTION PP308-10 PATTERNS OF EVOLUTION: CONVERGENT DIVERGENT *DIFFERENT SPECIES *SAME SPECIES *DEVELOP SIMILARITIES *DEVELOP DIFFERENCES *BECAUSE THEY INHABIT SIMILAR ENVIRONMENTS AND HAVE SIMILAR LIFESTYLES *BECAUSE THERE IS COMPETITION FOR RESOURCES IN THE ENVIRONMENT *YET THEY REMAIN SEPARATE SPECIES *THEY DEVELOP INTO DIFFERENT SPECIES *TO REDUCE COMPETITION AND USE DIFFERENT RESOURCES ADAPTIVE RADIATION – A FORM OF DIVERGENT EVOLUTION DARWIN’S FINCHES: *OFTEN IN GEOGRAPHIC ISOLATION *ONE SPECIES DIVERGES TO UTILIZE ALL AVAILABLE RESOURCES AND REDUCE COMPETITION ARTIFICIAL SELECTION – WHEN HUMANS THINK THEY KNOW WHAT IS BEST! IT’S JUST NOT NATURAL . . . . COEVOLUTION: WHEN 2 SPECIES CHANGE TOGETHER TO MAINTAIN THEIR RELATIONSHIP pollinators and plants parasites and hosts etc. . . . many examples
© Copyright 2024