Global Journal of Agricultural Research and Reviews ISSN: 2437-1858 Vol. 3 (2), pp. 133-145, May, 2015. © Global Science Research Journals http://www.globalscienceresearchjournals.org/ Full Length Research Paper Tropical Atlantic variability impacts on the Sub-middle São Francisco Valley, a Brazilian wine-producing area Dóris Veleda1,2*, Raul Montagne2,3, Moacyr Araujo1,2, Giuliano Pereira4, Pedro Tyaquiçã1,2, Carlos Noriega1,2, Francis Lacerda5 1 Departamento de Oceanografia, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE), Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil. Centro de Estudos e Ensaios em Risco e Modelagem Ambiental, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE), Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil. 3 Departamento de Física, Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE), Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil. 4 Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (EMBRAPA) Uva e Vinho - Semiárido, Petrolina, Pernambuco, Brazil. 5 Instituto Agronômico de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil. 2 Accepted 23 April, 2015 Abstract The Sub-middle São Francisco Valley (SMSF), Northeast Brazil, is known for its great potential for viticulture, as it is one of the few regions in the world with two to three harvests per year. Results presented here establish the influence of remote Sea Surface Temperature (SST) on the rainfall variability and wine chemical compounds in the SMSF. Cross-correlation analyses show that the rainfall in the SMSF is negatively correlated with the SST at the North Tropical Atlantic, and positively correlated with the SST at Southwestern Atlantic. Cross-wavelet analyses identify that, in addition to the annual signal, intermittent signals in rainfall at the SMSF respond to remote influences of the SST with 3-4 months of periodicity at interannual timescales (~36-month band). Coherence analyses identify that the SST in Southwestern Atlantic affects the rainfall in the SMSF at the 3-4-month periodicity band. Principal Component Analysis indicated different influences between wet and dry meteorological seasons on the chemical wine samples produced at SMSF. Extreme rainfalls observed during 2009, are linked to northward displacement of the South Atlantic Convergence Zone, when strong rainfall and high relative humidity at SMSF contributed to reduce Free Sulfur Dioxide (FSO2) in grapes. During dry seasons the northward displacement of Intertropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ) is correlated to lower rainfall and relative humidity (RH) in SMSF region, resulting in higher Sulfur Dioxide (TSO2, FSO2), alcohol and higher acidity (VOL. AC) wines. Keywords: Wine chemical compounds, rainfall, sea surface temperature, Sub-middle São Francisco Valley, tropical Atlantic Ocean, principal component analysis, cross-wavelet analysis. INTRODUCTION The local climatic condition is one of the key factors influencing the grapevine phenology (Caprio & Quamme 2002; Jones et al. 2005; Soar et al. 2008; Hall & Jones 2008; Ramos et al. 2008; Caffarra & Eccel 2010, 2011). *Corresponding Author. E-mail: [email protected] Weather conditions control the growth and the grape physiology, such as the tannin, acid and sugar content, i.e. the main ingredients entering in the phenolic composition of grapes (Spayd et al. 2002) and thus driving the wine quality (Montes 2010). Furthermore, seasonal and interannual climate variability, sometimes coming from remote regions, may have a direct influence on the quantity and quality of agricultural production Glob. J. Agric. Res. Rev. 134 (Salinger et al. 2005; Chevet et al. 2011). For instance, the indirect influence of the oceanic regions on different cultures of vineyards has been analyzed by authors, such as Bonnardot et al. (2005) Grifoni et al. (2006) and Montes (2010). Of the climatic factors that come into play, the most important are air temperature, sunshine hours and rainfall. Consequently, viticulture and wine industries are both particularly affected by climatic variations (Chevet et al. 2011). If the air temperature and the sunshine duration follow mainly the regional conditions, the rainfall variability can often resulting from remote forcing, as for instance humidity coming from adjacent oceanic regions. The behavior of grapevines involves adequate weather conditions, which control the tannin, acid and sugar content that are key components influencing wine quality (Montes 2010), such as the phenolic composition of grapes (Spayd et al. 2002). While daily extreme weather conditions can influence grape physiology and growth, seasonal and interannual climate variability, such as drought and other climate extremes events, have a direct influence on the quantity and quality of agricultural production (Salinger et al. 2005). This scenario is verified in the Sub-middle São Francisco River Valley (hereafter referred to as SMSF region), one of the most important wine-producing areas in Brazil, which is often subjected to periods of prolonged drought or, conversely, to heavy rainfall episodes (Rao et al. 1993). Located around the latitude of 8°30 S, in a region presenting a tropical semiarid climate, the vineyards of SMSF are considered on all the planet as the closest to Equator. In spite of these dry weather conditions, the big advantage of the SMSF region comes from plentiful water resources for the irrigation due to the proximity of the São Francisco River, the biggest Brazilian river which rises inside Brazil and pours in the Atlantic Ocean along the Brazilian coast. That allows to give to the wine growers the complete control of the hydric contributions (SECTI 2008). After the grape harvest, it is enough to stop irrigating so that the vineyard undergoes a stress which brings down its leaves and lets in dormancy, just like the winter makes it in temperate regions. But unlike these, instead of waiting for the spring, it is enough, one couple of weeks later, to reopen the water gates, so that the vineyard begins a new vegetative cycle, what allows to obtain two, even three harvests a year. The vineyards of São Francisco count approximately 10,500 ha, among which 500 for the production of wine, the rest being intended for the production of dessert grapes. The most used vines are the Syrah, the Cabernet-Sauvignon and the Cabernet Ruby (crossing of Cabernet-Sauvignon and Carignan), for red wines, White Chenin and Canelli Muscatel for the whites wines. Since the SMSF’s wine boom of the 1980s, its production has received heavy funding, as the weather in this region allows the harvesting of grapes and other tropical fruits at any time of the year (Rabobank 2005). The SMSF is actually the second largest fine wine-producing region of Brazil, where the wine industry employs directly and indirectly approximately 6,000 people, contributing in turn to the cities of the region, mainly Petrolina-PE and Juazeiro-BA, the two most important industrial hubs of the São Francisco Valley. During the dry season, i.e. between June and December, irrigation techniques associated with optimal sunny and warm conditions, allow harvesting of grapes with high enological potential. Conversely, during the main rainy season, from January to May, it may happen that the excess of precipitation can lower the quality of sugar and acids, which in turn can reduce the flavors of the wine grapes and damage the harvests. The enological research in SMSF has a focus on developing different agronomical practices, developing new products, explaining the characteristics wines produced under tropical climate in the Northeast of Brazil and attempting to find chemical markers distinctive of this region. This paper aimed to investigate the links between SST in the tropical Atlantic and rainfall variability in the SMSF events, with a focus on the remote influence of the ocean temperature on the interannual variability of extreme rainfall events at the SMSF, as well as the influence of these extreme events on the chemical compounds of wines produced in this region. It is expected that the analyses presented herein give climatological support for a more effective adaptation of techniques for water resource management and for the agriculture activities in this important Brazilian viticulture region. MATERIAL AND METHODS Site Selection and Description The SMSF region makes part of the Northeast of Brazil (NEB) which spreads between 1°-18°S and 35°-47°W (Rao et al. 1993). The NEB is roughly divided into three different climatic areas, the Northern, the Eastern, and the South-Central parts (Moura & Shukla 1981; Rao et al. 1993; Chaves & Cavalcanti 2001). The SMSF region is centered on the geographical division between the Northern and the South-Central parts, and it is located between the parallels 8°S and 9°S, around 40°W. The mean altitude is 330 m (Figure 1). The mean temperature is 27°C, with a small annual range below to 2°C. The cumulated yearly precipitation varies generally from 350 to 600 mm, but with the rainy season only concentrated between January and April (Marsden et al. 1996; Tonietto & Carbonneau 2004). During the rest of the year, the long dry season from May to December, the relative air humidity is always close to 50%. As for most of the Northeast of Brazil (NEB), the distribution of rainfall in the SMSF region is not of local origin, and the moisture source is attributed to the tropical Veleda et al. 135 Figure 1: Key meteorological systems acting on the Sub-middle São Francisco Valley (in yellow), São Francisco River Basin, Northeast Brazil: Seasonal positions of the ITCZ (September and March), the SACZ intrusion and the representation of the HLTCV. The locations of the PIRATA buoys 15°N38°W and 14°S32°W in tropical Atlantic are also indicated. Atlantic Ocean (e.g. Ramos 1975). In fact, it was proved that the sea surface temperature (SST) variability in the tropical Atlantic has a strong impact on the regional climates over the Americas and Africa. The SST modulates the rainfall anomaly patterns that cause severe droughts and floods over tropical areas such as the NEB (Hastenrath & Heller 1977; Moura & Shukla 1981; Nobre & Shukla 1996; Nobre et al. 2004) and the African Sahel (Palmer 1986; Lough 1986; Parker et al. 1988). In particular, the rainfall variability in the Northern and central semiarid regions of the NEB is associated with variations of the inter-hemispheric gradient of SST anomalies in the tropical Atlantic along with the northsouth migrations of the Inter Tropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ) (Hastenrath & Greischar 1993; Moscati & Gan 2007; Hastenrath 2011). The NEB presents pronounced time and space variability in the rainfall distribution as result of different atmospheric forcings (Rao et al. 1993; Chaves & Cavalcanti 2001; Hastenrath 2011). The amount and frequency of precipitation can fluctuate enormously from one year to the next. This interannual variability in rainfall is mainly controlled by the sea-surface temperatures of the tropical Pacific and Atlantic and is associated with El Niño/La Niña events, which cause extreme drought/rainfall over this region. Other meteorological systems are observed during the austral spring and summer, bringing rainfall to the southern, western and central regions of the NEB. One can distinguish the following key meteorological systems: The Inter Tropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ), which causes a maximum rainfall in the SMSF from February to April as a consequence of its southernmost displacement (Kousky & Chu 1978; Rodrigues et al. 2011). The latitudinal location of the ITCZ is determined, among other phenomena, by the meridional peak of the SST. The South Atlantic Convergence Zone (SACZ), which brings rainfall to the semiarid region of the NEB during austral spring and summer (Ferreira et al. 2001; Paegle & Mo 2002). The SACZ is characterized by an organized Convective Cloud-Band (CCB) that generally extends from the Amazon to the Atlantic Ocean in a northwestsoutheast axis (Kousky 1988; Lenters & Cook 1995; Robertson & Mechoso 2000; Barreiro et al. 2002). This system is typically observed during the summer months (November to March), when the tropical convection is stronger, contributing to the generation and maintenance of the phenomenon (Kodama 1992). The third meteorological system influencing the time variability of the rainfall over the NEB is the High-Level Troposphere Cyclonic Vortices (HLTCVs), which also occur more frequently in January and February (Ferreira et al. 2001). These cyclonic vortices are formed and/or intensified downstream from strongly amplifying mid-latitude frontal systems, which can penetrate fairly deeply into the South Atlantic subtropic. HLTCVs are maintained by a direct thermal circulation, with cold air sinking in the center and relatively warm air rising on the periphery (Frank 1970; Kousky & Gan 1981). Sea Surface Temperature, Meteorological Data and Wine Chemical Compounds The Sea Surface Temperature (SST) data are collected from the ATLAS buoy moored at 15°N38°W (February 1998 to April 2011) and 14°S32°W (September 2005 to April 2011) as part of the Prediction and Research moored Array in the Tropical Atlantic Project (PIRATA) Glob. J. Agric. Res. Rev. 136 Table 1: Wines from Ouro Verde Farm, Casa Nova-BA, SMSF, for the harvests 2008 to 2010, and the respective acronyms used in the Principal Component Analysis. WINE HARVEST ACRONYM WWYY_HY(Wine,Year,Halfyear) Chenin Blanc VerdejoT1 Viognier Sauvignon Blanc Grenache Cabernet Sauvignon Tempranillo Syrah Petit Verdot Tempranillo2 Syrah Verdejo Chenin Blanc T4 Chenin Blanc T2 Tempranillo VerdejoT2 VerdejoT3 Chenin BlancT1 Sauvignon Blanc CheninT3 VerdejoT4 Syrah192 Syrah193 Syrah194 Syrah rótulo Petit Verdot Sauvignon Blanc liqueur Viognier liqueur Scarlitta 72hmac Grenache Rosé Scarlitta s.mac Grenache liqueur Grenache Cabernet Sauvignon Cabernet Sauvignon T1 Cabernet SauvignonT2 Cabernet SauvignonT3 Viognier Sauvignon Blanc SyrahT1 SyrahT2 SyrahT3 TempranilleT1 TempranilleT2 TempranilleT3 MarianaT1 MarianaT2 2/2008 2/2008 2/2008 2/2008 2/2008 2/2008 2/2008 2/2008 2/2008 2/2008 2/2008 1/2009 1/2009 1/2009 1/2009 2/2009 2/2009 2/2009 2/2009 2/2009 2/2009 2/2009 2/2009 2/2009 2/2009 2/2009 2/2009 2/2009 2/2009 2/2009 2/2009 2/2009 2/2009 2/2009 2/2009 2/2009 2/2009 1/2010 1/2010 1/2010 1/2010 1/2010 1/2010 1/2010 1/2010 1/2010 1/2010 CB08_2 Ve08_2 Vi08_2 SB08_2 Gr08_2 CS08_2 Te08_2 Sy08_2 PV08_2 Te08_2 Sy08_2 Ve09_1 CB09_1 CB09_1 Te09_1 Ve09_2 Ve09_2 Ve09_2 CB09_2 SB09_2 Ch09_2 Ve09_2 Sy09_2 Sy09_2 Sy09_2 Sy09_2 PV09_2 SBL09_2 VL09_2 Sc09_2 GR09_2 Sc09_2 Gr09_2 Gr09_2 CS09_2 CS09_2 CS09_2 Vi10_1 SB10_1 Sy10_1 Sy10_1 Sy10_1 Te10_1 Te10_1 Te10_1 Ma10_1 Ma10_1 Veleda et al. 137 Table 1 cont’d MarianaT3 MarianaT4 MarianaT5 Grenache Rosé1 Grenache Rosé2 Grenache Red SyrahT1 SyrahT2 SyrahT3 SyrahT4 SyrahT5 SyrahT6 SyrahT7 SyrahT8 1/2010 1/2010 1/2010 2/2010 2/2010 2/2010 2/2010 2/2010 2/2010 2/2010 2/2010 2/2010 2/2010 2/2010 (Servain et al. 1998; Bourlès et al. 2008). The primary objective of the PIRATA Project is to understand the seasonal and interannual variability of the coupled oceanatmosphere interactions over the tropical Atlantic as a scientific way to improve the climate forecast (Bourlès et al. 2008; McPhaden et al. 2010). The Autonomous Temperature Line Acquisition System - ATLAS buoys in the original array of the PIRATA Project were launched in 1997 (Servain et al. 1998). Since then, daily transmissions of ocean temperature have been collected and transmitted via the Argos satellite system and made available on the web since their validation (http://www.pmel.noaa.gov/pirata/). The PIRATA site 15°N38°W was chosen as an indicator of the variability of the ITCZ position (Hastenrath & Greischar 1993; Uvo et al. 1998; Hastenrath 2011), while 14°S32°W buoy sensors receive the influence of the SACZ (Lenters & Cook 1995; Robertson & Mechoso 2000; Paegle & Mo 2002; Barreiro et al. 2002). To ensure the long-term SST information were compatible with the rainfall time series, we used a series of monthly composites of 4-km Pathfinder V5 Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) to fill the gaps during the time period of October 2004 to July 2005 for the buoy at 15°N38°W and to complete the series for the buoy at 14°S32°W, from February 1998 to August 2005. The meteorological monthly data in the SMSF were obtained from the Meteorological Station Bebedouro, Petrolina-PE, located at 09°09'S-40°22'W. These data are delivered by the EMBRAPA - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (www.cpatsa.embrapa.br). In a first analysis we used monthly mean rainfall and SST series (January 1998 to April 2011) in order to identify possible correlations between extreme events and seawater temperature. After that, monthly meteorological parameters as relative humidity (RH), maximum air temperature (MAXT), minimum air temperature (MINT), mean air temperature (MEANT) and insolation (INS), Ma10_1 Ma10_1 Ma10_1 GR10_2 GR10_2 GT10_2 Sy10_2 Sy10_2 Sy10_2 Sy10_2 Sy10_2 Sy10_2 Sy10_2 Sy10_2 were used to detect probable impacts of extreme rainfall events on chemical compounds of different wines produced in the commercial vineyard Ouro Verde Farm (Casa Nova-BA, SMSF) (harvests 2008 to 2010), as presented in Table 1. These compounds are: pH, Alcohol, Total Acidity (TOT.AC.), Volatile Acidity (VOL.AC.), Free Sulfur Dioxide (FSO2) and Total Sulfur Dioxide (TSO2). Cross-correlation Function, Coherence Analysis Cross-Wavelet and The correlations between SST and rainfall time series were analyzed using cross-correlation function, crosswavelet and coherence analyses. The cross-correlation functions are commonly used in geophysical time series analysis, and they indicate how closely two recorded data are related in the time domain (Emery & Thompson 2001). The signals with higher variance were pointed out using wavelet analyses. This approach also identifies the frequency of occurrence of the most important signals and its location in the time-frequency domain. The concept of the wavelet transform was formalized in the early 1980s in a series of papers published by Morlet (1981). Since its introduction, wavelet analysis has been applied to numerous studies in the atmospheric and oceanic sciences and in physics, biology and economics, among others. A complete description, mainly focused on the geophysical applications of wavelet analysis, can be found in (Kumar & Foufoula-Georgiou 1997); a theoretical treatment of wavelet analysis is given in (Daubechies 1992, 1999); and a broad perspective on the principles and applications of transient signal processing with wavelets is presented in (Mallat 1998; Torrence & Compo 1998). Liu, among others, investigated atmospheric and/or oceanic variability using wavelet analysis (Liu 1994; Gu & Philander 1995; Setoh et al. 1999; Veleda et al. 2012). Here, we use the Morlet wavelet as a mother Glob. J. Agric. Res. Rev. 138 function, as it proved to be the most adequate for geophysical applications (Gu & Philander 1995; Setoh & Imawaki 1999; Lau & Weng 1999). The wavelet spectrum is defined as the square root of the wavelet transform module, and it provides a measure of the variance in each series and time scale. Besides the analysis of a time series itself, it is often desirable to examine two time series together that are expected to be linked in some way. Specifically, it may be of interest to investigate whether non–stationary frequencies, with a large common power, have a consistent phase relationship, and therefore, if they indicate causality between the time series. The Cross– Wavelet Transform (XWT) is the recommended tool for this purpose (Setoh & Imawaki 1999; Lau & Weng 1999; Veleda et al. 2012). From two Continuous Wavelet Transforms (CWTs), we can also construct the XWT, which indicates at what specific time a particular frequency is more relevant for SST and rainfall time series simultaneously. The coherence analysis is another useful tool to identify relationships between two time series at a particular frequency (Schelter et al. 2007). This analysis was used here to identify the intensity of the correlation between SST and rainfall signals in specific frequency bands. phenomena, varying from intraseasonal to interannual. The time series of SST anomalies at 15°N38°W and 14°S32°W and rainfall anomalies at Bebedouro Meteorological Station are plotted in Figures 2 and 5. Figures 3 and 6 show the cross-correlation between the SST and rainfall time series, while Figures 4 and 7 represent the cross-wavelet spectra between time series, from monthly to interannual scales. The cross-wavelet spectra are represented using a color scale that corresponds to the intensity of the correlation, with the correlation increasing from blue to red. The adopted confidence limit of 95% is represented by black lines covering the region above the confidence limit; it is also represented by a black line on the white background, the so-called Cone of Influence (CI) (Torrence & Compo, 1998). The values below this line are not valid and are subject to great influence of statistical errors. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) The chemical data of the SMSF wines are available from the second harvest of 2008 to the second harvest of 2010. A Principal Component Analysis (PCA) is performed to better understand how the variability of the atmosphere-ocean interaction affects the chemical compounds of wines in the SMSF. The PCA allows quantifying relationships between meteo-oceanographic parameters and chemical compounds of wine. For the PCA, the meteorological data were averaged for each six months corresponding to the respective periods of harvest data. The meteo-oceanographic parameters used in the PCA analysis are: RH, rainfall, MAXT, MINT, MEANT, INS, SST14S (SST at the buoy 14°S32°W) and SST15N (SST at the buoy 15°N38°W). The PCA chemical compounds are: pH, Alcohol, TOT.AC., VOL.AC., FSO2 and TSO2 for the wines described in Table 1. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Correlations among meteo-oceanographic data We applied the cross-correlation, cross-wavelet and coherence analyses to the SST time series of the PIRATA buoys (15°N38°W and 14°S32°W) and the rainfall data. The cross-wavelet analyses presented in Figures 2 to 7 involve time series of monthly averaged SST and rainfall. We find different time scales for Figure 2. Anomalies of SST at 15°N38°W (continuous line) and rainfall at the Bebedouro Meteorological Station (dotted line), Submiddle São Francisco Valley. The cross-correlation between SST at the north tropical Atlantic (15°N38°W) and rainfall at the SMSF exhibits simultaneous negative correlations (cc = - 047) at zero lag (Figure 3), which corresponds to the Atlantic Dipole pattern (Moura & Shukla 1981; Nobre & Shukla 1996). Our results also agree with the findings of Uvo et al. (1998), among others, indicating that the rainfall in Northeast Brazil is positively correlated with SST in the south tropical Atlantic and negatively correlated with SST in the north tropical Atlantic. The XWT analysis shows a dominant annual signal as well as intermittent signals of common power in 2002 and 2004 (Figure 4). It is important to emphasize that the interaction of simultaneous meteorological systems registered in January 2004 were responsible for this anomaly. During this period, the southward ITCZ displacement, the action of HLTCV, the incursion of cold fronts toward the southcentral NEB and the establishment of the SACZ north of its climatological position, increased the persistence of rain at the north-central NEB (Alves et al. 2006). The time series of the SST anomalies at 14°S32°W and the rainfall anomalies at Bebedouro Meteorological Station are plotted in Figure 5. The cross-correlation between SST and rainfall (Figure 6) exhibits a positive Veleda et al. Figure 3: Cross-correlation between monthly averaged time series of SST at 15ºN38ºW (north tropical Atlantic) and Rainfall in Petrolina–PE, Sub-middle São Francisco Valley. Figure 4: Cross-Wavelet Transform (XWT) between monthly averaged time series of SST at 15ºN38ºW (north tropical Atlantic) and Rainfall in Petrolina–PE, Sub-middle São Francisco Valley. Coherence increases from blue to red. Figure 5: Anomalies of SST at 14°S32°W (continuous line) and rainfall at the Bebedouro Meteorological Station (dotted line), Sub-middle São Francisco Valley. Figure 6. Cross-correlation between monthly averaged time series of SST at 14ºS32ºW (south tropical Atlantic) and rainfall in Petrolina–PE, Sub-middle São Francisco Valley. 139 Glob. J. Agric. Res. Rev. 140 Figure 7: Cross-Wavelet Transform (XWT) between monthly averaged time series of SST at 14ºS32ºW (south tropical Atlantic) and Rainfall in Petrolina–PE, Sub-middle São Francisco Valley. Coherence increases from blue to red. Figure 8. Coherence and Phase spectra between SST at 15°N38°W (Left Panels), 14°S32°W (Right Panels) and Rainfall time series in Petrolina–PE, Sub-middle São Francisco Valley. The coherence is considered significant above the threshold/significance level indicated by the dashed lines. correlation (cc = 0.60) between the SST at the 14°S32°W buoy and the rainfall at the SMSF at zero lag. For shorter timescales, the cross-wavelet transform shows welldefined intermittent signals with common power at a 3-4month band (Figure 7). Additionally, the interannual occurrences of common powers in Figure 7 appear in the years 2001, 2002, 2004 and 2009. In fact, some works have confirmed the impacts of interannual rainfall events on grapevines in the SMSF. Leão & da Silva (2005), for example, stated that due to rainfall events, the grapevine cultivar Italia was harvested before reaching its maturity during the production cycle between September 2001 and January 2002 in the SMSF. This excess of rainfall damaged the fruit quality by promoting the reduction of the sugar content in the grapes (averaging 12.4º Brix), with an overall high mean total acidity (1.06%), resulting in a very low ratio between soluble solids and total acidity. Dantas et al. (2007) also studied the climatic impacts on the levels of insoluble and soluble sugars in leaves of Syrah in the SMSF during the phenological cycle in the first semester of 2004. According to these authors, high values of rainfall (above the climatological average) were verified 33 to 70 days after pruning in January 2004. These anomalies in rainfall were associated with lower values of mean and maximum temperatures, radiation and insolation when compared with the climatological data. Due to these abnormal changes, the phenological phase between the onset and early ripening of fruits was longer than usual, and foliar concentrations of reducing and soluble sugars as such starch were lower compared with other cycles. Furthermore, Araujo et al. (2009) indicated that the harvest of the cultivar Tempranillo in the SMSF during the first half of 2009 showed high levels of acidity compared with the same crop of 2008, once more due to the high rainfall in the first half of 2009, resulting in increased acidity. As previously discussed, the SMSF is affected by different meteorological systems operating during roughly the same period of the year, i.e., austral summer. The results presented in Figures 2 to 7 emphasize the intraseasonal response of the rainfall at SMSF to the SST Veleda et al. 141 Table 2: Factor loadings of chemical analysis of wines and meteorological parameters for 2008 to 2010 harvests at Sub-middle São Francisco Valley. PH TOT.AC. VOL.AC. ALCOHOL FSO2 TSO2 RH RAINFALL MINT MAXT MEANT INS. SST14S SST15N F1 -0.051 -0.081 -0.260 -0.381 0.214 0.230 0.775 0.947 0.984 0.706 0.854 -0.880 0.986 -0.842 F2 0.197 0.034 -0.457 0.483 0.836 0.850 -0.486 -0.204 0.136 0.273 0.313 0.012 0.061 0.439 variability associated with meteorological phenomena coming from the North, as in the ITCZ displacement, or from the southern hemisphere, as in the SACZ intrusion. We then used the coherence analysis between the SSTs at 15°N38°W and 14°S32°W and the rainfall, to discern the influence of both processes over the SMSF (Figure 8). The spectra (coherence-squared) between the SST and the rainfall time series are shown in Figures 8 (a) and (b). The corresponding spectral phases are plotted in Figures 8 (c) and (d). The coherence between the SST at 15°N38°W and the rainfall shows an annual dominant signal (Figure 8a) with a negative phase, which means that SST lags rainfall. For the SST at 14°S32°W and the rainfall, the coherence analysis also presents a dominant annual signal (Figure 8b) with a positive phase, indicating that the SST is forcing the atmosphere. Besides the annual forcing, results show coherent interannual signals (north and south) centered on the 2436-month band. At higher frequencies, the coherence between the SST at 15°N38°W and rainfall is confined to a narrow band of frequencies (Figure 8a), while a broader band at 3-4 months is verified for the 14°S32°W SST and rainfall (Figure 8b). This relatively broader band of coherence found for the 14°S32°W data is a clear indication that the contribution of the SST in the South Atlantic to the intraseasonal rainfall variability at the SMSF is stronger. Climate Effect on Chemical Compounds Table 2 shows the factor loadings of variables and observations, which gives the proportion of the variance explained by each component. PC1 and PC2 together accounted for about ~64% of the original variance. The first component (PC1) explained 46.22% of total variance, being affected by MINT (+0.98), RAINFALL (+0.95), MEANT (+0.85), RH F3 0.610 0.367 0.695 -0.491 0.149 0.058 -0.096 -0.128 0.023 0.361 0.170 0.274 0.052 0.033 F4 0.701 -0.699 0.164 0.242 0.177 -0.059 0.124 0.116 -0.028 -0.247 -0.133 -0.160 -0.045 -0.120 (+0.78), MAXT (+0.71), which are positively correlated with SST14S (+0.99) and negatively with INS (-0.88) and SST15N (-0.84). Moreover, the PC2 explained 18.34% of total variance, being influenced by the TSO2 (+0.85), and FSO2 (+0.83) (see Table 2 and Figure 9a,b). The PC3 and PC4 components showed lower contributions to the variance (10.8 and 8.9%, respectively) (Table 2 and Figure 9a, b). The PCA/Biplot (Figure 9a,b) indicates that chemical compounds samples of the second wine harvests (dry seasons) of 2008, 2009 and 2010 were positioned in the negative side of PC1 axis, while the samples obtained during the first harvests (wet seasons) of 2009 and 2010 fell onto the positive side of PC1 axis. The varieties, which fell on the right side of PC1, were the ones with a very strong interaction with the SST, rainfall, humidity and air temperature. In order to evaluate the influence of the meteooceanographic parameters on the harvests during the wet and dry seasons, a PCA was separately applied to the data corresponding to first and second harvests. Figure 10 shows the results for the first harvests in 2009 and 2010, which corresponds to wet seasons at the SMSF. Results indicate that the PC1 explained 65.23% of total variance, illustrating that MINT, MAXT, MEANT, INS are positively correlated with SST14S, SST15N and FSO2, and negatively correlated with RH and rainfall. According to Figure 10, more important contributions of the meteo-oceanographic parameters are associated to FSO2 in PC1. Probably the most striking result is Figure 10 that is the negative correlation found between SST14S and rainfall during two wet harvests, once it is in opposition to previous long-term cross-correlation analysis, as showed in Figs. 6 and 7. This result can be explained by the negative ocean-atmosphere feedback as identified by Chaves & Nobre (2004) and de Almeida et al. (2007). In fact, Glob. J. Agric. Res. Rev. 142 (a) (b) Figure 9: Principal Component Analysis (a) and Biplot (b) of climate and chemical compounds data for the wine harvests 2008-2010, Sub-middle São Francisco Valley. these authors showed that warm SST anomalies are able to intensify the SACZ through the low-level convergence of moisture, shifting it northward. The associated increase of cloudiness, in turn, causes the appearance of cold SST anomalies or the weakening of pre-existing warm SST anomalies through the reduction of the incident shortwave solar radiation. Hence, the intensified SACZ in 2009 could be associated to lower SST in the South Atlantic and higher rainfall in the SMSF. The PC1 in Figure 10 also indicates that the strong rainfall and RH contribute to a reduction of FSO2. The FSO2 plays an important role in preserving wine from oxidation and from some micro-organisms, so a reduction of the FSO2 could contribute to reduce the wine quality. The PC2 explained 15.92% of the total variance during wet harvests, in which the more important contribution is due to the VOL. AC. followed by TSO2 and TOT.AC. The parameters such as PH and ALCOHOL (negatively correlated) are represented in PC3 by 9.7% of the total variance. The factor loadings in Figure 10 also point out a direct correlation between rainfall and RH with all wine samples of the first harvest of 2009 and an anticorrelation with the all wine samples of the first harvest of 2010. This discrepancy between the wet season of 2009 and 2010 is due the occurrence of the extreme rainfall event in 2009. Veleda et al. 143 Figure 10: Principal Component Analysis/Biplot of climate and chemical compounds data for the wet wine harvests of 2008-2010, Sub-middle São Francisco Valley. Figure 11: Principal Component Analysis/Biplot of climate and chemical compounds data for the dry wine harvests of 2008-2010, Sub-middle São Francisco Valley. Figure 11 shows the PCA for the dry seasons periods of 2008, 2009 and 2010. The PC1 explained ~39.4% of total variance. The most important contribution of the meteorological parameters in PC1 is the RH, which is directly correlated with RAINFALL, followed by MAXT and VOL. AC. and, negatively correlated with SST15N, TSO2, ALCOHOL and FSO2. The factor loadings in the PC1 point out that a lower MAXT associated with a lower RH have more influence on the higher TSO2, FSO2, alcohol and VOL. AC., during the dry seasons. The PC2 explained ~35.5% of total variance, in which the most important contributions come from MEANT and INS positively correlated with the second harvest of 2008. However, this harvest was negatively correlated with SST14S and MINT. (Figure 11) CONCLUSIONS The Sub-middle São Francisco Valley (SMSF) is an important grapevine production area in the semiarid region of Northeast Brazil. As far as we know this study represents a first step in focusing the remote influence of Glob. J. Agric. Res. Rev. 144 the ocean-atmosphere mechanisms on the variability of rainfall in the SMSF, a region marked by the alternation of extreme rainfall events and droughts. Results show that the intensity of rainfall in the SMSF is linked to the Sea Surface Temperature (SST) variability in the tropical Atlantic. The in situ SST measurements obtained from two buoys of the Prediction and Research moored Array in the Tropical Atlantic (PIRATA) Project are correlated to the rainfall at the SMSF. Those buoys are located in places that capture the variability of two most important meteorological phenomena acting on climatic changes in the area of study: the displacement of the Intertropical Convergence Zone - ITCZ (15°N38°W PIRATA buoy) and the intrusion of the South Atlantic Convergence Zone - SACZ (14°S32°W PIRATA buoy). We found, for example, that the interannual changes in the rainfall intensity in SMSF are negatively correlated (cc = - 0.47) with the SST in the North tropical Atlantic and are positively correlated (cc = +0.60) with the SST at the South tropical Atlantic. A strong variance in rainfall responds to the interannual SST variability at 14°S32°W. Furthermore, a broader band of coherence between the sea measurements and rainfall exists at the 3-4 month band, indicating that the intraseasonal response of the rainfall in the SMSF is mainly driven by the SST variability in the South tropical Atlantic. The Principal Component Analysis (PCA) stressed differences between wet and dry meteorological seasons on the chemical wine samples produced at Sub-middle São Francisco Valley. For the wet season, PCA indicate different influences for 2009 and 2010 due to extreme rainfall event occurrence in the year of 2009 linked to south Atlantic via SACZ. During this period strong rainfall and high relative humidity at SMSF contributed to reduce Free Sulfur Dioxide (FSO2) in grapes. Otherwise, the dry seasons analysis evidence correlations between high SST in North Atlantic (northward ITCZ displacement), lower rainfall and relative humidity (RH) in SMSF region, resulting in higher Sulfur Dioxide (TSO2, FSO2), alcohol and higher Volatile Acidity (VOL. AC) wines. Results presented here show the connections between remote ocean-atmosphere forcing, rainfall variability and wine quality in the Sub-middle São Francisco Valley. It that sense, real-time ocean PIRATA data appear as a first order indicator for rainfall prediction and wine quality in this important Brazilian wine-producing region. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The INCTAmbTropic – Brazilian National Institute of Science and Technology for Tropical Marine Environments, CNPq/FAPESB Grants, supported this study: 565054/2010-4 and 8936/2011. The first author acknowledges support from CNPq Process 520271/2006-8. R. M. acknowledges support from FACEPE and CNPq Process 303718/2010-2. The authors would like to thank the wavelet software provided by C. Torrence and G. Compo and is available at URL: http://atoc.colorado.edu/research/wavelets/. The authors thank the PIRATA Project, http://www.pmel.noaa.gov/pirata/, for their valuable measurements. REFERENCES Alves JMB, Ferreira FF, Campos JNB, Filho FAS, Souza E, Duran BJ, Servain J, Studart TMC (2006). Mecanismos atmosféricos associados à ocorrência de precipitação intensa sobre o Nordeste do Brasil durante Janeiro/2004. Rev. Bras. Met. 21(1), 56 – 76. Alves JMB, Servain J, Campos JNB (2009). Relationship between ocean climatic variability and rain-fed agriculture in Northeast Brazil. Clim. Res. 38 (3), 225-236. Araujo AJ de B, Diniz BCR, Martins AM, Triches W dos S, Oliveira V de S, Alves LA, Pereira GE (2009). Estudo da evolução da maturação de uvas cultivar Tempranillo em uma condição semi-árida tropical do Nordeste do Brasil. In XII Cong. Latinoamericano de Vitic. y Enol., Montevideo, Uruguai. Barreiro M, P Chang and R Saravanan (2002). Variability of the South Atlantic Convergence Zone simulated by an atmospheric general circulation model. J. Climate 15, 745-763. Bonnardot V, Planchon O, Cautenet S (2005). Sea breeze development under an offshore synoptic wind in the South-Western Cape and implications for the Stellenbosch wine-producing area. Theor. Appl. Climatol. 81, 203 - 218. Bourlès B, Lumpkin R, McPhaden MJ, Hernandez F, Nobre P, Campos E, Yu LS, Planton S, Busalacchi A, Moura AD, Servain J, Trotte J (2008). The PIRATA program: History, accomplishments, and future directions. Bull. Am. Met. Soc. 89 (8), 1111–1125. Caffarra A and Eccel E (2011). Projecting the impacts of climate change on the phenology of grapevine in a mountain area. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 17(1), 52 – 61. Caffarra A and Eccel E (2010). Increasing the robustness of phonological models for Vitis vinifera cv. Chardonnay. Int. J. Biom. 54, 255 – 267. Caprio JM, Quamme HA (2002). Weather conditions associated with grape production in the Okanagan Valley of British Columbia and potential impact of climate change. Can. J. Plant Sci. 755 – 763. Chaves RR and Cavalcanti IFA (2001). Atmospheric circulation features associated with rainfall variability over southern northeast brazil. Mon. Weather Rev. 129, 2614 – 2626. Chaves RR and Nobre P (2004). Interactions Between Sea Surface Temperatures Over the South Atlantic Ocean and the South Atlantic Convergence Zone. Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, 4pp. Chevet JM, Lecocq S, Visser M (2011). Climate, grapevine phenology, wine production, and prices: Pauillac (1800-2009). Am. Econ. Rev. 101(3), 142 – 46. Dantas BF, Ribeiro L de S, Pereira MS (2007). Teor de açúcares solúveis e insolúveis em folhas de videiras, cv. Syrah, em diferentes posições no ramo e épocas do ano. Ver. Bras. Fruticultura 29(1), 042 - 047. o Daubechies I (1992). Ten Lectures on Wavelets. N . 61 in CBMS/NSF, Series in J. Appl. Math., SIAM. Daubechies I (1999). The wavelet transform, time-frequency localization and signal analysis. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 36, 961. Almeida RAF de, Nobre P, Haarsma RJ, Campos EJD (2007). Negative ocean-atmosphere feedback in the South Atlantic Convergence Zone. Geophys. Res. Lett. 34, 1 - 5. Emery WJ and Thomson RE (2001). Data Analysis Methods in Physical Oceanography (Elsevier Science, Amsterdam). Ferreira NJ, Lacava CI, Sobral ZR (2001). A climatological study of convective cloudbands in northeastern Brazil. Part I: preliminary analysis. Aust. Meteorol. Mag. 50, 105 – 113. Frank NL (1970). On the energetics of cold lows. Proceendings of the Symposium on Tropical Meteorology, Am. Met. Soc., EIV I-EIV 6, Jun. Grifoni D, Mancini M, Maracchi G, Orlandini S, Zipoli G (2006). Analysis of Italian wine quality using freely available meteorological information. Am. J. Enol. Vit. 57(3), 339 – 346. Veleda et al. Gu D and Philander SGH (1995). Secular changes of annual interannual variability in the tropics during the past century. J. Climate 8, 864 - 876. Hall A and Jones GV (2008). Effect of potential atmospheric warming on temperature-based indices describing Australian winegrape growing conditions. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 15, 97–119 Hastenrath S (2011). Exploring the climate problems of Brazil’s Nordeste: a review. Clim. Change 112, 243 - 251. Hastenrath S and L Heller (1977). Dynamics of climatic hazards in north-east Brazil. Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc. 110, 411-425. Hastenrath S and A Greischar (1993). Circulation mechanisms related to Northeast Brazil rainfall anomalies. J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos. 98, 5093 - 5102. Jones GV, White MA, Cooper OR, Storchmann K (2005). Climate change and global wine quality. Clim. Change 73, 319 – 343. Kodama,YM (1992). Large-scale common features of sub-tropical precipitation zones (the Baiu Frontal Zone, the SPCZ, and the SACZ). Part I: characteristics of subtropical frontal zones. J. Meteorol. Soc.-JPN 70, 813 - 835. Kousky VE (1988). Pentad Outgoing Longwave Radiation Climatology for the South American Sector. Rev. Bras. Met. 3, 217 – 231. Kousky VE, Chu PS (1978). Fluctuations in annual rainfall for northeast Brazil. J. Meteorol. Soc.-JPN 56, 457 - 465. Kumar P and E Foufoula-Georgiou (1997). Wavelet analysis for geophysical applications. Rev. Geophys. 35, 385. Lau KM and Weng H (1999). Interannual, Interdecadal and Global Warming Signals in Sea Surface Temperature. J. Climate 12, 12571267. Leão PC de S, Cruz CD, Motoike SY (2010). Genetic diversity of a Brazilian wine grape germplasm collection based on morphoagronomic traits. Rev. Bras. Frut. 32, 1164 – 1172. Leão PC de S, da Silva EEG (2005). Eficiência de cianamida hidrogenada, espalhante adesivo e torção de ramos para a quebra de dormência de gemas da videira cv. Itália no Vale do São Francisco. Científica 33(2), 172 – 177. Lenters JD and HK Cook (1995). Simulation and diagnosis of the regional summertime precipitation climatology of South America. J. Climate 8, 2988 - 3005. Liu PC (1994). Wavelet spectrum analysis and ocean Wind waves. In Wavelets in Geophysics, E. Foufoula-Georgiou and P. Kumar, Eds. Academic Press, pp. 151 – 166. Lough JM (1986). Tropical Atlantic sea surface temperatures and rainfall variations in Subsaharan Africa. Mon. Weather Rev. 114, 561 - 570. Mallat S (1998). A wavelet tour of signal processing. Academic Press, New York. NOAA/IRD/INPE/DHN, 2011: PIRATA. Available online at http://www.pmel.noaa.gov/pirata/. Marsden TK, Cavalcanti JSB, Irmão JF (1996). Globalisation, regionalisation and quality: the sócio-economic reconstitution of food in the San Francisco Valley, Brazil. Int. Jrnl. of Soc. of Agr. & Food 5, 85 – 114. McPhaden MJ, K Ando, B Bourlès, HP Freitag, R Lumpkin, Y Masumoto, VSN Murty, P Nobre, M Ravichandran, J Vialard, D Vousden and W Yu (2010). The global tropical moored buoy array. Proceedings of the "OceanObs'09: Sustained Ocean Observations and Information for Society" Conference (Vol. 2), Venice, Italy, pp. 21–25, Hall, J., D.E. Harrison and D Stammer, Eds., ESA Publication WPP-306. Montes C (2010). Analysis of the daily minimum temperatures variability in the Casablanca Valley, Chile. In: VIII Int. Terroir Congress, Soave, Italy. Proceedings. Conegliano, CRA-VIT Centro di Ricerca per la Viticultura. 3, 72 – 77. Morlet J (1981). Sampling theory and wave propagation. Proceedings of st 51 Annual International Meeting Society of Exploration Geophysicists. Los Angeles. Moscati MCL and Gan MA (2007). Rainfall variability in the rainy season of semiarid zone of Northeast Brazil (NEB) and its relation to wind regime. Int. J. Climatol. 27, 493 – 512. Moura AD and J Shukla (1981). On the dynamics of droughts in northeast Brazil: Observations, theory and numerical experiments with a general circulation model. J. Atmos. Sc. 38, 2653 - 2675. 145 Nobre P and J Shukla (1996). Variations of sea surface temperature, wind stress, and rainfall over the tropical Atlantic and South America. J. Climate 9, 2464 - 2479. Nobre P, E Campos, PS Polito, OT Sato and JA Lorenzzetti (2004). PIRATA western extension scientific rational report. Tech. Report, INPE/CPTEC, 43 pp., Cachoeira Paulista, Brazil. Paegle JN and KC Mo (2002). Linkages between Summer Rainfall Variability over South America and Sea Surface Temperature Anomalies. J. Climate 15, 1389 - 1407. Palmer TN (1986). Influence of the Atlantic, Pacific and Indian Oceans on Sahel rainfall. Nature 322, 251 - 253. Parker DE, CK Folland and MN Ward (1988). Sea surface temperature anomaly patterns and prediction of seasonal rainfall in the Sahel region of Africa. Nature 310, 483 - 485. Rabobank Nederland (2005). São Francisco Valley irrigated fruit production: an interesting alternative for new investments. Hirsch, Rodolfo, Org. Nederland. 32 p. http://www.codevasf.gov.br/principal/publicacoes/publicacoestuais/rabobank_saofranciscovalley_hirsch_october2005.pdf/view Ramos MC, Jones GV, Martínez-Casasnovas JA (2008). Structure and trends in climate parameters affecting winegrape production in northeast Spain. Clim. Res. 38, 1 – 15. Ramos RPL (1975). Precipitation Characteristics in the Northeast Brazil Dry Region. J. Geophys. Res. 80(12), 1665 – 1678. Rao VB, de Lima MC, Franchito SH (1993). Seasonal and interannual variations of rainfall over eastern Northeast Brazil. J. Climate 6, 1754 – 1762. Rayne S, Forest K, Friesen KJ (2011). Projected climate change impacts on grape growing in the Okanagan Valley, British Columbia, Canada. Nature Proc. - http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/npre.2011.3162.2. Robertson AW and CR Mechoso (2000). Interannual and Interdecadal Variability of the South Atlantic Convergence Zone. Mon. Weather Rev. 128, 2947 - 2957. Rodrigues RR, Haarsma RJ, Campos EJD, Ambrizzi T (2011). The Impacts of Inter–El Niño Variability on the Tropical Atlantic and Northeast Brazil Climate. J. Climate 24, 3402 – 3422. Salinger MJ, Sivakumar MVK, Motha R (2005). Reducing vulnerability of agriculture and forestry to climate variability and change: workshop summary and recommendations. Clim. Change 70, 341 – 362. Schelter B, Winterhalder M, Timmer J (2007). Phase synchronization and coherence analysis: sensitivity and specificity. Int. J. Bifurcat. Chaos 17(10), 3551 – 3556. SECTI. 2008. Plano de desenvolvimento do APL de fruticultura do Vale do São Francisco – Bahia. Secretaria de Ciência Tecnologia e Inovação. Servain J, AJ Busalacchi, MJ McPhaden, AD Moura and GRMVSE Zebiak (1998). A pilot research moored array in the Tropical Atlantic (PIRATA). Bull. Am. Met. Soc. 79, 2019 – 2031. Setoh T, Imawaki S, Ostrovskii A, Umatani S (1999). Interdecadal variations of ENSO signals and annual cycles revealed by wavelet analysis. J. Oceanog. 55(3), 385 - 394. Soar CJ, Sadras VO, Petrie PR (2008). Climate drivers of red wine quality in four contrasting Australian wine regions. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 14, 78 – 90. Spayd SE, Tarara JM, Mee DL, Ferguson JC (2002). Separation of sunlight and temperature effects on the composition of Vitis vinifera cv. Merlot berries. Am. J. Enol. Vit. 53(3), 171 – 182. Tonietto J and Carbonneau A (2004). A multicriteria climatic classification system for grape-growing regions worldwide. Agr. Forest Meteorol., 124, 81 – 97. Torrence C and GP Compo (1998). A practical guide to wavelet analysis. Bull. Am. Met. Soc. 79, 61 – 78. Uvo, Cintia Bertacchi Carlos A Repelli, Stephen E Zebiak, Yochanan K (1998). The Relationships between Tropical Pacific and Atlantic SST and Northeast Brazil Monthly Precipitation. J. Climate, 11, 551 – 562. Veleda D, Montagne R, Araujo M (2012). Cross-wavelet bias corrected by normalizing scales. J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., doi: 10.1175/JTECHD-11-00140.1.
© Copyright 2024