I Immunizations i ti and d Pregnancy Mark H. Sawyer, MD S Diego San Di Immunization I i ti Partnership P t hi San Diego County Immunization Branch Objectives List vaccines that should be ggiven either duringg pregnancy or immediately postpost-partum Describe the epidemiology of pertussis in women of childbearing age and in infants State the recommendations for the use of Tdap vaccine in and around pregnancy Describe how frequently San Diego women are offered vaccines during or after their pregnancies Describe some of the services available for healthcare providers from the San Diego County Immunization Branch Vaccines OB/GYN Need to Know Primary Importance Tdap: Tetanus, diphtheria, & pertussis Influenza HPV: Human Papillomavirus Secondary Importance MMR: measles, mumps, & rubella Hepatitis p A Hepatitis B Varicella Percent of women who said that any of their medical caregivers recommended d d vaccines i ffor them th att th these th three iintervals. t l 25% 20.9% 22.4% 20% 14.2% 15% 10% 5% 0% n=134 Before Pregnancy g y Duringg Pregnancy g y After Pregnancy g y S:\PHS\Immun\Evaluation\RDD 2008\Childhood IZ Survey 2008\Presentations\Post-Partum Survey Results For those who had immunizations recommended to them: Which vaccines were recommended to you? y Tdap 21.4% 3.3% 15.8% 21.4% Influenza MMR 28.6% 10.0% 5.3% 50 0% 50.0% 47.4% 14 3% 14.3% HPV 3.6% Hep B Varicella 5.3% Not a vaccine* 13.3% Don't remember 6.7% 0% 5% 10% Before Pregnancy 17.9% During Pregnancy 14.3% After Pregnancy 21.1% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% *Other things named: Rogram, TB Skin Test, RH Factor Before Pregnancy: n=28 During Pregnancy: n=30 After Pregnancy: n=19 S:\PHS\Immun\Evaluation\RDD 2008\Childhood IZ Survey 2008\Presentations\Post-Partum Survey Results 45% 50% 55% Percent of women who chose to receive any of the vaccines i if they h were offered. ff d 100% 95.0% 93.8% 80% 61.5% 60% 40% 20% % 0% Before Pregnancy n=20 During Pregnancy n=16 After Pregnancy n=13 S:\PHS\Immun\Evaluation\RDD 2008\Childhood IZ Survey 2008\Presentations\Post-Partum Survey Results Reports of Pertussis in the U.S. 1990--1993 1990 1994--1996 1994 1997--2000 1997 2001--2003 2001 9000 18.8 fold 8000 Averag ge Numb ber of Cas ses / Yea ar 2004 7000 15.5 fold 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 <1 yr 1-4 yrs 5-9 yrs Age Group 10--19 yrs 10 Güriş riş et al. Clin Infect Dis. Dis. 1999;28:12301999;28:1230-1237. CDC. MMWR MMWR.. 2002;51:73 2002;51:73--76, 2001;50(53):1-108, 2002;51(53):1-84, 2003;52(54):1-85 20+ yrs Age Distribution and Incidence of Reported Pertussis Cases - California 2004 4 50 8 0 .0 c a se s 4 00 age-specific ra te s 3 50 7 0 .0 3 00 ca s e s 5 0 .0 2 50 4 0 .0 2 00 3 0 .0 1 50 2 0 .0 1 00 1 0 .0 50 0 California Dept of Health < Services Immunization Branch 0 .0 1 yr 1-9 yrs 1 0 -1 9 yrs 20 + yrs c a se s pe r 1 0 0,0 0 6 0 .0 Common Clinical Manifestations of Ad l AdolescentAdolescent -Adult Ad l Pertussis P i Cough 97% 3 weeks, weeks 52% 9 weeks Paroxysms 3 weeks in 73% Whoop in 69% Post--tussive emesis in 65% Post Teens missed average 5 days of school Adults Ad l missed i d average 7 days d off work Average 14 days of disrupted sleep De Serres et al. J Infect Dis. Dis. 2000;182:174– 2000;182:174–9. Pertussis as a Cause of Prolonged Cough Illness in Adolescents and Adults Locale Years % off Cough C h Illness Nennig et al. San Francisco 1994--1995 1994 12 Strebel et al. Minn.— Minn. —St. Paul 1995--1996 1995 13 Jackson et al. Seattle 1983--1987 1983 15 Jansen et al. San Diego 1993--1994 1993 17 Wright et al. Nashville 1992--1994 1992 21 Los Angeles 1986--1989 1986 26 Chicago 1993--1994 1993 26 Source Mink et al. Rosenthal et al. Senzilet LD et al. (2001), Clin Infect Dis 32(12):1691-1697 How is pertussis diagnosed? Four different tests Culture PCR (polymerase chain reaction) DFA (antigen detection) Serology l Tests lack sensitivity No single test adequate to reliably diagnose pertussis How is pertussis misdiagnosed? B Bronchitis hiti Asthma Gastroesophageal reflux Post--viral bronchospasm Post Chronic sinusitis T b Tuberculosis l i Chlamydia/mycoplasma infection The majority of severe pertussis disease complications occurred among infants 0-2 months of age, California 1995 - 2004 16 15 Death Encephalopathy 14 12 number of casses n 12 10 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 age (months) California Dept of Health Services Immunization Branch Infant Pertussis: Who Was the Source? Bisgard, K. PIDJ. 2004;23:985 2004;23:985--9. n=264 cases Tdap vaccines Two vaccines available Boostrix (approved for ages 1010-64) Adacel Ad l (approved for ages 11 - 64) Licensed in 2005 Both are composed of: Tetanus T toxoid, id reduced d d diphtheria di h h i toxoid, id and acellular pertussis, adsorbed Only one dose required Tdap Vaccines CDC/AAP recommendations d i Routine use at 11 11--12 years of age Replace Td for all ages 1111-64 Special focus on adults in contact with young infants Post-partum women PostConsideration during pregnancy Healthcare workers Parents and siblings Grandparents No defined minimum interval from prior Td Tdap and Pregnancy A clinician may choose to administer Tdap to a pregnant woman in certain circumstances, such as during an outbreak of pertussis in the community Pregnancy is not a contraindication to vaccination with Tdap Source: MMWR 2006;55(RR-17) Pertussis Incidence and Vaccine Use, 1993 – 2004 Canada’s Northwest Territories Expanded component vaccine 12 Averrage Yearrly Case es / 10,00 00 10 Ad l Adolescent t immunization begins 8 6 4 2 0 1993--1996 1993 1997 1997--2000 2001 2001--2002 2003 2003--2004 Time Periods Kandola, K. Abstract in Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2004;15:351. Manuscript in preparation. Month of Peak Influenza Activity United States, 19761976-2006 50 45% 45 40 Pe ercent 35 30 25 19% 20 13% 15 13% 10 5 3% 3% 3% Apr May 0 Nov Dec Jan Source: MMWR 2007;56 (RR-6) Feb Mar Pregnancy and Influenza Vaccine Risk of hospitalization more than 4 times higher than among nonpregnant women Risk of complications comparable to nonpregnant women with high risk medical conditions ACIP recommends vaccination with inactivated i fl influenza vaccine i for f ALL women who h will ill be b pregnant during influenza season Source: MMWR 2007;56 (RR-6) For those who chose to receive any vaccines: Which vaccines did y you receive? 21.1% Tdap 31.6% Influenza 60.6% 62.5% 15.8% 13.3% 12.5% 10.5% MMR HPV 10.5% Hep B V ri ll Varicella Pneumonia 5.3% Before Pregnancy 21.1% 20.0% * Not a vaccine* 12.5% Don't remember 13.3% 12.5% 0% 10% During Pregnancy 21.1% 20% After Pregnancy 30% 40% 50% *Other things named: Rogram, TB Skin Test, RH Factor Before Pregnancy: n=20 During Pregnancy: n=16 After Pregnancy: n=13 S:\PHS\Immun\Evaluation\RDD 2008\Childhood IZ Survey 2008\Presentations\Post-Partum Survey Results 60% 70% Recommendations Screen each patient for vaccination status Immunize women postpost-partum with Tdap and influenza if they need them Provide vaccines at your clinic If unable to provide vaccines, have a referral system in place Immunization Branch Services for Medical Providers Immunization Management Consultancy Immunization Skills Institute Q Quarterly l sessions i ffor Medical M di l A Assistants i Support materials Quality Improvement Survey Practice Assessments In--services with assessment results and interventions In Yellow cards Immunization Summary Sheets Immunization Updates San Diego Immunization Registry Information for Health Health--Care Professionals NNII (www.immunizationinfo.org) VEC (www.vaccine.chop.edu) IAC (www.immunize.org) CDC/NIP (www (www.cdc.gov/nip) cdc gov/nip) AAP (www.aap.org) AAFP (www.aafp.org/) (www aafp org/) IVS (www.vaccinesafety.edu) Vaccine V i P Page (www.vaccines.org) ( i )
© Copyright 2024