Wolfe Research Energy & Power Deep Dive Conference Thad Hill President and CEO, Calpine Corp. March 31, 2015 Safe Harbor Statement Forward-Looking Statements The information contained in this presentation includes certain estimates, projections and other forward-looking information that reflect Calpine’s current views with respect to future events and financial performance. These estimates, projections and other forward-looking information are based on assumptions that Calpine believes, as of the date hereof, are reasonable. Inevitably, there will be differences between such estimates and actual results, and those differences may be material. There can be no assurance that any estimates, projections or forward-looking information will be realized. All such estimates, projections and forward-looking information speak only as of the date hereof. Calpine undertakes no duty to update or revise the information contained herein other than as required by law. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the estimates, projections and other forward-looking information in this presentation as they are based on current expectations and general assumptions and are subject to various risks, uncertainties and other factors, including those set forth in Calpine’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 and in other documents that Calpine files with the SEC. Many of these risks, uncertainties and other factors are beyond Calpine’s control and may cause actual results to differ materially from the views, beliefs and estimates expressed herein. Calpine’s reports and other information filed with the SEC, including the risk factors identified in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014, can be found on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov and on Calpine’s website at www.calpine.com. Reconciliation to U.S. GAAP Financial Information The following presentation includes certain “non-GAAP financial measures” as defined in Regulation G under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Schedules are included herein that reconcile the non-GAAP financial measures included in the following presentation to the most directly comparable financial measures calculated and presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP. 2 Calpine: National Portfolio of Nearly 27,000 MW Geographic Diversity Dispatch Flexibility As of 2/13/2015 • • • • Geographically diversified portfolio: Scale in three most competitive power markets in America Largest operator of combined heat and power (cogeneration) technology in America Largest geothermal power producer in America Featuring one of smallest environmental footprints in America’s power generation sector 3 Nation’s Largest Baseload Renewable, Natural Gas and Cogeneration Power Provider 50 5 SO2 lbs/MWh (Fossil Fleet) Capacity Wtd Avg Age (Years) Clean Modern 40 30 20 10 0 CPN DYN CO2 lbs/MWh (Fossil Fleet) Heat Rate (btu/kwh) 2 1 CPN DYN NRG CPN DYN NRG 2,500 12,000 Our 2013 steam-adjusted heat rate was 7,384 10,000 8,000 6,000 DYN 3 0 NRG Efficient CPN 4 NRG 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 0 Source: Calpine, Energy Velocity (2014). Pro forma adjustments include: CPN – Southeast asset divestiture; DYN – Announced DUK-OH and ECP asset acquisitions; NRG – EME acquisition. Heat rates not adjusted for steam, and excluding non-fossil fuel generation; CPN steam-adjusted heat rate does not include peakers. 4 Calpine Value Drivers Environmental Trends Effective CSAPR 2012 2015 MATS 2012 2015 Regional Haze (TX) 20151 2018 - 2020 Ozone NAAQS 2015 2019+ Clean Power Plan 2015 2020 2 External Factors Reliability Initiatives • Stable financial performance despite gas price volatility Final Rule Adjusted EBITDA ($MM) EPA Rule Shale Gas Economics $2,300 $4.50 $2,000 $4.00 $1,700 $3.50 $1,400 $3.00 $1,100 $2.50 • More renewables = Higher value for flexibility, lower for baseload Market Henry Hub Gas Price ($/mmbtu) ($ millions) Product Eff. Date PJM Capacity Performance May 2016 May 2018 ISO-NE Performance Incentives May 2018 ERCOT $9,000/MWh SWOC Jun 2015 All Price Formation Ongoing $2.00 $800 2009 2010 2011 Adj. EBITDA 2012 2 2013 2014 2015E HH Gas Price CPN Shareholder Value Active Portfolio Management Returning Capital to Shareholders Tilting Mix to Attractive Markets Repurchase total: $2.4B3 (~25% of outstanding shares4) $3.5B $3.2B Annual Repurchases $22.14 Internal Efforts Multiple2 $1,100 $623 $20.07 $463 $17.52 Bought (2010 - Current) Sold (2010 - Current) $14.60 ~6x ~14x 2011 $119 $125 $21.68 2012 2013 2014 2015 YTD 3 1 Anticipated approval for TX FIP. 2 MW-weighted Adj. EBITDA multiple. Includes sale of Osprey (as illustrated by the hashed portion of the bar in the chart above), pending regulatory approvals. 3 As of 2/12/15. 4 Based upon 490.6M shares outstanding as of 6/30/11, immediately prior to announcement of repurchase program. 5 Capital Allocation and Portfolio Management ($ millions, unless otherwise indicated) 2014: Aggressively Deploying Capital Portfolio Transformation 2Q08: ~$3.3B Cash $470 Financings2 $450 ~$3.3B $1,100 Adj. Free Cash Flow1 $1,530 $830 Sources • Amortization • Unsecureds • 4Q Call $290 Growth4 Uses • TX Expansions • Garrison • York 2 Acquisitions4 • Guadalupe • Fore River 77 plants 23.8 GW West 7,246 MW 30% Texas 7,487 MW 32% Sheet3 $690 $1,200 Southeast 6,254 MW 26% Share Repurchase Bal. Asset Sale Proceeds, Net North 2,822 MW 12% Today: East Region North 7,859 MW 30% 87 plants 26.5 GW West 7,524 MW 28% Southeast 1,738 MW 7% Texas 9,427 MW 35% 1 2 3 4 A non-GAAP financial measure. Reconciliations of Adj. FCF to Net Income (Loss), the most comparable U.S. GAAP measure, are available on our website at www.calpine.com. Does not include financing completed in February 2015. Includes fees, premiums and other financing costs associated with debt refinancings. Shown gross of debt financing. 6 Continuing to Reposition the Portfolio Monetizing Non-Core Assets Investing at Attractive Returns Osprey Energy Center Mankato Power Plant Auburndale, FL (FRCC) 599 MW CCGT Mankato, MN (MISO) 375 MW CCGT 345 MW Proposed Expansion • Key terms of agreements — New PPA through Dec 2016 — Plant to be sold Jan 2017 — State / Federal regulatory approvals required • Secured ~$225 million of value from underperforming asset through monetization — $166 million sale proceeds — Balance attributable to net contract value • MPUC Order issued to enter into 20-year PPA; Contract execution forthcoming • Investing at ~$600/kW • COD expected as early as June 2018 Ongoing Growth Projects: Project Region Capacity Status Garrison PJM 309 MW COD projected 2Q15 York 2 PJM 760 MW EPC contract issued; Construction to begin Spring 2015 Strategically managing our footprint, consistent with our focus on competitive wholesale power markets 7 Evolving Markets Continue to Favor Flexible, Reliable Generation like Calpine’s ERCOT Weather-Normalized Economic Reserve Margin1 Three Quick Facts About Our Regions: 16% 12% • Market fundamentals growing tighter… Texas • …Yet, no scarcity in forward curves 8% • Stricter environmental regulations + Low natural gas prices = TX resource mix transformation looks more like PJM 4% 0% 2011 Non-Economic Resources 1,612 MW Removed: 2014 2,644 MW 2015 2,401 MW 2016 2,645 MW • Marcellus-advantaged natural gas prices benefit CCGTs • Potential energy market benefits from 11,000+ MW of announced retirements this year and next $50 $3.50 $40 $3.00 $30 $2.50 $20 $2.00 Natural Gas Price ($/mmbtu) PJM & New England • Capacity market emphasis on reliability = Positive for auction pricing Summer 2015 Spark Spread ($/MWh) Spark Spreads Maintaining Strength2 $1.50 $10 Oct-14 Nov-14 Dec-14 PJM-W On-Peak Spark Spread Jan-15 Tetco M3 Gas Price • Exposure to on-peak solar largely mitigated by contracts, Geysers and NoCal-concentrated fleet California • Incremental solar offers no capacity value • Steep net load requirements from afternoon peak result in CPN capturing higher evening prices ? Day Ahead Heat Rate (mmbtu/kWh, NP-15) Increasing Intraday Volatility3 13 Steepening afternoon ramp 12 11 10 9 8 4Q13 4Q14 7 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Hour Source: Calpine, ERCOT. Calculation based upon available resources as per May 2011, Dec 2013 and Dec 2014 CDR, adjusted to (i) remove non-economic resources dispatched at scarcity pricing (Reserves, ERS, DR), (ii) consistently apply 2011 ELCC for wind of 8.7% across all periods, and (iii) exclude non-seasonally mothballed units. 2 Source: Calpine, Broker data.) 3 Source: CAISO, ICE. 1 8
© Copyright 2024