Evaluation of 60 Patients with Pilonidal Sinus Treated with Laser Epilation after Surgery YASEMIN ORAM, MD, FERAYI KAHRAMAN,y YELDA KARINCAOG˘LU, MD,z AND ERKAN KOYUNCU, MD BACKGROUND The surgical treatments for pilonidal sinus disease often result in recurrences, and the patients risk requiring multiple surgical interventions. OBJECTIVE disease. To evaluate the role of alexandrite laser hair removal after surgery in pilonidal sinus METHODS Sixty patients who underwent surgical treatment of pilonidal sinus disease and were treated with a 755-nm alexandrite laser after surgery between 1999 and 2007 were examined retrospectively. The charts were reviewed, and the patients were interviewed on the telephone about their post-laser period and recurrence. The laser parameters, patient history, and surgical details were recorded. RESULTS The overall recurrence rate was 13.3%, after a mean follow-up period 7 standard error of the mean of 4.8 7 0.3 years. The mean number of laser treatment was 2.7 7 0.1. Seventy-five percent of the recurrences were detected after a follow-up period of 5 to 9 years. Fifty percent of the recurrent cases had drainage and secondary intention before the laser epilation. CONCLUSION Our results strongly suggest that laser hair removal after surgical interventions in pilonidal sinus disease decreases the risk of recurrence over the long term. The authors have indicated no significant interest with commercial supporters. P ilonidal sinus is a debilitating, painful, chronic disease of the natal cleft that involves mainly the sacrococcygeal region. The clinical presentation of the disease varies from asymptomatic pits to painful draining abscesses. The most common manifestation of pilonidal disease is a painful fluctuant mass in the sacrococcygeal region. Treatment options include observation, antibiotics, drainage, and wide excision; surgical therapies often result in high rate of recurrences, and the patients risk requiring repeated surgical interventions.1–4 In recent years, reports of laser epilation in the pilonidal sinus have shown beneficial effect by decreasing the risk of recurrent pilonidal sinus disease.5–11 In this study, we evaluated pilonidal sinus cases treated with alexandrite laser epilation after surgical interventions. METHODS Seventy-eight patients with surgically treated pilonidal sinus were treated with alexandrite laser for hair removal between 1999 and 2007 in a private dermatology unit. In June 2008, the patients were interviewed by telephone about the postlaser period. Exclusion criteria included cases with inadequate information and follow-up and patients who had only one laser treatment. Sixty of the 78 patients were identified and included in the study. The charts were reviewed, and age, sex, family history of pilonidal sinus disease, date of surgery, surgery type, number of laser treatments, laser energy parameters, and whether the pilonidal sinus disease was primary or recurrent were recorded. The laser system protocols and patient characteristics are Dermatology Unit, American Hospital, I˙stanbul, Turkey; yMedical Technician, Private Practice, I˙stanbul, Turkey; z Department of Dermatology, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey & 2009 by the American Society for Dermatologic Surgery, Inc. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. ISSN: 1076-0512 Dermatol Surg 2010;36:88–91 DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2009.01387.x 88 ORAM ET AL TABLE 1. Laser Protocol Specifics Laser System Wavelength (nm) Pulse Duration (ms) Fluence (J/cm2) Spot Size (mm) Treatments, n Post-Surgical Time Interval (Months) Patients, n Cynosure Apogee 5500 Candela Gentlase 755 3 20–27 12–15 2–4 1–2 19 755 3 14–20 18 2–5 1–12 41 shown in Tables 1 and 2. During the telephone interview, patients were asked whether they experienced any recurrence after the laser treatment. A 755-nm alexandrite laser (Apogee 5500, Cynosure Inc., Westford, MA, and Gentlelase, Candela Laser Corp., Wayland, MA) was used. Two of the authors (YO, FK) treated the patients. The number of epilation treatments ranged from two to five performed at 6- to 8-week intervals. The first laser treatment was conducted as early as 4 weeks to as late as 1 year after the surgery. Laser treatments were performed after healing from the surgery was completed. Because the epilation area is non-sun exposed and suitable for higher energies, the fluence and the spot size used were the maximum according to the device guide. The epilation area was not confined to the surgery area but extended to the buttocks, perianal region, and lower back of the patients with large flap reconstruction. RESULTS The age of the patients ranged between 12 and 40, with a mean 7 standard error of the mean of 22.5 7 0.8. Fifty-one of the 60 cases were male (85%), and nine were female (15%). Most (91.7%) of the patients had primary pilonidal disease, whereas 8.3% had recurrent pilonidal disease. Twenty-four patients (40%) had a positive family history of pilonidal sinus disease. Forty-one of the 60 cases (67.2%) had excision and flap reconstruction (E 1 F), 13 (21.7%) had incision and drainage (I 1 D), four (6.7%) had excision and primary closure (E 1 P), and two (3.33%) had excision and secondary intention healing (E 1 S). The mean number of laser treatments was 2.7 7 0.1; all eight recurrent cases had two treatment sessions. The overall recurrence rate was 13.3%, after a mean follow-up period of 4.8 7 0.3 years. All recurrent cases had primary pilonidal sinus disease. TABLE 2. Patient Characteristics Previous Surgery Laser System Cynosure Apogee 5500 Candela Gentlase Total F:M Age (Mean 7 Standard Error of the Mean) Fitzpatrick Skin Type Excision 1 Flap 1:18 23.1 7 1.3 III–IV 11 8:33 22.2 7 1.1 III–IV 60 22.5 7 0.8 III–IV Excision 1 Primary Closure Excision 1 Secondary Intention 7 2 2 30 6 2 F 41 13 4 2 Incision 1 Drainage 3 6 : 1 : J A N U A RY 2 0 1 0 89 PILONIDAL SINUS Twenty-nine cases (48.3%) had a follow-up period of less than 5 years, and 31 cases (51.7%) had more than 5 years of follow-up. Telephone interviews revealed that six of the eight (75%) recurrences occured 5 to 7 years after laser epilation treatments and two (25%) were detected during the first 2 years of the postlaser period. Three of 41 cases in the E 1 F group (7.3%), four of 13 (30.8%) in the I 1 D group, and one of four (25%) in the E 1 P group had recurrences. Of the eight cases with a recurrence after laser epilation, four (50%) had I 1 D, three (37.5%) had E 1 F, and one (12.5%) had E 1 P. DISCUSSION Pilonidal disease is observed most commonly in young adults, with an incidence of 26 per 100,000 population. Men are affected twice as frequently.4 The origin of pilonidal sinus has been a subject of interest for many years. In the 1950s, it was thought to be of congenital origin, involving the remnant of the medullary canal and the infolding of the surface epithelium or a faulty coalescence of the cutaneous covering in the early embryonic stage,1,2 but most authors now believe that the majority of pilonidal disease cases are acquired and the result of a foreign body response to entrapped hair.1,2,5 After the onset of puberty, sex hormones affect the pilosebaceous glands, and the hair follicles become distended with keratin. As a result, a folliculitis is created, which produces edema and follicular occlusion. The infected follicle extends and ruptures into the subcutaneous tissue, forming a pilonidal abscess. This results in a sinus tract that leads to a deep subcutaneous cavity. The laterally communicating sinus overlying the sacrum is created as the pilonidal abscess spontaneously drains to the skin surface.1 Loose hairs are drilled, propelled, and sucked into the pilonidal sinus by friction and movement of the buttocks whenever the patient stands and sits. This trapped hair stimulates a foreign body reaction and infection.1–3 Excess hair in and around the gluteal cleft increases the risk of the occurrence of the disease, and the frequency and 90 D E R M AT O L O G I C S U R G E RY severity of recurrences are directly related to the density of the hair present on the buttocks.5 Longlasting or permanent hair removal in the gluteal area in pilonidal sinus disease would eliminate the hairs and decrease the risk of recurrent disease.9,11 The recurrence rate of pilonidal sinus varies depending on the treatment method and the follow-up period of the study.1–4,12,13 Recurrent pilonidal disease is observed most commonly after the incision and drainage of a pilonidal abscess in which the pilonidal sinus has not been excised and is still present after the abscess cavity heals.13 In this setting, the base of the unhealed surgical wound is believed to become filled with granulation tissue, hair, and skin debris, which acts as a nidus for the ongoing foreign body reaction that takes place to create the recurrent and chronic pilonidal disease. In accordance with this theory, in our study, even with laser epilation, 50% of the patients who developed recurrence in the follow-up period had been treated using I 1 D. Recurrence rates after excision and primary closure may be as high as 38%, although the healing period has been shorter than with E 1 S.1,13 In the present study, the recurrence rate in the E 1 P group decreased to 25% with additional laser epilation. The E 1 F has been shown to provide the best results regarding recurrence risk and healing time. Our study also confirmed that only three of the 41 (7.3%) patients who underwent E 1 F before laser epilation developed recurrence. The recent literature consists of reports on the benefits of laser epilation in pilonidal sinus disease. Benedetto and Lewis5 reported two patients with recalcitrant pilonidal sinus disease treated with an 800-nm diode laser, resulting in long-term relief. Similarly, Lavelle and colleagues6 presented a case of pilonidal sinus disease. They treated the surgical scar site five times with ruby laser for epilation and did not observe recurrence in 6 months. Conroy and colleagues7 reviewed 14 patients who underwent laser hair removal after pilonidal sinus surgery. The mean number of treatments was 3.9, and none of the patients had developed recurrent disease at 1-year ORAM ET AL follow-up. They suggested that laser hair depilation and the personal hygiene of the patient were useful in preventing recurrent pilonidal sinus disease. Schulze and colleagues8 reported that 19 of 23 patients who had laser epilation after surgical interventions and remained in follow-up did not have recurrence or need further surgery. The inadequate follow-up period and small number of patients in these studies make it difficult to derive firm conclusions, but our results and the literature support the beneficial effect of laser epilation as primary treatment or as an adjunct to surgery, even with a small number of laser treatments. All eight recurrent cases in our study had only two laser treatments. Finer and sparser hair regrowth after two laser treatments might explain the recurrences in those cases. Although it has been postulated that a few laser treatments appear to be enough to prevent recurrent pilonidal sinus disease,10 we believe that multiple treatments are needed to remove the maximum number of hairs to achieve better clearance and low risk of recurrence. After telephone interviews with 205 patients, Doll and colleagues12 reported the long-term recurrence rate as 22% after the first pilonidal sinus disease surgery and suggested that the follow-up should be 5 years or longer, because the majority of recurrences occur during the late postoperative interval. In our study, recurrences were also recorded in telephone interviews. Apparently, telephone follow-up in both studies resulted in less reliable data than with direct examination, although we believe that the low recurrence rate in our study (13.3%) is probably due to the laser epilation treatments after surgery. In addition, we agree with the necessity of longer follow-up of the patients, because 75% of the recurrences were detected a minimum of 5 years after the laser treatment. The main goals of the management of pilonidal sinus disease should be determining the ideal medical or surgical treatment, which includes minimal inconvenience to the patient, a short period of hospitalization, and most importantly, a low risk of recurrence. In this study, the recurrence rates for different surgical interventions were found to be comparable with the results of previous studies, but our results strongly suggest that laser hair removal after surgical interventions in pilonidal sinus disease decreases the risk of recurrence in the long term. Laser epilation is simple and quick, without any complications. We recommend laser epilation to every patient with pilonidal sinus disease as an adjunct treatment after the surgical intervention to prevent further surgery. References 1. Nivatvongs S. Pilonidal disease. In: Gordon PH, Nivatvongs S, editors. Principles and Practice of Surgery for the Colon, Rectum, and Anus. New York: Informa Health Care USA Inc.; 2007. p. 235–46. 2. Hull TL, Wu J. Pilonidal disease. Surg Clin North Am 2002;82:1169–85. 3. da Silva JH. Pilonidal cyst: cause and treatment. Dis Colon Rectum 2000;43:1146–56. 4. McCallum IJD, King PM, Bruce J. Healing by primary closure versus open healing after surgery for pilonidal sinus: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2008;336:868–71. 5. Benedetto AV, Lewis AT. Pilonidal sinus disease treated by depilation using an 800 nm diode laser and review of the literature. Dermatol Surg 2005;31:587–91. 6. Lavelle M, Jafri Z, Town G. Recurrent pilonidal sinus treated with epilation using a ruby laser. J Cosmet Laser Ther 2002;4:45–7. 7. Conroy FJ, Kandamany N, Mahaffey PJ. Laser depilation and hygiene: preventing recurrent pilonidal sinus disease. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2008;61:1069–72. 8. Schulze SM, Patel N, Hertzog D, Fares LG. Treatment of pilonidal disease with laser epilation. Am Surg 2006;72:534–7. 9. Sadick NS, Yee-Levin J. Laser and light treatments for pilonidal cysts. Cutis 2006;78:125–8. 10. Downs AMR, Palmer J. Laser hair removal for recurrent pilonidal sinus disease. J Cosmet Laser Ther 2002;4:91. 11. Landa N, Aller O, Landa-Gundin N, et al. Successful treatment of recurrent pilonidal sinus with laser epilation. Dermatol Surg 2005;31:726–8. 12. Doll D, Krueger CM, Schrank S, et al. Timeline of recurrence after primary and secondary pilonidal sinus surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 2007;50:1928–34. 13. Clothier PR, Haywood IR. The natural history of the post anal (pilonidal) sinus. Ann Royal Coll Surg Engl 1984;66:201–3. Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Yasemin Oram, MD, Amerikan Hastanesi, Dermatoloji Bo¨lu¨mu¨, Gu¨zelbahc¸e sokak No. 20, Ni ¸santa ¸si, I˙stanbul, Tu¨rkiye, or e-mail: [email protected] 3 6 : 1 : J A N U A RY 2 0 1 0 91
© Copyright 2024