Information and Software Technology 51 (2009) 1308–1318 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Information and Software Technology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/infsof A strategy-based process for effectively determining system requirements in eCRM development Ing-Long Wu a,*, Ching-Yi Hung b a b Department of Information Management, National Chung Cheng University, 168 University Road, Ming-Hsiung, Chia-Yi 621, Taiwan Chung-Hwa Telecommunication Inc., 21-3 First Section Sin-Yi Road, Taipei, Taiwan a r t i c l e i n f o Article history: Received 15 April 2008 Received in revised form 12 March 2009 Accepted 18 March 2009 Available online 7 April 2009 Keywords: eCRM Relationship marketing Consumer behaviors Requirements engineering a b s t r a c t Customer relationship management (CRM) is an important concept to maintain competitiveness at ecommerce. Thus, many organizations hastily implement eCRM and fail to achieve its goal. CRM concept consists of a number of compound components on product designs, marketing attributes, and consumer behaviors. This requires different approaches from traditional ones in developing eCRM. Requirements engineering is one of the important steps in software development. Without a well-defined requirements specification, developers do not know how to proceed with requirements analysis. This research proposes a strategy-based process for requirements elicitation. This framework contains three steps: define customer strategies, identify consumer and marketing characteristics, and determine system requirements. Prior literature lacks discussing the important role of customer strategies in eCRM development. Empirical findings reveal that this strategy-based view positively improves the performance of requirements elicitation. Ó 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction Business over the Internet presents unprecedented opportunities for building sales and increasing revenue streams by expanding geographical scope, enhancing channel coordination, and improving supply chain efficiency. To be successful at e-commerce, companies have to rethink their business focus. Their business model has to evolve from production-centric to customer-centric. As products have become more commoditized and pricing differences more slight, the great differentiator today is delivering customer value. Customer value is what leads to increased loyalty, sales, and retention rates. Customer relationship management (CRM) is a strategic and management concept in creating customer value [10,27,28]. Basically, the idea of CRM is founded on relationship marketing. Relationship marketing is mainly to build a longterm association, characterized by purposeful cooperation and mutual dependence on social, as well as structural, bonds [41]. Examples of the well-defined frameworks include Neumann [43] and Stone et al. [58], which are based on the assumption of considering a customer’s consumption of products or services through the customer life cycle. Thus, CRM concept involves a number of compound components on product designs, marketing characteristics, and customer behaviors. It is relatively complex and dynamic in nature. Without * Corresponding author. Tel.: +886 5 2720411x34620; fax: +886 5 2721501. E-mail address: [email protected] (I.-L. Wu). 0950-5849/$ - see front matter Ó 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2009.03.004 the support of information technology, in particular, Internet and communication technology, it is difficult for firms to implement CRM practice. The issue of electronic CRM (eCRM) has increasingly become the identification of the success of CRM implementation [11,62]. ECRM is a business and technology discipline that helps firms acquire and retain the most profitable customers while meeting their requirements. With this trend, too many organizations are rushing to implement a website and take a ‘‘build it and they will come” attitude. However, the results were less than what were expected. Estimates of eCRM projects failing to achieve their objectives range from 60% to 80% [26,54,64]. One of the reasons for unsatisfactory outcomes is focusing solely on technological aspect rather than on marketing aspect for the use of marketing personnel [44,65]. As application software has become more complicated and large scale, developing eCRM thus requires the following different approaches from traditional approaches [1] Software requirements engineering is one of the most important phases in software development process [48,50]. Requirements engineering basically consists of the understanding and representation of the problem to be solved and the requirements elicitation for the problem [51,57]. The main purpose lies in defining a well-written requirements specification to effectively manage user requirements [51,57]. This study emphasizes on the issue of requirements engineering in eCRM development and proposes an approach to address this issue. Requirements elicitation requires relatively difficult communication interface to be made, particularly between I.-L. Wu, C.-Y. Hung / Information and Software Technology 51 (2009) 1308–1318 users’ social world and analysts’ technical world. Improving a communication fit between the constraints of the two worlds is fraught with complexity by virtue of the interplay of human, organizational processes, and technical issues. As a developer, it is absolutely critical that we recognize human and organizational aspects in our communication with customers [20,21]. Specifically, requirements elicitation is closely dependent on the understanding of CRM domain in this study. While a successful CRM approach builds on a strategic vision for effectively integrating organizational processes with technologies [35], a strategic view on requirements elicitation can provide a clear picture to predefine the complex process and further, simplify the complexity of requirements elicitation [13,39,49]. Therefore, this research proposes a strategy-based process for effectively determining requirements in eCRM development. The first is to define a well-planned, unique customer strategy for a firm in the market, which conceptually considers its particular customer needs and marketing objectives, to further direct CRM practice [12,54]. Next, the fundamental to customer strategies requires further understanding consumer and marketing stimuli in order to analyze CRM practice [8,11]. Accordingly, user requirements in eCRM development can be effectively determined based on the previous analyses. In summary, this planning process comprises three steps: define customer strategies, identify consumer and marketing characteristics, and determine system requirements. Little research has discussed the important role of customer strategies in eCRM development. Moreover, prior literature on this implementation process has only reported partially of these steps rather than integratively. In addition, the techniques used for analyzing these steps are also discussed. Finally, this framework is empirically examined to understand the practical validity. 2. Literature review 2.1. CRM and eCRM The new Internet Economy presents numerous challenges to marketers along with the significant opportunities it offers. Customers are smart, powerful, and highly informed. Customers are demanding that every interaction a company has with them leave them more than satisfied. Customer satisfaction is therefore considered as the most important and new performance metric, soon to rival revenue and profit [46]. Today, any advantage based on product or service is short lived. Instead, forging long-term relationships with customers is the key to stability in an increasingly dynamic market [36,45]. This implies that traditional marketing approach no longer fulfills the needs of the Internet era. Although CRM is a recent concept, its tenets have been around for some time. Similarly, the concept of mass customization has been in the literature for nearly a decade [15]. The original focus of CRM is to forge closer and deeper relationships with customers, ‘‘being willing and able to change your behavior toward an individual customer based on what the customer tells you and what else you know about the customer” [8]. The premise is that existing customers are more profitable than new customers; that it is less expensive to sell an incremental product to existing customers; and that customer retention would be maximized by matching products and levels of services more closely to customer expectation. The central objective of CRM is thus to maximize the lifetime value of a customer to the organization [8,47,62]. However, all have remained essentially theoretical concepts, aspirations rather than a practical or commercial reality. It has been very difficult for firms to develop eCRM due to the complex- 1309 ity of CRM process. The great advancement in information technologies recently has provided tremendous resources for facilitating the fulfillment of eCRM. Information technologies such as database, data warehouse, and data mining allow companies to track and manage customer profitability, behavior, and satisfaction at a reasonable cost [6]. Moreover, the fast growing Internet network and communication technologies provide services such as e-mail, online interaction, and personal website to become an important resource for a company to achieve one-on-one relationship, customer value analysis, and mass customization [15,63]. A joint study by the Economist Intelligence Unit and Andersen Consulting in the year 2005 investigated eCRM deployment at more than 200 companies worldwide [33]. They argued that companies have identified the need to break down geographical, functional, and organizational barriers to customer information and interactions. For the next five years, the percentage of the companies organized around the issues of customer segmentation and profitability analysis is expected to increase by more than 170%. Seventy percent of the companies plan to make major changes in the design of their eCRM development process, focusing on overall outcomes as opposed to individual tasks. This implies that the design of eCRM should be approached from a strategic perspective. 2.2. Relationship Marketing and its strategies The underlying determinants of CRM are basically from the discipline of relationship marketing [19,42]. Relationship marketing is a common term with different definitions. Stone et al. [58] defined it as the use of a wide range of approaches, including marketing, sales, communication, service, and customer care, to identify a company’s named individual customers, to create a relationship between the company and its customers which stretches over many transactions, and to manage the relationship in order to benefit the company and its customers. Relationship is how to find customers, get to know customers, keep in touch with customers, and ensure what customers want from the company in every aspect [47]. Thus, relationship marketing needs further elaboration for a sound theoretical base in developing eCRM. Perhaps, the earliest model for analyzing relationship marketing can be traced to the customer resource life cycle (CRLC) model proposed by Ives and Learmonth [24]. The CRLC focuses on the relationship or linkage between a company and its customers. This framework is based on four stages: requirements, acquisition, stewardship, and retirement, each comprising several steps. The assumption is that a customer’s consumption of products and services (resources) goes through this life cycle. It provides managers with customer’s perspective in evaluating strategic potentials of IT applications to achieve competitive advantage. The development of buyer–seller relationship is mapped out in a five-phase model: awareness, exploration, expansion, commitment, and dissolution [46]. Within such a framework, one might easily characterize a marketing relationship as a marriage between a seller and a buyer (the dissolution phase being a ‘‘divorce”). The use of the marriage metaphor emphasizes the complexity as well as some affective determinants of the quality of a relationship. This process takes place in the long run, results in some bilateral benefits, and rests on an in-depth understanding of customer needs and characteristics. Stone et al. [58] summarized the relationship as a series of stages to help companies plan the use of IT in managing their customers. These stages are: recruitment, welcoming, getting to know, account management, intensive care, potential divorce, divorce, and winback. Companies can employ this model to identify which customers to acquire, retain, and which to discourage as well as to 1310 I.-L. Wu, C.-Y. Hung / Information and Software Technology 51 (2009) 1308–1318 further develop marketing, service and IT policies to create the right relationships with different types of customers. While CRM is conceived as a strategy for an organization deciding to build long-term relationship with customers [12,54,64], there is a need to provide some guidance for defining relationship strategies in order to carry out CRM practice. Furthermore, these defined strategies will facilitate an understanding of CRM domain and in turn, eCRM development. Based on a comprehensive literature review, three similar models have been proposed to define customer relationship strategies in e-commerce [8,25,62]. The first defined three stages: acquisition, enhancement, and retention [25]. Each has a different impact on the customer relationship and each can more closely tie the company to the customer’s life and value. (1) Acquiring new customer. You acquire new customers by promoting product and service leadership that pushes performance boundaries with respect to convenience and innovation. The value proposition to the customer is the offer of a superior product backed by excellent service. (2) Enhancing profitability of existing customers. You enhance the relationship by encouraging excellence in cross-selling and up-selling. This deepens the customer relationship. The value proposition to the customer is an offer of greater convenience at low cost (one-stop shopping). (3) Retaining profitable customers for life. Retention focuses on service adaptability – delivering not what the market wants, but what customers want. The value proposition to the customer is an offer of a proactive relationship that works in his or her best interest. The second investigated 1500 organizations to understand what is the pinnacle of customer care to which most organizations should aspire [8]. All organizations seem to fall within one of three distinct stages of customer care: customer acquisition, customer retention, and strategic customer care. The descriptions of stage I and stage II are similar to those of Kalakota and Robinson’s model [25]. Stage III organizations recognize that customer relationships that are in essence strategic partnerships allow them to increase own benefits by focusing on enhancing the customer’s profits. Finally, Gartner Group described a relationship marketing model similar to Brown’s discussion [60]. It divides customer interaction into four categories. These are customer selection, customer acquisition, customer retention, and customer extension. The descriptions of these stages and their relationships are shown in Fig. 1. In the next section on theoretical model development, we will make a summary from these three models for defining the types of customer strategies adopted in this study. 2.3. Consumer behaviors As discussed previously, customer strategies are defined as a high-level concept, and consumer behaviors consist of the basis of the concept and have a profound impact on the way that eCRM is developed. At this time, we need to discuss the concept of consumer behaviors [8,11]. Market researchers have been trying for decades to understand consumer behaviors. Schiffman and Kanuk [52] comprehensively discussed six models of consumer behaviors: the Nicosia model [4], the Howard–Sheth model [23], the Engel–Kollat–Blackwell model [17], the Sheth family decisionmaking model [55], the Bettman information-processing model [5], and the Sheth–Newman–Gross model [56]. These models are basically defined in terms of input–process–output structure. The input component consists of two sets of stimulus characteristics, consumer and marketing characteristics. The process component deals with the search for the relevant information and evaluation "What criteria determines who will be our most profitable customers?" Customer Acquistion Customer Selection Relationship Marketing "How can we increase the loyalty and the profitability of this customer?" Customer Extension "How can we acquire this customer in the most efficient and effective way?" Customer Retention "How can we keep this customer for as long as possible?" Fig. 1. Relationship marketing model (adapted from Turban et al. [62]). Personal Characteristics External Characteristics Age, Gender, Income, Education, Lifestyle, Psychological, Occupation, Values, Personality, Marital Social, Community, Family Stimuli Marketing Price Promotion Product Quality Environmental Economical Technology Political Cultural Buyers' Decisions Decision Making Process Buy or Not What to Buy Where(Vendor) When How Much to spend Repeat Purchases Vendors' Controlled Systems Logistic Technical Customer Support Support Service Payments, Web Design, FAQ, Delivery Intelligent E-Mail, Agents Call Centers, One-to-One Fig. 2. Consumer behavior model of e-commerce (adapted from Turban et al. [62]). of the firm’s brand in comparison with alternative brands. The output component describes that the consumer’s motivation toward the firm’s brand results in purchase of the brand from a specific retailer (decision making). Moreover, a model of buyer behavior indicates a similar stimulus–response structure [32]. This model illustrates marketing and environmental stimuli entering buyer’s ‘‘black box” and producing buyer’s responses. In comparison with the previous models, an exception to this model is that buyer’s characteristics are defined as part of buyer’s black box, rather than as outside stimuli. In addition, a consumer behavior model in e-commerce describes marketing stimuli, personal characteristics, external characteristics, and vendors’ controlled systems entering decision-making process and producing buyers’ decisions, as indicated in Fig. 2 [62]. This model includes an additional set of vendors’ controlled systems as compared with the previous models. Basically, this component plays a technological and supporting role for the other three components in e-commerce environment. 2.4. IT planning and requirements engineering The main reason for application software not meeting user expectation is the failure to obtain a complete and correct set of user requirements in development [22]. Software requirements engineering concerns all the activities, including understanding of the problem, analysis of user requirements, documentation of the requirements as a specification, and validation of the documented requirements against the actual users’ needs [51,57]. In essence, it involves an understanding of the specific problem and its I.-L. Wu, C.-Y. Hung / Information and Software Technology 51 (2009) 1308–1318 context in which the requirements are embedded. Specifically, it needs to construct a clear, high level specification of the problem that is to be solved. Accordingly, requirements elicitation, as part of the requirements engineering, can be started for modeling, gathering and extracting information about required functionality, data, and interface of a proposed system by system developers [14,20,34]. This will ensure that a solution is being developed for the problem and that the solution is feasible. More importantly, a good requirements engineering approach is able to build a common vision of the problem and the conceptualized system solution between users and developers [50,51]. Previous research has presented a large number of approaches to effectively manage requirements elicitation. Most of the approaches are from methodology-oriented rather than from organization-oriented perspective, such as content management, use case based, scenario, and classification [3,31,38,57]. For example, classification approach is mainly used for effectively developing complicated software while most requirements in larger projects are obtained from various stakeholders located in wide and different regions [31]. The initial requirements analysis must be classified by various topics prior to analysis phase in order to be usable as input for regular requirements analysis methods. Other approaches have discussed the importance of communication-related methods, such as viewpoint-oriented requirements definition [2,14]. This technique allows structuring of requirements in terms of different viewpoints and defining detailed requirements specifications. Basically, the reasons for difficulties in requirements determination can be summarized from relevant literatures [3,14,16,31] as follows: (1) cognitive issues resulting from constraints on humans as information processors and problem solvers; (2) problem unstructuring issues resulting from the variety and complexity of information requirements; (3) communication issues resulting from the complex patterns of interaction among users and analysts in defining requirements; and (4) political and behavioral issues resulting from unwillingness of some users to provide requirements. Problem structuring issues are the most apparent to system analysts in defining requirements [2,3,57,59]. While CRM domain is with complex structure, as indicated above, this research intends to alleviate the impact of problem unstructuring issues and finds a new approach in effectively defining requirements for eCRM development. Prior literature has proposed a number of models for the development of information system plan (ISP) and information architecture. These models are mainly based on understanding the problems of requirements analysis in system development. A three-stage model for ISP suggests that a strategic alignment effort as the first stage should precede organizational information requirements as the second stage and resource allocation as the third stage [7]. The stimulus for ISP is typically an organizational problem [9,37]. The problem may be effectively analyzed in terms of an organizational structure with certain hierarchical levels, e.g., organizational strategies at the top, business processes at the second, tasks at the third, and information at the bottom [9,37]. In summary, these models indicate an important fact that an effective approach for defining requirements should be rooted at appropriate choice of strategies. The hierarchical structure may lay a foundation on developing a strategy-based process for effectively eliciting requirements. Many researchers have proposed similar strategy-based concepts for helping requirements elicitation [29,40,51]. 3. Theoretical framework As discussed in Sections 2.2–2.4, while problem domain is unstructural in nature, this approach to effectively define user 1311 requirements should be based on the thinking of a hierarchical organizational structure, such as organizational strategies at the top, tasks at the next, and information at the bottom [7,9,34,37]. Moreover, eCRM domain is essentially complex in nature and its scope is difficult to be defined for determining requirements. Much research has argued that eCRM concept is not simply a software application but is a strategy. It concerns the creation of stakeholders’ values through the understanding of market changes and the building of long-term relationships with key customers and customer segments [11,12,54,64]. While considering both eCRM domain with a strategy focus and a hierarchical structure for defining requirements, an approach can be made for developing a strategy-based process for defining requirements based on customer strategies. In conclusion, this research thus proposes a customer strategy-based process for defining requirements in eCRM development, as indicated in Fig. 3. It consists of three steps: define customer strategy, identify customer and marketing characteristics, and determine system requirements. Little research has discussed the important role of customer strategies in requirements elicitation for eCRM development. The following first defines the three steps based on prior literature and then, develops hypotheses. As discussed in Section 2.2, there are three similar models defined for customer strategies, i.e., Kalakota and Robinson [25], Brown [8], and Turban et al. [62]. All the three models generally involve a marketing cycle of the relationship building between companies and customers. Comparatively, Brown’s model basically covers the primary features of the other models, adopted to define customer strategies in this step, i.e., customer acquisition, customer retention, and strategic customer care. This model also indicates that achieving all three stages well is a difficult proposition, even for the best of companies. The reason for this may be because it is difficult for companies to compete well in wider customer strategies in terms of resource limitation. Companies often have to choose which one of these dimensions will be their primary focus and have to master very well. The decision is important because it will dictate the infrastructure strategy of technology [8]. As discussed in Section 2.3, both input–process–output and stimulus– response structures in defining consumer behaviors commonly describe the input component as consumer/personal and marketing/environmental characteristics [32,62,65]. There are two sets of stimulus characteristics in defining consumer behaviors, i.e., consumer and marketing characteristics. For determining requirements, there is a need to assess its performance to understand whether it is executed satisfactorily. A study has widely defined a measurement system to include five items: accuracy and free bias, completeness, time reduction in performing requirements Define customer strategies Identify consumer & marketing characteristics Determine system requirements Fig. 3. Theoretical framework. 1312 I.-L. Wu, C.-Y. Hung / Information and Software Technology 51 (2009) 1308–1318 determination, usefulness of output information, and ease of use in output information [61]. Next, hypothetical linkages are developed for the research framework. Many studies have discussed the importance of customer strategies in directing the process of developing and implementing eCRM [12,40]. Furthermore, while a new type of customer relationship is well developed based on customer strategies for a firm, the fundamentals to the particular relationship are hereafter identified, i.e., consumer behaviors [13,48]. Another study defines CRM as an integrated customer strategy to effectively manage customers by providing customized products and maximizing customers’ lifetime values [30]. This also indicates the relationship between customer strategies and consumer behaviors. Accordingly, we can argue that there is a linkage between customer strategies and consumer behaviors. While there are two sets of stimulus attributes, consumer and marketing characteristics, Hypotheses 1 and 2 are thus developed for the two relationships. While eCRM has been replete with high failure rate, mainly failing to meet CRM objectives, user requirements should be defined in terms of their strategies and consumer behaviors [49,64]. As a result, user requirements can be effectively elicited while consumer behaviors are well predicted in advance. Accordingly, we can argue that there is a linkage between consumer behaviors and requirements elicitation. Hypotheses 3 and 4 are thus developed for the two relationships. H1: The choice of customer strategies is positively related to the identification of consumer characteristics. H2: The choice of customer strategies is positively related to the identification of marketing stimuli. H3: The identification of consumer characteristics is positively related to the performance of requirements elicitation. H4: The identification of marketing stimuli is positively related to the performance of requirements elicitation. 4. Research design A survey is used to collect empirical data. The design of research is described as below. 4.1. Instrument The instrument contains a four-part questionnaire as indicated in Appendix A. The first part uses a nominal scale, while the rest use 7-point Likert scales. 4.1.1. Basic information Here, information is collected about the organizational characteristics including industry, annual revenue, number of employees, and experience of eCRM, together with the respondent’s characteristics including education, age, experience, and position. 4.1.2. Customer strategy This part is adapted from a self-assessing instrument for defining customer strategies of a firm [8], comprising 12 items in all. Basically, the measure includes example attributes such as Internet applications, differentiated services, customer segmentation, and customers’ profitability in order to discriminate the adoption of customer strategies in a firm. 4.1.3. Consumer and marketing characteristics This part is adapted from two constructs in Turban et al. [62], as indicated in Fig. 2, including 10 attributes for consumer characteristics: age, gender, income, education, lifestyle, psychological state, occupation, values, personality, and marital as well as 4 attributes for marketing stimuli: price, promotion, quality, and product. 4.1.4. Performance of requirements elicitation This part is adapted from the instrument for assessing requirements elicitation [61]. Basically, the measure includes five items: accuracy and free bias, completeness, time reduction in performing requirements determination, usefulness of output information, and ease of use in output information. 4.2. Sample design Since this study mainly explores the development of eCRM, the focus is on B2C commerce for analysing consumer purchasing behavior. Service, and finance and banking industries would have more experience on this. Moreover, the qualified firms would need to have experience on strategic planning and massive IT investment. It is assumed that larger firms would be more likely to have this experience. A study sample, including 645 service firms and 200 finance and banking firms, was thus selected from the year 2006 listing of service, and finance and banking sectors published by the Taiwan Stock Exchange Corporation. Based on this sample, CIOs or IS top managers were selected as the respondents. This is because this study focuses on the understanding of eCRM development and involves the analysis of customer strategies. Therefore, CIOs are more likely to be the managerial personnel who have best knowledge regarding all these topics. Their experiences should be properly reflected on the responses of the questionnaire. In addition, in order to improve survey return, a follow-up procedure by phone or letter is carried out for the non-respondents after 2–3 weeks. Initially, pretest was conducted for the scale. The scale was carefully examined by selected practitioners and academicians in this area, including translation, wording, structure, and content. Content validity of the scale should be acceptable. After the questionnaire was finalized, 159 replied, with 4 incomplete responses deleted, resulting in a total sample of 155 respondents for an 18% response rate. The responding sample contains 115 service firms (74.2%) and 40 finance and banking firms (25.8%). The sector distribution of the responding firms is approximately similar to that of the sample frame. The seemingly low response rate raises the concern about non-response bias. To check non-response bias, the responding sample was divided into two subsamples, i.e., early and late subsamples with 100 and 55 respondents, respectively. The two groups were compared on various demographic characteristics for their correlation with t-test, including annual revenue, number of employees, and experience. All of them (t value = 1.21, 1.56, and 1.84) reveal no significant differences at 0.05 level. This indicates no systematic non-response bias for the responding sample. Accordingly, we can infer that the responding sample is well representative of the sample frame. 4.3. Scale validation Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to analyze scale validation, as described below. Firstly, a measurement model should be assessed for a goodness-of-fit. The literature suggested that, for a goodness-of-fit, chi-square/degrees of freedom (v2/df) should be less than 3, adjusted goodness-of-fit index (AGFI) larger than 0.8, goodness-of-fit index (GFI), normed fit index (NFI), and non-normed fit index (NNFI) greater than 0.9, and root mean square error (RMSE) less than 0.10 [21,53]. Secondly, two criteria are used for scale validation, reliability and construct validity. Reliability is the extent to which a measuring device yields the same result on repeated trials. Without the agreement of yielding consistent results from measuring device, researchers would be unable to satisfactorily draw conclusions, formulate theories, or make claims about the generalizability of their research. Construct validity seeks an agreement between a theoretical concept and a 1313 I.-L. Wu, C.-Y. Hung / Information and Software Technology 51 (2009) 1308–1318 Table 1 Reliability and validity. Construct Item loading Composite reliability AVE Squared correlation Cs Cc Customer strategy Consumer characteristics Marketing stimuli Performance of requirements elicitation 0.85–0.88 0.77–0.83 0.92 0.83 0.82 0.71 – 0.38 – 0.82–0.84 0.88–0.90 0.87 0.93 0.76 0.85 0.32 0.39 0.40 0.38 Ms Pe – 0.38 – Consumer strategy (Cs), consumer characteristics (Cc), marketing stimuli (Ms), performance of requirements elicitation (Pe). specific measuring device. Construct validity is further divided into two sub-categories: convergent validity and discriminant validity. Convergent validity is the actual general agreement among ratings of measuring indicators where measures should be theoretically related. Discriminant validity is the lack of a relationship among measures where they should not be theoretically related. Reliability is evaluated by the index of composite reliability. Convergent validity is assessed by three criteria, item loading (k) for an item at least 0.7 and significance, composite reliability at least 0.8, and average variance extracted (AVE) for a construct larger than 0.5 [18]. Finally, discriminant validity is assessed by the measure that AVE for a construct should be larger than the squared correlation between the construct and other constructs. The testing results of the measurement model indicate all the indicators above the criteria and consequently, a goodness-of-fit model. The indicators for reliabilities and validities are reported in Table 1. Item loadings are all greater than 0.7, composite reliabilities are all larger than 0.8, and average variances extracted (AVE) are all higher than 0.5. Thus, reliabilities and convergent validities are all above the criteria. Moreover, AVEs for a construct are all larger than the squared correlation between the construct and other constructs. Discriminant validities are in an acceptable level. 5. Analysis and findings This section proceeds with the sequence of the three steps in this framework. 5.1. Define customer strategies An exploratory analysis first verifies Brown’s model by empirical data. Cluster analysis with hierarchical and nonhierarchical procedures in combination is used to group the sample firms based on the 12 variables, as defined in customer strategies questionnaire. The hierarchical procedure with Ward’s algorithm first identifies the appropriate number of clusters and nonhierarchical procedure with K-means further adjusts or fine-tunes the results Table 2 Validation results from discriminant analysis. Discriminant analysis Cluster analysis Cluster 1 Cluster 2 Cluster 3 Cluster 1 Cluster 2 Cluster 3 19 (93.9%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 67 (94.7%) 0 (0%) 1 (6.1%) 3 (5.3%) 65 (100%) from the hierarchical procedure. The analysis finally suggests that three-cluster solution is the appropriate choice, with cluster sizes of 20, 70, 65 firms for clusters 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Furthermore, discriminant analysis is used to validate the solution, as indicated in Table 2. This indicates 97.4% of clustered firms correctly classified. Next, while Brown’s model theoretically argues defining the three stages of customer strategies in terms of their relative size on these variables, Scheffe method for multiple comparisons among the three clusters reveals clusters 2, 3, and 1 in an ascending order for most of these variables. Clusters 2, 3, and 1 can be reasonably identified as the strategies of customer acquisition (45.2%), customer retention (41.9%), and strategic customer care (12.9%), respectively. From the percentage distribution, some facts can be discussed for practice. There are almost half of the sample firms considering customer acquisition as their major customer strategies. Obviously, traditional marketing approach is still playing the important role while CRM approach is currently in the early stage for most firms in Taiwan. Nevertheless, the adoption of the other two strategies adds up to occupy a high percentage (54.8%). This implies that a trend of moving toward CRM approach is under developing as the Internet has increasingly played more important role in supporting the business activities of customer retention and strategic customer care. In particular, the firms adopting the middle stage of retention strategy would begin separating customers into different categories using the information collected in the initial stage of acquisition strategy and gradually establish a strong customer base. More specifically, only 12.9% of the sample firms are in the final stage of strategic customer care. The firms in this stage have built the relationships of strategic partnership with customers. However, customers are smart, sophisticated, and highly informed for demanding good quality of products in the Internet era. Building partnership relationship with customers may require an extended time and much effort to achieve [47]. 5.2. Identify consumer and marketing characteristics The first discusses the relationship between customer strategies and consumer characteristics. Their relationship can be defined in terms of consumer characteristics as 10 dependent variables and in terms of customer strategies as one independent variable with three levels/stages. Moreover, dependent variables are of metric attributes and independent variable is of non-metric attribute. MANOVA is used to analyze this relationship structure. The testing results show that Wilks’ k = 0.72, and equivalent F = 20.45 and p < 0.01. Thus, Hypothesis 1 is accepted. More specifically, univariate F statistics are further examined to understand the relative Table 3 Univariate tests for consumer attributes across customer strategies. Consumer characteristics F P-value Age Gender Income Education Lifestyle Psychological Occupation Values Personality Marital 7.83 6.43 13.23 10.12 5.12 7.34 6.64 6.38 9.23 5.89 0.012* 0.031* 0.000* 0.001* 0.041* 0.071 0.029* 0.033* 0.009* 0.064 Customer strategies 1 2 3 3.58 2.84 4.98* 3.21 2.31 3.03 2.96 3.01 3.18 3.11 5.01* 5.16* 5.69* 4.82* 3.84 3.31 5.39* 3.68 5.23* 3.70 5.93* 5.26* 6.43* 6.25* 4.51* 4.01 6.23* 5.23* 5.41* 4.01 Group mean differences 3>1*; 2>1* 3>1*; 2>1* 3>1* 3>1, 2*; 2>1* 3>1* 3>1*; 2>1* 3>1, 2* 3>1*; 2>1* – 1: customer acquisition; 2: customer retention; 3: strategic customer care. * P < 0.05. 1314 I.-L. Wu, C.-Y. Hung / Information and Software Technology 51 (2009) 1308–1318 importance of the ten consumer characteristics across the three customer strategies, as indicated in Table 3. Eight of them reveal significant differences across the three customer strategies and two of them do not. In general, this implies certain facts for practitioners. While the eight consumer attributes are more important in supporting customer strategies for CRM practice, requirements analysis for eCRM development should place more emphasis on understanding these consumer attributes in order to effectively reach the goal. Besides, eCRM development requires massive resources while it involves wide and complex components. However, organizational resources for competitive business activities are limited for calling for effective management. Consumer characteristics such as psychological state and marital status are not significant in building customer relationships and may be ignored in the consideration of their impact on requirements elicitation. In summary, the quality of system development can be substantially achieved while at the same time, a lower developing cost can be maintained. Next, while examining group mean differences among three customer strategies for each of consumer characteristics given in Table 3, a pattern that acquisition strategy is the least significant in identifying most consumer characteristics for building customer relationships is indicated. This may be because this strategy mainly focuses on expanding new customers rather than on exploring existing customers. Thus, customer information required for this strategy may be relatively preliminary such as customer name, telephone number, and address. As the firms move to customer retention, the focus shifts to customer-centered and customers are initially considered as the important asset of the firms. Differentiated services for customers are critical to sustaining their profits. Hence, consumer characteristics, such as age, gender, income, education, occupation, and personality, are the important information to develop customer relationships. For the firms evolving to strategic customer care, the focus is on identifying the most profitable customers and on further developing differentiated services for them. The objective of this strategy is to try to achieve one-to-one customer relationships. As a result, most consumer characteristics, except for psychological state and marital status, are significantly impacted by this strategy. In summary, while looking at the fourth, fifth, and sixth columns for different customer strategies given in Table 3, there are one (income), six, and eight consumer characteristics which indicate significances for the different impacts of the strategies of acquisition, retention, and strategic customer care. While CRM is conceived as a high level of strategic concept and eCRM is development accordingly, this would provide insight for clearly predefining the particular scope of user requirements in eCRM development. Accordingly, the requirements elicitation process would be run in a smooth manner. The second discusses the effect of customer strategies on marketing stimuli. Their relationship comprises marketing stimuli as four dependent variables and customer strategies as one indepen- dent variable with three levels/stages. Moreover, dependent variables are of metric attributes and independent variable is of nonmetric attribute. MANOVA is used to analyze the type of relationship structure. The testing results show that Wilks’ k = 0.52, and equivalent F = 11.45 and p < 0.01. As a result, Hypothesis 2 is accepted. More specifically, univariate F statistics are further examined to understand the relative importance of the four marketing stimuli across the three customer strategies. They are all significant differences, as indicated in Table 4. In general, this implies that requirements analysis for marketing components should be limited on the four stimuli regardless of the choice of customer strategies. Next, while examining group mean differences among three customer strategies for each of the marketing stimuli given in Table 4, a different pattern from consumer characteristics that acquisition strategy plays the most significant role in identifying marketing stimuli for building customer relationships is indicated. This is because this strategy is primarily at expanding new customers for a wider customer base and thus, the focus is on product attributes for attracting new customers. The four marketing stimuli are basically defined in terms of the product attributes. While customer strategies evolve to latter stages, the correlation with the four attributes becomes weaker and weaker. For example, there are four, two, and one marketing attributes which indicate significances for the different impacts of the three customer strategies, as indicated in Table 4. As indicated above, CRM is conceived as a high level of strategic concept and accordingly, eCRM development does. The findings have the important implications in requirements analysis. This will help system analysts to more clearly define the particular scope of eCRM domain in advance and as a result, requirements elicitation can be achieved successfully. 5.3. Determine system requirements This step discusses the performance of requirements elicitation after the analyses of the previous two steps. First, Hypotheses 3 and 4 are tested. Their relationship structure is defined in terms of the performance of requirements elicitation as one dependent variable and consumer characteristics as 10 independent vari- Table 5 Regression results for customer characteristics and requirements elicitation. Source of variation df SS MS F P Regression Residual Total 9 145 154 35.78 128.07 163.85 3.99 0.88 4.53 0.00 Table 6 Impacts of customer strategies on requirements elicitation. Table 4 Univariate tests for marketing stimuli across customer strategies. Marketing attributes F Price Promotion Quality Product 5.33 4.43 4.23 4.12 P-value 0.028* 0.031* 0.039* 0.041* Customer strategies 1 2 3 6.31* 6.01* 5.75* 5.83* 5.25* 3.31 4.29 4.82* 4.83* 3.16 4.23 4.16 Group mean differences 1 > 3* 1 > 2, 3* 1 > 2, 3* 1 > 3* 1: customer acquisition; 2: customer retention; 3: strategic customer care. * P < 0.05. Customer strategy Emphases on consumer/marketing characteristics Performance Customer acquisition Income Price, Promotion, Quality, Product Age, Gender, Income, Education, Occupation, Personality Price, Product Age, Gender, Income, Education, Occupation, Values, Lifestyle, Personality Price 5.71* Customer retention Strategic customer care * P < 0.01. 6.16* 6.42* I.-L. Wu, C.-Y. Hung / Information and Software Technology 51 (2009) 1308–1318 ables. Both sets of variables are of metric attributes. Multiple regression analysis is used to examine the type of relationship structure. The testing results are reported in Table 5. Hypothesis 3 is accepted. By the same procedure, Hypothesis 4 is also accepted. Next, the performance of requirements elicitation can be assessed using the five measuring items defined in the questionnaire for the three groups of sample firms with different strategies. Their average performances and significant tests with t x ; x ¼ 4) in a 7-point Likert scale are indicated in statistics (t ¼ x psffi n Table 6. Finally, we make a brief summary for guiding the understanding of the above analysis as a whole. For the proposed theoretical framework, Hypotheses 1 and 2 were first examined for acceptance. Tables 3 and 4 are further presented. Hypotheses 3 and 4 were then examined for acceptance. Table 5 is further presented. In addition, the emphases on consumer and marketing characteristics for significantly impacting requirements elicitation while adopting different customer strategies are summarized in Table 6 based on the results listed out in Tables 3 and 4. This indicates that requirements elicitation performs well while following the strategy-based process. In that, the adoption of different customer strategies has different impacts on consumer behaviors and marketing attributes and further, provides insight to requirements elicitation in eCRM development. 6. Conclusions and suggestions As the growth of customer base has become more saturated and the price premium of products less differentiated, the need for better CRM is justified. While the Internet offers a tremendous amount of communication resources to support eCRM implementation, most organizations are rushing to move to web-based CRM systems. However, a high percentage of firms fail to achieve their CRM goals. While eCRM domain involves a number of compound components on product design, market characteristics, and consumer behavior, a strategy-based approach for requirements analysis can initially provide a clear picture for the domain. Therefore, this study proposes a three-step process for requirement elicitation, i.e., define customer strategies, identify consumer and marketing characteristics, and determine system requirements. Important findings are discussed below. While firms adopt different customer strategies in the market such as acquisition, the emphases of consumer attributes on building CRM practice such as income and price, are different in many aspects. Accordingly, requirements elicitation is effectively carried out based on the particular customer segments or marketing approaches. In summary, while software requirements engineering tries to define a well-written requirements specification for system developers, the three-step process based on a strategic perspective has shown a high level of performance achievement in requirements elicitation in this study and can be considered as a well-defined requirements specification framework for eCRM development, as indicated in Fig. 3. In the long term, we hope that the new approach has provided the important guidance to the area of requirements engineering 1315 while it can be extended appropriately in various development contexts. The implications for practitioners are noted as below. In order to effectively elicit requirements in eCRM development, system developers should initially focus on understanding what are the firm’s customer strategies for CRM practice, i.e., customer acquisition, customer retention, and strategic customer care. Alternatively, this drives the important consumer and marketing attributes for clearly defining the particular scope of eCRM domain while different firms will have different emphases on their attributes. The findings are summarized in Table 6. Accordingly, user requirements are stabilized under the defined scope and can be effectively determined. Besides, this approach also facilitates effective allocation of organizational resources and reduces system development cost. The implications for researchers are discussed as below. A strategy-based approach for requirements elicitation is critical in eCRM development since it intends to overcome developers’ and users’ inabilities in recognizing problem unstructuring issues. This is a common problem for developers in building complex softwares. Traditional method is an operation-based consideration and often difficult to converge in requirements determination process. Prior research has not discussed the important role of customer strategies in eCRM development and has only reported partially for the implementation process. This research provides a new thinking for emerging research on this issue. Furthermore, subsequent research could be based on this foundation. First, this study is primarily at developing a theoretical framework to effectively determine requirements and further, to empirically validate it by survey data. Future research could specifically conduct case studies longitudinally to understand the usefulness of this framework in building eCRM in practice. Second, the empirical survey is sampled from a combination of industries, so the conclusions are more general and comprehensive. Future research could be targeted toward the particular industries, for instance, banking industry, to understand their differences and similarities. Third, IS managers or CIOs (from developers’ perspective) are chosen as participants in this survey since this study mainly involves the planning work of system development. However, a complementary study from the perspective of marketing personnel (from users’ perspective) would provide further insight to understand requirements analysis. Finally, although this research has produced some useful results, a number of limitations may be inherent in it. First, the response rate (18%) is slightly lower than desirable, despite the various efforts to improve it. This may be due to that CIOs currently lack a strategy-based experience in eCRM development. However, the sample data indicate no systematic non-response bias in the responding sample and are well representative of the sample frame. In fact, in comparison with many prior survey studies, the response rate is quite acceptable. Next, CIOs from larger firms are primarily chosen for the participants in the survey; however, some of the questionnaires may have been completed by subordinates, and as a result the data may be some biases. 1316 Appendix A. Questionnaire I.-L. Wu, C.-Y. Hung / Information and Software Technology 51 (2009) 1308–1318 I.-L. Wu, C.-Y. Hung / Information and Software Technology 51 (2009) 1308–1318 References [1] T.C. Albert, P.B. Goes, A. Gupta, A model for design and management of content and interactivity of customer-centric web sites, MIS Quarterly 28 (2004) 161– 182. [2] L.S. Al-Salem, A. Samaha, Eliciting web application requirements – an industrial case study, Information and Software Technology 80 (2007) 294– 313. [3] T.A. Alspaugh, A.I. Anton, Scenario support for effective requirements, Information and Software Technology 50 (2008) 198–220. [4] H. Arsham, D.F. Dianich, Consumer buying behavior and optimal advertising strategy: the quadratic profit function case, Computer and Operations Research 15 (1998) 299–310. 1317 [5] J.R. Bettman, An Information Processing Theory of Consumer Choice, AddisonWesley, MA, 1979. [6] M.J. Berry, G.S. Linoff, Data Mining Techniques, Second ed., John Wiley & Sons, Indiana, 2004. [7] B. Bowman, G.B. Davis, J.C. Wetherbe, Three stage model of MIS planning, Information & Management 6 (1983) 11–25. [8] S.A. Brown, Customer Relationship Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ontario, 2000. [9] G.J. Browne, M.B. Rogich, An empirical investigation of user requirements elicitation: comparing the effectiveness of promoting techniques, Journal of Management Information Systems 17 (2001) 223–249. [10] W. Buckinx, D. Van den Poel, Customer base analysis: partial defection of behaviorally loyal clients in a non-contractual FMCG retail setting, European Journal of Operational Research 164 (2005) 252–268. 1318 I.-L. Wu, C.-Y. Hung / Information and Software Technology 51 (2009) 1308–1318 [11] C. Bull, Strategic issues in customer relationship management implementation (CRM), Business Process Management Journal 9 (2003) 592–602. [12] R. Chalmeta, Methodology for customer relationship management, Journal of System and Software 79 (2006) 1015–1024. [13] J.O. Chan, Toward a unified view of customer relationship management, Journal of American Academy of Business 6 (2005) 32–38. [14] J. Coughlan, M. Lycett, R.D. Macredie, Communication issues in requirements elicitation: a content analysis of stakeholder experiences, Information and Software Technology 45 (2003) 525–537. [15] J. Curry, A. Curry, The Customer Marketing Method, Simon & Schuster, New York, 2000. [16] G.B. Davis, Strategies for information requirements determination, IBM Systems Journal 21 (1982) 4–30. [17] J.F. Engel, R.D. Blackwell, P.W. Miniard, Consumer Behavior, sixth ed., Dryden Press, Chicago, 1990. [18] C. Fornell, D.F. Larcker, Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error, Journal of Marketing Research 18 (1981) 39–50. [19] T.W. Greun, The outcome set of relationship marketing in consumer markets, International Business Review 4 (1995) 447–469. [20] P.J. Guinan, J.G. Cooprider, S. Faraj, Enabling software development team performance during requirements definition: a behavioral versus technical approach, Information Systems Research 9 (1998) 101–125. [21] J.W. Henry, R.W. Stone, A structural equation model of end-user satisfaction with a computer-based medical information system, Information Resources Management Journal 7 (1994) 21–33. [22] J.A. Hoffer, J.F. George, J.S. Valacich, Modern Systems Analysis & Design, fourth ed., Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, 2005. [23] J.A. Howard, J.N. Sheth, The Theory of Buyer Behavior, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1969. [24] B. Ives, G.P. Learmonth, The information system as a competitive information system, Communications of the ACM 27 (1984) 1193–1201. [25] R. Kalakota, M. Robinson, E-business: Roadmap for Success, Addison-Wesley, MA, 2001. [26] S.H. Kale, CRM failure and the seven deadly sins, Marketing Management 13 (2004) 42–46. [27] B. Karakostas, D. Kardaras, E. Papathanassiou, The state of CRM adoption by the financial services in the UK: an empirical investigation, Information & Management 42 (2005) 853–863. [28] M. Kennedy, A.M. King, Using customer relationship management to increase profits, Strategic Finance 85 (2004) 36–42. [29] R.C. King, R. Sen, M. Xia, Impact of web-based e-commerce on channel strategy in retailing, International Journal of Electronic Commerce 8 (2004) 103–130. [30] E. Ko, S.H. Kim, M. Kim, J.Y. Woo, Organizational characteristics and the CRM adoption process, Information and Software Technology 61 (2008) 65–74. [31] Y. Ko, S. Park, J. Seo, S. Choi, Using classification techniques for informal requirements in the requirements analysis-supporting system, Information and Software Technology 49 (2007) 1128–1140. [32] P. Kotler, Market Management – Analysis, Planning, Implementation & Control, seventh ed., Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, 1997. [33] V. Kumar, W. Reinartz, Customer Relationship Management: A Databased Approach, John Wiley & Sons, 2006. [34] T.J. Larson, J.D. Naumann, An experimental comparison of abstract and concrete representations in system analysis, Information & Management 22 (1992) 29–40. [35] W.M. Lassar, S.S. Lassar, N.A. Rauseo, Developing a CRM strategy in your firm, Journal of Accountancy 206 (2008) 68–73. [36] L. Lee-Kelley, D. Gilbert, R. Mannicom, How e-CRM can enhance customer loyalty, Marketing Intelligence & Planning 21 (2003) 239–248. [37] R. Leifer, S. Lee, J. Durgee, Deep structures: real information requirements determination, Information & Management 27 (1994) 275–285. [38] K. Liu, L. Sun, Y. Fu, Ontological modeling of content management and provision, Information and Software Technology 50 (2008) 1155–1164. [39] M. Maguire, Context of use within usability activities, International Journal of Human–Computer Studies 55 (2001) 453–483. [40] L.E. Mendoza, A. Marius, M. Perez, A. Griman, Critical success factors for a customer relationship management strategy, Information and Software Technology 49 (2007) 913–945. [41] J.C. Mowen, M. Minors, Consumer Behavior, fifth ed., Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, 1998. [42] M.H. Morris, Relationship marketing in practice – myths and realities, Industrial Marketing Management 27 (1998) 359–371. [43] S. Neumann, Strategic Information Systems: Competition through Information Technologies, Macmillan College, New York, 1994. [44] P.A. Pavlou, Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce – integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model, International Journal of Electronic Commerce 7 (2003) 69–103. [45] A. Payne, P. Frow, The role of multichannel integration in customer relationship management, Industrial Marketing Management 33 (2004) 527– 538. [46] J. Peppard, Customer relationship management in financial services, European Management Journal 18 (2000) 312–327. [47] D. Peppers, M. Rogers, B. Dorf, Is your company ready for one-to-one marketing?, Harvard Business Review 77 (1999) 151–160 [48] S. Ratchev, E. Urwin, D. Muller, K.S. Pawar, I. Moulek, Knowledge based requirements engineering for one-of-a-kind complex systems, KnowledgeBased Systems 16 (2003) 1–5. [49] D. Rigby, D. Ledingham, CRM done right, Harvard Business Review 82 (2004) 118–127. [50] C. Rolland, Requirements engineering for COTs based systems, Information and Software Technology 41 (1999) 985–990. [51] H. Saiedian, R. Dale, Requirements engineering: making the connection between the software developer and customer, Information and Software Technology 42 (2000) 419–428. [52] L.G. Schiffman, L.L. Kanuk, Consumer Behavior, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, 1994. [53] J.E. Scott, The measurement of information systems effectiveness: evaluating a measuring instrument, in: Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Information Systems, Vancouver, British Columbia, 1994, pp. 111–128. [54] A. Sharma, G.R. Iyer, Country effects on CRM success, Journal of Relationship Marketing 5 (2006) 63–78. [55] J.N. Sheth, Models of Buying Behavior, Harper & Row, New York, 1974. [56] J.N. Sheth, B.I. Newman, B.L. Gross, Consumption Values and Market Choices: Theory and Applications, South-Western, Cincinnati, 1991. [57] S.S. Some, Supporting use case based requirements engineering, Information and Software Technology 48 (2006) 43–58. [58] M. Stone, N. Woodcock, M. Wilson, Marketing planning to customer relationship management, Long Range Planning 29 (1996) 675–683. [59] A. Sutcliffe, Task-related information analysis, International Journal of Human–Computer Studies 47 (1997) 223–257. [60] R.S. Swift, Accelerating Customer Relationship: Using CRM and Relationship Technologies, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, 2000. [61] J.T.C. Teng, V. Sethi, A comparison of information requirements analysis methods: an experimental study, Database 20 (1990) 29–39. [62] E. Turban, D. King, J. Lee, D. Viehland, Electronic Commerce. A Managerial Perspective, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, 2004. [63] J.A.E. van Nunen, R.A. Zuidwijk, E-enabled closed-loop supply chains, California Management Review 46 (2004) 40–48. [64] H. Wilson, M. Clark, B. Smith, Justifying CRM projects in a business-to-business context: the potential of the benefits dependency network, Industrial Marketing Management 36 (2007) 770–783. [65] I.-L. Wu, K.-W. Wu, A hybrid technology acceptance approach for exploring eCRM adoption in organizations, Behavior and Information Technology 24 (2005) 303–316. Ing-Long Wu is a professor in the Department of Information Management at National Chung Cheng University. He gained a Bachelor in Industrial Management from National Cheng-Kung University, a M.S. in Computer Science from Montclair State University, and a Ph.D. in Management from Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey. He has published a number of papers in Journal of American Society for Information Science and Technology, Information & Management, Decision Support Systems, International Journal of Human Computer Studies, Behavior & Information Technology, Psychometrika, Applied Psychological Measurement, and Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics. His current research interests are in the areas of CRM, SCM, knowledge management, and e-commerce. Ching-Yi Hung currently works as a senior researcher in Business and Marketing Strategy Lab. at Chung-Hwa Telecommunication Inc. She gained a MBA in information management from National Yunlin University of Science and Technology. She has been working many years in the areas of CRM and system development.
© Copyright 2024