1. No category

Finnish Transport Agency (FTA) Mauri Mäkiaho
Curriculum Vitae
Mr. Mauri Mäkiaho
Born 13. Jan 1964
Working history, more than 20 years as a civil cervant





from 2011 civil servant in Finnish Transport Agency’s investment unit
from 2005 civil servant in the Finnish Public Roads Administration in Häme district and in
the Centre for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment, Pirkanmaa region
from 2002 civil servant as an designer and road inspector in city of Valkeakoski
from 1995 civil servant as an designer officer in city of Loviisa
from 1988 structural designer and supervisor in the private sectors engineering office
My work experience includes various infrastructure projects, such as bridge and road projects,
water supply systems and port engineering structures. Mostly as an project owner and tasks are
related to the administration and project management.
Also I have been participating some development works nationally and internationally. I am a
member of the Nordic Road Associations strategic planning and road structure divisions and just
recently I was asked to join also the road tunnel division.
Education:




2010 Master Degree, Programme in Strategic Leadership of Tecnology -based business
2006 Developer qualification of FISE (Qualification of Professionals in Building, HVAC and
Real Estate Sector in Finland)
2004 Engineer Building and construction Programme Civil Engineering
1989 Civil Engineering Technician Degree
Finnish Transport Agency FTA
(Finnish Road Administration)
WE ARE an expert organisation
specialising in transport and
operating under the
jurisdiction of the Ministry of
Transport and Communications
WE ENSURE smooth, efficient
and safe travel and transport
WE PROMOTE traffic safety and
a sustainable development of
the regions
WE ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR
Finland’s roads, railways and
waterways and for the overall
development of Finland's transport
system
WE EMPLOY 650 professionals. In
addition, we indirectly employ about
12,000 persons in various infrastructure
projects
OUR ANNUAL BUDGET is
approx. 1.8 billion euros
We are responsible for the Finnish
transport system
• FTA’s mission is to improve the
transport infrastructure to ensure
effective travel and transport chains
railway traffic
maritime traffic
road traffic
FTA is the Finland's largest infrastructure owner in Finland
Some numbers from 2014
Enhancing
Operating costs
competitiveness
86 million €
Building
of
in maritime transport
the West Metro
Other
Public transport, 85 million € 56 million €
9 million €
commuter
ferry traffic
36 million €
Improvements
109 million €
Traffic Services
178 million €
Routine
maintenance
327 million €
Development investments
569 million €
Periodic maintenance
376 million €
Of these sums, the Transport and Infrastructure responsibility area of the ELY Centres order road
maintenance, planning and small investments for about 0.6 billion euros.
Different challenges and opportunities
Western Finland:
• to ensure effective
transport chains to
important traffic nodes and
ports.
Southern Finland:
• to provide adequate
capacity for the nationwide
and international transports
of trade and industry
• to facilitate the mobility
of labour by good public
transport connections
Northern Finland:
• to meet the needs of the
mining/other heavy
industries and the tourism
industry
Eastern Finland:
• to provide connections to
Russia
• to meet the needs of the
tourism, mining and forest
industries
• Saimaa Canal operations
Integrated Project Deliveries in
Finland
Research project of the Project Alliance 2007/2008
LCI comes to Finland 2008
 Lean principles, Integrated project deliveries and Lean Construction
tools and methods started to achieve understanding
LIPS in Karlsruhe Germany 2009, Jim Ross introduced the Project
Alliance
 EU-legislation challenge in the public sector
LIPS in Washington DC 2010
 We might be able to challenge the EU-legislation
LIPPI in Brisbane Australia 2011
 First Project Alliance has been established, several others coming
LIPS in Tampere Finland 2012
 We have 4 alliance projects
EGLC 2015
23
alliance projects
LIPS in Nottingham 2013
 We have 6 alliance projects and some hybrids, more coming
 LCI-Finland has 4,5 M€ R&D project 2013-2015
LIPS in Berkeley 2014
 We have more than 16 alliance projects including some hybrids and
more coming
 LCI-Finland has 4,5 M€ R&D project 2013-2015
We chose Project Alliancing to be the IPD model and wanted to
implement it to the Finnish market,
but
The Alliance contracting model in Australia has two aspects, which are not in
line with European Union legislation:
In Australia:
 There is no need to use price in comparison
 There is no need to write out verbal comparison about every comparison
criteria
We need price component in
EU
No price component, pure alliance
and Single TOC
Budget critique and quality
of pricing methods
Full price competition between
two NOPs (Dual TOC)
Fee as a price
component
Price is made up of unit
prices and fee %
Alliancing versus European union
procurement legislation
According to the EU directives and Finnish
legislation
–The price should be used, when contracting
authority is making comparison of tenders
 Two possible selection criteria: The lowest
price or the most economically advantageous
tender (so-called quality and price)
 In our case, we are going to use limb 2 as a
price element.
–Contracting entities should write out
justifications for every comparison criteria
So far FTA has been using as an
price element
The fee offer with 25 % of
weight
The quality issues with 75 % of
weight
The European
commission rejected
claim against using
Alliance Model September
2013
Starting IPD-projects in Finland 1/2015
Yhteistoimintahankkeiden vaiheet
Hanke
1 Tampere-Pori Railroad Renovation, Finnish Transport Agency
2 Vuolukiventie Residential Housing Renovation, University of Helsinki
3 Tampere Tunnel Project Alliance
M€
18
6 Järvenpää City Hospital Project Alliance
50
Q1 Q2
Q3
2013
Q4
Q1 Q2
Q3
2014
Q4
Q1 Q2
Q3
2015
Q4
Q1 Q2
Q3
6
11 Gunillankallio Rental Residential Housing Project Alliance, Seafarer's Pension Fund
10
12 Nuclear Safety Building, National Research Centre, Senate Properties
30
13 Jyrkkälä Suburban Renovation, Jyrkkälänpolku Real Estate
20
14 Joensuun Justice and Police Station Project Alliance, Senate Properties
30
15 Naantali Powerplant Project Alliance
50
18
17 Kainuu Central Hospital Project Alliance
120
18 Highway 6 Taaveti-Lappenranta renovvation, Finnsih Transport Agency
100
19 Kempele Medical Center
14
20 Kotka Police Hedquarters, Senate Properties
20
21 Hiukkavaara Community Center, City of Oulu
24
23 Tampere Tramway / Infra
2012
Q4
6
10
22 Espoonlahti Church
Q3
19
10 Retkeilijänkatu Rental Residential Housing Project, Fira Ltd
16 Administration Building Renovation, University of helsinki
Q1 Q2
18
20
9 Pakila Maintenance Contract, City of Helsinki
2011
Q4
180
5 National Institute for Health and Welfare Head Office Project Alliance, Senate Properties
8 Lahti Transport Terminal Project Alliance
Q3
100
4 Helsinki Airport Maintenance Contract
7 Franzenia Project Partnering Renovation, University of Helsinki
2010
Q1 Q2
6
240
Lähde: Vison Alliance Partners Oy, Lauri Merikalliio
Q4
• Some results from FTA’s alliances
1st FTA Alliance; Lielahti – Kokemäki (railroad project)
• 89,5 milj. euro
• now ready
2nd FTA Alliance; Tampere road tunnel (mainroad improvement)
• 180,3 milj. euro
• under construction
3rd FTA Alliance; Taavetti – Lappeenranta (mainroad improvement)
• 100 milj. euro
• No measured results yet
• The development phase just started
1st Alliance, Lielahti Kokemäki, costs
Budjetti
Budjettiennuste
Budjettialitus 1,6 M€
Tilaajan materiaalit
18,8 M€
Budjetti
106,4 M€
Tilaajan materiaalit
17,4 M€
Bonuspooli
1,7 M€
TOC
89,5 M€
Palkkio korvattaville
kustannuksille n. 12%
9,0 M€
Riskit 0,5 M€
Tilaajan kustannukset
5,6 M€
Palveluntuottajan
korvattavat kustannukset
74,2 M€
Hankintavaihe
1,1 M€
Bonus
6,6 M€
Onnistuminen
ATA
TOC-alitus
Palkkio korvattaville
kustannuksille
8,8 M€
Tilaajan kustannukset
4,9 M€
TOC toteuma
80,0 M€
Budjettiennuste
104,8 M€
Palveluntuottajan
Korvattavat kustannukset
66,6 M€
Hankintavaihe
1,1 M€
HANKKEEN ENNUSTETTAVUUS ON ERINOMAINEN
26.3.2015
13
1st Alliance, Lielahti Kokemäki, chedule
Perinteinen hankintatapa
Hankkeen kokonaisaikataulu
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
Ratasuunnitelma
Rakentamissuunnittelu
Rakentamistöiden toteutus
Käyttöönottomenettelyt
Allianssin hankintatapa
Hankkeen kokonaisaikataulu
Ratasuunnitelma
Rakentamissuunnittelu
Rakentamistöiden toteutus
Käyttöönottomenettelyt
2nd Alliance, Tampere tunneling
Predictions:
• Ready 6 month earlier
• Costs 0,5 milj. under budget
So far
• More than 20 innovations, savings more than
20 million euros
The Tunnel of Rantaväylä
Tampere, Finland
Utsjoki
Kilpisjärvi
Sodankylä
Kelloselkä
Rovaniemi
Tornio
Kemi
Oulu
Vartius
Kajaani
Kokkola
Vaasa
Kuopio
Seinäjoki
Joensuu
Jyväskylä
Niirala
Tampere
Pori
Mikkeli
Lahti
Kotka
Helsinki
Hanko
Nuijamaa
Vaalimaa
Turku
Viikko 39/2012
Lappeenranta
Kouvola
7.4.2000
16
Tunnel allows
built new
housing to the
city center
17





2 one-way 2,3 km road tunnels
Interchange in both ends
Provision for one in the middle
Daily traffic volume Over 40 000
In the future 54 000
 Target costs 180,3 M€ (May 2013)
 Development period (in
Alliance) July 2012 – autumn
2013
 Implementation period (in
Alliance) has been started
October 2013
 Ready to use in 2017
 Finishing 2018
18
Tampere tunneling alliance
partners
WE DO EVERYTHING
TOGETHER
WE SHARE ALL IDEAS
TO ALL OTHERS
OWNERS
• Finnish Transport Agency
• Tampere City
SERVICE PROVIDERS
• Lemminkäinen Infra Oy
• Saanio & Riekkola Oy
• A-Insinöörit Suunnittelu Oy
19
Ideas and Innovations 3/2015
20
Lean
Using IPD is lean:
•
The level of common
understanding about the project is
in higher possible level from the
beginning
Using Alliance is lean:
Alliance contract and its commercial
model doesn`t prevent making changes
or use innovations flexibly. Also it
challenges everybody to improve
•
The Projects owner will have
benefits and service providers can
increase their fee when the whole
project is going to succeed
•
Unanimous decision-making
Incentive system
Lean
Risk sharing
• risk reduction
• risk elimination
• risk sharing
Alliance
Traditional
form of contracts
No separete risks
Clients risks and
and
oblications
no separete oblications
Clients risks are either sold to service providers
or they do not contribute to the management of them
The client is responsible for
the risks which service
Designers
and by
providers
canrisks
not affect
• oblications
Examine
• Desing
• Working methods
Contractors risks
Everything
else is shared
and oblications
Lean
Setting the Target cost
• Design to target –method is lean
Risk identification and analysis
Cost
Cost
comparison
Cost
comparison
Decision
Decision
Decision
Results aftercomparison
10 months develompent
phase
Cost
comparison
Decision
Decision
Cost
comparison
Moment
of
decision
TOC
Cost
comparison
Updating the cost estimate
Update of the TOC
Terrain surveys
Risk pricing
Updating the cost estimate
Plan accuracy
Setting the target cost with Target value Design method
Drawing up of overall schedule
Decision
Team work, building alliance spirit
August
January
May
Implementation
Tim
e phase
Lean
Shedule mangement
• Last Planner is lean
New target
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Development phase
• Design
• Key targets
• Target price
• Impl. plan
Implementation
phase
• Construction
Defects correction
period
26
Lean
Ideas and innovations
• To have effective and systematic process for exploding
ideas and innovations is lean
Lean
Risk management during the development face and
implementation
• Effective and systematic process for manage risks is
lean
At this point it seems that:
the schedule will succeed
= ready 6 months earlier
the target cost is not exceeded
=0,5 milj.€ under target
29
Performance
/Weight
30%
10%
10%
10%
20%
30
Performance
31
Performance
32
More information
Facebook
The Project Web Pages
•
•
http://portal.liikennevirasto.fi/sivu/www/f/
hankkeet/kaynnissa/tampereen_rantavayla
•
https://www.youtube.com/user/Rantatunn
eli
https://www.facebook.com/rantatunneli
Transparent monitoring
•
http://seuranta.rantatunneli.fi/
Project Brochure
One Article
•
•
http://www2.liikennevirasto.fi/rantatunneli
/en
http://yle.fi/uutiset/sukella_suomen_pisim
man_maantietunnelin_tyomaalle/7657536
Project Plan
•
http://portal.liikennevirasto.fi/portal/page/
portal/f/hankkeet/kaynnissa/tampereen_ra
ntavayla/Hankesuunnitelmarapo_ENGL_131
2_nettiversio_2.pdf
Value for Money report
•
http://portal.liikennevirasto.fi/portal/page/
portal/f/hankkeet/kaynnissa/tampereen_ra
ntavayla/Arvoa_rahalle_en.pdf
33
Thank you
34