Technical Information International Edition 812042_Baycox_TechManual_engl.indd 1 Coccidiocide for Lambs 27.01.2009 8:27:56 Uhr 2 812042_Baycox_TechManual_engl.indd 2 27.01.2009 8:28:01 Uhr Contents Introduction .................................................................................. 4 Coccidiosis in Sheep .................................................................... 6 Morphology of Eimeria spp. in Sheep ................................................. 6 Life Cycle of Ovine Coccidia ............................................................. 7 Prevalence and Epidemiology .......................................................... 10 Clinical and Pathological Manifestations ........................................... 14 Diagnosis ...................................................................................... 21 Management and Control ............................................................... 33 Baycox® 5% (Toltrazuril) ............................................................... 36 - Active Ingredient ................................................................. 36 - Spectrum of Activity ............................................................. 37 - Mode of Action ................................................................... 37 - Pharmacokinetics ................................................................ 37 - Treatment Time .................................................................... 38 Efficacy Trials ................................................................................ 41 References ................................................................................. 48 3 812042_Baycox_TechManual_engl.indd 3 27.01.2009 8:28:01 Uhr Introduction Coccidiosis is a disease of the intestinal tract of sheep caused by protozoa parasite Eimeria sp. Coccidiosis is usually insidious and the disease only becomes evident in infected animals after they show clinical signs such as diarrhoea, debilitation, or refusal of feed. Following the ingestion of sporulated coccidia oocysts from a contaminated environment, the parasite attaches to the epithelial lining of the intestines, invades and multiplies in the intestinal cells. After the pre-patent period of 12 – 20 days depending on the Eimeria species involved and its patogenicity, sheep start shedding oocysts in the faeces and contaminating the environment. Sheep coccidiosis has greatest impact on lambs less than 3 month old, causing severe damage to the 4 812042_Baycox_TechManual_engl.indd 4 27.01.2009 8:28:02 Uhr intestinal tract. It is associated with diarrhoea, dehydration, impared weight gain, or weight loss and death in some cases (Helle, 1970; Gjerde and Helle, 1991; Reeg et al., 2005). The economic impact of coccidiosis was calculated in small ruminants by Fitzgerald in 1980, at around US $ 140 million annually worldwide. Bayer Animal Health has more than 40 years experience in the control of coccidiosis. Numerous studies have been conducted and published by Bayer Animal Health about the epidemiology and control of coccidiosis in different animal species. Baycox® 5% oral suspension has been developed by Bayer Animal Health for the control of coccidiosis in sheep as a single one-dose ready to use product. 5 812042_Baycox_TechManual_engl.indd 5 27.01.2009 8:28:11 Uhr Coccidiosis in Sheep Morphology of Eimeria spp. in Sheep Sheep coccidiosis is caused by protozoan parasites of the genus Eimeria. The morphological characteristics of sheep Eimeria spp. are detailed in table 1. It is reported from many countries around the world. Fifteen Eimeria spp. were described as etiological agents in sheep (Reeg et al., 2005, Rommel 2000) and 10 species have been found in central Europe (Reeg et al., 2005). In Central and Eastern Europe, Eimeria ovinoidalis, Eimeria bakuensis, Eimerai crandallis/Eimeria weybridgensis, Eimeria parva and Eimeria faurei are the predominant species (Rommel 2000). Two of the 15 species that infect sheep, Eimeria crandallis and Eimeria ovinoidalis, have been associated with the disease in lambs, and they are considered to be the most pathogenic Eimeria species for sheep. Table 1. Morphological Characteristics of Eimeria species in Sheep Eimeria species Size (µm) Shape Color oocyst Oocyst polar cap Pathogenicity Oocyst residium Sporocyst residium Sporulation time (days) at 20 ºC E. ahsata 29-44 x 17-28 Ovoid yellowish + ++ - + 2-3 E. bakuensis 23-36 x 15-24 Elongante to ellipsoidal, often parallel or straight oocyst wall yellowish + ++ - + 2-4 E. crandallis 17-28 x 17-22 Broad ellipsoidal to spherical colourless +/- +/++ - + 1 -3 E. granulose 22-37 x 17-26 Urn-shaped, ovoid yellowish + - - + 3-4 E. intricata 40-56 x 30-41 Ellipsoidal Brown + - - + 3-7 E. marsica 15-22 x 11-14 Ellipsoidal colourless + - - + 3 E. punctata 18-28 x 16-21 Ovoid - + - + + 2 Broad ellipsoidal to spherical colourless + - - + 1 -3 25-37 x 19-27 Oval to pyriform Pale, yellowishbrown to greenish - -/+ - - 1 -3 E. ovinoidalis 17-28 x 12-23 Oval to ellipsoid Colourless to pale yellowish - +++ - + 1 -3 E. 17-31 x 14-19 weybridgensis E. faurei E. pallida 12-20 x 8-15 Ellipsoidal, delicate wall colourless - - - + 1 -3 E. parva 10-22 x 10-19 Spherical to subspherical colourless - + / ++ - + 3-5 Provided by Department of parasitology, faculty of veterinary medicine, University of Leipzig, Germany 6 812042_Baycox_TechManual_engl.indd 6 27.01.2009 8:28:15 Uhr Life cycle of ovine coccidia All Eimeria species are monoxenous. Infection of an animal occurs following the ingestion of water or feed contaminated with sporulated oocysts. The life cycle of coccidia has two phases: an exogenous phase and an endogenous phase (Fig 1). The exogenous phase takes place outside of the body in the environment and is called “sporulation of oocysts“. During the endogenous phase, which occurs internally, the parasite undergoes numerous divisions in the intestinal cells. Both stages are described below. Figure 1. Life cycle of ovine coccidia 7 812042_Baycox_TechManual_engl.indd 7 27.01.2009 8:28:16 Uhr Exogenous phase Endogenous phase The unsporulated oocysts are passed out in the faecal material of the sheep into the environment. Under optimal environmental conditions such as moisture, temperature (24 – 32°C) and oxygen, unsporulated oocysts of most species sporulate in approximately 2 to 5 days. Oocysts are usually killed at temperatures over 40°C and below -30°C, but between these extremes, sporulated and non sporulated oocysts can remain viable for more than a year (Foreyt, 1986). Unsporulated oocysts are more susceptible to extreme changes in climatic conditions than sporulated oocysts. (Horton-Smith and Long, 1954). Oocysts can withstand freezing at -5°C to -8°C for several months (Schneider et al., 1972) and have been shown to be able to overwinter in Norway on pastures and be infective to grazing animals in the next grazing season (Helle, 1970). The sheep ingests up the sporulated oocysts with contaminated feed or water. Once into the digestive tract, the digestive tract enzymes exert their influence on the oocysts weakening the oocyst wall sufficiently so that the active sporozoites escape into the lumen of the gut (Fitzgerald, 1980). These sporozoites enter the appropriate host mucosal cells. At this stage the sporozoites are called trophozoites. They then undergo nuclear division, or schizogony, and schizonts are formed. This is the first generation of schizogony. The endogenous phase of the life cycle starts after uptake of the sporulated oocysts. When the schizonts mature, the first-generation of merozoites is released and they enter other appropriate host cells and continue the cycle of asexual development. In the new host cell the merozoites round up to become trophozoites and undergo nuclear fission or asexual division as before, developing into second-generation schizonts and, in turn, into second-generation merozoites. Second-generation merozoites may develop further into subsequent 8 812042_Baycox_TechManual_engl.indd 8 27.01.2009 8:28:17 Uhr generations of merozoites. This asexual reproduction, however, does not continue indefinitely. The number of merozoite generations (asexual multiplication generations) varies between two and more from species to species. After a fixed number of schizogony (merozoite generations), the last generation merozoites begin the sexual reproduction phase (gametogony). The last-generation merozoites change into trophozoites that, instead of repeating schizogony, differentiate into macrogametocytes (macrogamonts) and microgametocytes (microgamonts). These grow to full size and each macrogametocyte gives rise to one macrogamete. Each microgametocyte gives rise to a large number of biflagellate microgametes. Fertilization of the macrogamete by the microgamete results in the formation of a zygote. The zygote lays a wall around itself to form an oocyst. The oocyst breaks out of the host cell into the intestinal lumen and is excreted with faeces. The prepatent period (the time taken oral uptake of sporulated oocysts to excretion of oocyst) is 15-20 days for Eimeria crandallis, and 12-15 days for Eimeria ovinoidalis. The young microgametes contain small granules in the vicinity of nucleus, which later enlarge and scatter over the cytoplasm. The large granules are found on the periphery of the cell and are called “wallforming granules” that form the wall of the oocyst after fertilization of the macrogamete. 9 812042_Baycox_TechManual_engl.indd 9 27.01.2009 8:28:17 Uhr Prevalence and epidemiology Prevalence Ovine coccidiosis is present worldwide in almost all sheep rearing countries (Pellerdy, 1974) and it is assumed that most, if not all, domestic ruminants become infected with coccidia during their lives (Taylor and Catchpole, 1994). However some Eimeria species are more important than others with regard to their pathogenicity. Amongst various ovine coccidia species, Eimeria crandallis and Eimeria ovinoidalis are important from a clinical point of view. In central Europe, 10 Eimeria species have been found (Reeg et al., 2005). The prevalence of coccidiosis in different countries is summarized in table 2. Table 2. Prevalence of sheep coccidiosis in different countries Country Germany Turkey E. crandallis E. ovinoidalis Eimeria sp. No. of animals (flocks) Reference - - 43.1% 524 Epe et al. 2004 100 % 100 % - 222 Reeg et al. 2005 98.2-100 % 96.5-100 % 26.3-100% 239 Barutzki et al. 1990 64.9 % 35.2 % 13.7 % 55.24% 43.5 % 47.7 % 97.9 % 248 241 592 Kaya 2004 Gül 2007 Arslan et al. 1999 Switzerland - - 97.5 % 122 Pfister and Flury 1985 Hungary 8.6 % 51.5 % - (15) Hovarti and Varga, 1986 Poland - - 4.6-60 % - Gorski et al. 2004 - - 20.7-8.5% 1740 Nowosad et al. 2002 New Zealand 70 % - 93 % 215 McKenna 1972 Austria 27.3 % 28.3 % 97-100 % 186 Platzer et al. 2005 Czech Repub. - - 67-88 % (4) Jelonova et al. 1990 - - 74-98 % 50 - 70 Chroust et al. 1998 USA 85 % - 100 % 219 Ajayi and Todd, 1977 Spain (Mallorca) - - 75.1% 197 Gomez et al. 1998 UK 72.5 – 86.1 % 9.7 - 36.2 % - 135 Berriatua et al. 1994 Mexico - - 81.7 % (15) Nahed-Toral et al. 2003 Italy - - 95.3 % 160 Ambrosi et al. 1982 - - 47.7 % 65.6 % (904) adult (375), young Arru et al. 1984 Brazil 47.2% 52.8% - 30 Silva et al. 2008 France 6–8% 32 – 35 % 80 – 100 % - Mage et al 1995 10 812042_Baycox_TechManual_engl.indd 10 27.01.2009 8:28:17 Uhr Epidemiology Coccidiosis is a frequently diagnosed, but often misunderstood and neglected parasitic infection in sheep. Outbreaks of disease are known to occur from the tropics to the temperate zones, but little is known of the significance of coccidial infections in arctic zones (Fitzgerald, 1980). Since sporulated oocysts are the infective stage of the pathogen, the sporulation of oocysts excreted via feces in the environment is crucial. Sporulation of Eimeria species in general is most rapid at 28°C to 31°C. Low temperatures of 0°C to 5°C retard sporulation, but sporulation will occur when the temperature is increased. Species of ovine coccidia can survive for 7 days at -25°C. Storage of Eimeria oocysts at 4°C for 14 weeks reduced sporulation by approximately 50 percent, whereas storage at 4°C for 26 weeks prevented sporulation (Foreyt, 1986). There is some evidence that some oocysts survive the winter in most areas of the US and lambs become infected in spring when they ingest the oocysts (Foreyt, 1986). Coccidiosis affects mostly young animals. Taylor and Catchpole (1994) pointed out that coccidiosis is most commonly seen in unweaned lambs aged 4-7 weeks either indoors or on heavily-stocked pasture in cold wet weather. Similarly, Foreyt (1986) stated that clinical coccidiosis is observed most frequently in 2 to 8 week-old lambs housed with their dams; in lamb rearing facilities; in lambs 2 to 3 weeks after weaning that are entering feedlots or experiencing a change in diet; or after severe periods of stress, such as shipping, bad weather, or concomitant disease. The disease may also occur in ewes and lambs that are maintained for long periods of time on contaminated wet areas or heavily stocked irrigated pastures. The susceptibility of lambs to coccidiosis increases with the age up until about 4 weeks. But, young lambs are most susceptible to coccidiosis. In France (Yvore and Esnault, 1987) and Ireland (Taylor and Kenny, 1988), coccidiosis is seen after weaning, or after changes in nutrition or environment. Orgeur et al. (1998) studied the consequences of 2 different type of weaning regimes, progressive weaning (PROG) and sudden weaning (SUDD), and found out that in lambs the number of oocysts excreted at 9.5 and 16.5 11 812042_Baycox_TechManual_engl.indd 11 27.01.2009 8:28:17 Uhr weeks of age was higher in PROG than in SUDD lambs. In the USA, coccidiosis causes problems in feedlot lambs which are weaned and transported often over long distances and kept crowded together (Mahrt and Sherrick, 1965). Bauer (1989) reported that an outbreak of eimeriosis in suckling lambs occurred two weeks after turn-out on pasture and in the same flock Nematodirus battus infection was detected for the first time in Germany. Barutzki et al. (1989) found a relation between age and season concerning the oocyst output in lambs in Germany. In this epidemiological study it was shown that the intensity and persistence of oocyst output showed distinct age related differences, since lambs always passed oocysts in larger numbers and more frequently than either ewes or yearlings. The total oocyst output in lambs reached a peak in March/ April. E. bakuensis, E. ovinoidalis, E. parva, E. weybridgensis/ crandallis were regularly isolated and were associated with a high faecal OPG (oocysts per gram faeces) value. In the UK, E. crandallis and E. ovinoidalis were the predominant species found in 5-6 weekold lambs with diarrhea and a high faecal OPG of 105 (Gregory et al. 1980). In this study, most of the faecal samples showed three or more coccidial species present. Same authors published in 1989 that management at lambing plays a role in the epidemiology of ovine coccidiosis. Of 24 lambing pens, 12 were left unused until halfway through the lambing period. The others were used normally, with a record kept of the occupants and of their faecal oocyst output. The mean daily weight gain up to 10 weeks of 22 lambs in used pens was 38 per cent greater than that of the 18 lambs in unused pens. They were also heavier at weaning. Authors suggested that an early challenge with coccidia, before the lamb becomes susceptible to their pathogenic effect, may help to reduce clinical coccidiosis (Gregory et al. 1989). Factors which play important role in the epidemiology of coccidiosis were presented in figure 2. 12 812042_Baycox_TechManual_engl.indd 12 27.01.2009 8:28:18 Uhr Host • Susceptibility/age • Stress factors (change of diet, weaning, shipping, crowding etc.) • Immune status • Exposure Parasite • Number • Type • Dispersion Environment • Conditions for sporulation (temperature, oxygen, humidity) • Management system (loose bedding, slatted flooring, pasture etc.) • Hygiene • Feed hygiene, Drinking hygiene • Climate Fig 2. Factors participating in the epidemiology of coccidiosis Taylor (1995) reported that ewes are often considered to be the source of infection for lambs and initially this may be true. If infected soon after birth, a lamb`s first encounter with coccidian usually causes no disease. However, coccidian can still establish themselves and multiply enormously meaning that if a lamb picks up a few thousand oocysts during its first week of the life it will release several thousand million into the environment two to three weeks later. Hidalgo-Agüello and Cordero-Del-Campillo (1987) found a relationship between season/age and oocyst excretion in Spain. Geographical and climatic conditions in different regions of Spain influenced the infection level in sheep and the highest oocyst excretion rate was found in the lambs. A significant difference was observed between different age groups. In France according to Le Sueur et al. 2007, in sheep-pen lambs, infection occurs generally during the days following birth and the majority of the lambs exhibit signs of coccidiosis between 13 812042_Baycox_TechManual_engl.indd 13 27.01.2009 8:28:18 Uhr 4 & 7 weeks of age. In France, the 3 major risk periods are the days following birth, weaning and after the grazing season. The major pathogenic Eimeria species in French sheep are Eimeria ovinoidalis, Eimeria ovina and Eimeria crandallis (Mage, 1995). In the figure 3, the oocysts shedding period just after lambing in French intensive sheep rearing farm was presented (Le Sueur et al. 2007). Figure 3. Percentage of lambs with positive OPG after lambing in an intensive sheep rearing farm in France (Le Sueur et al. 2007, unpublished) Clinical and pathological manifestations E. crandallis and E. ovinoidalis are the most pathogenic Eimeria species in sheep. E. bakuensis and E. parva are also considered to have some degree of pathogenicity in sheep (see table 1). However, in most cases coccidiosis occurs as a result of mixed infection and it is very rare for it to be caused by one single species only. In table 3 and 4 the sites of infection and prepatent periods are listed. Coccidiosis is normally a flock problem. The first sign that coccidiosis may be affecting a flock is that lambs may not be thriving as well as expected. Several lambs may have a 14 812042_Baycox_TechManual_engl.indd 14 27.01.2009 8:28:18 Uhr tucked-up and open fleeced appearance with a few showing faecal staining around the rear end due to diarrhea. Lambs eventually lose their appetite and become weak und unthrifty (Taylor, 1995). The severity of damage to the intestinal mucosa is closely associated with the number of pathogenic species’ oocysts picked up from the environment. As the disease progresses, some lambs show profuse watery diarrhoea, often containing streaks of blood. If left untreated, these animals may continue to scour and eventually die of dehydration (Taylor, 1995). Affected animals are depressed and anorectic (Foreyt, 1986). In the figure 4, a typical sign of diarrhea in lambs and in the figure 5 retarded growth of a lamb due to coccidiosis was presented. Figure 4. Diarrhoea due to coccidiosis in sheep (both left and right) Figure 5. Left: lamb suffered from coccidiosis (retarded growth) Right: lamb with normal growth. Typical signs of clinical coccidiosis in lambs are (Taylor, 1995): • Diarrhoea (with or without mucus or blood) • Fever • Inappetance • Abdominal pain • Unthriftiness and weight loss • Anaemia • Fleece damage • Death 15 812042_Baycox_TechManual_engl.indd 15 27.01.2009 8:28:18 Uhr Table 3. Site of infection and prepatent period of Eimeria spp. in sheep Eimeria sp. Infection site (Taylor 1995) Prepatent period (days) (Taylor et al. 2007) E. ovinoidalis Ileum and caecum, colon 12 - 15 E. crandallis Ileum and caecum, colon 15 - 20 E. bakuensis Small intestine 18 - 29 E. ahsata Small intestine 18 - 30 E. faurei Small and large intestine 13 - 15 E. intrica Small intestine 23- 27 E. parva Small intestine 12 -14 E. weybridgensis Small intestine 23 -33 Table 4. Site of infection and prepatent period of Eimeria spp. in goats (Taylor et al. 2007). Eimeria sp. IInfection site E. alijevi Small and large intestine Prepatent period (days) 7-12 E. aspheronica Unknown 14-17 E. arloingi Small intestine 14-17 E. caprina Small and large intestine 17-20 E. caprovina Unknown 14-20 E. christenseni Small intestine 14-23 E. hirci Unknown 13-16 E. jolchijevi Unknown 14-17 E. ninakohlyakimovae Small and large intestine 10-13 E. ovinoidalis is seen as the most pathogenic species occurring in sheep. Affected animals show diarrhoea, which is usually hemorrhagic, abdominal pain and anorexia. On postmortem the caecum is usually inflamed, empty and contracted and the caecal wall is hyperemic, oedematous and thickened. In some cases the mucosa may be hemorrhagic. Ileum and colon may also be affected. Much of the damage to the caecum is associated with the gamonts because they are the most numerous (Taylor and Catchpole, 1994). Mucosal polyps in sheep due to coccidiosis caused by Eimeria bakuensis were presented in the figures 6 and 7. Tontis and Häfeli (1985) reported that they observed multiple polyps in the small intestines of small 16 812042_Baycox_TechManual_engl.indd 16 27.01.2009 8:28:40 Uhr Figure 6. Mucosal polyps in jejunum (3 – 8 mm) caused by E. bakuensis (Takla, 1992) Figure 7. Eimeria bakuensis polyps in small intestine (Crown copyright - picture supplied by Prof Mike Taylor) ruminants caused by coccidiosis. In lambs polyps were located in the jejunum and ileum and 2/3 of the intestines were affected by polyps at a rate of 3 to 12 polyps in 10 cm of intestine. Authors related this finding to chronic coccidiosis in lambs. Gregory et al. (1987) reported that E. crandallis and E. bakuensis can stimulate host-cell mitosis and also that they may be able to synchronize their division with that of the host cells. In Eimeria crandallis Infection and in coccidial polyps, the parasites can divide continuously in synchrony with the host epithelial cells, thereby prolonging endogenous multiplication for an indefinite number of generations. This process can explain the development of intestinal polyps observed in lambs affected by coccidiosis. A total number of 21 small ruminants including six goats and 15 sheep aged between 2 weeks and 6 years old with histories of depression, loss of appetite, yellow to dark watery diarrhea, progressive dehydration and emaciation were referred for diagnosis of coccidiosis (Tafti and Mansourran, 2008). At necropsy, gross lesions were seen mostly in the jejunum, ileum, cecum, and sometimes in the proximal colon. Three cases had minimal lesions including a few scattered, whitish, non-pedunculated to pedunculated nodules on the mucosa of the jejunum and ileum. Eighteen cases had marked lesions 17 812042_Baycox_TechManual_engl.indd 17 27.01.2009 8:28:40 Uhr including numerous small whitish non-pedunculated nodules on the mucosa of the jejunum, ileum, cecum, and proximal colon. Advanced cases had adenomatous-like mucosa and a cerebriform or gyrate pattern on the serosal surface. The most common lesions were in the jejunum, ileum, and cecum, observed grossly as non-pedunculated whitish nodules and microscopically, as proliferative enteritis with presence of developmental stages of the Eimeria in the hyperplastic enterocytes (Tafti and Mansourian 2008). In an experimental study, Gregory et al. (1987) observed that in lambs infected with 5 x 104 or more oocysts and killed before day 14 after inoculation, giant meronts were seen in the small intestine as pin-point white spots visible to the naked eye. Crypt hyperplasia (increased length of crypts) and atrophy (shortening of villi) were seen to varying extents at all stages. Doses higher than 106 caused extensive loss of epithelial cells in the lower jejunum both from the surface and from the crypts at 10 days post inoculation when the first generation of meronts were mature. Doses of 103 oocysts or more caused diarrhea from about 13 day post inoculation in both first and second infections, which was associated with massive invasion of the caecal epithelium by second-generation meronts and gamonts. In an other experimental study, Gregory and Catchpole (1990) infected lambs aged between 4 and 12 weeks of age with doses of sporulated oocysts of Eimeria crandallis ranging from 50 to 300.000.000. Clinical effects were very variable and not closely related to the inoculating dose. Some lambs showed intermittent diarrhea, sometimes watery and sometimes containing muco-fibrinous material, either in the form of intestinal casts or as grayish discoloration. Loss of surface epithelial cells and villous atrophy in the small intestine due to the first generation of meronts and severe diffuse crypt Figure 8. Massive infiltration of macro and microgamots and oocysts into epithelia in a lamb (Takla, 1992). 18 812042_Baycox_TechManual_engl.indd 18 27.01.2009 8:28:47 Uhr hyperplasia in the small and large intestine due to pro-gamonts were observed in histopathological examinations. Massive infiltration of macro and microgamots and oocysts into epithelia of the intestine in a lamb were reported by Takla (1992) and presented in the figure 8. Giant meronts in the large intestinal mucosa due to Eimeria ovinoidalis to be seen in the figure 9. the inoculum. Even 1000 oocysts of each species caused diarrhea. The pathogenic effect was attributed mainly E. ovinoidalis. Hemorrhagic intestines due to Eimeria ovinoidalis coccidiosis in sheep were presented in the figure 10. Figure 10. Hemorrhagic intestines due to E. ovinoidalis. Caecum of a lamb that died of coccidiosis (Crown copyright – picture supplied by Prof Mike Taylor) Figure 9. Eimeria ovinoidalis. Large intestinal mucosa with giant meronts (Crown copyright – picture supplied by Prof Mike Taylor) In an experimental study of Gregory et al. (1989), no pathogenic effect was detected in lambs when 104 oocysts of each species E. crandallis and E. ovinoidalis were inoculated before 72 h of age. However at 4 weeks of age the combined inoculum caused diarrhea and weight loss, the severity being roughly proportional to the size of Coccidiosis impacts the weight gain of lambs as in other animals. Effect of different doses of sporulated oocysts of E. crandallis and E. ovinoidalis on weight gain in lamb was studied by Gregory et al. (1989) and presented in figure 11. 19 812042_Baycox_TechManual_engl.indd 19 27.01.2009 8:28:50 Uhr Body weight AS¬% of weight of inoculation 140 500 135 130 1000 125 5 000 120 10 000 115 15 000 110 One lamb died 105 100 0 6 14 16 19 Days after inoculation (Gregory et al. 1989) Figure 11. Body weight of lambs (as % of weight on inoculation) inoculated at about 5 weeks of age with different doses of oocysts of both Eimeria crandallis and Eimeria ovinoidalis (Gregory et al. 1989). Figure 12. Pasty faeces from a lamb with coccidiosis 20 812042_Baycox_TechManual_engl.indd 20 27.01.2009 8:28:54 Uhr Diagnosis A: Diagnostic methods Faeces samples from lambs (pasty (Figure 12) or watery) can be taken directly from rectum. Most of the ovine Eimeria spp. can be differentiated by an experienced examiner by the morphology of the unsporulated oocysts. For the species E. crandallis and E. weybridgensis this is not possible and therefore they are differentiated by the shape and position of the sporocysts and sporozoites. Additionally E. parva and E. pallida are difficult to separate from each other because of their similarity and therefore sporulated oocysts can be helpful. a) Sporulation of faeces • Weigh 4 g of faeces in a petri dish, flatten it and add 2% potassium dichromate solution (K2Cr2O7) to avoid overgrowth with fungi and bacteria • Store the samples at room temperature with daily aeration, because oxygen is necessary for sporulation of oocysts; if possible permanent aeration is advisable • Examine the faeces according to section b) b) Examination of faeces using a modified McMaster-Method • Oocysts of coccidia float on the surface of a salt solution and are concentrated there • Flotation solutions: - solution of ZnSO4, specific gravity 1,30 g/ml - solution of sugar (sucrose), specific gravity 1,28 g/ml - saturated solution of NaCl, specific gravity 1,18 - 1,20 g/m 21 812042_Baycox_TechManual_engl.indd 21 27.01.2009 8:29:06 Uhr • Principle: Flotation of nematode eggs/oocysts of coccidia in a counting chamber. The oocysts float to just below the upper glass while the debris sinks to the floor of the counting chamber. The oocysts are therefore clearly in focus and may be counted under a defined grid • The unit is the number of oocysts per gram of faeces = OPG • Weigh out 4 g (or the complete amount of the faeces in the petri dish) of faeces into small plastic bowls and suspend them in 15 ml saturated NaCl solution; if the faecal sample consists of pellets use a mortar and pestle instead • pass the solution through a tea strainer and a funnel into a 100 ml graduated cylinder • fill up the cylinder with saturated NaCl solution to 60 ml • if it is not possible to collect 4 g of faeces the amount of saturated salt solution should be adapted (e.g. 2 g faeces – 30 ml NaCl solution) • add a magnetic rod and mix the suspension with a magnetic stirrer for about 2 min at highest turning speed • remove two portions of about 1 ml from the central vortex with a pipette, discarding the first drop each time McMaster Slides 22 812042_Baycox_TechManual_engl.indd 22 27.01.2009 8:29:14 Uhr c) Method for concentration and washing of oocysts • Suspend the faeces containing the oocysts in water, It may be necessary to use a mortar and pestle 1 • transfer the rest of each portion into one of the chambers of a McMaster slide, avoid air bubbles • 2 min flotation • examine under the microscope at magnification of x63, x100 or x160 (depending on the size of the parasite stages) • Evaluation: • Sensitivity of this method: 50 OPG Mean number of oocysts counted in both areas of the chamber multiplied by 100 is the oocyst count per gram of faeces [OPG] = mean × 100 • Pass the suspension through a strainer into 200 ml centrifuge glasses and centrifuge them at 3000 rounds per minute (rpm, = 2010 x g, Figs. 1-3) 2 23 812042_Baycox_TechManual_engl.indd 23 27.01.2009 8:29:26 Uhr 3 5 4 • Discard the supernatant (Figs. 3 and 4) • Fill the centrifuge glasses with saturated NaCl solution (or another flotation medium) and stir up the sediment until there are no more clots of sediment (Fig. 5) • Another centrifugation (flotation of oocysts) • Collect the liquid from the surface using a pipette (with the floating oocysts) in a graduated 1,5-2 l beaker containing 100 ml of water (Figs. 6 and 7) 6 • Monitor the amount of oocysts left in a centrifuge glass by examining a drop from the surface under the microscope, if there are many oocysts left, collect them again 24 812042_Baycox_TechManual_engl.indd 24 27.01.2009 8:29:34 Uhr 8 7 • Dilute the collected oocyst suspension with water 1:5 (for example 200 ml oocyst suspension are filled up to 1000 ml) • The diluted oocyst suspension is now filled in 50 ml Falcon-tubes and centrifuged as described (Fig. 8) • Discard the supernatant, stir up the sediment, fill up with either oocyst suspension that is left or with water, and centrifuge again (Figs. 8 and 9) • The two former steps are repeated two times with water in order to wash the oocysts 9 25 812042_Baycox_TechManual_engl.indd 25 27.01.2009 8:29:39 Uhr • Stir up the sediment of the last centrifugation with 2% potassium dichromate solution and store the solution in petri dishes at room temperature and regular aeration • The oocysts can be differentiated after the appropriate sporulation time (4-5 days should be sufficient) • Examine at least 100 sporulated oocysts to determine the proportion of Eimeria species in the faecal sample d) Criteria to determine the Eimeria species by their oocysts • Oocyst size (small, medium, big) • Oocyst shape (round, subspherical, ellipsoidal, cylindrical, ovoidal, pyriform, tapering at one pole) • Oocyst wall • Colour (colourless, pale yellow, yellowish-brown, brown) • Surface (smooth, granular, with protuberances, with striation) • Micropyle (yes/no/inconspicuous) • Polar cap (yes/no) • Oocyst and sporocyst residuum (yes/no) • Sporocyst shape (broad, ellipsoidal, citron-like, elongate) • Position of sporozoites in the sporocyst (lying head to tail or end to end) Scheme of sporulated oocyst: Polar body Polar cap Oocyst wall Outer wall Inner wall hyaline (=refractile bodies Micropyle Stieda body Sporocyst residuum Sporocyst Sporozoites 26 812042_Baycox_TechManual_engl.indd 26 27.01.2009 8:29:44 Uhr B: Ovine Eimeria species 1. Oocysts without a polar cap a) Eimeria ovinoidalis • Inconspicuous micropyle • Sporocysts elongate to ovoidal • Sporozoites lying head to tail in sporocyst • No Stieda body and no polar body b) Eimeria parva • no micropyle • sporocysts broad to ovoidal • sporozoites lying head to tail in sporocyst • No Stieda body and no polar body Sporulated Sporulated Nonsporulated Nonsporulated 27 812042_Baycox_TechManual_engl.indd 27 27.01.2009 8:29:45 Uhr c) Eimeria pallida • No micropyle • Sporocysts elongate to ovoidal • Sporozoites lying head to tail in sporocyst • No Stieda body • Polar body may be absent d) Eimeria faurei • Distinct micropyle • Sporocysts ovoidal • Sporozoites lying head to tail in sporocyst • Stieda body and polar body present Nonsporulated Sporulated Nonsporulated 28 812042_Baycox_TechManual_engl.indd 28 27.01.2009 8:29:52 Uhr 2. Oocysts with a polar cap: e) Eimeria marsica • Polar cap indistinct or absent • Micropyle inconspicuous • Sporocysts elongate to ellipsoidal • Sporozoites lying head to tail in sporocysts • Stieda body and polar body present f) Eimeria crandallis • Micropyle present • Polar cap may be absent • Sporocysts broad to ellipsoidal, citron-like • Sporozoites lying end to end in sporocysts (contrary to those of E. weybridgensis) • No Stieda body, but polar body present Sporulated Sporulated ! Sporulated oocysts of Eimeria crandallis need to be differentiated from oocysts of of E. weybridgensis! Sporulated 29 812042_Baycox_TechManual_engl.indd 29 27.01.2009 8:29:57 Uhr g) Eimeria weybridgensis • Sporocysts elongate to ovoidal • Sporozoites lying head to tail (contrary to those of E. crandallis) • No Stieda body present • Polar body present h) Eimeria bakuensis • Micropyle present • Sporocysts elongate to ellipsoidal • Sporozoites lying head to tail in sporocyst • No Stieda body present • Polar body present Sporulated Sporulated ! Sporulated oocysts of E. weybridgensis need to be differentiated from oocysts of of Eimeria crandallis! Nonsporulated 30 812042_Baycox_TechManual_engl.indd 30 27.01.2009 8:30:03 Uhr i) Eimeria ahsata • Micropyle with distinct polar cap • Sporocysts elongate • Sporozoites lying head to tail in sporocyst • No Stieda body present • Polar body present j) Eimeria granulosa • Micropyle at the broad end of oocyst, with distinct polar cap • Sporocysts elongate to ovoidal • Sporozoites lying head to tail in sporocyst • Stieda body and polar body present Sporulated Sporulated Nonsporulated 31 812042_Baycox_TechManual_engl.indd 31 27.01.2009 8:30:10 Uhr k) Eimeria punctata • Micropyle with polar cap • wall with conspicuous, uniform, cone-shaped pits (0.5 µm in diameter) • Sporocysts elongate to ovoidal • Sporozoites lying head to tail in sporocyst • Stieda body and polar body present l) Eimeria intricata • Micropyle with distinct polar cap • Thick and striated wall • Sporocysts elongate to ellipsoidal • Sporozoites lying head to tail in sporocyst • Stieda body present • Polar body absent Sporulated Sporulated Nonsporulated Nonsporulated 32 812042_Baycox_TechManual_engl.indd 32 27.01.2009 8:30:22 Uhr Management and control Coccidiosis in sheep flocks is usually associated with overstocking/ crowded conditions and faecal contamination of drinking water or feed. Improved hygienic measurements and sanitation generally reduces the infection rate and the incidence of clinical disease outbreaks. Frequent cleaning of pens and the use of feeders and water containers designed to prevent fecal contamination of feed and water. Feeding silage, hay or corn stalks to the group significantly increases the risk of coccidiosis (Foreyt, 1986). Proper stocking rates reduce the numbers of oocysts as well as reducing stress, which may lower resistance of sheep and exacerbate coccidian infections. Providing a proper diet and adequate shelter will also reduce stress-related coccidiosis. Affected sheep should be isolated, and special care taken on them so that their faeces do not contaminate the feed and water of unaffected sheep.To prevent pasture coccidiosis, animals should not be turned out onto heavily contaminated pastures, especially in the first grazing season. Young animals should be kept off heavily contaminated pastures when they are most susceptible (Taylor and Catchpole, 1994). The eradication of coccidiosis does not seem feasible because of its widespread prevalence, the enormous reproductive potential of the parasite, and the oocysts’ ability to survive in the environment for a long time. Accepting this fact is important to establishing a successful program to control the disease. The overall philosophy of coccidiosis control is to prevent clinical signs of the disease through the use of proper sanitation and the administration of an anticoccidial before anticipated outbreaks. Proper administration of anticoccidial remedies products can significantly reduce or eliminate clinical coccidiosis in sheep (Foreyt, 1986). Normally all lambs in a flock should be treated as even those showing no symptoms are likely to be infected (Taylor, 1995). 33 812042_Baycox_TechManual_engl.indd 33 27.01.2009 8:30:30 Uhr It is important to keep in mind that once lambs have started scouring, anticoccidial therapy will have a limited effect on preventing the consequences of the disease. The setback suffered is virtually impossible to compensate for later. The establishment of programs that combine management strategies, farm hygiene measures and strategic chemotherapeutic intervention is very important for reducing the infection pressure of the parasite and limiting the effects of the disease on the animals. Although Eimeria sp. are resistant to the majority of common disinfectants, there are some reports of a reduction in the number of oocysts when compounds that are able to penetrate the oocyst wall are used (combination of phenolic and alcoholic compounds or ammonia in a 50% solution). A typical bedding for indoor sheep flocks Grazing lamb 34 812042_Baycox_TechManual_engl.indd 34 27.01.2009 8:30:30 Uhr A single oral application of Baycox® 5% at a dose rate of 20 mg/kg prevents clinical coccidiosis, weight gain reduction and reduces oocysts shedding. Toltrazuril does not interfere with the natural immunity and allows animals to build up natural immunity because it does not kill the extra cellular living stages (sporozoites and merazoites) thereby allowing them to attach to mucosal cells for the induction of immunitiy. For example, decoquinate and monensin are active ingredients which kill the extracellular stage of coccidia such as sporozoites and merazoites. 35 812042_Baycox_TechManual_engl.indd 35 27.01.2009 8:30:40 Uhr Baycox® 5% (Toltrazuril) for Lambs Active Ingredient International Nonproprietary Name (INN) Toltrazuril (generic name) Composition Each ml of Baycox® 5% contains 50 mg of toltrazuril. Chemical name: 1-[3-methyl-4(41-trifluoromethylthiophenoxy) phenyl]-3-methyl-1,3,5triazine-2,4,6- (1H,3H,5H)-trione or 1-Metyl-3-[4-[p[(trifluoromethyl)thio]phenoxy]-mtolyl]- s-triazine-2,4,6(1H,3H,5H)trione Molecular formula: C18H14F3N3O4S Structural formula: Molecular weight: 425.38 36 812042_Baycox_TechManual_engl.indd 36 27.01.2009 8:30:40 Uhr Spectrum of Activity Toltrazuril is active against various coccidia species in mammals (cattle and pig) and birds (poultry), including Eimeria crandallis and Eimeria ovinoidalis in sheep. Mode of Action Clinical and electron microscopical studies show that toltrazuril is active against all intracellular development stages of coccidia, including schizonts, microgamonts and macrogamonts. It interferes with division of the protozoal nucleus, the activity of the mitochondria, and damages the wall-forming bodies in the microgametes. Toltrazuril produces severe vacualisation of the protozoal endoplasmic reticulum in all intracellular development stages and the type of action is anticoccidial (data on file). Pharmacokinetics After oral administration toltrazuril is slowly absorbed in mammals. The main metabolite is characterised as toltrazuril sulfone. The maximal plasma concentration (Cmax = 62 mg/L) was observed 2 days following oral administration. The elimination of toltrazuril is slow with an elimination half-life time of approximately 9 days. The major route of excretion is via the faeces. Amounts to be administered and administration route Each animal should be treated with a single oral dose of 20 mg toltrazuril/ kg body weight corresponding to 0.4 ml oral suspension per kg body weight. To obtain maximum benefit, animals should be treated before the expected onset of clinical signs, i.e. in the prepatent period. If animals are to be treated collectively rather than individually, they should be grouped according to their body weight and dosed accordingly, in order to avoid under- or overdosing. 37 812042_Baycox_TechManual_engl.indd 37 27.01.2009 8:30:45 Uhr Adverse reactions None known Interactions with other medicinal products and other forms of interaction None known Other special information Laboratory studies in rat and rabbit have not produced any evidence of a teratogenic, foetotoxic or maternotoxic effect. Other special information No signs of overdose have been observed in target animal safety studies with threefold overdose at a single treatment and twofold overdose at treatment on two consecutive days. Withdrawal periods Please follow the instruction of your local authority for withdrawal period. Presentation Baycox® 5% is available in different packages to suit local market conditions. Please contact your local Bayer office for details on pack size and type. Storage conditions Keep out of reach of children and uninformed persons. Treatment Time The timing of a preventive treatment depends normally on the farm history and on the rearing system such as indoor (inhouse or intensive rearing) and outdoor (grazing and extensive rearing) system. And relocation of lambs to contaminated paddocks within a herd is also a depending factor for the timing of a preventive treatment. The prepatent period (the time from uptake of infection/oocysts to the start of oocyst excretion) is variable among different Eimeria sp. in sheep. This period must be taken into account when the treatment initiated. The most important and pathogenic Eimeria sp. such as Eimeria crandallis and Eimeria ovinoidalis have a prepatent period of 15-20 days and 12-15 days respectively. Therefore preventive treatment of lambs should be initiated before the expected onset of disease and before the first oocysts are seen in the feces. It is evident from the life cycle of the parasite that the asexual and sexual phases inflict severe damage to the intestine, and oocysts are excreted after the 38 812042_Baycox_TechManual_engl.indd 38 27.01.2009 8:30:45 Uhr damage has already been done. The intestinal damage during the prepatent period can be severe. The timing of therapeutic control is important for achieving optimal results. Treatment during the prepatent period ensures that animals will not suffer clinical disease. Treatment after oocysts are seen in the faeces would only prevent further deterioration of disease. Coccidiosis is dynamic and insidious on a farm where different animals are at different stages of disease development (depending on the infective dose and time of infection). However, one can deduce the suitable time of treatment (approximately one week before anticipated clinical signs) depending on the history of the farm and prior coccidiosis episodes. The mechanism of action (activity against all intracellular development stages of coccidia) and kinetic behaviour of Baycox® (persistency in the body) give a long lasting window ensuring that most of the developing stages of the parasites are killed and animals do not suffer clinical signs. Furthermore, Baycox® not only controls coccidia infection without impairing the ability of animals to acquire immunity, thus promoting resistance to reinfection (Steinfelder et al., 2005). The following points should be taken into account when controlling and managing coccidiosis in a sheep flock: Diarrhoea or poor performers in your flock? Suspect coccidiosis • Flock history of watery or haemorrhagic diarrhoea unresponsive to antibiotic treatment. • Diarrhoea associated with pasturing (around 2 weeks after pasturing). • Diarrhoea associated with management practices: indoor intensive management requires special care. • Poor weight gain and retarded growth. 39 812042_Baycox_TechManual_engl.indd 39 27.01.2009 8:30:45 Uhr Diagnosis of the disease • Faecal examination for OPG and identification of pathogenic Eimeria species (E. crandallis, E. ovinoidalis) in the laboratory with the appropriate test. • Pre-patent period varies between Eimeria species: E. crandallis 15 - 20 days E. ovinoidalis 12 - 15 days Take faeces samples directly from the rectum in suspected lambs in 2 or 3 weeks after relocation in contaminated paddocks or pasturing. Examine the faeces according to the procedure in the chapter diagnosis. • Administer a single oral treatment of Baycox® 5% based on 20 mg/kg toltrazuril to the lambs. • When the animals are treated after exhibiting clinical signs and recover the damage already inflicted to the intestine still affects the production parameters. This can be prevented with a metaphylactic treatment of the animals during the prepatent period. • It is advisable to establish metaphylactic programmes in the flocks to avoid the detrimental effects on intestinal mucosa and high costs related to coccidiosis. Set up a treatment schedule for the flock • Adjust the time of treatment of the flock according to the management practices (indoor management, outdoor management, pasturing, etc.), the coccidia species present in the flock and the history of onset of diarrhoea. • To prevent the losses associated with coccidiosis treatment should be given before clinical signs appear. 40 812042_Baycox_TechManual_engl.indd 40 27.01.2009 8:30:46 Uhr Efficacy Trials Clinical trials: Naturally infected lambs have been treated with toltrazuril 20 mg/kg BW 10 days after turn out onto pasture. The oocyst excretion was observed up until 9 weeks of age vs an untreated control group (Taylor and Kenny, 1988). Treatment with Baycox significantly controlled the oocyst excretion during the course of the study (5 weeks). The results have been presented in the figure 13. % lambs with positive OPG in each group (100 % equivalent to 137,897 opg) Figure 13. Efficacy of Baycox for the control of natural coccidiosis in lambs (Taylor and Kenny, 1988; modif.) 41 812042_Baycox_TechManual_engl.indd 41 27.01.2009 8:30:46 Uhr The metaphylactic efficacy of toltrazuril was studied by Gjerde and Helle (1991) in Norway. Seven to 9 days after turnout on pasture lambs were treated with toltrazuril at 20 mg/kg to prevent coccidiosis. Treatment with Baycox reduced the oocysts output significantly and prevented the development of diarrhoea and improved weight gain during the first 4 – 5 weeks after treatment. Results have been presented in figures 14 – 17. Figure 14. Effect of one toltrazuril treatment (20 mg/kg) on day 7 or 10 after turn out on the fecal oocyst out put of lambs naturally infected with coccidian (Gjerde and Helle, 1991). *: anthelmintic treatment on the weekly basis (5 mg/kg febantel), OPG: oocysts per gram feces Stafford et al. (1994) studied the efficacy of weekly treatment with Baycox in a group of 2-6 weeks old suckling twin lambs in New Zealand. One of each set of twins was treated with Baycox (20 mg toltrazuril /kgBW) per os. Faecel samples were collected per rectum from each lamb once weekly for the first 6 weeks and thereafter at 14-day intervals. All lambs were treated with a levamisole-based anthelmintic at week 2 and week 6. The mean oocysts count and liveweight were calculated on a weekly basis for the treatment and control groups. Treatment with Baycox provided significantly reduced OPG and generally better weight gain development during the course of the study. The mean liveweight of the control and treated groups at the beginning of the trial was 7,9 and 8,0 kg respectively and at the end of the trial 19,8 and 21,0 kg. The difference in the 42 812042_Baycox_TechManual_engl.indd 42 27.01.2009 8:30:46 Uhr Figure 15. Daily weight gain development in lambs treated with toltrazuril or toltrazuril + anthelmintic on day 7 after turnout to pasture (Gjerde and Helle, 1991). Figure 16. Effect of a single toltrazuril (Baycox) treatment (on day 7 or 10 after turnout) on faecal consistency (diarrhoea score) of lambs naturally infected with coccidian (Gjerde and Helle 1991). 43 812042_Baycox_TechManual_engl.indd 43 27.01.2009 8:30:47 Uhr overall weight gain between the control and treated group 11,9 and 13,0 kg respectively, was significant (p<0,05). Results were presented in figure 18 – 19. In a commercial sheep farm in France, lambs (n:25 in each group) were treated with Baycox 5% (20 mg/kg bw toltrazuril) and diclazuril (1 mg/kg bw). An other group of lambs served untreated control group. The lambs were kept with their mother in one of sheepfold under same condition and they were 10-14 days old when were treated with one of the drug above. The prevalence of oocysts excretion, OPG and daily weight gain were determined during the course of the study (Fig 20, 21 and 22 and table 5). Metaphylactic treatment with Baycox 5% significantly reduced enviromental contamination with oocysts and improved weight gain in comparison to an untreated control and a matched diclazuril-treated group of animals, demonstrating the beneficial effects of this treatment in subclinical or mild coccidiosis in young lambs. Study has been accepted for the publication in Parasitology Research (Le sueur et al. 2008). Figure 17. Effect of a single toltrazuril treatment 7 days after turnout on faecal consistency (diarrhea score) of lambs naturally infected with coccidian (Gjerde and Helle 1991). 44 812042_Baycox_TechManual_engl.indd 44 27.01.2009 8:30:48 Uhr Figure 18. The mean OPG of 43 sets of twin lambs, one of which was treated with Baycox (20 mg/kg) once weekly (Baycox group) and one of which was in an untreated control group (Stafford et al. 1994). Figure 19. The mean live weight of 43 sets of twin lambs, one of which was treated with Baycox (20 mg/kg) once weekly and one of which was in an untreated control group (Stafford et al. 1994). 45 812042_Baycox_TechManual_engl.indd 45 27.01.2009 8:30:48 Uhr Fig 20. Excretion prevalences during the study in the untreated control group, the diclazuril-treated group and Baycox 5% (toltrazuril) treated group (Le sueur et al. 2008). Fig 21. Average oocysts excretion in the groups treated with diclazuril, Baycox 5% and control group during the course of sampling given as LN (OPG+1) (Le sueur et al. 2008). 46 812042_Baycox_TechManual_engl.indd 46 27.01.2009 8:30:49 Uhr Fig 22. Daily weight gain of lambs in control, Baycox 5% and Diclazuril groups during study days 0 - 60 (Le sueur et al. 2008). Table 5. Qualitative and quantitative oocyst excretion in the groups treated with diclazuril, Baycox 5% and control group (Le sueur et al. 2008). Group n Excretion at least once (%) Average excretion days in % (minimum-maximum) Mean OPG x 103 (maximum OPG x 103) Control 25 100 49.5 (25-83.3) 526 (16074) Diclazuril 25 92 25.3 (0.0- 50) 21 (1278) Baycox 5% 25 68 12.8 (0.0 – 33.3) 5.2 (1226) 47 812042_Baycox_TechManual_engl.indd 47 27.01.2009 8:30:49 Uhr References 1. Ambrosi, M.; Pergilli Fioretti, D.; Mechelli, L. (1982): Distribution of coccidia in sheep in Umbria. Atti della Societa Italiana delle Scienze Veterinaria, 36, 657-659. 2. Ajayi, J. A. and Todd, A. C. (1977): Prevalence of ovine coccidian in two University of Wisconsin farms and the prepatent periods of eight species. Bulletein of Animal Health and Production in Africa, 25 (3), 257-261. 3. 4. Arslan, M.Ö.; Umur, S.; Kara, M. (1999): The prevalence of coccidian species in sheep in Kars province of Turkey. Torp Anim Health and Produc, 31, 161-165. Arru, E.; Leoni, A.; Garippa, G. (1984): coccidiosis in small ruminants. Atti della Societa Italiana delle Scienze Veterinarie. Vol 38, 755-758. 5. Barutzki, D.; Marquardt, S.; Gothe, R. (1989): Oozysten Ausscheidung bei Schafen. Vet. Med., 4 (2), 26-30. 6. Barutzki, D.; Marquardt, S.; Gothe, R. (1990): Eimeria infections of sheep in northwest Germany. Vet. Parasitol. 37, 79-82. 7. Bauer, C. (1989): Infection with Nematodirus battus (CROFTON und THOMAS, 1951) and outbreak of eimeriosis in suckling lambs on pasture in Germany (case report). Dtsch. tierärztl. Wschr.,7, 382-384. 8. Berriatua, E.; Green, L.E.; Morgan, K.L. (1994): A descriptive epidemiological study of coccidiosis in early lambing housed flocks. Vet. Parasitol, 54, 337-351. 9. Chroust, K.; Horak, F.; Zizlavsky, J.; Zizlavsla, S (1998): The course and control of parasitoses in mixed grazing of sheep and cattle. Vet. Med. (Praque), 43 (5), 153-159. 10. Epe, C.; Coati, N.; Schneider T. (2004): Results of parasitological examinations of feacal samples from horses, ruminanats, pigs, dogs, cats, hedgehogs and rabbits between 1998 and 2002. Dtsch. tierärztl. Wschr. 111 (6), 243-247. 11. Fitzgerald, P.R. (1980): The economic impact of coccidiosis in domestic animals. Adv. Vet. Med. and Comp. Med. 24, 121-143 12. Foreyt, W. J. (1986): Epidemiology and control of coccidian in sheep. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food animal Practice. 2 (2), 383-388. 13. Gomez, S., Gozal, A., Lopez-Guerrero, E., Rojo-Vazquez, F.A. (1998): A parasitological survey of sheep flocks on Mallorca island. Medicina Veterinaria, 15 _(9) 483-489. 14. Gregory, M.W.; Joyner, P.; and Catchpole, C.C. (1980): Ovine coccidiosis in England and Wales1978-1979. Vet. Rec., 31, 461-462. 15. Gregory, M.W.; Catchpole, C.C.; and Joyner, P. (1989): Epidemiology of ovine coccidiosis: Effect of management at lambing. Vet Rec., 27, 561 – 562. 48 812042_Baycox_TechManual_engl.indd 48 27.01.2009 8:30:50 Uhr 16. Gregory, M.W.; Catchpole, J.; Nolan, A.; Nancy Hebert, C. (1989): Ovine Coccidiosis : studies on the pathogenicity of Eimeria ovinoidalis and E. crandallis in conventionally-reared lambs, including possible effects of passive immunity. Dtsch. tierärztl. Wschr., 96, 285-332. 17. Gregory, M.W.; Catchpole, J.; Nolan, A.; Pittilo, R.M. (1987): Syncronised division of coccidian and host cells in the ovine intestine. Parasitol. Res. 73, 384-386. 18. Gjerde, B. and Helle, H (1991): Chemoprophylaxis of coccidiosis in lambs with a single oral dose of toltrazuril. Vet. Parasitol. 38, 97-107. 19. Gül, A. (2007): Prevalence of Eimeria species in Bitlis Province. Turkish society for parasitology.31 (1), 20-24. 20. Gregory, M. W., and Catcpole, J. (1990): Ovine coccidiosis: The pathology of Eimeria crandallis infection. International Journal for Parasitology, 20 (7), 849-860. 21. Gorski, P.; Niznikowski, R.; Popielarczyk, D.; Strzelec, E.; Gajewska, A.; Weddrychowicz, H. (2004): Natural parasitic infections in various breeds of sheep in Poland. Archiv für Tierzucht, 47, 50-55. 22. Helle, O. (1970): Winter resistant oocysts in the pasture as a source of coccidial infection in lambs. Acta Vet. Scand. 11, 545-564 23. Hidalgo-Agüello, M.R.; and CorderoDel-Campillo, M. (1987): Quantity of Eimeria spp. oocyst elimination in sheep. Angew.Parasitol.28, 7-14 24. Horton-Smith, C. and P.L. Long (1954): Preliminary observations on the physical conditions of build up of litter and possible effect on the parasite populations. Proc. 10th World’s Poultry Congr., Edinburgh, UK, 266-272 25. Hovarti, G. and Varga, I. (1986): A survey of ovine coccidiosis in Hungary. Magyar Allatorvosok Lapja, vol. 41 (No 5), 297-3300. 26. Jelonova, I.; Holasova, E.; Pavlasek, I (1990): Effect of different farming technologies on the prevelance of endoparasites in sheep. Veterinarstvi, 40 (7), 307 – 310. 27. Kaya, G. (2004): Prevalence of Eimeria species in lambs in Antakya Province. Turk. J Vet. Anim. Sci., 28, 687-692. 28. Le Sueur, C. ; Mage, C. ; Mundt, H-C. (2007): Field study on the efficacy of toltrazuril (Baycox 5% suspension) against natural infections with pathogenic Eimeria spp. in sheep-pen lambs. Data on file (unpublished). 29. Le Sueur, C. ; Mage, C. ; Mundt, H-C. (2008): Efficacy of toltrazuril (Baycox 5% suspension) in natural infections with pathogenic eimeria spp. in housed lambs. Accepted for the publication in Parasitology Research. 49 812042_Baycox_TechManual_engl.indd 49 27.01.2009 8:30:51 Uhr 30. Mahrt, J.L., and Sherrick, G.W. (1965): Coccidiosis due to Eimeria ahsata in feedlot lambs in Illinois. J Am Vet Assoc., 146, 1415-1416. 31. Mage, C. et al. (1995): Coccidiose subclinique chez des agneaux de bergerie: prevention avec le décoquinate. GTV 1995-1-OV-171, 59-64. 32. McKenna, P.B. (1972): the identity and prevalence of coccidian species in sheep and cattle in New Zealand. New Zealand Veterinary Journal, Volume 20 (12), 225-228. 33. Nakai, Y. and Morizane, K. (1990): The coccidian oocysts of Blackbelly Barbados sheep. Japanese journal of zootechnical Science, 61 (11), 1023-1027. 34. Nahed-Toral, J.; Lopez-Tirado, Q.; Mendoza-Martinez, G.; Aluja-Schunemann, A.; Frigo-Tavera, F. J. (2003): Epidemiology of parasitosis in the Tzotzil sheep production system. Small Ruminant Research, 49 (2), 199-206. 35. Nowasad, B.; Malczeewski, A.; Skaska, M.; Fudalewicz-Niemcyk, W.; Gawor, J. (2002): The influence of different management system on the infection level of some gastrointestinal parasites in sheep in southern Poland. Wiadomosci Parazytologiczne, 46 (2), 245-264. 36. Orgeur, P.; Mavric, N.; Yvore, P.; Bernard, S.; Nowak, R.; Schaal, B.; Levy, F. (1998): Artificial weaning in sheep: consequences on behavioural, hormonal and immune-pathological indicators of welfare. Applied Animal Behavioural Science, 58, 87-103. 37. Pellerdy, L.P (1974): Coccidia and Coccidiosis, second ed. Paul Parey, Berlin, p. 959. 38. Pfister, K. and Flury, B. (1985): Kokzidiose beim Schaf. Schweiz Arch. Tierheilk. 127, 433-441. 39. Platzer, B.; Prosl, H.; Cieslicki, M.; Joachim, A. (2005): Epidemiology of Eimeria infections in an Australian milking sheep flock and control with diclazuril. Vet Parasitol 129, 1-9. 40. Reeg, K.J.; Gauly, M.; Bauer, C.; Mertens, C.; Erhardt, G.; Zahner, H. (2005): Coccidial infections in housed lambs: oocyst excretion, antibody levels and genetic influences on the infection. Vet. Parasitol 127, 209-219. 41. Rommel, M. (2000): Protozoaeninfektionen der Wiederkäuer (Rind, Schaf, Ziege), Eimeriose (Coccidiose). In : Rommel, M., Eckert, J., Kutzer, E., Körtig, W., Schnieder, T. (Eds), Veterinärmedizinische Parasitologie: fifth ed. Paul Parey, Berlin, pp. 133-149. 42. Schneider, D.; Ayeni, A.O. and Dürr, U. (1972): Sammelreferat: Zur physikalischen Resistenz der Kokzidienoocysten (Review: Physical resistance of coccidian oocysts). Dtsch. tierärztl. Wschr., 79, 545-572 43. Silva, T.; Facury, E. J.; Ferreira, P. M.; Carvalho, A. U. (2008): Dynamics of Eimeria spp natural infections in Santa 50 812042_Baycox_TechManual_engl.indd 50 27.01.2009 8:30:51 Uhr Inês lambs reared under semi-intensive exploitation condition at the north of Minas Gerais State, Brazil. World Buiatrics Congress 2008, Budapest, Hungary, July 6-11. 44. Stafford, K. J.; West, D.M.; Vermunt, J.J.; Pomroy, W.; Adlington, B.A and Calder, S.M (1994): The effect of repeated doses of totrazuril on coccidial oocyst output and weight gain in suckling lambs. New Zealand Veterinary Journal, 42, 117 – 119. 45. Steinfelder, S.; Lucius, R.; Greif, G; and Pogonka, T. (2005): Treatment of mice with the anticoccidial drug Toltrazuril does not interfere with the development of a specific cellular intestinal immune response to Eimeria falciformis. Parasitol Res. 97 (6), 458-465 50. Taylor, M. (1995): Diagnosis and control of coccidíosis in sheep. In practice, April, 172-177. 51. Taylor, S.M. ; Kenny, J. (1988): Coccidial efficacy of a single treatment of toltrazuril in naturally infected lambs. Vet. Rec.,123, 573. 52. Taylor, M.A. and J. Catchpole (1994): Coccidiosis of domestic ruminants. Appl. Parasitol. 35, 73. 53. Yvore, P. ; Esnault, A. (1987): Les coccidioses en elevage ovin.-Bull. Groupements Techn.Vet. 3, 47-51. 46. Tafti, A. K. and Mansourian, M. (2008): Pathological lesions of naturally occurring coccidiosis in sheep and goats. Comp. Clin. Pathol., DOI 10.1007/s00580-008-0719-1. 47. Takla, M. (1992): Diagnostischer Beitrag zur Kokzidiose beim Schaf. Der Praktischer Tierarzt, 10, 959-965. 48. Tontis, A.; Häfeli, W. (1985): Darmpolpen bei kleinen Ruminanten mit chronischer Kokzidiose. Schweiz.Arch. Tierheilk.127,401-405. 49. Taylor, M.A.; Coop, R.L.; Wall, R.L. (2007): Veterinary Parasitology. Sheep coccidia. Third Edition. Page 175-184. 51 812042_Baycox_TechManual_engl.indd 51 27.01.2009 8:30:51 Uhr International Edition (First Edition, December 2008) Product may not be available in all countries Bayer Animal Health GmbH 51368 Leverkusen, Germany 52 812042_Baycox_TechManual_engl.indd 52 27.01.2009 8:30:52 Uhr
© Copyright 2024