Continuing Education Course Number: 142 Management of Fluorosis Using Macro- and Microabrasion Authored by Howard E. Strassler, DMD; Autumn Griffin, DDS; and Margrit Maggio, DMD Upon successful completion of this CE activity 2 CE credit hours may be awarded A Peer-Reviewed CE Activity by Dentistry Today, Inc, is an ADA CERP Recognized Provider. ADA CERP is a service of the American Dental Association to assist dental professionals in indentifying quality providers of continuing dental education. ADA CERP does not approve or endorse individual courses or instructors, nor does it imply acceptance of credit hours by boards of dentistry. Concerns or complaints about a CE provider may be directed to the provider or to ADA CERP at ada.org/goto/cerp. Approved PACE Program Provider FAGD/MAGD Credit Approval does not imply acceptance by a state or provincial board of dentistry or AGD endorsement. June 1, 2009 to May 31, 2012 AGD Pace approval number: 309062 Opinions expressed by CE authors are their own and may not reflect those of Dentistry Today. Mention of specific product names does not infer endorsement by Dentistry Today. Information contained in CE articles and courses is not a substitute for sound clinical judgment and accepted standards of care. Participants are urged to contact their state dental boards for continuing education requirements. Continuing Education Recommendations for Fluoride Varnish Use in Caries Management INTRODUCTION Management of Fluorosis Using Macro- and Microabrasion Effective Date: 10/1/2011 Water fluoridation is considered to be one of the significant public health measures of the 20th century.1 During tooth development, fluoride becomes incorporated into the enamel matrix as fluorapatite, making the enamel more resistant to acid attack by bacteria and subsequent tooth demineralization. Further, fluoride is protective of enamel for erupted teeth through an equilibrium of demineralizationremineralization during early caries formation. Through the use of water fluoridation there has been a significant decline in dental caries in the United States.2 Despite the evidence that supports the benefits of fluoride in caries prevention, when higher than necessary levels of fluoride are present, enamel fluorosis can pose an aesthetic problem for some patients. This article will discuss enamel fluorosis, the aesthetic challenges it can present for certain patients, and a conservative aesthetic treatment modality for a patient who presented with mild to moderate fluorosis. Expiration Date: 10/1/2013 LEARNING OBJECTIVES After reading this article, the individual will learn: • How fluoride is protective of enamel in the carious process. • Definition, categories, and clinical appearance of enamel fluorosis. • A technique for treating enamel fluorosis using micro- and macroabrasion. ABOUT THE AUTHORS Dr. Strassler is a professor, in the Division of Operative Dentistry, Department of Endodontics, Prosthodontics and Operative Dentistry, University of Maryland Dental School, Baltimore, Md. He can be reached via e-mail at [email protected]. ENAMEL FLUOROSIS Dental fluorosis is defined as hypomineralization of enamel resulting from excessive ingestion of fluoride during tooth development. It is characterized by diffuse opacities on the enamel surface. These are differentiated from other conditions by the characteristic bilaterally symmetric distribution of the enamel defects. The degree to which the enamel is affected is dependent upon the duration, timing, and intensity of the fluoride concentration.1,3 In its mild form, most commonly the teeth present with small white streaks and the enamel appears mottled (Figure 1). As the severity of the condition increases, black and brown stains develop. Moderate fluorosis will demonstrate white Disclosure: Dr. Strassler reports no disclosures. Dr. Griffin is a resident in the general practice dental residency, New Haven Hospital, Yale University, New Haven, Conn. She can be reached at [email protected]. Disclosure: Dr. Griffin reports no disclosures. Dr. Maggio is an assistant professor, clinician educator and the director of operative dentistry, Department of Preventive and Restorative Sciences, University of Pennsylvania School of Dental Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa. She can be reached at [email protected]. Figure 1. An example of mild fluorosis discoloration. Disclosure: Dr. Maggio reports no disclosures. 1 Continuing Education Management of Fluorosis Using Macro- and Microabrasion streaking with brownish staining (Figure 2). Severe fluorosis has the appearance of very dark brown staining and in some cases enamel surface defects (Figure 3). For a small number of patients, the degree of fluorosis can be an aesthetic concern.3-5 The primary author has found over the years that in many cases, patients with very mild and mild to moderate fluorosis are not aware of the minor discoloration present and have no aesthetic concerns. In those cases where patients have moderate to severe fluorosis, the discoloration can be of aesthetic concern. Fluorosis is a developmental phenomenon of the enamel that presents in both primary and permanent teeth. The origins of fluorosis are not completely understood; however, current research suggests that superfluous amounts of fluoride cause retention of amelogenin proteins in the developing tooth structure, thereby inhibiting enamel maturation. This interference results in porosities in the enamel at the time of tooth eruption. Specifically, recent animal and human studies indicate that the role of fluoride is likely due to its interaction with Ca2+ ions; excess F intake has been shown to indirectly reduce the amount of available Ca2+ ions, which in turn limits the number of calcium-dependent proteases available to remove enamel matrix proteins. This elimination of enamel matrix proteins is necessary for adequate enamel maturation.6-9 Studies in United States school children have reported fluorosis as high as 50% to 60% in the 1980s and in the range of 40% to 48% through the 1990s and 2000s.8,10-14 Dental fluorosis has been evaluated by the US Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and Prevention National Center of Health Statistics using the dental fluorosis classification described by Dean (Table 1). The findings were characterized as unaffected, questionable, very mild, mild, and moderate/severe. From the data reported for dental fluorosis for adolescents and adults from 1999 to 2002, the majority of persons examined were either unaffected or had questionable fluorosis (Table 2). For persons with a diagnosis of dental fluorosis, the rate that was mild was twice as prevalent for 16- to 19-year-olds when compared to 20- to 39year-olds (6.7% versus 3.3%). Moderate/severe fluorosis also was higher for the 16- to 19-year-olds when compared to the 20 to 39 year olds (4.0% versus 1.8%).14 Figure 2. An example of moderate fluorosis staining. Figure 3. An example of severe fluorosis staining and enamel surface defects. MULTIPLE SOURCES OF FLUORIDE Recommendations for fluoride supplements for children and adolescents have been endorsed by the ADA and the Academy of Pediatric Dentistry for many years. In 1994, a change in the recommendations for fluoride supplements based upon the child’s age was made in response to concerns about the increase in the prevalence of fluorosis.1,15,16 These changes are noted in Table 3. The majority of fluoride ingestion is typically thought to be through foods, beverages, and supplements.17-24 Water is the primary provider of fluoride. Recommendations for total dietary fluoride intake should be calculated based upon body weight using the formula of 0.05 mg/kg/day.25 An analysis of fluoride exposures and ingestion from multiple sources may be responsible for higher than optimal amounts of fluoride required for caries prevention.26,27 Even children in nonfluoridated areas benefit from foods and beverages processed in fluoridated areas.28 Sources of fluoride exposure and ingestion for children from dietary and nondietary sources include toothpastes,4,26,29-32 carbonated soft drinks,22 infant formula,4,33,34 prescribed supplements,26,28,35,36 and fluoride mouthrinses and gels. Recent recommendations concerning use of reconstituted infant formula and a fluoridated dentifrice point to the recommendation that parents monitor their use.4 Heilman and coworkers22 examined the fluoride content 2 Continuing Education Management of Fluorosis Using Macro- and Microabrasion of 332 carbonated beverages in Iowa. Their Table 1. Criteria for Dean’s Fluorosis Index results revealed that fluoride levels ranged SCORE CRITERIA from 0.02 to 1.28 parts per million (ppm) with a mean level of 0.72 ppm. Fluoride levels Normal The enamel represents the usual translucent semivitriform exceeded 0.60 ppm for 71% of the products. type of structure. The surface is smooth, glossy, and usually Further, from this study no generalization of a pale creamy white color. could be made about same company/same product results. Different sites of bottling Questionable The enamel discloses slight aberrations from the translucency of normal enamel, ranging from a few white production revealed different fluoride levels. flecks to occasional white spots. This classification is Variation in fluoride content reflects the fact utilized in those instances where a definite diagnosis of the that bottling of beverages utilizes the local mildest form of fluorosis is not warranted and a water supply. classification of “normal" is not justified. It is difficult to monitor fluoride ingestion levels for children. When one considers that Very Mild Small, opaque, paper-white areas scattered irregularly over the tooth but not involving as much as 25% of the tooth fluoride uptake can occur from the water surface. Frequently included in this classification are teeth supply, prescribed fluoride supplements, showing no more than about one to 2 mm of white opacity infant formula, dentifrices, fluoride mouthat the tip of the summit of the cusps of the bicuspids rinses, soft drinks, and reconstituted juices, or second molars. among other sources, it is not surprising that the incidence of fluorosis in the United Mild The white opaque areas in the enamel of the teeth are more extensive but do not involve as much as 50% States has been increasing.34,37-41 of the tooth. Further, with the increase in new immigrants to the United States, fluorosis Moderate All enamel surfaces of the teeth are affected, and the can be observed due to endemic fluorosis surfaces subject to attrition show wear. Brown stain is in other countries.42-50 For example, an frequently a disfiguring feature. unusual source of fluoride (not from foods Severe Includes teeth formerly classified as “moderately severe or beverages) has been reported in Kenya and severe.” All enamel surfaces are affected and and affects other east African nations as hypoplasia is so marked that the general form of the tooth well. A 1986 epidemiological study of may be affected. The major diagnostic sign of this dental fluorosis in Kenya stated that in fact classification is discrete or confluent pitting. Brown stains “dental fluorosis has been endemic to are widespread and teeth often present a Eastern Africa and in particular Kenya for corroded-like appearance. many years since the Great Rift Valley, Source: Dean HT, 1942. Health Effects of Ingested Fluoride. Washington, DC: National which is known to have volcanic activity, Academy of Sciences; 1993:169. passes through Kenya.” Although it is believed that the main source of fluoride is from the drinking MINIMALLY INVASIVE AESTHETIC TREATMENT water (in some rural parts of Kenya there are 2 ppm fluoride OPTIONS FOR MILD TO MODERATE DENTAL in the drinking water with the corresponding incidence of FLUOROSIS fluorosis being 100%), the volcanic soil of Kenya has been Concerns about the aesthetic appearance of teeth with fluorosis found to also have very high concentrations of fluoride. Durhave led to proposed new guidelines for fluoridation of drinking ing the dry season in Kenya, the dust contains fluoride water.52 The goal of fluoride supplements is to provide an 51 concentrations between 2,800 ppm and 5,600 ppm. optimal amount of fluoride to reduce the risk of dental caries. 3 Continuing Education Management of Fluorosis Using Macro- and Microabrasion Recent recommendations reflect Table 2. Dental Fluorosis in the United States 1999 to 2002, Based changes from the previous levels Upon Characteristics—CDC Data (from cdc.gov.mmwr/PDF/ss/ss5403.pdf) of fluoride to a more optimal Age Group Unaffected Questionable Very Mild Mild Moderate/Severe level of fluoride of 0.7 mg/L.52 These changes reflect the fact 6 to 11 59.8% 11.8% 19.8% 5.8% 2.7% that the ingestion of fluoride can come from multiple 12 to 15 51.5% 12.0% 25.3% 7.7% 3.6% sources, resulting in a need for 16 to 19 58.3% 10.2% 20.8% 6.7% 4.0% a lower level of fluoride in optimally fluoridated drinking 20 to 39 74.9% 8.8% 11.1% 3.3% 1.8% water. The recommendations also take into account that fluoride supplements need only speckled mottling of enamel reveals a more yellow enamel be considered for patients at moderate to high risk for color beneath the surface. For some patients, the loss of the dental caries and even then may be unnecessary if patients white speckled enamel to yellow is not acceptable. For these cases, a combined microabrasion/macroabrasion are receiving adequate fluoride from other sources. with vital bleaching is an aesthetically acceptable The majority of patients with fluorosis have mild and very treatment.59,60 mild conditions. Depending on the severity of fluorosis and its clinical appearance, restorative treatments can change the aesthetic appearance of teeth. Decisions for changes should CASE REPORT be based upon the patient’s perception regarding whether A 20-year-old female patient was screened at the dental there is a need for treatment. Fluorosis staining is within the clinic for routine dental care. Her chief complaint was to enamel. In cases of mild fluorosis, the enamel discoloration is remove and/or minimize the noticeable brown/yellow superficial. For moderate and severe fluorosis, the enamel staining of her teeth. She wanted the least invasive and staining and mottling can penetrate to deeper Table 3. Changes in Flouride Supplement enamel levels. For cases of mild fluorosis of Dosage Schedule, 1979 and 1994 1,15,16 aesthetic concern to the patient, vital bleaching can be successful in achieving a 1979 Concentration of Fluoride Ion in Drinking Water (ppm) change that the patient desires.53 When the Age < 0.3 0.3 to 0.7 > 0.7 patient presents with mild-moderate flourosis, 2 weeks to 2 years 0.25 mg/day none none there may be the need for a microabrasion or macroabrasion technique. 2 to 3 years 0.50 mg/day 0.25 mg/day none Microabrasion refers to the use of a 3 to 16 years 1.00 mg/day 0.50 mg/day none hydrochloric acid abrasive paste to remove the superficial enamel staining.54-57 In those cases where the fluorosis may be 1994 Concentration of Fluoride Ion in Drinking Water (ppm) deeper in the superficial enamel but still Age < 0.3 0.3 to 0.6 > 0.6 mild in discoloration, a combined use of a fine abrasive diamond (50- to 75-µm grit Birth to 6 months none none none size) in a high-speed handpiece with water 6 months to 3 years 0.25 mg/day none none spray provides for a more rapid removal of the discolored enamel and has been 3 to 6 years 0.50 mg/day 0.25 mg/day none 58 referred to as macroabrasion. When the 6 to 16 years 1.00 mg/day 0.50 mg/day none superficial enamel is removed, the white 4 Continuing Education Management of Fluorosis Using Macro- and Microabrasion most cost effective treatment to change her smile. A review of her medical history and past dental history revealed no contraindications to dental treatment. In consideration of her age, the patient was not interested in treatment options that involved significant removal of tooth structure, such as porcelain or composite resin veneers which had previously been suggested to her from her previous dentist. The patient’s desire to change the appearance of her teeth in the aesthetic zone was to improve her smile and thereby her confidence. From the appearance of her teeth, a diagnosis of mild to moderate fluorosis staining (determined by using Dean’s Fluorosis Index) was present on the anterior and posterior teeth in the aesthetic zone (white mottled enamel hypomineralization), with the most significant staining occurring on the maxillary anterior teeth; teeth Nos. 8 and 9 contained dark brown streaks in the middle third of the facial surfaces (Figure 4). A review of her past history and a complete dental examination revealed her country of origin as Kenya. She reported childhood friends as having the same discoloration of their teeth. As previously noted, Kenya is associated with endemic fluorosis. A treatment plan was presented to the patient that would fulfill her request for minimally invasive treatment which proposed macroabrasion/microabrasion of the superficial enamel staining. Upon completion of treatment, the tooth shade would be evaluated. If the patient desired further whitening, it was decided that at-home bleaching treatment would be provided. Figure 4. Preoperative view of moderate fluorosis with patient desiring a color change and treatment. Figure 5. Dental dam applied. Figure 6. Macroabrasion of the facial surfaces of the teeth using a 50-µm grit fine diamond with a highspeed handpiece with airwater spray. Figure 7. Application of Opalustre microabrasion paste (Ultradent Products). Phase 1: Enamel Abrasion Phase After receiving a routine oral prophylaxis, the maxillary teeth in the aesthetic zone (Nos. 4 to 13) were isolated with a dental dam to protect the gingival tissues when the acidic microabrasion paste was to be used (Figure 5). A combined enamel macroabrasion/microabrasion technique was decided to be the most effective way to treat the hypomineralized defects of the maxillary first premolars, canines, lateral and central incisors. Enamel macroabrasion refers to the use of either medium or fine grit diamond abrasives or multifluted finishing burs with a high-speed handpiece with air-water spray to remove the superficial layer of the enamel.58,60 Enamel microabrasion refers to the use Figure 8. Rubbing the microabrasion paste into the enamel surfaces of the maxillary incisors with specialized brush embedded in cup at a speed of 1,000 rpm. of a low concentration acid combined with an abrasive agent as a water soluble gel or paste that would be applied to the enamel surface with an extremely low-speed rotary 5 Continuing Education Management of Fluorosis Using Macro- and Microabrasion handpiece pressure applicator for precise compression of the compound on the tooth surface so that splattering of the compound would be eliminated or minimized. For this case, speed reduction was accomplished with an electric handpiece (Bien-Air Dental). Specialized torque converter speed reduction adapters can also be used. Use of the ultra-low-speed rotary application makes the procedure safer, easier, and quicker.60,61 The current formulation for microabrasion pastes is a low concentration hydrochloric acid (6.6%), silicon carbide abrasive, and silica gel as a binding agent. This paste in fact etches the enamel surface more aggressively than the use of phosphoric acid used for adhesive restorative dentistry.61 To accomplish macroabrasion/microabrasion, the facial surfaces of the treated teeth were lightly abraded with a flame-shaped fine grit (50 µm) diamond (8862F [Brasseler USA]) using a high-speed handpiece with air-water spray (Figure 6) to remove the superficial enamel dysmineralization layer to a depth of approximately 0.2 to 0.3 mm. After completion of the rotary macroabrasion, the microabrasion paste (Opalustre [Ultradent Products]) was applied to the facial surfaces of the treated maxillary teeth (Figure 7). Using a right angle latch type slow-speed handpiece running the motor at 1,000 rpm, a hybrid bristle brush-cup was used to apply the microabrasion paste for 3 separate applications of 30 to 40 seconds each (Figure 8). Between each application the microabrasion paste was rinsed and dried from the tooth surfaces (Figure 9). This procedure was repeated 3 times (Figure 10). At the completion of the macroabrasion/microabrasion technique the etched enamel surfaces were polished with a cupshaped porcelain polishing rubber abrasive (Jazz [SS White Burs]) to smooth and polish the enamel surface (Figure 11). To remineralize the acid attached enamel surface the teeth were treated with a topical sodium fluoride (NuPro [DENTSPLY International]) in a fluoride tray. Then an amorphous calcium phosphate paste (MI Paste Plus [GC America]) was rubbed onto the enamel surfaces with a gloved finger. The dental dam was removed and the patient viewed the result of treatment. She was pleased with the result from the immediate removal of the dark staining on her maxillary anterior teeth (Figure 12). The patient was informed that Figure 9. Appearance of teeth after the first application. Figure 10. Appearance of teeth after third application. Figure 11. Polishing the etched enamel surfaces with a porcelain polishing rubber abrasive (Jazz [SS White Burs]). Figure 12. Postoperative view of macroabrasion/microabrasion treatment. Figure 13. Postoperative view after 4 weeks of tray bleaching. because of the dental dam isolation and the etching process of the microabrasion paste, evaluation of the final color and appearance of the teeth was to be done one week after 6 Continuing Education Management of Fluorosis Using Macro- and Microabrasion treatment. In case there would be the need for postoperative tooth bleaching, maxillary and mandibular impressions were made for subsequent bleaching tray fabrication if indicated. The patient did not return until 3 weeks after treatment because of travel plans. appearance was evaluated and determined to be a shade B1 (Figure 13). The patient was pleased with the final aesthetic result. CONCLUSION Tooth discoloration due to fluorosis is an aesthetic problem for certain patients. While there is a range of restorative interventions that can be used to change the appearance of fluorosed teeth, the goal of minimally invasive treatment for mild-moderate fluorosis is the one that should be evaluated first. For the case presented in this article, a minimally invasive treatment option of macroabrasion/microabrasion followed by tooth whitening with bleaching trays was shown to be a satisfactory approach for the aesthetic treatment of moderate fluorosis. In the United States, new recommendations for reducing the optimal level of fluoride for water fluoridation are addressing aesthetic concerns without putting teeth at risk for caries. The current evidence demonstrates that when a diagnosis of fluorosis has been made, the majority of cases are very mild or mild and do not pose aesthetic problems that require treatment unless it is of concern to the patient. For the primary author, in cases where fluorosis is evident for a child, it is typically the parent who has identified the discoloration and has questions about the appearance of the teeth. For some mild fluorosis discoloration and for moderate/severe fluorosis elective treatment to change the aesthetic appearance of the teeth can many times be accomplished with minimally invasive treatment using vital bleaching or combinations of macroabrasion/microabrasion with bleaching to provide the patient with an aesthetically acceptable result. For more severe fluorosis with dark discolorations and surface pitting, adhesive restorative dentistry may be necessary to fulfill a patient’s aesthetic desires. Phase 2: Tray Bleaching The second phase of the treatment was initiated approximately 3 weeks later (the patient traveled back to Kenya in the interim). Using a Classical Vita Shade Guide (Vident) it was determined that the teeth treated were now predominantly an A2 shade. When removing the superficial brownish-white enamel dysmineralization hypomineralization, it is not unusual for the final shade of the teeth to be slightly yellower than the original appearance (whitish speckled discoloration due to fluorosis of the teeth). This was observed with this patient.The patient elected to whiten her teeth further using vital tray bleaching. Fabricated bleaching trays were delivered to the patient along with a 15% carbamide peroxide with potassium nitrate and fluoride bleaching gel (Opalescence 15%PF [Ultradent Products]) to be used with overnight application each night for 4 weeks. The patient was told that if she was unable to bleach overnight to use the bleaching trays for at least 2 hours each day. During bleaching, the patient reported mild sensitivity to the initial bleaching application. She treated the tooth sensitivity using a recommendation of placing a desensitizing toothpaste (Sensodyne [GlaxoSmithKline]) in the bleaching tray one hour prior to bleaching,62 then cleaning the tray of the toothpaste and continuing with the bleaching regimen. One week of using the desensitizing toothpaste was all that was necessary to control the sensitivity. The patient reported being able to follow the overnight regimen of bleaching. After 4 weeks, the tooth shade and 7 Continuing Education Management of Fluorosis Using Macro- and Microabrasion 17. Berg J, Gerweck C, Hujoel PP, et al. Evidence-based clinical recommendations regarding fluoride intake from reconstituted infant formula and enamel fluorosis: a report of the American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs. J Am Dent Assoc. 2011;142:79-87. REFERENCES 1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Achievements in public health, 1900-1999: fluoridation of drinking water to prevent dental caries. JAMA. 2000;283:1283-1286. 2. Ismail AI, Hasson H. Fluoride supplements, dental caries and fluorosis: a systematic review. J Am Dent Assoc. 2008;139:1457-1468. 3. 4. 18. Steinmetz JE, Martinez-Mier EA, Jones JE, et al. Fluoride content of water used to reconstitute infant formula. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2011;50:100-105. Aoba T, Fejerskov O. Dental fluorosis: chemistry and biology. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 2002;13:155-170. 19. American Dental Association. Accepted Dental Therapeutics. 33rd-40th eds. Chicago, IL: Council on Dental Therapeutics of the American Dental Association; 1969/1970-1984:399402. Levy SM, Broffitt B, Marshall TA, et al. Associations between fluorosis of permanent incisors and fluoride intake from infant formula, other dietary sources and dentifrice during early childhood. J Am Dent Assoc. 2010;141:1190-1201. 5. Martins CC, Feitosa NB, Vale MP, et al. Parents’ perceptions of oral health conditions depicted in photographs of anterior permanent teeth. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2010;11:203-209. 6. Wright JT, Chen SC, Hall KI, et al. Protein characterization of fluorosed human enamel. J Dent Res. 1996;75:1936-1941. 7. Limeback H. Enamel formation and the effects of fluoride. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1994;22:144-147. 8. Beltrán-Aguilar ED, Barker L, Dye BA. Prevalence and severity of dental fluorosis in the United States, 1999-2004. NCHS Data Brief. 2010;(53):1-8. 9. Cutress TW, Suckling GW. Differential diagnosis of dental fluorosis. J Dent Res. 1990;69(special issue):714-721. 20. Marya CM, Dhingra S, Marya V, et al. Relationship of dental caries at different concentrations of fluoride in endemic areas: an epidemiological study. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2010;35:41-45. 21. Thippeswamy HM, Kumar N, Anand SR, et al. Fluoride content in bottled drinking waters, carbonated soft drinks and fruit juices in Davangere city, India. Indian J Dent Res. 2010;21:528-530. 22. Heilman JR, Kiritsy MC, Levy SM, et al. Assessing fluoride levels of carbonated soft drinks. J Am Dent Assoc. 1999;130:1593-1599. 23. Levy SM, Guha-Chowdhury N. Total fluoride intake and implications for dietary fluoride supplementation. J Public Health Dent. 1999;59:211-223. 10. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Recommendations for using fluoride to prevent and control dental caries in the United States. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2001;50(RR-14):1-42. 24. Levy SM, Kiritsy MC, Warren JJ. Sources of fluoride intake in children. J Public Health Dent. 1995;55:39-52. 25. Institute of Medicine. Fluoride. In: Dietary Reference Intakes for Calcium, Phosphorus, Magnesium, Vitamin D, and Fluoride. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1997:288-313. 11. Oral Health in America: A Report of the Surgeon General. Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2000. surgeongeneral.gov/library/oralhealth. Accessed June 20, 2011. 26. Levy SM. Review of fluoride exposures and ingestion. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1994;22:173-180. 12. Clark DC. Trends in prevalence of dental fluorosis in North America. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1994;22:148-152. 27. Rodrigues MH, Leite AL, Arana A, et al. Dietary fluoride intake by children receiving different sources of systemic fluoride. J Dent Res. 2009;88:142-145. 13. Rozier RG. The prevalence and severity of enamel fluorosis in North American children. J Public Health Dent. 1999;59:239-246. 28. Levy SM, Warren JJ, Davis CS, et al. Patterns of fluoride intake from birth to 36 months. J Public Health Dent. 2001;61:70-77. 14. Beltrán-Aguilar ED, Barker LK, Canto MT, et al; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Surveillence for dental caries, dental sealants, tooth retention, edentulism, and enamel fluorosis—United States, 1988-1994 and 1999-2002. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2005;54:1-43. cdc.gov.mmwr/PDF/ss/ ss5403.pdf. Accessed June 20, 2011. 29. Franzman MR, Levy SM, Warren JJ, et al. Fluoride dentifrice ingestion and fluorosis of the permanent incisors. J Am Dent Assoc. 2006;137:645-652. 30. Moraes SM, Pessan JP, Ramires I, et al. Fluoride intake from regular and low fluoride dentifrices by 2-3-year-old children: influence of the dentifrice flavor. Braz Oral Res. 2007;21:234-240. 15. Dosage schedule for dietary fluoride supplements. Proceedings of a workshop. Chicago, Ill. January 31 to February 1, 1994. J Public Health Dent. 1999;59:203-281. 31. de Almeida BS, da Silva Cardoso VE, Buzalaf MA. Fluoride ingestion from toothpaste and diet in 1- to 3-year-old Brazilian children. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2007;35:53-63. 16. American Academy of Pediatrics. Committee on Nutrition. Fluoride supplementation: revised dosage schedule. Pediatrics. 1979;63:150-152. 8 Continuing Education Management of Fluorosis Using Macro- and Microabrasion 48. Ermi RB, Koray F, Akdeniz BG. Dental caries and fluorosis in low- and high-fluoride areas in Turkey. Quintessence Int. 2003;34:354-360. 32. Oliveira MJ, Paiva SM, Martins LH, et al. Fluoride intake by children at risk for the development of dental fluorosis: comparison of regular dentifrices and flavoured dentifrices for children. Caries Res. 2007;41:460-466. 33. Walton JL, Messer LB. Dental caries and fluorosis in breastfed and bottle-fed children. Caries Res. 1981;15:124-137. 49. Ibrahim YE, Bjorvatn K, Birkeland JM. Caries and dental fluorosis in a 0.25 and a 2.5 ppm fluoride area in the Sudan. Int J Paediatr Dent. 1997;7:161-166. 34. Pendrys DG, Katz RV, Morse DE. Risk factors for enamel fluorosis in a fluoridated population. Am J Epidemiol. 1994;140:461-471. 50. Ferreira EF, Vargas AM, Castilho LS, et al. Factors associated to endemic fluorosis in Brazilian rural communities. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2010;7:3115-3128. 35. Marthaler RM. Fluoride supplements for systemic effects in caries prevention. In: Johansen E, Taves DR, Olsen TO, eds. Continuing Evaluation of the Use of Fluorides. Boulder, CO: Westview Press; 1979:33-59. 51. Manji F, Baelum V, Fejerskov O. Dental fluorosis in an area of Kenya with 2 ppm fluoride in the drinking water. J Dent Res. 1986;65:659-662. 52. HHS and EPA announce new scientific assessments and actions on fluoride [news release]. US Department of Health & Human Services; January 7, 2011. hhs.gov/news/press/ 2011pres/01/20110107a.html. Accessed June 20, 2011. 36. Levy SM, Kiritsy MC, Slager SL, et al. Patterns of dietary fluoride supplement use during infancy. J Public Health Dent. 1998;58:228-233. 53. Loyola-Rodriguez JP, Pozos-Guillen Ade J, HernandezHernandez F, et al. Effectiveness of treatment with carbamide peroxide and hydrogen peroxide in subjects affected by dental fluorosis: a clinical trial. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2003;28:63-67. 37. Levy SM, Hillis SL, Warren JJ, et al. Primary tooth fluorosis and fluoride intake during the first year of life. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2002; 30:286-295. 38. Osuji OO, Leake JL, Chipman ML, et al. Risk factors for dental fluorosis in a fluoridated community. J Dent Res. 1988;67:1488-1492. 54. Croll TP, Cavanaugh RR. Enamel color modification by controlled hydrochloric acid-pumice abrasion. I. Technique and examples. Quintessence Int. 1986;17:81-87. 39. Ismail AI, Messer JG. The risk of fluorosis in students exposed to a higher than optimal concentration of fluoride in well water. J Public Health Dent. 1996;56:22-27. 55. Croll TP, Cavanaugh RR. Enamel color modification by controlled hydrochloric acid-pumice abrasion. II. Further examples. Quintessence Int. 1986;17:157-164. 40. Holm AK, Andersson R. Enamel mineralization disturbances in 12- year-old children with known early exposure to fluorides. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1982;10:335-339. 56. Allen K, Agosta C, Estafan D. Using microabrasive material to remove fluorosis stains. J Am Dent Assoc. 2004;135:319-323. 41. Kumar JV, Green EL, Wallace W, et al. Trends in dental fluorosis and dental caries prevalences in Newburgh and Kingston, NY. Am J Public Health. 1989;79:565-569. 57. Croll TP. Enamel microabrasion for removal of superficial discoloration. J Esthet Dent. 1989;1:14-20. 42. Nirgude AS, Saiprasad GS, Naik PR, et al. An epidemiological study on fluorosis in an urban slum area of Nalgonda, Andhra Pradesh, India. Indian J Public Health. 2010;54:194-196. 58. Coll JA, Jackson P, Strassler HE. Comparison of enamel microabrasion techniques: Prema Compound versus a 12fluted finishing bur. J Esthet Dent. 1991;3:180-186. 43. Gopalakrishnan P, Vasan RS, Sarma PS, et al. Prevalence of dental fluorosis and associated risk factors in Alappuzha district, Kerala. Natl Med J India. 1999;12:99-103. 59. Higashi C, Dall’Agnol AL, Hirata R, et al. Association of enamel microabrasion and bleaching: a case report. Gen Dent. 2008;56:244-249. 44. Kadir RA, Al-Maqtari RA. Endemic fluorosis among 14-yearold Yemeni adolescents: an exploratory survey. Int Dent J. 2010;60:407-410. 60. Strassler HE. Clinical case report: treatment of mild-tomoderate fluorosis with a minimally invasive treatment plan. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2010; 31:54-58. 45. Marya CM, Dhingra S, Marya V, et al. Relationship of dental caries at different concentrations of fluoride in endemic areas: an epidemiological study. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2010;35:41-45. 61. Croll TP. Enamel microabrasion: concept development. In: Croll TP. Enamel Microabrasion. Chicago, IL: Quintessence Publishing; 1991:37-41. 62. Haywood VB, Cordero R, Wright K, et al. Brushing with a potassium nitrate dentifrice to reduce bleaching sensitivity. J Clin Dent. 2005;16:17-22. 46. Mwaniki DL, Courtney JM, Gaylor JD. Endemic fluorosis: an analysis of needs and possibilities based on case studies in Kenya. Soc Sci Med. 1994;39:807-813. 47. Faye M, Diawara CK, Ndiaye KR, et al. Dental fluorosis and dental caries prevalence in Senegalese children living in a high-fluoride area and consuming a poor fluoridated drinking water [in French]. Dakar Med. 2008;53:162-169. 9 Continuing Education Management of Fluorosis Using Macro- and Microabrasion 2. Water fluoridation has been described as being a significant public health measure. Through the use of fluoridation there has been a significant decline in what oral pathology? POST EXAMINATION INFORMATION To receive continuing education credit for participation in this educational activity you must complete the program post examination and receive a score of 70% or better. a. b. c. d. Traditional Completion Option: You may fax or mail your answers with payment to Dentistry Today (see Traditional Completion Information on following page). All information requested must be provided in order to process the program for credit. Be sure to complete your “Payment,” “Personal Certification Information,” “Answers,” and “Evaluation” forms. Your exam will be graded within 72 hours of receipt. Upon successful completion of the postexam (70% or higher), a letter of completion will be mailed to the address provided. 3. Dental fluorosis is defined as: a. b. c. d. Online Completion Option: Use this page to review the questions and mark your answers. Return to dentalcetoday.com and sign in. If you have not previously purchased the program, select it from the “Online Courses” listing and complete the online purchase process. Once purchased the program will be added to your User History page where a Take Exam link will be provided directly across from the program title. Select the Take Exam link, complete all the program questions and Submit your answers. An immediate grade report will be provided. Upon receiving a passing grade, complete the online evaluation form. Upon submitting the form your Letter Of Completion will be provided immediately for printing. Hypomineralization of enamel resulting from excessive ingestion of fluoride during tooth development. Hypermineralization of enamel resulting from excessive ingestion of fluoride during tooth development. Hypomineralization of dentin resulting from excessive ingestion of fluoride during tooth development. Hypermineralization of dentin resulting from excessive ingestion of fluoride during tooth development. 4. According to the article, the degree to which enamel is affected by fluoride causing fluorosis is dependent on the all the following EXCEPT: a. b. c. d. Duration of exposure to fluoride. Timing of when fluoride is administered. Intensity of fluoride concentration. The patients’ gender. 5. The clinical appearance of mild fluorosis is: a. b. c. d. General Program Information: Online users may log in to dentalcetoday.com any time in the future to access previously purchased programs and view or print letters of completion and results. Dark yellowing of the enamel. Dark brown and black stains oriented with horizontal streaks within the enamel. Small white streaks with enamel mottling. Bluish translucency to the enamel. 6. The clinical appearance of moderate fluorosis is: a. b. c. d. POST EXAMINATION QUESTIONS 1. During tooth development fluoride becomes incorporated into which portion of the tooth making it more resistant to acid attack by bacteria? a. b. c. d. Periodontal disease. Tooth crowding and misalignment. Tooth anomalies. Caries. Dark yellowing of the enamel. Small translucent-bluish streaks on the enamel surface. White streaking with brownish staining of the enamel. Dark black streaks with white halos surrounding them within the enamel surface. 7. The clinical appearance of severe fluorosis is: a. b. Periodontal ligament. Enamel. Dentin. Pulp. c. d. 10 Dark yellowing of the enamel. Very dark brown staining with some cases having enamel defects. Slight white streaking of the enamel. Bluish translucency to the enamel. Continuing Education Management of Fluorosis Using Macro- and Microabrasion c. 8. The majority of patients with enamel fluorosis have mild or very mild conditions. All conditions of mild and very mild enamel fluorosis require an aesthetic restorative intervention. a. b. c. d. d. Both statements are true. The first statement is true and the second statement is false. The first statement is false and the second statement is true. Both statements are false. 13. Because fluoride is ingested from multiple sources, there have been recent recommendations to lower the amount of fluoride in optimally fluoridated drinking water. These proposed changes are to lower the optimal level of fluoride to: a. b. c. d. 9. In cases where the patient is concerned about the aesthetic appearance of mild-moderate fluorosis, conservative, minimally invasive treatment technique(s) that can be used is (are): a. b. c. d. a. b. c. d. a. Both statements are true. The first statement is true and the second statement is false. The first statement is false and the second statement is true. Both statements are false. b. c. d. b. A 50-µm aluminum oxide particle in an air abrasion device to remove fluorosis discoloration. Abrasive pumice paste with phosphoric acid with a prophylaxis brush to remove fluorosis discoloration. Fine abrasive diamond (50- to 75-µm grit size) in a high-speed handpiece with water spray. A 10% sodium peroxide gel to whiten the enamel surfaces. 16. When treating fluorosis discoloration that has a white speckled mottling of enamel, it is not uncommon that once the superficial enamel discoloration has been removed, the enamel has a more yellow appearance. In these cases a conservative treatment to achieve an acceptable aesthetic result as described in the article is: Toothpaste. Carbonated soft drinks. Infant formula. All the above are sources for fluoride exposure and ingestion for children. a. b. 12. When evaluating children for ingestion of fluoride it is not uncommon for the dental professional to not include carbonated beverages as a potential source of fluoride. From the study by Heilman and coworkers their conclusion was that: a. Hydrochloric acid abrasive paste to remove superficial enamel staining. Hydrofluoric acid abrasive powders in a air abrasion device to remove superficial enamel staining. Mild fluoride rinse (1.1% sodium fluoride) to treat mottled enamel and dentin. Phosphoric acid gel to remove brown and black stains in the superficial enamel and root surfaces. 15. Macroabrasion refers to an aesthetic treatment technique that uses: 11. Source(s) for fluoride exposure and ingestion for children from dietary and nondietary as reported in the dental literature include: a. b. c. d. 0.005 mg/L. 0.7 mg/L. 1.1 mg/L. 7.0 mg/L. 14. Microabrasion as an aesthetic treatment technique refers to the use of an: Vital bleaching. Macroabrasion-microabrasion. Macroabrasion-microabrasion followed by vital bleaching. All are conservative, minimally invasive treatment techniques for mild-moderate fluorosis. 10. Microabrasion refers to the use of a hydrochloric acid abrasive paste to remove the superficial enamel staining. In those cases where the fluorosis may be deeper in the superficial enamel but still mild in discoloration, a combined use of a fine abrasive diamond (50- to 75-µm grit size) in a high-speed handpiece with water spray provides for a more rapid removal of the discolored enamel and has been referred to as macroabrasion. a. b. c. d. Variation in fluoride content reflects the fact that bottling of beverages utilizes the local water supply. b and c. c. d. Carbonated beverages are not a source for fluoride ingestion. Different sites of bottling production for carbonated beverages can reveal different fluoride levels. 11 Full-coverage all-ceramic crowns. Combined microabrasion/macroabrasion with vital bleaching. No treatment is necessary, the patient will have to live with the yellow enamel shade. Three quarter crown preparations then restored with zirconia veneers. Continuing Education Management of Fluorosis Using Macro- and Microabrasion PROGRAM COMPLETION INFORMATION PERSONAL CERTIFICATION INFORMATION: If you wish to purchase and complete this activity traditionally (mail or fax) rather than online, you must provide the information requested below. Please be sure to select your answers carefully and complete the evaluation information. To receive credit you must answer at least 12 of the 16 questions correctly. Last Name (PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY OR TYPE) First Name Profession / Credentials Street Address Complete online at: dentalcetoday.com Suite or Apartment Number TRADITIONAL COMPLETION INFORMATION: Mail or fax this completed form with payment to: City Dentistry Today E-mail Address PAYMENT & CREDIT INFORMATION: ANSWER FORM: COURSE #: 142 Examination Fee: $40.00 Credit Hours: 2.0 Please check the correct box for each question below. Note: There is a $10 surcharge to process a check drawn on any bank other than a US bank. Should you have additional questions, please contact us at (973) 882-4700. I have enclosed a check or money order. I am using a credit card. My Credit Card information is provided below. American Express Visa MC Discover (please print clearly): 1. a b c d 9. a b c d 2. a b c d 10. a b c d 3. a b c d 11. a b c d 4. a b c d 12. a b c d 5. a b c d 13. a b c d 6. a b c d 14. a b c d 7. a b c d 15. a b c d 8. a b c d 16. a b c d PROGRAM EVAUATION FORM Exact Name on Credit Card Please complete the following activity evaluation questions. / Rating Scale: Excellent = 5 and Poor = 0 Expiration Date Course objectives were achieved. Content was useful and benefited your clinical practice. Review questions were clear and relevant to the editorial. Illustrations and photographs were clear and relevant. Written presentation was informative and concise. How much time did you spend reading the activity and completing the test? Signature Approved PACE Program Provider FAGD/MAGD Credit Approval does not imply acceptance by a state or provincial board of dentistry or AGD endorsement. June 1, 2009 to May 31, 2012 AGD Pace approval number: 309062 Zip Code Fax Number With Area Code Fax: 973-882-3622 Credit Card # State Daytime Telephone Number With Area Code Department of Continuing Education 100 Passaic Avenue Fairfield, NJ 07004 Please provide the following License Number Dentistry Today, Inc, is an ADA CERP Recognized Provider. ADA CERP is a service of the American Dental Association to assist dental professionals in indentifying quality providers of continuing dental education. ADA CERP does not approve or endorse individual courses or instructors, nor does it imply acceptance of credit hours by boards of dentistry. Concerns or complaints about a CE provider may be directed to the provider or to ADA CERP at ada.org/goto/cerp. 12
© Copyright 2024