Executive function and risky sexual behavior in individuals with traumatic brain injury Jhon Alexander Moreno, M.Sc. & Michelle McKerral, Ph.D. Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal (CRIR) ─ Centre de réadaptation Lucie-Bruneau Department of Psychology, Université de Montréal Montréal (Québec) Canada e-mail: [email protected] Table 1. Total sample (N=89) INTRODUCTION Executive functions encompass a variety of higher-order abilities such as judgment, planning, decision-making, response monitoring, insight, and self-regulation. After a traumatic brain injury (TBI), 45% of individuals with TBI can present difficulties in executive functioning that can persist as long as 10 years post-injury. Healthy controls Variable Mean (SD) Mean (SD) 37.6 (10.7) 37.9 (9.7) Education (Years) 13.0 (3.0) 12.8 (3.3) Annual income (CAD) 31975.6 (18909.9) 39007.5 (19239.6) Glasgow Coma Scale - 12.5 (3.6) Years post- injury - 3.3 (4.3) Note: There were no significant differences between the groups in all of the sociodemographic variables. Cause of the injury OBJECTIVES Violence 5% METHODS Sportsrelated 14% Loss of consciousness Healthy controls (N = 47) Injury severity Mild TBI 67% Unknown 7% Men 51% Moderate TBI 7% No 43% Yes 50% Women 49% Unknown 7% Severe TBI 19% Measures Work status Not working 45% 1. Dysexecutive questionnaire (DEX). 2. The Sexual Risk Survey (SRS). Work status Full-time 38% Missing 2% Not working 45% Full-time 55% Design Correlational, exploratory, cross-sectional study. Procedure Part-time 17% Participants were mailed two separate envelopes: Part-time 15% Relationship status 1. A consent form. 2. A package containing the questionnaires. Relationship status Single 45% Single 62% Married 11% Each of the envelopes contained a prepaid envelope so that the participant could return each document independently. Widow 2% Married 9% Commonlaw 24% Divorced 5% Divorced 4% Separated 8% Commonlaw 30% 3 20 2 1 0 0 TBI Healthy controls TBI Individuals with TBI reported significantly more dysexecutive problems, but both groups showed similar levels of risky sexual behavior. There was a moderate positive correlation between risky sexual behavior and executive function (r = .36, p < .05), with more frequent and severe dysexecutive problems associated with higher levels of risky sexual behavior. See also Table 2. Risky sexual behavior was associated with number of hours of loss of consciousness (r = .48, p < .05), but not with injury severity (GCS score) or time since injury (p’s > .05). 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Falls 10% Work accident 14% p > .05 Table 2. Correlation matrix Other 7% To explore the relationship between risky sexual behavior and executive function in individuals with TBI. Women 55% p < .01 Vehicle accident 43% Missing 7% Sexual Risk Survey 4 30 Healthy controls Thus, the relationship between risky sexual behavior and executive function needs to be studied in individuals with TBI. Men 45% TBI 5 10 Executive functions are important to put in practice healthy behaviors. Judging a situation as risky or safe can be challenging for some individuals with TBI, and they may be involved in risky behaviors (e.g., smoking, risky driving, drug/alcohol use, among others). TBI (N = 42) DEX Questionnaire 40 Age (Years) Risky sexual behavior can have negative consequences in terms of sexual health. For instance, risky sexual behavior includes poor protective behaviors (e.g., condom use), unintended pregnancies and s e x u a l l y t r a n s m i t t e d d i s e a s e s ( S T D ’s ) , s u c h a s h u m a n immunodeficiency virus infection and acquired immune deficiency syndrome (HIV/AIDS). RESULTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Special thanks to all individuals who accepted to participate in this study. Variable SRT-UP RSA ISA IE-RSB RASA DEXBEH DEXCOG DEXEMO 1 .26 .69** .70** .11 .45** .46** .38* 2 3 .23 .12 .60** .01 -.02 -.12 .73** .01 .38* .32* .29 4 5 6 7 .03 .26 -.17 .37* -.06 .72** .32* -.20 .52** .53** Note: *p < .05; **p < .01. Abbreviations: SRT-UP, sexual risk taking with uncommitted partners; RSA, risky sex acts; ISA, impulsive sexual acts; IERSB, intent to engage in risky sexual behaviors; RASA, risky anal sexual acts; DEXBEH, Behavior subscale of the DEX; DEXCOG, Cognition subscale of the DEX; DEXEMO, Emotion subscale of the DEX. CONCLUSIONS • To our knowledge, this study is the first to examine the relationships between risky sexual behavior and the presence of reported dysexecutive problems post-TBI. • Our findings imply that TBI individuals with dysexecutive problems could present a co-occurrence of risky sexual behavior. • Given the high frequency of executive problems post-TBI and their repercussion in everyday living, the association between executive function and risky sexual behavior suggest that special attention should be given to individuals with TBI showing difficulties in executive functions in terms of evaluation and interventions that could have a favorable impact on the prevention and remediation of risky behaviors in the sexuality domain. • Education about risky sexual behavior needs to be included in rehabilitation, independently of injury severity or time since injury. • Since individuals with TBI with more dysexecutive symptomatology show higher risky sexual behavior, cognitive rehabilitation of executive functions could also help to promote healthy behaviors.
© Copyright 2024