THE ANIE Assessment of Numeracy in Education. Shelley Wojcik March 31, 2015 For one of my school projects in Education 300, I needed to observe a teacher in their own classroom. The first lesson was grade four math. The teacher gave each student a single worksheet, and on it was one math problem. Each student got out their pencil crayons and felts, started cutting and folding the worksheet, and remained fully engaged while working for fifteen minutes on one question. I noticed the teacher taught this math problem in a series of steps and after each step the teacher reminded the students of the rubric for this activity and made sure they knew what was expected of them in order to achieve success. The second step was solving the question. What could possibly be next after giving the correct answer? As it turns out, solving the question was just the beginning. The real solution is understanding the problem. This backwards way of approaching math is called the ANIE. ANIE is an acronym for Assessment of Numeracy in Education and was created in 2005 by Kevin Bird and Kirk Savage, two school administrators from British Columbia. It was their goal for all students to be taught math learning outcomes from grade 1-12 with real world applications, and to help teachers to achieve this goal. Bird and Savage have followed the latest brain-based learning research and BC Performance Standards to design this effective, simple, and relevant tool for teachers and students. Since the ANIE material has been available on line in 2006, it has found homes in classrooms in Canada, the United States, China, South Korea, Israel, and India. Throughout the years it has been revised, and changes and additions were made with the help of pilot groups’ feedback. A primary specific ANIE junior was created and is used extensively and effectively for students with special learning needs. (Sibbald, 2014) Traditionally, math word problems start with a real-life situation. Some students lack reading, vocabulary and comprehension skills of word problems so this added complexity prevents them from being able to focus on the math. The ANIE turns this traditional model upside down by starting with a math question rather than a word problem. Eliminating language barriers allows students a greater understanding of the math itself by enabling them to use their own words to explain their thinking. Students develop their own real life word problems which promotes a deeper level of cognition, engagement and a long term understanding of the material. (Bird and Savage, 2014) The relationship model below, shows the link between literacy and numeracy and can help in understanding how applying language arts to math can strengthen comprehension. The ANIE template includes estimation, calculation, representation, explanation, application to real life, and reflection. It is an assessment for, of, and as learning that allows teachers to effectively plan instruction, to assess student comprehension, and to encourage student reflection, respectively. The step by step strategy and the incorporation of various learning tools in the ANIE, is a unique scaffolding approach to math comprehension and problem solving, and allows students to be actively engaged and make connections to their own lives in order to facilitate learning. (Bird and Savage, 2014) The value of the ANIE is not only in its assessment properties, but as a teaching tool to increase comprehension in all learners. The ANIE is broken down into several steps, assessing a students’ level of understanding with one single math question. 1. The student is asked to estimate the question of the day. For an example, (321 x 4). This helps student’s work on mental math, as the goal is to have the estimated answer within 10 seconds. 2. Students then explain the process of how they estimated with a partner. When required to explain their thinking, students increase their comprehension and retention of the material. A/B partner talk also allows students to become self-aware, develop paraphrasing and listening skills, and become metacognitive learners. (Bird and Savage, 2014) 3. The student solves the algorithm of the question, practising math fluency. 4. Students then draw a picture to represent the question. A clear picture that evidently demonstrates the question, with captions, numbers, or explanations to clarify. 5. Students then explain their picture to an AB partner. 6. Next, they write out a real-life example for the math question. This is a time for students to be creative and original with their comprehension. 7. Then then share their real-life example with an AB partner. 8. Students take the time to discuss and reflect in their learning what was easy or hard, and make goals for next time. As developing educators, we are taught that learning is multidimensional and set within a social context. The ANIE is a practical application that incorporates these cognitive learning theories and many more. It encourages creative thinking and writing, social skills, connecting to real-life, sharing ideas with others, active thinking and reflection. Each time a student completes an ANIE, they strengthen their neural connections between brain cells, and consistency allows these pathways to be more efficient in transmitting messages within the nervous system. (Auger and Rich, 2007) Not only is the ANIE relevant to learning, it is also an effective assessment tool which helps teachers identify their students’ math comprehension while supporting gaps in their learning. It provides an opportunity for teachers to reflect on their teaching to ensure no students fall behind and to identify problems quickly for intervention. The ANIE also helps identify students that can go deeper in understanding a concept and move beyond expectations in math. Gaps in learning are not always apparent from testing correct answers. Many students get the correct answer without an understanding of concept or procedure. The ANIE helps students to represent answers in different ways and to identify multiple solutions and approaches which develops comprehension. (Bird and Savage, 2014) It is common for developing educators to feel reluctant about teaching math. Many teachers are intimidated by the subject, sometimes because of past experiences in school or possibly because of a general insecurity with the material. Many teachers who have mathematics anxiety inadvertently pass it on to their students and this lack of passion and self-confidence for math can negatively influence their students’ mathematics achievements. (Johnson and vanderSandt, 2011) The ANIE can change the way teachers think about math, the way they teach math and in turn how students learn math. Paul Wojcik, a grade 4 teacher at Vedder Elementary, passionate about mathematics, tried the ANIE in conjunction with the math pilot group within the district, connecting the effectiveness of the ANIE program while also teaching the JUMP math program. After the first year, Wojcik noticed a confidence boost in all learners when it came to the applicability of the math they were learning in examples of real-world situations. In his previous four years of administering the Foundation Skills Assessment (FSA), testing showed that on average, ~10% of his class was not yet meeting expectations, ~80% of his class was meeting expectations, and ~10% of his class was exceeding expectations. Since using the ANIE, Wojcik’s last two years of FSA testing have seen no students’ not yet meeting expectations, and approximately 68% exceeding expectations. Looking at these results, it’s evident that students have vastly improved in their comprehension of the applicability of math into real life situations. They are exposed to them daily, are looking for ways to describe math in real life ways, and feel far more confident when introduced to challenging math situations. Wojcik states, “When speaking with the teachers that have my students from the previous year, they’ve noted that for the first time in years, students that are in grade five are ‘totally getting math’. Combined with JUMP math for its fluency, I feel that ANIE should now be considered ‘Best Practice’ for increasing math comprehension at the elementary level.” It seems like most teachers at the elementary level who are teaching students math skills, focus primarily on fluency. They practice addition, subtraction, multiplication and division religiously, try to have them work on their math facts each night, and usually by the end of the year they hope the fluency is built in so they can recall it quickly for next year. This is similar to spelling lists that you learn on Monday morning, practice spelling them all week, and master them for the Friday assessment. Quite often students do very well on the spelling test on Friday, but often the comprehension and usage of the words is ignored. Next year, will they be able to spell it? Will they know what the word means, or how it’s used? It’s the same with working purely on fluency as a math practice. You definitely need fluency, but is best served when bridged effectively with comprehension. (Wojcik, 2015) Wojcik focuses on the numeracy portion of his curriculum with the ANIE. He states, “I’ve found some ways to effectively use the ANIE for other curricular areas (graphing, patterning, algebra, etc.), but I find that it can sometimes confuse nine year olds even more when trying to create estimates for patterns, or real life questions for algebra at this age. Not that it doesn’t have its place in those areas of the curriculum, but I feel that my time is best served working on the core skills that I want kids to carry with them as they move on. A strong foundation in numeracy will serve them better when they are tasked with higher thinking challenges later on in their middle school years and beyond.” For Wojcik, it takes about two months to teach the steps required to fully work through an ANIE question. After that, through the gradual release of responsibility, students can work through an ANIE question in about 15 minutes each morning, which keeps the skills sharp, and the comprehension high. Wojcik builds in lots of silly, fun real life questions, celebrates unique ideas, and has even helped create thematic ANIE worksheet pages for his own class. Wojcik states exuberantly, “Nothing like having fun while learning math!” Bird and Savage have created a revolutionary and exciting new approach to teaching and learning math. The ANIE helps students and teachers bring back a passion for learning math that has unfortunately been lacking for years. It shows how a simple change of instruction and some daily time devoted to the process, can bring about a shift in students and teachers outlook on math. Building confidence in teaching and learning any subject can bring about change and positively effect results. It is important for educators to understand the significance of such professional development and forward thinking in our community. References Auger, Wendy Frood and Rich, Sharon J. Curriculum Theory and Methods. John Wiley & Sons, Canada, Ltd. 2007. Bird, K., and Savage, K. BCPVPA Admininfo. “The Big Idea.” BC Principals and Vice Principals Association. Vol 21, No 2. Dec 2008. Bird, K., and Savage, K. The ANIE: A math assessment tool that reveals learning and informs teaching. Markham, ON: Pembroke Publishers. 2014 Johnson, Beth and vanderSandt Suriza. IUMPST: The Journal. Vol 5 (Teacher Attributes), “Math makes me sweat” The Impact of Pre-Service Courses on Mathematics Anxiety. December 2011 Savagebird Assessments, ANIE-Assessment of Numeracy in Education. WEB. 24 March, 2015 Sibbald, Tim. Ontario Mathematics Gazette. “Turning Problem solving Upside Down”-Book Review of: The ANIE. Vol 53. No 1. 28, Sept. 2014 Wojcik, Paul. Personal Interview. 24 March. 2015.
© Copyright 2024