Session M4B Addressing Second Year Retention through a Focused Programming Effort Eduardo Gandara, Rebecca Simon, Dr. Kristi J. Shryock Texas A&M University, [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Abstract - With universities seeing sustained high firstyear retention rates, the focus has now shifted to the next large hurdle with respect to retention, the sophomore or second year in the curriculum. To address issues in this second year, several universities have begun to focus efforts on this particular group of students. In the college of engineering at Texas A&M University, SophoMORE Week was piloted to target second year “slump”-causing issues specific to engineering students by creating a series of daily events during a one week period. These events encouraged second-year engineering students to interact specifically with others in their cohort. The results of a survey conducted during the events showed that students felt significantly more connected to their department and to the new friends they met during the events. In addition, students who attended a SophoMORE Week activity agreed they would return to a similar event in the future. Index Terms – Retention, second year students, sophomore slump INTRODUCTION With a large amount of programming efforts and significant changes in courses occurring in first year programs, universities have begun to experience higher retention rates at the end of this critical year. Many institutions are now facing larger losses during the sophomore or second year in the curriculum [1]. During the freshman year, most students are in a phase Molly Schaller refers to as random exploration [6]. Students are in a new environment with more freedom and tend to make decisions without consideration for the long term. During the second year, many students transition to a phase of focused exploration where concern for the future begins to influence decisions [2]. During this time, students can enter a stage classified as “sophomore slump [3]-[4].” Students may enter this “sophomore slump” for various reasons [2],[5]. For example, some students might have struggled academically-wise during their freshman year and continued to experience this struggle through the rigor of the second-year coursework, leaving them with the feeling they are not “meant to be” an engineer. This can cause students to explore new majors or leave the university during their second year. Other students who experience the “sophomore slump” might have been academically successful in their freshman coursework but begin to question their career path and alter their major selection [2],[5]. In addition to academics, relationships are also an area where students experience a transition. Students might feel disconnected from their original cohort of friends typically from various departments and colleges as they now take classes with many unfamiliar faces in departmental-specific courses [2]. Universities have begun to address issues second year students might face in a more collective manner, although most are focusing on programming efforts at the university level, as opposed to college-specific methods [5]-[8]. EVENT DETAILS In the college of engineering at Texas A&M University (TAMU), SophoMORE Week was designed as a pilot program to begin targeting “slump”-causing issues for second year engineering students. A series of daily events during a one week period was created where engineering students in the second year in their curriculum interacted specifically with others in their cohort. Similar to related efforts at other universities, the events primarily addressed areas of interpersonal relationships and academic support and opportunities [5]-[8]. Having the events focused solely on engineering students, however, provided a more unique aspect to the project at TAMU. SophoMORE Week began with a Speed-Friending & Ice Cream Social, allowing students to interact with one another. During the event, students were partnered and answered questions asked by the moderator. After spending approximately twenty seconds discussing the question, one partner was asked to rotate to the next seat, and the speedfriending continued. This created an environment where students could connect on a personal basis outside of an academic setting, such as a classroom, as some students can feel it is inappropriate to forge personal relationships in a place where academics are the primary focus. The second event of SophoMORE Week was a luncheon with academic advisors from across the college of engineering. Advisors and students were intermingled to allow for interaction outside of the typical advising session. To initiate and facilitate conversation, cards from the game TableTopics were available to each group. This event allowed students and advisors to discuss topics that are not commonly found in an advising session and become better acquainted with each other. The goal was to reduce the apprehension many students have about approaching their advisor by building interpersonal relationships. Mid Years Engineering Experience (MYEE) Conference M4B-1 March 22 – 24, 2015, College Station, TX Session M4B The third event focused on academic enrichment opportunities and included having representatives from the Career Center, the Engineering Study Abroad office, and the Engineering Academic and Student Affairs office discuss professionalism, internships, international opportunities, and undergraduate research programs. This event prompted students to think about how they, as second year students, could enhance their academic experience and emphasized the importance of an early start in building their portfolio. SophoMORE Week concluded with a social at a local bowling alley. This event helped reinforce the importance of networking and creating social support within a cohort. Students were placed in an environment where they were more apt to expand their network by meeting new people but also build social support among individuals they might have previously met at other SophoMORE Week related events. RESULTS Each of the events in SophoMORE Week was tailored to meet needs of students who might have characteristics related to the “sophomore slump.” As a result of activities during the week, students were able to meet other students and socialize with people they otherwise might not meet in class. This allowed for students to begin understanding the importance of networking with students within their engineering college as well as the importance of building a social support system that will serve them throughout their engineering program. Moreover, SophoMORE Week provided students with the opportunity to interact with their advisors on a more personal level to help build a stronger bond between them. By building relations between advisor and student, students can feel compelled to better communicate with their advisors on classes they might be struggling with or doubts they might be having about the major. In addition, SophoMORE Week provided students with the opportunity to begin thinking about career orientedsteps they could take to prepare for job fairs, as well as job searches upon graduation. In addition, students learned the importance of study abroad opportunities as well as internships, which will better prepare them as well-rounded individuals for the workforce they will enter upon graduation. Students were surveyed after each event, and the results indicated students felt significantly more connected to their department and to new friends they met during the events. Students remarked they appreciated seeing the importance of soft skills, typically not learned in the classroom, which would help them as they advanced and transitioned into their third and fourth year as students and into their professional careers. In addition, 100% of the students who attended a SophoMORE Week event said they would return to similar events in the future. CONCLUSIONS Through the program focused on second-year engineering students, participants discovered common fears and doubts about engineering and received support from peers. Moreover, SophoMORE Week provided students with the opportunity to meet engineering advising faculty and staff outside of the usual office setting and began building relationships independent of the typical end-of-semester registration appointments. The focused week-long events were built on the idea that each individual student matters and they are an important asset to the engineering community at TAMU. An important lesson learned through the incorporation of SophoMORE Week included the reliance by students on the encouragement of their faculty to participate in events. Future plans include expanding beyond a one-week setting, starting marketing efforts to students at the end of their first year in engineering, and adding a team of sophomore students to assist in the planning and implementation of the program to ensure topics covered are relevant to second year engineering students. REFERENCES [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] Higher Education in Science and Engineering: Undergraduate S&E Students and Degrees in the United States. (2002). Schaller, M. (2005). Wandering and wondering: Traversing the uneven terrain of the second college year. About Campus. Wiley & Sons, Inc. Wilder, J. S. (1993). “The sophomore slump: A complex developmental period that contributes to attrition,” College Student Affairs Journal, 12, 2, 18-27. Holloway, B. M., Reed-Rhoads, T., and L. Groll. (2010), “Defining the ‘sophomore slump’ within the discipline of engineering”, ASEE Global Colloquium on Engineering Education. Singapore. Casper, J., Khoury, A., Lashbaugh, K., & Ruesch, A. (2011). The sophomore year experience final report to Dr. Laura Coffin Koch, Associate Vice-Provost for Undergraduate Education. University of Minnesota. About the Sophomore Slump. (n.d.). Retrieved February 26, 2015, from http://loras.edu/Campus-Life/Life-at-Loras/Sophomore-YearExperience/About-the-Sophomore-Slump.aspx SOPHOMORE Week 2014. (n.d.). Retrieved February 26, 2015, from http://www.loyola.edu/department/studentengagement/students/sopho more/sophomore-week A Week for the Sophomores. (n.d.). Retrieved February 26, 2015 from https://www.iwu.edu/news/2012/09-events-sophomoreweek.html AUTHOR INFORMATION Eduardo Gandara, Graduate Assistant, Texas A&M University, [email protected] Rebecca Simon, Retention Specialist, Texas A&M University, [email protected] Mid Years Engineering Experience (MYEE) Conference M4B-2 March 22 – 24, 2015, College Station, TX Session M4B Dr. Kristi J. Shryock, Senior Director of Retention, Texas A&M University, [email protected] Mid Years Engineering Experience (MYEE) Conference M4B-3 March 22 – 24, 2015, College Station, TX
© Copyright 2024