Winter 2013 | Volume 17 | Issue 1 655 Beach Street San Francisco CA 94109-9336 www.aao.org The Newsletter of the Senior Ophthalmologist James Bond Movies Reached Age 50 in 2012 William S. Tasman, M.D., FACS T wo thousand and twelve marked fifty years since the first James Bond movie, Dr. No, appeared in theaters. I remember that particular film well because my wife, Alice Lea, and I were married in 1962. Although I had had a fellowship in retina, subspecialization was not yet in full bloom. Having just started in practice, I looked for other avenues of survival. One opportunity was moonlighting as a comprehensive ophthalmologist in Doylestown, Bucks County, Pennsylvania, which did not yet have any ophthalmologists. Two other fledgling practitioners and I would each see patients one night a week. The “office” we worked out of was in the unfinished basement of the general practitioner who had conceived the idea. Imagine seeing patients in a room where pipes run down the ceiling of the eye lane! But the patients came. At that time Doylestown was home to many show business luminaries, such as Oscar Hammerstein, II, who allegedly wrote “Oh What a Beautiful Morning” while sitting on his front porch, and Nobel and Pulitzer Prize winning author Pearl S. Buck. Just down the street from our basement office was the Doylestown movie theater. Usually Alice Lea came with me and went to the movies while I saw patients. As fate would have it, the first movie that was playing when we started our Doylestown trips was Dr. No. Just who was 007, and what was the origin of the Bond name? When Ian Fleming was writing his first Bond novel, Casino Royale, in Jamaica in 1952, he noticed a book in his library entitled Birds of the West Indies by James Bond. Fleming was somewhat of a bird watcher himself, and as he later explained, this brief Anglo-Saxon masculine name—James Bond— was what he needed for his 007 character, rather than a name such as Peregrine Carruthers. The authentic James Bond lived in Chestnut Hill, a Philadelphia suburb, with his wife Mary Wickham Bond. He was a curator at the Academy of Natural Sciences in Philadelphia. The closest I got to meeting him was when his oph- thalmologist, Dr. Francis Heed Adler (who, like Alice Lea and me, was a Chestnut Hill resident), phoned to ask if his patient James Bond, who had sustained a corneal abrasion, could call me if he had a problem over the weekend. Dr. Adler, who loved fly fishing, was off to the Poconos for the weekend, and I told Dr. Adler I’d be glad to take a look if the occasion warranted. However, the phone never rang. Though I never met the ornithologist, I did get to know his wife Mary. She authored at least seven books, including To James Bond With Love and How 007 Got His Name. She was kind enough to give me a copy of the former in 1987, when the 007 movies had been around for only 25 years. The book includes an exchange of letters between Ian Fleming and Mary. In her February 1, 1961 letter to Fleming, Mary mentions the London Times review of the new edition of Birds of the West Indies, which apparently revealed that the 007 Bond liked martinis shaken, but not stirred. A mutual friend of the Flemings and the Bonds, Mr. Charles Chaplin (not the actor) of Haverford, Pennsylvania (a mainline Philadelphia suburb), gave Mary a copy of Dr. No, in which those words are first uttered. In a letter to Mary, Fleming is apologetic about how James Bond II came to be. He then offers Mary Bond unlimited use of the name of Ian Fleming should James one day discover a particularly horrible species of bird which he would like to “christen in an insulting fashion.” 2 By my count, there have been six James Bond actors. My favorite is Sean Connery. I love how when asked his name, he says “Bond” (usually exhaling cigarette smoke), and after a pause, “James Bond.” However, I have to give high marks to Daniel Craig for “parachuting” into the 2012 London Olympics opening ceremonies with Queen Elizabeth, thereby celebrating fifty years of Bond films and the Queen’s sixty years on the British throne. James Bond films have a number of memorable features. The musical accompaniment is great. 007’s cars, guns and gadgets are spectacular as are some of the supporting characters. My favorite villain: Oddjob, with the razor-sharp brim on his hat, who dispatches his victims by throwing the hat. I’d like to have him on my frisbee team. “As I Remember It” Frank P. Philip C. Hessburg, MD I t was decades ago, during the early rush to document uses for systemic steroids in ophthalmology, and Jack Guyton, MD had just completed a successful penetrating keratoplasty with a very early version of the Hessburg trephine. All were pleased with the patient’s progress until, in a follow-up visit, Dr. Guyton noted early signs of graft rejection. As Departmental Chair, and a mathematical and surgical genius from Wilmer, all of us were aware that Dr. Guyton’s view of the use of steroids in ophthalmology could not have been exceeded in negativity. Knowing all this, but also hoping to keep a perfect graft from going sour and perhaps adding a blemish to the trephine, I convinced him to let me handle the rejection. After a few calls around the country – Mayo, Wilmer, New York, as I remember – we settled on 100 milligrams a day for weeks. Sounded fine to me! Wondrous response. In days the graft looked better. The signs of rejection melted away. Dr. Guyton grudgingly announced on rounds that “Phil’s right on this one…” At about the two week period following the inception of steroid therapy, Mrs. P., the patient’s wife, called to tell me that she didn’t know what had gotten into Frank, but he had asked for a divorce. After about another week this pious Polish Catholic decided to quit the Church, and Mrs. P. gave me another frantic call. Too ill-informed then about possible side effects of steroid use to connect this erratic behavior to my regimen, and so pleased by the gorgeous, crystal clear graft, I appeased her with some sort of “these things will hap- pen” line until a daughter of the patient called to tell me that Frank sold the business – a highly successful commercial painting company for, quite literally, a song. She noted further that, “Daddy gets stranger by the day!” Several follow-up calls to internists around the country whose names were atop steroid papers in JAMA and NEJOM revealed that, yes, occasionally patients on steroids have psychotic breaks and do really looney things. Swell! There followed a frantic phone call to Judge (and patient) O’Leary, “How do we undo everything that Mr. P. has done in the last month?” “Not all that easy, my son, but the court can, on occasion, write unofficial letters of sufficient strength to undo things.” “Please, your Honor, I’ll take care of your eye needs for the next millennium...” The letters went out from the court. And ultimately, Frank did return to his wife and to his church. He got back his business after some court wrangling, and, magically, the graft stayed clear. The vacuum trephine did survive as well, but none of us on the Senior Staff of the Department of Ophthalmology of the Henry Ford Hospital mentioned steroids again to Dr. Guyton for about a decade. As I Remember It Vignettes of the days of training and early practice SCOPE solicits interesting and entertaining vignettes of readers’ days of training and early practice. Please limit your submission to 500 words or less. Send submissions to [email protected] From the Editor’s Desk is already a classic as it leaves the author’s pen.” I couldn’t agree more. This book is beautifully written and addresses “sight” in most of its ramifications. Written for the lay reader, it has very special meaning for all who have been entrusted with the ability to help others appreciate beauty and light as they, too, have been gifted with sight by their patients for whom they have cared. Great Gifts T he 2012 holidays have just passed and this first day of the New Year is a proem for the days to come. The holidays are special in that we share gifts of appreciation and love. No longer do I need clothes and new tools; I have plenty of both. Gifts now most meaningful are donations to worthwhile charities and books. Books are the compilation of human experience and wise people learn from the experience of others. Our own life, however rich and varied, is but a drop of water in the ocean of human experience. I received three memorable books; memorable, in part, because they are quite personal for me. I have always loved the English language and reading and writing. The origin and varied meaning of words has fascinated me since college days. Thus the book, Rare Words with ways to master their meaning and use, was gratefully received. Written by a father-daughter combination, Jan and Hallie Leighton (Levenger Press), it reminds us that we forget gems that are buried in the English language. The New York Times just listed The Endgame by Michael Gordon and General Bernard Trainor (Pantheon Books, New York) as one of the ten best scholarly books of 2012. The book follows their best seller, Cobra II as the inside story of the struggle for Iraq from George W. Bush to Barack Obama. It is a hefty and fascinating account of what arguably has been “the most widely reported and least understood war in American history.” The book is special for me because the authors wrote an acknowledgement to Wesley Morgan, who they feel was “integral to the research and writing of this book… his encyclopedic knowledge of the American military and its wars, along with dogged reporting (from Iraq and Afghanistan while still a student at Princeton) added substantially to the work.” Wesley is my grandnephew with whom I’ve maintained close contact for his 24 years. He inscribed the acknowledgement, “To Papa, let’s see if you can make another 90.” Wes is now on his way to Afghanistan in search of material for a new book. Most special is the recently published, Gifts of Sight by Bruce Shields (WestBow Press) of which Frank Delaney, the author of the best seller Ireland, has said, “…(it) is meditative and Chekhovian (and) Bruce Shields is a physician, scientist, researcher, and old friend who served patients in humble and friendly fashion and learned much from them about life and sight. A world renowned authority on glaucoma, Dr. Shields is also known among friends as the consummate Mr. Nice-Guy whose help and opinions are carefully crafted and delivered with gentle authority. Now retired from academia, he spends time in a clinic providing free general eye care, writing, and enjoying life with his family. He is also a valued member of the Senior Ophthalmologist (SO) Committee and contributes to SCOPE. Get a copy of Gifts of Sight for a most pleasurable reading experience. Maybe you will find glimpses of yourself as you read about some life stories that have transformed faith, beauty and light into gifts of sight. 3 The Perfect Storm for a Killer: Video Game Addiction and Violent Video Games Andrew Doan, MD, PhD M y heart grieves for the lives lost at Sandy Hook Elementary. As the smoke clears from this tragedy, the question of violent video games and video game addiction must be addressed. Based on reports in the media, the shooter may have shot the mother in fear of being committed for mental illness, the computer was destroyed, and the shooter played hours of the game 4 ‘Call of Duty.’ In my years struggling with video game addiction during medical school and ophthalmology residency, I raged when I couldn’t play my games. When an addict does not have access to their drug of choice, in the case of video games the digital drug of choice, rage and anger are common. I envi- sion two most likely scenarios: 1) mother smashed the computer and the shooter raged; or 2) shooter smashed the computer and then raged, both being a manifestation of the acute depression followed by refractory psychosis associated with withdrawal symptoms. I’ve been there, and it is real. Clearly, without additional facts associated with the Sandy Hook Elementary tragedy, this may only seem theoretical; however, there is hard evidence our society is ignoring. The perfect storm for the formation of a killer is mental illness combined with violent video games. A child addicted to anything is mentally ill, whether it is an addiction to drugs, alcohol, or video games. When the drug or activity of choice results in dysfunction, this is defined as addiction. Unfortunately, the medical community ignores violent video game addiction because there is no diagnostic ICD-9 code or DSM criteria, the written guide for psychiatric illnesses. As a society, we agree that pornography leads to sex crimes and deviant sexual behaviors. We generally do not give children access to pornography because of the consequences of this potentially addictive behavior. However, when a game like Grand Theft Auto allows a child to have sex with a prostitute, kill her, and steal her money, we allow teenagers to play because “It is only a game.” “It is only a game” is a ridiculous response because we do not allow our children to watch pornography, as “It is only a video.” The evidence for violence and addiction associated with video games extend beyond my personal opinion and experiences. In one national study of over 1,100 8 to 18-year-olds in the United States, Gentile found that 8.5 percent would classify as pathological gamers. Although this could be considered a somewhat small percentage, the true nature of the problem becomes clear when one considers this percentage in population terms. There are about forty million children between eight and eighteen in the United States. Approximately 90 percent of them play video games. If 8.5 percent of them are pathological, that’s over 3 million children seriously damaging multiple areas of their lives because of their gaming habits! That’s over 3 million children who probably should get some help, but most won’t because there is no medical diagnosis for the pathological use of technology. Once there is, it will be similar to the approach focusing on dysfunction. The medical diagnostic definition matters because, until there is one, insurance companies will not pay for treatment. A new study from Ohio State University that will be published in the Journal of Experimental Social Psychology shows that violent video games promote aggression. The researchers found that people who played a violent video game for three consecutive days showed increases in aggressive behavior and hostile expectations each day they played. Meanwhile, those who played nonviolent games showed no meaningful changes in aggression or hostile expectations over that period. What happens to our minds when we devote significant hours to a task or an activity? What happens to our brains when we focus hours and hours on a video game? Stickgold and his research team at Harvard University published an experiment in the research journal Science illustrating that people Virtual Futures (Fig.1) Charts ©Copyright Zone’in Programs Inc. 2012. www.zonein.ca who played the video game Tetris for seven hours over a period of three days experienced hallucinatory replay of the activities as they fell asleep. This phenomenon is referred to as “The Tetris Effect.” The game Tetris is a puzzle game where falling blocks of various shapes must be aligned to form a continuous line. When such a line is created, it disappears, and any block above the deleted line will fall. When a certain number of lines are cleared, the game enters a new level. As the game progresses, each level causes the blocks to fall faster. The game ends when the stack of blocks reaches the top of the playing field, and no new blocks are able to fall. Participants playing Tetris have reported intrusive visual images of the game at sleep onset. When a child has mental illness or addiction to video games, allowing the child’s mind to fill with intrusive, violent images is the perfect storm for a non-empathetic killer. Cris Rowan, expert in child psychology and author of the Virtual Child – The terrifying truth about what technology is doing to children, proposes the following formula for the making of a pathological killer: (technology addiction from youth, with Tetris Effect) + (violent media exposure) +/– (psychotropic medi- Building Foundations (Fig.2) cation) + (deprivation of movement, touch, human connection and nature) = pathological killer Rowan proposes that introduction of technology to children too early results in medical problems, psychological dysfunction, and failure in life (see figure 1). Rowan emphasizes that our technological society has strayed away from traditional teaching and mentoring of children that lead to desirable outcomes (see Figure 2). Whether or not there is an ICD-9 code or DSM criteria for video game and Internet addiction, I know personally it is real from my own struggles with playing 50 to 100 hours a week for more than ten years. I am not alone. I know of an ophthalmologist in his 60’s who plays World of Warcraft between patients all day and wears moisture goggles for dry eye, likely from staring at this computer screen. If this surgeon was drinking between patients, then we would not tolerate this behavior. However, because “It is only a game,” excessive and problematic video game playing is widely tolerated throughout our society. It is time that as physicians, we stand up and make a difference in our children’s lives and futures by recognizing and providing treatment options to this pervasive addiction. Andrew Doan, MD, PhD is the author of Hooked on Games, which is available in print and on the Kindle on Amazon. com. More information can be found at www.hooked-on-games.com 5 2012 Annual Meeting Review T he 2012 Joint Meeting in Chicago was a great meeting in a great city. Some of the events for Senior Ophthalmologists that took place in Chicago were: 6 Senior Ophthalmologist Lounge The SO Lounge turned out to be a great benefit for SO members who attended the Joint Meeting. In its fifth year of existence, the SO Lounge accommodated over 600 visitors, twice as many as in 2011. The lounge offered refreshments, comfortable seating, computers with internet access, an opportunity to enjoy a photo archive loop of esteemed ophthalmologists, and a wonderful location that gave our SO members total access to the meeting. We thank everyone who stopped by over the course of the meeting and took advantage of this relaxing and very convenient environment. Stay tuned for more information on the SO Lounge for 2013 in New Orleans. Senior Ophthalmologist Special Program and Reception The Senior Ophthalmologist Special Program and Reception had over 250 attendees. We heard two engaging local speakers. Lynn Osmond, Hon, AIA, CAE, President and CEO of the Chicago Architectural Foundation, was fan- Dr. Shields speaking at the 2012 Then and Now Symposium. tastic. In her presentation, Chicago’s Architectural Legacy, attendees listened to stories and viewed images of prominent Chicago buildings developed by leading architects in a variety of styles common for the period. Ms. Osmond’s presentation highlighted buildings from the mid 1800’s to the present and it was clear that the windy city has no plans of slowing down. From its skyscrapers to its bridges, amazing engineering feats have made the skyline of Chicago completely unique and unforgettable. The second presentation, “Snapshots from Deep Time: Paleontological work in the 52-million year old fossil-rich limestone’s of Southwestern Wyoming” Lance Grande, PhD was extraordinary. Dr. Grande is Senior Vice President and Head of Collections and Research at The Field Museum where he is responsible for the four academic departments (Anthropology, Botany, Geology, and Zoology), the Library, the museum’s scientific journal, Fieldiana, the interdisciplinary scientific labs, and the museum’s collection of over 25 million specimens. His presentation detailed his work in Southwestern Wyoming where he has led several excavations and has immersed himself in exploring how and when and why the area was so unique in prehistoric times. Photos of the fossils of prehistoric fish, bats, birds, etc., were described and enjoyed by all. The program concluded with members of the Academy’s Young Ophthalmologist (YO) Committee presenting the 2012 EnergEYES Award to Susan H. Day, MD. The EnergEYES Award was created in 2009 by the YO committee to annually recognize and honor an ophthalmologist who demonstrates exemplary leadership skills by energizing others to improve ophthalmology. Dr. Day follows in the footsteps of three previous EnergEYES Award recipients, David W. Parke, MD; Bruce E. Spivey, MD; and Stanley Truhlsen, MD. YO Committee members joined California Pacific Medical Center (CPMC) residents in presenting the award to Dr. Day, currently the CMPC Chair and Program Director for the Department of Ophthalmology as well as a pediatric ophthalmologist in private practice. YO committee member and former CPMC resident Christian Hester, MD, stated that “We are so honored to have the opportunity to present this prestigious award to someone as deserving as Dr. Day. Dr. Day has mentored many young ophthalmologists; she serves as a strong role model, and has displayed high energy that has motivated YOs to get involved. The 2012 YO Committee recognizes Dr. Day’s lifelong contributions and commitment to improving the careers and opportunities for future eye surgeons.” With the Blink an Eye of W. Banks Anderson, Jr., MD Ed: Rated R for violence. A s aircraft improved toward the end of WWII, pilots were blacking out because the gravitational forces generated in pulling out of steep dives cut off their brain’s circulation. Pilots would gray out, black out, and then pass out. The trove of fact and fancy that is the internet cites Antoine Lavoisier as the author of an experiment to determine just how long the brain remains sentient after its circulation is cut off. Lavoisier, born in Paris in 1743, brought quantitative chemistry into being. He established that oxygen was essential for both combustion and respiration, distinguished between elements and compounds and formulated the law of conservation of mass. His many scientific achievements were based upon careful observation, accurate measurement, and rational thought. His wife, Marie-Anne who was 13 at the time of their marriage, kept his records, translated treatises by Priestley and Cavendish and illustrated experiments. Both were from affluent families. Lavoisier’s father bought him a title in 1772. In 1775 Antoine Laurent Lavoisier (1743-1794) as a member of the Royal Gunpowder and Saltpeter Commission the couple moved into the Paris arsenal where with the help of Éleuthère Irénée du Pont they explosively improved French gunpowder. There he set up and financed his own private laboratory. He also joined his father-in-law as a partner in a lucrative private enterprise collecting taxes for the King. In 1791 the revolutionary government abolished this ferme générale business and he was evicted from the arsenal. Arrested in 1793 and marked as both a tax collector and one of the French 1%, he and the other fermiers généraux were sent to the guillotine that next spring by Robespierre’s Committee for Public Safety. Anticipating his execution Lavoisier, according to the story, arranged with a friend to count the number of eye blinks that he could do after his head came off. One assumes that he also arranged to be guillotined facing up toward the blade in order to facilitate the study. His blinking is alleged to have stopped after fourteen blinks. There is no contemporary evidence that this story is factual and plenty of logistical evidence that it is a modern fancy. The killing field of the Place de la Revolution, now the Place de la Concorde, was efficiently operated. One account says it took only thirty minutes to decapitate all 28 tax collectors. Accurately counting the eye blinks of a head toppling into a basket from a distance seems improbable if not impossible and there is no record of any observer on the platform. This is not to say that brain function doesn’t persist after decapitation. The retina, a tract of the brain, has a very high metabolic rate. Its circulation can be completely stopped by raising the intraocular pressure above arterial supply pressure as in ophthalmodynamometry. Vision will persist for 10 seconds or so following total circulatory occlusion. I can blink more than 20 times in 10 seconds so the described experiment is not totally illogical. Although it came too late for Lavoisier, the Terror soon ended as Robespierre’s head also went into that basket. A year later MarieAnne Lavoisier got back their confiscated papers along with a note that her husband had been unjustly executed. E. I. du Pont de Nemours fled to the United States and built a gunpowder mill on the banks of Brandywine creek. Joseph Priestley sought out a friendlier community on the banks of the Susquehanna. Antoine Lavoisier continues to be a source of amazing facts… and fancies. 7 Schizophrenics Anonymous David W. Parke, M.D. I 8 first met Steve five years ago. He was then 34 years old and suffered from far advanced glaucoma with great loss of peripheral vision. He had been referred by a state agency for evaluation and to establish a record of “legal blindness.” Steve was not a very pleasant person. Obtaining a history from this unkempt and quarrelsome man was quite difficult. In the eleven years that he had known he had glaucoma he had seen at least a half dozen different ophthalmologists, none of whose names he chose to divulge. He had had several surgical procedures, had been noncompliant with medications, and presently was not using eye drops. He was estranged from his family, lived in a rooming house and ate poorly. He insisted that he was not a drinker and said he was taking no drugs. He admitted to being a “loner” since childhood and had completed a year of college, but his father withdrew financial support because he didn’t study. Steve’s visual acuity was 20/30 in each eye with correction of moderately high myopia and had no trouble reading fine print. His discs were pale and showed almost complete cupping. Tensions were 24 on applanation in each eye. Confrontation fields were constricted to about 10 degrees in each eye, but he would not undergo perimetry. He refused a referral to the glaucoma service saying that all ophthalmologists were “stupid.” He just wanted me to fill out the state forms so that he could get some financial help. He didn’t want any low vision or social services. Steve returned a year later because he had lost his glasses and the state required a new prescription. After refraction he refused any further evaluation and left. It was impossible to reach him. One year ago Steve again was referred by the state. He said he wanted all the help I could provide. He was neatly dressed, clean shaven and actually pleasant. His only new visual complaint was losing his place when reading. He said that he wanted to “set the record straight” and continue his education. He was working as a volunteer clerical worker in a state run rehabilitation center. And then the past history unfolded. He lived in a neighboring state and as a teen had been referred to a psychologist because of “mood swings.” He eventually went to a psychiatric clinic where he was called bipolar and was placed on medications. At first he did well, but when he went to college he stopped his medications, began to drink heavily and also became addicted to marijuana and cocaine. Raised a strict Roman Catholic, he quit going to church, missed most of his classes and failed to communicate with his parents. Steve’s parents eventually recognized some of the magnitude of his problems, took him out of college, and enrolled him in a rehab program. In the next few years he was in and out of rehab a number of times. It was during one of these sessions that he was found to have glaucoma. His parents paid for his ophthalmologic care for a time, but eventually then gave up on him completely. Alone, he moved to Connecticut where he lived mostly on hand outs, money acquired in petty thefts or in temporary jobs. He was arrested for stealing and when it became apparent that he had great visual problems court officials referred him to state services for the blind. After the state helped him receive counseling and financial aid he continued drinking and using drugs. One day he met a former street acquaintance who somehow shamed him into attending a meeting of Alcoholics Anonymous. His relationship with AA at first was sporadic. Eventually he accepted the fact that he had a drinking problem and became an AA regular. Not only did he stop drinking, he stopped using drugs. At one meeting he had a verbal altercation with a man who had been aware that Steve sometimes exhibited belligerent tendencies. Steve had accused the man of putting a viletasting substance in his coffee. That man was a schizophrenic and confronted Steve with the proposition that he needed special help that AA could not provide. He invited Steve to attend a meeting of SA, Schizophrenics Anonymous. He protested that he was mentally ill, but fortunately agreed to go along. At his first meeting of SA Steve met a psychiatric social worker who quickly elicited the history of a past bipolar diagnosis. He arranged for professional help and Steve eventually was diagnosed as schizophrenic and started on appropriate medication. He continues with AA, but has added SA to his meetings schedule—and thus a new Steve has emerged. After a very pleasant visit, Steve agreed to undergo complete glaucoma evaluation and is now medication compliant. I see Steve every three months. He accepted referral to a state run agency to help him become computer literate using visual-auditory helps. I helped him enroll in a community college that has recognized his visual restrictions and allows greater time to complete reading assignments and testing. His aim is to earn a degree and become a rehabilitation counselor. He has reunited with his parents who provided him with a smart phone complete with email, internet and GPS capabilities. He also has returned to his church. Trends & Tidbits SA is administered through an organization called Schizophrenic and Related Disorders Alliance of America (SARDA). It is a confidential Self-Help Peer Support Group and in many respects is not unlike AA. SA helps members strive to get well and stay well. It provides information and education about schizophrenia and provides positive reinforcement, empowerment and enhances social skills and self-esteem. Catholic Horses Steve says that SA has given him peace of mind and a sense of achievement. He follows SA’s Six Steps for Recovery which encompasses admitting a need for help and choosing to be well. They discover help through inner resources and gain the ability to forgive themselves for past mistakes and to forgive others for any harm they may have inflicted. Life can be transformed by eliminating erroneous thinking that used to cause failure, fear and unhappiness. Depth of change requires recognition of a supreme being, as one understands Him, and trusting and accepting this guidance. Steve’s transformation has been amazing. I am grateful to him for teaching me about Schizophrenics Anonymous. There are many support groups available for a variety of problems. The medical profession must become attuned to the potential benefits and use of personal experiences as well as those of an evidence-based approach. Support groups can impact on how patients act upon medical information we provide with care and compassion. My favorite Christmas card in 2012 was signed, “Thanks for caring —Steve.” Further information on SA may be obtained from: SARDA, PO Box 94122, Houston, TX 77094-8222 or [email protected] B utch was at the track playing the ponies and all but losing his shirt. Then he noticed an old priest blessing the forehead of a long shot. Miraculously that horse won. The same thing happened in the next race. This really got Butch’s attention. For the next four races Butch bet on the long shot horse that the priest blessed and won every time. Butch collected his winnings and anxiously awaited the priest’s choice in the last race. The old cleric stepped onto the track and blessed the forehead of an old nag that was the longest shot of the day. The priest also blessed the eyes, ears and hooves of the horse. Butch knew he had a winner. He ran to the ATM and withdrew all of his savings then added to that the day’s winnings and placed his bet on the nag. He watched dumbfounded as his horse came in dead last. In shock he raced down onto the track and confronted the old priest. “Father, what happened? All day long you blessed horses and they won, but in the last race the horse you blessed lost by a Kentucky mile. Now, thanks to you, I’ve lost every cent I owned—all of it.” The priest nodded wisely and with sympathy. “Son, that’s the problem with Protestants, you can’t tell the difference between a simple blessing and the last rites.” 9 “As I Remember It” First Day of Gross Anatomy With Dr. Vitz Dr. Gerald Bowns received this vignette from his son Jared, who wrote it after his first day at the University of Southern California School of Medicine. O ur introduction to gross anatomy took place on Monday afternoon. Before the lecture started several second year students walked in and stood in the front row. Then Dr. Vitz walked onto the stage pushing a cadaver. He had all of us stand, said a few words about respecting the bodies we would learn from, and told us to be seated. My immediate impression was that he was young. 10 After introducing himself he proceeded to outline the structure of the course. Gross Anatomy would be the most important course we would take as medical students and without a doubt would be the most difficult. To emphasize his point, he announced that we first year students would be joined by a number of those who failed a portion of anatomy the previous year and were repeating the section(s) they had failed. I was truly amazed. What could be more humiliating than being forced to stand in front of hundreds of students as an example of poor scholarship and personal failure? “I am sure some of you will be standing here next year, so take a good look.” He then proceeded to write the word “cadaver” on the board and asked if anyone knew how to pronounce it. Without asking for a volunteer, he asked someone to pronounce the word. He did. Sounded good to me, but not to the good doctor. “I am sure most of you, if called on, would have given the same pronunciation. You would be wrong. (Pause—glares at us). The correct pronunciation is ‘cadaver’ (long “a”).” “Now how do you say this word in Spanish? You don’t know? Sit down! You will be responsible not only for knowing anatomical terms, but also for their correct pronunciation and their Spanish equivalents.” Stunned silence. Dr. Vitz asked the student his name. Vitz pronounced it incorrectly. The student (somewhat sheepishly) corrected him. This was obviously not something you were supposed to do. Dr. Vitz asked if the student suffered from delusions about his importance, and whether he was under the influence of drugs or alcohol. NEVER waste his time with a name. We will study the anatomy of the cadavers we work with, but will also get instruction in surface anatomy. Since cadavers are often useless in this respect, we will use each other. The class will be partitioned into groups of three with two males and one female in each group. We will study the entire body and everyone is expected to participate. Hopefully the ratio will be such that there will be one circumcised and one uncircumcised male in each group. This prompted a few giggles which merited an immediate response. Did we think this is funny? A game? Things were going from bad to worse. About the curriculum. Most will find it necessary to spend much time outside of lab to master the material, in addition to several hours of textbook study each night. He gave 65 hours a week as a reasonable time commitment. A woman stood and claimed this was not fair. Dr. Vitz’ response was predictable. He gave the standard commitment to medicine speech and questioned her desire to become a physician. She sat down. He then launched into a discussion about nerves and pointed out that our cadavers were relatively fresh and still had some function in their nerves. To demonstrate this fact, he and an assistant moved to the cadaver and positioned their hands under its back. They found the nerve they were looking for and a leg rose in the air. As he was speaking, he spelled out a mnemonic on the board. Our unease and incredulity started to fade as we realized what was being spelled, and most people stopped taking notes. The message? G-O-T-C-H-A! The entire one and a half hour ordeal was a traditional hazing produced by the second years for our benefit. Academy Foundation Looking Back and Forging Ahead By B. Thomas Hutchinson, MD B. Thomas Hutchinson, MD T he New Year is a natural time for reflecting on personal, professional and institutional accomplishments and for setting new goals. For me, professionally, this new year is also a time of transition – my final term as chair of the Foundation Advisory Board (FAB) and my regular letters to you end with 2012. Let me begin with the Foundation’s major past initiatives. I think that we all should be incredibly proud of the Foundation’s accomplishments over the last 30 years. Foundation funding has made many beneficial programs possible. The Museum of Vision and the National Eye Care Project were developed in the early 1980s. The Academywide campaign for The Spivey Educational Trust Fund in 1992 and more recently, the development of the Hoskins Center for Quality Eye Care and the Academy’s online education portal, the ONE Network, have been breathtakingly successful. Through innovation and a clear vision of what ophthalmologists need to better serve patients, we are achieving results today – now on a global scale – that have exceeded most expectations. By any measure, the work of the Foundation has benefited both our patients and our profession. We must continue to champion the many key Academy programs that exist, in large part, because of Foundation funding. Whether it is for public service, ophthalmic education, quality of care research, help for less fortunate colleagues in the developing world, or preserving our ophthalmic heritage, the need exists. The Foundation must be there to help. Update philanthropic giving each year by making a gift at either the Partners for Sight ($1,000) or the Leadership Council ($2,500+) level. I am also a member of the Legacy Society and I invite you to join me by including the Foundation as a beneficiary in your estate plan! However much and whenever you choose to show your support, your gifts will be appreciated! The reins of the FAB now rest in the capable hands of Dr. Christie Morse, who recently served as an at-large member of the Academy’s Board of Trustees and is currently chair of the Academy’s Ethics Committee. Christie is a good friend, a real dynamo and a tried-and-true supporter of the Academy’s mission. Please join me in strong support of both Christie and our Foundation! On a personal note, many of you know that EyeCare America (ECA) holds a special place in my heart. From its genesis as the National Eye Care Project, which started as a pilot program in three states, EyeCare America has become the largest public service program in American medicine. It has served more than 1.7 million people with the help of nearly 7,000 volunteer ophthalmologists across the United States. I am extraordinarily privileged and honored to have had the opportunity to be a part of ECA and many of the other Foundation programs these past years – a lifetime experience always to be treasured! As outgoing chair, my wish is for each of you to join me in giving back to our great profession, which provides enormous personal satisfaction for each of us and offers the opportunity to make a real impact in our patient’s lives. I hope that you will consider including the Foundation in your Dr. Christie Morse As I continue on the FAB, I hope to stay in contact with you, my valued Academy Seniors colleagues, for the duration. My e-mail address is [email protected]. May we all have a happy, healthy 2013! 11 SCOPE The Senior Ophthalmologist Newsletter P.O. Box 7424 San Francisco, CA 94120-7424 Editor David W. Parke, M.D. North Branford, CT Associate Editors W. Banks Anderson Jr., M.D. Durham, NC William S. Tasman, M.D. Philadelphia, PA “As I Remember It” My Oldest Cataract Patient By E. Fredrick Bloemker M.D. I have been practicing ophthalmology for over 40 years. One of my more interesting patients was a 99-year-old lady that I first saw in 1984. Her first name was Priscilla, which is a name from the 19th century in which she was born. Her insurance was a closed panel HMO and I was not a member of this HMO. She came to me for a second opinion. She was well-dressed and was very “with it.” Her best corrected visual acuity was 20/50 in either eye. She was still driving and played bridge five days a week. She stated that her reduced vision was making her an unsafe driver. According to her, her insurance company would not allow her cataract surgery because she was” too old.” I sent a letter to her insurance company requesting that they allow one of their ophthalmologists perform the surgery. The request was denied. The patient then decided to have me do her cataract surgery on her right eye. The surgery was done with a 20/20 result. Now the lady wanted to have her left eye cataract removed. She is now 20/20 in her right eye and 20/50 in her left eye. I asked her to see me again in six months at which time she was 99 ½. I thought for sure that I could put her off. She couldn’t live forever. I kept having her return at six-month intervals. At her next six appointments, she was 100 years of age, 100 ½, 101, 101 ½, 102, 102 ½. Finally, when she was 103 years of age, she came in with her 79-yearold son. He said “Doc, you have to take the cataract out of my mother’s left eye because she’s driving the family nuts”. She was still mentally alert and playing bridge five days a week. I did do the surgery when she was 103. I did get a lot of ribbing from my cohorts about doing cataract surgery on someone that old. She had a very good result and was one of my most appreciative patients. She lived to be 106. Subsequently, I have used this story when any of my patients states that they are “too old” to have cataract surgery. It has convinced many elderly patients to go ahead with cataract surgery. This taught me that you can’t make decisions based solely on the age of the patient. It still brings a smile to my face whenever I think of this lovely lady. Assistant Editor Neeshah Azam AAO, San Francisco, CA Senior Ophthalmologist Committee Harry A. Zink, M.D. Chair Wooster, OH Susan H. Day, M.D. San Francisco, CA H. Dunbar Hoskins, M.D. Belvedere, CA David W. Parke, M.D. North Branford, CT M. Bruce Shields, MD Burlington, NC Gwen K. Sterns, M.D. Rochester, NY Martin Wand, M.D. Farmington, CT C.P. Wilkinson, MD Baltimore, MD Tamara R. Fountain, M.D. Secretary for Member Services Chicago, IL Staff Gail Schmidt Neeshah Azam Design Lourdes Nadon P.O. Box 7424 San Francisco, CA 94120-7424 Tel. 415.561.8500 Fax 415.561.8533 www.aao.org/careers/seniors
© Copyright 2024