1. Mrs Jones’ First Consultation
MCD Genetics Alexandra Burke-Smith 1. Mrs Jones’ First Consultation Dr Andrew Walley ([email protected]) She is pregnant She has heard that 1 in 50 babies born have a congenital malformation Her uncle has haemophilia Her husband’s first cousin has a child with Cystic Fibrosis She is 35 (relatively old for pregnancy) This is her first pregnancy She is 7 weeks pregnant Her mother had 4 miscarriages and 4 normal children (family history needs to be taken into account) 1. Congenital Abnormalities Congenital abnormalities are apparent at birth in 1 in 50 of all newborn infants 20-25% of all deaths during perinatal period and childhood up to the age of 10 years Genetic factors contribute to about 40% of all congenital abnormalities 1. Malformation – primary structural defect e.g. atrial septal defects, cleft lip. This usually involves a single organ showing multifactorial inheritance (i.e. not just genetic) 2. Disruption – secondary abnormal structure of an organ or tissue e.g. amniotic band causing digital amputation. Caused by ischaemia (inadequate flow of blood to a particular body part), infection, and trauma. Not genetic, but genetic factors can predispose. 3. Deformation – abnormal mechanical force distorting a naturally formed structure e.g. club foot, hip dislocation. Occurs late in pregnancy and has a good prognosis as the organ is normal in structure, just physically malformed 4. Syndrome – consistent pattern of abnormalities with a specific underlying cause, e.g. Down syndrome. Collection of abnormalities, usually genetic e.g. Chromosomal abnormalities 5. Sequence – multiple abnormalities initiated by primary factor e.g. reduced amniotic fluid leads to Potter sequence. Could have genetic component as initial factor, i.e. not due to a single genetic initially, e.g. Oligohydramnios – reduced volume of amniotic fluid due to failure to produce urine, which is classically due to bilateral renal agenesis (Potter, 1946) 6. Dysplasia –abnormal organisation of cells into tissue e.g an abnormal development of epithelium, bone or other tissues such as thanatophoric dysplasia (severe skeletal disorder characterized by extremely short limbs and folds of extra (redundant) skin on the arms and legs), as well as a large head and a small thorax. Is caused by single gene defect in the FGFR3 gene, and carries a high recurrence for siblings and offspring of the affected person. This gene provides instructions for making a protein that is involved in the development and maintenance of bone and brain tissue. Mutations in this gene cause the FGFR3 protein to be overly active, which leads to the severe disturbances in bone growth that are characteristic of thanatophoric dysplasia. 7. Association –non-random occurrence of abnormalities not explained by syndrome. Cause is typically unknown. e.g. VATER association: Vertebral Anal Tracheal Esophageal Renal. It is a non-random association of birth defects. The reason it is called an association, rather than a syndrome is that while all of the birth defects are linked, it is still unknown which genes or sets of genes cause these birth defects to occur. Classification of an association is not mutually exclusive (i.e. can get one as a result of another) e.g a primary malformation of kidneys can lead to the same sequence of events as Potters syndrome – risk estimates of inheriting the disorder is therefore a problem. 1 MCD Genetics Alexandra Burke-Smith 8. Dysmorphism – an unusual or abnormal physical feature (sometimes as part of a genetic syndrome) e.g. hypertelorism (abnormality which results in an increased distance between two organs e.g. eyes) 2. Chromosomes and Genetics DNA contains genes which are packaged as chromosomes, all of which make up the human genome. Chromosome numbers: the diploid number you inherit makes up the entire genome. In humans this is 22 autosomes and one sex chromosome from each parent (23 pairs) DNA Packaging problem: 2 metres of DNA in each cell of the body, therefore extreme packaging must occur to fit into a chromosome. The chromosome Long thread-like structure composed of DNA and associated proteins that carries the genetic information of an organism. There are 3 types: Metacentric: two equally long arms Submetacentric: one set of “short arms” Acrocentric: one set of chromatids (arms) virtually non existant- but rather seen as “satellites” Banding Nomenclature: Bands are labelled according to the chromosome number, short (p) or long (q) arm and numbered out from the centromere . This is used to identify different chromosomes. Imaging: FISH (Fluorescent in-situ hybridisation) is a way of probing chromosomes, highlighting specific areas on the chromosome e.g. the centromere. The human karyotype: a display of the full set of chromosomes of a cell arranged with respect to size, shape and number. 3. Chromosome Abnormalities Chromosome abnormalities are present in: 60% of early spontaneous miscarriages, 4-5% of still births, 7.5% of all conceptions, and 0.6% of live births There are three types: Numerical – aneuploidy, loss or gain (change in total number) Structural – translocations, deletions, insertions, inversions, rings Mosaicism – different cell lines Autosomal Aneuploidy • • • Monosomy - loss of a single chromosome is almost always lethal Trisomy - gain of one chromosome can be tolerated Tetrasomy - gain of two chromosomes can be tolerated The loss of a chromosome gives a reduction of 50% of all fully expressed gene products, whereas the gain of one chromosome gives an increase of 33% of all fully expressed gene products. Therefore trisomers are more common than monosomers as it results in a smaller change in the expressed gene. Translocations, i.e. partial aneuploidy • Balanced: the “swap of areas” on the homologous chromosomes during meiosis. The chromosomes are still a normal length therefore this is unlikely to have a significant effect. • Unbalanced: the swap results in the chromosomes not being of normal length, and the total DNA on each chromosome is not equal, therefore they are more likely to cause disease Trisomy 21: Down syndrome • Overall incidence at birth is approx 1 in 650 to 1 in 700 • Strong association between incidence and advancing maternal age, i.e. >40 poses significant risk 2 MCD Genetics • Alexandra Burke-Smith Clinical features: Newborn period - sleepy, excess nuchal skin Craniofacial - macroglossia, small ears, epicanthic folds, upward sloping palpebral fissures, Brushfield spots Limbs – single palmar crease, wide gap between first and second toes Cardiac - A and V septal defects Other - short stature, duodenal atresia NB: Nuchal is back of neck Macroglossia is the medical term for unusual enlargement (hypertrophy) of the tongue. Palpebral fissue is the gap between upper and lower eyelids Brushfield spots are characteristic white spots in iris Atresia is a condition in which a body orifice or passage in the body is abnormally closed or absent • • • • • • IQ scores 25-75 happy and affectionate Relatively advanced social skills Adult height around 150 cm Relatively normal life expectancy but Cardiac anomaly causes early death in 20% Increased risks of leukaemia and Alzheimer’s • 95% of all Down cases are caused by non-disjunction (not splitting properly) during meiosis 4% of all cases are caused by translocations; the breakage of acrocentric chromosomes and fusion of their long arms 1% of all cases are caused by mosaicism; occurs after the zygote is formed, and depending on when it occurs, you will be able to determine the proportion of affected cells in the body. • • Monosomy X: Turner’s syndrome • 1 in 3000 live female births • Generalised oedema and swelling in neck region can be detected in 2nd trimester • Can look normal at birth or have puffy extremities and intra-uterine oedema • Low posterior hairline, short 4th metacarpals, webbed neck, aorta defect in 15% of cases • Normal intelligence • In adults: • short stature - 145 cm without Growth Hormone treatment due to loss of SHOX gene • ovarian failure - primary amenorrhoea and infertility • Treatment -oestrogen replacement for secondary sexual characteristics and prevention of osteoporosis • 80% due to loss of X or Y chromosome in paternal meiosis • Also ring chromosome, single arm deletion, mosaicism in X chromosome Ring Chromosome: Breaks occur on the ends of the two arms of a chromosome and the sticky ends are then joined and the fragments are lost. These are often unstable at mitosis and so mosaicism is frequent. Some cells have the ring and the rest are monosomic. Sex Chromosome Aneuploidy • Female has two X chromosomes, but other one is required. The Y chromosome is short and carries very few genes, carries SRY gene- determines maleness • Polysomy X in females: 47,XXX karyotype 10-20 point decrease in IQ No physical abnormalities 95% have extra maternal X arising in meiosis I Normal fertility 48,XXXX and 49,XXXXX karyotypes show mental retardation Not as devastating due to X-inactivation 3 MCD Genetics • Alexandra Burke-Smith Polysomy X in males: Klinefelter’s syndrome (47,XXY) 1 in 1000 male live births o clumsiness, verbal learning disability 10-20 pts o taller than average (long lower limbs) o 30% - moderately severe gynaecomastia o all infertile o increased risk of leg ulcers, osteoporosis and breast carcinoma in adult life X chromosome from either Male or Female 48,XXXY and 49,XXXXY are rare 4. Sex Determination • • Chromosomal Sex and Gender: it is possible to be chromosomally one gender and phenotypically the opposite SRY gene activated at 6 weeks post-conception signalling the development of the testes XX males: Translocation of the SRY male determining gene from Y chromosome to an X chromosome. Phenotypically male, testes develop, but sterile because some genes on Y chromosome needed for spermatogenesis. XY females: Mutations or deletions of SRY gene leads to phenotypically female who is infertile 5. Genomic Disorders Recurrent Microdeletion Disorder: due to very small (not visible on the karyotype) deletions in the DNA sequence • • Di George Syndrome: most common microdeletion disorder. Approx 1/4000 live births. Variable symptoms such as Congenital Heart Disease,Palatal abnormalities Cri du Chat Syndrome: Severe psychomotor and mental retardation. Characteristic Facies. Characteristic catlike cry in newborns. Rare – Approx 1 in every 50000 live births. Mrs Jones She has elevated risks of miscarriage and congenital abnormalities because of her age and family history We need to further investigate the fact that she has mentioned haemophilia and cystic fibrosis within her family 4 MCD Genetics Alexandra Burke-Smith 2. Mrs Jones (2)- risk of transmission of genetic disease Dr Andrew Walley ([email protected]) 1. Genetic Disease Monogenic disorders Are familial, i.e. occur as a direct consequence of a single gene being defective and are passed on from one generation to the other They have a specific mode of inheritance e.g. Mendelian They can be common and rare Eg. Huntington disease, Cystic fibrosis, Haemophilia Complex disorders likely associated with the effects of multiple genes in combination with lifestyle and environmental factors. Although complex disorders often cluster in families, they do not have a clear-cut pattern of inheritance. Can also be sporadic Influenced by environmental factors e.g. diet, lifestyle etc Cause of many common disorders Eg. Type 2 diabetes Obesity Parkinson’s disease Mendelian Inheritance The process whereby individuals inherit and transmit to their offspring one out of the two alleles present in homologous chromosomes. Alleles Alternate forms of gene or DNA sequence at the same chromosome location (locus) Homologous chromosomes are a matching (but non-identical) pair, one inherited from each parent Homologous chromosomes can have different alleles There can also be multiple alleles present at the same locus Different alleles may be described as mutations or polymorphisms Mutation: any heritable change in the DNA sequence. This is a change in the genotype which has a definite effect on the phenotype, e.g. causing disease Polymorphism: The occurrence of a chromosome or genetic characteristic in more than one form, which results in the coexistence of different phenotypes within a population, e.g. different hair colours. Polymorphisms may contribute to complex diseases Types of Mutation Missense: a point mutation (change in a single base pair) which then codes for a different amino acid. This doesn’t mean it will definitely affect the protein function, for example if the change did not affect the active site. Nonsense: a point mutation results in the formation of a stop codon, which leads to premature termination of the polypeptide chain, which can have a significant effect on the function of the protein. Insertion: of a nucleotide can create a frameshift, as the genetic code is read in triplets. This can result in a completely different protein being coded for Deletion: can also create a frameshift, but if 3bp are deleted this may have no effect. 5 MCD Genetics Alexandra Burke-Smith 2. Pedigree Diagrams Why draw them? To identify genetic disease running in family (complex and monogenic) To identify inheritance patterns To aid diagnosis To assist in management of conditions To identify relatives at risk of disease 1) Build up the tree from the ‘bottom’ starting with affected child and siblings 2) Record names, dates of birth 3) Choose one parent. Ask about sibs and their children, then parents 4) Record names, dates of birth and maiden names (could be used to identify common ancestors which can help with inheritance pattern) 5) Ask for miscarriages, stillbirths or deaths in each partnership 6) Ask about children through other partnerships 3. Mendelian Inheritance Patterns Autosomal Dominant At least one affected parent- doesn’t skip generations Transmitted by Male or Female Vertical transmission Males or Females affected Each child has a 50% chance of being affected E.g. Huntington Disease • Motor, cognitive, and psychiatric dysfunction: ‘hyperkinesia’ (excessive uncontrollable movements) • Affects dopamine signalling in the basal ganglia • Mean age of onset is 35 to 44 years, therefore it is often passed on as parents have children before the onset • Median survival time is 15 to 18 years after onset • Treatment can ease symptoms, but no cure HTT gene on chromosome 4 encodes a protein called huntingtin HD patients inherit one copy of a mutated form of the huntingtin gene altered gene encodes a toxic form of the protein that form ‘clumps’ cell death in basal ganglia of the brain, leading to symptoms Dominant Anticipation Anticipation is the increase in severity and/or earlier onset of symptoms in each generation - Each generation gets it younger - Huntington Disease is caused by an unstable CAG triplet repeat (coding for glutamine): the number of repeats may expand with each generation as DNA polymerase loses its place in the sequence. Autosomal Recessive • • • • No affected parent Transmitted by M or F Usually no family history M or F affected 6 MCD Genetics Alexandra Burke-Smith • 25% of children affected • 50% inherit one copy of defective gene; i.e. they are carriers • Requires two affected genes • Requires genetic testing • Tends to be more frequent where an element of consanguinity is involved E.g. Cystic Fibrosis • A chronic, life-threatening condition • Thick mucus in lungs causes breathing problems and repeated infections • Blockages in pancreas affect digestive enzymes • Treatment consists of daily enzymes and physiotherapy • In the UK, 1 person in 22 is a CF carrier (no symptoms) • Most common mutation is the deletion of phenyl alanine (delta F508) which affects folding of CFTR protein and prevents it from moving to its correct place (the cell membrane) • The CFTR gene on chromosome 7 encodes a protein called the CF transmembrane conductance regulator CF patients inherit two copies of a mutated form of the CFTR gene Absence of any working CFTR protein affects chloride ion channel function in ‘wet’ epithelial cells Disruption of salt /water regulation causes thick mucus and leads to symptoms • CF testing now part of UK newborn screening programme • • • • Congenital absence of the vas deferens (CAVD) is a condition in which the vasa deferentia fail to form properly, therefore sperm are made but are not transported to the epidymis. Causes infertility (azoospermia) Affects around 1 in 2500 men Most cases of CAVD are caused by mutations in the CFTR gene X-linked disorders • • • • • • • No affected parents M affected Transmitted by carrier F 50% sons affected 50% daughters carriers Mutations on X chromosome Majority are recessive, and as there is no homologous section on the Y chromosome therefore expressed E.g. Haemophilia • A blood-clotting disorder • Affected people bruise easily, and bleed for longer • Two main types, A and B, which together affect about 6500 people in the UK • Can be successfully treated with injections of clotting factor • The F8 gene on the X chromosome a protein called coagulation factor VIII Boys with Haemophilia A inherit patients inherit one copy of a mutated form of the F8 gene Lack of functioning Factor VIII causes symptoms of disorder • X-linked because the genes involved are located on the X-chromosome, recessive because carrier females are unaffected (they have a working F8 or F9 gene on their other X-chromosome • Haemophilia B is caused by mutations in the F9 gene, also on the X chromosome • F9 gene codes for coagulation factor IX • Symptoms are identical to those of Haemophilia A • Haemophilia B is much rarer than Haemophilia A Genetic Heterogeneity • • • • Same gene, different mutations, different diseases - eg. cystic fibrosis and CAVD are both caused by mutations in the CFTR gene Same disease, different genes – eg. Haemophilia A (mutations in F8 gene) and Haemophilia B (mutations in F9 gene) Same disease, different genes, different inheritance patterns – eg. different forms of epidermolysis bullosa can be autosomal dominant or autosomal recessive This adds complexity 7 MCD Genetics Alexandra Burke-Smith Complexity of Inheritance Patterns • • • • Penetrance – frequency with which symptoms are present in an individual who inherits a disease-causing mutation, i.e. frequency of phenotype associated with a particular genotype Variable expressivity – degree of severity in an individual who inherits a disease-causing mutation Phenocopy - disease with the same phenotype as a genetic disease, but non-genetic, e.g. autoimmune form of Haemophilia Epistasis – interaction between disease gene mutations and other modifier genes can affect phenotype 4. Mechanisms of genetic disease • • • Dominant conditions: usually caused by gene mutations that results in a toxic protein (eg. HD) – ie. effects of mutated gene ‘mask’ normal copy Recessive conditions: Caused by absence of working protein (eg. CF, haemophilia) – ie. effects of mutated gene only seen when normal copy absent Co-dominant conditions: Effects of both mutated and normal genes apparent in people with both, e.g. sickle cell trait, ABO blood grouping Implications for Therapy • • Dominant conditions – need to counter effects of, or neutralise toxic protein, or ‘switch off’ mutant gene, therefore harder to treat Recessive conditions – need to restore activity of missing protein, by replacing genes, protein or affected tissues, e.g. use of replacement clotting factors in Haemophilia Mrs Jones Haemophilia • Her uncle has haemophilia BUT its her paternal uncle. Therefore the chance of a son with haemophilia requires a new mutation Cystic Fibrosis • • • • • • Her husband’s first cousin has a child with CF therefore Mrs Jones’ husband has a 1:8 chance of being a CF carrier. (1/2 chance from each parent, and ½ chance of being passed onto next generation therefore ½ x ½ x ½ = 1/8) Mrs Jones has a 1:22 chance of being a CF carrier (UK population chance) If both are carriers there is a 1:4 the child is affected Therefore the overall chance of affected foetus = 1/704 = 1/8 x ½ x 1/22 The overall chance that foetus is affected by CF is based on chance that both parents are carriers – without genetic testing we cannot tell if the husband is a carrier or not – multiplied by the individual risk to each child This proves the need for a detailed family history 8 MCD Genetics Alexandra Burke-Smith 3. More Stories from the Genetic Clinic Dr Andrew Walley ([email protected]) 1. Imprinting Disorders Genetic imprinting refers to a situation where genes are expressed differently according to whether they are inherited on the chromosome that came from the mother or that from the father There are cases of 46,XX where genome is only from one parent - Maternal – Ovarian Teratoma - Paternal – Hydatidiform Mole The genome carries an imprint of its parental origin Imprinting is a reversible epigenetic effect, i.e. it is not a result of a change in the primary sequence of DNA, but rather through DNA methylation of cytosines. The imprinted domain is the place where DNA Methylation occurs Uniparental Isodisomy: Non-Disjunction in Meiosis II (i.e. failure of chromosomes to separate). Fertilisation of normal monosomic gamete then occurs, but there is a loss of chromosome from parent contributing the single chromosome. Prader-Willi Syndrome vs Angelman Syndrome Two distinct clinical syndromes Same chromosomal region involved on Chr15 Result from loss of function of one of the two parental chromosomes - Paternal = Prader-Willi - Maternal = Angelman 9 MCD Genetics Alexandra Burke-Smith Prader- Willi (PWS) Symptoms include Muscle hypotonia Hyperphagia (all-consuming appetite) Obesity/Type 2 Diabetes Mental retardation Short stature Small hands and feet Delayed/Incomplete Puberty Infertile Prevalence 1:10,000 to 1:25,000 for birth incidence Management Hyperphagia managed by diet restriction Exercise to increase muscle mass and to combat Hypertonia Growth Hormone treatment for short stature Hormone replacement at puberty Diagnosis Methylation-specific PCR (polymerase chain reaction) Genetic Mechanism Lack of a functional paternal copy of the PWS critical region on 15q11-q13 chromsome ~70% result from deletion of the critical region on the paternal chromosome ~25% result from inheritance of two maternal copies by uniparental isodisomy ~5% are due to translocations, point mutations Angelman Symptoms include Severe developmental delay Poor or absent speech Gait ataxia (uncontrollable unsteady movements that result from the brain’s failure to regulate the body’s posture, strength and direction of movements) “Happy demeanour” Microcephaly (abnormal smallness of the head) Seizures Prevalence 1:10, 000 (so similar prevalence to PWS, but more severe) Management Symptomatic treatment– anti-convulsant, communication therapy Physiotherapy for gait ataxia Normal life span Diagnosis Clinical Features and Molecular Diagnostics Genetic Mechanism Lack of a functional maternal copy of the PWS critical region on 15q11-q13 chromsome 2. Mitochondrial Disorders Mitochondrial Inheritance Inheritance pattern quite distinctive Initial mutation often in protein pumps present in the mitochondria (important in respiration etc) Transmission is exclusively through females- sperm may contain mitochondria for movement, but they do not inject their mitochondria into the ova. Affects both males and females Cells vary in their number of mitochondria depending on energy requirements; Numbers from 1 to>1000 per cell Disease can be very variable because of heteroplasmy- there are different numbers of mitochondria in different cells, therefore only certain cells will be affected by the disease Mitochondrial Genome ~16kb 37 genes 13 for respiratory chain complexes 22 for tRNA 2 for rRNA 2-10 copies per mitochondrion Replicates its own DNA 10 MCD Genetics Alexandra Burke-Smith Most of the active genes/proteins are encoded by the nucleus Disorders typically occur by point mutations Mitochondrial Disorders • • • • • • MELAS LHON MERRF – Myoclonic Epilepsy with Ragged Red Fibres DEAF – Non-syndromic hearing loss NARP – Neuropathy, Ataxia and Retinitis Pigmentosa MELAS Mitochondrial myopathy, Encephalopathy, Lactic Acidosis and Stroke Progressive neurodegenerative disorder. Symptoms include Muscle Weakness Episodic Seizures and headache Hemiparesis- paralysis of one side of the body Vomiting Dementia Prevalence Estimated prevalence of 1:13 000 Management Symptomatic Treatment Diagnosis Diagnosis by muscle biopsy Genetics Single point mutations in several genes MTTL1 – tRNA translates codon as Phe instead of Leu during mitochondrial protein synthesis MTND1, MTND5 – NADH dehydrogenase (Complex 1) LHON Leber’s Hereditary Optic Neuropathy For unknown reasons, this is much commoner in males (suggests X-linked effect) Average age is mid-twenties to mid-thirties Age range is wide though (6-62yrs) Symptoms include Bilateral, painless, loss of central vision and optic atrophy Most will become blind Typically one eye will be affected first Prevalence Estimated prevalence of 1:50 000 Management Symptomatic Treatment Diagnosis Diagnosis is on the basis of opthalmological findings and a blood test for mtDNA (mitochondrial DNA) mutations Genetics >90% of the mutations are in o MTND1, MTND4, MTND5, MTND6 and MTCYB o NADH dehydrogenase subunits 1,4,5 and 6 o Cytochrome B 11 MCD Genetics Alexandra Burke-Smith 3. Inborn Errors of Metabolism “one gene-one enzyme” concept More than 200 diseases knownMostly autosomal recessive or Xlinked. A few are dominant (ratelimiting step or part of a multimeric complex) The defective proteins are mainly enzymes found in the mitochondria These are relatively easy to treat if found early 4. UK Newborn Screening Programme Introduced as early diagnosis improves treatment. Screens newborns for : Phenylketonuria (PKU) Congenital Hypothyroidism Sickle Cell Disorders Cystic Fibrosis Medium-Chain Acyl-CoA Dehydrogenase Deficiency (MCAD Deficiency) Phenylketonuria (PKU) Occurs relatively quickly after birth Severe mental retardation and convulsions Blond hair/blue eyes; eczema Phenylalanine hydroxylase deficiency, therefore phenylalanine is unusually processed, i.e. normal metabolism does not occur and compensatory mechanisms occur. Phenylalanine accumulates and is converted to phenylpyruvic acid - excreted in urine Tyrosine deficiency - reduced melanin and accumulation of homogentisic acid Thyroxine definciency- hormone involved with increase of the basal metabolic rate. Alkaptonuria- accumulation of homogentisic acid causes dark brown discoloration of the skin and eyes, and progressive damage to the joints, especially the spine. Treatment Newborn screening for elevated levels of phenylalanine in blood Remove phenylalanine from diet Difficult diet to stick to. Best foods to eat are fruits and vegetables- difficult with children. 12 MCD Genetics Alexandra Burke-Smith Aspartame contains phenylalanine Pregnant women need to go back on diet MCAD Deficiency Commonest disorder of fatty-acid oxidation Episodic hypoketotic hypoglycaemia (no ketones, blood sugar) Commonly presents > 3 months Frequency of 1:8000 to 1:15000 births Can present as coma, metabolic acidosis, encephalopathy Sudden death can occur, with a 25% mortality rate undiagnosed cases- major reason for screening MCAD is Medium-Chain Acyl-CoA Dehydrogenase MCAD gene is called ACADM Treatment simple- maintains diet of readily usable glucose energy. Maintenance of adequate calorie intake to prevent switch to fatty acid oxidation, and avoiding fasting. low in 13 MCD Genetics Alexandra Burke-Smith 4. Cancer in families and Individuals Dr Alistair Reid ([email protected]) 1) Explain the terms somatic mutation and loss of heterozygosity and explain their implications for oncogenesis and cancer progression 2) Discuss how mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes influence risk of breast and ovarian cancer 3) Outline how defects in DNA repair influence risk of colorectal cancer Explain the terms somatic mutation and loss of heterozygosity and explain their implications for oncogenesis and cancer progression 4) Describe, using specific examples, how acquired genetic changes are used as disease markers Overview Cancer is driven by an accumulation of genetic or epigenetic changes that lead to altered levels of transcription and/or aberrant gene transcripts. These activate signal transduction pathways that confer a selective advantage to the cell, e.g. drug resistance. Cancer may be sporadic or familial, and mutations may be infected or acquired Somatic mutations: Alterations in DNA that occur after conception. Somatic mutations can occur in any of the cells of the body except the germ cells (sperm and egg) and therefore are not passed on to children. These alterations can (but do not always) cause cancer or other diseases. Oncogenes and Tumour Suppressors Normal functions of TS genes Regulating cell division DNA damage checkpoints (damage=no division)- After DNA damage, cell cycle checkpoints are activated. Checkpoint activation pauses the cell cycle and gives the cell time to repair the damage before continuing to divide. DNA damage checkpoints occur at the G1/S (Gap 1/Synthesis) and G2/M (Gap 2/ Mitosis) boundaries. An intra-S checkpoint also exists Apoptosis: normal, benign type of programmed cell death in which a cell shrinks, fragments its DNA, and alters its surface so as to activate the cell’s phagocytosis by macrophages DNA repair Mutations in the TS genes result in an inactivation or deletion of the gene, leading to unregulated cell division Normal oncogene functions An oncogene (ONC) is a gene that can cause cancer. It results from the mutation of a normal gene (proto-oncogene) An oncogene is capable of both growth and proliferation of malignant transformation of normal cells It produces proteins (e.g. Growth factors, Transcription factors, Tyrosine kinases) that may transform a normal cell into a malignant cell. Mutations involving oncogenes involve activation/amplification 14 MCD Genetics Alexandra Burke-Smith Tumour Suppressor genes Most TS genes require 2 mutations for tumorigenic effect : Hit1 reduces transcript level but insufficient to cause a phenotypic effect. Requires inactivation of second allele (hit 2), causing total loss of transcription, for malignant phenotype to be conferred. A few TS genes require only one hit: Single hit causes reduction in transcription which for these genes is sufficient to have a biological effect via “haploinsufficiency”- i.e. reduction in level of protein product Identification of candidate TS genes Using Detection of loss of heterozygosity (LOH) Normal tissue: Heterozygous for both polymorphisms Malignant tissue: Homozygous (heterozygosity lost through hit 1-point mutation, and hit 2-gene deletion) Types of Genetic Changes that promote cancer Altered Levels of Transcription Novel aberrant (abnormal) transcript “Cytogenetic” changes “Molecular genetic” changes Translocation of a chromosome segment Epigenetic changes Other alteration of genetic sequence e.g. internal tandem duplication (adjacent repeat of a DNA sequence) Deletion of a chromosome or segment Point mutation frameshift Gene fusion via chromosome rearrangement Duplication of a chromosome or segment Internal tandem Duplication (ITD) Down-regulation (TS) Point mutation • Mutation in promotor region • Truncating mutation leading to degradation • Gene deletion • Epigenetic silencing (methylation, acetylation) • Caused by “2 hits” or haploinsufficiency Up-regulation (ONC) • Gene amplification • Activating mutation • Influence of new promotor via chromosome rearrangement Somatic (acquired) vs. inherited changes • The vast majority of cancer cases (approx 99%) are sporadic caused by the progressive accumulation of new genetic changes in somatic tissue (“somatic mutations”) • 1% of cases of cancer are caused by the inheritance from one parent (or occasionally both) of a high-risk “germline” mutation in a particular gene, usually tumour suppressor • Why “high risk” mutations? 1) because mutation is recessive, therefore additional somatic hit on other allele still required for inactivation 15 MCD Genetics • • Alexandra Burke-Smith 2) Could be mutation in DNA repair gene- repair is compromised but still need to wait for somatic mutation in key TS gene Predisposition is usually to particular type(s) of cancer in tissue where the function of the gene is particularly vital People carrying these mutations are at high risk of developing the associated cancer(s), but overall the mutations are responsible for only a small proportion of all cases of the cancer. (for table of mutations- see powerpoint) Inherited predisposition to breast and ovarian cancer • • • • • • Inherited mutations in the high-risk breast cancer genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 account for 80 per cent and 14 per cent, respectively, of families with both ovarian and breast cancer. They only for 2-5 per cent of breast cancer cases overall. Women who have an abnormal BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene have up to an 60% risk of developing breast cancer by age 90 Increased risk of developing ovarian cancer is about 55% for women with BRCA1 mutations and about 25% for women with BRCA2 mutations. Earlier age of onset than women without inherited BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations BRCA2 mutations also predispose to breast cancer in men as well as in women. Around three-quarters of families with cases of both male and female breast cancer carry mutations in BRCA2. Mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 are also associated with increased risks of prostate, bowel and pancreatic cancers Genetic mechanisms • BRCA1 and BRCA2 repair double-strand breaks (which may be caused by natural radiation or other exposures) in DNA in cooperation with other proteins including Rad51, thereby maintaining stability of the genome. • The double-stranded break repair mechanism that BRCA1 participates in is called homologous recombination, in which the repair proteins use an intact sequence from a sister chromatid or homologous chromosome as a template. • Hundreds of different types of mutations in the BRCA1/2 genes have been associated with an increased risk of cancer, including point mutations, several base pair deletions, whole exon deletions and amplifications. They usually result in a truncated (shortened) non-functional protein • Inactivation of a second BRCA allele in a cell would generally result in cell death. The rare BRCA-deficient cell that escapes death to become malignant does so via acquisition of inactivating mutations in other critical checkpoint (TS) genes, allowing it to proliferate and conferring a survival advantage Inherited predisposition to bowel cancer FAP and HNPCC Two well-known familial bowel cancer syndromes are caused by high-risk mutations in known genes: 1) Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), accounts for <1% of all colorectal cancers and is caused by a mutation in the APC (Adenomatous polyposis coli) gene. - APC- a classical tumour suppressor gene with a role in cell division via control of the WNT signaling pathway. - FAP is characterised by the growth (usually before age of 30) of thousands of intestinal polyps, one or more of which is likely to become cancerous. Virtually 100% risk of bowel cancer. Average age of onset=39 (65 in noninherited form). 2) Hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC or Lynch syndrome) is more common (3% of cases). It is caused by a fault in one of a family of DNA repair genes, called mismatch repair genes. - Mutations in either MLH1 and MSH2 are most common, and account for up to 90% of familial cases. - Confer a lifetime risk of up to 80% of bowel cancer in men (the risk for women is thought to be lower), as well as an increased risk of stomach cancer. Women also have increased risks of uterine cancer (lifetime risk of 60%) and ovarian cancer (lifetime risk of 12%). 16 MCD Genetics Alexandra Burke-Smith MYH polyposis • A more recently discovered less common bowel cancer syndrome, MYH polyposis, is autosomal recessive – two mutated alleles of the MYH gene (mutY Homologous also known as MUTYH) need to be inherited in order for an individual to be affected. • Clinically, MYH polyposis resembles FAP, but the majority of affected individuals tend to have less than 100 polyps (abnormal growth of tissue from a mucus membrane), compared to the many thousands seen in individuals with FAP. • MYH is involved in Base excision repair (BER) which protects against damage to DNA from reactive oxygen species, methylation, deamination, hydroxylation and other by-products of cellular metabolism Low-risk genetic polymorphisms • • • • The tendency of cancers to aggregate in families cannot be wholly explained by rare, high-risk, inherited mutations. A substantial proportion of such cancers are thought to be attributable to the combined effects of multiple, common gene variants, known as polymorphisms, each of which is associated with a small increase in cancer risk. A number of polymorphisms that affect the risk of developing different types of cancer have already been identified. But there are likely to be many more and discovering them is the focus of intensive research. This search is being facilitated by the availability of the human genome sequence and the development of high-throughput single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array technology E.g. of a common polymorphism causing cancer: the common colorectal cancer predisposition SNP rs6983267 at chromosome 8q24 confers potential to enhanced Wnt signalling Sporadic malignancy: chromosome translocations and oncogenic fusion genes Our knowledge of the contribution of chromosomal rearrangements to cancer pathogenesis comes from “cytogenetic” investigations of malignant tissue This knowledge is most extensive in haematological malignancies (leukaemias and lymphomas) for 2 main reasons 1) Generally leukaemic genomes are more stable than those of solid tumours – therefore easier to pinpoint pathogenetic changes driving disease 2) Relative ease of performing cytogenetics on haematopoeic circulating cells – easier than with other cells Chronic Myeloid Leukaemia • A clonal myeloproliferative (divide uncontrollably without differentiating) disorder of the pluripotent haematopoeic stem cell • The type of blood cell that proliferates abnormally originates in the blood-forming (myeloid) tissue of the bone marrow. It may be acute or chronic and may involve any one of the cells produced by the marrow. • Blood cells in patients contain a reciprocal translocation between chromosomes 9 and 22, which leads to a foreshortened long arm of chromosome number 22 • 1 to 2 cases per 100,000 • 15% of all adult leukaemias • Triphasic (has three phases) - indolent (causing little or no pain) chronic phase, accelerated and terminal acute stage • Consistent pathogenomic marker t(9;22), BCR-ABL Identification of the BCR-ABL gene fusion 17 MCD Genetics Alexandra Burke-Smith Treatment Interferon-α used to be used, but now Targeted molecular therapy for CML: Imatinib (Glivec) – an effective tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), which greatly increases survival time from diagnosis. However 20-30% of patients are resistant/intolerant to Imatinib. CML treatment is monitored in three ways: 1) Haematologic , e.g. RT/ RQ(real time quantative) PCR 2) Cytogenetic 3) Molecular, e.g. FISH Sensitivities of the methods used to detect leukaemia in responding and relapsing patients BM: Bone marrow PB: peripheral blood Conventional cytogenetics: Up to 30 metaphases analysed (G-banding) Disadvantage- relatively low sensitivity, time consuming, only analyse dividing cells Advantage – robust clinical correlations, detects additional abnormalities (disease progression) See powerpoint for diagrams based on these methods Importance of cytogenetics I.e. why do we quantify outstanding disease in CML? • Cytogenetic response in first 12-18 months accurately defines response to TKI and helps guide clinical management • Absence of cytogenetic response by 12 months – change of therapy indicated • Degree of cytogenetic response over time is predictive of survival • Loss of major molecular resistance is indicator of therapy resistance and imminent relapse- change of therapy indicated 18 MCD Genetics Alexandra Burke-Smith Mechanisms of imatinib resistance A tyrosine kinase is an enzyme that can transfer a phosphate group from ATP to a protein (tyrosine residue) in a cell (substrate). It functions as an "on" or "off" switch in many cellular functions, such as regulating cellular activity including cell division. In CML, the tyrosine kinase enzyme ABL is stuck in the "on" position; imatinib binds to the ATP site of BCRABL, locking it in a closed conformation, and preventing the tyrosine kinase activity. The majority of patient’s resistance coincides with reactivation of the tyrosine kinase activity of the BCR-ABL fusion oncoprotein. This can result from gene amplification and, more importantly, point mutations that disrupt the binding of imatinib to BCR-ABL leading to the formation of the open/active conformation of the oncoprotein. This confers resistance to the drug, and the DNA mutations in the BCR-ABL oncoprotein are clinically useful markers of resistance. Second Generation Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Derivatives of Imatinib, e.g. Dasatinib and Nilotinib, are used with imatinib-resistant patients CCR (all cells normal) or MCR (>65% of cells normal) in up to 60% of imatinib non-responders Resistance remains a challenge, e.g. the T315I kinase domain mutation at amino acid 315. This leads to the change of Threonine for isoleucine, which changes the shape of the oncoprotein, resulting in the open conformation. Recurring chromosomal translocations in acute myeloid leukemia Most translocations are easy to monitor by cytogenetics and/or FISH Molecular diagnosis (RT-PCR) has only been optimised for a subset of these translocations, usually those which like CML are well controlled by therapy but not “cured” Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APML/AML-M3) Abnormal accumulation of immature granulocytes called promyelocytes 19 MCD Genetics Alexandra Burke-Smith Characterized by a chromosomal translocation involving the retinoic acid receptor alpha (RARα or RARA) gene and the promyelocytic leukemia gene (PML) on chromosome 15, a translocation denoted as t(15;17)(q22;q12) RARα/RARA is a member of the nuclear family of receptors; its ligand, retinoic acid is a form of Vitamin A and acts as a regulator of DNA transcription Translocation product is PML-RARα fusion protein. This fusion protein binds too strongly to DNA via enhanced interaction with co-repressor molecules, blocking transcription APML is unique from other forms of AML (acute myeloid leukaemia) in its responsiveness to all trans retinoic acid (ATRA) therapy, a vitamin A derivative. ATRA dissociates co-repressors allowing normal transcription and cell differentiation ATRA is not the same as other chemotherapy- it does not kill cells. It is effective when taken continuously but residual stem cells remain Like CML, APML is monitored by cytogenetics and/or FISH and/or RQ-PCR Other examples of genetic markers of sporadic malignancy with diagnostic/clinical applications Translocations involving the immunoglobulin (IgH) gene are common in lymphoid malignancy (FISH/Gbanding) – partner gene can help determine subtype Deletion of the short arm of chromosome 5 in myelodysplastic syndrome - Diagnostic marker and predicts for good response to Lenalidomide (G-banding/FISH) t(12;21) (ETV6-RUNX1) in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemmia predicts for good response to therapy (FISH/G-banding) Pharmacogenetic/prognostic: P53 (specific gene) deletions in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia and multiple myeloma predict for aggressive disease and may change patient management (FISH) HER2 (ERB2) amplification in breast cancer is a marker of aggressive disease but also predicts efficacy of herceptin. (FISH) T315I mutation in chronic myeloid leukaemia predicts resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy (direct sequencing) G-banding is a technique used in cytogenetics to produce a visible karyotype by staining condensed chromosomes. The metaphase chromosomes are treated with trypsin (to partially digest the chromosome) and stained with Giemsa. Dark bands that take up the stain are A and T rich. This is useful for identifying differences between chromosomes. 20 MCD Genetics Alexandra Burke-Smith 5. Prenatal Diagnosis Mr Ruwan Wimalasundera ([email protected]) Outline the following: 1. Indications for Prenatal Diagnosis 2. Antenatal Screening for Aneuploidy (Down Syndrome) 3. Prenatal Testing a. Amniocentesis b. Chorionic Villus Sampling c. Fetal Blood Sampling d. Elective late karyotyping 4. Cytogenetic Techniques Management options Indications for Prenatal Diagnosis I.e. why do we screen women? All pregnant women in the UK undergo two basic screenings: 1. At 12 weeks: down syndrome screening 2. At 22 weeks: structural anomaly screening Maternal age is also included in the calculations involved with screening. However, screening has an important use for women who: - Are at high Risk of aneuploidy (chromosome abnormality) High risk on Down Syndrome screening Previous aneuploid fetus Maternal request eg. Age Have a known genetic disorder within the family - Achondroplasia (where the bones of limbs fail to grow to normal size due to a defect in both cartilage and bone) - Cystic Fibrosis - Haemoglobinopathies , eg SCA (sickle-cell) - X Linked disorder, eg haemophilia - Parental Balanced Translocation (exchange of genetic material is even so no genes extra or missing) Have a structural anaeuploidy detected in fetus on routine ultrasound screening Down Syndrome - Most common form of mental retardation in UK (1 in 700 pregnancies), not inherited Often associated with birth defects- including cardiac, renal, GI abnormalities Variable severity, not predictable by scan Due to extra chromosome: Trisomy 21 Standard trisomy 21 - 95% (extra chromosome) translocation - 4% (tripled genetic material, but only two chromosomes) mosaic - 1% (mix of normal and mutated chromosome 21- cannot predict severity) Trisomy: a condition in which there is one extra chromosome present in each cell in addition to the normal diploid set. Risk increases with woman’s age due to the fixed number of ova when a female is born. This has an exponential increase after 35. 21 MCD Genetics Alexandra Burke-Smith Down Screening Maternal Age Nuchal Tranlucency- skin behind neck more “loose” therefore there is more fluid present Serum Screening Can look at biochemical markers (first trimester serum markers) released by the placenta: - PAPP A - Unconjugated estriol - AFP - Inhibin - Free beta hCG Individually these tests have many false positives before diagnosis Want the highest detection for the lowest false positive rate Combined test at 10-136 weeks: NT measurement, with free beta Hcg, PAPP A and maternal age consideration This is responsible for 90% of down baby diagnosis, with only approx 5% false positives Nasal Bones - 3D fetal ultrasonography is useful for showing parents what the abnormality is - Some fetuses show complete absence of nasal bone ossification (the synthesis of bone from cartillage), while others show markedly shorter nasal bones than genetically normal fetuses of the same gestational age - 85% sensitivity with a 1% false positive rate in detecting aneuploid foetuses Limitations - Large population based study show poor utility of measurement - Racial variation- NB absent in 0.4% of normal Caucasian population and absent in 8.8% of Afro-Caribbean population - NB currently of limited value in T21 risk assessment Screening Tests - Triple test 14-21 weeks: AFP, unconjugated oestriol (uE3), and hCG together with maternal age. - Nuchal Translucency Scan (NT scan) 11-136 weeks: measurement of the fold of skin on the back of the fetal neck (Nuchal Translucency) together with the maternal age. - Quadruple test 14-21 weeks: AFP, uE3, free β-hCG (or total hCG) and inhibin-A together with maternal age. - Combined test 10-136 weeks: NT measurement with free β-hCG, PAPP-A and maternal age. - Integrated test Integration of NT measurement and PAPP-A in the first trimester with serum AFP, β-hCG , uE3 and inhibin A in the second. In the SURUSS study, this was found to have the lowest number of unaffected foetuses lost, and the highest number of DS diagnoses per unaffected foetus lost. 22 MCD Genetics Alexandra Burke-Smith National Guidelines NICE- Antenatal Care Guideline April 2005 60% detection for 5% False positive April 2007 75% detection for <3% False positive At 1:250 risk cut-off at term April 2007 Integrated Test Combined Test Serum Integrated Test Invasive Prenatal Diagnosis Foetal MRA can be used to give more subtle images, with higher resolution, for example can be used to look at the brain to see the relative movement of white and grey matter. However invasive prenatal testing is used to sample the foetus, which can provide us with more molecular information. Chorionic villi and amniotic fluid can be used to look at the foetal karyotype, DNA analysis and biochemical analysis Amniocentesis • • • • • • • Performed >15 weeks Aseptic technique - gloves, no touch Continuous US guidance Avoid placenta 22G needle with stylet Discard first 2ml (so as to only obtain amniotic fluid with the foetal cells) Aspirate 15-20ml Complications Pregnancy loss rate: - 1% procedure-related miscarriage - Only 1 RCT (Tabor 1986), control 0.7% miscarriage, amnio 1.7% - Fetal Medicine Units 0.5% (1:200) - Rh sensitisation Three Rhesus Protein (Rh; C, D and E) Antigen on surface of red blood cells 15%of Caucasians are Rh D negative If the baby is Rh D positive, and the mother is Rh D negative, the maternal immune system will be exposed to the Rh D on the surface of the red blood cells The mother will then develop an immune response against the subsequent pregnancy, causing the baby’s immune system to break down the RBCs and become anaemic Analysis of Rh can be done by blood test, and all Rh Negative women get Anti D within 72h 1.3% procedure-related liquor leakage - Usually self limiting - Only small number miscarry Infection - <0.1% - if suspected do repeat amniocentesis, and perhaps suggest emptying uterus late diagnosis 23 MCD Genetics Alexandra Burke-Smith Early vs Midtrimester Amniocentesis • CEMAT Trial (Lancet, Vol 351, Jan 1998) • Early (11+0 - 12+6 weeks) • Midtrimester (15+0 - 16+6 weeks) • 4374 women - Post-procedure loss rate - 2.6% vs 0.8% - Talipes - 1.3% vs 0.1% - Culture failure - 1.7% vs 0.2% - Amniotic fluid leakage (<22 weeks) - 3.5% vs 1.7% Cytogenetic Analysis • Fetal cells concentrated in centrifuge (skin, pulmonary, urogenital, extra-embryonic membrane cells) • Cells cultured in multiple cultures (14 days) • Culture failure rate 0.5% (1:200) • Maternal contamination rare- as needs to pass through cells of mother before reaching amniotic fluid, therefore first 2mls are discarded before aspiration of 15-20mls) • Human error • Culture Artifact • Mosaicism (some normal cells, some abnormal) Mosaicism in Amnio Culture Finding of 2 or more cell lines with different chromosomal constitutions in amniocyte culture e.g. 46XX/47XX+21 Most often due to culture artefact, therefore has to be present in >2 cultures to be significant (<0.2%) As amniotic fluid culture based on various cell types taken from the body, mosaicism is most likely to represent a true mosaic (exactly which chromosomes are present) in foetus However, if fetus structurally normal then may need further confirmatory testing such as fetal blood sampling as may be confined to fetal membranes. Chorionic Villus Sampling (CVS) • • • • • • • • 11 weeks onwards Transabdominal (more common) or transcervical (presents higher risk of miscarriage)- USS guided Needle goes into placenta, and is moved back and forth to obtain culture. Short term culture gives count in 48 hours- allows for early detection Ideal for DNA analysis Tertiary referral unit Risk of miscarriage 0.5-2% More complicated technique than amniocentesis Complications Pregnancy loss rate: - 1% procedure-related miscarriage- not noticeably greater than amniocentesis - Background miscarriage rate higher 2% - Fetal Medicine Units 0.5% (1:200)- therefore should only be done in Fetal Medicine Units Rh sensitisation - All Rh Negative women get Anti D within 72h Bleeding/ ROM/ Infection rare - can get vaginal bleeding without miscarriage Fetal anomaly, e.g. Limb Defects - if <10 weeks, limb defects may occur as cells have not fully differentiated (2%) - 1:1692 background incidence of limb defects 24 MCD Genetics Alexandra Burke-Smith - 1:1878 incidence after CVS (>10/40) – therefore increase For more statistics on CVS vs Amniocentesis etc, look at powerpoint!! Cytogenetic analysis Direct culture exclusively from cytophoblasts/synctiotrophoblast in placenta possible in 72h Culture from primarily fibroblasts which are derived from inner cell mass and therefore more representative of fetus possible in 14 days 1:500 culture failure 1:200 Mosaicism - Usually confined placental mosaicism (<10% confirmed in fetus). Mutations can occur in placenta without occurring in baby. Therefore if CVS is positive, but baby looks structurally normal, we wait and use amniocentesis. 0.03% false negative Fetal Blood Sampling Transabdominal USS (ultrasound) guided- done using aseptic technique >18 weeks- can be done earlier, but very difficult due to small size of cells Asceptic conditions CVS and Amnio are preferred for karyotype as they are easier to do Primary use if for assessing fetal anaemia, and whether a blood transfusion is reuired Transplacental into umbilical cord insertion into placenta Or transamniotic into Intrahepatic Vein (within umbilical cord) Intrahepatic vs Cord insertion Rapid Cytogenetic Testing Rapid Karyotyping FISH: fluorescence in-situ hybridisation - used to detect and localize the presence or absence of specific DNA sequences on chromosomes - chromosome specific - fluorescence labelled - uses DNA probes which bind to the specific target sequences - Quantitative Fluorescent PCR Used to investigate extent of trisomy 21 Any sample can be used to look specifically at chromosome 21 25 MCD Genetics Alexandra Burke-Smith Elective Late Karyotyping Pros Avoids risk of miscarriage Allows antenatal diagnosis Allows TOP Cons Late termination of pregnancy (TOP) Low utility Iatrogenic prematurity (induced prematurity by physician) Fetal cells in Maternal Blood Free fetal DNA (ffDNA) is present in maternal circulation (5-10%) Ff mRNA specifically found in placenta, not in maternal blood This is cleaved from the circulation within two hours of delivery Difficult to extract pure ffDNA but can look for specific abnormalities Clinical use - fetal RhD genotyping - sex determination and X-linked diseases Management Options If the foetus is diagnosed as positive for Down syndrome, an explanation of the syndrome, as well as its specific effects on the baby need to be explained clearly to the parents. There are then different things to consider Termination of Pregnancy Continuation of pregnancy - Support Parents decision - Offer continued USS monitoring - Detailed plans need to be made for - Mode of Delivery - Monitoring in Labour - Neonatal resusitation - Postmortem - Postnatal care- surgical/cardiac/neurological etc Genetic Counselling - Risk of recurrence - Management of future pregnancy - Implications to other family members Abortion Act 1967: HFEA 1990 A The continuance of the pregnancy would involve risk to the life of the pregnant women greater than if the pregnancy were terminated B The termination is necessary to prevent permanent injury to the physical or mental health of women the pregnant 26 MCD Genetics Alexandra Burke-Smith C The pregnancy has NOT exceeded its 24th week and that the continuance of the pregnancy would involve risk, greater than if the pregnancy were terminated, of injury to the physical or mental health of the pregnant women D The pregnancy has NOT exceeded its 24th week and that the continuance of the pregnancy would involve risk, greater than if the pregnancy were terminated, of injury to the physical or mental health of any existing children of the family of the women E There is substantial risk that if the child were born it would suffer from physical or mental abnormalities as to be seriously handicapped Terminations 93% of abortions carried out under clause C & D <1% are performed > 24 weeks 96% of T21 and Spina bifida performed under clause E Clause E There is substantial risk that if the child were born it would suffer from physical or mental abnormalities as to be seriously handicapped This does not give a gestation limit. Most common use is that if there is a 30% chance of handicap this applies 27 MCD Genetics Alexandra Burke-Smith 6. Complex Genetic Diseases- Obesity Dr Alexandra Blakemore ([email protected]) Summary Common diseases may have a range of causes, some very strongly genetic Progress in genetics is very fast Genetic cause does not imply that there’s nothing that can be done Do not suspend evidence-based medicine because of stigmatisation of particular patients Introduction to genetics of obesity 1) Syndromic – part of a syndrome eg Prader-willi 2) Monogenic- “single-gene” 3) Common obesity- in the general population: cause unknown Fat Necessity Storage of food and water Insulation Support and protection of vital organs Source of hormones – regulator of reproduction Sexual signalling Regulator and fueller of the immune system Source of new immune cells Aids wound healing Not enough fat Infertility Miscarriage Death from infections Higher suicide rate Osteoporosis BMI (Body Mass Index) Ranges: Underweight, Healthy, Overweight, Obese, Clinically Obese (morbidity) No real indication of body composition Doesnt work for very small, or very tall people Ethnicity: Asians have a lower BMI but more body fat Body weight is affected by muscle/fat ratio Obesity Lack of physical activity + high density calorie diet + stress + genetic factors OBESITY Obesity defined as BMI ≥30 kg/m2 Morbid obesity BMI ≥40 kg/m2 Syndromic, monogenic and common forms In 2005, WHO projected >400 million obese individuals By 2030, will increase to >1.1 billion obese individuals Impact on global health; disease e.g. diabetes and costs Genetics affects individual responses to the obesogenic environment 28 MCD Genetics Alexandra Burke-Smith Heritability of obesity estimated at up to 0.77 from twin and family studies (Maes et al 1997, Wardle et al 2008) All monogenic forms of obesity known so far affect appetite regulation; to gain 1lb of fat requires about 3,500 excess calories How do we get fat? Behaviours feeding physical activity Physiology resting metabolism energy expenditure when active These are both affected/controlled by genes Heritability in Children 77% BMI 77% Waist circumference Identical twins (monozygotic) differences all environmental Non-identical twins (dizygotic) have both genetic and environmental differences Note: the estimated heritability of obesity is approx 30% genetic, and 40% resulting from inactivity, hyperphagia and unknown factors. 1. Syndromic Obesity around 30 known syndromic forms of obesity usually accompanied by mental retardation and particular dysmorphic or clinical features Prader-Wili syndrome is the most common – imprinting defect, paternal deletion or maternal isodisomy (i.e. paternal chromosome 15 not inherited) examination of the underlying mutations can help us to pinpoint previously unrecognised mechanisms of obesity also BDNF in WAGR syndrome :Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF- 11p14.1)has been found to be important in energy homeostasis, and its deletion results in a predisposition to childhood obesity. cilia in Bardet-Biedl syndrome: characterized principally by obesity, retinitis pigmentosa, polydactyly, mental retardation, hypogonadism, and renal failure in some cases. Caused by defects in cell ciliary structure. 2. Monogenic Obesity Dominant or recessive single gene disorders Defects in the leptin-melanocortin pathway, which operates in the brain (hypothalamus) to regulate eating behavior and energy expenditures Single gene defects found in 1 in 20 morbidly obese children Most common is MC4R deficiency: autosomal dominant (2-6%) Leptin: signal produced by fat cells, exported into bloodstream and then transported to the hypothalamus Overeating leads to severe obesity, fertility problems and immune Monogenic Leptin Deficiency: - Immune problems - Hunger - Obesity - no puberty - poor growth - low thyroid this is treated with leptin. However most fat people have lots of leptin- perhaps they just have a deficiency/loss of function in the leptin receptor in the hypothalamus 29 MCD Genetics Alexandra Burke-Smith the leptin-melanocortin ADIPOSTAT regulates body fat levels - OREXIGENIC: makes you eat - ANOREXIGENIC: stops you eating Pro-opiomelanocortin gene: roles in energy homeostasis, pain, melanocyte stimulation and immune modulation. Mutations lead to: - Hunger - Obesity - Red hair - Low adrenal activity PC1 (Prohormone convertase 1), LEP, LEPR, POMC are also single-gene recessive mutations which lead to obesity Most people have a mixture of monogenic, oligogenic (two or more), or polygenic mutations contributing 3. Common Obesity Obesity in the general population Genomic-wide association (GWA): “common disease, common variant”. 6 GWA studies carried out, looking at single nucleotide polymorphisms SNPs throughout the genome (comparing obese vs non-obese people) GWAS-identified SNPs explain only a small proportion of common obesity risk 32 confirmed BMI loci account for just 1.5% of inter-individual variation Most common marker is FTO- which accounts for a 3kg variation in weight even meta-analysis involving 0.5 million subjects will only explain 3% of variation in BMI Problems with GWAS: contribution to the genetic component of BMI is estimated to be low (<5%), so more work is needed Also, common variants of more subtle effects (e.g. FTO) is not relevant to sever forms of obesity Missing heritability? Rare variants Epigenetics Genetic Structural Variations (GSVs): - Missing pieces of the genome (deletions) - Extra copies of certain regions (duplications or amplifications) - Parts of the genome switched around (inversions or translocations) Ongoing Research Patients with syndromic forms of obesity have a larger number of GSVs Investigations of the large number of GSVs found in patients with “obesity-plus” phenotypes to identify new obesity loci Then investigate these loci in the general population to find rare variants Findings: Paper- “The Power of the extreme” Chromosome 16p11.2 deletion estimated to be 546-700kb Probably arises by Non-allelic homologous recombination, implying a size of 739kb Using DNA hybridisation, can use markers to compare relative amounts of DNA (normal vs DNA containing deletion) Multiple reports of 16p11.2 deletions and duplications in patients with neurocognitive phenotypes: autism (0.58%), developmental delay, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder Deletion more common in obesity (2.9%) Results in the addition of at least 5 BMI points, and is found in 1% of morbidly obese population PHENOTYPE: - BMI = 29.2 kg.m-2 at age 7½ (>97th centile) - Moderately-severe mental retardation and poor speech 30 MCD Genetics Alexandra Burke-Smith - Dysmorphic features e.g. Congenital nystagmus, squint, hypertelorism, downslanting palpebral fissures, large protruding ears and bilateral 2+3 toe syndactyly - Coarse hair with a double crown on his scalp Obesity phenotype is age-dependent: - Adult relatives of probands who also carry the deletion are universally obese - In carriers of the deletion, the age of onset of obesity appears to be approx. 8-10 years - In our cohorts, the deletion accounts for: 0.9% of adult morbid obesity 0.4% of child morbid obesity - 10/25 deletions appear to have arisen de novo(new mutations) For more information from the study- look at slideshow The deletion includes multiple genes that may be candidates for obesity causes the first CNV (copy number variation) directly associated with obesity Highly penetrant mendelian form of obesity (1 in 20 morbidly obese): i.e. if you have deletion you will get fat RECIPROCAL PHENOTYPE: Duplications reported to be associated with schizophrenia, bipolar disease and microcephaly Investigated BMI of 105 duplication carriers, BMI was shifted towards underweight (p=0.04), especially among adult females (p=0.003) (but not many adult males found) SUMMARY Convincing obesity association for deletions of the ~700kb 16p11 ‘autism’ locus - onset of obesity at 8-10 years of age - explains ~1% of adult morbid obesity in the general population - duplication carriers may be more likely to be underweight Strong association with child obesity of nearby 220kb deletion encompassing SH2B1 - explains >0.5% of child morbid obesity cases - impact on adult obesity is less clear - not more insulin resistant than others of similar BMI Note: Investigation of GSVs in cohorts with “obesity-plus” is a promising route to the identification of novel obesity loci Personalised medicine in obesity Around 1:20 morbidly obese patients has a highly-penetrant Mendelian form of obesity Obese patients are rarely offered screening or genetic counselling (eg. for obesity or autism risk) Immediate implications for personalised medicine: 1) Choice of medications that might cause weight gain (especially where there is neurocognitive dysfunction) 2) New drug development (MC4R) 3) Potential for intensive lifelong preventative intervention, e.g. if intervention occurs in childhood, can prevent adult obesity 4) Choice of obesity surgery type Effect of MC4R genotype on outcome of obesity surgery After 6 years, 16.7% of patients carrying loss-of-function mutations had BMI<30 kg/m2, compared to 42.4% of subjects with the same initial BMI Carriers of loss-of-function or gain-of-function mutations also had higher reoperation rates 31 MCD Genetics Alexandra Burke-Smith The future of complex diseases Whole genome sequencing • Millions more SNPs • Difficult statistical challenges, improvements on use of BMI Advanced Phenotyping • Ultrasound • Photonic scanning • Air displacement plethysmography (BodPod) • CAT/MRI 32 MCD Genetics Alexandra Burke-Smith 7. The future of Genomic Medicine Dr Jess Buxton ([email protected]) Summary Summary PGD likely to remain an important reproductive option for a small number of families affected by serious genetic disease Pharmacogenetics and identification of disease ‘sub-types’ should reduce side effects and increase efficacy of treatments Some companies are already offering genetic tests direct to consumers that have limited clinical utility at present Technological advances may one day mean that everyone’s genome is sequenced as part of routine healthcare Personalised medicine based on genetic information raises concerns over privacy, autonomy and equality of access, but also has the potential to transform healthcare Outline the following: 1. Embryo testing - Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) - Uses and limitations - Ethical issues 2. - Advances in genomic medicine Pharmacogenetics ‘Next generation’ DNA sequencing Finding the causes of monogenic disease 3. - Personalised healthcare Direct-to-consumer genetic testing The personal genome project Ethical issues Future perspectives Embryo Testing Pre-implantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD) PGD: a genetic test carried out on IVF embryos, usually to ensure that only embryos free from a particular genetic condition are returned to the woman's womb option for some families at risk of having a child affected by a serious genetic condition offered as an alternative to prenatal testing licensed in the UK on a case by case basis, for each new genetic condition that is tested licensing is required Apr 1990- female embryos chosen to avoid X-linked diseases, adrenoleukodystrophy and X-linked mental retardation Aug 2000- first “saviour sibling”- HLA tissue typing for treatment of existing child Dec 2009- 581 studied babies, conclusion that PGD has no effect on pregnancy outcome up to age of two months Over 1000 babies born after PGD worldwide (compared to over 4 million IVF babies), as limited applications Most common method is blastomere biopsy 1. IVF: 33 MCD Genetics Alexandra Burke-Smith collection of egg and sperm, growing of embryo for 3 days to form blastomere (8 identical totipotent cells) removal of one or two cells for investigation 2. Test DNA/Chromosomes: FISH: detects chromosomal conditions, e.g. Down’s syndrome PCR and DNA sequencing: to detect single-gene mutations 3. Test Results disorder excluded implantation Disorder detected embryo discarded Ethical issues involves discarding unused embryos – this may cause controversy with respect to belief that “life begins at conception” Disability arguments- testing makes judgement on people already living with disability, i.e. their lives are not worth living etc ‘Slippery slope’ – designer babies? Eugenics When is PGD permitted in the UK? Severe early onset genetic disease, eg. Tay Sachs Severe late onset conditions, eg. Huntington disease Disease with incomplete penetrance, eg. hereditary breast cancer (BRCA1/2 mutations) To choose a tissue-matched baby for a sick sibling Sex selection: not for preference, but in cases of sever X-linked disorders. However sex selection is permitted in Spain, US PGD for hereditary breast cancer BRCA1 mutation carriers have up to an 80% lifetime risk of developing breast/ovarian cancer, often at a young age <40 Birth of baby born following PGD to select embryos free from BRCA1 mutation reignited controversy over ‘designer’ babies last year even though baby’s father’s mum, aunt, sister and grandmother had all been affected. Saviour Siblings PGD can be used to select an embryo that is both free from disease HLA tissue-matched for a sibling affected by a disease that may be treatable using stem cells from umbilical cord blood, e.g. baby Adam Nash Nash case sparked concerns over ‘commodification’ of children into ‘commercial goods’, e.g. “My sister’s Keeper” etc Advances in Genomic Medicine Pharmacogenetics Studying the genetic basis for the difference between individuals in response to drugs: “right drug, right dose, right patient” People react differently to different medications as a result of variation in metabolism as a result of genetics Getting the DOSE right E.g. Variants in TPMT (thiopurine methyltransferase) gene affect metabolism of 6-mercaptopurine (used to treat leukaemia) - Most people metabolize the drug quickly, so doses need to be high enough to treat leukaemia and prevent relapses - others metabolize the drug slowly and need lower doses to avoid toxic side effects - a small proportion of people metabolize the drug so poorly that its effects can be fatal 34 MCD Genetics Alexandra Burke-Smith - after a simple blood test, individuals can be given doses of medications that are tailored to their genetic profile Getting the DRUG right e.g. type 1 diabetes can be misdiagnosed as Maturity onset diabetes of the young (MODY) Type 1 Diabetes MODY Usually childhood onset Usually childhood onset Autoimmune disease Monogenic disease Must be treated with daily insulin injections Some types can be treated with oral sulfonylurea drugs Advances in DNA Sequencing ‘Next-generation’ sequencing already used to identify novel gene mutations in monogenic disease Whole exome sequencing (WES) – ie. just protein-coding genes Mutated genes involved in Miller syndrome and Schinzel-Giedion syndrome identified in 2010 In both cases, whole-exome sequencing (WES) carried out on just 4 affected individuals Miller Syndrome - Caused by mutations in DHODH gene - Multiple malformation syndrome - Characteristic facial features, including ‘cupped’ ears - Absent toes Schinzel-Giedion Syndrome - Caused by mutations in SETBP1 gene - Severe mental retardation - Multiple congenital abnormalities - Characteristic facial features - Life-limiting Neonatal Diabetes - Mutation in ABCC8 gene identified- known MODY/PNDM gene – mutation had been missed previously using old DNA sequencing techniques - Single patient with permanent neonatal diabetes investigated using whole exome sequencing - Patients with this type of diabetes can be treated with oral sullfonylurea drugs, rather than insulin injections Personal Healthcare Direct to consumer (DTC) genetic tests - DTC genetic tests look at particular genetic variance within disease - Bypasses the doctor-patient relationship Monogenic Disease Complex Disease Can provide carrier status information about Often have limited clinical utility recessive diseases e.g. Tay sachs, cystic fibrosis Can detect rare serious conditions in newborn, e.g. MCAD deficiency May cause undue alarm To determine risk of later onset disease, eg. hereditary breast cancer May offer false reassurance Essential that service includes genetic counselling Data privacy concerns Medium chain acyl CoA dehydrogenase (MCAD) deficiency is an autosomal recessive disorder of beta-oxidation of fatty acids, which occurs in approximately 1 in 20,000 live births. MCADD generally presents clinically between the second month and second year of life – can be fatal if undiagnosed, as body cannot combat hypoglycaemia by producing glucose via fatty acid metabolism 35 MCD Genetics Alexandra Burke-Smith DTC for common diseases- Type 2 diabetes currently affects 285 million adults worldwide, predicted to rise to 439 million by 2030 due to rise in obesity Caused by complex interaction of non-genetic (eg diet) and genetic factors Biggest factor is waist circumference 38 confirmed T2D genes so far, which explain just ~10% of estimated genetic contribution Strongest associations are with variants in the TCF7L2 gene , but this is only 1/32 genes False reassurance- people who have no copies of the risk variant but will still develop the disease CONCERNS False alarm- people who have at least one copy of the risk variant but will never develop the disease Tests of dubious clinical benefit may be offered Data protection (especially if company ceases trading) BENEFITS the results of the tests may lead people to make better “lifestyle choices”, which could reduce the risk of T2D Whole Genome Sequencing Individual genetic tests for variants associated with Monogenic disease, drug response, disease “sub-type” and future risk may be replaced by whole genome sequencing All variants (common and rare)will then all be identified in one analysis COST Entire human genome is made up of 2.9 billion base-pairs of DNA First human genome cost $3 billion to sequence, now around $10,000 PERSONAL GENOME PROJECT (PGP) volunteered to share their DNA sequences, medical records, and other personal information with the research community and the general public project that aims to bring personal genomics into mainstream medicine The Future: Genetic Profiling? HGC: Human Genetic Council Conclusions and Recommendations: genetic profiling is feasible and likely to become available commercially in less than 20 years before the offer of universal genetic profiling could be considered at a population level, steps would need to be taken to preclude any misuse of information derived from it genetic profiling is unlikely to be publicly affordable within 20 years for newborn genetic profiling, issues of consent and the welfare of the child are problematic genetic profiling may in the future have clinical potential but its effectiveness cannot yet be judged there is a pressing need to develop a programme of research to define the full costs and potential benefits of genetic profiling for the health of children and adults Genetic profiling cannot be applied as an NHS screening programme in the near future. The topic should be kept under review and be revisited in five years Ethical Issues Commercial genetic testing for disease risk Equality of access to genetic information Right ‘not to know’ (particularly children) Protection of data, right to ‘genetic privacy’ 36
© Copyright 2024