Making inroads in math teaching and learning Marian Small April, 2015 Our Ministry and boards • have paid a great deal of attention to math, particularly how it should be taught. Step 1 • It’s obvious that Step 1 is creating the right classroom culture. • None of what I say later can work without this, but I will say this is only the start. But • we also need to attend to what is being taught. • It’s not just about the expectations, but what we do with the expectations. How do we read them? • So many expectations can be read with different perspectives– a “do it” perspective or an “understand important ideas about it” perspective. For example • Grade 4: – add and subtract decimal numbers to tenths, using concrete materials and student-generated algorithms View 1 • Make sure they can add and subtract and give them some concrete experiences and some chance to invent their own procedures. View 2 • Help them see how adding and subtracting tenths really is adding and subtracting whole numbers of tenths and … View 2 • …that adding and subtracting tenths apply to the same types of situations as adding and subtracting wholes. Or Grade 9 • express the equation of a line in the form y = mx + b, given the form Ax + By + C = 0. View 1 • Do the algebra to move from one form of a line to the other View 2 • Recognize that any algebraic relationship (including the equation of a line) can be described different ways and be aware of when each way is more useful and why It makes a difference! • View 1 teachers bring out very different highlights in a lesson than View 2 teachers. • Which teacher do you want? I know what I want, but I’m not sure teachers all see the difference. So • The classrooms of both teachers could look like “problem solving” classes but the walk-aways are very different for the students in those classes. It’s about a view of math • Is math about solving problems? Or • Is math about having a deep understanding of a variety of mathematical relationships? Teachers are working to .. • use rich tasks. • But do they know what makes it rich? Is a task rich because • there is a context? • (I don’t think so.) • because it is open-ended? • (I don’t think so.) Is it rich because • there are many strategies? • Many strategies is probably a component. • But is there a mathematical purpose beyond solving it? • Is there such a thing as a rich task or does it depend what the teacher does with it? • Can you tell if it’s a rich task if you don’t know the math deeply? • Should a rich task usually take 40 minutes or so? • I’m not convinced it has to or needs to or regularly should. What would you think of this task? • We were addressing the sorting of quadrilaterals. • We had talked to kids about various properties of quadrilaterals in an earlier lesson. Our activation • Use one phrase to describe one of the triangles that will make it easy for us to guess which one you meant. Our main lesson Choose three of these phrases: • Some, but not all, equal side lengths • Some parallel sides • Symmetry • Right angles • Equal diagonals • 4 equal side lengths • a very small angle • an angle bigger than a right angle Then • Build a quadrilateral with your three properties. • Choose three different ones and go again. • Keep going until you run out of ideas or time. For example • Some parallel sides • Symmetry • Right angles For example • a very small angle • an angle bigger than a right angle • symmetry Consolidation • We would look at a quad and guess which three properties kids picked • (We were sometimes right and sometimes wrong even though we saw the three properties we did.) Consolidation Then we asked things like: • What properties would a square and rectangle both have? • A kite and parallelogram? Etc. Consolidation • What properties were easy to put together? • What properties were hard to put together? Consolidation • What properties did most quads have? • What properties were less usual? What should be the focus of consolidation? • Clearly, it relates to learning goals. • But what are appropriate learning goals? Consolidation • They can’t be restatements of expectations. • They can’t just be “topics”. • They need to be ideas. For example • In a lesson on adding fractions, my goal might be how adding and subtracting fractions is like adding and subtracting whole numbers and why. Consolidation • Does it have to involve whole group sharing? • Is its function mostly about the sharing? Consolidation • Can you plan what to focus consolidation on before you see what the kids so? You have read or will read.. • a piece talking about 5 productive dispositions for orchestrating good math conversation. The last one… • speaks to connecting responses. • I fully agree, but is it responses to the problem or is it responses to the ideas you chose the problem to bring out? Role of teacher beliefs • We have already discussed this a little, but there’s more. Many teachers… • really don’t have much faith in their students and seek to give them “simpler” problems. • Is this the way to go? • Let me tell you a story…. Myth/Attitude Barriers • Pictures, numbers AND words • Everything can and should be levelled . Myth/Attitude Barriers • A focus on solutions, instead of thinking. • A focus on format/vocabulary in communication. Myth/Attitude Barriers • The purpose of consolidation • The belief that you need the basics first before you can attack a problem Myth/Attitude Barriers • The belief that focusing on templates and format will solve problems. • A view of co-planning/co-teaching or PL events as events. Suggestions Where I see the greatest need for teachers: • Unpacking expectations, ideally through a revised curriculum document, but, if not, through collegial discussion Suggestions • Looking at consolidation in a different way than they are; not just about sharing strategies Suggestions • Looking at consolidation in a different way than they are; not just about sharing strategies Suggestions • Recognizing the critical role of questioning and developing skills to become better questioners • Content embedded within the ideas above Suggestions Where I see the greatest need for boards and the Ministry: • Putting a greater expectation on principals as instructional leaders (not just in name only but for real), possibly by being somewhat less demanding in other areas or allowing others to oversee some other areas Suggestions • Teaching principals, SOs and coaches to focus on deep, not surface, issues • Focusing less on “structure” and more on “substance”
© Copyright 2024