The Vela Supercluster:

The Vela Supercluster:
showcasing the need
for deep “whole-sky” HI-surveys
Renée C. Kraan-Korteweg
ACGC (Astrophysics, Cosmology and Gravity Centre), UCT
Michelle Cluver, Tom Jarrett, Maciej Bilicki, Matthew Colless, Ahmed Elagali
& Ed Elson
Ø  Discovery of major supercluster hidden by ZOA
Ø  Implications
Ø  Whole sky-surveys and the ZOA
Ø  A Vela SCL MeerKAT survey scenario (with Ed Elson)
8th PHISCC meeting
Rutgers, March 2015
Suspicion of existence of massive overdensity in ZOA
just beyond boundaries of current surveys 16-22000km/s
Follow-up redshift
observations of optically
detected galaxies in ZOA in
Vela (KK et al)
With 6dF instrument
à SALT & AAOmega proposals to consolidate & map extent of
overdensity (with M Cluver, T Jarrett, M Bilicki, M Colless)
à SALT & AAOmega observations of optically and 2M galaxies
to map extent of overdensity (l,b) = 240° – 290°; ± (4°-10°)
SALT 10m & RSS:
8’ field: N~25
2012-2103:
à  About a dozen fields of prospective
cluster cores
à  Most confirmed as clusters at Vela
overdensity distance
AT 4m & AAOmega:
2° field; N ~400
2014: 6 nights in February:
à  4300 redshifts in 25 AAOmega fields:
overdensity extends over vast region
Preliminary results from 1 - 6 Feb 2014 AAOmega Observing run:
25 x 2-deg fields observed à N ~ 4300 redshifts
Massive overdensity: traced over ~ 20 o/o 25 observed fields
-  Velocity histogram shows highly
significant peak
centred at ~18000km/s
-  just beyond boundaries of
current surveys 16-22000km/s
-  Overdensity equally prominent
above an below optical ZOA
-  Numerous clusters at
18-20000km/s
-  Embedded in broader wall-like
structure (16-24000km/s)
Preliminary results from 1 - 6 Feb 2014 AAOmega Observing run:
25 x 2-deg fields observed à N ~ 4300 redshifts
Massive overdensity: traced over ~ 20 o/o 25 observed fields
-  Velocity histogram shows highly
significant peak
centred at ~18000km/s
-  just beyond boundaries of
current surveys 16-22000km/s
-  Overdensity equally prominent
above an below optical ZOA
-  Numerous clusters at
18-20000km/s
-  Embedded in broader wall-like
structure (16-24000km/s)
Preliminary results from 1 - 6 Feb 2014 AAOmega Observing run:
25 x 2-deg fields observed à N ~ 4300 redshifts
Numerous clusters at 18-20000km/s
Clusters embedded in great wall:
à 13 massive clusters; 19 medium clusters/massive groups @ Vela z
Embedded in broader wall-like structure (16-24000km/s)
Redshift coding:
0 – 10000 km/s;
10-16000 km/s;
16-24000 km/s;
24-50000 km/s (black)
Massive overdensity
traced over
(Δl, Δb) ~ 20° x 20°
Assume continuity
Mass
At 18-22000 km/s
à70 x 70 Mpc/h
Where extinction reaches ~AB = 2mag à hard to get redshifts, even for 2MASX galaxies
à Area of ~|b| < ±5-7° unsampled
Preliminary results from 1 - 6 Feb 2014 AAOmega Observing run:
25 x 2-deg fields observed à N ~ 4300 redshifts
Comparison to Shapley Supercluster Concentration
-  Massive overdensity traced over
(Δl, Δb) >~ 20° x 20°
-  Is on par with Shapley SSC
(Proust et al 2006, N ~ 8600);
[also Horologium/Reticulum SCL
(Fleenor et al 2006)]
-  Despite f ~ 1.3 more distant
à more extended on the sky:
12° x 30° ßà ~ 20° x 20°
30 x 75 ßà 70 x 70 Mpc/h
-  Munoz & Loeb 2008:
Based on X-ray of clusters in sky:
SSC exerts about
9% acceleration on LG
-  ADD Vela SCL à
Although very
sparse data at
higher
redshifts,
strong flow
lines
downwards
from Shapley,
then bending
to left
Lepus????
Vela SCL
Tully et al 2014,
Nature, Laniakea
What does it all signify?
● 
● 
● 
● 
● 
Clear evidence for massive SCL in Vela;
Vela SCL likely on par with SSC
Forms Big Circle of SCL’s across the sky:
Vela SCL à Shapley SCL à Ara/Triangulum?
It’s impact on bulk flow is significant?
–  But difficult to assess properly with sparse sampling
If it extends across the ZOA it will be even more
massive
How much remains hidden behind ZOA?
Does the Milky Way hide further surprises?
Only the forthcoming whole-sky HI-surveys
WALLABY & WNSHS will provide full census
MeerKAT Commissioning survey scenario
à with Ed Elson
Ø  “only” 25 AAOmega fields, with some other ZOA data à sparsely sampled
Ø  AB = 2mag à hard to get optical redshifts àArea of ~|b| < ±5-7° unsampled
15
0 – 10000; 10-16000; 16-2400; black: 24-50000
10
5
Survey area of about
(l x b) = 20° x 12.5°
0
To trace Vela SCL across ZOA
-5
-10
Goal:
Map all galaxies MHI > 9.5 M¤with 16-24000km/s
-15
285
280
275
270
265
Galactic longitude
260
255
250
245
MeerKAT Commissioning survey scenario
à with Ed Elson
Updated MeerKAT Specifications:
Tsys = 22.4 K; Ae/Tsys ~ 430m2/K; SS = 7.3 x JVLA
Simulations based on :
Survey input parameters:
-  Duffy et al 2012 simulations of
stellar and HI-content of galaxies
(Wallaby & Dingo)
-  of 4 million galaxies
-  within z < 0.44
-  over FOV of 50 ☐°
- channel width Δv = 10 km/s
- Baseline 8km (à 15” resolution)
-  5σ detection limit
s
=
à  rms = 3.86 mJy
à  0.5 hr
2kTsys
Ae ⌘( t ⌫)1/2
Actual measurement on M63
Justin Jonas (March 2015)
MeerKAT Commissioning survey scenario
à with Ed Elson
Updated MeerKAT Specifications:
Tsys = 22.4 K; Ae/Tsys ~ 430m2/K; SS = 7.3 x JVLA
Simulations based on :
Survey input parameters:
-  Duffy et al 2012 simulations of
stellar and HI-content of galaxies
(ASKAP: Wallaby & Dingo)
-  of 4 million galaxies
-  within z < 0.44
-  over FOV of 50 ☐°
- channel width Δv = 10 km/s
- Baseline 8km (à 15” resolution)
-  5σ detection limit:
s
=
à  rms = 3.86 mJy
à  0.5 hr
- FOV: 0.85☐° per pointing
2kTsys
Ae ⌘( t ⌫)1/2
Results: Predictions for MeerKAT survey scenario
à with Ed Elson
For Vhel < 24000 km/s:
All
18360
> 5-σ
2586
lg MHI > 9.5
577
For 16000 < Vhel < 24000 km/s:
All
8681
> 5-σ
527
lg MHI > 9.5
247
MeerKAT FOV: 0.85 ☐° à to reach goal 250☐° à 106 hrs with M64
à 424 hrs with M32
Results: Predictions for MeerKAT survey scenario
à with Ed Elson
For Vhel < 24000 km/s:
All
> 5-σ
lg MHI > 9.5
18360
91800
2586
12930
577
2885
For 16000 < Vhel < 24000 km/s:
All
> 5-σ
lg MHI > 9.5
8681
43405
527
2635
247
1235
MeerKAT FOV: 0.85 ☐° à to reach goal 250☐° à 106 hrs with M64
à 424 hrs with M32
Conclusions
● 
The case of the Vela SCL … and other new structures…
showcase the importance of the forthcoming
à “whole-sky” HI survey Wallaby & WNHSH (shallow)
with ASKAP & AperTIF
● 
Deeper whole-sky surveys including ZOA are key
in resolving the controversies around bulkflows
§ 
- what is amplitude of Bulk Flows on largest scales?
- what is their convergence radius? compatible with
LCDM?
MeerKAT in commissioning time can fill the ZOA gap
the bisects the Vela SCL in reasonable time
§ 
● 
M64 à 106 hrs; M32 à 424 hrs