RAPPAHANNOCK REGIONAL SOLID WASTE
MANAGEMENT BOARD
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA
STAFFORD COUNTY
GEORGE L. GORDON GOVERNMENT CENTER
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS CHAMBERS
STAFFORD, VIRGINIA
May 20, 2015
1:30 P.M.
A.
CALL TO ORDER.
B.
ROLL CALL TO DETERMINE QUORUM
C.
APPROVE MINUTES OF PRIOR BOARD MEETINGS (Tab 1)
April 15, 2015
D.
PRESENTATIONS BY THE PUBLIC
E.
PRESENTATIONS BY R-BOARD MEMBERS
F.
REPORT OF R-BOARD ATTORNEY
G.
REPORT OF STAFF (Tab 2)
1. Financial Summary Through March 31, 2015
2. Weight & Material Analysis Through March 31, 2015
3. Resident Fee Update
H.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS (Tab 3)
1. Proposed FY2016 Budget
I.
CLOSED SESSION
L.
NEXT SCHEDULED MEETING
June 17, 2015, Board of Supervisors Chambers, George L. Gordon Government Center, 1:30 PM
M.
ADJOURNMENT
MINUTES
RAPPAHANNOCK REGIONAL SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT BOARD
April 15, 2015 1:30 P.M.
George L. Gordon Government Center
Board of Supervisors Chambers
Meeting Convened: A regular meeting of the Rappahannock Regional Solid Waste Management Board (RBoard) was convened at 1:30 P.M. on Wednesday April 15, 2015, at the Stafford County Administration Center,
Board of Supervisors Chambers.
Roll Call: The following members were present: Matthew Kelly, Chairman; Paul V. Milde, III, Vice-Chairman;
Beverly R. Cameron; Gary Snellings; Anthony J. Romanello; William C. Withers, Jr.
Also in attendance were: Bill Hefty, Esq., R-Board Attorney; Robert L. Hundley, Resource International, Ltd.,
Consulting Engineer; Keith C. Dayton, Director & Deputy County Administrator; Jason Pauley, R-Board
Superintendent; Diane Jones, Julie Williams-Daves, R-Board staff;
Mr. Snellings motioned, seconded by Mr. Withers, to approve the minutes for March 12, 2015.
By voice, the vote was:
Yea:
(6)
Nay:
(0)
Absent:
(0)
Kelly, Milde, Cameron, Snellings, Romanello, Withers
Presentations by the Public: The following members of the public desired to speak:
Wendy Zernick: Ms. Zernick stated that she owns a small landscaping business and uses a 5 X 10 foot trailer
that holds less than ½ ton. She provided the Board with a handout which gave her background, problems with
landfill fees and suggested solution. Her proposed solution suggested that the Board consider selling a
different color sticker for landscape contractors for their plant waste.
Ruth Carlone: Ms. Carlone is concerned that the Board was considering incinerators for burning tires at the
landfill. She felt that this would create emissions of toxic nature. She noted that several schools as well as a
hospital were located in the vicinity.
Linda Muller: Ms. Muller wanted to comment on landfill usage. She felt there had been vast improvements to
the Eskimo Hill residential site services. She noted that the first couple of weeks that the user fee was put into
place it was chaotic, but felt the sticker system was working well. She found that she was entering and exiting
with ease in recent weeks. She also noted the importance of recycling. She noted that from a budget
perspective, recycling costs were lower than revenues. She would like to see issuing of the annual pass be
improved. She commented on pyrolysis. She noted that the EPA and DEQ both consider the process
incineration. She felt it was an inefficient alternative with the large capital investment needed.
R-Board Meeting Minutes
April 15, 2015 Meeting
Page 2
Presentations by the R-Board Members
Mr. Kelly noted that the Board was exploring all options available for the handling of our waste in the future.
He also noted that the Board considers and appreciates public input and comments. He felt the Board needed
to look at all sides of the issue.
Report of the R-Board Attorney: Mr. Bill Hefty reported that there were no issues regarding landfills
forthcoming in the current Virginia Legislative session.
Report of Staff: Mr. Dayton, Director & Deputy County Administrator, reported on the staffing levels for the RBoard. The R-Board is authorized for 34 employees, but budgeted at 29. At present we are at 26 with
recruitment under way for 3 maintenance workers.
Julie Williams-Daves gave the environmental compliance report. DEQ conducted their first quarter of 2015
waste compliance inspection on February 11th, and found the Regional Landfill to be in compliance. The RBoard remains on track to meet regulatory requirements for corrective action with respect to the groundwater
exceedance near Area #74. Additional sampling will confirm whether more treatment must be included in
next year’s budget. Staff continues to measure and report weekly readings to VA DEQ for GP-7 and GP-8.
Readings indicate methane levels are decreasing after installation of vent trench and clearing condensation
blockage. On April 1st the R-Board submitted our request to maintain the E3 certification, which was approved
by DEQ.
Robert Hundley added that additional plans have been made to connect GP-7 and adjacent probes to the
active extraction system if the above compliance readings persist. Resource continues to perform weekly
samplings at the Fredericksburg landfill due to above compliance readings around the Chaplin Youth Center.
Efforts to improve the LFG extraction system appears to be having the desired effect with sampling results
improving. Mr. Romanello requested Resource to contact the Chaplin Youth Center regarding this matter. Mr.
Hundley replied that he will do so.
Jason Pauley noted that the compactors have been received. The site preparations are waiting on Dominion
Power upgrades before they can be installed. The filling status of Cell F1 indicates that 72% of the space has
been utilized as of March 31st. Based on current disposal rates, the remaining airspace will be consumed by the
end of 2015. A survey is being scheduled for early next fiscal year to look at remaining solid waste disposal
capacity.
Diane Jones reported that the R-Board will be hosting its bi-annual Household Hazardous Waste Day on
Saturday May 30th at the Eskimo Hill drop-off site. It will run from 9:00 A.M. to 3:00 P.M. Mr. Snellings asked if
the event was still free for residents. Ms. Jones said yes. Mr. Snellings asked that staff make sure to get the
word out regarding this. He is concerned that participation may drop if residents assume they must pay a user
fee. Ms. Jones also noted that R-Board staff has scheduled the second annual customer use survey at the
Belman Road and Eskimo Hill resident convenience centers for Saturday, May 2nd thru Friday, May 8th. The
results will be reported at an upcoming meeting.
Closed Session: The R-Board went into closed session at 1:49 P.M. and reconvened the open session at 2:45
P.M.
R-Board Meeting Minutes
April 15, 2015 Meeting
Page 3
Mr. Snellings motioned, seconded by Mr. Withers, for the R-board to go into closed session to discuss
confidential matters of a legal nature.
By voice, the vote was:
Yea:
(6)
Kelly, Milde, Cameron, Snellings, Romanello, Withers
Nay:
(0)
Absent:
(0)
Mr. Withers motioned, seconded by Mr. Milde, to certify that only matters discussed during the closed session
were those related to the stated reason for the closed session, and to reconvene the open session of the RBoard meeting at 2:45 P.M.
By voice, the vote was:
Yea:
(6)
Nay:
(0)
Absent:
(0)
Kelly, Milde, Cameron, Snellings, Romanello, Withers
Mr. Kelly directed staff to report back to the R-Board at their next regular meeting on instituting flow control,
that is, requiring that all trash generated within the R-Board’s jurisdiction be required to come to the landfill in
part to cover capital costs.
Report on Finances: Mr. Dayton reported on the following: revenue trends are the same. Commercial hauler
revenue continues its slower pace. Recycling revenue has been good. Regarding other revenues streams, we
appear on target, except in municipal where as we did not receive the money from Stafford County. We are
aggressively controlling expenditures. We have seen an uptick in costs for some areas as we implement the
user fee program. Our waste quantities continue to decline from commercial hauler residential and
commercial customer sources. County Waste did bring more this month due to the re-flooring of their transfer
station. He pointed out that nearly all the waste categories have been moved to the billable column following
implementation of the residential user fee program. The litter control program and our cleanup support are
the only remaining non-billable categories. There has been a sharp decline in usage at the Belman Road
convenience center. A comparison between March of 2014 and 2015 showed a 46% drop in weights. He
attributed this to the user fee program which appears to have discouraged non-resident use and deterred
commercial customer abuse. Over all waste amounts are up 1%, primarily due to dirt quantities. It is used
beneficially for end of day capping activities; however it is not a significant revenue generator. Staff will look at
pricing to determine if we are offsetting operations costs.
Resident Fee Program Update: Mr. Dayton provided the following: As of March 31st the program had netted
$250,000. At this time, it stands at $300,000. Early projections indicate this revenue source could generate up
to $500,000 by December 31st. We will be prorating revenue from annual passes between FY15 and FY16.
Revenue from daily passes and coupon books will be booked in the year sold. The majority of annual pass and
coupon book sales, 42%, have been purchased at the landfill scalehouse. 100% of the daily pass sales are also
sold there. We expected to see a greater distribution of sales among the other locations where passes and
coupon books are sold. Logistically, sales at the scales are a problem due to the intermingling of residential
traffic with commercial traffic. The annual pass and coupon book holders flow through the residential side in
about the same time as prior to the program. Staff believes that a move of all transactions to residential side is
desirable, and has begun investigating the necessary measures to implement this change. Our information
technology staff has assessed and identified networking and computer deficiencies. We are also investigating
R-Board Meeting Minutes
April 15, 2015 Meeting
Page 4
a structure and location to shift this function to the residential side, possibly by the end of this year. Lastly, Mr.
Dayton noted that there have been no new illegal dumping reports since the Board met in April.
Mr. Milde asked if we would be able to accept credit cards in the future. Mr. Dayton said we are hoping to
implement this option by the end of year along with the other changes. We will need technology upgrades in
our computer system as discussed previously.
Unfinished Business
Supplemental Information request at March 12, 2015 Meeting: R-Board members made several requests for
additional information at their March 12th meeting. Mr. Dayton directed the Board to the table in the staff
report which depicts the major cost centers and estimated costs of these programs. Calculations include
personnel, operations, and maintenance costs, with administrative charges prorated across each item.
Depreciation is not included in any category. The cost of landfilling waste from either convenience center is not
included with that calculation. Approximately 1/3 of total R-board costs are not directly related to landfill
activities. The programs identified included Belman Road and Eskimo Hill convenience centers, recycling, public
outreach, regulatory compliance, litter crew, household hazardous waste, and mulching operations.
Mr. Dayton suggested that if the Board wants to modify charges for vegetative wastes from landscape
companies, to treat these wastes as a commercial fee as it is really not a residential charge. Staff does not
recommend another sticker color, due to the logistics involved in ordering, selling and monitoring another
decal for very few customers. The minimum fee threshold could be adjusted and continue handling the waste
through commercial side if the R-Board felt that relief was desirable. He noted that the services of the Stafford
and Fredericksburg Treasurer’s Offices have been stressed due to the user fee program, and keeping our
options to a minimum will aid them in providing service to us.
Staff assessed issuing of residential passes to commercial customers who have their vehicles under their
business name. To date there has been one request. Staff recommends that the Board pass each request
individually as an exception. This would mean that the Board could make a motion on each request. The
individual would then come to the R-Board office where we have the record of the R-Board action and we
would process the pass. Staff believes this is the simplest method for handling such requests.
Mr. Withers motioned, seconded by Mr. Milde, to implement a policy for issuing residential passes to
commercial customers who register their standard vehicles under their business by exception on an individual
basis through R-Board action. Individuals receiving an annual pass under this policy can only deliver residential
solid waste to the convenience centers in a vehicle with no business type signage.
By voice, the vote was:
Yea:
(6)
Nay:
(0)
Absent:
(0)
Kelly, Milde, Cameron, Snellings, Romanello, Withers
R-Board Meeting Minutes
April 15, 2015 Meeting
Page 5
Mr. Withers then motioned, seconded by Mr. Milde, to pass by exception the request for issuance of an annual
pass sticker to business owner Joe Wilson.
By voice, the vote was:
Yea:
(6)
Nay:
(0)
Absent:
(0)
Kelly, Milde, Cameron, Snellings, Romanello, Withers
New Business:
Discussion to Award Contract to TK Construction for the Construction of Cell F-2; RB15-03
Staff reminded the R-Board of previous actions relative to preparing bid documents and soliciting bids for
construction of Cell F-2. We received five bids, with T&K Construction, LLC the lowest responsive bid at
$5,062,968. They are the company that built Cell F1 to our satisfaction. If the R-Board decided to authorize
award of a contract to T&K, the authorization would be contingent on both local governments authorizing
financing support of $2 million each. The debt service would be about $700,000 annually for the 7-year
expected life of Cell F-2. Debt service payments in this amount is included in the proposed budget. Mr.
Romanello motioned, seconded by Mr. Milde, for RB15-03.
Discussion among R-Board members ensued, with Mr. Cameron questioning the timing and the City
commitment. Mr. Dayton said that the financing commitment will be presented for consideration to the
Stafford Board at their April 21st meeting. If authorized, Stafford will hold a public hearing May 19th to consider
approving the financing support. Mr. Romanello stated that the loan could be part of the summer Virginia
Resources Authority pool. It was noted by Mr. Cameron that City Council must also back the debt in order to
authorize the debt. It was also noted that the City Council will wait to see if the Stafford Board commits to the
financing. Staff reiterated that no contract will be signed until both local governments have authorized the
financing support. Mr. Dayton stated that staff could proceed with the contract execution following
authorization of financing by both local governments. He noted that there are sufficient reserves that can be
used before receiving the revenue from the loan proceeds by including refund language to replenish R-Board
reserves once the bonds are sold. He noted that the current financial plan includes the use of approximately $1
million in R-Board reserves, with the balance of $4 million being financed.
Mr. Kelly expressed concerns about authorizing a contract when we don’t know what action will be taken by
the local governments, and that we may have insufficient revenue to fund both cell construction and
operations costs.
Mr. Milde stated that he could not imagine the Stafford Board not agreeing to back the debt, since not
approving the financial support would result in closing the landfill. Mr. Romanello noted that it is important for
the resolution to reflect the reimbursement language from debt proceeds. He asked that the Resolution be
amended to include appropriate reimbursement language from debt proceeds written by the R-Board
attorney.
R-Board Meeting Minutes
April 15, 2015 Meeting
Page 6
On motion by Mr. Romanello, seconded by Mr. Milde, which carried by a vote of 6 to 0, RB15-03 was adopted:
The vote was:
Yea (6)
Kelly, Milde, Cameron, Romanello, Snellings, Withers
No (0)
Resolution RB15-03 Reads:
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A CONTRACT WITH T & K CONSTRUCTION, LLC FOR
CONSTRUCTION OF CELL F-2 AT THE RAPPAHANNOCK REGIONAL LANDFILL
WHEREAS, the current operational landfill cell at the Rappahannock Regional Landfill (Landfill) is
expected to be filled around the end of 2015; and
WHEREAS, the design for the next planned operational landfill cell, F-2, was completed and offered for
public bids; and
WHEREAS, five (5) bids were received, with the lowest bid received from T&K Construction, LLC (T&K),
in the amount of $5,062,968; and
WHEREAS, staff has reviewed this bid and determined that T&K is the lowest responsive bidder; and
WHEREAS, the continuation of solid waste services is dependent on the completion of Cell F-2; and
WHEREAS, funding for construction is proposed to be provided from withdrawing approximately
$1,067,000 from reserve funds, with the balance from financing backed by the City of Fredericksburg and
Stafford County; and
WHEREAS, the City Council and Board of Supervisors will consider the matter of financing support for
the Landfill at their upcoming meetings; and
WHEREAS, a contract will not be issued until financing support is assured;
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Rappahannock Regional Solid Waste Management Board on
this the 15th day of April, 2015, that the County Administrator or his Designee, be authorized to execute a
contract with T&K Construction, LLC for construction of Cell F-2 at the Rappahannock Regional Landfill in an
amount not to exceed Five Million, Sixty-two Thousand, Nine Hundred Sixty-eight Dollars, ($5,062,968) unless
modified by a duly executed change order; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the contract with T&K Construction, LLC shall not be executed until
financing support from the City of Fredericksburg and Stafford County has been approved; and
BE IT STILL FURTHER RESOLVED that the R-Board intends that funds that have been advanced or may
be advanced by the R-Board for costs related to Cell F-2 may be reimbursed from proceeds of the bonds issued
by the County and City in accordance with U.S. Treasury Regulation Section 1.1-150.2 and other Treasury
regulations.
R-Board Meeting Minutes
April 15, 2015 Meeting
Page 7
Proposed FY2016 Budget
Mr. Dayton noted the following about the proposed budget:
 The budget is structurally balanced.
 We are not using or replenishing reserve funds.
 There are no changes in core services.
 The budget does not include any local government subsidies.
 It assumes Cell F-2 will be funded, constructed, and in operation by early 2016.
The total budget amount reflects a 15.5% increase, primarily due to the debt service of $700,000 for funding
Cell F-2. There are personnel cost increases including a 2% cost of living raise matching Stafford County
actions, as well as personnel and operation costs related to the resident fee program. There are 4 new part
time, week-end staff positions for the gatehouse locations at both convenience centers. There’s an additional
$15,000 in overtime due to the scales being open during weekend resident collection hours. There is a deferral
of all capital expenditures except for the Cell F-2 debt service. We will utilize FY15 rollover funds for essential
purchases. The expenditure budget does not include any depreciation or closure/post closure costs.
On the revenue side there is an additional $125,000 from the City due to increasing their tipping from $20 to
$34 per ton as approved by previous R-Board action. Total revenue of $750,000 from the residential fee
program is included, along with an increase of $525,000 from commercial haulers tip fees. Total increased
revenues are $1.4 million, which will offset projected FY2015 operational losses, the added debt service and
professional services costs for Cell F-2 construction, and the operational costs for the resident fee program.
Recycling revenue has been reduced from FY2015 actual performance, due to more changes in market
dynamics causing a reduction in the value of our single stream recycling products. We will continue our
aggressive recycling programs; however, net revenue is expected to drop. We have included revenues for
recycling of $286,000.
Staff recommended approval of RB15-02.
Mr. Cameron questioned the proposed increase of County administrative charges by $29,000. Mr. Romanello
explained that the fees are for the County’s cost to support R-Board. The charge is based on cost of the
services provided and calculated from prior year level of effort. This is also reflected as revenue in the County
budget.
Mr. Snellings requested a detailed breakdown of the administrative charges. He also questioned whether it
was necessary to vote on the budget today.
Mr. Withers noted that City Council discussed the increase in tipping fees. The Council does not appear to be in
support of the higher fees. They question why the City’s per-ton fee is higher than major hauler fees over
1,500 tons. The City feels they should have same fee as major haulers. Mr. Dayton noted that the current rate
is over 1,500 tons per month is around $32 per ton. We are still considering lowering these fees to attract
more customer waste, but have not done so at present. Mr. Withers stated that he is not sure that City Council
would vote for this increase in their budget. Mr. Romanello asked if we could set the City rate consistent with
the high volume hauler rates. This would adjust as the fee structure adjusts. Mr. Withers felt that the City
might consider that approach, but certainly do not want to pay higher than commercial customers.
R-Board Meeting Minutes
April 15, 2015 Meeting
Page 8
Mr. Kelly stated that the City has stepped up to plate and agreed to pay tipping fees. The City is the only one of
the partners attempting to comply with the Operational Agreement provisions requiring that all operational
deficits shall be split proportionally. The City feels that paying the current tipping fee for their tonnage meets
this requirement. Having seen no reciprocation on this front from Stafford has left them questioning their
need to pay more. He noted that the City is a much smaller locality and an increase of a few hundred thousand
dollars is, for them, difficult to handle. The City still wants to do their part but is not interested in paying more
than they are currently paying. He felt the City Council’s general consensus is to pay current tip fee.
Mr. Snelling noted his concern with the position taken by the Board of Supervisors. He requested information
on the subsidy amount Stafford owes per the agreement for this and the next fiscal year. He will put it on the
agenda and ask the Stafford Board to pay the subsidies. Mr. Dayton noted that the subsidy is calculated and
due based upon previous years audit statement, so while he has the FY2014 amount, the FY2015 amount is
not available yet. Mr. Dayton was instructed to provide the FY2013 and FY2014 amounts.
Mr. Kelly noted that the decisions by Stafford County to not provide funding for R-Board operations, and
increasing administrative charges by $29,000, have affected the position of City Council. He noted that the
City is not giving their employees raises, and feels the additional $525,000 in revenue from commercial haulers
is very uncertain. He stated that he is not comfortable with moving forward on the budget at this time.
Mr. Romanello explained the cost allocation formula used by Stafford County. He said the R-Board will be
provided with the detailed amounts and their allocation. He noted that the R-Board employees are Stafford
employees by agreement. There has been no raise given in 2-years and that there is a 16% increase in
employee costs for medical benefits which employees must bear.
Mr. Kelly repeated his concern about the lack of assistance from the County Board and here is a raise in what
we are adding in costs to your budget.
Mr. Kelly asked if the Board was ready to move forward on the budget today. The Board decided to defer
action on the budget to a later meeting.
NEXT MEETING: May 20, 2015 at 1:30 PM at the George L. Gordon Government Center in Stafford County.
Mr. Kelly Adjourned the meeting at 3:30 P.M.
____________________________________
Keith C. Dayton, Director & Deputy County Administrator
____________________________________
Diane Jones, Acting Clerk
FINANCIAL STATUS THROUGH
April 30, 2015
EXPENDITURES
as of
April 30, 2015
Division
R-Board Expenses
TIPPING FEES
RECYCLING
WWTP SLUDGE/UTILITIES
MUNICIPAL
INTRADEPARTMENTAL
AMERESCO LEASE
GRANT
INTEREST
RESERVE
FY 15 Adopted
Budget
$4,298,681
$3,375,000
$280,740
$145,000
$324,000
$50,000
$68,000
$20,000
$35,000
$941
FY 15 Adjusted
Budget
Personnel
Costs YTD
Operational
Costs YTD
$1,542,658
$4,496,949
$1,278,680
Capital
Costs YTD
Total Costs
YTD
Current
Encumberances
$106,506 $2,927,844
FY 15
Expenditures
$381,808
$3,309,652
FY 15
Balance
% Budget
Expended
$1,187,297
Fiscal YTD
Expired (%)
74%
FY15 Budgeted
Revenues
as of
April 30, 2015
COMMERCIAL
RESIDENTIAL USER FEE
RECYCLING
SLUDGE/UTILITIES
MUNICIPAL
INTRADEPARTMENTAL
SALE OF LANDFILL GAS
GRANTS
INTEREST
RESERVE FUND
CASH
$
24,878
$
70,899
$
50,697
TOTAL
$
$
4,298,681
$
$
146,474
$
A/R
241,542
15,653
257,195
Total for Month FYTD Expired
$
266,420
83%
$
70,899
83%
$
50,697
83%
$
19,252
83%
$
15,653
83%
83%
$
6,838
83%
83%
83%
83%
$
429,759
FY YEAR TO DATE
$
2,367,061
$
203,000
$
331,301
$
128,638
$
153,991
$
2,345
$
39,529
$
26,944
$
$
3,252,809
REVENUE FORECAST
$
2,851,410
$
275,000
$
399,092
$
154,960
$
170,000
$
2,825
$
41,000
$
26,944
$
$
3,921,231
BUDGET STATUS SUMMARY
Adopted Budget Current Est. Difference
Revenues
$4,297,740
$3,921,231
$4,298,681
$4,298,681
-$376,509
Expenditures
$0
Use of Fund
Balance
$941
Unrestricted Fund Balance
(as of June 30, 2014)
Monthly
Actuals
FY15 Actual % Revenue
Revenues
Collected
83% $4,298,681 $358,223 $429,759 $3,252,809
REVENUES
ADOPTED FY15
$
3,375,000
$
$
280,740
$
145,000
$
324,000
$
50,000
$
68,000
$
20,000
$
35,000
$
941
Monthly
Target
$377,450 ($376,509)
($819,938)
76%
Through March 31, 2015
Rappahannock Regional Solid Waste Management Board
Weight and Material Analysis Report FY2015
CATEGORY
15-Apr
Weight
14-Apr
Weight
FY2015 Y-T-D
Weight
FY2014 Y-T-D
Weight
Difference
%
Billable
Commercial Waste
Residential Waste
Fredericksburg
Eskimo Hill
Belman Road
Mixed Load-$71/T
Debris Waste
**Dirt
Tires Commercial
Sludge
BILLABLE TONNAGE
1866
1557
783
1890
194
0
2734
1803
15
1132
3157
2023
545
1717
273
2.9
1959
20
17
857.11
19261
16923
7784
16458
2203
21
21115
16386
141
7560
23321
30941
6972
13193
2459
17
19480
2327
113
7061
-17%
-45%
12%
25%
-10%
24%
8%
604%
25%
7%
11974
10571
107852
105884
2%
21.03
24.55
177
256
-31%
570
1574
5559.5
6321
-12%
12565
12170
113588
112461
1%
Non-Billable
Litter/Cleanups
Recycling
TOTAL TONNAGE
** Estimated Weights
TO:
R-Board Members
FROM:
Keith Dayton
Deputy County Administrator
DATE:
May 15, 2015
SUBJECT:
Resident Fee Update
The resident fee program has now been in effect for 2.5 months. An update of staff observations regarding the
program follows.
Operational
Belman Road
The Belman Road convenience center continues to see a drop in activity compared to that observed prior to the
resident fees.
Eskimo Hill
We have Eskimo Hill staffed with the part time employees on weekends to assist with managing traffic flow. There
have been no observed changes operationally, with waste amounts still well above pre-resident fee levels.
Financial Performance
As of May 15th, the R-Board has netted nearly $340,000 from the resident fee program. Of that about 60% has
come from the sale of annual passes, as we are now seeing a dramatic decline in sale of annual passes.
Daily cash sales were consistently strong, although we observed a dramatic decline last week. We will be
monitoring that trend closely.
Staff is projecting total collections of about $275,000 in revenue by the end of the fiscal year.
Litter
We have no additional reports of illegal dumping since those we reported at the March 12th R-Board meeting.
KCD:kd
TO:
R-Board Members
FROM:
Keith Dayton
Deputy County Administrator
DATE:
May 20, 2015
SUBJECT: Proposed FY2016 Budget
Staff presented the draft budget at the April 15, 2015 R-Board meeting. R-Board members raised numerous
questions about specific expenditures line items which were addressed in a subsequent email (attached),
along with revised expenditure and revenue budgets addressing certain changes identified in the email. The
revised expenditure and revenue budgets are attached to this report, reflecting the capital outlay of an
additional $1,067,000 from reserve funds for Cell F-2 construction. Proposed Resolution RB15-02 is
attached should the R-Board wish to adopt this budget.
R-Board members also expressed concern about the increase of $125,000 in user fee revenue proposed from
residents of the City. The added revenue was estimated based on an increase in City tipping fees from the
current amount of $20 per ton, to $34 per ton, using the City tonnage from FY2014.
Staff has prepared an alternative budget that assumes no increase in City tipping fees, and with the $125,000
shortage of revenue generated through an increase in commercial tipping fees. Proposed Resolution RB1504 is attached should the R-Board wish to approve the alternative budget.
Staff recommends adopting a budget at the May 20 meeting to allow staff adequate time to enter the budget
into the County’s financial system, and to complete the preliminary work necessary to allow purchasing
activities to commence immediately after the start of the next fiscal year on July 1.
KCD:kd
Attachments:
Staff Report Dated April 13, 2015
Email Dated April 22, 2015
Revised Draft FY2016 Budget
Resolution RB15-02
Alternative Draft FY2016 Budget
Resolution RB15-04
RAPPAHANNOCK REGIONAL LANDFILL
FISCAL YEAR 2016 ALTERNATIVE PROPOSED EXPENDITURE BUDGET
10-01
10-02
10-03
21-01
22-10
23-01
23-02
23-03
24-01
25-01
25-21
27-20
28-02
28-05
28-09
28-20
31-08
31-20
31-30
31-44
31-50
31-52
31-63
31-67
31-68
32-10
33-09
33-10
33-20
34-05
35-01
36-12
39-10
40-07
51-10
51-30
52-10
52-30
52-31
52-38
53-04
53-05
54-10
Salaries-Regular
Salaries-Overtime
Salaries-Part Time
Social Security/Medicare
VRS
Anthem
IBNR
Opt-Out
Life Insurance
Unemployment
Hybrid Disability Program
Workers Compensation
Compensated Absences
Chg Post-retiremt Benefit
License/Certifications
Education/Tuition Assist
Subtotal Compensation
Acquired Services
Physical Exams
Audit Fee's
Management Services
Environmental Monitoring
Legal Services
Permit Fee's
Cleaning Services
CFL & HHW Bulb Disposal
Tire Disposal
Temp Agencies
Maintenance
Facilities-Buildings
Repairs & Maintenance
Contracts
Transportation
Transportation
Printing & Binding
Other
Litter Control
Internal Services
Admin Charges-Fiscal Agnt
Utilities, Vehicle Repair & Office
Electrical
Water & Sewer
Postage
Phone
Mobile Phones
VOIP Eqp Billing
Property
Motor Vehicle
Equipment
FY2014
Actual
1,191,770
70,911
1,065
93,683
131,148
296,268
1,329
630
14,034
7,314
206
37,137
5,445
84,705
1,985
150
1,937,780
FY2015
FY2016
Adopted Proposed
Budget
Budget
1,235,820 1,260,536
85,000
100,000
0
65,416
94,550
96,922
133,210
136,667
362,650
357,959
0
0
1,000
1,000
14,680
15,088
12,000
12,000
53,109
53,109
0
0
25,000
0
3,500
3,500
1,500
1,500
2,022,019 2,103,697
Inc/Dec
Amount
Inc/Dec %
24,716
2.0%
15,000
17.6%
65,416
0.0%
2,372
2.5%
3,457
2.6%
(4,691)
(1.3)%
0
0.0%
0
0.0%
408
2.8%
0
0.0%
0
0
(25,000)
0
0
81,678
0.0%
0.0%
(100.0)%
0.0%
0.0%
4.0%
533
16,775
187,863
146,113
17,500
16,536
2,096
46,979
38,888
0
1,000
17,000
200,000
150,000
18,000
20,000
3,500
38,000
68,000
0
1,000
17,000
275,000
220,000
19,500
40,000
0
55,000
55,000
0
0
0
75,000
70,000
1,500
20,000
(3,500)
17,000
(13,000)
0
0.0%
0.0%
37.5%
46.7%
8.3%
100.0%
(100.0)%
44.7%
(19.1)%
0.0%
15,287
140,454
13,710
10,000
165,000
15,000
8,000
165,000
20,000
(2,000)
0
5,000
(20.0)%
0.0%
33.3%
0
1,000
1,000
0
0.0%
968
3,226
61,159
1,500
2,000
70,000
10,000
2,000
70,000
8,500
0
0
566.7%
0.0%
0.0%
241,262
241,262
252,929
11,667
4.8%
18,606
5,035
704
12,686
7,894
5,950
33,950
18,000
3,961
22,000
8,200
700
18,000
15,000
10,000
40,000
25,000
8,000
20,000
6,000
2,200
16,000
12,000
8,000
44,000
27,500
8,000
(2,000)
(2,200)
1,500
(2,000)
(3,000)
(2,000)
4,000
2,500
0
(9.1)%
(26.8)%
214.3%
(11.1)%
(20.0)%
(20.0)%
10.0%
10.0%
0.0%
54-20
55-10
55-40
55-41
58-01
58-02
58-97
58-98
60-01
60-03
60-05
60-07
60-08
60-11
60-12
60-14
60-20
60-31
60-32
60-33
60-34
60-47
60-99
81-01
82-01
82-11
82-12
82-13
97-02
Building or Office
32,963
Travel & Training
Mileage/Parking/Tolls
738
Seminars & Conferences
2,928
Meeting Expenses
2,646
Dues & Membership
930
Contingency
Contingency-General
0
Depreciation Expenses
0
Post Closure/Closure Cost
0
Misc. Supplies
Office
7,885
Agricultural-Lawn Care
1,623
Custodial-Janitorial
14,554
Repairs & Maintenance
215,690
Vehicle Fuels
292,546
Uniform & Wearing Apparel
16,760
Books/Subscrptns/Sf Media
898
Operating
2,176
Vehicle Parts & Tires
23,361
Machinery & Equipment
586
Furniture & Fixtures
0
Communications Equipment
90
Computer Equipment
966
Site Improvements
40,871
Miscellaneous
0
Subtotal Operations 1,714,346
Capital Costs
Machinery & Equipment (Repair)
174,092
Machinery & Equipment (New)
33,091
Improvements to Site-Cell F-2*
264,140
Improvements to Building
18,773
Road Improvements
0
Loss on Disposal of F.A.
0
Subtotal Capital
490,096
TOTAL 4,142,222
*$700k in debt service; balance from reserve funds
20,000
20,000
1,000
3,000
3,000
2,000
1,000
3,000
2,000
1,500
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
(1,000)
(500)
0
0
0
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
(33.3)%
(25.0)%
#DIV/0!
0.0%
0.0%
6,500
6,500
4,500
4,500
18,000
12,000
250,000
250,000
330,000
300,000
15,000
20,000
1,000
1,000
2,500
6,000
35,000
30,000
15,000
10,000
2,000
1,500
500
500
1,500
1,500
50,000
105,000
0
0
1,928,662 2,131,129
0
0
(6,000)
0
(30,000)
5,000
0
3,500
(5,000)
(5,000)
(500)
0
0
55,000
0
202,467
0.0%
0.0%
(33.3)%
0.0%
(9.1)%
33.3%
0.0%
140.0%
(14.3)%
(33.3)%
(25.0)%
0.0%
0.0%
110.0%
0.0%
10.5%
220,000
12,849
128,000
0
0 1,767,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
348,000 1,779,849
4,298,681 6,014,675
(207,151)
(128,000)
1,767,000
(0)
(0)
0
1,431,849
1,715,994
(94.2)%
(100.0)%
1000%
1000%
1000%
0.0%
411%
39.9%
RAPPAHANNOCK REGIONAL LANDFILL
FISCAL YEAR 2016
ALTERNATIVE PROPOSED REVENUE BUDGET
315.01-02
316.25-01
316.25-02
324.04-07
Interest
Recycling
Commercial
Grants
Residential Fees
324.04-07
Municipal
316.25-25-04
Fredericksburg
316.25-25-03
Stafford
318.92-30
Sludge/Utilities
Ameresco Lease
Intradepartmental
Subtotal
341.06-00
Prior Yr Fund Balance
Adopted
FY15Budget
$
35,000
$
280,740
$ 3,375,000
$
20,000
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
170,000
154,000
145,000
68,000
50,000
4,297,740
941
4,298,681
Proposed
FY16 Budget
$
25,000
$
286,675
$ 3,433,000
$
20,000
$
750,000
$
$
$
170,000
$
40,000
$
145,000
$
68,000
$
10,000
$ 4,947,675
$ 1,067,000
$ 6,014,675
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
Inc/Dec
Amount
(10,000)
5,935
58,000
750,000
(114,000)
(40,000)
649,935
1,066,059
1,715,994
Inc/Dec
Percent
-29%
2%
2%
0%
1,000%
0%
-74%
0%
0%
-80%
15%
1,000%
40%
RB15-04
PROPOSED
RAPPAHANNOCK REGIONAL
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT BOARD
RESOLUTION
At the regular meeting of the Rappahannock Regional Solid Waste Management Board (RBoard) held in the Board of Supervisors Chambers, Stafford County Administration Center, 1300
Courthouse Rd., Stafford, Virginia, on the day of , 2015;
Members:
Vote:
Mathew J. Kelly, Chairman
Paul V. Milde, III, Vice-chairman
Beverly R. Cameron
Anthony J. Romanello
Gary Snellings
William C. Withers, Jr.
On motion of , seconded by , which carried by a vote of to , the following was adopted:
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE FISCAL YEAR 2016 R-BOARD BUDGET
WHEREAS, the R-Board is committed to providing high quality solid waste services to the
residents and businesses in the City of Fredericksburg and Stafford County; and
WHEREAS, the continuation of these services is dependent on the completion of Cell F-2;
and
WHEREAS, the R-Board is also committed operating the Rappahannock Regional Landfill
in a cost effective, environmentally responsible manner; and
WHEREAS, the proposed budget addresses those goals in a fiscally responsible manner; and
WHEREAS, the proposed budget addresses the financial concerns of each locality in an
equitable manner;
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Rappahannock Regional Solid Waste
Management Board on this the day of , 2015, that the alternative proposed budget presented at the
May 20, 2015, meeting be and it hereby is approved.
A Copy, teste:
RAPPAHANNOCK REGIONAL SOLID WASTE
MANAGEMENT BOARD
__________________________________________
Keith C. Dayton, Director
TO:
R-Board Members
FROM:
Keith Dayton
Deputy County Administrator
DATE:
April 13, 2015
SUBJECT: Proposed FY2016 Budget
Staff has prepared the proposed FY2016 budget for R-Board consideration. In developing this proposed
budget, staff has proceeded based on the following premises:








The budget is structurally balanced, with no decrease or increase in reserve funds.
There will be no change in core services, and no direct local government subsidies.
Cell F-2 will be funded and constructed in FY2016, to be operational early in 2016.
Each line item in the expenditure budget has been scrutinized for potential savings.
Personnel costs reflect the 2% cost of living raise included in the proposed Stafford County budget.
Personnel and operational cost increases necessary to support the resident fee program are included.
With the exception of debt service for Cell F-2, capital expenditures were deferred. Essential
purchases will be funded from FY2015 carry over funds.
The revenue strategy presented to the R-Board at the March 12 meeting has been incorporated.
This has resulted in a proposed FY2016 budget of $4,964,675. Key issues related to the expenditures and
revenues incorporated in this budget are provided below.
Expenditures
The primary expenditure affecting the proposed budget is the $700,000 debt service cost to fund Cell F-2
construction over the seven year expected service life. Although staff expects actual debt service to be
somewhat lower, budgeting in this amount is recommended. This will be a recurring expense in future
budgets. Additional project oversight and quality assurance expenses in the amount of approximately
$100,000 are included to manage construction of this project.
Staff has included $45,000 to regulatory expenses for compliance activities related to the exceedances
detected adjacent to the original landfill cell (Area 74). We expect to resolve this matter in the current fiscal
year. We have also budgeted $20,000 for the cost of our EPA air permit.
Staff has included additional personnel costs of approximately $80,000 to administer the resident fee
program, along with another $10,000 for operational costs of the program.
Stafford County has increased administrative charges for the staff support they provide by approximately
12%, or nearly $29,000. The total for this charge is now $270,000.
The net effect of these changes is a proposed budget that is 15.5% higher than the FY2015 adopted budget.
R-Board Memorandum
Page 2
April 13, 2015
Revenues
As noted above, the increases in revenues proposed at the March 12, 2015, R-Board meeting have been
incorporated in the revenue budget. This new revenue provides sufficient total revenue to produce a
structurally balanced budget, even with the added debt service cost to construct Cell F-2. Specifically, these
are:
Increase City Tipping Fee to $34/ton
Resident Fees Equivalent to $34/ton
Adjust Commercial Rates Over 1,500 tons/month
TOTAL
$125,000
$750,000
$525,000
$1,400,000
Other revenue categories reflect data from our FY2015 performance to date, with the exception of recycling
revenue. Staff is aware that recycling commodity prices have fallen recently which will result in poorer
performance of our recycling returns in FY2016. While we won’t have details on amended pricing for
recycled products until early in FY2016, we have adjusted our projected revenue down by 24% from current
performance. This is slightly above the amount of recycling revenue budgeted in FY2015.
Realizing the additional $1,400,000 in revenue listed above is dependent upon a number of factors over
which the R-Board has varying degrees of control. Actual fiscal performance may vary substantially from
the budgeted amounts.
Similar to the FY2015 budget, the proposed FY2016 budget anticipates insufficient revenues to replenish the
reserve fund, cover any increases in closure/post-closure costs, or address depreciation expenses.
Staff recommends approval of RB15-02, adopting the FY2016 R-Board budget.
KCD:kd
Attachments:
Proposed FY2016 Budget
Resolution RB15-02
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:
Keith C. Dayton
Matt Kelly ([email protected]); Matt Kelly ([email protected]); [email protected]; Bill
Withers ([email protected]); gary snellings ([email protected]); Anthony J. Romanello;
Beverly R. Cameron ([email protected])
[email protected]; Maria J. Perrotte; Jason M. Pauley; Diane L. Jones; Julie Daves; Christina M. Morgan
R-Board Budget
Wednesday, April 22, 2015 1:09:00 PM
FY2016 Expenditure Budget.pdf
FY2016 Revenue Budget.pdf
R-Board Members:
After the last R-Board meeting I realized that the proposed revenue and expenditure
budgets included in your packages did not accurately depict the budget. We have proposed
the use of $1,067,000 from reserve funds for Cell F-2. This will show up in the expenditure
budget as a capital expense, and in the revenue budget as a withdrawal from prior year
fund balance. Although this is consistent with our previous staff recommendations, it wasn’t
shown correctly in the proposed budget. I have included updated proposed budgets with
this oversight corrected.
There was some discussion of the increase in administrative charges in the proposed
budget. After some research, it seems that one item included under administrative charges
– Audit Cost – in the amount of $17,194, was also included as a line item in the budget in
the amount of $17,000. The audit amount has been removed from administrative charges,
reducing this to $252,929. This is shown in the revised expenditure budget.
This represents an increase of about $11,000 from the amount in the FY2015 budget, and
results in an increase in support from the County information technology group. The main
contributors to administrative charges come from the Treasurer and Finance staff in support
of our financial and billing efforts, although other County agencies provide support as well. Although we have received support from the County Attorney on several issues lately, they
did not include any charges in the FY2016 administrative fee.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Regards, Keith
Keith C. Dayton
Deputy County Administrator
Stafford County, Virginia
540-658-5125
RAPPAHANNOCK REGIONAL LANDFILL
FISCAL YEAR 2016 PROPOSED EXPENDITURE BUDGET
10-01
10-02
10-03
21-01
22-10
23-01
23-02
23-03
24-01
25-01
25-21
27-20
28-02
28-05
28-09
28-20
31-08
31-20
31-30
31-44
31-50
31-52
31-63
31-67
31-68
32-10
33-09
33-10
33-20
34-05
35-01
36-12
39-10
40-07
51-10
51-30
52-10
52-30
52-31
52-38
53-04
53-05
54-10
Salaries-Regular
Salaries-Overtime
Salaries-Part Time
Social Security/Medicare
VRS
Anthem
IBNR
Opt-Out
Life Insurance
Unemployment
Hybrid Disability Program
Workers Compensation
Compensated Absences
Chg Post-retiremt Benefit
License/Certifications
Education/Tuition Assist
Subtotal Compensation
Acquired Services
Physical Exams
Audit Fee's
Management Services
Environmental Monitoring
Legal Services
Permit Fee's
Cleaning Services
CFL & HHW Bulb Disposal
Tire Disposal
Temp Agencies
Maintenance
Facilities-Buildings
Repairs & Maintenance
Contracts
Transportation
Transportation
Printing & Binding
Other
Litter Control
Internal Services
Admin Charges-Fiscal Agnt
Utilities, Vehicle Repair & Office
Electrical
Water & Sewer
Postage
Phone
Mobile Phones
VOIP Eqp Billing
Property
Motor Vehicle
Equipment
FY2015
FY2016
FY2014
Adopted Proposed
Actual
Budget
Budget
1,191,770 1,235,820 1,260,536
70,911
85,000
100,000
1,065
0
65,416
93,683
94,550
96,922
131,148
133,210
136,667
296,268
362,650
357,959
1,329
0
0
630
1,000
1,000
14,034
14,680
15,088
7,314
12,000
12,000
206
37,137
53,109
53,109
5,445
0
0
84,705
25,000
0
1,985
3,500
3,500
150
1,500
1,500
1,937,780 2,022,019 2,103,697
Inc/Dec
Amount
Inc/Dec %
24,716
2.0%
15,000
17.6%
65,416
0.0%
2,372
2.5%
3,457
2.6%
(4,691)
(1.3)%
0
0.0%
0
0.0%
408
2.8%
0
0.0%
0
0
(25,000)
0
0
81,678
0.0%
0.0%
(100.0)%
0.0%
0.0%
4.0%
533
16,775
187,863
146,113
17,500
16,536
2,096
46,979
38,888
0
1,000
17,000
200,000
150,000
18,000
20,000
3,500
38,000
68,000
0
1,000
17,000
275,000
220,000
19,500
40,000
0
55,000
55,000
0
0
0
75,000
70,000
1,500
20,000
(3,500)
17,000
(13,000)
0
0.0%
0.0%
37.5%
46.7%
8.3%
100.0%
(100.0)%
44.7%
(19.1)%
0.0%
15,287
140,454
13,710
10,000
165,000
15,000
8,000
165,000
20,000
(2,000)
0
5,000
(20.0)%
0.0%
33.3%
0
1,000
1,000
0
0.0%
968
3,226
61,159
1,500
2,000
70,000
10,000
2,000
70,000
8,500
0
0
566.7%
0.0%
0.0%
241,262
241,262
252,929
11,667
4.8%
18,606
5,035
704
12,686
7,894
5,950
33,950
18,000
3,961
22,000
8,200
700
18,000
15,000
10,000
40,000
25,000
8,000
20,000
6,000
2,200
16,000
12,000
8,000
44,000
27,500
8,000
(2,000)
(2,200)
1,500
(2,000)
(3,000)
(2,000)
4,000
2,500
0
(9.1)%
(26.8)%
214.3%
(11.1)%
(20.0)%
(20.0)%
10.0%
10.0%
0.0%
54-20
55-10
55-40
55-41
58-01
58-02
58-97
58-98
60-01
60-03
60-05
60-07
60-08
60-11
60-12
60-14
60-20
60-31
60-32
60-33
60-34
60-47
60-99
81-01
82-01
82-11
82-12
82-13
97-02
Building or Office
32,963
20,000
20,000
Travel & Training
Mileage/Parking/Tolls
738
1,000
1,000
Seminars & Conferences
2,928
3,000
3,000
Meeting Expenses
2,646
3,000
2,000
Dues & Membership
930
2,000
1,500
Contingency
Contingency-General
0
0
0
Depreciation Expenses
0
0
0
Post Closure/Closure Cost
0
0
0
Misc. Supplies
Office
7,885
6,500
6,500
Agricultural-Lawn Care
1,623
4,500
4,500
Custodial-Janitorial
14,554
18,000
12,000
Repairs & Maintenance
215,690
250,000
250,000
Vehicle Fuels
292,546
330,000
300,000
Uniform & Wearing Apparel
16,760
15,000
20,000
Books/Subscrptns/Sf Media
898
1,000
1,000
Operating
2,176
2,500
6,000
Vehicle Parts & Tires
23,361
35,000
30,000
Machinery & Equipment
586
15,000
10,000
Furniture & Fixtures
0
2,000
1,500
Communications Equipment
90
500
500
Computer Equipment
966
1,500
1,500
Site Improvements
40,871
50,000
105,000
Miscellaneous
0
0
0
Subtotal Operations 1,714,346 1,928,662 2,131,129
Capital Costs
Machinery & Equipment (Repair)
174,092
220,000
12,849
Machinery & Equipment (New)
33,091
128,000
0
Improvements to Site-Cell F-2*
264,140
0 1,767,000
Improvements to Building
18,773
0
0
Road Improvements
0
0
0
Loss on Disposal of F.A.
0
0
0
Subtotal Capital
490,096
348,000 1,779,849
TOTAL 4,142,222 4,298,681 6,014,675
*$700k in debt service; balance from reserve funds
0
0
0
(1,000)
(500)
0
0
0
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
(33.3)%
(25.0)%
#DIV/0!
0.0%
0.0%
0
0
(6,000)
0
(30,000)
5,000
0
3,500
(5,000)
(5,000)
(500)
0
0
55,000
0
202,467
0.0%
0.0%
(33.3)%
0.0%
(9.1)%
33.3%
0.0%
140.0%
(14.3)%
(33.3)%
(25.0)%
0.0%
0.0%
110.0%
0.0%
10.5%
(207,151)
(128,000)
1,767,000
(0)
(0)
0
1,431,849
1,715,994
(94.2)%
(100.0)%
1000%
1000%
1000%
0.0%
411%
39.9%
RAPPAHANNOCK REGIONAL LANDFILL
FISCAL YEAR 2016
PROPOSED REVENUE BUDGET
315.01-02
316.25-01
316.25-02
324.04-07
Interest
Recycling
Commercial
Grants
Residential Fees
324.04-07
Municipal
316.25-25-04
Fredericksburg
316.25-25-03
Stafford
318.92-30
Sludge/Utilities
Ameresco Lease
Intradepartmental
Subtotal
341.06-00
Prior Yr Fund Balance
Adopted
FY15Budget
$
35,000
$
280,740
$ 3,375,000
$
20,000
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
170,000
154,000
145,000
68,000
50,000
4,297,740
941
4,298,681
Proposed
FY16 Budget
$
25,000
$
286,675
$ 3,308,000
$
20,000
$
750,000
$
$
$
295,000
$
40,000
$
145,000
$
68,000
$
10,000
$ 4,947,675
$ 1,067,000
$ 6,014,675
Inc/Dec
Amount
(10,000)
5,935
(67,000)
750,000
Inc/Dec
Percent
-29%
2%
-2%
0%
1,000%
$
125,000
$ (114,000)
$
$
$
(40,000)
$
649,935
$ 1,066,059
$ 1,715,994
74%
-74%
0%
0%
-80%
15%
1,000%
40%
$
$
$
$
$
RB15-02
PROPOSED
RAPPAHANNOCK REGIONAL
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT BOARD
RESOLUTION
At the regular meeting of the Rappahannock Regional Solid Waste Management Board (RBoard) held in the Board of Supervisors Chambers, Stafford County Administration Center, 1300
Courthouse Rd., Stafford, Virginia, on the day of , 2015;
Members:
Vote:
Mathew J. Kelly, Chairman
Paul V. Milde, III, Vice-chairman
Beverly R. Cameron
Anthony J. Romanello
Gary Snellings
William C. Withers, Jr.
On motion of , seconded by , which carried by a vote of to , the following was adopted:
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE FISCAL YEAR 2016 R-BOARD BUDGET
WHEREAS, the R-Board is committed to providing high quality solid waste services to
the residents and businesses in the City of Fredericksburg and Stafford County; and
WHEREAS, the continuation of these services is dependent on the completion of
Cell F-2; and
WHEREAS, the R-Board is also committed operating the Rappahannock Regional
Landfill in a cost effective, environmentally responsible manner; and
WHEREAS, the proposed budget addresses those goals in a fiscally responsible manner;
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Rappahannock Regional Solid Waste
Management Board on this the day of , 2015, that the proposed budget presented at the April
15, 2015, meeting be and it hereby is approved.
A Copy, teste:
RAPPAHANNOCK REGIONAL SOLID WASTE
MANAGEMENT BOARD
__________________________________________
Keith C. Dayton, Director