1. law, govt and politics
2. politics
3. elections

REPUBL ICAN NAT ION AL LAWYERS ASS OCIATION
April 13, 2015
Randy Evans
Chair
Kimberly Reed
Co-Chair
Larry Levy
President
Elliot Berke
First Vice-President
David Bowsher
Vice-President,
Judicial Affairs
Mark Braden
Vice-President,
Election Education
Joanne Young
Vice-President,
Finance
Jacob Curtis
Vice-President,
Membership
Timothy Kronquist
Vice-President,
Washington Operations
Frank Salinger
Vice-President,
Communications
Thomas Wheeler
Vice President,
Programming
Dear Members of the Florida Legislature,
As members of the Republican National Lawyers’ Association (RNLA), it is our
sincere hope that the Florida Legislature would review and amend current election
bills to facilitate the sharing of voter registration data across state lines. This
common sense election reform was approved by a bipartisan group of national
election experts and is absolutely necessary to advance clean elections in
America.
The RNLA was created to promote open, fair and honest elections at all levels of
American society in a non-discriminatory manner and to provide access to the
polls to all qualified and eligible voters. With our shared goal of election
integrity, we would respectfully request that you consider legislative language
that would requires state election officials to develop a healthy program that
would integrate the comparison of other states voter registration lists into list
maintenance activities. A failure to do so simply encourages more obsolete and
outdated registrations on the voter rolls and potential duplicate voting fraud.
A 2012 study by the Pew Center on the States estimated that over 2.758 million
people are registered in multiple states and concluded that one of every eight
active voter registrations in the United States are no longer valid or are
significantly inaccurate. The recent Presidential Commission on Election
Administration (PCEA) pointed out the importance of the integrity of the voter
registration list and interstate data-sharing across the country. In many cases, the
lack of clean data resulted in long lines and confusion at polling places.
“Interstate exchanges of voter registration information should be expanded.
States should join interstate programs that share data and synchronize voter lists
so that states, on their own initiative, come as close as possible to creating an
accurate database of all eligible voters.”
Robert J. Horn
Founding Chair
Michael B. Thielen
Executive Director
P.O. Box 18965
Washington, D.C. 20036
Phone: (202) 802-0437
Fax: (202) 747-2873
www.RNLA.org
The RNLA strongly agrees with the PCEA’s recommendation that “states join
interstate programs to share data and synchronize voter lists so that states, on their
own initiative, come as close as possible to creating an accurate database of all
eligible voters.” The PCEA rightly recognized that one can directly trace
problems at the polling place, including long lines, back to deficiencies
somewhere in the voter registration process, often from inaccurate registration
records caused by inadequate list maintenance.
As the PCEA outlines in its report, there are many good reasons to participate in
programs like the interstate Voter Registration Crosscheck (IVRC). IVRC helps
identify records of individuals registered in a state where they no longer reside
who have also registered in their new state of residence. IVRC allow these states
to identify these double-registrations giving officials reliable information
necessary to cancel the registration record in the previous state or states of
residence. Removing these records from the rolls prevents the possibility of
double-voting or from someone using that old registration record to fraudulently
vote in that previous resident’s name.
Interstate Cooperation Prevents and Identifies Illegal Double-Voting
The interstate sharing of voter data equips registration officials with tools to
remove voters who remain on a state’s rolls after they have moved to and
registered in a second state thus preventing the possibility of double-voting. In
addition, it prevents fraud by cancelling records that could be exploited by
another individual who is aware that someone remains on the rolls yet no longer
resides in the state. Finally, these programs compare voting activity for
individuals, thus providing evidence of potential double-voting for prosecution
after it occurs.
As we have seen with third-party registration groups like ACORN that
intentionally or recklessly registered fictitious and ineligible individuals, there are
those who will abuse the registration process without adequate safeguards in
place. For example, without interstate data sharing there is nothing to prevent a
Florida resident registered in both Florida and Massachusetts from voting at the
polls on Election Day in Florida and casting a mail absentee ballot in
Massachusetts.
Minimizes Lines and Allows for Better Election Day Planning
Improving voter lists through interstate data sharing can help alleviate Election
Day problems, particularly in eliminating bottlenecks at the polling place check-in
table. Voters who appear at polling places with inaccurate registration records or
where they are not registered causes problems and delays in the check-in process.
When voters do not appear in the precinct’s pollbook or there is a discrepancy
between the information on the pollbook and what the voter provides, poll
workers are forced to spend extra time resolving those issues before permitting
that person to vote. Oftentimes poll workers have to contact the local election
office for instructions, request additional information from the voter to resolve the
discrepancies, require the voter to complete paperwork such as an affidavit or
registration application form, or require the voter to vote a provisional ballot.
During a low-turnout election or in small numbers these scenarios do not
seriously disrupt the traffic flow at a polling place. However, you have a recipe
for disaster in a high-turnout presidential election where many voters in a
particular precinct have these problems, each requiring several additional minutes
of a poll worker’s time. The result is a bottleneck at the check-in table that will
slow the processing of voters and begin to cause back-ups and lines. This scenario
was a large contributor to many of the long lines shown on television on Election
Day 2012.
State of Florida
Over 30 states are currently participating in data-sharing programs such as the
Interstate Voter Registration Crosscheck (IVRC) that compare over 100 million
registration records. Unfortunately, Florida does not actively participate in IVRC
or any other independent data-sharing of registration information with bordering
or transient states. As a recurring battleground state during general election cycle,
election reforms adopting interstate cooperation in Florida is absolutely necessary
to maintain the accuracy and integrity of the voter registration database.
During this legislative session, RNLA would request that you strongly consider
amendments to the election code that that would allow the State of Florida to
participate in these growing and vital programs. As a national group involved in
key voting integrity issues, RNLA is willing to work closely with you and your
staff to provide model language to adopt this common-sense recommendation.
Sincerely,
Pedro Allende
RNLA Florida Chapter Chair
Terri Gaffney
RNLA Florida Chapter Co-Chair
Manuel Iglesias
Vice Chair, Republican National
Lawyers Association
Jefferson Knight
Former Republican National
Lawyers Association Chair
JC Planas
State Representative, District 225
Tom Spencer
RNLA Board of Advisors
[Copies of signatures on file.]