North Atlantic Right Whales: Overview of Studies of in the Southeast and Mid-Atlantic Southeast Fisheries Science Center Dr. Lance P. Garrison Presentation to SAMFSC SSC April 29, 2015 Topics Covered • • • • NA Right whale Population Status and Trends Residency and Demographics Spatial Distribution and Habitat NARW habitat use outside of traditional calving area (“Mid-Atlantic waters”) U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 2 NARW Population Status and Trends • At least 455 individuals in 20101 • 2.8% estimated mean annual growth rate (19902010)1 1 Waring et al., 2013 U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 3 NARW Population Status and Trends • Calf mortality may be as high as 3/year1 • Population contains a smaller proportion of juveniles than expected2 • Slow growth rate compared to other large whale populations • Precariously small population • Frequently exposed to anthropogenic threats • Endangered under ESA • Depleted under MMPA (PBR = 0.9) 1 2 Browning et al., 2010 Hamilton et al. 1998, Best et al. 2001 U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 4 Southeast and Mid-Atlantic Right Whale Habitats • Seasonal presence in waters south of Virginia between November and April • Variable numbers of individual animals, but as many as 243 individuals from all demographic classes North Atlantic Right Whale Consortium http://www.narwc.org • Primary calving area is off the coast of Florida and Georgia, but animals occurring throughout the season as far north as North Carolina U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 5 Data Collection: Aerial Surveys (1992-2013) NOAA Fisheries funds the majority of the SE survey effort; however, other entities provide funds as well. GA/SC (black): Funded by NOAA and South Carolina Ports Authority (part of project submitted for ESA Section 7 consultation). GA/SC Surveys phased out after 2013/2014 calving season NEWS (blue): NOAA Cooperative State funds provided to GDNR through ESA Section 6 grant process. NOAA/SC Ports Authority (Coop State/Contract) NOAA Fisheries Svc (Coop State/ESA Sec. 6) ACOE/Navy/CG (Contract) NOAA Fisheries Svc (Coop State/MOA) CEWS (red): ACOE/Navy/CG (reguesting agencies) provides funds to NOAA (servicing agency) via Economy Act MOA. SEWS (green): NOAA Cooperative State funds provided to FWCC through ESA Section 6 MOA. U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 6 Data Collection: Aerial Surveys SEIT Recently Reviewed the Objectives and Design of the Aerial Survey Program • Reduced focus on ship strike mitigation given the vessel speed restrictions and other management efforts in place. • Increased focus on demographic data collection including documenting presence of animals in SEUS, documenting calving rates • Reflects anticipated reduced effort levels and implement a more adaptive design. SEUS RW Aerial survey tracks overlaid with model predictions of right whale occurrence. FWRI U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 7 Demographics and Residence Times in the SEUS SEUS Individuals by Age Class Proportion of Individuals 0.45 0.4 0.35 0.3 0.25 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.05 0 Calf (0) YOY (1) Juv (2-9) Adult (9+) Unknown U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 8 Demographics and Residence Times in the SEUS 120 Duration in SEUS: Adults by Month of Detection Number of Adults 100 Dec Jan 80 Feb Mar 60 40 20 0 <10 10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79 80-89 90+ Days Between First and Last Detection 66% (52/78) of adults first detected during December have durations in the SEUS of 60 days or more. 60% of adults detected in February have durations of <10 days, many of these with single sightings. U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 9 Demographics and Residence Times in the SEUS Seasonal Discovery Curves • New individuals are being observed late into the survey season with most curves not reaching asymptotes until mid to late March • There appears to be a midseason “surge” in new individuals in late-Jan to midFeb in most years • 2010/2011 was clearly an odd year with most new animals seen early in the season and an early asymptote. Cumulative Proportion 1.00 0.80 2005/2006 0.60 2006/2007 2007/2008 0.40 2008/2009 2009/2010 0.20 2010/2011 0.00 15-Nov 4-Jan 23-Feb Survey Week 14-Apr U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 10 Spatial Distribution and Habitat The spatial differences in sampling effort requires effort correction during spatial analysis U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 11 -5 -10 0. 00 70 -5 -20 Depth -15 0. 00 30 40 00 0. 0. 00 50 0. 00 60 -10 Effort -15 Bathymetry ns(SST, 2) 0 5 Spatial Distribution and Habitat -20 Species-Habitat Relationships 10 0.0 020 15 20 25 SST -25 0.00 10 -30 -35 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 SST SST Sightings Predictive Maps of Animal Density U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 12 Spatial Distribution and Habitat Evaluating Critical Habitat 1. 1Good, 2. C. 2008. Spatial Ecology of the North Atlantic Right Whale (Eubalaena glacialis). Dissertation. Duke University, Durham, NC. 2Keller, C. A., L. Garrison, R. Baumstark, L. I. Ward-Geiger, and E. Hines. 2012. Application of a habitat model to define calving habitat of the North Atlantic right whale in the southeastern United States. Endangered Species Research 18(1):73-87. U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 13 Application: Proposed Rule Revising Critical Habitat • Habitat models were applied to evaluate essential features that define right whale calving habitat(water temperature and depth) • Models were used to derive areas where these elements were most likely to occur • Proposed rule designating and expanded critical habitat in the SE. Keller et al. 2012 Fed Register 80 no. 34: 9314-9345 U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 14 Application: Ship Strike Risk Mitigation Possible vessel tracks into each port overlaid with density maps to identify routes with lowest risk to right whales. U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 15 Application: Ship Strike Risk Mitigation • Paths with lowest risk translated into recommended routes into port buoys • Routes mapped on navigational charts • Commercial vessel traffic has, over time collapsed into these recommended traffic lanes. Fonnesbeck et al. 2008 U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 16 Spatial Distribution and Habitat Recently Updated using data from 2003/2004 through 2012/2013 including SC/GA data. Gowan and Ortega-Ortiz, 2014 U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 17 Continuing Work in the Mid-Atlantic • Relatively little data available on the distribution and habitat use by right whales in waters between the calving grounds and the northeast feeding grounds • More difficult to undertake survey efforts since intermittently present at relatively low density • • • GA DNR Permit#15488 Recently SEFSC/SERO conducted a data assimilation project to compile sightings data for right whales in mid-Atlantic waters. Expanding passive acoustic effort into the midAtlantic Exploring less invasive telemetry tags as a tool to assess right whale movements during migration periods. GA DNR Permit#15488 U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 18 Continuing Work in the Mid-Atlantic Three limpet tags were deployed on right whales in the SEUS during January 2015 http://www.alaskasealife.org/New/research/index.php?page=sat_tagging.php Two tags had significant attachment durations (15+ days) Both animals moved north shortly after tagging There were no reported sightings of either whale north of Georgia Joint project of NMFS, Alaska Sea Life Center, University of Alaska Fairbanks, FWCC, and GA DNR. U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 19 Application: Fisheries Interactions • South Atlantic Fishery Management Council Regulatory Amendment 16 is considering the expansion of the Black Sea Bass pot fishery to include additional fishing during winter months in the southeast Atlantic • Potential for and increased number of interactions between right whales and vertical lines. • Habitat relationships were used to inform alternatives • Habitat models applied to evaluate the relative risk to right whales associated with different alternatives for the fishery. SERO, South Atlantic Fisheries Management Council Alternative management areas overlaid with right whale habitat models (Gowan and Ortega-Ortiz 2014) U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 20 Application of Spatial Models • Better characterize whale distribution than sightings • Relate cetacean distribution to environmental variables and predict cetacean occurrence based on those variables • Predict cetacean distribution within a study area not sampled U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 21
© Copyright 2024