Business Plan Catalyst Corporate Federal Credit Union 2012 Strategic Business and Capital Plan Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Background: Developing a Member Driven Solution Georgia Corporate ......................................................................................................................................... 4 Southwest Bridge Corporate .................................................................................................................... 6 Western Bridge Corporate ........................................................................................................................ 9 CUNA’s Corporate Credit Union Working Group......................................................................... 10 Organizational Overview Organizational Structure ......................................................................................................................... 11 Efficiency and Scalability......................................................................................................................... 15 Member Focus .............................................................................................................................................. 17 Governance .................................................................................................................................................... 19 Products and Services............................................................................................................................... 21 Capitalization ................................................................................................................................................ 25 Plan Status ...................................................................................................................................................... 34 Financial Performance Model Balance Sheet.................................................................................................................................. 36 Projections ..................................................................................................................................................... 39 Exhibit A: Catalyst Corporate’s Organizational Chart .............................................................................. 41 Exhibit B: Catalyst Corporate’s Products and Services............................................................................ 42 Exhibit C: Catalyst Corporate’s Model Balance Sheet ............................................................................... 43 Exhibit D: Catalyst Corporate’s Financial Projections ............................................................................. 44 1 Catalyst Corporate Federal Credit Union Business Plan Introduction Catalyst Corporate Federal Credit Union is a $2.0 billion wholesale financial cooperative located in Plano, Texas with a regional sales office in Duluth, Georgia. Catalyst Corporate arose from the merger of Southwest Bridge Corporate Federal Credit Union and Georgia Corporate Federal Credit Union. Catalyst Corporate has a national field of membership, provides wholesale financial services to 1,278 member and non-member credit unions either directly or through its CUSO – Catalyst Strategic Solutions. Nearly 900 capitalizing member institutions have invested in Catalyst Corporate through subscriptions to Perpetual Contributed Capital (PCC). Catalyst Corporate offers a wide array of correspondent, payment, investment and liquidity products and services. In February2011 Southwest Bridge Corporate and Georgia Corporate submitted a Strategic Business and Capital Plan (Business Plan) to its membership and the NCUA’s Office of Corporate Credit Unions (OCCU). This Business Plan described the creation of Catalyst Corporate through consolidation and a new business model that would lead to sufficient capitalization and retained earnings growth to meet the requirements of the NCUA’s Rules and Regulations Part 704 (Regulation 704), which was substantially revised in September 2010. Plan components were stated as follows: 1) Consolidation of Southwest Bridge Corporate and Georgia Corporate operations 2) Formation of a scalable, low-cost provider of products and services strategically positioned to increase product and service volumes 3) Creation of a smaller balance sheet and lower member-contributed capital requirements 4) Limited deposit access to overnight investment accounts 5) Restricted issuance of share certificates 6) Potential transition from U.S. Central products and services Following the acceptance of the Business Plan, the two corporates raised sufficient capital to meet the objectives of the plan, the merger was consummated, and Catalyst Corporate came into being on September 6, 2011. Shortly thereafter Catalyst Corporate developed a new Private Placement Memorandum (PPM) for PCC that will allow additional credit unions to join as capitalizing members on an ongoing basis. To accompany this capital offering, the Business Plan has been updated to eliminate references to events that have already occurred, revise details that have changed, and confirm other information that was uncertain at the time the first plan was distributed. A significant development impacting the Catalyst Corporate Plan is its successful bid in late 2011 to acquire the operations of Western Bridge Corporate. The bid proposal was solicited by the NCUA in its pursuit of an optimal transition for former Western Bridge member credit unions after determining that sufficient capital would not be raised to 2 launch United Resources Corporate—the intended Western Bridge replacement. The NCUA announced that Catalyst Corporate had won the bid to acquire Western Bridge Corporate’s operations on December 14. Catalyst Corporate is the best solution for transitioning Western Bridge member credit unions for several reasons, including: numerous shared platforms and systems (such as the data processing and core item processing solutions), the ability to replace 100 percent of Western Bridge Corporate’s products and services, familiarity with the Western Bridge Corporate operations, proven scalability, and meaningful experience with corporate consolidation. The proposal calls for all Western Bridge Corporate products and services to be consolidated into Catalyst Corporate’s existing operations, systems, processes and account structures. The additional volumes arising from this transition, handled efficiently with appropriate additional resources, have a positive impact on the projected financial performance of Catalyst Corporate. Catalyst Corporate achieved well-capitalized status in October 2011, ahead of schedule, and is on track to meet all NCUA retained earnings and capital ratio requirements over the next 10 years. This consolidation and expansion will further accelerate achievement of future retained earnings requirements and will benefit all Catalyst Corporate members through greater flexibility for investing in new products and technologies to help natural person credit unions meet their own members’ needs. The time line for achieving the integration spans January-June 2012. 3 Background: Developing a Member Driven Solution In response to the market crisis and the sweeping losses sustained by corporates, as well as early intelligence about the likely changes to Regulation 704, the Boards of Directors and Management of Southwest Corporate and Georgia Corporate began to evaluate business models in late 2009. The corporates, working independently, shared an objective of identifying a strategy that would enable each to succeed in serving their members well into the future despite capital depletions. Both corporates relied on feedback from their respective membership in outlining the characteristics of a business model that would be successful and that credit unions would support. Georgia Corporate Annually, Georgia Corporate’s Board of Directors engaged in a robust strategic planning exercise, including an evaluation of environmental and operational factors and proposed responses to ensure successful future performance. In 2009, the Board recognized a need to expand this process to include a comprehensive assessment of the business model itself in order to address the significant loss of capital experienced during the year and the introduction of new, challenging regulatory provisions. The Board identified six potential business models for further analysis and directed management to engage member credit unions in the process of choosing a strategic direction that would provide the most value to Georgia Corporate’s current membership. By January 2010, three planning groups had been established. 1. Advisory Council – Comprised of CEOs of the seven largest credit unions in Georgia, the Advisory Council was established to ensure that requirements of the corporate’s largest depositors would be met. The seven credit unions represented on this council made up 72.00 percent of Georgia Corporate's deposits and generated a significant portion of its fee income. 2. Strategic Steering Committee – Comprised of senior executives (mostly CFOs) from the Advisory Council credit unions, the Steering Committee met frequently and was highly engaged in the planning process, suggesting additional business models for consideration and providing feedback on criteria and modeling assumptions over a period of six months. 3. Member Focus Group – The Member Focus Group was comprised of 15 representatives from credit unions ranging from $15 million to140 million in assets. This group provided feedback on the underlying assumptions driving the business model and Strategic Steering Committee recommendations. The Focus Group 4 offered a unique perspective from credit unions that are generally more dependent on Georgia Corporate for critical support. The first order of business for the Strategic Steering Committee was to establish objective criteria for use in ranking the numerous business model scenarios under consideration. Six Model Ranking Criteria were identified and defined. They were: • • • • • • Feasibility of Establishing the Structure Minimum Capital Investment Provides Economies of Scale (pricing/efficiencies) Provides Value to Members Allows for Migration to Off-Balance Sheet Investing Completeness of Product Offering After establishing and clearly defining all of the Model Ranking Criteria, the Strategic Steering Committee weighted them to ensure that appropriate consideration would be given to each in the final analysis. The Model Ranking Criteria also provided a useful framework for discussing the business model scenarios throughout the six-month process. Initially, the Advisory Council had requested an analysis of Georgia Corporate’s ability to operate profitably as a stand-alone entity by reducing the balance sheet size and brokering member deposits that exceed the minimum balance required for settlement. The analytical model demonstrated conclusively that due to a deep reduction in spread income and additional expenses associated with replacing vital U.S. Central services and support, the corporate would not be able to produce retained earnings sufficient to meet then-proposed NCUA regulatory targets. The Steering Committee turned its focus to business model scenarios that would incorporate consolidation in order to achieve the scale necessary to overcome these hurdles. The next phase of analysis examined several distinct consolidation scenarios: a regional corporate (merging together with existing partners in the region), a “hub and spoke” model (merge together several smaller “clean balance sheet” corporates, with Georgia Corporate as the primary headquarters), or merge with one or more corporates that already possessed a substantially larger infrastructure. Throughout the planning process, management was actively engaged in discussions with corporate credit unions throughout the nation, presenting a vision for collaboration and seeking avenues for partnership or merger to gain the efficiencies necessary for success. Most corporates generally were intrigued by the opportunities but were not ready to make commitments to a concrete strategy. Ultimately, further analysis demonstrated that the regional corporate and the hub-and-spoke model, while profitable, would fall short of NCUA capital targets over time. 5 The outcome of these discussions along with modeling results compelled the Strategic Steering Committee to focus on consolidation with one or more “Tier One” corporates – defined as a corporate that possesses significant scale and little reliance on U.S. Central. Potential partners were assessed based on efficiency (as measured by the coverage ratio which is the percentage of operating expense covered by fee income) and member service philosophy. Protection from legacy assets was acknowledged as a key criterion, though the ultimate resolution to this issue was not known at the time. By July 2010, Georgia Corporate’s Board of Directors had approved the Strategic Steering Committee’s recommendation to approach Southwest Corporate as the primary consolidation partner, along with the potential to include one additional Tier One corporate and two other regional partners – none of which ultimately committed to the plan. The first in-person meeting of the leadership of Georgia Corporate and Southwest Corporate was on September 2-3. This launched the process of integrating the financial models and projections of the two corporates, which were remarkably similar. Initiating these discussions early placed Georgia Corporate in an excellent position to continue working with Southwest Bridge Corporate’s management following conservatorship without losing momentum. On December 2, Georgia Corporate made an official announcement of its plan to consolidate with Southwest Bridge Corporate and to pursue a new, small-balance sheet business model with low member capitalization requirements. Southwest Bridge Corporate On September 30, 2010, Southwest Bridge Corporate held a membership update webinar and asked for volunteers to serve on the Member Advisory Council (“Council”). An update letter was distributed to all member credit unions on October 4, 2010 asking for volunteers to serve on the Council. Southwest Bridge Corporate received 141 volunteers from member credit unions and all were placed on the Council. On October 15, 2010, Southwest Bridge Corporate’s Member Advisory Council met to establish its mission, which was to advise credit unions of the best plan to transition Southwest Bridge Corporate’s entire operations to a new entity. The responsibilities of the Council were: • • • Explore future business models for Southwest Bridge Corporate with the end result being one that is in the best interests of member credit unions. Determine the best business model that aligns the interests of the members and provides sufficient value for credit unions to support. Recommend a plan of action to credit unions and based on their commitment, approach NCUA with a credit union recommended business plan for the future of Southwest Bridge Corporate. 6 • Promote the best option for Southwest Bridge Corporate among fellow credit unions. Several Southwest Bridge Corporate Council members volunteered to serve on an Executive Committee. The Council appointed a 13-member Executive Committee to provide direction to Southwest Bridge Corporate’s senior management team for the purpose of identifying and evaluating potential future business models. The Executive Committee determined that the primary objectives of the final business model will: • • • • • Provide a full menu of services to reduce the impact on Southwest Bridge Corporate’s members Require a lower level of capital contributed from member credit unions Keep credit union ownership and control Ensure competitive pricing with high quality service Maintain the capacity for ongoing aggregation The Executive Committee directed Southwest Bridge Corporate’s senior management to identify and evaluate future business models. At a subsequent meeting, the Executive Committee presented its findings and recommendations to the Council. In all, the Executive Committee met three times in October 2010 and November 2010 to review information and analysis of six potential business models and to discuss the strengths and weaknesses of each business model option. The six business model options reviewed by the Executive Committee were: • • • • • • Consolidate with a non-credit union entity(s) Consolidate with an existing CUSO(s) Establish a new regional CUSO Establish a new national CUSO Charter a new corporate credit union Consolidate with an existing corporate credit union After careful consideration the Executive Committee determined that the best future business model for Southwest Bridge Corporate was consolidation with an existing corporate credit union, namely, Georgia Corporate. The Executive Committee identified several key factors in the decision to pursue a consolidation with Georgia Corporate. These are: • • An existing federal charter that would expedite a transition from the bridge corporate No exposure to legacy assets 7 • • • • Eliminate potential product and system conversions for approximately 1,100 Southwest Bridge Corporate member credit unions that are service subscribers Improved operating efficiencies Governance structure that represents the Consolidated Corporate’s entire membership including the seven core states of Southwest Bridge Corporate Maintaining operations in Plano, Texas On November 30, 2010, a second Member Advisory Council meeting was held via webinar. At the meeting the Executive Committee presented its findings to the entire Council and issued a final business model recommendation. The business model recommendation included the following two components: • • Pursue a consolidation with Georgia Corporate. The consolidation likely will occur by July 2011 with capital raising initiatives in May or June 2011. Governance of the Consolidated Corporate will be comprised primarily of Southwest Bridge Corporate members and the new board of directors will select the new CEO. The headquarters and operations of the Consolidated Corporate will remain in Plano, Texas. The Council approved a capital formula of 0.25 percent of assets with a maximum cap of $750,000 for credit unions over $750 million, an intermediate cap of $600,000 for credit unions between $240 million and $750 million in assets, and a proportional threshold for credit unions $50 million or less in assets. The required capital is perpetual with no annual adjustment and is an investment that pays a dividend. The Council overwhelmingly approved the Executive Committee’s recommendations to pursue a consolidation with Georgia Corporate and to adopt the capital formula as outlined above. Of the 107 Council members that voted, 98 voted in favor of the recommendation. To solicit broader member credit union input on the Member Advisory Council’s recommended business model, two additional webinars were held in December, for which 240 credit unions were in attendance. The discussion included an overview of advantages and disadvantages of the six business models considered by the Member Advisory Council. The webinar also presented the member-contributed capital formula, details about the proposed product offerings, necessary balance sheet changes, the plan to consolidate with Georgia Corporate, and financial projections. Of the 240 member credit unions that attended one of the two webinars, 187 responded to a survey question asking them about their willingness to support the plan recommended by the Member Advisory Council. Of the 187 respondents, 133 (71.00 percent) responded “yes,” 11 (6.00 percent) responded “no,” and 43 (23.00 percent) responded “undecided.” 8 Subsequently, a Special Member Meeting was held in January 2011 to discuss the proposed business model for the future of Southwest Bridge Corporate. More than 230 member credit unions attended the meeting via webinar. After presentation of the plan details, member credit unions were asked to vote either through a ballot provided to them in advance or electronically during the session. Again, the member vote supported the new model and consolidation with Georgia Corporate as recommended by the Member Advisory Council. The results are as follows: 540 Votes cast = 39.0 percent of membership 493 Approve = 91.3 percent of votes cast 28 Do not approve = 5.2 percent of votes cast 19 Undecided = 3.5 percent of votes cast Finally, the Southwest Bridge Corporate membership voted explicitly to approve the planned merger with Georgia Corporate on August 3, 2011 date, with 98% of the 685 voting credit unions casting a ballot in favor. Western Bridge Corporate While Catalyst Corporate was coming together as the solution for Southwest Bridge Corporate and Georgia Corporate members, Western Bridge Corporate underwent a similar, member-driven planning process. The Western Bridge member advisory group established a plan to come out of bridge as an independent operation with a new charter, to be called United Resources Corporate Federal Credit Union. An Organizing Board of Directors, made up of credit union leaders who volunteered to sponsor the new charter, was named. The “Forward Together” business plan for United Resources described a model that was similar to that of Catalyst Corporate, including a lower capitalization requirement and small balance sheet, a focus on settlement and payments. By late summer 2011 Western Bridge had not received sufficient capitalization pledges to successfully launch United Resources Corporate—with $82 million in subscriptions from 264 members versus a stated goal of $200 million by August 31st. On September 1, the NCUA announced its contingency strategy for Western Bridge Corporate, inclusive of a competitive bid process whereby it hoped to attract a third party capable of acquiring the entire Western Bridge operation through a package transaction. After initial exploration, the NCUA announced that it would accept bids from four corporate credit unions, as corporates would provide the best opportunity to continue offering Western Bridge Corporate products and services without disruption. Bid proposals were due to the agency in early November following a brief due diligence period. Ultimately, the NCUA selected Catalyst Corporate as the acquirer, announced on December 14, 2011. Catalyst Corporate plans to work closely with Western Bridge Corporate staff, its member advisors, and the NCUA to ensure a successful transition by June 30, 2012. 9 CUNA’s Corporate Credit Union Working Group While corporates were working with membership planning groups to create strategies for the future, CUNA established a Corporate Credit Union Working Group to develop a consensus recommendation for the future of the Corporate Network. The CUNA Working Group delivered its official report on August 26, 2010, concluding that: • • • • Corporate services should be system owned and controlled by credit unions to ensure long-term value. Alternatives to corporates are available, but they are more costly and less service driven. Efficiency in the provision of corporate services is paramount, though substantial redundancies exist in Corporate Network. Fewer corporates, employing fewer staff, providing less local service, is a necessity if corporates will continue to be viable and valued providers of service. Since the report was delivered, just 16 months ago, the following events have occurred within the Corporate Network: • 2 mergers completed • 5 mergers pending • 2 self-liquidations • 2 involuntary liquidations In 2012, approximately 15 corporates will remain—representing very rapid progress toward achieving the vision set out by the CUNA Working Group. The consolidation of Catalyst Corporate and Western Bridge Corporate, in particular, will have a tremendous impact on improved efficiency that will benefit credit unions across the country, while adhering to the member-owned cooperative business model. 10 Organizational Overview Organizational Structure Catalyst Corporate’s headquarters are located in Plano, Texas, which facilitates seamless continuance of pre-consolidation product offerings and service levels with the management expertise and support of experienced professionals. In addition, Catalyst Corporate has a satellite office in Duluth, Georgia where six employees are charged with sustaining Georgia Corporate’s industry-leading market share through proven relationship management practices, and with expanding the Catalyst Corporate footprint throughout the southeastern region of the United States. Catalyst Corporate employs a team of member-facing staff in the Portland, Oregon area to support credit unions in Washington and Oregon, and has a senior account executive in Oklahoma. Plans include a local presence in California and Hawaii, made up primarily of member-facing staff, to serve new member credit unions added through its consolidation with Western Bridge Corporate. An organizational chart in Exhibit A provides an overview of the departmental structure. Management While the Board of Directors is conducting a national search to identify Catalyst Corporate’s new President/CEO, the corporate and its members benefit from the expertise of a team of experienced senior officials. Dianne Addington –President/Chief Executive Officer Dianne Addington is president/CEO of Catalyst Corporate, having been appointed by the NCUA to serve as chief executive of Southwest Bridge Corporate during the strategic planning process leading to the launch of Catalyst Corporate. With ultimate responsibility for fulfilling the corporate’s mission, Ms. Addington provides direction and leadership to Catalyst Corporate’s five senior executive officers in the achievement of the company’s strategy, goals and objectives. She also helps the Board of Directors accomplish its governance functions and is a member of Catalyst Corporate’s Asset/Liability Management Committee. Ms. Addington recently retired from Genisys Credit Union after 37 years of service, during which time she was president/chief executive officer for 22 years. She was a summa cum laude business graduate of Cleary College in December 1992. She received her masters of science degree in business administration from Central Michigan University in May 1998. Prior to retirement, Ms. Addington served on the Board of Regents for the Auburn Hills Campus of Baker College, the National Board of Directors for Credit Union Shared Branching, the National Board of Directors for Co-op Network, the Community Impact Committee for United Way of Southeastern Michigan, and the 11 Oakland County Committee for United Way. Throughout her career, Ms. Addington has served on multiple boards of directors and committees inside and outside of the credit union movement. Bruce Fox – Executive Vice President/Chief Investment Officer Bruce Fox joined Southwest Corporate Federal Credit Union in 1991. As executive vice president/CIO of Catalyst Corporate, Mr. Fox directs the asset/liability management, lending and investment management functions, and is responsible for the development of all balance sheet management and derivative strategies. Additionally, Mr. Fox is the operating principal for Catalyst Strategic Solutions (a corporate CUSO that is wholly-owned by Catalyst Corporate), which provides investment advisory services and asset/liability management reporting and consulting services to credit unions. Mr. Fox has been actively involved in the financial markets for more than 25 years. He is currently a board member of CU Business Group, LLC and CU Investment Solutions, LLC. Prior to joining Catalyst Corporate, he was an investment portfolio manager for Members Insurance Company in Dallas, Texas. He also worked in various capacities with two regional brokerage firms. Mr. Fox received a bachelor of business administration degree in finance and a master of business administration degree in finance, both from Texas A&M University at Commerce. He also holds NASD Series 7, 24, 27, 53, 63 and 65 licenses. He is a member of Catalyst Corporate’s Asset/Liability Management Committee and is the chairman of the corporate’s Member Loan Committee. Greg Moore – Executive Vice President/National Sales Greg Moore began working for Georgia Corporate Federal Credit Union in March 2002 as the president. CEO, and is now executive vice president of national sales for Catalyst. He is responsible for engaging credit unions, corporates, leagues, and other system participants throughout the country to forge mutually beneficial partnerships. As the chief executive of Georgia Corporate, Mr. Moore was actively engaged in transitioning the corporate into a full-service institution during his tenure. Mr. Moore guided Georgia Corporate through a visionary strategic planning process that culminated in development of a viable new business plan at the leading edge of the industry’s reconfigured value proposition—including a merger with Southwest Bridge Corporate. Mr. Moore is active in the credit union industry. He was instrumental in the establishment of Primary Financial, LLC and continues to serve on its board today. He is a member of the Association of Corporate Credit Union’s executive committee, and he previously served on U.S. Central’s board of directors and its supervisory committee. Prior to joining Georgia Corporate, Mr. Moore spent 16 years at U.S. Central in Kansas, where he held numerous positions 12 including portfolio manager, asset/liability; managing director, investment sales; and vice president, relationship management and member services. He has a bachelor's degree in business administration from the University of Kansas. Brad Ganey – Senior Vice President/Chief Operating Officer Brad Ganey joined Southwest Corporate in 2000 and has more than 25 years of experience in the financial services industry. As senior vice president/COO of Catalyst Corporate, he directs all payments-related services including Item Processing (IP), Electronic Payments, and Correspondent Services. In this capacity, Mr. Ganey oversees the corporate’s IP operations, support services, research/adjustments, IP projects/implementation, wire transfer, automated clearinghouse (ACH), remote deposit support, and card services (ATM/debit) operations. His responsibilities also include overseeing the member services, sales and marketing departments. Mr. Ganey is a board member of WesPay, a regional payments association. His background includes seven years in commercial banking where he served as an operations analyst and held various management positions in the item processing and cash management areas. Mr. Ganey was employed previously by the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta’s Jacksonville Branch, where he served in various management roles at the Branch and District level. He attended Jacksonville University, majoring in business administration. Brent Smith – Senior Vice President/Chief Risk Officer Brent Smith joined Southwest Corporate Federal Credit Union in 1990. He heads Catalyst Corporate’s risk management department, which evaluates the corporate’s investment, derivative, lending, item processing, and correspondent service activities. This department, using management control processes, safeguards the corporate’s resources and ensures compliance with regulation, policies and practices. Mr. Smith is also responsible for office services, which includes facilities. He is a member of Catalyst Corporate’s Asset/Liability Management Committee and its Enterprise Risk Management Committee. Previously he served as the chairman of the Compliance Clearing House Advisory Committee of the Association of Corporate Credit Unions and is currently a member of the North American Asset/Liability Management Association. Prior to his current position at Catalyst Corporate, Mr. Smith managed the asset/liability management, credit, and compliance functions at the corporate. He came to Southwest Corporate Federal Credit Union with extensive experience in portfolio management and in asset/liability management. He has held similar positions with American Federal Bank and Murray Federal Savings, both located in Dallas. Brent received his 13 bachelor’s and master’s degrees in economics from the University of North Texas, where he has taught microeconomics and money & banking. Melissa Wardell – Senior Vice President /Chief Financial Officer Melissa Wardell is responsible for the financial and accounting, human resources, and information technology departments of Catalyst Corporate. Included among her responsibilities are internal and external financial reporting, financial planning, payroll and benefits and all aspects of the technology activities of the corporate. Ms. Wardell is a member of Catalyst Corporate’s Asset/Liability Management Committee, Enterprise Risk Management Committee, and its Technology Steering Committee. Prior to becoming CFO in December 2006, Melissa served as Southwest Corporate Federal Credit Union’s Controller. Before joining Southwest Corporate in 1994, Melissa was a Senior Auditor for Price Waterhouse. Melissa received both her bachelor of science and master of science degrees from the University of North Texas, and she is a Certified Public Accountant. 14 Efficiency and Scalability Combining the back offices of corporate operations into the Catalyst Corporate headquarters is a primary driver of operational efficiency. As a result of the consolidation of Georgia Corporate and Southwest Bridge Corporate, along with business model refinements, the combined Catalyst Corporate expenses are substantially lower than what would have been required to operate the individual corporates previously. Further, consolidating Western Bridge Corporate’s operations will reduce operating expenses by 53 percent relative to running Catalyst Corporate and Western Bridge Corporate operations separately. Catalyst Corporate’s coverage ratio (the portion of expenses covered with fee income) is expected to range from 77-87 percent over the course of a conservative ten-year projection. This strong coverage ratio allows for limited reliance on the balance sheet for generating income, which reduces risk and ensures that Catalyst Corporate can maintain stable, competitive pricing. Further, the efficiency afforded by scale is perpetuated by close management of operating expenses, deployment of new technologies, and remaining focused on core competencies. When the initial capital raise was completed, management worked quickly to “right-size” Catalyst Corporate to match resources to the anticipated income stream and workload tied directly to capitalizing credit union volumes. The objective in doing so was to ensure that all future retained earnings goals necessary to achieve success would be met over time. Ultimately, the combined forces of Southwest Bridge Corporate and Georgia Corporate were reduced from 216 to 164 employees. Making these changes demonstrates a commitment to stewardship of member resources as well as years of experience in managing through the ebb and flow of volumes. Catalyst Corporate’s management has a firm grasp on the specific human resource requirements to ensure that its critical lines of business are handled safely and fully supported. As a result, its operations are highly scalable, whether changes occur through organic growth or further consolidation. Due to its scalable model Catalyst Corporate can effectively manage resources to maximize efficiency while still ensuring smooth payments operations as volumes increase. Presently, Catalyst Corporate has processing volumes that are substantially below proven capacity levels, as a result of attrition and a general decline in check usage. For example, Catalyst Corporate’s historical aggregate share draft payments volume for its highest month was approximately 34 million items. If 100 percent of Western Bridge Corporate’s current members choose to join Catalyst Corporate, the combined share draft payments volume would be approximately 22 million items, or 65 percent of the previous peak. It is estimated that a total of 207 employees will be required to successfully operate Catalyst Corporate following the integration of Western Bridge Corporate member credit 15 unions, assuming (conservatively) that all Western Bridge members are transitioned to Catalyst initially, and approximately 284 will capitalize and remain full-service users of the payment and settlement services. 16 Member Focus Just as important, Catalyst Corporate has people on the ground throughout the nation to ensure that it is capable of providing support to members at every level – including inperson engagement. The reductions in force that took place in 2011 did not have a negative impact on the proportion of member-facing staff, as it actually grew slightly from 48 percent to 50 percent. This proportional level of member-facing staff will be sustained following consolidation with Western Bridge Corporate as well—one of many ways Catalyst Corporate will ensure that Western Bridge Corporate members do not experience any diminishment to their service levels. See the organizational chart in Exhibit A for details regarding the disposition of staff. As a member-owned institution, Catalyst Corporate shares the credit union philosophy. Because this philosophy permeates the corporate culture, it is evident in everyday actions and decision-making as well as overarching strategies set by the volunteer Board of Directors. Members were the driving force behind the strategy to merge Southwest Bridge Corporate and Georgia Corporate, and to refine the business model in a way that achieves member-focused objectives, including continuity of service, a comprehensive range of products and services at competitive prices, and a lowered capital requirement. Members also made it clear that the corporate they would support with capital dollars should be positioned for future growth, including additional consolidation, to maximize the long-term value of ownership—an objective that the Board and management of Catalyst Corporate are already achieving through the acquisition of Western Bridge Corporate. In the future, Catalyst Corporate is committed to continuing this deep engagement with its members. In September Catalyst Corporate announced preparations to launch Catalyst Councils made up of credit union representatives from throughout the corporate’s national membership base. The feedback generated from these Councils will be used to make decisions about the use of corporate resources. They will focus on the areas of service and new products and enhancements. To ensure representative, active participation, Catalyst Corporate has developed organizing parameters: • • • • Three regional Councils: Eastern U.S., Central U.S. and Western U.S. 12 members per Council Asset group representation: o Under $50 million o $51 million-$150 million o $251 million-$750 million o Over $750 million Term limits 17 • An application process for considering the potential contributions of each interested party. By year-end 2011 it is anticipated that the Catalyst Councils will be in place and plans underway for the first meeting, slated to occur in the first quarter of 2012. As always, Catalyst Corporate staff will be readily accessible to members for outstanding operational support, while at the same time seeking opportunities to enhance outreach, such as through increased participation in chapter meetings, the establishment of a speakers’ bureau, and internal coordination of communication efforts among the memberfacing teams. Catalyst Corporate’s management will work closely with credit union leagues to coordinate efforts to support credit unions and leverage the events and relationships of one another. Catalyst Corporate’s satellite offices in Georgia and California as well as the geographically dispersed staff also will support the objective of consistent, high-quality outreach. 18 Governance In keeping with its corporate credit union charter, Catalyst Corporate’s Board of Directors is made up of members – senior officials from member credit unions – who represent the membership at large. During merger preparations it was necessary to establish a process that would ensure this objective could be met even though elections would not occur until the first annual meeting in 2012. After soliciting the membership of Southwest Bridge Corporate for volunteers, the Member Advisory Council’s Executive Committee identified a Governance Advisory Council (GAC) to recommend a slate of candidates for the Board of Directors and Supervisory Committee. The GAC met several times in early 2010 to contemplate and finalize its recommendation. Because the Georgia Corporate charter survived the merger, it was necessary for Georgia Corporate’s Board of Directors to appoint the Catalyst Board. The formal appointments took place at the first meeting following consolidation, on September 6, 2011, at which time all but one prior Georgia Corporate director resigned. The remaining director was Board Chairman Lin Hodges, who now serves as Catalyst Corporate’s Board Chairman. In accordance with the Bylaws, the corporate’s current Board of Directors will serve until the next Annual Meeting, at which time the positions will be open for member election. During this first meeting, the new Catalyst Board of Directors appointed the GACrecommended candidates to the Supervisory Committee. Other committees appointed included the Asset-Liability Committee and the Technology Steering Committee. Catalyst Corporate’s nine-member Board of Directors meets the objective of ensuring broad representation among members, with directors from eight states. Catalyst Corporate Board of Directors: Lin Hodges - Chairman President/CEO Associated CU Norcross, GA Ronald Johnston President/CEO Artesia CU Artesia, NM Bobbie Threlkeld President/CEO Baptist Health FCU Little Rock, AR Ayn Talley President/CEO Houston Police FCU Houston, TX Michael Hooper President/CEO La Capitol FCU Baton Rouge, LA Rick Hein President/CEO OSU FCU Covallis, OR Rod Taylor President/CEO Barksdale FCU Bossier City, LA Connie Cofer SVP Finance/CFO Communication FCU Oklahoma City, OK 19 John Papagano CFO Healthcare's Cooperative CU Jacksonville, FL Catalyst Corporate’s Supervisory Committee: Kerry Parker Candace Bracewell President/CEO SVP/CFO A+ FCU LGE Community CU Austin, TX Marietta, GA Catalyst Corporate’s ALCO: Rick Hein President/CEO OSU FCU Covallis, OR Sonya Jaynes CFO Red River EFCU Texarkana, TX Syed Dinar Vice President/CFO Texas Bay Area CU Houston, TX Craig Atkinson President/CEO Houston Highway CU Houston, TX Tony Budet President/CEO University FCU Austin, TX Staff Members of ALCO: Dianne Addington, Bruce Fox, Brent Smith, Melissa Wardell Catalyst Corporate Technology Steering Committee: Connie Cofer SVP Finance/CFO Communication FCU Oklahoma City, OK Jim Ladner SVP/CFO Resource One CU Dallas, TX Arna Reynolds President/CEO Amarillo Community FCU Amarillo, TX Staff Members of the Technology Steering Committee: Brad Ganey, Brent Smith, Melissa Wardell Continuing on this path, Catalyst Corporate’s Board of Directors plans to increase its number from nine to 11 members and appoint a Governance Advisory Committee to recommend candidates to represent additional western states – particularly executives from Western Bridge Corporate’s former member credit unions. Appointments will take place at the first official meeting of the Board of Directors following the targeted June 30, 2012 integration date. 20 Products and Services General Catalyst Corporate provides a broad range of wholesale financial products and support with the intent to maximize convenience and cost-effectiveness for its member credit unions. Though specific products evolve with environmental changes, offerings are generally categorized as payment services, correspondent services, settlement services, investments (including overnight investments, brokered certificates and marketable securities) and liquidity. Through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Catalyst Solutions, Catalyst Corporate offers asset-liability management tools and advisory services. Catalyst Corporate also has an ownership stake in Credit Union Business Group, which provides a turn-key solution for credit unions that offer business services to their own members. Product and service offerings are complemented by educational and training opportunities throughout the year. A complete listing of Catalyst Corporate’s products and services may be found in Exhibit B. Catalyst Corporate’s highly efficient business model enabled management to fulfill its pledge that, despite the aggressive earnings accumulation targets set out by the corporate’s business plan, members would see no changes in fees for 2012 (other than a very small number of pass-through charges from third-party partners). Catalyst Corporate is deeply committed to maintaining its competitive pricing structure and continuously seeks ways to improve the value and pricing offered to members. Changes to Investment Accounts Certain modifications to the investment products traditionally offered by corporate credit unions were necessary to enable Catalyst Corporate to fulfill new regulatory capital requirements. These include a ceiling on the balance that a member credit union can keep in its overnight investment account and the initial elimination of certificates of deposit. These limitations help to reduce Catalyst Corporate’s balance sheet size, which is imperative for achieving capital ratio targets. The cap on the Performance Tiered Account (PTA), which is Catalyst Corporate’s overnight investment account offering, was set initially at $1 million. Management determined the cap based on the amount of PCC raised in Catalyst’s first capital offering as well as a delay in the corporate’s ability to limit non-capitalizing credit unions’ use of the balance sheet prior to October 20, 2011. Adjusting the cap on the PTA from time to time will serve as the primary means of managing Catalyst Corporate’s balance sheet size, but will have an immaterial impact on member credit unions due to the employment of a daily sweep of 21 credit unions’ excess balances into the Federal Reserve’s Excess Balance Account (EBA). Funds above the cap are swept from the PTA automatically late each day and returned to the account the following morning. The EBA is a limited-purpose account established by the Federal Reserve Bank for maintaining the excess balances of institutions that are eligible to earn interest on balances held at the Fed. An EBA is managed by an agent (e.g., corporate credit union) on behalf of the participants (e.g., natural person credit unions that are members of a corporate credit union). Credit unions are not required to have an account at the Fed to participate in the EBA program. Balances held in the FRB Excess Balance Account are the liability of the FRB. In the future, Catalyst is expected to offer “As Agent” Fed Funds and a Money Market Fund as alternatives for moving excess balances out of the PTA. The “as agent” program will involve bulk trading of excess credit union liquidity, where overnight transactions are executed in the name of the credit union rather than the corporate. Fed Funds has historically been a large and active market with many creditworthy counterparties. The Money Market Fund will be managed by one or more highly regarded investment management firms. Each type of excess balance sheet alternative will perform better during specific phases of the business cycle, ensuring that credit union’s maximize the interest earned on excess funds. Lines of Credit Catalyst Corporate offers each of its capitalizing members a robust line of credit that exceeds other options in the market place in terms of both the amount and convenience of use. The amount of the line of credit is calculated using a formula that heavily weights the credit union’s settlement balances, ensuring that settlement needs will always be met. In addition to automatic loans used to cover settlement activity, Catalyst Corporate offers a range of options for maximizing the benefits of the line of credit, and accepts a variety of collateral types to secure these lines. Catalyst Corporate will also offer fixed and variable rate term loans. U.S. Central Products and Services The disposition of products and services traditionally offered by U.S. Central to corporate credit unions is not fully known. Catalyst Corporate uses several products and services provided by either U.S. Central or one of its corporate credit union service organizations (CUSOs). These services include: 1) cash concentration; 2) foreign check collection and international drafts; 3) international wires; 4) ACH; 5) auto settlement; 6) bill payment; 7) brokerage services; and 8) security safekeeping. 22 Industry Activity: The wholly-owned broker-dealer, Credit Union Investment Solutions, Inc. was purchased in September by a group of corporate users including Catalyst Corporate. As a result, member access to this highly-competitive, credit union-focused brokerage firm will not be interrupted. This CUSO’s name under its new ownership structure is CU Investment Solutions, LLC. On the correspondent and payments front, efforts to create a limited-purpose corporate to acquire certain products such as APEX-ACH and automated settlement did not succeed. Corporates continue working independently, and occasionally in concert, to devise solutions for offering these services to their own member credit unions in the future. Due Diligence on U.S. Central Replacement Options: Catalyst Corporate has transition plans to alternative payments solutions for all services previously provided by U.S. Central. The transition timelines allow for the conversion of all services in less than six months. Minimal impact on member credit unions is expected, and Catalyst Corporate does not anticipate materially higher costs. Below is a summary of Catalyst Corporate’s due diligence on alternative service payments products service providers. Foreign Check Collection and International Drafts – Approximately 105 credit unions are currently active in utilizing the foreign check collection services, with fewer than 25 credit unions actively utilizing international draft services. Three alternative vendors to U.S. Central have been evaluated, resulting in the selection of Travelex. Catalyst Corporate is actively working with Travelex to transition these services. International Wires – U.S. dollar (USD) international wires are currently processed though JP Morgan Chase with the exception of a small number of legacy Northwest Corporate credit unions and Georgia Corporate credit unions, which use U.S. Central’s ePD system. These credit unions can be transitioned to the JP Morgan Chase service, which leverages Catalyst’s existing TranZact system. Catalyst Corporate is currently working with JP Morgan Chase to transition processing of all FX international wire activity. ACH – The majority of credit unions contracting with Catalyst Corporate for ACH services utilize a combination of ACI, Momentum and internally-developed systems to accomplish this activity. Catalyst Corporate also supports credit unions that continue to utilize U.S. Central’s APEX-ACH system. Catalyst Corporate will continue to support the APEX-ACH solution if it is successfully transitioned to another service provider, thus providing its member credit unions with a choice of ACH solutions. 23 Catalyst Corporate has extensive experience converting credit unions from APEX and other systems to its alternative ACH solutions. In the event it becomes necessary to convert credit unions from U.S. Central’s APEX system, the corporate would follow its standard implementation procedures. Auto Settlement –Approximately 960 credit unions currently utilize Catalyst Corporate’s automated settlement services through U.S. Central. This is accomplished through U.S. Central’s contractual relationships with the participating originators who deliver files to x-Roads for processing. Catalyst Corporate receives auto-settlement files daily from x-Roads. In the event the U.S. Central service is discontinued, Catalyst Corporate will establish direct relationships and continue to receive files either through x-Roads or directly from the originator. Catalyst Corporate has experience with this process as it has managed a direct relationship with a local financial institution for a number of years. Catalyst Corporate has the capacity to expand this process and manage all existing relationships directly; however, the establishment of a direct relationship is based on each originator’s willingness to work with an individual corporate. If an originator is not willing to establish a direct relationship, Catalyst Corporate would work with its member credit unions and the vendor(s) to provide assistance in transitioning certain activity to an alternate settlement option, which is anticipated to be ACH. Bill Payment –Currently, 18 credit unions participate in electronic bill pay with Catalyst Corporate through Corporate Network eCom, a CUSO owned by U.S. Central. Catalyst Corporate anticipates that the bill pay products of eCom will continue to be offered through eCom or its successor through acquisition. Security Safekeeping – Catalyst Corporate has over 400 credit unions that utilize U.S. Central’s securities custodial services. . After conducting due diligence on four potential vendors, Catalyst Corporate has selected Alaska USA Trust Company to provide this service beginning in January 2012. Cash Concentration – Currently, 199 Catalyst credit unions utilize the Cash Concentration/ADT service processed through U.S. Central. In the event U.S. Central discontinues this service, Catalyst Corporate will work with credit unions to transition this activity to wires or ACH origination. 24 Capitalization Introduction The pre-merger Capital Plan included the issuance of $130 million in PCC—an amount sufficient to support a balance sheet of $2.6 billion. The financial projections that accompanied the Strategic Business and Capital Plan included scenarios for collecting more PCC (up to $180 million) and for collecting less (as low as $100 million). Ultimately, Catalyst Corporate was recapitalized with $93 million in PCC. Because this amount is less than what was presented in any of the original Business Plan scenarios, management reevaluated and recast financial projections to reflect a reduction in fee income, a lower level of overnight balances, and a smaller balance sheet of approximately $2.0 billion. These new projections, delivered to the memberships of Southwest Bridge Corporate and Georgia Corporate prior to the merger, also reflected substantial operating expense reductions that align the organization with the anticipated number of member credit unions, as well as other updated information. The revised projections demonstrated that changes to the original plan would not compromise capital compliance, product offerings, service delivery or pricing. More recently, the financial projections have been recast once again to account for the inclusion of Western Bridge members as users of Catalyst Corporate products, as depositors and as capital contributors. These conservative estimates project an average balance sheet of $3.0 billion and approximately $157 million in PCC. For details regarding the financial performance projections for Catalyst Corporate, see the “Financial Performance” section of this document. The Capital Plan is designed to maintain sufficient core capital to sustain a leverage ratio and risk-based capital ratios that exceed the minimum regulatory capital requirements for a well-capitalized corporate credit union. NCUA defines a well-capitalized corporate credit union as one that has attained a leverage ratio of 5.00 percent or greater, a total risk-based capital ratio of 10.00 percent or greater, and a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 6.00 percent or greater. Catalyst Corporate’s leverage ratio at the end of its first month of operations was 4.75 percent and rose to 5.01 percent as of October 31, 2011 – achieving well capitalized status ahead of schedule. Plan projections predict an increase to 5.71 percent by 2013, a total risk-based capital ratio well above 10.00 percent, and a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio that is substantially higher than 6.00 percent. The core capital (i.e., retained earnings and PCC) is expected to increase as retained earnings grow going forward. In December 2016, the projected leverage ratio is estimated 25 to be 5.28 percent and accumulated retained earnings are projected at 1.63 percent. The Consolidated Corporate’s tier 2 capital ratio (i.e., retained earnings and total PCC) is expected to be 6.77 percent in December 2016. Beginning in October 2016, certain regulatory capital rules will limit the amount of PCC that can be included in the leverage ratio, resulting in a decline in the leverage ratios in December of 2016. Over time, capital compliance will be more reliant on retained earnings and less dependent on membercontributed capital. Catalyst Corporate’s capital formula results in member capital requirements that are substantially less than what was required by Southwest Corporate and Georgia Corporate previously, and either less than or approximately equal to the requirement proposed by United Resources. Southwest Corporate had a 100 basis point requirement with a cap of $1 million, while Georgia Corporate used a range from 30 to 100 basis points with no cap. Catalyst Corporate ’s membership capital requirement is a maximum of 0.25 percent of assets and employs a cap to limit the overall contributions of larger credit unions to no more than $750,000, as well as a scale back provision for credit unions with assets under $50 million. United Resources also proposed a 25 basis point requirement, but had much higher caps for larger credit unions (up to $2.5 million) and no small credit union scale back provisions. More detail about the capital requirement may be found in Section C, “Issuance of Member Contributed Capital,” below. The Capital Plan of the Catalyst Corporate includes three primary components. They are: A. Smaller balance sheet B. Issuance of member-contributed capital (PCC) C. Controlling net operating expenses Catalyst Corporate’s proposed Capital Plan was developed to minimize the level of capital contributed by member credit unions. The lower proposed member-contributed capital requirements were structured with a goal of retaining pre-merger member credit unions and attracting additional credit unions to Catalyst Corporate following consolidation. A. Smaller Balance Sheet Transitioning to a smaller balance sheet is a key factor in Catalyst Corporate’s ability to meet regulatory requirements---a goal that has been achieved. As of November 30, 2010, the combined assets of Georgia Corporate and Southwest Bridge Corporate (now Catalyst Corporate) totaled $11.1 billion. The Business Plan updated financial projections include assets of $2.2 billion in the first month of consolidated operations, moving to $2.0 billion in 2012 as certificates continue to mature; however, Catalyst Corporate reached its $2.0 billion goal as of October 31, 2011. With the addition of Western Bridge Corporate member 26 deposits, assets are expected to approximately $3.5 billion in July 2012, before settling at $3.0 billion by year end, supported by $172 million in Total Capital. Catalyst Corporate was able to reduce its balance sheet as a result of several factors. These are: (i) the corporate’s liquidity position; (ii) the ability to decrease the size of member term share certificates and overnight share balances; and iii) a sweep service that transfers excess Performance Tiered Account (PTA) shares (i.e., daily share balances that exceed a predetermined cap) to the Federal Reserve Bank Excess Balance Account. Catalyst Corporate will be able to sustain its small balance sheet following the integration of Western Bridge members, as described below. Term Investments and Loans Catalyst Corporate and Western Bridge Corporate’s combined cash and cash equivalents as of November 2011 were approximately $7.5 billion or 90.0 percent of total assets. The structure of the corporates’ investment portfolios will provide the necessary flexibility to reduce the size of the combined balance sheet to approximately $3 billion. As of November 2011, Catalyst Corporate had approximately $850 million in securities, member term loans, and term certificates at U.S. Central. Western Bridge assets are primarily in overnight investments at the Federal Reserve Bank. The combination of this strong liquidity position and projected cash flows as a result of maturing term investments will facilitate a reduction in the size of the combined balance sheet sufficient to maintain compliance with regulatory capital ratios. Member Credit Union Shares As of November 2011, the outstanding member term certificates and overnight shares of Catalyst Corporate and Western Bridge Corporate totaled approximately $8.2 billion. This total included $500 million in member term certificates and $7.7 billion in overnight shares. Catalyst Corporate’s Capital Plan includes a significant reduction in member term certificates and the daily transfer of a significant portion of overnight shares to the Federal Reserve Bank Excess Balance Account in July 2012. Sweep Account Catalyst Corporate introduced a service to transfer excess shares in a member credit union’s overnight investment account (i.e., PTA) automatically to an off-balance sheet investment account. This sweep account function limits the amount of deposits a credit union can hold in its overnight investment account. Excess on-balance sheet overnight investment shares are transferred on a daily basis to the Federal Reserve Bank Excess Balance Account. The deposit cap of Catalyst Corporate’s overnight investment account is 27 currently $1 million. The periodic adjustment of this cap amount will be a key tool in Catalyst Corporate’s ability to maintain a reduced balance sheet size; however, it has minimal impact on members due to the convenient, automated sweep function. Off-balance Sheet Investment Options Catalyst Corporate plans to offer three types of off-balance sheet overnight investment options. They are: 1. Federal Reserve Bank Excess Balance Account 2. Money Market Funds 3. Fed Funds and Deposit Account Placement Each of these off-balance sheet products will allow member credit unions to transfer excess on-balance sheet shares automatically from their PTA and STA on a daily basis. At various stages of the market cycle, each of these programs program will outperform the others. Initially, the Federal Reserve’s Excess Balance Account program is the most competitive and accessible option. 1. Federal Reserve Bank Excess Balance Account Catalyst Corporate is currently participating in the Federal Reserve System’s Excess Balance Account (EBA) program. The EBA is a limited-purpose account at the Federal Reserve Bank established for maintaining the excess balances of financial institutions (i.e., credit unions) that are eligible to earn interest on balances held at the Federal Reserve Banks. The EBA permits the corporate to serve as agent when placing the credit unions’ excess balances at Federal Reserve Banks, following the completion of appropriate documentation between the corporate, the credit union, and the Federal Reserve. The balances in the excess balance account are assets of the credit unions, not Catalyst Corporate; therefore, balances in this account are not included in the corporate’s regulatory leverage ratio. Currently, the EBA program is the sole overnight off-balance sheet option for credit unions that choose to allow Catalyst Corporate to manage these funds on their behalf, though it is possible to manually transfer funds into and out of the PTA if desired. The Federal Reserve Bank’s excess balance account provides credit unions with access to an off-balance sheet overnight investment option that offers a competitive interest rate, with no credit or price risk. 2. “2a-7” Money Market Funds 28 Subject to receipt of regulatory approval, Catalyst Corporate will enter into a revenue sharing agreement with one or more institutional mutual fund facilities to offer “2a-7” money market funds to its member credit unions. The units of each money market fund will be limited to fund portfolios that are designed to qualify as eligible investments (i.e., treasury and agency guaranteed debt) for federally insured credit unions. The money market funds are expected to provide credit unions access to an offbalance sheet overnight investment option that will offer competitive interest rates, with no credit risk and a stable net asset value. 3. Fed Funds and Deposit Account Placement Catalyst Corporate also plans to offer member credit unions access to the Fed Funds market. Based on credit union authorization and agreement, the program will assist credit unions in placing overnight investments (i.e., Fed Funds sold and deposit accounts) in highly rated large regional and money center banks. The Fed Funds placement option is expected to provide credit unions access to an off-balance sheet overnight investment option that will offer competitive interest rates, with minimal credit and price risk. Figure A (in thousands) contains the Consolidated Corporate’s projected average member credit union share balances from July 2012 through December 2012. Catalyst Corporate was approved as an agent for the Federal Reserve Bank Excess Balance Account program in September 2011. July 2012 Aug 2012 Sept 2012 Oct 2012 Nov 2012 Dec 2012 Cash Management PTA/STA $ 2,600,000 $ 700,000 $ 2,400,000 $ 700,000 $ 2,200,000 $ 700,000 $ 2,100,000 $ 800,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 900,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 900,000 Total DANA $ 3,425,000 $ 3,215,000 $ 3,000,000 $ 2,990,000 $ 2,985,000 $ 2,980,000 Certificates $ 125,000 $ 115,000 $ 100,000 Figure A $ 90,000 $ 85,000 $ 80,000 B. Perpetual Contributed Capital (PCC) Issuance In accordance with its Capital Plan, Catalyst Corporate’s issued PCC as a means of raising tier one capital sufficient to meant the NCUA’s initial regulatory targets. The membercontributed capital formula was designed to maximize participation in the capital offering among existing member credit unions initially, and to attract other credit unions to Catalyst Corporate in the future. The capital formula incorporated feedback from member credit 29 unions that expressed a desire for a lower member-contributed capital requirement and a more proportional dollar requirement based on a credit union’s asset size. Capital Formula Catalyst Corporate’s membership perpetual contributed capital requirement is 0.25 percent of a credit union’s total assets as reported on its most recent year-end NCUA call report. The member-contributed capital requirement has two caps that limit the dollar amount of contributed capital for larger credit unions. A $600,000 cap for credit unions with $240 million to $750 million in assets and a $750,000 cap for credit unions with total assets greater than $750 million. Additionally, the member-contributed capital requirement includes a proportional threshold for credit unions with less than $50 million in assets. As an example, the membership requirement for a credit union with assets of $25 million would be 0.125 percent of assets or $31,250. The minimum member-contributed capital requirement is $500. The PCC is expected to pay a variable rate of interest based on the one-month LIBOR rate plus a margin of 0.50 percent. Dividends paid on PCC are subject to Catalyst Corporate meeting the minimum retained earnings requirements of NCUA’s final rule, with which the corporate is currently in compliance. The interest rate paid on PCC will reset each month and accrued interest on the PCC will be paid quarterly. A member is required to subscribe to PCC in order to access the on-balance sheet products and services of Catalyst Corporate; however, PCC is not required to utilize certain offbalance sheet services provided by the corporate or to utilize services provided by a CUSO owned by the corporate. Such off-balance sheet services include: i) investment advisory; ii) asset/liability management reporting; iii) broker/dealer; iv) insured certificate placement and custody (SimpliCD); and v) business lending services (Credit Union Business Group, LLC). Private Placement Memorandum Catalyst Corporate makes available to potential subscribers a detailed Private Placement Memorandum for PCC. This document provides details about the subscription process. C. Controlling Net Operating Expenses Catalyst Corporate’s business model was developed with the objective of building retained earnings by tightly controlling future operating expenses. This conservative approach began with an organization-wide review and assessment of the operating expense structure of the merging corporate credit unions. The process included a comprehensive review of current expenses and future costs in all functional areas. Management was able 30 to identify meaningful opportunities to reduce costs without reductions in product offerings or service levels. In the ongoing pursuit of this objective to build retained earnings, all Western Bridge existing products and services will be consolidated into Catalyst Corporate’s existing operations, systems, processes, account structures, and front-end systems (though Catalyst Corporate will maintain an office in California, primarily staffed with member facing personnel). In addition to consolidation, other strategic and operating changes will influence future expense reductions, such as: (i) maximizing operating efficiencies and managing selfsufficient product lines; (ii) maintaining a smaller and lower risk investment portfolio; and (iii) anticipating a smaller earning asset base. In total, Catalyst Corporate’s net operating expenses are projected to decline by $36.0 million in 2012 when compared to its predecessors’ (Southwest, Georgia and Western Bridge) combined 2010 net operating expenses. The projected reduction in net operating expenses will result in maximized efficiencies and growth in undivided earnings. Catalyst Corporate’s operating philosophy will continue to center on maintaining a cost efficient operation. One such measure that validates this commitment is Catalyst’s low net operating expense. Net operating expense is calculated by subtracting fee income from total operating expenses. Since 2007, net operating expenses of Catalyst Corporate’s predecessor corporates have declined $59.5 million (84.00 percent) to a forecast of $11.6 million in 2012. Additional planned decreases in net operating expenses are projected in 2011 and 2012 before leveling off at approximately $5 million. The corporate’s historical and projected net operating expenses are illustrated in Figure B. 31 Net Operating Expense (NOE) $80,000,000 $70,000,000 $60,000,000 $50,000,000 $40,000,000 $30,000,000 $20,000,000 $10,000,000 $0 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Catalyst Corporate & Western Bridge - NOE (Actual) Western Bidge - NOE (Actual) Catalyst Corporate - NOE (Actual) Catalyst Corporate (Forecast) 2013 2014 2015 Figure B As indicated, net operating expenses of Catalyst Corporate are projected to remain below levels experienced in 2004. Catalyst Corporate’s projected performance in managing net and total operating expenses is a result of: i) minimal growth in compensation through continued efficiencies gained from item processing; ii) efficiencies gained from the consolidation of three corporate credit unions; and iii) fee income growth from off-balance sheet investment transactions. D. Summary Catalyst Corporate’s Capital Plan builds on the successful achievement of previously established objectives including a capital raise of approximately $96 million (as of November 2011) in PCC, operational consolidation of Southwest Bridge Corporate and Georgia Corporate, balance sheet reduction to $2.0 billion through implementation of the Federal Reserve’s EBA, and reduction in operating expenses---steps that were implemented successfully in 2011. The updated plan encompasses five primary components. They are: • • • • • Issuing $62 million in new PCC to Western Bridge members Consolidating the existing operations of Catalyst Corporate and Western Bridge Corporate to improve operating efficiencies Maintaining a $3 billion balance sheet Pursuing a renewed focus on fee income derived from payment services and offbalance sheet investment services Controlling net operating expenses All of these objectives have been accomplished or are underway. This success underscores management’s belief that the proposed Capital Plan is prudent and realistic given the challenging economic and operating environment anticipated in 2012 and beyond. The 32 plan was designed with the objective of managing through such a challenging operating environment while continuing to serve the needs of the members and achieving earnings and capital goals. 33 Business Plan Status In the short period of time since the distribution of the Strategic Business and Capital Plan in March 2011, many of the objectives of the plan issued earlier in the year have been met. Others are well underway. 1) Consolidation of Southwest Bridge Corporate and Georgia Corporate operations The financial and operational consolidation of the two corporates was consummated successfully on September 6, 2011. 2) Formation of a scalable, low-cost provider of products and services strategically positioned to increase product and service volumes The organization as described was formed effectively with the merger on September. The corresponding reduction in force reflects the scalability of the model. In the first month of operations, Catalyst Corporate’s earnings were $637,851 vs. the $77,106 that was budgeted, and the coverage ratio was in excess of 100%. (This performance was an anomaly due to unforeseen one-time events). The coverage ratio for the first two months of operations averaged 96 percent versus a projection of 83.2 percent, and return on assets was .28 percent compared to the forecast of .07 percent. Further, member pricing for 2012 was announced and, as predicted, no price increases (other than third party partner pass-throughs) were included. 3) Creation of a smaller balance sheet and lower member-contributed capital requirements Catalyst Corporate launched successfully on September 6, 2011 with $93 million in contributed capital, which reflected the substantially lower capital requirements communicated in the PPM. The balance sheet was effectively reduced with the implementation of sweep functionality and use of the Federal Reserve’s EBA program. In the first month of operations, Catalyst Corporate’s DANA was: $2.19 billion v. the $2.22 billion in the Business Plan. 4) Limited deposit access to overnight investment accounts The Federal Reserve’s EBA program was implemented successfully just prior to the merger date and has achieved the objective of dramatically reducing the size of Catalyst Corporate’s balance sheet while ensuring members continue to enjoy onestop access for their investible funds. 34 5) Restricted issuance of share certificates Since the dissemination of the original Strategic Business and Capital Plan, share certificate balances have decreased from $1.6 billion to $450 million as certificates have matured. 6) Potential transition from U.S. Central products and services CU Investment Services, LLC was formed and capitalized by a group of corporate credit unions, including Catalyst Corporate, ensuring that member credit unions will continue to have access to this competitive, credit union-focused broker-dealer. While U.S. Central’s payment products and services remain fully accessible at present, Catalyst Corporate has performed extensive due diligence on alternatives and is poised to offer an alternative for 100% of the current U.S. Central product line. 7) Issuance of member-contributed capital (PCC) Catalyst Corporate launched with $93 million in member-contributed PCC, which is deemed sufficient to support its $2.0 billion balance sheet and reflects a 77 percent recapitalization rate. Catalyst Corporate anticipates reaching at least $156.7 million in PCC by June 30, 2012. Looking ahead: The Board of Directors of Catalyst Corporate was seated on September 6, 2011. Among its many accomplishments, the Board has achieved numerous plan objectives including appointing committees, purchasing the Catalyst Corporate headquarters from the asset management estate, and hiring a search firm to identify a new president/chief executive officer. This new chief executive is expected to be in place by early 2012. Catalyst has also developed a new PPM for PCC and is actively engaging with credit unions that are seeking alternatives to their previous service providers, including corporates whose efforts to recapitalize were unsuccessful. In 2012, Catalyst Corporate will focus on i) deepening relationships and market share with existing members, and will actively seek member engagement through Catalyst Councils and other outreach activities and ii) successful integration of Western Bridge Corporate’s member credit unions concurrent with a successful capital offering. The time line for this integration is as follows: 35 o January 2012: Town Hall Meetings will take place throughout states with large concentrations of Western Bridge Corporate member credit unions, including California, Nevada, Washington, Oregon and Hawaii. o January 2012: Western Bridge Corporate member credit unions will receive a Private Placement Memorandum for Perpetual Contributed Capital along with abundant support materials. o March 31, 2012: Capital commitments are due to Catalyst Corporate. o March-April 2012: Catalyst Corporate will work with credit unions to prepare documentation for establishing Excess Balance Account relationships with the Federal Reserve. o June 30: All transitions are slated to be complete with full operational integration. 36 Financial Performance Model Balance Sheet (Investment Portfolio with Normal Interest Rates) A model portfolio was created to calculate net interest income to use in the financial projections presented in this Strategic Business and Capital Plan. The model portfolio presents an illustration of a potential asset allocation of Catalyst Corporate. The model represents a more liquid, lower risk balance sheet that should reduce member-contributed capital’s exposure to systemic risk. Exhibit C contains an illustration of a model balance sheet for Catalyst Corporate that is in compliance with the final NCUA Rules and Regulations Part 704. The asset allocation is structured so that it is in compliance with the investment, ALM, and liquidity provisions of Part 704. Characteristics of the asset allocation that results from such compliance are as follows: • • • • • • All assets have a NRSRO rating of AA or better. No prohibited securities are in the portfolio. All sector allocations are met. All interest rate risk NEV tests are satisfied. The portfolio has a weighted-average life (WAL) of 1.32 years, which is below the 2.0 year limit in Part 704. The portfolio’s WAL extends to 1.55 years, well below the 2.25 year limit required by Part 704. The model portfolio assets are allocated across seven discrete asset classes: i) member loans; ii) automobile asset-backed securities (ABS); iii) credit card ABS; iv) FFELP student loan ABS; v) agency mortgage-backed securities; vi) corporate debt obligations; and vii) agency debt. No single non-agency investment asset sector comprises more than 8 percent of assets. The model portfolio includes 41.00 percent in short-term overnight investments. The projected rate on interest earned on overnight investments is Effective Fed Funds minus 2 basis points or one-month LIBOR minus 12 basis points. The model portfolio’s overnight investments are held in excess reserves at a Federal Reserve Bank. Currently, the rate of interest paid on excess reserves is 25 basis points. At some point in the future, it is likely that the Federal Reserve Bank will discontinue paying an interest rate on excess reserves. Catalyst Corporate’s plan will be to reallocate its overnight investments to other short-term money market instruments. These money market instruments may include: i) repurchase agreements; ii) bank money market savings accounts (bank deposits); iii) Treasury and agency money market funds; iv) Fed Funds sold; and v) commercial paper. 37 All of the liabilities of the model portfolio are allocated to overnight shares. Initially, Catalyst Corporate is not expected to offer term certificates to its members because of the need to closely manage its assets and achieve the three capital requirements of Part 704. All existing member certificate balances are in a run-off mode. The model portfolio’s pricing of overnight shares (i.e., Cash Management and PTA) is consistent with the share pricing procedures used by Catalyst Corporate and its predecessors since 2006. The model portfolio uses current spread over LIBOR (as of December 17, 2010) for each asset class with the exception of member loans. The source for spread over LIBOR for the five securities asset classes was J.P. Morgan Securities LLC. The spread over LIBOR for member loans represents historical loan pricing guidelines used by Catalyst Corporate and its predecessors. The model portfolio’s net interest income (NII) was calculated using two distinct interest rate scenarios including a low interest rate environment (i.e., 25 basis point Fed Funds) and a more normal rate environment (i.e., > 125 basis point Fed Funds). The distinction between the two interest rate scenarios is significant and results in a material difference in the NII generated in the model portfolio. As an example, the projected NII in the low interest rate scenario is approximately 26 basis points compared to a NII of approximately 55 basis points for the model portfolio in a normal interest rate scenario. 38 Financial Projections The base case scenario Exhibit D represents Catalyst Corporate’s projections of the most likely future financial results. The base case scenario includes total PCC of $158 million and $3.0 billion in DANA. Two key assumptions in the base case scenario include the future change in the Fed Funds rate and the expected retention rate of Western Bridge members. The base case scenario assumes that future changes in the Fed Funds rate are based upon current market consensus (i.e., Fed Funds futures). Currently Fed Funds are expected to remain at 25 basis points until December 2013. The future level of Fed Funds is the most relevant determinant of Catalyst Corporate’s future net interest income. The base case scenario includes an assumption related to the number of Western Bridge members that will capitalize and continue to use Catalyst Corporate payment services. Specifically, the base case scenario assumes the 80 percent of Western Bridge members that subscribed to United Resources’ capital offering will capitalize and retain payment and correspondent services with Catalyst Corporate. The base case scenario also assumes that an additional 10 percent of Western Bridge members that did not subscribe to United Resources’ capital offering will purchase PCC with Catalyst Corporate. In total, Catalyst Corporate’s base case scenario includes $62 million in new PCC from Western Bridge members. Net income is projected to vary from approximately $6.0 million to $11.0 million over the nine-year period (2012–2020), with a Return on Assets (ROA) ranging from 19 basis points to 37 basis points. Projected net income (ROA) in 2012 and 2013 is 20 basis points and 19 basis points, respectively. The net income projections are a result of lower projected net interest income as a consequence of low short-term interest rates. The year-end leverage ratio and retained earnings are projected to increase significantly from 2012 to 2020 based on a $3.0 billion balance sheet. At year-end 2012, Catalyst Corporate’s leverage ratio and retained earnings ratio are projected to be 5.61 percent and 0.36 percent, respectively. At Year-end 2013, Catalyst Corporate’s projected leverage ratio is 5.71 percent and its accumulated retained earnings are 0.55 percent. Catalyst Corporate’s Tier 1 and total risk-based capital ratios are expected to significantly exceed 6.00 percent and 10.00 percent, respectively. Under NCUA Rules and Regulations Part 704, a corporate credit union with a leverage ratio that exceeds 5.00 percent is considered well capitalized. The 55 basis points of retained earnings exceed the regulatory target of 45 basis points in 2013. 39 Catalyst Corporate’s base case financial projections include a leverage ratio of 5.28 percent in 2016 and 6.26 percent in 2020, and accumulated retained earnings of 163 basis points in 2016 and 311 basis points in 2020. Catalyst Corporate’s core capital ratio (i.e., retained earnings and PCC) is projected to be 6.77 percent in 2016 and 8.25 percent in 2020. Fee income is projected to remain relatively flat over a 9-year period due to a number of factors. These factors include continued growth in off-balance sheet fee income from investment advisory, securities brokerage, and SimpliCD. Off-balance sheet fee income is projected to increase at an average annual rate of 3.50 percent from 2012 through 2020. Fee income growth from off-balance sheet services is offset by continued industry-wide reduction in check volumes and related fee income. Fee income from payment and correspondent services is projected to decline at an average annual rate of 1.50 percent from 2012 through 2020. 40 Exhibit A Catalyst Corporate’s Organizational Chart 41 Exhibit B Catalyst Corporate’s Products and Services CARD SERVICES ATM Card Program ATM Terminal Driving CO-OP ATM Network Access Debit Card Program Merchant Card Services LENDING SERVICES CLF Loan Letters of Credit Lines of Credit Reverse Repurchase Transactions Term Loans COMMUNICATIONS Electronic and print newsletters Economic News Investment Updates Product and Operational training PAYMENT SERVICES ACH Contingency Services ACH Origination ACH Receipt ATM Capture Automated Settlement Bill Pay Branch & Teller Capture Business ACH Origination Business Capture Cash Concentration & Auto Transfer Corporate Share Drafts Explicit Float Fraud Protection – The DEPOSIT CHEK® Image Deposit Returns Imaged Share Draft Processing International ACH Lockbox Processing Member Capture Mobile Capture TranZact (Online account manager) Western Union Wire Transfer CORRESPONDENT SERVICES Domestic Collections International Check Collection International Currency Service International Drafts Reg. D Reserve Funding INVESTMENT SERVICES Advisory Services ALM Services Brokerage Cash Management Fund Performance Tiered Account Perpetual Contributed Capital Account Security Safekeeping SimpliCD Program 42 Exhibit C Catalyst Corporate’s Model Balance Sheet Asset Average Life 1.32 Net Interest Income (bps) 54.7 43 Exhibit D Catalyst Corporate’s Financial Projections Daily Average Net Assets MCS- on notice (unamortized) Perpetual Contributed Capital Retained Earnings Total Tier 2 Capital Net Interest Income Net Fee Income Payment/Correspondent Fee Income - Off Balance Sheet Operating Expense Net Income Net Operating Expense Net Interest Margin Coverage Ratio Return on Assets Retained Earnings Ratio Leverage Ratio Total Tier 2 Capital Ratio 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2020 $ 3,008,774 3,662 157,744 10,866 172,272 $ 3,000,000 157,744 16,500 174,244 $ 3,000,000 157,744 27,348 185,092 $ 3,000,000 157,744 37,719 195,463 $ 3,000,000 157,744 48,758 206,502 $ 3,000,000 157,744 93,338 251,082 $ $ $ 9,873 19,983 6,452 30,332 5,975 $ $ 3,898 $ 0.33% 87% 0.20% 0.36% 5.61% 5.61% 10,500 20,344 7,317 32,528 5,634 $ $ 4,866 $ 0.35% 85% 0.19% 0.55% 5.71% 5.69% 18,000 18,766 7,492 33,410 10,848 $ $ 7,152 $ 0.60% 79% 0.36% 0.91% 6.07% 6.05% 18,000 18,551 7,492 33,672 10,371 $ $ 7,629 $ 0.60% 77% 0.35% 1.26% 6.42% 6.40% 18,300 18,394 7,998 33,653 11,039 $ $ 7,261 $ 0.61% 78% 0.37% 1.63% 5.28% 6.77% 18,600 17,664 8,695 33,900 11,059 7,541 0.62% 78% 0.37% 3.11% 6.26% 8.25% Notes: 1) Financial projections are based on a calendar year and assume a Purchase & Assumption date of June 30, 2012 for Western Bridge operations. Revenue and expenses related to servicing Western Bridge members begin in July 2012. 2) Base-case projections assume that 80% of the credit unions that originally agreed to purchase PCC from United Resources and 10% of the remaining credit unions that did not agree to capitalize United Resources will capitalize Catalyst. This results in 284 credit union members and $62 million in additional PCC. This would increase Catalyst capitalized credit union members from 865 to 1,149. 3) Base case projections assume 42 FTEs added to support Western Bridge operations. Approximately 12 will be located in California/Hawaii for member facing needs and the remaining will be located in Plano for back-office operations. Western Bridge staff will have the opportunity to apply for all open positions at Catalyst Corporate. 4) Catalyst Corporate will implement the EBA program from Western Bridge members to ensure excess balances are swept into the EBA program to maintain well capitalized status. 5) Base case projections assume Fed Funds rate remain flat throughout 2013. This results in a more conservative forecast than the original business plan. 6) Catalyst Corporate is projected to be a well-capitalized corporate with a leverage ratio over 5% at all periods. Catalyst corporate will also meet regulatory retained earnings hurdles in 2013, 2016 and 2020. 44
© Copyright 2024