The Honorable James Hunter III Moot Court Program 2014–2015 The 25th Anniversary Competition Final Arguments Tuesday, April 7, 2015 4:00 p.m. Courtroom 5D Mitchell H. Cohen U.S. Courthouse, Camden, New Jersey 2014–2015 James Hunter III Moot Court Board Gloria Melunis Hunter Board Chairs: Jennifer Houghton Brian McGinnis Yasha Shahidi Erika Page Samuel Pellegrino Steven Zagorski Faculty: Prof. Ruth Anne Robbins Prof. Jenean Kirby Page1 Benjamin Hartwell Neil Hlawatsch Melissa Martinez The 2014–2015 James Hunter III Moot Court Students Defendant/Appellant Candied Adventures Plaintiff/Appellee Molly Kemery Max Bernstein & Aaron Creuz**** Megan Admire & Caitlin Costello*** Miranda Browne & May Wedlund Greg Console & Andrew Schwerin Linwood H. Donelson III & Colleen Gardner** Sarah Cutuli & Samantha Heaton* Mark Fanelli & Rachel Santitoro Katherine Daniel & Jesse Posey John Gazzola & Nicholas Stevens* Kelley Keane-Dawes & Melanie Lacey* Matthew Garber & Jarrod Welsh Sean Fulton & Jaclyn Palmerson**** Dominic Giova & Brielle Kovalchek*** Scott Isaacson & Aubrey Weaver Roy Gordon & Chris Green* Jason Kanterman & Max Noveli Grady Lowman & Eddie Park Jessica Lentini & Leigh Kelsey O’Donnell** Jason Premus & Melissa Valladares** Brendan McDonnough & Laura Rossi** *Hunter’s Dozen **Quarter-finalist ***Semi-finalist ****Finalist Defendant/Appellant Candied Adventures Plaintiff/Appellee Molly Kemery John Gazzola & Nicholas Stevens Sara Cutuli & Samantha Heaton Max Bernstein & Aaron Creuz Katherine Daniel & Jesse Posey Melissa Valladares & Jason Premus Jason Kanterman & Max Novelli Page2 2014–2015 Best Briefs In Dedication to the Honorable James Hunter III This annual moot court competition at Rutgers School of Law–Camden is dedicated to the memory of Judge Hunter, who served on the Third Circuit of the United States Circuit Court of Appeals, from November 10, 1971 until his passing on February 10, 1989. A life-long resident of South Jersey, Judge Hunter attended Temple University and The University of Pennsylvania Law School before becoming a partner in the Haddonfield firm of Archer, Greiner, Hunter & Read (now Archer & Greiner). Additionally, prior to his appointment to the bench on November 10, 1971, Judge Hunter was a Major in the Marine Corps, serving in combat in World War II. Judge Hunter’s family, friends, former law clerks and the law firm of Archer & Greiner saw it fit to preserve the Judge’s legacy in the Rutgers–Camden annual moot court competition. As both an attorney and member of the New Jersey bench, Judge Hunter stood for many things, but it was his interest in the development of young attorneys, evidenced through his keen interest in his law clerks, that made this competition a fitting memorial. Those who dedicated this competition in the Judge’s honor wished it to stand for many of the same goals that Judge Hunter supported throughout his career. Their support allows them, as well as fellow members of the bench and bar, to pay tribute to his great legacy while furthering the development of the legal profession, as he would have wanted. We take this opportunity to show our gratitude to Judge Hunter’s family and friends as well as the many gracious donors that help make this competition possible. A note about the name “Garwood” in the use of the simulation. Ann Viskovich Garwood, 1918–2012, was the longtime administrative assistant to Judge Hunter. Mrs. Garwood was born and raised in Camden, and her graduation from Camden Catholic was the first high school diploma in her Croatian immigrant family. She began working with Judge Hunter in 1954, when he was a partner at Archer, Greiner, Hunter & Read. Judge Hunter asked her to accompany him when he joined the Third Circuit in 1971. She continued as his secretary until his death in 1989. Their professional relationship of over thirty-five years was characterized by mutual respect, disguised by teasing and humor. Judge Hunter called her "Mrs. Garbleword," and canonized her husband Mr. Frank "Bud" Garwood as "St. Bud" for staying married to her for fifty-three years. Mrs. Garwood was proud and very fond of Judge Hunter, his wife Jane, and their many law clerks ("kids") and interns ("moppets"). After Judge Hunter's death, Mrs. Garwood religiously attended this moot court competition named in his honor. She was accompanied by her granddaughter, Rutgers Law alumna, D.A.G. Kristen Harberg, herself a Hunter moot court participant. This year marks the 25th anniversary of the Hunter moot court program and the Board would like to welcome back many past Hunter alumni and judges to celebrate this noteworthy occasion. Page3 Beginning in 2012, the same year as her passing, our simulation includes the name “Garwood” in some way. This year, we have named the high school that our Plaintiff, Molly Kemery attended the “Anne Garwood Memorial High School,” in tribute (the extra “e” on the name “Anne was deliberate). Welcome from the 2014–2015 Hunter Moot Court Board Welcome to the final argument of this year’s Honorable James Hunter III Moot Court Competition. Since 1998, this Competition has been dedicated to training upper-level law students in advanced written and oral advocacy. Under the umbrage of Rutgers School of Law– Camden’s innovative and nationally-recognized lawyering program, the Hunter Moot Court Competition stands as one of the most advanced intramural competitions in the country. This program began over the summer, with many board members meeting with our supervising faculty to draft the simulation. By mid-September, we had drafted the largest Hunter record ever, over 120 pages of trial transcripts, exhibits, amusement park schematics, and other documents. The simulation begins with a lower court (the trial court) finding in favor of the plaintiff, Molly Kemery. The Hunter students then pick up where the simulation leaves off, and they are responsible for completing the appeal of the lower court holding. This past fall, after competing for one of the seats in the year-long course, students, in teams of two, wrote a complex appellate brief on the below-summarized legal issues. The students then progressed to the spring semester’s oral advocacy course and competition. Through work with the course Professors and Board Members, these students honed their oral advocacy abilities and began the competitive rounds, which culminate in tonight’s final argument. To the participants, many thanks for the diligent work, dedication, and commitment to this challenging competition. We have been extremely impressed with all participants, and wish you the best in all future endeavors. The guest judges in our competition have been illustrious and we are extremely honored by their commitment to judging. Our guest judges have included federal and state judges, federal and state judicial law clerks, private practitioners at large, medium, and small firms, Assistant U.S. Attorneys, attorneys at the New Jersey Attorney General’s office, public defenders and prosecutors, in-house counsel at large and publicly traded companies, and of course, dedicated members of our own faculty. Some of our guest judges are also alumni and former members of the Hunter Moot Court program. To each of them, we say thank you. Finally, the Hunter Board would like to thank Professors Ruth Anne Robbins and Jenean Kirby for constructing and teaching a challenging—and highly beneficial—curriculum and simulation. We have been honored to work with the professors in helping these outstanding students develop into the successful writers and advocates that they are today. From all of us on the 2014–15 Hunter Moot Court Board Gloria Melunis Erika Page Samuel Pellegrino Yasha Shahidi** Steven Zagorski ** Hunter Board Chairs Page4 Benjamin Hartwell Neil Hlawatsch Jennifer Houghton** Melissa Martinez Brian McGinnis** UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT __________________________________________________________________ No. 14-0916 __________________________________________________________________ Candied Adventures Defendant-Appellant v. Molly Kemery, Plaintiff-Appellee ____________________________________________________________________ Final Round Attorneys For the Appellant: Max Bernstein & Aaron Creuz For the Appellee: Sean Fulton & Jaclyn Palmerson Guest Panel The Honorable Theodore A. McKee Chief Judge, United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit The Honorable Stuart J. Rabner Chief Justice, New Jersey Supreme Court The Honorable Marjorie O. Rendell United States District Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Page5 4:00 pm: Guests and participants assemble. 4:15 pm: Final round arguments begin in Courtroom 5D 6:00 pm: Reception in the Multipurpose Room. Located in the Student Center of the Rutgers University Camden – Campus Our Guest Judges The Honorable Theodore A. McKee Chief Judge, United States District Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Judge Theodore A. McKee is the current Chief Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in Philadelphia. Judge McKee joined the Third Circuit in 1994, after being nominated by President Bill Clinton. In 2010, he succeeded Judge Anthony Scirica to become Chief Judge. Prior to joining the Third Circuit, Judge McKee served on the Court of Common Pleas in Philadelphia and as a lecturer at Rutgers School of Law-Camden. He has also held various other positions in both the public and private sector. Judge McKee remains actively committed to public interest work and currently serves on the board of several nonprofit organizations, including Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University, and City YearGreater Philadelphia. Judge McKee received his J.D. magna cum laude from Syracuse University College of Law in 1975. The Honorable Marjorie O. Rendell United States District Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Judge Marjorie Osterlund Rendell, a cum laude graduate of the University of Pennsylvania, received her Juris Doctor degree from the Villanova University School of Law in 1973. Upon graduation from law school, she joined the law firm of Duane, Morris & Heckscher, where she subsequently became the firm’s second woman partner. Over the course of her 20-year career as a practicing attorney, she specialized in bankruptcy law and commercial litigation, served as a mediator for the United States District Court and was a frequent speaker at law-related seminars and panels. Inducted as a judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania in March of 1994, Judge Rendell was elevated to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in November of 1997. She is a past Chair of the United States Judicial Conference Committee on the Administration of the Bankruptcy System. Judge Rendell is the Chair of the Third Circuit Bankruptcy Committee and a member of the Third Circuit Judicial Council Executive Committee. Judge Rendell became the 43rd First Lady of Pennsylvania when her husband, Governor Edward G. Rendell, was sworn in as Governor of Pennsylvania on January 21, 2003. Page6 The Honorable Stuart J. Rabner Chief Justice, New Jersey Supreme Court Chief Justice Stuart Rabner is the eighth chief justice to lead the New Jersey Supreme Court since the 1947 state constitution. Chief Justice Rabner graduated summa cum laude from the Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs at Princeton University in 1982. He graduated cum laude from Harvard Law School in 1985. He was a law clerk to U.S. District Court Judge Dickinson R. Debevoise before joining the U.S. Attorney's Office in Newark in 1986. Chief Justice Rabner began his career at the United States Attorney’s Office, serving as first assistant U.S. attorney, then as chief of the Terrorism Unit in the office of the U.S. Attorney for the District of New Jersey. Prior to his nomination to the bench, Justice Rabner served as chief counsel to Governor Jon Corzine and as Attorney General for the State of New Jersey. Chief Justice Rabner was confirmed by the New Jersey State Senate and sworn into office in 2007. In 2014, he received tenure as Chief Justice after nomination by Governor Christie and confirmation by the State Senate. Overview of the Case and Issues on Appeal This competition is dedicated to teaching second and third year law students about advanced advocacy in both written and verbal forms. The students in the Hunter Program are part of a very select group, each of whom has completed multiple steps to reach this stage of the competition. This past fall, students were divided into teams and as part of their coursework, they analyzed the complicated legal simulation developed by the professors and the Hunter Moot Court Board. The fall semester culminated with the students submitting a federal appellate brief on the legal issues contained in the simulation. During this semester, the students shifted their focus to improving their public speaking and oral advocacy skills. The culmination of the year is the oral argument competition. During the students’ presentations, the judges ask them questions about the various legal issues present in the simulation. Each team of two students is scored on how well they are able to do all of this in the allotted twenty-four minutes of argument time. The Parties: Candied Adventures, LLC, Defendant-Appellant v. Molly Kemery, Plaintiff-Appellee This simulation has two legal issues: first, whether a person’s weight is considered a disability under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), and second, whether offensive comments made by amusement park employees about a person’s weight entitle the obese person to sue for the emotional distress those comments caused. Molly Kemery, the plaintiff-appellee, weighs 225 pounds and is 5’7” tall. On June 8, 2013, Kemery attended her twenty-year high school reunion at Candied Adventures, which is an amusement park containing twenty-eight rides and employing about 750 people. Candied Adventures is particularly well known for offering accommodations and generous discounts to veterans and their families. Kemery was eager to enjoy the rides, particularly the fantasy-themed Battle at Candy Castle, so she purchased a yearlong pass upon entering the Park. The events which give rise to the lawsuit began when Kemery got in line to ride the Battle at Candy Castle. At the beginning of the line, the ride provides a test seat, equipped with a lighting system for patrons to test their suitability for the ride. Green means go, yellow is a signal to wait, and red means the rider is unsuited for the ride. Before getting in line, Kemery sat in the test seat, which showed a yellow light indicator. Nonetheless, the test seat operator told Kemery that she would be fine to ride Battle at Candy Castle. Kemery was embarrassed after the experience and she immediately left that section of the Park. Eventually she bought lunch and a bag of candy at one of the many stores inside the Park. After a while she made her way to Candied Adventures’ marquee roller coaster, Sugar Rush. However, while Kemery was waiting in line, the ride attendant, Brandon Quigley, walked up to her and said, “Your Page7 After waiting over an hour in line with many others from her class reunion, Kemery boarded the ride. However, when the ride operator, John Hogan, (a different Park employee from the test seat operator) attempted to elevate the seats to the flying position, the ride remained motionless. Hogan then approached Kemery specifically and directed her to accompany him to a second test seat, located on the platform. This time, the light turned red. When Kemery protested, Hogan said, “Listen lady, you’re just too damn fat to get on the ride. Okay? So it’s time for you to go.” Although Kemery wanted to handle the incident discreetly, Hogan directed her to exit from the way she came in— passing the entire waiting line of riders in the process. As she exited, Hogan exclaimed, “I can’t believe that lady thought she could fit those gigantic boobs into the seat.” The observing crowd erupted in laughter. A concerned mother who was not a part of the class reunion witnessed the incident and reported it to customer service. By way of background, some of these same classmates had bullied Kemery about her weight when she was in high school. name is Molly, right?” When Kemery confirmed her identity, Quigley said, “Look, Mega Molly, you aren’t going to fit on this ride either.” It turned out that the ride attendant from Battle at Candy Castle had both tweeted and texted about the event, spreading the word about Kemery to other Candied Adventures employees. When Kemery protested, Quigley responded while eyeing the bag of candy in Kemery’s hands, “The only sugar rush you will be feeling today is when you undoubtedly eat yourself into a candy coma with that big bag you have got there.” Kemery then left the Park, and she later learned that the son of one of her classmates had recorded a video of her embarrassing experience at Battle at Candy Castle on his iPhone. The classmate uploaded his son’s video to a YouTube account and posted about it on Facebook, writing, “It ain’t over till Molly sings!” Many of her classmates who had attended the reunion saw this post. Over the next few days, Kemery received notifications on her phone every time her classmates “liked” or commented on the video. Kemery fell into a deep depression that caused her to lose her job. PROCEDURAL HISTORY Kemery sued Candied Adventures in Pennsylvania federal court alleging violations of the ADA and tort liability for intentional infliction of emotional distress (“IIED”). Kemery argued her obesity qualifies as a disability and that Candied Adventures should therefore be required to modify Battle at Candy Castle and Sugar Rush to accommodate her so she and other obese individuals can ride the rides. Kemery also alleged that the actions of the Park and its employees were sufficient to establish liability for intentionally inflicting distress upon her in violation of Pennsylvania law. A federal district court judge in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania ruled in favor of Kemery on both issues and found that Kemery’s obesity qualified as a disability under the ADA and ordered Candied Adventures to modify its rides to permit access by obese patrons. The judge also found that Candied Adventures’ conduct was both intentional and beyond the decency of society, and, therefore, all the requirements of IIED were satisfied. Candied Adventures filed the present appeal that gives rise to the oral argument. LEGAL ARGUMENTS The students, arguing for either Kemery or Candied Adventures, will split the oral argument up into its two main issues: (1) whether the ADA covers obesity as a disability, and if so, whether Candied Adventures must modify its rides to accommodate people like Kemery; and (2) whether the Park employees’ behavior met the standards for IIED. Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress While IIED is a state law claim, most jurisdictions, including the Third Circuit and other courts interpreting Pennsylvania law, look to the Restatement (Second) of Torts for guidance. In order to prevail on an IIED claim under this standard, Kemery must show: ( 1 ) that the conduct at issue was extreme and outrageous; (2) that the conduct was either intentional or reckless; (3) that the conduct caused Kemery’s distress; and (4) that the emotional distress was severe. Kemery prevailed on all of these elements in the trial below, but if the appellate court finds that any one of the elements was not met, Candied Adventures will prevail on the IIED issue. Page8 Detailed information about the legal arguments The ADA In 1990, Congress passed the ADA in order to ensure equal opportunity for individuals with disabilities in a variety of settings. With respect to an individual, disability is defined as a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more of the major life activities of such individual. In order to show that one’s disability entitles one to reasonable accommodations, a condition must be: (1) a physical or mental impairment; (2) the impairment must be substantially limiting; and (3) the impairment must limit a major life activity. Guest Judges in the 2014-2015 Competition Semi-Finals Hon. Joel Schneider Stephen Orlofsky Laurie Magid Quarterfinals Hon. Renee Bumb Hon. David Strawbridge Hon. David Ragonese Hon. Karen Williams Hon. Andrew Altenburg Deborah Mains Hunter Dozen Hon. Daniel Bernardin Elizabeth Carbone Anthony Perno Christina Congdon Barbara Gotthelf Anand Acharya Ragner Jaeger Logan Elliott Pettigrew Jason Redd Estelle Bronstein First Round Steven Shur Elizabeth Pascal Brian Quigley Norman Gross Neal Thakkar Anne Taylor Willam Castner Kevin Costello Hon. James Maley Justin Danilewitz Brian O’Neil Debbie Mikkelsen Lloyd Freeman Anthony Perno Mark Gulbranson Andrew Ruymann Sarah Thakkar Matthew Skahill Mark Strasle Glenn Moramarco Francisco Maldonado-Ramirez Joshua Hafetz Sara Fedorczyk Jason Redd Grant Berger Kiara Kyung Han Daniel DeFigilo Noah Dennison Howard Weiner Sara Aliabadi Kate McDonnell Hon. Mary White Jeremy Abay Irene Dowdy Aysha Ames Steven D’Aguanno Joel Juffe Andrew Slom Kate McDonnell Faculty Rounds John Beckerman Bob Williams Rich Barkasy Carol Wallinger Dennis Braithwaite Craig Oren Mel Shuster Jason Cohen Steven Friedell Roger Clark Pam Jenoff Katie Eyer Phillip Harvey Sarah Ricks RJ Norcia Kati Kovacs Lou Moffa Harriet Katz Brandon Simmons Carly Campoli Katrina Xyloportas Panayiota Kotokis Jeanne Rigas Evan Bendon Steven Joy Chelsea Nixon David Coppola Daniel Lefebvre Craig Wagenblast PJ Farinella David Incle Brian Noble Andrew Sonricker Page9 Bailiffs Bassel Rabah Thank you Acting Dean John Oberdiek, and Vice Dean Adam Scales for their continued support And Marjorie Hemmings Fran Brigandi For her continued support and unending patience. Who stepped into the role of event planner and co-coordinator with grace and efficiency. We simply could not have done this without her. Nancy Talley R.J. Norcia, Brandon Simmons, Kathryn Somerset Our wonderful research librarian, who put together videos and held research conferences with students. Our 3L Hunter alumni who were there to help when we needed extra hands. Professor Katie Eyer Matthew Hollowniczky, Jacob de Blecourt, & Shelby Robbins Thank you for talking to us about the law of Title III and public accommodations & to Professor Victoria Chase who helped us build the storyline last summer For the field research at amusement parks and with Dungeons & Dragons Professor J.C. Lore Cathy Donovan For understanding our need to take over the moot courtroom when one of our first rounds was cancelled due to snow. For help and direction with public relations and for promoting the program on our social media. The Honorable Octavia Melendez, J.S.C., George Kemery & Professor Carol Wallinger The Chambers of The Honorable Ann Marie Donio, & in particular, Sharon Crescenti For volunteering part of their Saturday to our oral advocacy workshop that was well attended and very well received by our students. Hunter Alumni – Aysha Ames, Liz Carbone, Christina Congdon, Daniel DeFiglo, Noah Dennison, Mark Gulbranson, Kiara Kyung Han, Ragner Jaeger, Joel Juffe, Brian O’Neil, Logan Elliott Pettigrew, Steven Shur, Andrew Slom, Mark Strasle For the continued support and dedication that you show the Hunter program Friends and Family of the 2014-2015 Hunter Students For the overwhelming support that we have had at all of the arguments this year. for arranging and assisting with our use of the federal courthouse. The federal judges who very kindly let us use their courtrooms: The Honorable Andrew B. Altenberg, Jr. The Honorable Gloria M. Burns, The Honorable Ann Marie Donio The Honorable Noel L. Hillman The Honorable Joseph Rodriguez The Honorable Joel Schneider The Honorable Karen M. Williams Westlaw & Lexis Thank you for the extra training sessions & research help. Nolan Kirby For being so cheerful and helpful with late nights at the federal courthouse. For being “Master of the spreadsheet and all things mathematics related.” Elizabeth Pascal For coordinating the assistance of the AUSAs who are integral to our program’s success. Page10 Federal Courthouse Security and Staff The Honorable James Hunter III Moot Court Legacy Past Winners of the oral argument competition 2013–14 Benjamin Hartwell and RJ Norcia 2012–13 Keith Nagy and Meha Siyam 2011–12 Mark Natale and Logan Elliott Pettigrew 2010–11 Regina Lawrence and Nicole Gentile 2009–10 Alexander Hersonski and Scott Simpkins 2008–09 Michael Block and Geoffrey Stark 2007–08 Patrick Casteñeda and Christopher Emrich 2006–07 Brian Fitzsimmons and Elizabeth Livingston 2005–06 Wesley Huber and Christine Catalfamo 2004–05 Michelle Ofner and Joseph Rindone 2003–04 Marco Capasso and Kyle Phillips 2002–03 Ryan Gager and Christopher Morgan 2001–02 Jeanine Graham and Sarah Klosek 2000–01 Claire J. Evans and Kelly B. Hicks 1998–99 Elissa J. Ferrante and Amy J. Smith 1997–98 David P. Heim and Phil Young Cha 1996–97 Richard J. Hoff and Daniel J. McGravey 1995–96 Olga Chesler and Beth Eddinger Wesley 1994–95 Mary L. Grabka and Lori M. McNeely 1992–93 Saima Shafio and Suzanne C. Thomson 1990–91 William P. Flahive and D. Matthew Jameson, III 1989–90 David E. Ewan and Patricia A. Fralinger Page11 1999–2000 Debbie Anne Carlos and Carol Gershon Page12
© Copyright 2024