Observations on the performance of sheep using lick feeders Danny Roberts Veterinary Officer Department of Agriculture and Food Albany, Western Australia What are lick feeders? Restrictive feeding delivery device It requires sheep to actively ‘lick’ feed from restricted areas within the feeder The design results in less wastage from either spillage or spoilage compared with 18-24% loss with other types of self feeders 44% of surveyed sheep producers have a lick feeder Lick feeders were present on significantly more flocks with low labour ranking (66%) compared with high labour ranking (34%) Average of 3285 sheep per producer Enterprise type Other devises used by low labour use ranked producers include: sheep handlers, crutching cradles, electronic weigh crates Sheep CRC producer survey 2011 – 1000 respondents by phone Wool producers 27% Wool and prime lamb producers 50% Prime lamb producers 23% Benefits and costs of using lick feeders Significant reduction in labour and time required to feed sheep during summer, autumn and early winter Reduction in wastage of supplement – reduce wastage by 12% = 8T @ $225/T - take 8 years for feeder paid for by savings on wastage alone Supplement available 24/7 Increased variation of intake of a supplement with lick (CV 78%) feeders compared with on-ground trail feeding (CV 47%) Do lick feeders deliver – case 1 One lick feeder should deliver the supplement to 200 sheep without social factors inhibiting intake – ~2.5 cm of trough space per sheep 385 merino wethers (9 months) with access to lick feeders on the original property Placed in a 12.5 hectare paddock that contained two Advantage lick feeders Two lick feeders were placed as far away from the water trough as possible The two lick feeders were separated across the paddock. The dry pasture residue in the paddock was eaten or tramped within one week Sheep consumed lick pellets and had access to oaten hay Aim was to restrict the intake of lick pellets and allow a gradual increase before ad-lib feeding in a feedlot pen Performance of sheep in a confinement paddock Estimated intake of 800-900 grams per head per day of pellets when the feeders were ‘set’ at 350 grams per head per day The rate of introduction of the pellets was more rapid than the recommended program of daily feeding using feed carts Performance of sheep in a feedlot pen The sheep were transferred to a feedlot pen – with unrestricted access to lick feeders - one lick feeder per 110 sheep – providing 4 cm trough space per head Had access to oaten hay and green kikuyu Consumed 500 grams per head per day The presence of kikuyu in the feedlot pen appeared to alter lick feeding behaviour by reducing intake of the pellets Sheep behaving badly Sheep consumed varying amounts of pellets from the two different lick feeders in the same paddock Sheep appear to quickly identity which side of the lick feeders were partially blocked and actively avoided these sides of the feeder Feeders required monitoring every second day to avoid partial blockages in the first 14 days Checking could safely move to every 5-7 days once the blockages were overcome Do lick feeders deliver - case 2 155 pregnant merino ewes (3-4 years old) had access to one lick feeders located in the feedlot paddock as well as access to dry pasture residues. The lick feeder is set to provide 250 g/head/day of lupins. The estimated average intake of lupin seed is 333 g/head/day after 12 days of access to a lick feeder. However, daily intake can vary from as little as 8 g/head/day when the feeder almost empty to 847 g/head/day immediately after a refill. In the first 7 days following the introduction of sheep to the lick feeder - they remained mostly in the feedlot area that contains the lick feeder. They are now spending more time grazing the dry pastures in the annual farmlet. Health issues associated with lick feeders Enterotoxaemia in unvaccinated sheep Clinical rumen acidosis Pregnancy toxaemia in ewes Salmonellosis Black Mastitis in ewes A noticeable proportion of sheep considered as ‘poor doers’ within a mob Monitoring sheep on lick feeders How do you detect abnormal feeding behaviour or unhealthy sheep when they just stand around the feeder and Sheep spend a relatively short time eating supplements Low faecal consistency score and 50% or more chewing their cud The ability of producers to detect abnormal feeding behaviour decreases as the size of the mob increases Observations from sheep producers Report a large variation in amount eaten between different mobs and performance of individual sheep within a mob Average intake of supplement is greater than anticipated when a low amount of dry FOO was present in the paddock Perform least effectively as a restrictive feeding delivery method with low amounts of dry pasture present Perform most effective as a restrictive feeding delivery method when sheep are grazing green pasture Others problems …. Don’t do a feed budget – know the CS of sheep at the start and 2 or 4 or 6 weeks time in order to determine the correct amount of supplement required Often have more than 200 sheep per lick feeder Experience problems with blockage of one side of feeder Tend to refill the feeder on set days as part of their labour and time saving strategy Condition score the sheep – ‘let the sheep do the talking’ Train the sheep Lambs recognize grain and feeders if trained with mum Train sheep well before they need to go onto lick feeders Sheep must get a reward of grain on first visit to a feeder Train sheep using a safe supplement like lupin seed Have lupin seed in drip tray and overflowing from lick section Summary Lick feeders can restricted the access of pellets but not as much as anticipated Sheep can modifying intake of lick pellets independently of the design of the feeder Lick feeders are most effective as a restrictive feeding delivery method when sheep are grazing green pasture Many claims about lick feeders still need verification Alternative to lick feeders – spread lupin seed across the paddock
© Copyright 2024