East Sussex Teacher Training Partnership Assignment 2 Title: How important are monitoring, assessment, record keeping and reporting in the teaching and learning process? 1 Confidence in making formative and summative assessments, together with secure Assessment for Learning (AfL) practices enable teachers to monitor and assess the attainment and achievement of learners and to plan to meet their needs effectively. Teachers know that learners will make good progress if they are given regular, constructive and formative feedback. Teachers also recognise the benefits of self and peer assessment, giving learners responsibility for assessing their own progress and deciding what and how to improve. They use national and local pupil performance data to compare the progress and attainment of learners, to set targets, to inform their teaching and to accelerate learning. A secure knowledge of national assessment requirements helps teachers to prepare learners well for statutory assessments. (2) Promote good progress and outcomes by pupils - guide pupils to reflect on the progress they have made and their emerging needs (6) Make accurate and productive use of assessment - know and understand how to assess the relevant subject and curriculum areas, including statutory assessment requirements - make use of formative and summative assessment to secure pupils’ progress - use relevant data to monitor progress, set targets, and plan subsequent lessons - give pupils regular feedback, both orally and through accurate marking, and encourage pupils to respond to the feedback. Assignment objectives To enable you to: • Explain the importance of assessment, record keeping and reporting; • Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the purposes and practices of assessment, including the principles and techniques of Assessment for Learning. • Demonstrate secure knowledge and understanding of the assessment requirements and arrangements relevant to Key Stage 1 and 2 including assessment requirements for National Curriculum testing • Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of how schools use statistical information and how this relates to the national picture. • Demonstrate that you can access and interpret this information to help raise learners’ achievement Guidance • • • • • • • • • 1 Explain the importance of assessment, record keeping and reporting Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the purposes and practices of assessment, including the principles and techniques of Assessment for Learning, the assessment requirements and arrangements relevant to Key Stage 1 and 2 including assessment requirements for National Curriculum testing Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of how schools use statistical information and how this relates to the national picture and show that you can access and interpret this information to help raise learners’ achievement Show evidence of thorough study and related classroom practice Show awareness of where to find, and how to critically engage with, evidence from sources such as research and inspection reports Analyse and evaluate the impact of this on your practice (past, present and future) Reflect on and improve your practice, and take responsibility for identifying and meeting your developing professional needs Demonstrate ability to discuss important general issues in education as well as your own classroom practice Demonstrate ability to engage in critical debate about current educational issues, drawing on evidence from theory, research and practice. In particular, consider “Assessment without levels” under the new national curriculum “Assessment for Learning (AfL) is the process of seeking and interpreting evidence for use by learners and their teachers to decide where the learners are in their learning, where they need to go and how best to get there.” (Assessment Reform Group 2002) Assessment criteria In order to achieve a PASS, your work should show: • Evidence of thorough study and related classroom practice • Knowledge and understanding of the importance of assessment and its role in teaching and learning • Sources such as research and inspection reports • An ability to discuss important general issues in education as well as your own classroom practice • Achievement of all other assignment objectives • Coherence and clarity of thought and expression • Ability to reference in appropriate academic manner • A high standard of presentation The criteria for a FAIL are: • • • • • Insufficient knowledge and understanding of the importance of subject knowledge in subjects chosen Insufficient demonstration of ability to address subject knowledge through personal study Failure to meet the other assignment objectives Lack of clear structure and fluency Poorly or inadequately referenced Word count The essay, not including supporting evidence in the form of numbered appendices, should be equivalent to a minimum of 3,000 words. Please add a bibliography (e.g. including primary strategy material, websites, research and inspection evidence plus any other reference materials used). Appendices (not counted in word length) Your appendices may include, examples of your planning over time which demonstrate your use of assessment, evidence of your use of targets, record keeping, written evaluations of teaching, case studies and other written materials, evidence of assessment of class and homework, and logs of discussion of this assessment evidence with tutors and mentors. You will not be expected to rewrite or type material included in the appendices. References You must include a list of texts referred to in the essay Presentation Your essay will be returned if not properly presented. Submission date: th Thursday 26 March 2015 Extensions • • • The granting of extensions will only be made in exceptional circumstances, such as illness, and is agreed at the discretion of the Course Tutor. Technical problems e.g. with computer failure, are not sufficient grounds for an extension or late submission. Extensions should normally be applied for at least a week before the submission date, in the first instance to the Course Tutor. Assignment grading Requires improvement 50-69% Must demonstrate all of the following: Demonstrates a good level of understanding of assessment requirements Shows understanding of the school’s approach to assessment including use of level descriptors/APP Demonstrates ability to use different approaches to assessment Demonstrates use of assessment for learning (AfL) strategies Able to articulate the importance of formative assessments and knows how to use these effectively to help raise the attainment of pupils Understands the benefits of involving learners in the assessment of their own learning Able to make use of group and individual targets, and knows how these are generated Shows evidence of monitoring and recording learners’ progress Able to evaluate own teaching accurately Understands the need to evaluate the effectiveness of it through the impact on learners. Able to take some responsibility for own professional development using reflection and personal target-setting Aware of important general issues in education related to assessment Good 70-89% Demonstrates all of the criteria for ‘satisfactory’ grading plus: Shows clear understanding of and ability to use a range of assessment strategies matched well to intended learning outcomes Demonstrates ability to use the school’s approach to assessment using level descriptors/APP Shows understanding of importance of moderating and interpreting assessments Shows clear understanding of assessment requirements and how the school goes about preparing learners for assessments Is aware of the available data sets in school and how these are used and can set realistic targets for achievement based on the data available Shows evidence of monitoring and recording learners’ progress and knows how the outcomes from this are used in subsequent planning Understands the need to take responsibility for own professional development through constructively critical evaluation of own practice and setting challenging targets Able to engage with research and inspection reports and to discuss important general issues related to change in education in relation to own classroom practice Implements what has been learnt, uses review and critical reflection. Outstanding 90% and above Demonstrates all of the criteria for ‘good’ grading plus: Demonstrates confidence in using a range of assessment strategies, reflecting a very good understanding of the theory and practice of assessment. Demonstrates ability to monitor learners’ progress to evaluate quickly how well things are going to be able to change the approach during the lesson, or subsequently if necessary; Able to interpret and use the school’s performance data to judge starting-points and target levels of attainment. Can articulate the value of a range of assessment approaches, including formative assessment and the contribution that pupil level data can make to learning and teaching, and to raising achievement Shows evidence of monitoring and recording learners’ progress and how the outcomes from this are used in subsequent planning – with a clear focus on individuals and groups Critical and highly reflective evaluation of own practice Able to be proactive in developing knowledge and understanding and related pedagogy Able to critically appraise own and others’ practice in the light of innovation and to develop own practice as a result Presentation of work How work is presented is of great importance, not only because trainees are engaged on an academic course but also because this is an extremely important aspect of the professionalism of teachers. These points should be followed when presenting your assignment: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 All work should be clear and legible, and must be word processed. Paper should be A4 size and printed on one side only. Margins should be generally 1-1.5 inches and work double spaced. A cover sheet should clearly indicate your name, title of the piece of work and the date. Where appropriate, a contents page should be included. All pages should be numbered and word length observed. Spelling, punctuation and grammar must be accurate. References should be accurately presented. All names of teachers, children and schools should be deleted or appropriate pseudonyms substituted. (This is standard academic practice.) Essays should be securely bound, with appendices included. (If appendices need to be removed later, e.g. extracts from school file or examples of children’s work, they should be enclosed in plastic A4 envelopes which are bound into the whole.) Any work which is poorly presented will be returned for re-submission. References The reference section in all submissions must be in alphabetical order by author’s last name. It should be doublespaced and all works cited in the text must be listed. No reference should be added for works not cited in the text. Always avoid abbreviations of journal titles and incomplete information. Follow examples below for content and punctuation. Examples - within text Within the text two things are needed to allow anyone reading the essay to be able to identify the work referred to: the author’s last name and the date of the publication. e.g. ‘...an alternative interpretation is offered by Short (1985) who suggests...’ or ‘...such processes (Bruner, 1986) identified in young children help us...’ If specific reference is made or a quote is taken directly from the text, page numbers should also be supplied. e.g. ‘...in collaboration with more capable peers.” (Vygotsky, 1978, p.86).’ Where a quote is two lines or more, it should be indented and single spaced. If the quote is short, it may be integrated. Examples - within reference list There is a universally acknowledged method of referencing, known as the Harvard system, which is used on academic courses. For a book or pamphlet provide author’s last name, followed by initial(s), date, the book’s title (underlined) and lastly the place of publication and the publisher e.g. Waterland, L. (1988), Read With Me. Glos., Thimble Press. For a chapter in a book provide the author’s name, date of book and title of chapter followed by the word ‘in’ and the full reference of the book (as above, although there is no need to repeat the date). e.g. Alexander, R. (1994), ‘The classteacher and the curriculum.’, in, Pollard, A. and Bourne, J. (eds.) Teaching and Learning in the Primary School. London, Routledge in ass. with The Open University. For a journal article provide the author’s name, date and title of article followed by the journal title (underlined) and volume and issue numbers and pages. e.g. Harlen, W. and Quarter, A. (1991), ‘Issues in SAT development and the practice of teacher assessment.’, Cambridge Journal of Education, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp l4l -52. Footnotes Notes which refer to the text should be used only when absolutely necessary. If notes are used, they should be numbered consecutively and placed on a separate page at the end of the essay, headed ‘Footnotes’. Assessment and marking procedures for written work Criteria for each assignment are shown in the assignment specifications, and must be used as the basis for assessing and marking submissions. Presentation of trainee work Any submissions which do not fulfil requirements for presentation as set out in the guidance should be returned to trainees unmarked. The trainee must then resubmit by an agreed date. Marking For essay submissions, i.e. Assignments 1 and 2, the following points apply • Scripts should not be written on except to correct spelling and punctuation errors, to indicate reference omissions and make other brief comments. Report Writing In completing the report forms, markers should: • Address the assignment criteria and ensure that these have been met; • Complete the report form giving formative feedback to the trainee. Moderation Moderation will be in two stages. • After marking, the Course Tutor will identify a strong, a weak and an average essay which will then be second marked. • At the course moderation meeting: the criteria for the assignment are reviewed; identified essays are second marked and the assessments compared in relation to the assignment criteria; where necessary, other essays also be second marked. Failed submissions The SCITT Course Coordinator should be informed immediately of any submissions identified as ‘failures’. These must be second marked and in the case of an agreed fail the trainee must resubmit by an agreed date 5
© Copyright 2024