11/17/2010 NSAIDS Injury – How to Prevent it H. Juergen Nord, MD, FACP, MACG Professor of Medicine University of South Florida College of Medicine Tampa, FL 11/17/2010 NSAIDS: The size of the problem in the US NSAID/ASA use common in Rx of pain, inflammation, fever Low dose ASA used routinely for primary, second prophylaxis of CV, cerebrovascular events National prescription audit 2004 ● NSAID prescriptions: 111,400,000 ● Total cost: $4,800,000,000 Sales of OTC oral analgesics: $3 billion ● 60% NSAIDs including ASA NSAID taking among people >65 years: ● 1 dose / week 70% ● Daily 34% Shaheen, Shaheen, AJG AJG 2006; 2006; 101:2128 101:2128 11/17/2010 Scope of NSAID gastropathy Dyspepsia in up to 50% of patients (1.5- to 2-fold increment vs controls) Results in discontinuation or change of medication in 10% of patients Gastric ulcers in 15–20% Duodenal ulcers in 5–8% Complications increased 4-fold Risk of a complication is 1–4% per year Graham, Ann Intern Med 1993; 119: 257 Langman et al, Lancet 1994; 343: 1075 Larkai et al, J Clin Gastroenterol 1989; 11: 158 Silverstein, Ann Intern Med 1995; 123: 241 11/17/2010 NSAID Healthcare Costs Per $ spent on NSAID’s - $0.66 - $1.25 is spent on managing side effects 30% of arthritis care costs are for GI adverse events > 100,000 hospitalizations and 16,700 deaths/year in US Direct US cost: $ 4 billion/year Rahme et al. Arthritis Rheum 2000; 43:917 Wolfe et al. N Engl J Med 1999; 340:1888 March et al. Baillieres Clin Rheumatol 1997; 11:817 11/17/2010 Mortality from NSAID-induced GI complications vs other diseases in the US ● 25th most common cause of death, US 1 National Center for Health Statistics, 1998 and Triadafilopoulos, J Rheum 1999; 26: 18 3 Johnson, Rev Cardiovasc Med 2005; 6:S15 2 Singh 11/17/2010 Risk factors for NSAID-associated ulcer complications Note! - Majority of patients who develop a serious GI adverse event on NSAIDs are asymptomatic prior to event - Risk is greatest in first three months of use Gabriel et al, Ann Intern Med 1991; 115: 787 Garcia Rodriguez et al, Lancet 1994; 343: 769 Silverstein et al, Ann Intern Med 1995; 123: 241 11/17/2010 H. pylori and NSAID: Additive or synergistic on gastric mucosal damage 11/17/2010 H. pylori, NSAID use, and risk of peptic ulcer disease: Meta-analysis of 5 case control studies Huang Huang et et al, al, Lancet Lancet 2002; 2002; 359: 359: 14 14 11/17/2010 Recommendation Testing for and eradication of H. pylori in patients with an ulcer Hx is recommended before starting chronic antiplatelet therapy. ACCF/ACG/AHA 2008 Expert Consensus Document Am J Gastroenterol 2008; 103:2890 11/17/2010 ACG bleeding registry: Risk factors for GI bleeding Peura et al, Am J Gastroenterol 1997; 92: 924 11/17/2010 Key points There is considerable morbidity and mortality associated with NSAID use Concurrent use of multiple NSAIDs (including a non-aspirin NSAID with any dose of aspirin) is a major risk factor for GI complications H. pylori and alcohol increase the risk of upper GI bleeding when taken with non-aspirin NSAIDs or aspirin 11/17/2010 Dyspepsia 11/17/2010 NSAID-associated dyspepsia Most common reason for stopping NSAID Does not correlate with endoscopic findings Not a clear risk factor for ulcer complications COX-2 selective NSAIDs associated with less dyspepsia but still more than placebo Reduced or relieved by PPI co-therapy 11/17/2010 PPIs for GI side effects in “at-risk” patients starting NSAID therapy Non peptic ulcer patients with mild dyspepsia Cullen et al, Aliment Pharmacol Ther 1998; 12: 135 Patients with history of dyspepsia or PUD Ekström et al, Scand J Gastroenterol 1996; 31: 753 11/17/2010 Strategies for managing NSAID-associated dyspepsia: Role of PPIs Dyspepsia patients should be given empiric PPI therapy PPIs have shown benefit over H2RAs or misoprostol in relieving dyspepsia1,2 Changing to another NSAID or COX-2 selective NSAID may still result in dyspepsia 1Yeomans et al, N Engl J Med 1998; 338: 719 2Hawkey et al, N Engl J Med 1998; 338: 727 11/17/2010 Healing and prevention of NSAID associated ulcers Healing of NSAID-associated GU and DU: Comparison of omeprazole and ranitidine (continuing NSAIDs) 11/17/2010 Yeomans et al, N Engl J Med 1998; 338: 719 11/17/2010 Gastric ulcer healing: Comparison of lansoprazole and ranitidine (continuing NSAIDs) ** p<0.01 vs either dose of lansoprazole *** p<0.001 vs either dose of lansoprazole Sontag et al, Am J Gastroenterol 1999; 94: 2620 Preventing ulcer relapse: Placebo-controlled comparison of lansoprazole and misoprostol 11/17/2010 357 patients: H. pylori-negative, long-term NSAID takers p<0.001 lansoprazole, misoprostol vs placebo Misoprostol associated with significantly more adverse events than lansoprazole or placebo, p<0.001 Graham Graham et et al, al, Arch Arch Intern Intern Med Med 2002; 2002; 162: 162: 169 169 11/17/2010 Healing and secondary prevention of NSAID-associated ulcers: Summary PPIs superior to H2-receptor antagonists and sucralfate in healing Only PPIs and misoprostol shown to be effective for secondary prophylaxis PPIs are the preferred agents for the therapy and prophylaxis of NSAID and ASA-associated GI injury ACCF/ACG/AHA 2008 Expert Consensus Document Am J Gastroenterol 2008; 103:2890 11/17/2010 COX-2 selective NSAIDs A safer NSAID? 11/17/2010 Normal distribution of COX isoenzymes COX-1 COX-2 Digestive system ● esophagus ● stomach ● intestine ● liver ● pancreas Brain ● neurons Kidney ● interstitium ● medulla ● collecting ducts Pancreas ● islet cells Hematological system ● platelets Bone Kidney ● renal cortex Female reproductive tract ● ovary ● uterus Vascular endothelium After Lipsky, Am J Med 1999; 106: 51s 11/17/2010 Does an Aspirin a Day Take the GI Benefit of COX-2s Away? Arachidonic acid COX-1 Aspirin COX-2 COXIB Prostaglandins Protection of gastric mucosa Prostaglandins Hemostasis Mediation of pain, Inflammation, and fever Adapted from Cryer B. Chapter 23. In: Sleisenger & Fordtran’s Gastrointestinal and Liver Disease. 7th ed. 2002:410. 11/17/2010 NSAIDs, ASA, COXIBS, CLOPIDOGREL ASA/NSAID effect on coxibs likely underappreciated Increased CV risk of NSAIDs likely further increased addition of ASA to anti-inflammation therapy Clopidogrel decreases platelet-derived growth factors/angiogenesis Results in impaired ulcer healing Clopidogrel in presence of acid, H. pylori may lead to mucosal ulceration and its complications MA, Natl Acad Sci USA 2001; 98:6470 11/17/2010 Cumulative probability of recurrent ulcer bleeding: Omeprazole + NSAID vs celecoxib in the high-risk patient (previous ulcer complication) Chan Chan et et al, al, N N Engl Engl JJ Med Med 2002; 2002; 347: 347: 2104 2104 11/17/2010 Ulcer Recurrence PPI (Eso) in High Risk NSAID Users Eso 40 mg Eso 20 mg Placebo 0% 0% 19.1% Cox 2 selective NSAID Non-selective 5.1% 5.9% 10.6% NSAID N – 585, international study, p < 0.05 vs. placebo In high risk patients esomeprazole significantly reduced ulcer recurrence @ 6 months Scheiman, Am J Gastrointerol 2003; 98:S52 11/17/2010 Lack of long-term advantage of celecoxib Adapted Adapted from: from: www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/01/slides/3677s1_01_sponsor.pdf www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/01/slides/3677s1_01_sponsor.pdf 11/17/2010 Small bowel mucosal injury in chronic NSAID users Open label, endoscopist-blind, prevalence study using capsule endoscopy Non-selective NSAID users: 71% Controls : 10% p < 0.001 Small bowel lesions are common in NSAID users Graham. Clin Gastroenterol. Hepatol 2005; 3:55 11/17/2010 Serious lower GI tract clinical events: Comparison of rofecoxib and naproxen (VIGOR) * Relative risk reduction 54%; p=0.03 Laine et al, Gastroenterology 2003; 124: 288 11/17/2010 Impact of aspirin co-therapy on therapeutic choice 11/17/2010 Cardiovascular benefits of aspirin 15% reduced risk of stroke in patients with previous TIAs1 15% reduced rate of cardiovascular events in patients with coronary artery disease2 Anti-platelet effect may last for up to 10 days because of irreversible acetylation of COX-1 Other non-selective NSAIDs are reversible COX inhibitors and so effective period is shorter and dependent on plasma half-life 1Sacco et al, Arch Intern Med 2000; 16: 1579 2Sanmuganathan et al, Heart 2001; 85: 265 11/17/2010 Mechanism of aspirin’s anti-thrombotic effect Irreversible acetylation of serine in COX-1, completely inactivates COX-1 for life of platelet Production of thromboxane A2 (platelet aggregation and vasoconstriction) is inhibited, providing antithrombotic effect Aspirin is a very potent COX-1 inhibitor but a weak COX-2 inhibitor All other NSAIDs are reversible, with varying degrees/ durations of thromboxane inhibition Aspirin + ibuprofen increases CV risk compared to aspirin alone or aspirin + other NSAID (hazard ratio 1.93) Naproxen vs. non-naproxen NSAIDs has a lower MI risk (RR 0.86) NSAID of choice for card. risk patients (FDA 2005) Awtry and Loscalzo, Circulation 2000; 101: 1206 Juni, Lancet 2004; 364:2021 11/17/2010 Cardiovascular Risk (MI, CVA) Associated with NSAIDs in Healthy Individuals Nationwide cohort study: 1,028.437 Danish individuals OR 95% CI Non-selective NSAID BUT Cox- 2 selective NSAID diclofenac ibuprofen naproxen refecoxib 1.91 1.29 0.84 1.91 (1.62-2.42) (1.02-1.63) (10.50-1.42) (1.62-2.42) Conclusion: Individual NSAIDs: different, dose dependent CV safety Diclofenac : use with caution Naproxen : safer cardiovascular risk-profile Fosbol. Cir Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. June 8, 2010 (E pub) 11/17/2010 Aspirin dosing Daily 75 mg dose completely inhibits COX-1 within a few days Higher doses not more effective but may increase risk of GI side effects Low-dose aspirin may cause preferential inhibition of platelet COX vs endothelial COX (theoretical anti-thrombotic advantage) Awtry and Loscalzo, Circulation 2000; 101: 1206 APTC, BMJ 1994; 308: 81 11/17/2010 Daily aspirin dose and admission for ulcer bleeding Aspirin dose Odds ratio (95% CI) 75 mg 2.3 (1.2–4.4) 150 mg 3.2 (1.7–6.5) 300 mg 3.9 (2.5–6.3) Bleeding risk is the same regardless of use of plain, buffered or enteric-coated aspirin Weil et al, BMJ 1995; 310: 827 Kelly et al, Lancet 1996; 348: 1413 11/17/2010 Who needs prophylactic ASA? ● US Preventive Services Task Force Guideline - 10-year risk of CV event is > 6% ● American Heart Association Guidelines - 10 year risk of EV event is > 10% ● 50x106 Americans use ASA for CV prophylaxis daily US Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 2002; 136:157 Pearson T, et al. Circulation 2002; 106-338 Chan, Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2004; 19:1051 11/17/2010 How are the net benefits of low-dose aspirin affected by cardiovascular risk? Benefit: Risk: Prevents Causes 5% 6–20 MIs 2–4 GI bleeds 0–2 hemorrhagic strokes 1% 1–4 MIs 2–4 GI bleeds 0–2 hemorrhagic strokes Risk of coronary events in 1000 patients over 5 yrs Calculator: http://hin/nhlbi.nih.gov/atpiii/cal culator.asp Hayden et al, Ann Intern Med 2002; 136: 161 Multiple NSAID use: The forgotten risk factor When 2 rights make a wrong 11/17/2010 National cohort study in Denmark 27,694 people on aspirin 100–150 mg qd Treatment regimen Increased incidence over general population 95% CI Low-dose aspirin 2.6 2.2–2.9 Low-dose aspirin + traditional NSAID 5.6 4.4–7.0 Sørensen et al, Am J Gastroenterol 2000; 95: 2218 11/17/2010 Placebo-controlled trial of lansoprazole for prevention of recurrent ulcer complications on low-dose aspirin Lai et al, N Engl J Med 2002; 346: 2033 11/17/2010 Ulcers and ulcer complications in “CLASS” at 12 months according to aspirin use http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/01/slides/3677s1_01_sponsor.pdf 11/17/2010 Recommendation Substitution of clopipidogrel for ASA is not a recommended strategy to reduce the risk of recurrent ulcer bleed in high risk individuals It is inferior to the combination of ASA plus PPI ACCF/ACG/AHA 2008 Expert Consensus Document Am J Gastroenterol 2008; 103:2890 11/17/2010 A Clinician’s Guide to NSAID Therapy in 2010 Average GI Risk Average CV risk (no aspirin) High CV risk (consider aspirin) * Ibuprofen Nonselective NSAID alone High GI Risk Coxib + PPI/misoprostol or Traditional NSAID + PPI Naproxen (if not on aspirin) Avoid NSAIDs if possible Naproxen + PPI/misoprostol (if on aspirin) Naproxen + PPI/ misoprostol (irrespective of concomitant ASA use) should be used cautiously in individuals taking ASA Chan, Am J Gastroenterol 2008; 103:2908 11/17/2010 Summary Absolute benefits of aspirin outweigh risks of major GI bleeding in patients at moderateto high-risk coronary heart disease Aspirin may not be beneficial in patients with low-risk of CHD due to increased GI bleeding and hemorrhagic stroke Coxibs increase CV risk (class effect) but have greater GI safety (in absence of ASA) NSAIDs may not be safer than coxibs (CV effect) 11/17/2010 Impact of NSAID gastropathy: Summary NSAIDs are recognized as a significant cause of GI symptoms, ulcers and complications Low dose aspirin should only be used in patients in whom CV benefit outweighs GI risks H. pylori is a cofactor for ulcer and complications. Test and treat at risk groups PPIs allow patients to get the most benefit from their NSAID therapy by reducing GI risks
© Copyright 2024