z How to proceed with the review of the EU Directive

z
How to proceed with the review of the EU Directive
-
Euroshore – FEBEM-FEGE Conference:
Ships’ waste: time for action!
Thursday 14 October 2010, Brussels
Jean-Louis Colson, Head of Unit
European Commission - DG MOVE
Maritime Transport Policy: Regulatory questions, maritime
safety & Seafarers
[email protected]
|
1
z
Directive 2000/59/EC on port reception facilities
.
.
State of play
The Commission, with the assistance of EMSA, is proceeding
with an evaluation aiming at assessing:
»
»
»
Whether the objectives of the Directive have been fulfilled
Main achievements of the Directive
Main obstacles related to the implementation of the Directive
It also looks at the way forward and possible improvements to
optimise the PRF system and the EU policy
»
»
»
»
Provisions to reinforced
Improving uniformity in the EU
Improving guidelines to Member States and ports
Simplification of the procedures
|
2
z
Directive 2000/59/EC on port reception facilities
.
Objectives
1.
Reduce the discharges of ship-generated waste and cargo
residues into the sea
»
»
Volume of waste delivered in EU ports is increasing
Number of ships delivering in EU ports is increasing
»
Difficulty to set a define ratio between waste discharged by
ships and land based activities
Availability of data
»
|
3
z
Directive 2000/59/EC on port reception facilities
.
Objectives
2.
»
Improve the availability and use of port reception facilities
Up to date waste reception and handling plans
• 2005-2010 the commission focused on the plans
• 17 infringement procedures launched
• 5 decisions in front of the European Court Of Justice for
absence of waste reception and handling plans (inc. for
small ports, marinas and fishing ports)
»
»
Few complains on availability and adequacy of the facilities
Few findings of EMSA on availability of facilities
|
4
z
Directive 2000/59/EC on port reception facilities
.
Objectives
3.
Effective implementation of the International Convention
Prevention of pollution from ships – MARPOL 73/78
»
Commission worked in IMO for the development of the
Standard Advance notification Form (ANF) based on the EU
notification form and a standards format for Waste Delivery
Receipt (WDR)
»
EMSA participate actively to the work of the revision of
Annex V of MARPOL 73/78
|
5
z
Directive 2000/59/EC on port reception facilities
.
Proceeding with a review
Improvements
Identify provisions that need improvements
»
»
»
»
Bring the definitions in line with MARPOL
Ensure fairness and transparency of the cost recovery
systems in place through an improved definition of the cost
of port reception facilities
Better use/processing of the notification form
Strengthened the delivery requirements and define sufficient
dedicated storage requirements
|
6
z
.
Directive 2000/59/EC on port reception facilities
Proceeding with a review
Guidelines
Identify provisions to be complemented by recommendations /
guidelines
»
»
»
»
»
Exemptions (i.e. definition of scheduled traffic, frequent and
regular – limitation to the EU)
Waste reception and handling plans for small ports
Involvement of the ports
Guidelines for inspectors
Dealing with cargo residues
|
7
z
Directive 2000/59/EC on port reception facilities
.
Proceeding with a review
Simplification
Simplification of procedures
»
»
»
Align the provisions on MARPOL/IMO (i.e. notification,
review of MARPOL Annex V, Annex VI)
Using the new instruments and tools developed at EU level
(i.e. Thetis, SafeSeaNet)
• Identify ships not notifying or not delivering
• Ensure a better flow of information between port
authorities and inspection authorities
• Ensure a better flow of information between member
States
Ensure a better consistency with the land waste legislation
|
8
z
Directive 2000/59/EC on port reception
facilities
.
..
Timeframe
The revision of the port reception facilities is included in the
Work Programme of the Commission for 2011
Proposal to be made by the end of 2011
In this process, the Commission counts on the support and
good cooperation of all
|
9
z
Directive 2000/59/EC on port reception facilities
.
.
.
Timeframe
By December 2010
» Evaluation under way to be completed by December
By June 2011
» Impact Assessment assessing the economic impacts and
the environmental impacts to be carried out with the
assistance of a consultant and EMSA – to be completed by
June 2011
Consultation of the member States and Stakeholders
» Internet consultation for the large public (March 2011)
» EMSA workshop (s) (tbc)
» Formal consultation in Brussels around March/April 2011
|
10
z
Directive 2000/59/EC on port reception facilities
.
Conclusion
Large efforts have been demonstrated by member
States and stakeholders
.
9
9
9
Using the existing framework further efforts will be
needed particularly on
Better coordination for monitoring and enforcement
Harmonisation
Availability of information
.
Simplifying the procedures when possible
|
11
z
z
Thank you
|
12