Devlen:JCH page.qxd 04/12/2009 12:22 Page 47 Journal of Business Continuity & Emergency Planning Volume 4 Number 1 How to build a comprehensive business continuity programme for a healthcare organisation Angela Devlen Received (in revised form): 14th September, 2009 Wakefield Brunswick, 276 Washington Street, #338, Boston, MA 02108, USA Tel: +1 617 710 4439; E-mail: [email protected] Angela Devlen is Managing Partner of Wakefield Brunswick, Inc., a management consulting firm specialising in disaster preparedness, business continuity and healthcare management. Prior to that, she was Director of Emergency Management at Caritas Christi Health Care. ABSTRACT Since 2005 there has been an ongoing examination of the impact of disasters on hospitals, with specific interest in those rendered inoperable or seriously crippled operationally and financially. Following several evaluations of these events and the publication of several reports detailing gaps in preparedness, more is known about the impact to hospitals directly affected by emergencies and catastrophic events. As a result, there have been continued updates to regulations and standards. However, a significant gap remains in the establishment of a model representing true integration of risk management practices within hospitals. This paper discusses one approach to addressing that gap through building a comprehensive business continuity programme for healthcare organisations. This programme is intended to result in a roadmap towards resilience in the face of the many risks faced by hospitals today. Keywords: healthcare, hospitals, emergencies, disasters, business continuity planning, (COOP) continuity of operations SETTING THE STAGE After the levees broke in New Orleans in 2005, hospitals were rendered inoperable, Louisiana State University lost 8,000 lab animals, and New Orleans colleges lost US$150m in federally funded research. Following Hurricane Ike in 2008, there were layoffs and a subsequent lawsuit at University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston.1 The ice storms during the 2008/09 winter season caused significant healthcare delivery challenges in the Midwest and North-East, and many areas suffered significant power outages. Most healthcare organisations in these areas have emergency management plans. Several of them also have disaster recovery plans for their information technology infrastructure. In some cases, however, this was not enough, and some institutions have come under intense scrutiny. It has been argued that current federal funding has created a number of stovepipe programmes that remain poorly integrated and evaluated.2 Faced with the mounting crisis in hospital operating theatres and emergency departments, it is difficult to create the scalable solutions necessary for today’s emergency manage- Journal of Business Continuity & Emergency Planning Vol. 4 No. 1, pp. 47–61 Henry Stewart Publications, 1749–9216 Page 47 Devlen:JCH page.qxd 04/12/2009 12:22 Page 48 How to build a BCP for a healthcare organisation Figure 1 Healthcare resiliency: an integrated approach of several disciplines Business continuity Disaster recovery Security/safety Crisis communications Risk management Emergency management ment and business continuity plans (BCPs). Yet it is essential to develop the critical infrastructure necessary for day-today emergencies in such a way that it can be scaled up to meet the needs of larger and more severe emergencies.3 The US Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) and Department of Homeland Security have recommended that critical infrastructure and key resources (CIKR) develop BCPs. Guidance was issued by DHHS to business and healthcare in response to the H1N1 outbreak,4 yet no formal BCP standards or model for implementation exist for healthcare. So how should business continuity be approached and how does it differ from emergency management? ALIGNING BUSINESS CONTINUITY WITH HEALTHCARE RESILIENCY Healthcare resiliency sits at the centre of an integrated approach of several disciplines (Figure 1). A comprehensive approach looks at measures taken to Page 48 ensure the continuity of critical business and clinical operations during an interruption or disaster, as well as the recovery and resumption of normal operations of the healthcare delivery systems. Business continuity planning is not solely about planning for the next sudden influx of patients (a surge plan) but also is about an integrated approach in preparing for a wide variety of events that may harm biomedical and IT systems, the physical plant, patients and staff. In the case of one state striving for hospitals to establish continuity of operations plans, hospitals were required to include a number of new elements in their emergency management plans, such as identification of essential functions necessary for continuity of operations and provision for devolution of essential functions should movement to another geographical location be required. The state also suggested plans should include documentation of critical systems; the hospitals’ capacity to perform essential functions given specific losses of staff and Devlen:JCH page.qxd 04/12/2009 12:22 Page 49 Devlen expertise; services and infrastructure alternatives; and disaster recovery needs with respect to communications and information systems. This reaches beyond the mass casualty focused plans of the past. As organisations continue to review lessons learned from events of recent years, it is becoming increasingly clear that, with tight operating budgets, narrow profit margins and increasing healthcare costs, the financial and operational impact of adverse events is causing more hospitals to reexamine the approach and effectiveness of their current preparedness and contingency planning. DEBILITATING MYTH Hospitals are commonly perceived as being good at emergency response; indeed, given the challenges they face on a daily basis, in many cases they outperform reasonable expectations. Nonetheless, existing emergency response plans have on a number of occasions proved inadequate. Plans focused on mass casualty incident planning alone do not provide a holistic approach to managing risk. Such plans fail to deliver a real strategy for mitigating the internal impact of events or comprehensive response to events requiring an accelerated and streamlined response. There is a misconception that current ‘internal’ disaster plans address the requirements of a BCP. Several emergency management programmes lack procedures for continuity of critical operations or recovery from an event. In October 2007, a survey of 1,055 healthcare facilities, with support from the Business Continuity Planning Workgroup for Healthcare Organizations (BCPWHO), was conducted to assess the level of preparedness from the perspective of US healthcare facilities.5 This survey was the first national benchmarking survey addressing both emergency management and business continuity for healthcare. Across the healthcare system, the research identified several areas of weakness in day-to-day operations that become magnified during an emergency and during the recovery phase. This was further illustrated by the comments regarding the 193 separate incidents that resulted in the activation of emergency operations centres over a three-year period (2004–07). The results indicate that most healthcare organisations, including but not limited to hospitals, long-term care facilities and healthcare centres, are struggling. While there are some successes, few know of appropriate avenues to share their success. Planning is being conducted in response to either mandates or vulnerability analyses, which are left open to interpretation, resulting in inconsistent implementation. There is a recurring request for standards or guidelines to define health system BCPs including nationally accepted metrics and performance measures. The goal of the present paper is to provide that starting point and offer guidance on how to develop a programme. REVOLUTIONARY POTENTIAL Between 1993 and 2003, visits to US emergency departments (EDs) increased by 26 per cent, to a total of 114 million visits annually.6 At the same time, the number of US EDs decreased by more than 400, and almost 200,000 inpatient hospital beds were taken out of service.7 ED overcrowding is a nationwide problem affecting the preparedness and safety of the healthcare system. As a result, hospitals are actively seeking models for patient flow, the management of daily surge capacity needs and developing operations improvement initiatives to streamline processes while reducing costs and patient risk. The integration of disci- Page 49 Devlen:JCH page.qxd 04/12/2009 12:22 Page 50 How to build a BCP for a healthcare organisation Table 1: How the phases of emergency management can be aligned with the components of business continuity Emergency management phase Business continuity component* Mitigation Risk assessment Business impact analysis Developing business continuity strategies Developing and implementing business continuity plans Awareness and training programmes Maintaining and exercising plans Crisis communications Coordination with external agencies Emergency response and operations Components of emergency response Roles and responsibilities: incident command HICS and the business continuity branch director Emergency operations centres Plan activation Recovery and resumption of normal hospital operations Preparedness Response Recovery *According to DRII Professional Practices plines that are stakeholders in these initiatives, along with a business continuity strategy that uses business impact analysis data, can go a long way to strengthen an emergency management programme as well as support hospital operations improvement initiatives. It is not only the mass casualty scenario with which hospitals need to be concerned. Indeed, as preparations for the autumn influenza season begin, many examples of lessons learned have emerged since the start of the H1N1 outbreak. Following assessments of several hospitals and health systems, preliminary findings point to recurring planning gaps in areas such as human resource policies, communications, supply-chain procedures and tracking capabilities with regards to personnel, vaccines and critical supplies. This demonstrates opportunities for process improvement and clinical processes beyond ED operations. Here is where business continuity holds enormous potential. Among the thousands of comments from the BCPWHO survey respondents, two broad themes emerged: first, the need Page 50 of understanding the role of business continuity to build a business case; secondly, the need for the methodology and tools to accomplish this work. To start, Table 1 provides a simple illustration of how emergency management phases can be aligned with the professional practices of business continuity. Next, the organisation’s need for a BCP can be determined. To know if the organisation needs to consider business continuity, conduct a brief assessment to determine how comprehensive the current plan is: • Can the organisation still write cheques if the finance staff have to be relocated? • Consider if the catheterisation lab, surgery or outpatient areas were inaccessible or if there was a fire in the pharmacy or a flood in the clinical labs area. How would the organisation resume normal business operations? What would be the financial and patient care impact? • Does current planning address the impact of events such as the lives of staff lost due to significant mortality-associ- Devlen:JCH page.qxd 04/12/2009 12:22 Page 51 Devlen ated injury or disease, or the need for some workers to attend to family illness or to children remaining at home due to school closures or an emergency condition that may require the transfer of essential functions to other personnel or possibly relocation site(s)? • Does the plan outline a comprehensive approach to ensure the continuity of essential services during an event, ensuring the safekeeping of records vital to the hospital and its patients, emergency acquisition of resources necessary for business resumption, and the capabilities to work at alternative sites until normal operations can be resumed? A ROADMAP: APPROACH AND DELIVERABLES Governance When a world-renowned ambulatory cancer care and research institute wanted to improve its existing emergency management plans to mitigate risk to patients, staff and institute operations, it developed a BCP.8 Integration between research and clinical care through clinical trials had become more complex, and the institute was becoming increasingly dependent on information technology. In order to manage risk in this rapidly-changing environment, it was essential to improve the institute’s ability to maintain its delivery of care to patients during critical incidents affecting the institute. However, business continuity in healthcare, particularly among providers, was not well established. This left the institute on its own to develop a model that addressed the unique challenges it faced. Unlike other industries which, during time of disaster, can relocate operations to an alternative site, healthcare providers need to maintain operations, if not increase their capacity. A programme with an integrated approach to addressing emergency management, business continuity, IT and physical security, and disaster recovery was therefore necessary. Governance was seen as a key starting point for the project manager and the chief operating officer. Together they created a project team and steering committee to spearhead the effort. The steering committee included the functional area vice presidents, the chief nursing officer and the chief information officer. The philosophy was based on the concept that leaders have to worry about business continuity and knit it into other work at their organisation, particularly people who deal with safety, operations and security. Integrating BCP with the organisation’s business, as opposed to a function off to the side, not only provides a strategy for risk mitigation but also for business effectiveness. Assessment The assessment dimension may be the most fluid in regards to style and approach. The hazard vulnerability analysis (HVA) methodology has been described as subjective and not always a true reflection of risk. Yet it is a required annual exercise for Joint Commission accredited facilities.9 With business impact analysis (BIA), previous methods have been difficult to translate when developing and conducting a questionnaire process for clinical and research areas. Understanding the impact on patient care and patient safety, in addition to financial impacts, continuously raises the question of how to measure it. Redefining the meaning of recovery timeframes in patient care settings is a recurring challenge as the traditional ‘relocate critical functions and recover’ strategy does not translate easily to intensive care units. To address the challenge of the ambiguity and subjectivity of the HVA, some Page 51 Devlen:JCH page.qxd 04/12/2009 12:22 Page 52 How to build a BCP for a healthcare organisation urban areas have formed coalitions of hospitals to collaborate on preparedness. In the case of Boston and Pittsburgh, for example, the hospitals selected and agreed to use a single HVA tool. Research was conducted to predetermine the probability scores of the various risks so that, as a region, the hospitals were measuring probability in a consistent manner. This meant the remaining HVA could then be completed in either of two ways: (1) a subcommittee could complete a regional-level HVA so that each hospital facility could benchmark its own risk level against the regional risk profile; or (2) the hospitals could take the standardised HVA with the pre-populated probability data and complete a facility-based risk profile for submission to the coalition. As all area hospitals were using the same tool, this collection procedure allowed for the data to be aggregated and rolled up to produce a regional risk profile. Hospitals are increasingly turning to BIAs. A typical ten-step BIA for healthcare settings would be as follows: 1. Scope definition. 2. Design standard data set (recovery times, applications, rating menu of scores from 1 to 5, etc). 3. Pre-establish recovery time objectives (avoid free-form text by using dropdown menus). 4. Identify impact categories (financial, reputation, research or clinical regulatory requirements, patient care, patient safety and/or patient satisfaction). 5. Design questions. 6. Run an informational workshop. 7. Conduct interviews/one-on-one meetings. 8. Aggregate data. 9. Organise and prioritise findings. 10. Create reports. The challenge has been to transfer a Page 52 process originally designed for private sector businesses into a patient care setting. Understanding that the BIA is a new process to many organisations, it is recommended that the questions should aim to gather very specific data, rather than attempt to answer every possible question the first time around. Choose a few specific areas such as identifying critical functions, dependencies, vital records and reliance on information technology. When developing the questions for the BIA, consider exactly what information is required and how it will be reported. This is an important agenda item early on for the steering committee. How will the impact of a disruption to a function be measured? Discuss impacts, not probability, and be consistent about the value being measured (eg by the hour, by the day) and if measuring by function or department. Rather than estimate the impact, ask questions that allow the data elements to be used in calculations that produce reports with more accurate data. In the case of one national healthcare system, the following questions were asked: • What is your daily departmental revenue? • What is the percentage productivity loss during outage per day? • What is the percentage of revenue lost (non-recoverable) per day? • What are your average annual employee costs? This allowed production of the following reports: • • • • • average cost per hour worked; average cost per employee day; lost productivity per employee; daily revenue loss; total cost of lost employee productivity; Devlen:JCH page.qxd 04/12/2009 12:22 Page 53 Devlen • total revenue loss during outage (which was graphed showing losses over time). Adhere to questions that result in measurable data to populate reports and use predetermined data sets. Deviating from this methodology will compromise data integrity. Avoid highly subjective questions such as ‘what is the maximum amount your process/department could be unavailable?’ It is preferable to create reports to measure impact and use that data for decision support, rather than have a department estimate how long it could be unavailable. Respondents should select from a dropdown menu of values rather than enter free-form text. By providing a rating, such as patient impact or the risk of a critical function being unavailable, it is possible to run ratings-based reports for the different functions and prioritise them with the steering committee. Once there is confidence in what the steering committee expects to be reported and the questionnaire is designed and tested, conduct workshops allowing representatives from each department to understand the project and the data to be gathered prior to the distribution of the questionnaire. After the BIA is distributed, meetings may also be held with individual departments to gather the data to complete the questionnaire. While labourintensive, this pays off as it increases awareness, understanding and governance. When this process was followed during a BIA for a large healthcare system, participants provided data that were significantly more useful than if they had completed the questionnaire without guidance. The BIA is also useful for dependency mapping — the documentation of vital elements of the organisation. Dependency mapping presents a greater opportunity to support improvement initiatives for key operations. What better way to use the BIA than to demonstrate single points of failure as well as the potential for unnecessary redundancy and risk currently built into clinical processes? The data can then be analysed and presented to the BCP steering committee where decisions can be made on priorities, risk mitigation measures and the scope of the programme. The BIA provides an interesting insight into the vast array of vital elements that are required in a healthcare and research environment, including: • Elements for research — crystals; — vials of plasma/serum/cells — biohazard considerations required for salvage operations; — unique mouse strains; — chemistry and haematology analysers. • Equipment — personal protective equipment for HAZMAT response. • Paper-based records — written clinical records; — personnel documents; — rare books, journals; — researcher notepads. In healthcare, it is not simply a question of ensuring the availability of workstations and alternative workspace, but also the relocation needs for research labs, pharmacies, clinical labs and more. Strategy While there are several new standards and recommendations in the various published reports, two things surface time and again — the healthcare sector knows what it is not doing in healthcare preparedness, but it is not clear exactly where it stands and how to accomplish the reoccurring recommendations. This is especially true with respect to business continuity. Page 53 Devlen:JCH page.qxd 04/12/2009 12:22 Page 54 End user How to build a BCP for a healthcare organisation Support Centre contacted (phone, e-mail. or web) NetOps Problem /incidence occurrence Incident closed Ascertain details, scope and impact of problem via internal IS triage. Updates GS ticket. Internally discovered problem Support centre GS ticket assign to responsible group Receives problem (call , e-mail , web) Incident critical or broad enough to page responsible group? (2) Questions user on details , scope and impact of problem ( questions to be developed ) ( 1 ) Page appropriate on-call pager using Escalation Matrix ( 3) Yes A B Incident impact on patient care >30 min? Yes NetOps, Tech or Apps Analyst No A Page received and acknowledged Review ticket and begin analysis Incident worked on B Update SC outgoing phone message ? (5) Figure 2 Downtime communication process Has incident expanded to more than one entity? Yes After action report/ review and periodic ticket reviews to look for trends No Yes IS mgmt and Incident Communicator discuss next level of escalation HSAMs Incident communication IS mgmt. Problem needs to be escalated? (7) Page 54 Yes Resolved Yes Hourly conference calls held for the duration of the incident and users updated hourly until resolved Initiate conference bridge ( 800 -866 0549 ID 8984040 ) (Technical, communication and Bus. Impact) ( 9) Send out e-mail, pages, NetHail messages, and/or phone call as appropriate to users and IS (96) Notify HSAMs and IS Sr. Mgmt . ( means TBD ) Two key elements will drive future strategy and further development of a recognised methodology. This effort has been undertaken by the Disaster Recovery Institute International (DRII), and at the time of writing, preparations were underway to launch the DRII curriculum and certification for healthcare business continuity planning. The second element is industry data analysis and benchmarking. Using the 2007 10 BCPWHO survey and the 2009 international benchmarking survey by BC Management,11 which includes a customised healthcare report, it is possible to leverage the experience of others described in the present paper along with the latest in education and benchmarking. Communicate to local entities (problem, anticipated length, impact, etc) (10) Work with entity management to determine if EMP process needed Notify end users of All Clear (e-mail, NetHail, phones, etc) Together they take the profession to a new level in healthcare. In the case of the cancer centre, following the BIA presentation to the steering committee, it was determined that, of the 62 departments, which include clinical, research and business departments, in addition to information services and telecommunications, the ten most critical departments (Pediatric and Adult Ambulatory Care, AIDS and Immunology Research, Network Affiliates, Core Clinical Laboratories, Environmental Health and Safety, Health Information Services, Experimental Medicine, Access Management, and the Animal Research Facility) would have comprehensive plans built out, with the remaining 52 creating Devlen:JCH page.qxd 04/12/2009 12:22 Page 55 Devlen shell plans to be built out as the programme matures. At this stage, do not neglect to integrate the BCP with emergency management and disaster recovery. Collaborate with the emergency management director and discuss what currently exists for departmental plans. When the team began looking at the ten departments listed above, they were quick to understand what previously existed and where there were opportunities to integrate the two. As the chief information officer sat on the steering committee, he was able to see the order of priority of the more than 100 applications his team supported and later drill down to the critical top 10 per cent when making decisions about disaster recovery strategies and assessing their IT capability against the now documented functional requirements. As hospitals begin to assess departmental strategies, discussions often centre on the reality that space is always at a premium and a traditional hot-site is insufficient for relocation of functions outside of IT. Mutual aid agreements with other labs, hospitals and universities must be considered. It is essential to consider all vital elements for operations as well as access to systems. Gaps are occasionally discovered, such as the lack of downtime procedures in the event applications are unavailable. So back-up paper copies are kept or recreated to write patient orders and admit patients. Communication and integration of incident command structures between hospitals and IT can go a long way towards resiliency, particularly in the case where IT is outsourced or a corporate function within a health system. In the case of the process used by a health system in Figure 2, once the affected entities are notified, Information Systems (IS) becomes part of the incident command team at the hospital as the hospital then activates its core emergency management team and they collectively strategise via a conference call. In the case of the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP), the BCP is integrated by engaging the clinicians responsible for patient care through their Monthly Downtime Task Force, which is made up of about 50 people from both the clinical and corporate sides.12 Additionally, CHOP actively tests strategies and tactics for dealing with planned and unplanned downtime by performing many tabletop disaster scenario exercises, including one very large exercise with 25 clinicians and business people and 55 IT people. To mitigate the likelihood of downtime, many hospital systems have redundancy built into them. In the 2007 BCPWHO survey, 62 per cent of healthcare organisations surveyed had comprehensive disaster recovery plans.13 To provide an enhanced application continuity solution, the most critical systems use high-availability storage and applications like Provider Order Entry and the Longitudinal Medical Record run on platforms that are completely replicated across the two data centres. Unlike businesses running a 9-to-5 operation, healthcare providers typically need their mission-critical applications to be available 24/7. Less critical applications with a 24 or 72-hour recovery time objective are candidates for drop-ship solutions or the use of servers that are housed in racks in an alternative data centre ready to be built on the fly in the event they are needed for recovery. Execution When one urban hospital was doing a complete overhaul of its emergency management plan, it looked for a way to collapse several separate plans into one. It had a hospital incident command system (HICS) manual; a continuity of operations plan that was based on the presidential Page 55 Devlen:JCH page.qxd 04/12/2009 12:22 Page 56 How to build a BCP for a healthcare organisation directive14 but not yet a customised BCP; the emergency management plan; separate policies in random manuals; and a separate and disconnected IT disaster recovery. To accomplish its goal, it therefore created one main binder for the emergency operations plan (EOP) that included various sections laid out and aligned with the HICS. For example, as the casualty care unit leader reports under the medical care branch director within operations, so there is an operations section to the EOP and the medical care branch tab details the procedures for the ED. Like most departments, it includes at a minimum the following: • updated ED plan with added evacuation/holding area procedures; • HICS chart; • casualty care unit leader job action sheet; • call lists for staff and critical vendors; • patient tracking form for evacuation; • patient care unit assessment form (rapid assessment of operational/clinical impact and needs for continuity of critical functions); • downtime procedures for critical IT systems. Further business continuity procedures are also included in the operations section of the EOP under the business continuity branch. For plan element considerations, please see the appendix. For any programme to be successful, an awareness and training programme is needed, as well as a schedule for maintaining and exercising the plan. Take exercises beyond the Joint Commission standards and be sure to include departments such as clinical support services, surgery and facilities as well as external agencies. Move past the mass casualty scenarios that test only emergency department response and consider scenarios that result in adverse Page 56 impact to hospital operations and patient care. CONCLUSION It is hoped that this paper will begin moving emergency management from being a compliance exercise to an evidence-based planning and health system that is truly prepared to meet any disruptive or interruptive possibility. This will lead to necessary action to effect changes and bring about more resilient healthcare preparedness across the board. APPENDIX: CONSIDERATIONS FOR HOSPITAL BUSINESS CONTINUITY Business continuity plan activation • Review of mission-critical functions for the organisation. • Evaluation of current staffing levels and resource deployment. • Notification of human resources, managers, union representatives and other key personnel as to status and plan implementation. • Notification of employees as to plan activation and process. • Implementation of alternative staff resource options. • Evaluation of immediate and ongoing staff needs based on existing and predicted levels of available human resources. Operational considerations Staff resources The objective of this plan for human resources is to ensure the execution of the hospital’s essential functions during any crisis and to provide for the safety and wellbeing of employees during any emergency when a sudden or ongoing and severe reduction in patient care services or Devlen:JCH page.qxd 04/12/2009 12:22 Page 57 Devlen in staff/human resources critical to the safe and effective operation of the organisation threatened occurs. Specific objectives of this plan include: • ensuring the continuous performance of essential functions during an emergency; • protecting the safety and productivity of working staff; • reducing or mitigating disruptions to operations; • addressing behavioural health issues that may affect the organisation; • planning for potentially critical losses of staff through scheduling, identification of alternative resources, and temporary business reduction efforts; • reducing loss of life and minimising damage and losses; • achieving a timely and orderly recovery from an emergency and resumption of full service to customers; • evaluation of current staffing levels and resource deployment; • onsite management of staffing levels by the administrative manager, delegated to department heads as needed every four hours. In preparation for the coverage needed in the event of a reduction in staffing or insufficient staff resources due to demand, cross-training should be provided to floor medical/surgical nursing staff, and advanced credentialing of physicians, nurses and other clinical professionals from non-essential disciplines to supplement the critical departments should be initiated. Clinical professionals would include: • physician groups, such as gastroenterology, plastic surgery etc; • retired MDs living in the community; • schools of nursing (obtain student contract agreements); • retired nurses; • school nurses in the community; • alumni nurses; • contract personnel. Personnel considerations • Evaluate potential health and safety issues. • Identify alternative staff options (eg contractors or other staff options that may alleviate problems resulting from staff loss). • Consider utilisation of staffing resources from within the community or health system as the priority, then contracted agencies as needed. • Identify alternative work options available through ‘telecommuting’ or other offsite possibilities. • Select non-clinical personnel who can be given the option of working offsite (at the discretion of the designated administrative manager). • Collaborate with IS to plan remote access process and identify applications needed. • Assess which applications have the capability of remote access, eg Meditech, ANSOS, Microsoft Outlook and Word. • Give written notification to employees. • Assess union issues surrounding overtime issues and disaster support/sharing of responsibilities among workers. • Meet with union representatives to discuss relevant issues, such as: — language for asking staff availability; — offering incentive programmes; — utilising external agencies; — reviewing four-hour mandatory rule. • Plan to re-deploy staff as needed, offering staff cross-training in specific areas. • Assess extra resources within hospital and within health system. • Train workers on an annual basis with regard to contingency planning and the need for personal backup plans for transportation, family needs, etc. Page 57 Devlen:JCH page.qxd 04/12/2009 12:22 Page 58 How to build a BCP for a healthcare organisation • Assess core competencies of all employees. • Identify similar core competencies that exist, for example, endoscopy, post anaesthesia care unit (PACU), catheterisation lab, etc. • Provide cross-training of staff with similar competencies. Family needs • Offer support to employees, child care centre and arrangements to stay over if needed. • Work with housekeeping to set up space for overnight arrangements. • Identify available space that could be utilised (eg athletic club, outpatient and ancillary areas that could be closed and deployed for inpatient needs if necessary). • Develop plan for food services to accommodate staff staying overnight and working extra shifts. Hospital operations The business continuity strategy for clinical operations identifies how the hospital will identify and conduct essential operations during periods of severe staff reduction. The plan for devolution of essential functions includes the identification of mission-critical systems; capabilities to perform essential functions given specific losses of staff and expertise; reliable logistical support, services and infrastructure alternatives; consideration of health, safety and emotional wellbeing of personnel; communications between staff, and related computer/software issues. Essential functions may include: • Administrative — accounting (payroll). • Clinical operations — anaesthesiology/operative services; — behavioural health services; — emergency department; Page 58 — intensive care unit; — medical/surgical inpatient units; — obstetrics services; — pathology/morgue staff; — paediatric services. • Clinical support services — spiritual services; — registration/patient access; — infection control. Operational objectives of the business continuity strategy include: • identification of critical operation points, functions or processes necessary for continuity of operations (eg management staff; specific levels of expertise, training or experience; recording or documentation requirements; health and safety concerns), which may be necessary for business to continue and for staff to provide patient care services; • plan for service reduction based on need, critical nature of function as a support for organisation or local population and other factors; • evaluation of potential health and safety issues that might arise through diversion of staff to new job roles and loss of critical staff in various operational positions; • liability assessment by general counsel; • identification of contractors or other staff options that may alleviate problems resulting from staff loss; • identification of work options available through telecommuting or other offsite possibilities; • assessment of flexible leave options that would allow employees to address family needs while continuing to support the employing organisation through a flexible work plan where feasible; • written notification to employees regarding employed business continuity strategies for the duration of the event Devlen:JCH page.qxd 04/12/2009 12:22 Page 59 Devlen hospital functions, to the detriment of the legal or financial rights or entitlements of the organisation or of the affected individuals. Examples of this category of vital records are: — accounts receivable; — contracting and acquisition files; — official personnel files; — payroll records; — insurance records; — property management and inventory records. and compensation provisions, if feasible; • assessment of union issues surrounding overtime issues and disaster support/sharing of responsibilities among workers; • training of workers on an annual basis with regard to business continuity planning and the need for personal backup plans for transportation, family needs, etc. Vital records and databases Personnel will be deployed during an emergency to ensure the protection and ready availability of electronic and hardcopy documents, references, records and information systems needed to support essential functions under the full spectrum of emergencies. Hospital personnel must be identified before an emergency in order to have full access to records and systems to conduct their essential functions. Essential records may include: • Emergency operating records: Vital records, regardless of media, essential to the continued functioning or reconstitution of a hospital/organisation during and after an emergency. Included are emergency plans and directives; orders of succession; delegations of authority; staffing assignments; and related records of a policy or procedural nature that provide staff with the guidance and information resources necessary for conducting operations during an emergency, and for resuming formal operations at its conclusion. • Legal and financial records: Vital records, regardless of media, critical to carrying out an organisation’s essential legal and financial functions and activities, and protecting the legal and financial rights of individuals directly affected by its activities. Included are records having such value that their loss would significantly impair the conduct of essential Each operational area will account for identification and protection of vital records, systems and data management software and equipment, to include classified or sensitive data as applicable, necessary to perform essential functions and activities, and to reconstitute normal operations after the emergency. Communications Communications systems including cell phones, e-mail, pagers and similar mechanisms should be evaluated for interoperability and flexible exchange of use across the hospital where feasible. Cell phone numbers, e-mail addresses and other information should be readily available to all staff that may be redeployed, and contact information outside the hospital necessary to core operations also made available where feasible for internal use and continuity of operations. Communication is one of the most critical components of a hospital’s disaster response capabilities. In this regard, the command centre, communication centre and information systems must work together to maximise the effectiveness of the following communication systems: • • • • telephone system; Nextel phone; two-way radios; VHF radios for centralised emergency Page 59 Devlen:JCH page.qxd 04/12/2009 12:22 Page 60 How to build a BCP for a healthcare organisation • • • • • • medical dispatch (C-MED) communication; computerised communication (e-mail); cellular phones; pay telephones (non-PBX); fax machines (Centrix lines — nonPBX); intercom systems; pagers/beepers. Important considerations for different functions • IT — medical records; — accessing data; — editing records; — electronic authentication of records; — transcription services. • Laboratory systems — ordering tests; — reviewing results. • Radiology systems — picture archiving and communication systems (PACS); — radiology; — ordering tests; — reviewing results. • Medication management — ordering medications; — viewing patient medication profiles; — medication dispensing; — medication reconciliation. • Patient management — registration; — patient tracking and location; — bed management; — patient information. • Scheduling of resources — operating theatre; — radiology; — clinic; — interpreter services; — laboratory services; — pharmacy; — radiology; — respiratory. • Logistics/support services Page 60 • • • • — employee health services; — food services; — laundry; — maintenance; — materials distribution — shipping and receiving; — purchasing and material management; — security; — information systems; — telecommunications. Processing claims for reimbursement — diagnosis and procedure coding; — charge capture; — electronic claim submission systems; — automated billing applications. Patient clinical monitoring systems — telemetry; — remote monitoring systems; — computer physician order entry. Non-patient related systems — human resources; — supply-chain management; — food service application; — environmental care applications; — medical staff credentialing; — clinical staff competency tracking. Enterprise-wide communications — intranet and extranet sites; — paging systems; — network storage and archiving; — mail services; — internet access; — clinical databases; — scheduling. REFERENCES (1) Institute for Southern Studies (2009) ‘University of Texas settles lawsuit over post-Ike layoffs’, Facing South (online magazine for the Institute of Southern Studies), available at: http://www.southernstudies.org/2009/0 4/university-of-texas-settles-lawsuitover-post-ike-layoffs.html (2) American Medical Association and American Public Health Association Devlen:JCH page.qxd 04/12/2009 12:22 Page 61 Devlen (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (2007) ‘Improving health system preparedness for terrorism and mass casualty events: Recommendations for action’, available at: http://www.amaassn.org/ama1/pub/upload/mm/415/fin al_summit_report.pdf (accessed 1st December, 2007). Ibid., p. 1. See: http://www.flu.gov/professional/ pdf/cikrpandemicinfluenzaguide.pdf and http://www.flu.gov/professional/ hospital/homehealthcare.pdf (accessed 1st October, 2009). Davey, J., Devlen, A. and Skinner, R. (2008) ‘Are We Ready? The BCPWHO Survey on Disaster Preparedness of US Healthcare Facilities’, presentation at the National Emergency Management Summit, 3rd–5th February, Washington, DC, available at: http://www.bcpwho.org/presentations/ 100a.htm (accessed 23rd October, 2009). McCaig, L. F., Burt, C. W. (2005) ‘National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2003 Emergency Department Summary’, Advance data from vital and health statistics, No. 358. p. 2, National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, Maryland. Ibid. Devlen, A. (2005) ‘Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and BCP: The Cure for Disruption’, Continuity Insights, (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) May/June, available at: http://www.continuityinsights.com/ Magazine/Issue_Archives/2005/0506/dana.html (accessed 23rd October, 2009). Joint Commission (2007) ‘Comprehensive Accreditation Manual for Hospitals: The Official Handbook’, (EC.4.11-EC.4.20), The Joint Commission. Davey et al, ref. 5 above. BC Management (2009) ‘International Business Continuity Program Management Benchmarking Report: An Executive Summary, BC Management, Huntington Beach, CA, July, available at: http://www.bcmanagement.com/ research/files/BCMIntlProgramMgmt BenchmarkingReportSummary.pdf (accessed 1st October, 2009). Rojas, B. (2008) ‘Children's Hospital of Philadelphia: BCP Lives Here Issue’, Continuity Insights, January/February, available at: http://www.continuity insights.com/Magazine/Issue_Archives/ 2008/01-02/chop_bcp.html (accessed 1st October, 2009). Davey et al, ref. 5 above. Bush, G. (2007) ‘Homeland Security Presidential Directive-21’, The White House, available at: http://www.fas.org/ irp/offdocs/nspd/hspd-21.htm (accessed 1st October, 2009). Page 61
© Copyright 2024