How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return BVR’s Advanced Webinar Series on DLOMs: Part 2 How to Quantify and Support Discounts for Lack of Marketability using Rates of Return Featuring: Bruce A. Johnson, ASA Munroe, Park & Johnson 1 [email protected] © 2013 Munroe, Park & Johnson, Inc. How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return Speaker Introduction Bruce A. Johnson, ASA is a partner in the business valuation firm of Munroe, Park and Johnson, Inc. He holds a degree in engineering and MBA from Texas A&M University. He is a member of the Business Valuation Committee of the American Society of Appraisers. He was the expert witness for the taxpayer in the Estate of Elsie J. Church and Estate of Emily Klauss. He has written multiple publications on discounts for lack of marketability, S Corp tax issues and the valuation of family limited partnerships. 2 [email protected] © 2013 Munroe, Park & Johnson, Inc. How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return © 2013 Business Valuation Resources, LLC How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return Overview Discounts for lack of marketability occur in third party transactions (restricted stocks, IPOs, private transactions) because investors recognize that the lack of marketability of an interest increases the risk of an investment in the interest. As a result, an investor purchases the privately held interest at a discount in order to increase the rate of return on their investment. This increased rate of return offsets the additional risk caused by the illiquidity of the investment. This webinar will discuss how to take the concept and use it to quantify and support your discount for lack of marketability in a business appraisal. 3 [email protected] © 2013 Munroe, Park & Johnson, Inc. How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return Seminar Overview • • • • • • • Overview What is a Discount for Lack of Marketability? • The Basics • What causes DLOMs in third party transactions • Court Cases and Quotes Examination of Historical Studies • Restricted Stock Studies • IPO Studies Methodology to Use Rates of Return to Determine the DLOM Studies Supporting Incremental Increase • Public vs. Private Equity Returns • Restricted Stock Returns • Long Term vs. Short Term Bonds Case Studies Conclusion [email protected] © 2013 Munroe, Park & Johnson, Inc. 4 How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return © 2013 Business Valuation Resources, LLC How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return Three Approaches to Value • Income Approach • Market Approach • Asset Based (or Cost) Approach 5 [email protected] © 2013 Munroe, Park & Johnson, Inc. How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return Income Approach Empirical Method • Capitalization of Net Cash Flow • Discounted Net Cash Flow 6 [email protected] © 2013 Munroe, Park & Johnson, Inc. How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return © 2013 Business Valuation Resources, LLC How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return Market Approach Empirical Method • Price to Earnings • MVIC to EBITDA • Price to NAV 7 [email protected] © 2013 Munroe, Park & Johnson, Inc. How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return Cost Approach Not typically used to value a Noncontrolling Interest 8 [email protected] © 2013 Munroe, Park & Johnson, Inc. How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return © 2013 Business Valuation Resources, LLC How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return Inappropriate for Noncontrolling Interests The subject ownership interest should be able to cause the sale of the company’s assets ... Accordingly, the NAV method is more appropriate for valuing controlling interests than minority interests. PPC Guide to Business Valuations 9 [email protected] © 2013 Munroe, Park & Johnson, Inc. How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return Traditional Method 10 [email protected] © 2013 Munroe, Park & Johnson, Inc. How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return © 2013 Business Valuation Resources, LLC How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return Discount for Lack of Marketability • Traditional Method is Based on Averages from: • • Restricted Stock Studies IPO/Private Placement Studies 11 [email protected] © 2013 Munroe, Park & Johnson, Inc. How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return Restricted Stock Studies Years Studied 1966-1969 1968-1970 1969-1972 1969-1973 1968-1972 1978-1982 1981-1984 1981-1988 1979-1992 1991-1995 1996-1997 1997-1998 Name of Study SEC Institutional Investor Milton Gelman Robert E. Moroney J. Michael Maher Robert Trout Standard Research Consultants Willamette Management Assoc William L. Silber FMV Opinions, Inc. Bruce A. Johnson Columbia Financial Advisors Columbia Financial Advisors Average Number of Discount Transactions 0.258 398 33.0% 89 35.6% 146 35.4% na 33.5% 60 45.0% * 28 31.2% * 33 33.8% 69 23.0% 100 20.0% 72 21.0% 23 13.0% 15 * denotes median 12 [email protected] © 2013 Munroe, Park & Johnson, Inc. How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return © 2013 Business Valuation Resources, LLC How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return Johnson Restricted Stock Study Sorted by Current Year Net Income Positive net income Negative net income Sorted by Previous Year Net Income Positive net income Negative net income Sorted by Sales Current Year Greater than $12.7M Less than $12.7M Sorted by Transaction Value Greater than $8.3M Less than $8.3M Average Std Dev 16% 23% 12% 17% 16% 23% 13% 17% 18% 22% 14% 17% 16% 25% 14% 16% 13 How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return [email protected] © 2013 Munroe, Park & Johnson, Inc. IPO Studies Emory Studies Study Mean 1996-1997 1994-1995 1992-1993 1990-1992 1989-1990 1987-1989 1985-1986 1980-1981 43% 45% 45% 42% 45% 45% 43% 60% Median 42% 45% 44% 40% 40% 45% 43% 66% 14 [email protected] © 2013 Munroe, Park & Johnson, Inc. How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return © 2013 Business Valuation Resources, LLC How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return Prior Court Rulings • Some appraisers improperly rely on prior court rulings to derive discounts for lack of control and lack of marketability. • The IRS frequently cites prior court case rulings at the appeals level to support levels of discounts. 15 [email protected] © 2013 Munroe, Park & Johnson, Inc. How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return Court Scrutiny of DLOM • 2003 - Estate of Peracchio: [the taxpayer’s expert] makes no attempt whatsoever to analyze the data from those [restricted stock] studies as they relate to the transferred interests. Rather, he simply lists the average discounts … asking us to accept on faith the premise that the approximate average of those results provides a reliable benchmark for the transferred interests. Absent any analytical support, we are unable to accept that premise …” 16 [email protected] © 2013 Munroe, Park & Johnson, Inc. How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return © 2013 Business Valuation Resources, LLC How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return Court Scrutiny of DLOM • 2005 – Kelley v. Commissioner: “… [the taxpayer’s appraiser] did not analyze the data from these [DLOM] studies…therefore we cannot accept the premise that this average discount [for lack of marketability] is appropriate.” 17 [email protected] © 2013 Munroe, Park & Johnson, Inc. How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return Tax Courts Wants More The primary objection of the Tax Court has been the lack of rationale used to support discounts for lack of control and lack of marketability. It is not a question of whether discounts … are appropriate. It is how the amounts of these discounts have been determined that has raised concerns. Comprehensive Guide for the Valuation of Family Limited Partnerships, 2nd Ed., 2. 18 [email protected] © 2013 Munroe, Park & Johnson, Inc. How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return © 2013 Business Valuation Resources, LLC How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return Discount for Lack of Marketability 19 [email protected] © 2013 Munroe, Park & Johnson, Inc. How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return Discount for Lack of Marketability • Income Approach used rates of return from publicly held investments • Market Approach used pricing multiples (Price to NAV ratios) from publicly held investments • Both approaches result in a value estimate “as if marketable” • Need to adjust for lack of marketability 20 [email protected] © 2013 Munroe, Park & Johnson, Inc. How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return © 2013 Business Valuation Resources, LLC How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return Discount for Lack of Marketability You can sell any asset, no matter how illiquid it is perceived to be, if you are willing to accept a lower price for it. Consequently, we should not categorize assets into liquid and illiquid assets but allow for a continuum on liquidity… Aswath Damodaran NYU Stern School of Business 21 [email protected] © 2013 Munroe, Park & Johnson, Inc. How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return Discount for Lack of Marketability Adjustment for lack of marketability can be accomplished by: • The application of a discount for lack of marketability • Increasing the required return to compensate for the increased risk of the illiquid investment 22 [email protected] © 2013 Munroe, Park & Johnson, Inc. How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return © 2013 Business Valuation Resources, LLC How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return Discount for Lack of Marketability The application of a discount for lack of marketability results in an increase in the effective rate of return of the investment. 23 [email protected] © 2013 Munroe, Park & Johnson, Inc. How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return Marketability Discount 101 Noncontrolling, Marketable Value DLOM $100 20.0% Noncontrolling, Nonmarketable Value ($20) $80 24 [email protected] © 2013 Munroe, Park & Johnson, Inc. How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return © 2013 Business Valuation Resources, LLC How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return Application of DLOM Impact on Rate of Return Price Income Return Noncontrolling, Marketable Value $100 DLOM 20.0% Noncontrolling, Nonmarketable Value $80 $12 12.0% $12 15.0% 25 [email protected] © 2013 Munroe, Park & Johnson, Inc. How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return Question Consider the following two alternative investments: 1. Noncontrolling, marketable interest yielding a 12% return 2. Noncontrolling, nonmarketable interest yielding a 12% return Which investment is more attractive? 26 [email protected] © 2013 Munroe, Park & Johnson, Inc. How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return © 2013 Business Valuation Resources, LLC How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return Question How much greater return is required on the nonmarketable interest for it to be as desirable to an investor as the marketable interest yielding a 12% return? 27 [email protected] © 2013 Munroe, Park & Johnson, Inc. How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return Discount for Lack of Marketability We are faced with the same question when valuing a privately held interest in a privately held company. 28 [email protected] © 2013 Munroe, Park & Johnson, Inc. How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return © 2013 Business Valuation Resources, LLC How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return Empirical Data Three research studies indicate that investors generally require a 30% to 45% increase in their rate of return above a marketable interest when an interest is not marketable. 29 How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return [email protected] © 2013 Munroe, Park & Johnson, Inc. Study A Private Equity vs. Public Equity Returns 30 [email protected] © 2013 Munroe, Park & Johnson, Inc. How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return © 2013 Business Valuation Resources, LLC How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return Discount for Lack of Marketability What if we could compare the historical returns of publicly traded stock to privately held stock? 31 [email protected] © 2013 Munroe, Park & Johnson, Inc. How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return Discount for Lack of Marketability This would enable us to quantify a range or benchmark that investors require for illiquidity. 32 [email protected] © 2013 Munroe, Park & Johnson, Inc. How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return © 2013 Business Valuation Resources, LLC How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return Comparison of Returns Publicly Traded Equity – Ibbotson’s Stocks Bonds Bills and Inflation Private Held Equity – Cambridge Associates LLC U.S. Venture Capital Index® 33 [email protected] © 2013 Munroe, Park & Johnson, Inc. How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return Cambridge Associates LLC U.S. Venture Capital Index® Cambridge Associates, LLC created a database to monitor investments made by venture capital and other alternative asset partnerships. It measures the average aggregated return for venture capital investments over the past 25 years. 34 [email protected] © 2013 Munroe, Park & Johnson, Inc. How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return © 2013 Business Valuation Resources, LLC How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return Cambridge Associates LLC U.S. Venture Capital Index® • 1,298 entities as of December 31, 2010 • The end to end pooled mean performance calculation is similar to the IRR, however it is measuring the return between two points in time. The calculation takes into account the beginning NAV as the initial investment. • Return is based on cash flows to investors net of fees and fund expenses. 35 [email protected] © 2013 Munroe, Park & Johnson, Inc. How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return National Venture Capital Association “Limited partners make these investments in venture funds knowing that the investment will be long-term. It may take several years before the first investments start to return proceeds; in many cases the invested capital may be tied up in an investment for seven to ten years. Limited partners understand that this illiquidity must be factored into their investment decision.” Source: www.nvca.org 36 [email protected] © 2013 Munroe, Park & Johnson, Inc. How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return © 2013 Business Valuation Resources, LLC How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return National Venture Capital Association “Venture capitalists will help companies grow, but they eventually seek to exit the investment in three to seven years. An early stage investment make take seven to ten years to mature, while a later stage investment many only take a few years, so the appetite for the investment life cycle must be congruent with the limited partnerships’ appetite for liquidity. The venture investment is neither a short term nor a liquid investment, but an investment that must be made with careful diligence and expertise.” Source: www.nvca.org 37 [email protected] © 2013 Munroe, Park & Johnson, Inc. How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return National Venture Capital Association Life Cycle Stages Seed Capital – investment made before there is a real product or company organized Early Stage – investment made in first or second stage of development Balanced Stage – financing provided for growth Late Stage - providing financing to help the company grow to a critical mass to attract public financing through a stock offering 38 [email protected] © 2013 Munroe, Park & Johnson, Inc. How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return © 2013 Business Valuation Resources, LLC How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return Venture Capital Returns • Ideally, we would like to examine funds with Longest Holding Period • These funds would include Seed and Early Stage funds • However, these funds may also contain additional risks – other than liquidity • Cambridge Study comprised of 863 early stage, 168 late/expansion stage, 264 multi stage and 3 venture debt funds 39 [email protected] © 2013 Munroe, Park & Johnson, Inc. How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return Arithmetic Historical Returns 25 Years Privately Held Stocks 18.7% * Publicly Traded Small Stocks 12.9% ** * Source: Cambridge Associates LLC U.S. Venture Capital Index® ** Source: Ibbotson Associates' Stocks Bonds Bills and Inflation, 2011 40 [email protected] © 2013 Munroe, Park & Johnson, Inc. How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return © 2013 Business Valuation Resources, LLC How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return Historical Return Requirement 25 Years Privately Held Stocks Publicly Traded Small Stocks 18.7% 12.9% Difference 5.8% Incremental Return as a Percent 45.2% Partnership Profiles, Inc. – 4th Edition FLP Book 41 How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return [email protected] © 2013 Munroe, Park & Johnson, Inc. Study B Restricted Stock Returns 42 [email protected] © 2013 Munroe, Park & Johnson, Inc. How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return © 2013 Business Valuation Resources, LLC How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return Historical Returns for Restricted Stock An examination was conducted of the underlying data used in a restricted stock study that was published in the December 1999 issue of Shannon Pratt’s Business Valuation Update. The study examined 72 restricted stock transactions that occurred prior to 1995. 43 [email protected] © 2013 Munroe, Park & Johnson, Inc. How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return Restricted Stock Restricted stock of a public company is identical to its counterpart that is traded on a major exchange except that restricted stock cannot be openly traded for a designated period of time. 44 [email protected] © 2013 Munroe, Park & Johnson, Inc. How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return © 2013 Business Valuation Resources, LLC How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return Restricted Stock Prior to 1990, the stock of small companies could be sold by a public company without making a public offering. The securities sold in this type of transaction were subject to certain restrictions which stated that the stock could not be resold without being registered with the SEC or qualifying for a Rule 144 exemption. Originally, Rule 144 allowed the limited resale of unregistered, restricted securities after a holding period of 2 years. 45 [email protected] © 2013 Munroe, Park & Johnson, Inc. How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return Restrictions Eased & Discounts Declined Rule 144A - In 1990, the SEC implemented new regulations that allowed qualified institutional investors to trade restricted stock among themselves without filing registration documents. This created a limited market for restricted stocks and thereby increased liquidity. In 1997, the SEC reduced the Rule 144 holding period from 2 years to 1 year. This change further increased the liquidity of restricted stocks. 46 [email protected] © 2013 Munroe, Park & Johnson, Inc. How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return © 2013 Business Valuation Resources, LLC How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return Restricted Stock Studies Years Studied 1966-1969 1968-1970 1969-1972 1969-1973 1968-1972 1978-1982 1981-1984 1981-1988 1979-1992 1991-1995 1996-1997 1997-1998 Name of Study SEC Institutional Investor Milton Gelman Robert E. Moroney J. Michael Maher Robert Trout Standard Research Consultants Willamette Management Assoc William L. Silber FMV Opinions, Inc. Bruce A. Johnson Columbia Financial Advisors Columbia Financial Advisors Average Discount 25.8% 33.0% 35.6% 35.4% 33.5% 45.0% * 31.2% * 33.8% 23.0% 20.0% 21.0% 13.0% Discounts Declined 47 * denotes median How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return [email protected] © 2013 Munroe, Park & Johnson, Inc. Restricted Stock Return Publicly Traded Return EPS / Publicly Traded Price = Marketable Return Restricted Stock Return EPS / Restricted Stock Price = Illiquid Return Increase in Return (Illiquid Return/Marketable Return) - 1 = Percent Increase 48 [email protected] © 2013 Munroe, Park & Johnson, Inc. How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return © 2013 Business Valuation Resources, LLC How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return Historical Return Requirement For the 25 transactions for which information was available, the average increase between the return using the restricted stock price and the return using the publicly traded price was 29.5%. Partnership Profiles, Inc. – 4th Edition FLP Book, 131. 49 How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return [email protected] © 2013 Munroe, Park & Johnson, Inc. Study C Long Term vs. Short Term Government Bond Returns (Horizon Risk) 50 [email protected] © 2013 Munroe, Park & Johnson, Inc. How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return © 2013 Business Valuation Resources, LLC How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return Long v. Short Term Government Bonds • Equivalent risk of principal at maturity • Long term bond is exposed to greater interim risk due to market fluctuations • The increase in risk results in an increased required rate of return • For a long term bond to be equally marketable, investors generally demand an increase in the rate of return 51 How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return [email protected] © 2013 Munroe, Park & Johnson, Inc. 30 Year Comparison 16.00% 14.00% 12.00% 20 Yr Government Bond 10.00% 8.00% 6.00% 4.00% 3 Mo Treasury Bill 2.00% 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 1984 1983 1982 1981 1980 0.00% 52 [email protected] © 2013 Munroe, Park & Johnson, Inc. How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return © 2013 Business Valuation Resources, LLC How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return Average Differential 20 Year Treasury Bond 3 Month Treasury Bill Incremental Increase 30 Year Average 7.2% 5.2% 2.0% 35 Year Average 7.4% 5.5% 1.8% 40 Year Average 7.3% 5.6% 1.7% 39.3% 32.9% 30.8% Average Differential Average Percentage Increase 1.9% 34.3% 53 How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return [email protected] © 2013 Munroe, Park & Johnson, Inc. Long v. Short Term Bonds Principal Income Yield $1,000 $52 5.2% 20 Year Treasury Bond $732 $52 7.1% Effective discount -26.8% 3 Month Treasury Bill 54 [email protected] © 2013 Munroe, Park & Johnson, Inc. How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return © 2013 Business Valuation Resources, LLC How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return Benchmark for Increase in Return Increased Yield 1.9% Divided by Short Term Rate = 36.5% 5.2% Partnership Profiles, Inc. – Sample Report #11, 40. 55 [email protected] © 2013 Munroe, Park & Johnson, Inc. How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return Summary of 3 Studies Studies Private Equity vs. Public Equity Returns Restricted Stock Transactions LT vs. ST Bond Horizon Risk Average Incr Return 45.2% 29.5% 34.3% Note: These are not discounts. They are a percentage increase in the rate of return to compensate for the risk of illiquidity. 56 [email protected] © 2013 Munroe, Park & Johnson, Inc. How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return © 2013 Business Valuation Resources, LLC How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return Conclusion The increase in the rate of return should be 30% to 45%. 57 [email protected] © 2013 Munroe, Park & Johnson, Inc. How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return Case Study 1 Capitalization of NCF Noncontrolling, Marketable Value = $125,000 per share Annual Cash Flow = $21,250 per share Noncontrolling, Nonmarketable Value = ? 58 [email protected] © 2013 Munroe, Park & Johnson, Inc. How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return © 2013 Business Valuation Resources, LLC How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return Yield Calculation Using the Annual NCF Noncontrolling, Mktble Value Yield Calculation: $21,250 / $125,000 = Value $125,000 17.0% 59 [email protected] © 2013 Munroe, Park & Johnson, Inc. How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return Yield Calculation Using the Annual NCF How much of a DLOM must be deducted to increase the rate of return from 17.0% to a level that is 30% to 45% higher? 60 [email protected] © 2013 Munroe, Park & Johnson, Inc. How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return © 2013 Business Valuation Resources, LLC How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return Yield Calculation Using the Annual NCF Value After DLOM DLOM ROR % Increase 0% $125,000 17.0% 15% $106,250 20.0% 17.6% 20% $100,000 21.3% 25.0% 25% $93,750 22.7% 33.3% 30% $87,500 24.3% 42.9% 35% $81,250 26.2% 53.8% 40% $75,000 28.3% 66.7% 61 [email protected] © 2013 Munroe, Park & Johnson, Inc. How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return Goal = 30% to 45% Increase Studies Private Equity vs. Public Equity Returns Restricted Stock Transactions LT vs. ST Bond Horizon Risk Average Incr Return 45.2% 29.5% 34.3% Note: These are not discounts. They are a percentage increase in the rate of return to compensate for the risk of illiquidity. 62 [email protected] © 2013 Munroe, Park & Johnson, Inc. How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return © 2013 Business Valuation Resources, LLC How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return Yield Calculation Using the Annual NCF Value After DLOM DLOM ROR % Increase 0% $125,000 17.0% 15% $106,250 20.0% 17.6% 20% $100,000 21.3% 25.0% 25% $93,750 22.7% 33.3% 30% $87,500 24.3% 42.9% 35% $81,250 26.2% 53.8% 40% $75,000 28.3% 66.7% 63 [email protected] © 2013 Munroe, Park & Johnson, Inc. How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return Yield Calculation Using the Annual NCF Value Noncontrolling, Mktble Value $125,000 Less DLOM 25% ($31,250) Noncontrolling, Nonmktble Value $93,750 64 [email protected] © 2013 Munroe, Park & Johnson, Inc. How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return © 2013 Business Valuation Resources, LLC How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return Yield Calculation Using the Annual NCF Noncontrolling, Mktble Value 25% LOM Discount Value Return $125,000 17.0% $93,750 22.7% 65 [email protected] © 2013 Munroe, Park & Johnson, Inc. How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return Yield Calculation Using the Annual NCF Value Noncontrolling, Mktble Value $125,000 Less DLOM 30% ($37,500) Noncontrolling, Nonmktble Value $87,500 66 [email protected] © 2013 Munroe, Park & Johnson, Inc. How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return © 2013 Business Valuation Resources, LLC How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return Yield Calculation Using the Annual NCF Noncontrolling, Mktble Value 30% LOM Discount Value Return $125,000 17.0% $87,500 24.3% 67 [email protected] © 2013 Munroe, Park & Johnson, Inc. How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return Case Study 2 Discounted NCF Noncontrolling, Marketable Value = $200,000 per share Annual Cash Flow = 5 Year Projection Noncontrolling, Nonmarketable Value = ? 68 [email protected] © 2013 Munroe, Park & Johnson, Inc. How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return © 2013 Business Valuation Resources, LLC How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return Case Study 2 Income Approach – 5 Year Model Annual NCF EPS Growth 2013 $30,000 2014 $33,000 10.0% 2015 $34,650 5.0% 2016 $35,690 3.0% 2017 $36,760 3.0% 69 How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return [email protected] © 2013 Munroe, Park & Johnson, Inc. ROR Prior to DLOM Noncontrolling, Marketable Value = $200,000 Internal Rat 17.9% Year 1 NCF Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 $30,000 $33,000 $34,650 $35,690 Year 5 Terminal $36,760 $216,236 70 [email protected] © 2013 Munroe, Park & Johnson, Inc. How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return © 2013 Business Valuation Resources, LLC How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return Mechanics Noncontrolling, Marketable Value = $200,000 Internal Rate of Return 17.9% Year 0 NCF Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 ($200,000) $30,000 $33,000 $34,650 $35,690 $252,996 71 [email protected] © 2013 Munroe, Park & Johnson, Inc. How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return NCF Calculation How much of a DLOM must be deducted to increase the rate of return from 17.9% to a level that is 30% to 45% higher? 72 [email protected] © 2013 Munroe, Park & Johnson, Inc. How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return © 2013 Business Valuation Resources, LLC How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return Case Study 2 Income Approach – 5 Year Model Value After DLOM $200,000 $170,000 $160,000 $150,000 $140,000 DLOM 15% 20% 25% 30% ROR 17.9% 23.1% 25.1% 27.3% 29.7% % Increase 29.0% 40.3% 52.7% 66.4% 73 How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return [email protected] © 2013 Munroe, Park & Johnson, Inc. Case Study 2 Income Approach – 5 Year Model DLOM 15% 20% 25% 30% Value After DLOM $200,000 $170,000 $160,000 $150,000 $140,000 ROR 17.9% 23.1% 25.1% 27.3% 29.7% Noncontrolling, Nonmktble Value ($200,000) ($170,000) ($160,000) ($150,000) ($140,000) 2013 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 2014 $33,000 $33,000 $33,000 $33,000 $33,000 2015 $34,650 $34,650 $34,650 $34,650 $34,650 2016 $35,690 $35,690 $35,690 $35,690 $35,690 2017 $252,997 $252,997 $252,997 $252,997 $252,997 74 [email protected] © 2013 Munroe, Park & Johnson, Inc. How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return © 2013 Business Valuation Resources, LLC How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return Goal = 30% to 45% Increase Average Incr Return Studies Private Equity vs. Public Equity Returns Restricted Stock Transactions LT vs. ST Bond Horizon Risk 45.2% 29.5% 34.3% Note: These are not discounts. They are a percentage increase in the rate of return to compensate for the risk of illiquidity. 75 How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return [email protected] © 2013 Munroe, Park & Johnson, Inc. Case Study 2 Income Approach – 5 Year Model DLOM 15% 20% 25% 30% Value After DLOM $200,000 $170,000 $160,000 $150,000 $140,000 ROR 17.9% 23.1% 25.1% 27.3% 29.7% % Increase 29.0% 40.3% 52.7% 66.4% 76 [email protected] © 2013 Munroe, Park & Johnson, Inc. How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return © 2013 Business Valuation Resources, LLC How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return Case Study 2 Discount for Lack of Marketability Noncontrolling, Marketable Value Less Discount for Lack of Marketability Noncontrolling, Nonmarketable Value 20% $200,000 ($40,000) $160,000 77 [email protected] © 2013 Munroe, Park & Johnson, Inc. How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return Calculation Using the Forecast of NCF Noncontrolling, Mktble Value 20% LOM Discount Value Return $200,000 17.9% $160,000 25.1% 78 [email protected] © 2013 Munroe, Park & Johnson, Inc. How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return © 2013 Business Valuation Resources, LLC How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return Points to Remember -Discount for Lack of Marketability- Fact: A DLOM can be supported using rate of return methodology. …the consensus conclusion that we draw is that illiquid investments trade at lower prices than liquid investments and generate higher returns… Aswath Damodaran NYU Stern School of Business 79 [email protected] © 2013 Munroe, Park & Johnson, Inc. How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return Points to Remember Conclusion Fact: Discounts occur in arm’s length transactions as a result of an investor’s requirement for an increased return. “. . . while discounts … are a means to an end, that end is the rate of return sought by an investor.” Comprehensive Guide for the Valuation of Family Limited Partnerships, 4th Ed., 146. 80 [email protected] © 2013 Munroe, Park & Johnson, Inc. How to Quantify and Support Your DLOM using Rates of Return © 2013 Business Valuation Resources, LLC
© Copyright 2024