Address by Rev. G. B. Molefe. Thursday, July 2, 1936. HOW TO CONSOLIDATE THE PRINCIPLES OF CHRISTIANITY AMONGST THE NATIVE PEOPLE, W ITH A VIEW TO RAISING THE TONE OF NATIVE SOCIETY. A t first when I was asked to speak at this gathering —the Natal Missionary Conference—I was tempted to decline. My reason, of course, was that the subject “ How to consolidate the Principles of Christianity am ongst the Native people with a view to raising the future tone of Native Society,” warranted a choice of men with more experience in the Mission field. Second thoughts, however, made me decide to accept because m y mind was on the young people with whom and among whom I live. Allow me for a moment to carry your thoughts back to 1835, when pioneer missionary enterprise set foot in Natal. These men came to grips with a race that had had its o^ra religion and customs. They found that the religion of the Natives was group religion. This was som ething alien to the Christian Religion, which is individualistic. Each person must decide for himself whether he accepts Christ or not. W hereas the family, clan, or even the tribe had to conform to the worship of an ancestral spirit, with no aim at all of convicting the individual soul as such to the belief of this spirit, these missionaries had to convert and convict the individual soul for Christ. This then was one of the tasks of the missionary, and we shall see later on what effect this has made on the Native people. The second thing that the W hite missionary found among the Native people was a system of laws and cus toms which cut across the grain of the missionaries who did not understand them. They had to break down this system altogether, and start afresh or to build from this configuration pattern a new system, discarding those customs that were essentially inconsistent with the spirit of Christ’s gospel. Most missionaries took the first course. Effect of Missionary Work.—Let me say at once that the work of the missionaries has been successful to a point. They have been successful, for example, in bringing individual souls to surrender themselves to Christ instead of leading the group as a group to Christ. Customs.—As regards blotting out Native customs, may say that nominally the missionary has w on; although actually he has been defeated, inasmuch as lipservice is engaged in by a large group of Natives. The customs, some of which are against Christian principles, are being indulged in by many of the Christian N atives’ I^or example, belief in witchcraft and the bone-thrower has not ceased. Native converts have not left polygamy The only difference is in the practice. There is much unhcenced polygamy. Man continues to have more than one wife, although the others are private wives. The missionary should have stamped this out gradually. That is why I feel that the battle for the Kingdom of Christ amongst the Natives requires the best and most prayerful messengers of God to struggle with this form of sin, otherwise a new sect of pharisees w ill'be firmly established. Church Discipline.—As the years have gone by, Church discipline has slackened considerably. The Native customs consisted of a system of taboos. Native society was obedient to the laws of the tribe because the individual who violated any of the customs was ostracised. The tone of Native society was thus high. Native people have the group mind greatly developed in them. _ This instinct should have been employed by missionaries of the various denominations in discipline. If an individual sinned in one denomination, the other denominations should not receive him until he has been forgiven by his former minister. There is no uniform action among the various denominations in stamping out sin. One church may discipline a Christian, but when he turns towards another denomination, his sin is over looked, and he is welcomed. There is no united front against sin. Separatist Churches.-— Separatist Churches have largely contributed towards the cause of the low Christian tone of Native society. Many disciplined Natives turn with impunity to these Separatist Churches and become leaders of the people. Superstition.—-After a hundred years’ work of preaching the Gospel of Christ, superstition is still as great as ever. Even Native leaders are not immune from this. In fact, the social progress of Native society has been retarded by this great monster — superstition. Superstition, the cousin of fear, has a marked demoralising influence on the spirit. It dampens hope, kills love and destroys faith. It must be admitted that these three virtues are the basis on which our Christian Faith is founded. Superstition has thus sapped the strength of the spirit of the Natives. To-day it m atters not how highly-educated a Native m ight be, mistress superstition has her sovereign shrine somewhere in him. This is no sweeping statement. Christian Principles: How Viewed. — Very few young people now adays— and even old people — are Christians because they have been convicted of sin. During my travel to the Native Institutions in the Union of South Africa, I rarely came across students who told me frankly that they became Christians because of cer tain religious experiences. A m ajority of the answers revealed that they became Christians just because their parents were Christians. In other words, Christianity has become a mark of civilisation and goes no further. A man who is a Christian gains the respect of his superiors. That is the general outlook of the average Christian. Europeans have partly contributed to the slackness in Christian principles. The following facts show th is: Sunday Keeping.—The early missionary taught and dem onstrated that Sunday was a day set apart for wor ship. To-day, the average Native sees his m aster going out for tennis or golf on a Sunday morning. The servant say s: “ These people brought C hristianity; they know far better than Native priests, therefore why should we worry about going to church. To a Native every Euro pean is a Christian, and the servant takes the cue from him. Every European, I say, is a force either for uplift ing- the Christian soul of the Native, or for turning it to waywardness. This is entirely due to a misconception that every European is a Christian. Apostasy is taking its grip among some Native servants in towns. Attitude of Missionaries.-—Another disturbing fea ture to the Christian Native to-day is the attitude of many missionaries towards their Native converts. I was astounded to read the other day of an unfortunate state ment in the Press. A European missionary wrote to the effect that during his 40 years’ service as missionary among natives, he has learnt that they could not be trusted, nor relied upon. It fell to the lot of the editor of the paper to refute this universal statement. W hat his native congregation thought of this fatalism remains to be seen. One thing seems clear to me, Christian Natives have become suspicious of the average mis sionary and this has discouraged the spirit of Christ in them. (a) Bible.—To consolidate the principles of Chris tianity amongst the Native people, I would suggest the following: (a) The Bible: W e should get our Native people to read more of the Bible. They should be Bibleminded. Every minister should insist that every Native convert should have a Bible at home. These Bibles should be read by families every day. An almanac, like the one issued by the Ebenezer Press, should be in every home. There should be Bible circles in the church. (b) Trained Evangelists.—W e need prayerful men who are trained in the Bible, to undertake a house-tohouse evangelism. Such men, only as are found prayer ful and of good report, should be employed. (c) Social Service.—W e need young men of good character and love for the gospel to be trained as social workers under the guidance of the church. All social activities should be under the church. The spiritual as well as the physical and moral spheres of the individual should be catered for by the church. The church is not bold enough now, to lead, to denounce vice openly in the pulpit and in the press. (d) Sympathetic Missionaries. — W e need sympa thetic missionaries who will not only preach the Gospel, but will also help their congregation by doing community service. They should be prayerful men with a moral courage to hit out against political injustice. The mis sionary who has shown himself a champion for the Natives is a dynamic force to his congregation. W e need the type of Dr. Phillips of old. Christianity is life. Jesus has said: “ I have come that they might have life, and that they m ight have it more abundantly.” Any unfair ness is minimising the power of the Spirit. The mis sionary, therefore, ought to be a man who has himself been saturated with the Spirit of Christ. Christ went among the people uplifting and doing good in the home, the street and in the temple. He fought against injustice. H e led thought on many social as well as religious prob lems. His followers came to love Him, and to be loyal to Him. “He was a mighty transm itter of power. Living in the Light, He was Himself the true Light of Life to the world of men.” To consolidate the principles of Christianity, the missionaries m ust get back to the way of Jesus, in order to recapture leadership in the world. I am the way,” §aid Jesus. W e as missionaries have to seek for the way of Christ and keep straight on. The real and effective Light that is passed through us will depend strictly according to the Light we are prepared to receive into our hearts and lives. If we as missionaries are open to the searching and purifying Light of God, then gracious, helpful and energising forces will pass through us to the Native converts. It is the people who walk in the Light, as He is in the Light, who will consoli date the principles of Christianity among the Natives. A missionary m ust be a conductor of grace and power to the congregation. He m ust preach what he has experienced. (e) Medical Doctors.—W e need missionary doctors in the Locations. That is the only remedy to kill super stition. These men m ust be true Christians themselves. In short, they m ust be evangelising doctors. (f) Education.—I have left education out as I feel that the Education Department is the best man to look after that. They are doing missionary work in that connection, thus giving the missionaries the opportunity to devote their whole time to the spiritual task. “ Dr. E. Gumede, M.B., C.H.B., read a paper, Thursday morning, July 2, 1936, on— NATIVE MEDICAL SERVICE OF THE FUTURE. There have been isolated heroes in the cause of Native health in South Africa. Conspicuous among them are missionaries and other doctors who have devoted their lives to the cause. Diseases which Natives had regarded in the past as fatal have been successfully treated by modern European medicine and surgery. The result was that Natives were rapidly gaining confidence and hospi tals were becoming overcrowded. Four outstanding examples of these hospitals were Dr. Schweitzer’s in the Congo, Dr. King’s in Uganda, and Dr. McCord’s and the Victoria Hospital in the Union. In addition there were several smaller institutions scat tered through the country. These institutions are now training male and female Native nurses, who are able to do valuable work in the locations. The Union He<h Departm ent is also training young Natives and sending them into Native areas where they can prevent and localise disease. Let there be an attem pt to make medical science part of the Native’s life. Let his mind be educated and converted rather than stress the magic powers of a bottle of medicine. Above all let there be no play on his ignorance and superstition for gain. Harmonious Work. D uring th e ja st epidemic some of us had the unique opportunity of treating patients in consultation with Native doctors. It was an opportunity for two diver gent and misguidedly antagonistic attitudes of treating disease, yet we worked quite harmoniously. W e established ourselves into local medical councils, and invariably saved our patients, preserved our selfrespect, and had a chance to sit down and talk in abstract without suspicion. The local inyangas, whose name is legion, began to trust and consult me about their patients. This diplo macy of winning their respect and favour ended in each supplying the other with medicine and advice for the benefits of the patients. In the minds of Africans the genuine old inyanga is passing away slowly, and for the lack of something scien tific his place is being taken by quacks and robbers. For the future let us be sure in our minds_that the workers the Government puts into the field are not in ferior, and let us be sure that their equipment is not half hearted and the policy not spasmodic. Excerpt of address by Dr. Brookes. Thursday evening, at W esley Church. A COMPARISON OF THE PRESENT SOCIAL AND POLITICAL CONDITION OF THE NATIVE W ITH THAT OF FIFTY YEARS AGO. The change can best be symbolised by the growth on the Rand. Johannesburg is a potent cause of change. It has done a great deal of harm and a great deal of good. Religion is not the only thing the Native has taken back from the mine compound. He has taken disease as well. Literacy among the Natives has increased ten or tw enty times in the last fifty years. In spite of miserable equipment, schools are better than they were fifty years ago. Natives are now reading the newspapers. W ithin the last fifty years local councils have been established. There are now 43 local councils, one of which is concerned with 2 ,000,000 people and spends £ 200,000 a year. But although the Native has advanced in some respects, he has gone back in others. Fifty years ago it was an unquestionable axiom in the Cape that the Native could qualify for citizenship. This has been destroyed and something put in its place which may be quite good, but it is not common citizen ship. W hat industry there was in 1885 was open to the Native, and even in 1903 the Native was encouraged in the towns to take his place in industry. Now industry after industry is being closed to the Native. To-day the Native is being over-regulated and over legislated for. In 1935 there were over 4,000,000 Native offences committed in the Union. The number of con victions for tax default was enormous. Ten years ago the number of convictions was nothing like last year’s total. The increase is unhealthy and undesirable. It is retrogression. The relations between the Natives and Police in South Africa have never been more unsatisfactory than to-day. I am not blaming anyone. It would be untrue to say that every Native is perfect. There are criminals among the Native people. It would be just as untrue to say the Natives have no friend among the police in the country. W hatever the cause, the position is most unsatisfactory. Address delivered by the Rev. John L. Dube. Central Methodist Church, on Thursday, July 2, 1936. You have just been listening to the speeches of European leaders of thought testifying in eloquent terms to the value of missionary work amongst the Bantu peo ple for close on a hundred years. To-night, I stand before you as the mouthpiece of that people to bear witness in term s no less sincere to the gratitude of struggling millions of my people for the uplift they are receiving through the missionaries from the dread hand of witch craft and all that it means to the vision of the spiritual ideal and through it to enjoy the benefits of health and education. No words of mine can adequately express the depth of that gratitude, but if I could send a message from my people to the spirits of those brave figures who have laboured on our behalf in the past, and have given their lives for us and our uplift, it would be this:— “ Tell them that their work has not been in vain; tell them we are not unresponsive; tell them we are fighting, struggling against our own weaknesses of ignorance and superstition, and that though our pro gress may be slow and at times we may suffer set backs, we shall win through, and that no power on earth can stop us from eventually taking our places in this continent for the common good of us all.” I do not think that we realise the difficulties under which the missionaries of the past laboured in their endeavour to promote the civilisation of the Bantu peo ple, and how, without any written language, records or literature to work upon except a rich oral tradition, they succeeded in making the impact they did upon the Bantu people until to-day we have a complete and com prehensive w ritten language sufficient to enable us to educate and send our sons to the colleges of Europe and America to compete on equal terms with the most dis tinguished intellects of those countries, and to emerge from the ordeal with credit to themselves and to the country of their birth. For this, we pay tribute to our missionaries who, with a singleness of purpose, have always realised that there can only be one solution of our problem and that is the common heritage of the Christian religion. Before the advent of the Christian missionary there was a general system of spirit-worship, and ancestorworship played a very im portant part in this religion. There were, of course, spirits other than those of ances tors, both bad and good. W itchcraft or sorcery consisted in using the influence of bad spirits, whether they were ancestral or non-ancestral, and magic consisted in using the influence of the good spirits. It was the power of these spirits to visit the living with pestilences, disease and death, which made it necessary to placate them and it was this belief, driven deep into the history of all Bantu people, that the missionary had to combat. It is to the credit of the missionary that this hindrance to the development of my people is fast crumbling away in the face of the wondrous influence of the Christian faith. To-day thousands upon thousands of the Bantu people have accepted the tenets of the Christian faith and are in turn spreading the Gospel of Christ over South Africa. But the preaching- of the Gospel was but one object of the missionary endeavour. It is true it was the main one, but on the other hand, the way had to be prepared for the acceptance of the Gospel, and here again the brunt of educating the people fell upon the Missionary, and how well he discharged his task is evidenced by the general average of intelligence of the Bantu people. To-day the Bantu people will be found "holding positions of responsibility and trust throughout our Sub-Continent with no other educational facilities open to them than those of the Mission School, and I venture to think that the reflective European opinion can find only one verdict and that is that the missionary has here again done his work well and faithfully. As for the Bantu, he has proved that he can w ith stand the shock of W estern civilisation. W hilst the Indian of America and the Australian aboriginee have died out before the tide of W estern civilisation, the Bantu people of South Africa have increased. He refuses to die or droop before civilisation. He has adapted him self to the changing times of the passing years, and has brought as his contribution a happiness in life and power to endure, and is revealing from day to day inner values in life little dream t of by earlier missionaries, upon which the modern missionary must build. It is upon those values we m ust build. Do not be tempted to tear down the old structure entirely and replace it with a new. Rather, build upon it; replace it, if you will, plank by plank, but retain the old and sure foundations and let there eventually emerge a new and more solid structure capable of standing up against the winds and tides of life. To you, then, who are carrying on the noble tradi tions of a great order, I say:— “ Be not dispirited, let your motto be to serve man as you have done in the past, irrespective of creed or colour. Your reward may not be apparent, but it is there in the lowly hearts of millions of my people for whom you stand as the bulwark against oppression and injustice and the beacon light of hope and civilisation.” Address delivered by Rev. M. J. Mpanza. Thursday, July 2, 1936. A REVIEW OF NATIVE MORAL PROGRESS FOR THE LAST FIFTY YEARS. The Executive Committee of the Natal Missionary Conference asked me to give an address o n : “ A Review of Native Moral Progress for the last SO years.” W hen considering my age and experience, I think the Execu tive Committee made a mistake by asking a simple young man of 45 years old for such a good address. Yet I did not wish to disappoint them, and therefore I have ven tured to tackle it, and hope you will excuse me for my mistakes and shortcomings. Before I embark on the little canoe of my address, I would like to express in brief my Bantu people’s grati tude and mine to the missionaries of all denominations for the great things they have done for my race in endeavouring to purify its primitive customs and to pre serve its moral standards by the religion of our Saviour Jesus Christ. W e are indeed highly indebted to the missionaries, as well as lady missionaries, to many Euro pean friends, and the Government, for their remarkable efforts to uplift our African people. Any success the Black man has is always traced back to his fatherly missionary and his sympathetic European friend. As for Native moral progress during the last fifty years, I should rather say its review is two-fold, namely, good aspect and bad aspect. Its good aspect is that by coming into contact with the missionaries and some good Europeans, the moral standard of the Bantu has been improved and strengthen ed. The good example set by these invaluable friends of the Bantu is bearing good fruits, and the character and conduct of the African are being educated and protected. All over the country we find good products among the Bantu who endeavour to lead useful lives and thus set examples to their own fellow men. On the other hand, the bad aspect of the Bantu moral standard is caused by the combination of two bad influences, viz., bad elements of the original heathens, and bad elements of the foreign nations. Some Natives by coming into contact with undesirable elements of overseas races—and after acquiring their indecent ways —resort to their original heathen vices, and become poisonous and destructive to their good moral standard as a race, and become worse than the time they were raw heathens. In this address, I have time only to deal with a few of the moral aspects in Bantu life. I have tried to relate how our people treated their moral concerns during their primitive stage before any white men came to our coun try. I have also tried to compare this with the modern ways which are employed by the Bantu to-day, after coming into contact with foreign nations. (1). Benevolence and Hospitality. To-day we find very good work which is being done by some sympathetic Europeans to help the poor and the needy. They organise different Benevolent Societies for children and adults and thus relieve them from misery. One may think that the Bantu had nothing of these Benevolent Societies before W hite people came to South Africa. They had them of course! Only their methods were not organised as Europeans’. It was in the Black m an’s heart to help the poor and especially during starvation time. Long, long before the missionary came, there was the custom of “ Ukutekelisana.” I have not got a proper English word for it. “ U kutekelisana” meant this: W hen there was starvation in the country, people who were starving used to appeal for help to those who had reaped enough. These good heathen people never refused nor asked for any money, but simply filled the “ Izinqalati ” (mat basket) of the hungry with mealies, mabele, amadata, umbhondwe, ubhatata, udonqa, etc. I would like to ask this question: How is it to-day am ong the heathen and Christian Bantu? I beg to leave this question with you to answer, Mr. President, Ladies and Gentlemen. Another good thing which was done by the Bantu during their primitive stage was the custom of “ Ukukwanya or “ Ukukotoza.” This, too, was a national practice backed up by the public opinion. “ Ukukwanya ” was done during the harvest time. The workers in the fields used purposely to leave some crops in order that the children of the district and the poor could come and pick up what was left, as did Ruth of the Bible. After this, different herds of cattle of the district were grazed on the reaped fields. The writer of this address once got 5 /- worth of the “ Ukukwanya ” mealies when he was 10 years old. May I ask the same question again: How is it to-day? The answer is: Some heathen and Christian children don’t know the meaning of the word “ Uku kwanya.” The B^ntu do not leave anything in the fields for the poor any more, and anyone who would try to go and pick up something in the reaped fields, or send his cattle there, could be charged for theft and trespassing. As for Hospitality. Our forefathers were full of hospitable qualities. If shipwrecked sailors during the fifteenth century could rise up and speak, they could testify to this fact. They were treated hospitably by the Bantu who lived at the coast of Natal and the Cape. They gave them food, fresh water, and night shelter, and carried their goods to their destination. And in the later centuries, we read from books that when early European settlers came to Natal, they were treated kindly by the Bantu. Our great Zulu King Tshaka gave them a piece of land on the coast including the place where the famous City of Durban stands to-day. Not only that, but we are told by some of the early settlers and missionaries that at some of the Bantu heathen homes they were received kindly and were given “ amasi,” “ utshw ala” and other varieties of the Bantu food, and were given fine mats to sleep on. Our forefathers did not do this to the Europeans only, but it was a national custom to treat the travellers of the King kindly, and to give them food and nisjhtshelter free of charge. „ To-day you find the extreme opposite of this. j • -e chanSed considerably. Most of the heathen and Christian Bantu do not seem to possess that hospi tality any more. I attribute this to poverty and scarcity of good harvests, and also to the fact that the Bantu have copied the W estern ways of treating travellers. Each traveller is expected to pay for night shelter and food at the hotels. W e find it a very heavy burden to-day to practise this primitive hospitality because we are tempted to adapt ourselves to the modern ways which we see being done by civilised races. And at the same time it is very hard to get our travellers adapted to the new ways. They still expect to have everything for nothing, as it was done before the Europeans came to this country. 2. Punctuality. . . . T “ do anything in time is a very important thing with the W estern Nations. It is a ve^y difficult affair with the Bantu to keep time. W e are often blamed for' this. Of course, educated Bantu do their best to keep to time, just as Europeans do, but in several cases we Jt veiT hard, in so far as this: that some say if one wants to convene a Bantu meeting to start at 9 a m he should deceive them and say the meeting will start at o a.m., so that they be on time. One may wonder and say, why is it hard for the Bantu to be in time? I will try to explain. The Bantu kept time in their own way, not as Europeans do. The Bantu reckoned time not by hours or minutes, because they owned no watches. They only counted bv davs weeks, months and years, and their watch was the sun. u u Stlli ’ , 1 am Very P,eased t0 mention that this good habit of keeping time is gaining ground with most of our people. They have learned to apologise just as the European does when he comes a few minutes after the appointed time. 3. Temperance. Europeans have Temperance Associations which are intended to protect human beings from the dangers of alcohol, which destroy many good families. Temperance Societies have saved many people from destruction. I am very delighted to say that the Bantu too, in their primitive stage, had their own ways of protecting their folk from the dangers of excessive drinking. Glut tonous people were ridiculed and despised by the com munity. As for beer drinks, no young man was allowed to drink with “ Amakehla ” (married men), neither chil dren nor women were allowed. Habitual drunkards were denounced and nicknamed “ Izabhukazana ” (worthless people). The young were not permitted to drink to an excess; this was abominable. W hen we compare the past time and the present, we find that things have gone worse, as most of y<5u know. Now, Natives don’t drink their beer only, but they drink European liquor and many kinds of poisonous alcoholic drinks which are manufactured by them, such as “ Isishimeyana,” “ Isiqata,” “ Kill-me-quick,” “ Sqedaviki,” “ Igwebu,” “ Sgwagwagwa,” etc. These deadly Bantu drinks were not known fifty years ago. Many young men and women come to towns and ruin their health with these poisonous drinks. I very much regret to mention that the Municipal Beer Halls in towns help to spread drunkenness amongst the Bantu. Many young Bantu who have never tasted beer before learn to drink at these Municipal Beer Halls, and from there they crave for stronger drinks, and thus join illicit liquor traffic, the result of which is exploitation of the poor unfortunate Bantu financially. They spend tremendous big sums of money in purchasing these illicit drinks, and in paying excessive fines at the Law Courts when they are arrested at these illicit liquor places. Something m ust be done to protect the Bantu from this evil. 4. Truthfulness and Honesty. These were characteristics of most of the Bantu people. The liars and dishonest were severely punished by the King. Nowadays some Bantu are drifting away from truthfulness and honesty. There is a Zulu saying which is common to-day amongst the Bantu. “ Pika Mpezeni kuyapikwa ! ” (Deny Mpezeni, it is a custom to deny!). This was said by a Chief at Court advising his son who had a case before the M agistrate. May our people continue to seek for the T ruth as they learnedjt from the missionaries and that they be honest in their deals. (5). Sympathy. It was the custom of the Bantu to share each other’s troubles. W hen a person died in a certain locality, it was a national custom for all the members of that district to condole the bereaved family. A person who did not come to express his sympathy to the bereaved was looked upon as a wizard who had caused the death of the deceased. This sympathetic attitude of the Bantu was promi nent evfen when Europeans came to live among them. They heartily mourned for a deceased member of their European’s m aster’s family. You all know how the body of the famous Dr. Livingstone was treated by his servants. Even when they happen to work for cruel European masters, the Bantu seldom retaliate. Even when he is tortured the African rarely loses his temper. Take the case of the negroes in America, for instance. W hile they were slaves they did not hate their masters. W hen their m asters died, they composed a mourning song for him, as this one: “ All the darkies am a’weeping, Massa in de cold, cold ground; Down in the cornfields hear their mournful sound.” Even during the W ar of the Emancipation of Slaves in America, when men in the South went to war, negroes were left to look after the families of those who fought against their emancipation. I am delighted to say that even to-day my people have not drifted away from this aspect, with the excep tion of a very small minority. 6. Chastity. Anyone who transgressed the law of chastity among the Bantu was severely dealt with. In the case of a married woman, the punishment was death to both parties. There were different methods of preserving the chastity of the Bantu for all sections of the communitv. Virgins of the district had their own Council, which was led by the “ Amaqikiza ” (older section). No “ Amatshitsho ” (younger section) were allowed to choose lovers without the permission of the Amaqikiza. Any virgin who had offended the virgins of the district by being careless with her character was badly handled by the “ Amaqikiza.” In the case of minor cases she was denounced and scolded, and in serious cases she was thrashed and rubbed with sand till some parts of her body bled. A young man of the race who had offended the virgins was also punished by them as according to the nature of his offence. In serious cases the young man was forced to pay a fine of one cow, which was killed at once and its meat eaten by aged women. Virgins did not attend the wedding of a virgin who had got an illegitimate child, and they did not eat the m eat of her wedding feast. Virgins were, periodically examined by the married women of the district in order to find out whether their virginity was still perfect or not. All these customs helped to preserve the moral pres tige of the Bantu people as a race. May the missionaries of all denominations and all who are concerned in the Bantu progress, scrutinise the Native customs and those which are not contrary to the Bible be not interfered with. There are some very good customs among the Bantu which, after they had become Christians, were wrongfully thrown away. It grieves my heart to mention definitely that chastity of the Bantu to-day is not as it used to be. I wish not to be misunderstood in my above remarks about Bantu morals. I do not mean to say that the Bantu were righteous, and that the coming of the missionaries with the Gospel was unnecessary. Not at a ll! I would never for a moment nurse that in my mind. As I have men tioned earlier in my address, the missionaries have done great things for the African peoples spiritually and materially. In conclusion, Mr. President, Ladies and Gentlemen, I am happy to be able to say that in spite of all these agencies that tend to lower the morals of the Bantu, we shall not fear. “ God is our Refuge and Strength, a very present help in time of trouble. Therefore will we never, never fear.” The religion of Jesus Christ, preached by earnest Christian servants of Our Lord, will in its powerful force bring all these enemies and many more down at our feet. “ Glory be to God on high! ” CONSTITUTION OF THE NATAL MISSIONARY CONFERENCE. I.—Objects. 1. To further Christian Missions in Natal and other parts of South-East Africa. 2. To encourage fraternal intercourse and co operation amongst Ministers, Missionaries and others interested in Mission work belonging to the various denominations. 3. To disseminate information among the public generally with a view to arousing a sympathetic under standing of missionary operations. 4. To further the education and general advance m ent of the Bantu. 5. To collect Missionary statistics. 6 . To obtain papers on subjects relating to Mis sionary work. 7. To consider all questions that may bear, through legislation or otherwise, upon the religious, economic, social and educational interests of the Bantu. 8. To examine into the methods of Missionary work with the object of securing, as far as practicable, uni formity of action in dealing with Native customs, needs and development. 9. To co-operate with Joint Councils, Missionary Conferences, and other bodies working for Native benefit. II.—Membership. 1. (a) The Conference shall consist of Ministers, Missionaries and others connected with any Christian communion or society. (b) New members shall ordinarily be admitted by vote of the m ajority of the Conference on nomination by a member or members present. (c) Otherwise applications for membership may be made to the Executive through the Secretary, the Execu tive to have the power to admit such to membership. 2. All members shall be entitled to speak and vote at any meeting of the Conference. 3. (a) An annual subscription, payable in advance, shall be paid by each member, as follows: Europeans 5/-, Bantu members 2/-. (b) Any member failing to pay the subscriptions for two consecutive Conferences shall be deemed to have forfeited the right of membership. 4. Corresponding members may be admitted by the vote of the Conference in the usual way, or by Executive action. III.—Meetings. 1. An annual meeting shall be held at the time and place appointed by the Executive. 2. During its session Conference shall be opened each day with the reading of scripture and prayer, devo tional exercises, and each adjournm ent shall be accom panied with prayer. 3. The meetings of the Conference shall be presided over by the President, or, in his absence, by a VicePresident. 4. The order of proceedings shall be arranged by the Executive. 5. Subjects for discussion shall not be introduced without notice, except by permission of the Conference. 6. Sittings shall be held with open doors unless the Conference, in any special case, decide otherwise. 7. A report of the proceedings shall be prepared by the Secretary, and printed, if funds permit. 8. A Balance Sheet shall be prepared and printed with the Report of Proceedings. IV.—Officers. 1. The officers shall consist of a President, a European Vice-President, a Bantu Vice-President, a'nd a Secretary-Treasurer, chosen at each Conference for the ensuing Conference, and to take office at the close of the Conference at which they are elected. 2 . The Executive shall consist of the four officers, together with the retiring President and Vice-Presidents, and one lady member. 3. A Nominating Committee of five shall be chosen early in each Conference to present nominations, two names to be presented for each of the four vacancies. (b) Other nominations may be made by members. (c) Voting shall be by ballot. 4. In the event of the President and Vice-Presidents being absent, Conference shall elect a new President at the beginning of the Conference. 5. Four shall constitute a quorum for meeting of the Executive. HONORARY ROLL. Miss Grace Hitchcock, U.S.A. Miss Mary Hitchcock, U.S.A. Dr. Geo. Gale, Fort Hare, Alice, Cape Province. Rev. J. D. Taylor, D.D., 19 Eleanor Street, Fairview, Johannesburg. EMERITUS ROLL. Rev. S. and Mrs. Aitchison, Harding. Rev. N. Braatvedt, Durban. Rev. John Bruce, M.A., Scotland. Rev. H. Cotton, 32 Lancaster Road, Durban. Mrs. S. Ransom, U.S.A. Rev. David RusselL Miss L. Graham, Bulwer. Rev. L. O. Feyling, Durban North. Rev. J. Metcalf, Caister Crescent, Durban. ' ACTIVE ROLL. Abraham, Rev. R. L., Groutville. A4kleby, Rev. J., Emtulwa M.S., Mt. Elias P.O. Adnesgaard, Rev., Qudeni. Astrup, The Rt. Rev. Bishop Johs., D.D., Kranskop. Ballentine, Rev. T. R., 342 Musgrave Road, Durban. Barker, Miss Marion, Pisgah M.S., Harding-. Bates, W. G., 86 Beatrice Street, Durban. Botterell, Miss Inez, Dumisa. Brittenden, Miss R. L., Inanda Seminary, Phoenix. Brookes, Dr. Edgar H., Adams M.S. Brueckner, Dr. K. R., Adams M.S. Caluza, Rev. F. M., 47 Sidney Road, Durban. Carter, Miss Minnie E., Inanda Seminary, Phoenix. Cawston, Dr. F. G., 14 Britannia Buildings, Durban. Christoferson, Rev. A. F., Esperanza. Clarke, Miss E. F., 43 North Ridge Road, Durban. Cragg, Rev. A. W. and Mrs., 91 Ridge Road. Scottsville, Pieterm aritzburg. Dahle, Rev. S., Umpumulo M.S., Mapumulo. Dear, Miss I. S., Pisgah M.S., Harding. Dent, S. R., P.O. Box 395, Maritzburg. Dewar, Rev. James, 188 Loop Street, Maritzburg. Dower, Rev. M artin J., 88 Gordon Road, Durban. Dube, Mr. Charles, Inyoni, Zululand. Dube, Rev. J. L., Ph.D. Ohlange, Phoenix. Falck, Rev. S. M., P.O. Box 88, Dundee. Farup, Rev. J. (on furlough, U.S.A.). Ferguson, Mr. A. N., Mansfield M.S., Izkigolweni. Fridolv, Rev. C., P.O. Box 37, Komatipoort, Transvaal. Frost, Miss C. E., Adams M.S. Follosoe, Rev. N. M., Mtunzini P.O., Zululand. Gibbs, Rev. E. S., Izingolweni. Gilje, Miss B., Umpumulo Inst., P.O. Mapumulo. Goddard, Rev. Frank, Ikwezi M.S., Harding. - Gronli.'-'R^v J, -F^-(x>n- fiirloHffh, TJ.StA t^. Gumede, Rev. Posselt, Inanda P.O., via Phoenix. Gumede, Dr. Inis, Inanda P.O., via' Phoenix. Gumede, Rev. Enos B., 26 Somtseu Road, Durban. Haldorsen, Rev. M. C., Empangeni. Halland Mrs., A. W., Izotsha. Hallendorf, Rev. K., Rorkesdrift. Harris, Mrs. E. A. M., Dumisa P.O. Hartm an, Miss A., Item ba M.S., Enqabeni. Hawkins, Rev. John and Mrs., Lansdowne M.S., M atubatuba. Hervey, Rev. P. J. and Mrs., 26 Somtseu Road, Durban. Johanson, Rev. K. J., 129 Hartley Rd., Overport, Durban. Jonsson, Miss S., Box 88, Dundee. Kempe, Dean A. R. Box 88, Dundee. Kjelvei, Rev. John, Eotimati M.S., P.O. Mapumulo. Keyes, Mrs. A. K., 95 W indermere Road, Durban. Kriel, Miss M. M., Y.W.C.A., Esplanade, Durban. Krook, Miss H., Umpumulo M.S., Mapumulo. Larsen, Miss E., Kwa Mondi, Eshowe, Zululand. Leisegang, Rev. T. M., Mahlabatini, Zululand. Lowe, Sister M., Concord, 95 W indermere Road, Durban. Luthuli, Chief Albert, Groutville. Mahon, Mr. A., Draycott Rail. Magnussen, Rev. E., H artley Road, Durban. Makhanya, H. M. S. & Mrs., Imbumbulu M.S., Amanzimtoti. Makhanya, Miss Sibusisiwe Violet, Imbumbulu M.S., Amanzimtoti. Malcolm, Mr. D. McK., Box 395, Maritzburg. Matibela, Mr. A. F., 48 Cathedral Road, Durban. Matthews, Mr. Z. K., Fort Hare, Alice, C.P. Mavaneni, Rev. J., Appelsbosch, via Dalton. McCord, Dr. J. B. (on furlough, U.S.A.). Molefe, Rev. Geo. B., Methodist Native Church, New castle. Mpanza, Rev. M. J., Box 1570, Durban. Mtimkulu, Rev. am LM r 3==A., 79 North Street, Durban. Myklebust, Rev. and Mrs. O. G., Umpumulo Inst., P.O. Mapumulo. Ndawonde, Rev. W., P.O. Inanda, via Phoenix. Nduli, Rev. N. M., 86 Beatrice Street, Durban. Ngcobo, Rev. R. M., P.O. Umtwalumi. Ngcobo, Mr. Selby, Adams M.S. Nhlapo, Rev. S., St. Faith’s Mission, Durban. Nicholls, Rev. A., Edendale, via Maritzburg. Nyembezi, Rev. I. M., Indaleni M.S., Richmond. Odendaal, Rev. M. W., Dundee. O ’Hanlon, Miss K., c/o Mrs. W . L. Neithardt, Clairwood. Palm, Sister M artha, Mahlabatini, Zululand. Pamla, Rev. N., Driefontein. Phipson, Mr. C. A. and Mrs., 17 Phipson Rd., Scottsville, Maritzburg. Reuling, Mr. John and Mrs., Adams M.S. Rodseth, Rev. P. A., Kwa Mondi, via Eshowe. Sandburg, Nurse A., P.O. Ceza, Zululand. Sandstrom, Rev. J. furlougfo7~8 weden). Scoggings, Rev. F., The Deanery, Loop Street, Pieter maritzburg. Scroombie, Rev. G. A., Mehlomnyama. Sibiya, Rev. J. M., Dundee. Sililo, Rev. M., New Scotland, M aritzburg. Sililo, Rev. T., Adams M.S. Sivetye, Rev. G. M., Imfumi M.S., via Umkomaas. Skarin, Miss A., P.O. Ceza, Zululand. Skavang, Miss M., Eshowe, Zululand. Steele, Rev. E. H., St. Faiths, Carlisle Street, Durban. Stick, Rev. H. A. and Mrs., Adams M.S. Suter, Rev. F„ Dumisa. Taylor, Dr. A. B., 29 McCord Road, Overport, Durban. Titlestad, Rev. L. M., 150 Bellevue Road, Durban. W albridge, Miss M. E., Inanda Seminary, Phoenix. W ebb, Mr. Maurice, 123 Manning Road, Durban. W hiteman, Mr. H. W., 41a Prince Street, Durban. Zululand, The Rt. Rev. Bishop W m., Vryheid. Collection Number: AD1715 SOUTH AFRICAN INSTITUTE OF RACE RELATIONS (SAIRR), 1892-1974 PUBLISHER: Collection Funder:- Atlantic Philanthropies Foundation Publisher:- Historical Papers Research Archive Location:- Johannesburg ©2013 LEGAL NOTICES: Copyright Notice: All materials on the Historical Papers website are protected by South African copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed, or otherwise published in any format, without the prior written permission of the copyright owner. Disclaimer and Terms of Use: Provided that you maintain all copyright and other notices contained therein, you may download material (one machine readable copy and one print copy per page) for your personal and/or educational non-commercial use only. People using these records relating to the archives of Historical Papers, The Library, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, are reminded that such records sometimes contain material which is uncorroborated, inaccurate, distorted or untrue. While these digital records are true facsimiles of paper documents and the information contained herein is obtained from sources believed to be accurate and reliable, Historical Papers, University of the Witwatersrand has not independently verified their content. Consequently, the University is not responsible for any errors or omissions and excludes any and all liability for any errors in or omissions from the information on the website or any related information on third party websites accessible from this website. This document forms part of the archive of the South African Institute of Race Relations (SAIRR), held at the Historical Papers Research Archive at The University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
© Copyright 2024