R e l at i o n s h i p b e t w e e n I n - h o u s e a n d O u t s i d e C o u n s e l How to Get and Keep Our Work Pet Peeves and Fave Raves of Corporate Counsel By Chrys A. Martin Every attorney wants to know the secrets to getting work from a major corporation, keeping the client happy, and building positive working relationships. Retaining a client is based upon building relationships and committing to responsiveness and efficiency. Marketing surveys also consistently show that business clients assume that most attorneys have a significant level of substantive law competence. Therefore, the top concerns of clients are responsiveness, industry knowledge, and efficiency. How can attorneys insure that they are responsive, have industry knowledge, and are efficient? As an attorney who has the wonderful opportunity to work with a number of major corporations in a comprehensive manner on employment law and employee benefits issues, I’ve learned what clients want. I con- clude that many attorneys see themselves as merely providing legal services to the client rather than partnering with them to help them meet their strategic objectives. If, in the role of outside counsel, an attorney simply works on the piece of litigation on his or her desk, without understanding and appreciating how it fits into a business’ overall strategic objectives, he or she may provide great legal work but still not meet the client’s business objectives. For example, although it may be more financially viable to quickly settle a case, a company may be worried about copycat cases and may not want to set a precedent for settlement. Conversely, perhaps company executives who would be embroiled as witnesses in litigation are in the midst of an expansion plan or another important corporate objective and simply cannot be diverted by a lawsuit, no matter how frivolous the lawsuit may be. Thus, the corporate Chrys A. Martin is an attorney based in the Portland, Oregon, office of Bullivant Houser Bailey, PC, which also has offices in Seattle, Vancouver, Sacramento, San Francisco and Las Vegas. Ms. Martin’s practice focuses on employment law and employee benefits from the management perspective. Ms. Martin was named by Chambers USA as one of America’s leading business lawyers in employment for 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008 and selected for inclusion in Best Lawyers in America 2007 and 2008, under Labor and Employment Law. She was named a Super Lawyer in 2006, 2007 and 2008 and one of Oregon’s top women lawyers. n 56 In-House Defense Quarterly Summer 2008 n n objective may be that this lawsuit regardless of merit simply has to be settled. This article, which analyzes a number of interviews, reports, publications and surveys, sets forth several of the factors that are routinely cited by corporate counsel as their “pet peeves” or their “fave raves” when discussing the services provided by their outside counsel. In-house attorneys may find that sharing the themes within this article with their outside counsel will help to articulate some issues that sometimes go unaddressed, and/or others that are simply in need of refreshing. If the outside counsel doesn’t know your underlying corporate objectives, they will not be able to meet them successfully. Cost Matters n Consider the inside view. Robert Burns, Of Counsel at Brouse McDowell in Akron, Ohio, writes that “the biggest and longest running disconnect between in-house and outside counsel” is that law firms focus on experience and relationship building, while clients focus on costs and value-added services. Robert Burns, An Ongoing Saga: The Still Imperfect Relationship Between InHouse and Outside Counsel, Of Counsel, Vol. 24, No. 10, Oct. 2005., http://patricklamb. typepad.com/perfectservice/files/burnsarticle1.pdf. See also Steven A. Lauer, What Do Law Firms Sell? What Do Clients Buy?, Law Practice Today, ABA Law Practice Management Section, Jan. 2004, http://www.abanet.org/lpm/lpt/ articles/fin01042.html. William B. Solomon, Jr., General Counsel of GMAC, has said, “When I talk to law firms, I have one hand on my wallet.” See Mary Swanton, “Making the Grade, 18th Annual Survey of General Counsel, Inside Counsel, July 2007. One article even suggests giving corporate counsel a stake in cost control by tying bonuses to the cost control measures inside attorneys are able to work out and utilize in regard to outside counsel costs. See Rees W. Morrison, Cost Control Patrol, Legal Times, Vol. XXVII, No. 19, May 17, 2004. At its base, however, it may simply be a matter of reinforcing the importance of outside counsel’s awareness of their clients’ budgets—and the value they place on any particular matter. See Thomas L. Sager and Steven A. Lauer, The Billable Hour: Putting a Wedge between Client and Counsel, Law Practice Today, ABA Law Practice Man- multi-year work and annual fee increases. work for their clients. The focus should not simply be on billing for today, but a method should be found that will work for a longterm relationship with clients. Stephen Falanga and Thomas Sparno, Building Successful Relationships between In-House and Outside Counsel, Metropolitan Corporate Counsel, at 46, May 2006 (Interview), http://www.metrocorpcounsel.com/current. n php?artType=view&artMonth=May&artYear=2006& EntryNo=4938. Firms are not adequately re- agement Section, Dec. 2003. Outside attorneys should cooperate and communicate with their clients on what service will cost and why. The client should be continuously updated on the cost. At the same time, the cost should be kept practical given the business objectives of the client. n Consider the impact of the Big Case, Law firms focus on experience and relationship building, while clients focus on costs and value-added services. n “Every year—even during recessions—law firms raise rates, despite the fact that they are billing fewer hours,” writes Petra Pasternak. See GCs Vent Their Frustrations about Outside Counsel, The Recorder, May 23, 2006, http://www.law.com/jsp/ihc/PubArticleIHC. jsp?id=1148301328212. “[D]uring down years they [law firms] shouldn’t pile up expenses,” a Silicon Valley general counsel who requested anonymity has said. Id. See also Thomas L. Sager and Steven A. Lauer, The Billable Hour. The impact of fee increases are especially important to keep in mind when litigated cases extend past one year and into another, where the client is forced to pay more rather than risk losing counsel who is familiar with the litigation. n Be conscientious: consider hidden costs to clients in case budgets and estimates. “I hold my thumb on my outside firms. It’s very labor intensive on my side to prevent a runaway budget.” Mary Swanton, Making the Grade (quoting Paul Risner, General Counsel, Boca Raton Community Hospital). n Make costs easy to decipher. Corporate counsel and clients want billing entries they can understand. When they read their bills, they should know what work was done and why. Outside counsel should articulate the value they are delivering to the overall case strategy, not merely the legal task they are performing. n Be flexible. Outside attorneys should be able to come up with billing solutions that sponding to client concerns about cost. In-house attorneys are finding alternative solutions. Many are less than ideal, for obvious reasons: “[T]hey’ve even sent work to cheaper lawyers in the Third World.” Catherine Aman, Cracking the Whip, Corporate Counsel , Feb. 27, 2003, http://www.law.com/jsp/law/LawArticleFriendly. jsp?id=1046288234900. (discussing alterna- tive fee arrangements used by law firms and their corporate clients). Christian Na, General Counsel, Mitel Networks has said, “I always ask if we can have arrangements other than the hourly fee, but law firms shy away and offer reasons why it won’t work,” Mary Swanton, Making the Grade (quoting Christian Na, General Counsel, Mitel Networks). However, many clients are leery of flat fees, so the flat fee concept must be explained in detail. How to Get on the Radar Screen: Getting Hired n No name dropping; do your research instead. The client and the client’s inside attorneys decide whether outside counsel is technically proficient early on, perhaps even before they are invited to make a pitch. What impresses inside counsel most is the attorney who has researched their business and knows what’s currently going on in their industry. Outside counsel should make their pitch all about the company, not all about them. A service approach, focused on the client’s needs, works well far beyond the point at which the outside attorney tries to get hired. It will help outside counsel clients: “We know that most law firms get fired because they don’t provide good enough service, not because the lawyer isn’t smart.” Dick Dahl, Corporate Clients Dissatisfied with Outside Counsel, Lawyers Weekly USA, April 15, 2006, available at http://findarticles.com/p/articles/ mi_qn4181/is_20060415/ai_n16166188/pg_1 In-House Defense Quarterly Summer 2008 57 n n R e l at i o n s h i p b e t w e e n I n - h o u s e a n d O u t s i d e C o u n s e l (quoting Beth Cuzzone, Director of Business Development, Goulston & Storrs). n What do clients look for in outside counsel? In one survey, in-house counsel ranked the following criteria as the top eight things they look for in selecting outside counsel: 1. Quality of work/responsiveness (tie) 2. Creative solutions 3. Billing rates 4. Provides preventive counseling 5. Multiple practice areas 6. Offers alternative fee arrangements 7. Has a diversity program 8. Has national reach Mary Swanton, Making the Grade. Other surveys rate responsiveness and creativity even higher, with substantive expertise down a notch or two, as is expected. Keeping Clients: Offer ValueAdded Services n Be personable. Outside counsel should get to know clients individually. Clients should be introduced to counsel’s staff, too. Robert Burns asks corporations and outside counsel to assess: “How well can you rate each of them on the following: Overall personality? Integrity? Actual versus selfperceived industry and business IQ? Business/industry and company experience?… Risk tolerance? Communication expectations? Timing expectations? Budget expectations?” Robert Burns, An Ongoing Saga. n Be respectful. Outside counsel should respect a client’s staff and recognize their efforts. If an attorney is rude to the general counsel’s secretary, he or she won’t last long. n Use a team approach. The team members who work with the client should remain consistent, when possible, and a firm-wide team approach should be utilized so that if the partner is tied up, a client can still find someone who knows them to communicate with. Good attorneys don’t duplicate work by having multiple associates on the same file, absent very unusual circumstances. See Falanga and Sparno, supra. n Know the client. “We want to create an environment in which outside counsel knows as much about our business as we do…. We want it so our business people don’t know the difference between inhouse and outside counsel. That is starting to happen.” Robert Vosper, Better Clients, Inside Counsel, Sept. 2006, http://www.in- as their attorney, but as their trusted busisidecounsel.com/section/trends/630 (quote from James Donchess, Assistant General Counsel of Parker Hannifin). Non-billable hours should be spent getting to know the business. Dick Dahl suggests using questionnaires that ask about the service received, having a client team that understands the business, and meeting with clients “off the n Clients want law firms that can keep up with and adapt to their changing industry and needs. n meter” to learn about the business and the problems the client is facing. Dick Dahl, Corporate Clients Dissatisfied with Outside Counsel, Daily Record and the Kansas City Daily News-Press, Apr 15, 2006. n Be proactive. “Law firms do just what we tell them to do. No more and no less.” Dick Dahl, Corporate Clients Dissatisfied with Outside Counsel (quoting Michael Rynowecer, President of BTI Consulting Group (who put out a 2005 survey of corporate counsel)). This is not what most clients want. “[U]pdate clients regularly on changes in the law and other matters that might affect their business.” Id. Outside counsel can offer CLEs and legal alerts as part of their service. Id. They should also recognize and be able to adapt to the client’s changing needs. “Companies’ needs and priorities change ‘every 18 months, almost like clockwork.’” See Sandra Prufer, In-House Counsel Axing Law Firms, ABA Journal Rep. 2 (Sept. 8, 2006) (quoting Michael Rynowecer, President, BTI Consulting Group). Clients want law firms that can keep up with and adapt to their changing industry and needs. Id. Providing “value-added” service will help assure outside attorneys that the clients will appreciate and remember them. n Be resourceful. If outside counsel can connect their clients with other service providers to improve business performance, the client will begin to see counsel not just 58 In-House Defense Quarterly Summer 2008 n n ness advisor. Communication—What Works and What Doesn’t n Initiate. Immediately, on receiving a matter, initiate a preliminary discussion about the matter and the company’s strategic direction. Later meetings of more substance may be required, but don’t ignore that first connection. This lets the client know the matter is as important to their attorney as it is to them. n Make sure you understand the scope of work being asked of you. Don’t surprise the client with a bill for work not asked for. n Give a client “just the solution, please.” “Clients constantly complain to me that outside lawyers continue to supply Rolls Royces when Volkswagens would do.” Joel F. Henning, Law Firms and Legal Departments: Can’t We All Get Along?, Business Law Today, ABA Section of Business Law, July/August 1998, http://www.abanet.org/ buslaw/blt/7-6firms.html. Inside counsel aren’t as interested in the problem as they are in the solution. See An Interview with David W. Rutstein. Clients want a result and want to pay for a result. See Steven A. Lauer, What Do Law Firms Sell? What Do Clients Buy? Perhaps the result is representation in a lawsuit or the legal work required for a business transaction. Id. However, the result is what the client wants to pay for, not the consultation and time. Id. n Ask for feedback. Outside counsel should ask the client what they like or don’t like—how they think he or she is doing. Dick Dahl, Corporate Clients Dissatisfied with Outside Counsel. Problems should be discussed with clients as soon as they arise. The client should be given an opportunity to let counsel know if there is a problem. n Take the client seriously. Outside counsel should not treat the client as if they don’t know what they’re talking about or in a way that gives the impression that he or she only has time for big problems. If it’s a problem for the client, it should be on counsel’s radar and they should care. n Be prompt in communication. E-mails and calls should be returned within two hours—24 hours at the latest. If this is impossible, outside counsel’s secretary or paralegal should get back to the client to determine what assistance is needed. “Sometimes, showing that you provide Become a Strategic Partner better-than-excellent service is all you n Learn about the client’s goals. “GCs put need to establish a unique position—for confidence in an outside counsel that quesexample, calls consistently returned within tions why a company is litigating a partictwo hours.” Edward Poll, Are You Unique ular matter.” Petra Pasternak, GCs Vent Enough to Deserve a Raise?, Law Prac- Their Frustrations About Outside Countice Today, ABA Law Practice Manage- sel. As one general counsel explained, “‘My ment Section, Jan. 2007, http://www.abanet. life would be a lot easier if the law firms org/lpm/lpt/articles/mtt01071.shtml. Alterna- asked: What are your priorities? How do tively, “[n]othing is more dangerous than a you want to handle this? Where should the client who’s left to assume a lawyer is play- resources go?’” Id. (quoting Golden West ing golf or, worse, napping on their dime.” Financial Corporation General Counsel Petra Pasternak, GCs Vent Their Frustra- Michael Roster). Unfortunately, a lot of law tions About Outside Counsel. Keep in mind, firms become too focused on fees and lose “E-mails get returned in [the corporate] sight of their client’s litigation goals. Rosenvironment in 20 minutes.” Id. (quoting ter continued, “[i]nstead of prioritizing a Mark Stevens, Fenwick & West). client’s objectives… [m]any firms are too n Help with PR. Outside attorneys should focused on their own billable-hour requirebe prepared and have excellent communi- ments.” Id. n Make it easy for your client to follow cation protocols in place before any disaster is imminent. Id. The client should not be the litigation process. “Avoid sending an made to scramble. There should be cooper- e-mail with a huge attachment and asking ation with corporate counsel, and an effort a general counsel to review it.” Id. A general counsel appreciates receiving succinct made to make them look good. Id. 3UCCESSFULCOPYPDF0- summaries of voluminous documents. As one general counsel stated, “I would really like a user’s guide to a long document.” Id. (quoting Claria Corporation General Counsel Richard Gray). A good “user’s guide” will highlight the areas that require “important strategic decisions.” Id. n Be realistic with your client about timelines. “Candid disclosure counts.” Id. According to one general counsel, “I’d much rather have outside counsel tell me a date they’re confident about than curry favor with me by making unrealistic promises.” Id. (quoting Claria Corporation General Counsel Richard Gray). Don’t over promise and under deliver. n Be honest. Outside counsel should admit errors if they happened—blame shouldn’t be passed on to team members. Personal responsibility should be taken. Outside counsel’s expertise, and that of his or her firm, should not be oversold. If the expertise isn’t there, that should be clearly stated. # - 9 #- -9 #9 #-9 + In-House Defense Quarterly Summer 2008 59 n n
© Copyright 2024