A LEGAL COMPLIANCE GUIDE FOR THE LOW-INCOME HOUSING TAX CREDIT COMMUNITY F e b r ua ry 2 013 inside this issue Model Form: Track Progress of Open Fraud Investigations . . . . . . . . . . 3 In the News. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 ➤ Ohio Preserves Lower Real Estate Taxes for LIHTC Sites ➤ HUD Seeks Comments on LIHTC Tenant Data Collection Income Calculations: How to Treat Trusts When Calculating Household Income. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 American Taxpayer Relief Act and Housing Tax Credits On Jan. 2, President Obama signed H.R. 8, the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012, into law. The bill had been approved by the Senate by a vote of 89-8 and then by the House of Representatives by a vote of 257-167. Pertaining to affordable housing, the new law extends the new markets tax credit for two years, providing a maximum annual amount of qualified equity investments of $3.5 billion each year. It also extends and modifies the fixed 9 percent low-income housing tax credit floor for LIHTC allocations made before Jan. 1, 2014. For federally subsidized 4 percent tax credit projects, no change was included for them in the legislation, and the monthly rates will continue to fluctuate and be published by the IRS. In addition, the package also retroactively extends the provision that the basic housing allowance of a member of the military is not considered income for purposes of calculating whether that person qualifies as a low-income tenant from Dec. 31, 2011, through Dec. 31, 2013. fe ature Use Tracking Sheets to Organize and Guide Fraud Investigations In these economic times, you may have experienced an uptick in qualified applicants applying for units at your tax credit site. Unfortunately, a small subset of these applicants is probably reporting false income in an attempt to take advantage of subsidized rent rates. Recently, the Worcester Housing Authority (WHA) in Massachusetts reported nearly $1.6 million in fraud over the past five years. According to the report, from 2008 to 2012, WHA staff and investigators reviewed 2,000 suspected cases of fraud. And as a result, a total of $664,775 was recovered, along with agreements for another $428,162 to be paid back. In addition, nine cases were taken to court, where a total of $62,769 was ordered to be repaid, according to the report. Most likely, your site has measures in place to deter fraud and verify applicant information. But there may be devious households that (continued on p. 2) D e a l i n g w i t h t h e IR S How to Get a Private Letter Ruling Like every other tax credit site manager, you may not always be sure of the right way to handle a situation. And the owner may sometimes ask you questions that you can’t answer. For example, you may not know whether the IRS can give the owner more time to elect the site’s minimum set-aside, or whether the IRS will still consider your site residential if you offer certain nursing or medical services to residents. If you don’t do the right thing, your state housing agency may cite you for noncompliance, putting the owner’s tax credits at risk. You can get direction from the IRS on how to handle situations you’re unsure of by applying for a private letter ruling (PLR). PLRs aren’t law, but rather an interpretation and application of law and regulation that the IRS will follow, within certain conditions and limitations. The PLRs do bind the taxpayers that request them. So if the owner of your site requests a PLR, it can safely rely on the ruling. We’ll tell you the steps you must take to help your site’s owner get a PLR, and what you and the owner should keep in mind when requesting one. (continued on p. 5) 2 T A X C R E D I T H O U S I N G M A N A G E M E N T I N S I D E R B O A R D O F A D V IS O R S George Caruso, shcm, nahp - e Edgewood Management Member, NAHMA Board of Directors Germantown, MD Douglas D. Chasick, cpm ® , caps , cas , adv. ram , clp, sle , cdei The Apartment Doctor Melbourne Beach, FL Charles J. Durnin Jr. Interstate Realty Management Co. Marlton, NJ Karen Graham, cpm, hccp Karen A. Graham Consulting, LLC Cincinnati, OH Margaret McFarland, Esq. University of Maryland College Pk., MD Elizabeth Moreland, ncp -e Elizabeth Moreland Consulting, Inc. Orange City, FL Denise B. Muha National Leased Housing Association Washington, DC Ruth Theobold Probst TheoPro Compliance Pewaukee, WI Greg Proctor, shcm, nahp - e Windsor Consulting Lexington, KY Steven L. Rosenblatt Sharon Harper Ivey, Spectrum Seminars, Inc. hccp, ncp - e , scs , fhc Concord Management, LTD Cape Elizabeth, ME Maitland, FL Johrita Solari, shcm, nahp - e , hccp A.J. Johnson, hccp Solari Enterprises, Inc. A.J. Johnson Consulting Orange, CA Services, Inc. Williamsburg, VA Gwen Volk, cpm, shcm, nahp - e , hccp Michael Kotin, hccp LBK Management Kay-Kay Realty Corp. Services Scottsdale, AZ Irving, TX Steven M. McDonald, cpm Westlake Realty Group, Inc. San Mateo, CA Editor: Eric Yoo Executive Editor: Heather Ogilvie Production Director: Kathryn Homenick Director of Operations: Michael Koplin Tax Credit Housing Management Insider [ISSN 15272311 (print), 1938-307X (online)] is published by Vendome Group, LLC, 6 East 32nd Street, New York, NY 10016. Volume 14, Issue 12 Subscriptions/Customer Service: To subscribe or for assistance with your subscription, call 1-800-519-3692 or go to our Web site, www.vendomerealestatemedia.com. Subscription rate: $470 for 12 issues. To Contact the Editor: Email: [email protected]. Call: Eric Yoo at (212) 812-8435. Fax: (212) 228-1308. To Place an Advertisement: Please email Erin Tyler, etyler @vendomegrp.com, or call (216) 373-1217. Disclaimer: This publication provides general coverage of its subject area. It is sold with the understanding that the publisher is not engaged in rendering legal, accounting, or other professional advice or services. If legal advice or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought. The publisher shall not be responsible for any damages resulting from any error, inaccuracy, or omission contained in this publication. © 2013 by Vendome Group, LLC. All rights reserved. No part of Tax Credit Housing Management Insider may be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed, published, or broadcast in any form or in any media without prior written permission of the publisher. To request permission to reuse this content in any form, including distribution in educational, professional, or promotional contexts, or to reproduce material in new works, please contact the Copyright Clearance Center at info@ copyright.com or (978) 750-8400. For custom reprints, eprints, or logo licensing, please contact Donna Paglia at (216) 373-1210 or [email protected]. February 2013 Use Tracking Sheets (continued from p. 1) may have slipped through the cracks. In one recent case, a Minneapolis woman was sentenced in federal court for using an alternative identity to fraudulently receive government benefits, including more than $18,000 in rent benefits. In her plea agreement, she admitted that she applied for, and received, an alternate Social Security card under a fake name. She then used both Social Security numbers and identities to apply for and renew Minnesota identification cards and driver’s licenses, to seek and obtain employment, and to file federal and state tax returns. She had also used the false identity to receive a lower monthly housing rental rate by qualifying for a tax credit unit. According to reports, her fraud resulted in her underpaying more than $18,000 in rent since 2004. Suppose your staff gets an anonymous tip that a household at your tax credit site has more income or members than the household head reported. This can mean you certified some of your households as eligible when, in fact, they weren’t. You’ll need to investigate to discover whether you made compliance mistakes while relying on a tenant’s fraudulent information. But many things can go wrong with an investigation. Busy staffers may neglect or forget about an investigation. Or they may fail to keep good records of the steps they’ve taken and not follow up as needed. Worst of all, a tipster may tell the IRS or your state housing agency that he alerted you to a fraud but that you did nothing, says tax credit site consultant A.J. Johnson. If your agency uncovers a fraud at your site, mistakes may come back to haunt you and the owner may lose its credits, he warns. To ensure that investigations are handled promptly and run smoothly, we’ll give you a Model Form: Track Progress of Open Fraud Investigations, that you can use to track each investigation from the moment you spot an inconsistency in household information until you take steps to evict the household or you write the memo to file. Keep all these forms together in one binder so that it’s easier for a supervisor to oversee investigations. Here’s what you need to know about investigation tracking sheets. How Tracking Sheet Helps An investigation tracking sheet can help organize and streamline your investigation in four ways: Allows easy oversight. A tracking sheet shows the status of an investigation at a glance. A supervisor won’t have to review the entire file to find out what steps have been taken and what, if any, conclusions have been reached. Guides investigation. A tracking sheet serves as a handy outline to help staffers cover all the bases. It asks staffers for all the basic information right away. Then it leads staffers through the appropriate steps. The tracking sheet is also a useful way for staffers to reori(continued on p. 4) © 2013 by Vendome Group, LLC. Any reproduction is strictly prohibited. February 2013 T A X C R E D I T H O U S I N G M A N A G E M E N T I N S I D E R 3 Model Form Track Progress of Open Fraud Investigations To keep investigations of possible fraud by households on course, use a tracking sheet like the one below. It’s based on forms used by the Kentucky Housing Corporation. The Model Tracking Sheet asks for basic information about the inconsistency, and it leads your staffers through all the steps in the investigative process, including the writing of a final memo. INVESTIGATION TRACKING SHEET INSTRUCTIONS: To ensure compliance with the tax credit program, we must investigate any time we learn something that is inconsistent with prior information on household income or membership. Whenever an inconsistency is discovered, start a new investigation tracking sheet by filling out the top section of the form. File the form at the back of the first section of the investigations binder. I. DESCRIPTION OF INCONSISTENCY II. STATUS OF INVESTIGATION Site________________________________________________________ Date _______________________________________________________ ❏ Spoke to household head: Date ____________________________ ❏ Sent verification forms or asked for documentary verification: Name of Household Head _____________________________________ Date ____________________________________________________ A ddress_ ___________________________________________________ Verification source ________________________________________ Tel. #_______________________________________________________ Date ____________________________________________________ Social Security # ____________________________________________ Verification source ________________________________________ How did you learn of the inconsistency? ❏ By reviewing original application ❏ By reviewing recertification information from household ❏ From verification source ❏ From informant: Informant’s name _________________________________________ A ddress _________________________________________________ Tel. # ___________________________________________________ How does informant know household or household member? Keep informant’s name confidential? ❏ Yes ❏ No ❏ Other (explain) ___________________________________________ ❏ Took other steps to investigate: Date ____________________________________________________ Step taken (explain) _ ______________________________________ Date ____________________________________________________ Step taken (explain) _ ______________________________________ ❏ Received verification: Date ____________________________________________________ Verification source ________________________________________ Date ____________________________________________________ Verification source ________________________________________ NOTE: If the investigation shows the household did not, in fact, provide false information, skip Section III and go directly to Section IV. III. FOLLOW-UP ACTIVITIES The inconsistency concerns: ❏ Unreported income Place of employment or source of income_____________________ ❏ Unauthorized household member Name of unauthorized member, if known ______________________ ❏ Other (explain) ___________________________________________ Describe in detail how the inconsistency came to your attention and identify the information provided by the household that is being called into question: ❏ Warning letter sent: Date __________________________________ ❏ Met at household’s request: Date __________________________ ❏ Sent termination notice or met with attorney to discuss termination for fraud and lawsuit for any savings in rent: Date ____________________________________________________ IV. DOCUMENTATION OF INVESTIGATION ❏ Placed memo in file on discrepancy, investigation, and conclusions. Written by: ______________________________________________ Date ____________________________________________________ This section filled out by: __________________________________ Filled out by: _ ______________________________________________ NOTE: After completing Section IV, make a copy of this form for the household file. Then place the original at the back of the investigations binder. © 2013 by Vendome Group, LLC. Any reproduction is strictly prohibited. For more information call 1-800-519-3692 or visit www.vendomerealestatemedia.com. 4 T A X C R E D I T H O U S I N G M A N A G E M E N T I N S I D E R Use Tracking Sheets (continued from p. 2) ent themselves if they return to an investigation after attending to other tasks. Keeps staff vigilant. Having a formal investigations binder—and prepared forms to use—helps to remind staffers of their ongoing responsibility to investigate inconsistencies. It’s easy for staffers to forget about investigations when the paperwork is informally kept or filed away out of sight. Shows your compliance. You can use tracking sheets and an investigations binder to show auditors from the IRS, your state housing agency, and others that you take seriously the possibility of fraud by households—and that your staff promptly carries out investigations. Set Up Binder You should gather tracking sheets in a binder or folder with two sections. In the front section, place tracking sheets for active investigations in chronological order (based on the investigation’s starting date). Completed tracking sheets can go in the back section, also in chronological order. When the binder is opened, the top tracking sheet will be for the oldest ongoing investigation. This provides immediate information on how quickly investigations are going. What Tracking Sheet Covers Your staff should start a tracking sheet any time they hear or see something that’s inconsistent with the relevant informa- tion you got from the household. For example, in the WHA fraud report, one household member living in an elderly community raised suspicions by having a luxury car. The WHA investigated and found the resident didn’t report his true income. And the resident was ordered to pay back $8,700 to the WHA. Our tracking sheet is divided into four sections. It assumes that the staffer who first becomes aware of the inconsistency fills out the first section and signs it. It also assumes that the rest of the tracking sheet is filled out and signed by the person or persons at your site responsible for investigating inconsistent information. But you may choose to assign these responsibilities differently and modify the tracking sheet to fit your procedures. At the end of the investigation process, have your staffers place a copy of the completed tracking sheet in the household’s file. Have them refile the original in the back of the binder with other tracking sheets for completed investigations. Basic data. The first section of the tracking sheet asks for basic data about the inconsistent information. In addition to the name of the site and the date, this section also asks for the identity of the household involved, how the inconsistency was discovered, and what the inconsistency concerns. The section includes checklists to make it easier for the staff member to provide details about the source of the inconsistent information (for example, a verification source) and the nature of the information (for example, unreported income); the staff member simply selects the appropriate item in the checklist. February 2013 Status of investigation. The second section of the tracking sheet takes the staffer conducting the investigation through the appropriate steps—for example, contacting the household and sending verification forms. The tracking sheet monitors the progress of the investigation, since the staffer must fill in the date when each step is taken and the date when verification forms or other kinds of documentary evidence are received. There’s also space for the staffer to indicate what additional investigative steps—for example, interviewing neighbors—were taken and when. Results of investigation. The third section of the tracking sheet walks staffers through the steps to take if the investigation shows that the household gave false information. These steps include sending a warning letter to the household, meeting with the household (if its members choose to meet with you), and starting a legal action against the household. Next to each step is a space for the date the step was taken. Final documentation. In the last section, there’s a box to check to indicate that a memo on the discrepancy, the investigation, and the conclusions drawn was written and is on file. The staffer filling out the tracking sheet must check the box, enter the name of the person writing the memo and the date it was written, and sign his or her own name. ♦ Insider Source A.J. Johnson: President, A.J. Johnson Consulting Services, Inc., 3521 Frances Berkeley, Williamsburg, VA 23188; (757) 259-9920. © 2013 by Vendome Group, LLC. Any reproduction is strictly prohibited. For more information call 1-800-519-3692 or visit www.vendomerealestatemedia.com. February 2013 T A X C R E D I T H O U S I N G M A N A G E M E N T I N S I D E R 5 In the News ➤ Ohio Preserves Lower Real Estate Taxes for LIHTC Sites On Dec. 20, 2012, Ohio Gov. John Kasich signed a bill into law that will keep real estate taxes lower for properties with income restrictions, including lowincome housing tax credit properties. The provision was added to H.B. 510 during Ohio’s lame duck congressional session in an effort to make law a practice that had been common in the state before a bill passed earlier in 2012 prohibited it. In 2009, the Ohio Supreme Court had ruled that owners of affordable housing sites with income restrictions could appeal the property taxes assessed against their properties if a tax appeals board did not consider how federally imposed restrictions might affect a site’s valuation [Ivy Glen Ltd. Partnership v. Fayette City Board of Revision, February 2009]. Although this decision applied only during the appeals process, it still enabled county auditors to lower the property taxes on income-restricted buildings. However, last year, the Ohio General Assembly passed a budget bill that required county auditors to ignore property restrictions when determining a property’s value. The Ohio Housing Council then worked with the Ohio Department of Taxation, the state assembly, and other stakeholders to restore the auditors’ ability to consider income restrictions when assessing income-restricted buildings. As a result, legislators placed an amendment into H.B. 510 that compels auditors to consider a property’s encumbrances when determining its valuation for tax purposes. Since the auditor can now consider a property’s restrictions during the valuation process, site owners in Ohio should end up paying lower taxes for their rent- and income-restricted properties. ➤ HUD Seeks Comments on LIHTC Tenant Data Collection HUD recently released a request for comments on the statutorily mandated collection of information for tenants of low-income housing tax credit (LIHTC)funded properties. The Housing and Economic Recovery Act (HERA) required that each state agency administering tax credits annually furnish HUD with information concerning the race, ethnicity, family composition, age, income, use of rental assistance under Section 8(o) of the U.S. Housing Act of 1937 or other similar assistance, disability status, and monthly rental payments of households residing in each property receiving tax credits through the agency. HUD established standards and definitions for the information to be collected and provided states with technical assistance in establishing systems to compile and submit the information, and, in coordination with other federal agencies administering housing programs, established procedures to minimize duplicative reporting requirements for sites assisted under multiple housing programs. And in 2010, HUD’s Office of Management and Budget approved the first collection form (HUD form 52697) used for the collection of LIHTC household information (OMB Approval No. 2528–0165; expiration date 05/31/2013). Renewal of this form is required for HUD to remain in compliance with HERA. HUD is accepting comments until Feb. 26, 2013. ♦ Dealing with the IRS (continued from p. 1) Take Five Steps to Get PLR Here are the steps involved in getting a PLR: Step #1: Get advice from a tax credit attorney. Before moving ahead with the request for a PLR, advise the owner to consult a tax credit attorney. An attorney can determine whether it’s wise or even necessary to request a PLR. The attorney can confirm that there’s a need for a ruling. The IRS ordinarily won’t issue “comfort” letter rulings on matters that are already squarely addressed by statute, regulation, court decision, revenue ruling, revenue procedure, or notice. And because the IRS revenue procedure that explains how to request a PLR is complex, the attorney can help the owner write the PLR request in the form the IRS requires. The current procedures are in Revenue Procedure 2012-01, which can be found in Internal Revenue Bulletin 2012-1 or at www.irs.gov/pub/irs-irbs/irb12-01. pdf. A sample letter ruling request is included in the appendix. (continued on p. 6) © 2013 by Vendome Group, LLC. Any reproduction is strictly prohibited. For more information call 1-800-519-3692 or visit www.vendomerealestatemedia.com. 6 T A X C R E D I T H O U S I N G M A N A G E M E N T I N S I D E R Dealing with the IRS (continued from p. 5) You may also seek advice directly from the IRS. Before applying for a ruling, in addition to doing research to convince the IRS to rule favorably, you should call an IRS employee who deals in your subject matter to discuss your proposed ruling request. Most published rulings include a name and phone number of the person involved with the ruling who can direct you to someone with whom to informally discuss your proposed request. Revenue Procedure 2012-1 includes a list of phone numbers to request a pre-submission conference in person or by telephone. Step #2: Prepare request. The next step is to prepare a written statement that includes the information the IRS needs to consider the request. Even if an attorney prepares the actual statement, you may need to help the attorney by supplying some information. Although some PLR requests require additional information, all requests must include the following: ■ A complete statement of facts and other related information; ■ An analysis of material facts; ■ A statement indicating whether the issue affects any tax returns the owner already filed; ■ A statement indicating whether a ruling on the same or a similar matter has been issued or requested, or is pending; ■ A list of authorities that support the request; ■ A list of authorities that appear to run contrary to the request; ■ A statement identifying any pending legislation that would affect the request; ■ A statement identifying information to be deleted from the copy of the PLR the IRS will make available for public inspection; ■ The owner’s signature or the signature of its authorized representative; ■ A list of authorized representatives; ■ A power of attorney and declaration of representative from each authorized representative; ■ A statement attesting to the accuracy of the request under penalties of perjury (using language provided in the revenue procedure) [Rev. Proc. §7.01(15)]; and ■ The number of copies of the request the owner is submitting. A taxpayer generally needs to submit only one copy of a PLR request. But if the request covers more than one issue, the IRS encourages taxpayers to submit multiple copies. Also, under certain circumstances outlined in the revenue procedure, taxpayers must submit two copies of their PLR requests [Rev. Proc. §7.01(16)]. Step #3: Assemble required documents and attach them to request. The IRS requires the owner to attach the following documents to the PLR request: ■ Copies of all relevant documents, such as the owner’s tax credit application and the site’s extended use agreement; and ■ A checklist covering all items included in the request. (You can get a blank checklist from Appendix C of the revenue procedure.) Step #4: Submit request to IRS with required fee. The owner must submit the PLR request to the IRS’s national office. The address to use depends on how the owner delivers the request. For more information, check the revenue procedure [Rev. Proc. §7.03(1)]. In some cases, the national office may refer the request to a local IRS field office [Rev. Proc. §14.03]. February 2013 If you’re helping with the submission, make sure the owner includes a check or money order to cover the fee for filing a PLR request. Read the fee schedule in Appendix A of the revenue procedure to determine the correct fee. Fees range from $625 to $11,500. Step #5: Respond to any issues IRS rep raises. In most cases, an IRS representative must contact the owner within 21 days after the IRS gets the PLR request to discuss procedural matters. The representative must tell the owner whether he’ll recommend to the IRS that it issue a PLR and what the PLR should say. And the representative may ask the owner to send more information to help the IRS properly consider the request [Rev. Proc. §10.02]. Also, be sure to maintain contact with the IRS while your ruling is pending. Obtaining a complex PLR generally takes months. Keeping in touch with the person listed in the IRS acknowledgment of receipt of your ruling application can speed up the process. Issues IRS Won’t Consider The IRS won’t consider all issues presented in a PLR. It won’t respond to: Issues that arise only in hypothetical or alternative situations. The IRS may issue a PLR in response to owners’ questions “about their status for tax purposes” and the “tax effects of their acts or transactions…” [Rev. Proc. §3]. But the IRS won’t issue a PLR that would bind an owner in a situation that very well may not occur [Rev. Proc. §6.02]. Frivolous issues. The IRS warns against requesting PLRs for frivolous issues. A “frivolous issue” is “one without basis in fact or law” © 2013 by Vendome Group, LLC. Any reproduction is strictly prohibited. For more information call 1-800-519-3692 or visit www.vendomerealestatemedia.com. February 2013 T A X C R E D I T H O U S I N G M A N A G E M E N T I N S I D E R or that supports “a position that courts have held groundless” [Rev. Proc. §6.10]. The revenue procedure gives examples, such as claiming that filing a tax return violates constitutional claims such as due process, involuntary servi- tude, or that your situation somehow constitutes an unreasonable search. Requests to change the law. If you or the owner disagree with part of the tax credit law, don’t try 7 to change it by requesting a PLR. Only Congress can amend the tax credit law. The IRS is limited to applying the law to an owner’s particular situation. ♦ Income Calculations How to Treat Trusts When Calculating Household Income When certifying or recertifying households at your tax credit site, it’s not uncommon to discover that a household member is the creator or beneficiary of a trust. If so, you’ll need to account for the trust when calculating the household’s income. If you don’t know how to treat trusts, you’ll make mistakes when trying to determine a household’s eligibility to occupy a lowincome unit. The HUD Handbook sets out rules for treating trusts when certifying and recertifying your low-income households [HUD Handbook 4350.3, par. 5-7(G)(1)]. We’ll explain what a trust is so you can identify trusts that your applicants or households have. And we’ll tell you what the Handbook says to do if you discover that a member of one of your low-income households is the creator or the beneficiary of a trust. What’s a Trust? The Handbook defines a trust as “a legal arrangement generally regulated by state law in which one party (the creator or grantor) transfers property to a second party (the trustee) who holds the property for the benefit of one or more third parties (the beneficiaries)” [Handbook 4350.3, par. 5-7(G)(1)(a)(1)]. A trust can contain cash or property that could be converted to cash. Generally the assets are invested by the creator for the benefit of the beneficiaries. You must account for a trust when calculating a household’s income if a household member is either the creator of the trust or its beneficiary. When Household Member Is Creator of Trust How you must treat a trust that a household member has created depends on whether the member has access to the income or principal from the trust. Here’s a rundown on what the Handbook says you must do: Revocable trusts. A revocable trust is a trust that the creator of the trust may amend or end (revoke). When there is a revocable trust, the creator has access to the funds in the trust account. In other words, a household member who’s the creator of a revocable trust may amend or revoke (that is, end) the trust and has access to the trust funds. Because of this, you must treat revocable trusts as assets. To do this, add the trust’s “cash value” (that is, the amount the household member would get if he withdrew all the funds) to the household’s total net assets. Also, add any interest income from the trust to the household’s actual income from assets. Nonrevocable trusts. A household member who’s the creator of a nonrevocable trust can’t revoke it once it’s set up. And the member can’t access the trust funds. Because a household member who’s the creator of a nonrevocable trust doesn’t have access to the principal, the Handbook says that you generally must treat this type of trust as an asset disposed of for less than fair market value [Handbook 4350.3, par. 5-7(G) (1)(b)(4)]. This means you must count the principal as part of your asset calculations—but only if the trust was created within two years before the household’s certification or recertification date. After the two-year period is over, don’t include the principal of the trust in your asset calculations. However, you mustn’t consider a nonrevocable trust as an asset disposed of for less than fair market value if the trust was created using funds received through a settlement or judgment [Handbook 4350.3, par. 5-7(G)(8)(e)]. In any case, if the household member gets interest from the nonrevocable trust, treat this amount as part of the household income (just as you would if it were a revocable trust). (continued on p. 8) © 2013 by Vendome Group, LLC. Any reproduction is strictly prohibited. For more information call 1-800-519-3692 or visit www.vendomerealestatemedia.com. 8 T A X C R E D I T H O U S I N G M A N A G E M E N T I N S I D E R Income Calculations hold member who’s the beneficiary of a trust gets all the trust funds in one payment, it’s a lump-sum receipt and must be treated as an asset. (continued from p. 7) When Household Member Is Beneficiary of Trust If a member of one of your lowincome households is the beneficiary of a trust, how you account for the trust depends on whether the beneficiary gets the funds at once or in periodic payments [Handbook 4350.3, par. 5-7(G)(1) (b)(5)]. Here’s how to handle each situation: Household member gets periodic income from trust. If the household member gets payments of interest or principal from the trust, you must consider these payments as regular income or gifts and count them as part of the household income. Household member gets full value of trust at once. If the house- A household member may be the beneficiary of a “special needs February 2013 trust,” which is a trust that’s often created for the benefit of a person who’s disabled and can’t make financial decisions for himself. If that’s the case, the household member probably won’t have access to the funds, which means you can disregard the trust when certifying or recertifying the household. However, if the household member gets any income payments, you must count them as part of the household income, just as you would with any other trust [Handbook 4350.3, par. 5-7(G)(1)(c)]. ♦ DiD You Know that the number of housing discrimination cases filed each year keeps rising? … and that housing providers like you are paying higher penalties and settlements — sometimes over $1 million? Take Fair Housing CoaCH’s Pop Quiz: Q Can someone who isn’t disabled sue for disability discrimination under the Fair Housing Act? a Yes, according to a federal court in Florida, in Falin v. Condo Assn. of La Mer Estates, Inc. (Nov. 2011). Avoid the costly mistakes that could trigger a discrimination complaint. Let Fair Housing CoaCH train your staff how to comply with fair housing law. Fair Housing CoaCH ® In addition to a monthly lesson, quiz, and eAlerts sent directly to your email inbox, you’ll get 24/7 access to our Web site archive of five years’ worth of lessons and quizzes. Fair Housing Here are some recent topics covered in FAir Housing CoACH— CoaCH ✦ Avoiding Fair Housing Problems in New Media n complainTs ly discr minaTio ff To avoid cosT Trains your sTa Esta e Edi o s ★★ nal As oc at on of R al in J ne 2011 y the Na i ★★ Named Bes Newsl t er January 2012 Th s MonTh’s Lesson How to Protect Your communitY from r ace Discrimination claims her King In honor of Martin Lu ocusDay th s month s issue based es on discrim na ion of fair on race—the bed ock housing aw ➤ Let’s Begin! our es on fo u es on Mart n Luth r King Day This month in honor of r hou ing law When the ra e—the bedrock of fa di cr mina ion based on la in h ti n ap to re to ye w h ® n complainTs ly d scriminaT o ff To avoid cosT Trains your sTa ate E i ors ★★ l Ass ci t on of Re l Es in Ju e 011 by he Na ion ★★ Named Best New le te vg fo l w re al m pa ra cu to A ed N Co ga D re pr fa ab MArcH 2012 Meeting Disability RelateD neeDs of inDiviDuals with Mobility iMpaiRMents rev ews Th s mon h s lesson housing the bas cs of fa r dea ing requirem ents for mobi w th indiv duals with with i y mpairments along le con uan area of considerab between sion—the interplay Amerfair housing law and the Act icans W th Disabi it es ➤ Let’s Begin! ules r qu r ng commuo r view he fair hous ng This mon h we re go ng duals with mob l ty l ty- ela ed n eds of ndiv ni ies to addre s he d sab im Fair Housing CoaCH m t h a le re u a ® n complainTs ly discr minaTio ff To avoid cosT Tra ns your sTa E ta e Ed to s ★★ nal As oc at on of R al in une 20 1 by the Na i ★★ Named Be t Newsl t er s w s ab ta FEbruary 2012 W S t g s d i m Trend WaTch: dealing WiTh The r ise in MulTi generaTional households exam nes This month s lesson icat ons the a r housing imp the rapid of he atest t end onal increase n mult generat l v ng arrangements ➤ Let’s Begin! atng mp ic tions of the to ook at he air hous This month we e o ng l ving ar angemen s ase in mu tig nerat onal e t rend he apid incr ds we e omMultig nerat onal househo t s not a new phenomenon ly a qua ter of the poputhey accounted for nea But the mon unt l the 1940s when the Pew Resear h Center by is analy ecent a la ion acco ding to one roof fe l out of th seve al genera ions under to researchers s y l ving w il he 1 80s when t fe l I dec in ng s eadi y un avor af er Wor d War y 28 m l ion—Ame icans about 12 per ent of—rough ng un il t sed ourse g adual y ncreas S nce then he rend reve of 2008 a r cord numn the past ew yea s As expe ienc d a big jump ved in a mu t generaly 49 mill on Ame icans—l ber—16 pe cent or nea two du t gener tions ast l at as Pew by s defined t onal househo d wh ch on Most cons s ed of two east one other generat or parent Sl ghtly or a grandpa ent and at head w th an adult h ld adult gene at ons—a household thr e or mo e enera ions— or examp e d more than a hird encompasse g andchi d accord ng o Pew resear hers d and a househo der adu t chi ations —that s a grandd of two skipped gene The remainder cons st d par nt and a grandchi dEmographics Economics and rea on or he apid are at play the overr ding A though many fac ors s is the G eat R cess on onal l ving ar angemen incr ase in mu tig nerat rom the high unemp oyhers Finan ial woes— uel d the rend according to Pew esear of the hous ng marke —have ment ra e and the co lapse or underemployed adu ts e ther unemployed par icu ar y among oung bring ng along the r are wi h th ir paren s Many who have moved ba k 011 10 perc nt of h lBu eau eports hat in h ch ldren The U S Census 78 p rcent also i ed wi h at east one grandparent dren under 18 liv d wi at lea t one pa ent s h ve ueled woes chang ng demographi is the ag ng Combin d wi h economic key fa tor rat onal househo ds One the crea ion of mul ig n y The U S popu at on reased l vels of d sabi i n t h wi apopu he on—and popu at and percent of larg st in terms of si e l 65 and older is now he 2010 Census As of Apr y ele sed da a rom the tion acco ding to n w ncrea ing by 5 3 m ll on ion people 65 and o der 2010 there were 40 3 mil than the tot l popu at on oup grew at a ast r ate r over the decade That g popula ion 65 and o d Dur ng h t d cade the between 2000 nd 2010 grew 9 7 perc nt he otal U S popula ion grew 5 1 perc nt while ly cul ural y and e hn ca more ng becom is on Meanwhi e the nat ✦ What Is a Family? Complying with the Law in Light of Changing Family Structures ✦ Documenting Disability-Related Accommodation and Modification Requests ✦ Complying with Fair Housing Law When Dealing with a Hoarding Problem ✦ Trend Watch: Dealing with the Rise in Multigenerational Households ✦ State Law Roundup: Checklist of State Fair Housing Protections subsCribe Today! go to www.FairHousingCoach.com or call 1-800-519-3692
© Copyright 2024